web counter

Mercury's reports for 2011


Olney Council report for January 2011

Public participation
Tim Regan Coneygere resident Tim Regan spoke at the start of this month's meeting. Tim explained that he was there to present a 'human face' on an issue which has been the subject of some discussion at council meetings over the last few months. This matter was an item later on the agenda but for information, Tim has a large tree growing outside his house, number 6, which is threatening lo undermine the foundations and he wants to have It removed. Olney Town Council's (OTC) position has been that this is a matter between him and the builder, since the tree was there when the house was built and the builder should have provide the house with suitable footings.  Tim was at pains to point out that he is not 'anti-tree' and if it were possible to put the offending tree on wheels and move it elsewhere he would be delighted, but the fact is that it is knocking down his house. Due to the age of the house (some 20 years, believes Mercury) Tim said he did not think it practical to go back to the builders and, although he would be sad to see it go, removal is the only option.

Driftway 
It is possible that an end to the long running saga of the Driftway landscaping may be in sight. Attending the meeting was John Price Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Neighbourhood Manager for Environmental Services for Rural Areas and his assistant, Rob Ward. John said that there were a number of options available to resolve the problem:

1. Do nothing and continue with efforts to establish wild flowers on the existing banks. Cost to be met by developer.

2. Keep the existing profile, remove the wild flowers, and establish topsoil and amenity grass. Cost approx £10,000 to be met by MKC.

3. Reshape the Mound and establish amenity grass. Full cost in region of £120,000 to be met by MKC.

John explained that the original problem with option 2 had been that the banks were too steep to be maintained by traditional mowing equipment, but as a result of an accident elsewhere MKC had been obliged to purchase equipment which could mow the banks. He said some preliminary investigations had been done into option 3 and presented the plans to the council. The reshaping would have the effect of reducing the overall height of the bank by 1.5m and the soil removed would be used to fill the existing gap. The downside was that some residents would now have a view across to the industrial estate opposite, which the mound currently blocks. Dave Price was concerned that OTC should consult the affected residents, but Steve Clark said any reshaping would require planning permission which would necessitate notification to the residents who could then express their opinion.
Tony Evans said that the options presented were no different to those offered by MKC six months ago. The situation had now changed in that it would be possible to leave the profile of the banks as they are and sow with grass which could now be mown, although he thought that £10,000 to 'sow grass on a heap of soil was very expensive!'. He thought it a waste of lime to even consider the more expensive plan which had no chance of getting approved. If a decent sward could be grown on the existing banks without invasion by weeds and thistles then that was the obvious choice, he said. Jeremy Rawlings felt that to spend £120,000 of MKC's ratepayers' money on what was essentially cosmetic work was "obscene" in the present financial climate. At this stage Mayor Mike Hughes reminded the meeting that it was not OTC that had bought the proposals to the table, but MKC.
Rob Ward said that the costs quoted were worst case scenarios and agreed that they appeared very expensive but warned to ensure that all options were put before OTC so that they could make an informed decision.
Dave Price once again suggested that local residents should be consulted but Mike Hughes believed that this would not be necessary for the preferred option 2, since there was now no intention to reshape the mound which had been constructed in line with the original planning permission. Steve Clark proposed that the council progress with option 2 and the vote was passed unanimously. 

Planning Items 
Steve Clark reported that a notification had been received from MKC concerning development of land to the rear of 57 and 59 Moores Hill. At this point Tony Evans declared an interest, having relatives living nearby. One of these houses is privately owned and the other is owned by MKC. The property owned by MKC has a covenant preventing further building taking place on the plot, which it will be seeking to relax. The intention then would be to apply for planning permission to build three new houses on the combined plot, with access from Dinglederry, although that would be subject of a separate request for Planning Permission. Steve reminded the council that such infill requests had been rejected in the past and said they would need to decide whether or not to object to this one in principle. Deidre Bethune said that this appeared to go against government policy of not splitting up gardens for development. She also noted that intention appeared to be to limit the number of houses to three and wondered if that would be fair on other residents in the area who might then wish to sell off land in a similar fashion. Ron Bull asked if the scheme would help towards MKC's quota of new houses but Deidre said that infill does not count towards the quota Mike Hughes, possibly playing devil's advocate, asked if OTC should not be supporting what appeared to be a workable plan which would raise money for cash-strapped MKC and was likely to go ahead in any case. Tony Evans emphasised the need to consult the nearby residents, since 15-20 houses in total could be seriOusly impacted. He felt that it was important that the matter should be dealt with correctly by MKC, since they own part of the land, will sell it to a developer and will be responsible for granting planning permission. Mike Hughes reminded the members that the plans before them only related lo the disposal of the land and not any subsequent building and that residents would get the chance to comment when planning permission was requested. He proposed the motion that the council should thank MKC for the consultation and reserve comment for any subsequent planning request, which was passed on a vote.
The matter of the tree outside number 6 Coneygere was discussed under this agenda item. Tony Evans said it was clear that the tree had been there when the house was built but if the owner asked for permission to remove It and replace with two trees in the cemetery that would be acceptable. Mike Hughes said that OTC would not wish to be seen as intransigent on the matter and suggested that the council should allow the tree to be removed, so long as It was not at a cost to MKC. Della Cheal wondered if the owner's insurance would cover the cost of removing the tree. At this point Standing Orders were suspended and Tim Regan was invited to speak.
Tim confirmed that he had building insurance and hoped that ii would cover such costs. Standing Orders were then reintroduced and a vote taken recommending that MKC be requested to remove the offending tree, which was passed unanimously. 

Councillors' email addresses
Jeremy Rawlings explained that OTC has use of the domain 'olneytowncouncil.gov.uk' which can be used as a suffix for members' personalised email addresses, e.g. JeremyRawlings@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. This provides a standard format which would make it easier for members of the public to contact their councillors, rather than the current collection of individual email addresses, he said. If they did not want a personal email published then members could opt for admin@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, which would go the Town Clerk for onward distribution.
The proposal, whilst apparently acceptable to most members generated a surprising amount of anger and hostility from some, who appeared not to like having such a 'label' imposed upon them. John Sharp felt that councillors should be free to decide if they wanted to publish their existing personal email addresses and Deidre Bethune felt they were being treated like naughty school children and being told what to do. In any case, she never gets any emails from members of the public so what does it matter, she said. Eventually it was decided to allow members to publish their existing personal addresses If they really want to. 

Bits 'n' Bobs
A letter had been received from Mark Luckin of The Olney Group (TOG) who organise the annual Fireworks Night. TOG has donated £500 to OTC in recognition of the fact that OTC underwrites the event every year in case of financial loss. The underwriting has only had to be called upon once in the entire history of this popular event.  Tony Evans reported that a vacancy had arisen at the Ann Hopkins Smith Almshouses and any elderly female resident of the town wishing to take it up should contact him.
Steve Clark reported that the Whirly Pit had frozen over in the recent cold spell, resulting in the loss or many, if not all of the fish. The pit is under the ownership of MKC, who had apparently made no effort to prevent it from freezing over or to remove the dead fish, resulting in something of a bad smell. Mike Hughes suggested an agenda item for a future meeting lo propose that OTC take ownership, enabling the council's own workers to maintain it.  Deidre Bethune said that there had been much confusion about refuse collection over the Christmas period, resulting in refuse bags lying around for over two weeks. The MKC website slated that there would be a collection between Christmas and the New Year but it was not until Christmas Eve that an email had been sent to the Town Clerk confirming that the next scheduled collection would be Tuesday January 4th, which was then too late lo advertise. Jeremy Rawlings reminded the council that only last month they had decided not to progress with training for the Clerk on the use of Social Media (e.g. Facebook, Twitter etc.) which would have been an Ideal method of distributing such news. 

Next Meeting - Monday 7th February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
 
 

Olney Council report for February 2011

A Full but Brief Meeting
Despite there being a very full agenda for this month's meeting. Deputy Mayor Steve Clark managed to keep the meeting moving at a brisk pace. This was In no small part due to locally produced ale 'Hopping Mad' being on sale at The Swan for £1 a pint on this particular evening!* 

Public Participation
Although the council chamber was packed with members of the public, none of them were there to speak at the beginning of the meeting. II transpired that most ol them were there for the meeting referred to in the first agenda item and left as soon as it had been discussed. 


Future of Healthcare in Milton Keynes
Present at the meeting was Gill Prager, Director of Quality and Governance for Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust Gill was there to present to the council the proposals set out in the consultation document 'Shaping the Future of Healthcare in Milton Keynes' and afterwards to hold one of a series of 'Tell Us' meetings at which the public would have an opportunity to speak to NHS staff about the specific proposals. Gill explained that the NHS is facing Its toughest financial challenge and most radical reorganisation since it was created in 1948. NHS Milton Keynes is responsible for providing healthcare service for all people registered with General Practitioner (GP) surgeries In Milton Keynes. as well as dentists, hospitals and community services.
It has an annual budget of £360 million which rise by less than 0.5% per year over the next few years, despite the fact that the population Is rising and becoming increasingly elderly. It has been overspending for some time and as a result the hospital, alone, is £5 million in the red. II will not be possible to continue to provide the same level of services, so ways must be found or providing better services for more people with less money and to claw back some of the deficit. The reorganisation will see the end of Primary Healthcare trusts. she said, and in preparation for that NHS MK had already reduced its managers and administration staff by 40"/4.
The consultation document refers to 'thresholds' which are guidelines for GPs to follow to when assessing patients· needs for treatment. Deidre Bethune asked Gill how sticking to these thresholds would save money? GIii said that GPs do not currently stick to the current guidelines and will refer patients for treatment according to their professional opinions, regardless of the guidelines and cost. For many types of treatment new thresholds will be introduced which GPs will be obliged to comply with.
This will reduce the number of patients undergoing those treatments, thus saving money, she said. Jeremy Rawlings said that this would lead to people suffering and singled out the new threshold for hip replacement patients lo be unable to walk more than 250 metres as ridiculous. Gill acknowledged that in some cases it may mean more people having to suffer pain for longer. The consultation period runs until Friday 25th February, so may well be over by the time you read this report, but the document can be downloaded from www.mlltonkeynes.nhs.uk/discussion2011.htm 

Driftway
Tony Evans reported that he had had a meeting with John Prioe, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Neighbourhood Manager for Environmental Services for Rural Areas, and his assistant Rob Ward. It had been agreed that the mound would be left with the existing profile, although there were concerns about the quality of the existing topsoil. MKC are looking to see if they can come to a financial agreement with Wimpey's, the developers. Tony emphasised that !the work must be done this spring and said that John and Rob were keen to resolve the Issue. 

Infants School
Jeremy Rawlings reported that as of February 1st the school had obtained Foundation status, which Is the first stage to becoming an Academy. The Governors now own the land and buildings so the switch over to full academy status can happen any lime. with June 1st being the probable date. 

Olney Brass Band
Tony Moroney, Chairman of Stantonbury Brass, presented a proposal to change their name to 'Olney Brass'. Tony explained that the band would shortly lose its main source of funding and would have to fold on April 1st unless an alternative source of funding could be found. The proposal was to change the name and form a closer allegiance to the town and request some funding from OTC. As a working band, they would look to be as self supportive as possible and raise money through member subscriptions, engagements and concerts. They would also apply for charitable status. which would also bring financial benefit through the gift aid scheme, he said. The band has 12 residents of Olney and Emberton amongst its strength of 25, 4 of whom are founder members. Throughout its 30 - 40 year existence Olney has featured more than anywhere else in !their regular performances, whether through its annual Christmas concert, Dickens of a Christmas, various fates and carolling. Over the years it would be fair to say that the band enjoyed a stronger affiliation with Olney, than with either Stantonbury or Milton Keynes, he said. Younger members of the band progress. both as Individuals and as musicians and often go on to study music at university. The band were particularly proud of two of their current young players, one of whom has been offered a place at The Royal Northern College, whilst his own 15 year old son has been accepted Into The National Youth Brass Band. As part of their commitment to Olney and the surrounding area it is also the intention to form an Olney Brass Development band, which would be available to all brass players who have attained at least grade 3 and it is hoped that they would be able to offer this opportunity free to members less than 18 years of age. The council members seemed generally happy to endorse the name change and the issue or funding was referred to the Finance Committee. 

Cobbs Garden Surgery - Specialist Nurse for the Elderly
Carol Russell of Cobbs Garden Patient Participation Group was present to request OTC funding of a Specialist Nurse for the Elderly. Carol explained that that the surgery had employed an ex-District Nurse for the past two years, funded by Milton Keynes PCT. This funding had now been withdrawn so the present incumbent would be made redundant. She said that a letter in The Phonebox requesting local businesses, charities and MKC to provide sponsorship had met with only a limited response, so It was vital that funding be found from elsewhere. The intention would be to separate the post from the surgery so that it belonged to the community rather than the surgery, but the surgery would continue to provide facilities such as a desk, computer and phone. The current post holder was employed for 15 hours a week working with people who were socially isolated, lonely and anxious. Many of these people need time to be listened to, and practical help In many ways, such as filling out forms to claim attendance allowance etc. Carol said that in order to keep the nurse employed for a year they would need £13,500. Deidre Bethune, as Chair of the Finance Committee, was concerned that It would need to be an ongoing grant and wondered if OTC could be liable for redundancy payments if the post could not be maintained. Carol said she was optimistic that funding might be forthcoming from elsewhere for future years. Deidre said that. Deidre said that the Finance Committee were minded to fund the post for a year at a cost of £13,500 and proposed that the full council approve the recommendation, which they did unanimously on a vote. 

Bits n Bobs
The Parish Precept {the amount of Olney residents' Council Tax which goes directly to OTC) will once again be retained at the existing rate.  The council agreed to purchase laptop for the Town Clerk and Deputy at a cost of £498+VAT to include relevant Microsoft software.  A vacancy exists for the Chair of the Personnel Committee. New member Colin Rodden was nominated and selected but then deselected on a pint of order, possibly the shortest tenure of any committee chairman on the council!  Next Meeting - Monday 7th March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.  *It had sold out by the time Mercury arrived.
 
 

Olney Council report for March 2012

Public Participation
Chris Talbot Chris Talbot, Treasurer of Olney Rugby Club, opened this month's meeting. He explained that Olney has enjoyed splendid sports facilities due to Olney Town Council (OTC) and the Sports Clubs. Olney Rugby Club now owns ten acres of land freehold and the Club's Management Committee has decided to proceed down a limited liability company route, splitting the Club into two parts: one to hold the assets and the other to run the activities and provide the facilities while maintaining the status required for gift aid, etc.  He asked if OTC would let the Club acquire the freehold of the land on which the clubhouse stands in exchange for a suitable sum, thus giving it the freehold of both the clubhouse and the adjacent field. If this was approved, he noted that the Club would be happy for there to be a covenant restricting the land's use to being for a clubhouse. 

Census for England and Wales
Richard Izzard. responsible for coordinating the Census for Olney, Newport Pagnell, Astwood and Stoke Goldington, gave a detailed talk about it. The main point is that, if you've not submitted yours by the time you read this - get a move on!

Olney Rugby Club 
The first item to be considered in the meeting proper was Chris Talbot's request for the Club to acquire the freehold of the land on which the clubhouse stands. Two Councillors. Tony Evans and John Smail, had declared a personal interest in this item, meaning they could discuss but not vote on it.  Mike Hughes introduced the topic, explaining that the Bowls Club owns its own clubhouse while the Tennis, Crick.et, Rugby and Football Clubs do not. He invited Councillors' views. Tony spoke in favour of granting the request, seeing nothing wrong with it. John Sharp spoke against ii. feeling that the Council should try to benefit the whole town and not Just the Rugby Club. Dave Price spoke in favour, noting that the Club does benefit the whole town - through sport and other community activities such as quiz and charity nights. Finally, Ron Bull asked how the Council would come to a decision as to what the freehold was worth, Gill Edmonson noting that, as achieving best value is a Council requirement, this would indeed have to be done properly. Ron believed it would have a high value, while Mike Hughes disagreed, due to the covenant which would be associated with the land.  Councillors voted by majority of seven to one, with two abstentions, in favour of obtaining legal advice and furthering the discussion with the Rugby Club. 

Environmental Services 
Rob Ward, Milton Keynes Council Neighbourhood Manager for Environmental Services, gave a presentation. Note that Rob's title is as stated here and not, as stated previously, the assistant to that post.  In the first part of his presentation, Rob explained that he manages the delivery of Environmental Services in the rural parts of Milton Keynes (MK) Borough, covering waste collection, landscape, highway maintenance, play area maintenance and neighbourhood enforcement. Savings of around 30% would have to be made in the next lour years, which would require choices of what could and could not be achieved, alongside ensuring the best use of resources. Readers who wish to report a problem with any of the services Rob manages should call 01908 252570. 

Driftway
The second part of Rob's presentation concerned the Driftway banks. As background, note that in the previous meeting, John Price and Rob Ward had presented three options to resolve the problem ... 
1. Do nothing and continue with efforts to establish wild flowers on the existing banks. Cost to be met by the developer. 2. Keep the existing profile, remove the wild flowers, and establish topsoil and amenity grass. Cost approx £10,000 to be met by MKC. 3. Reshape the mound and establish amenity grass. Full cost in region of £120,000 to be met by MKC.
... and the Council had voted unanimously in favour of option 2. At the time, the Driftway banks were believed not to have been adopted by MKC.  Since then, Rob had discovered that MKC's Highways department had in fact adopted the Driftway banks, although the Section 106 element relating to completion of the landscaping had not been signed off. The results of this were that MKC may not have as much negotiating power with the developer, Taylor Wimpey, as previously thought. However, independent of that. Rob stressed that MKC remained committed to completing the works on Driftway. 
Rob proposed two new options: 
A. Plant grass and shrubs in six inches of topsoil then cut approximately six times per year. Costs: £8,500 to Implement, £900 per year to cut. Summary: high potential for success, attractive, higher ongoing cost.
B. Plant further mixed species and wild flowers In a thin layer of topsoil, providing new growth and encouraging what's there to develop, then cut twice a year. Costs: £3,200 to implement, £300 per year to cut. Summary: Higher biodiversity, fairly attractive, lower maintenance cost.
Mike Hughes stated that option A was basically that agreed by OTC in its previous meeting, that this was what should be done and that suggesting a cheaper alternative was merely MKC trying to ease its way into doing less and less work.  This was debated at length and the following is a just brief summary. Tony Evans felt that only option A was likely to be successful. Deidre Bethune suggested a compromise, planting mixed species and wild flowers in six inches of topsoil. Both Tony Evans and Mike Hughes wanted MKC to stick to the original agreement, option A, and commit to an ear1y planting date in order to increase the chance of a successful outcome.  Rob Ward agreed to follow option A, with the work to be done 'in weeks' and certainly before the end of April. 

Market costs 
For each Thursday Market, the Council hires a skip and cleaning service to complete tidying up after the stallholders have left. This costs £322 per week which, put another way, represents 44% of each stall's weekly rent. As the skip doesn't get particularly full, the Council discussed whether it and the cleaning service provided were worth continuing with. No decision was made, though the issue will be explored further. 

More doggy do
There'd been an incident during a Rugby match on Doffs Field where a player had fallen into some dog poo, which caused his eye to swell up. This raised the issue of dog fouling in general, which continues to be a problem on the Sports Fields. Although no decision was made, it's likely that around ten additional signs will be placed around the Fields to ensure there's no doubt that the practice is illegal.

Personnel Committee Chair
In February, Della Cheal stepped down from being Chair of the Personnel Committee. She was generally acknowledged to have been very good at this role, and Councillors were keen to fill the vacant position. As reported in last month's Mercury, Colin Rodden had been selected for the post and then immediately deselected on a point of order. The issue was that he wasn't a Committee Chair, Standing Order 16 stating that the 'Personnel Committee (is) to be formed from Chairpersons of Committees but to include one female Councillor if possible'.  Councillors now considered whether the wording should be changed to 'Personnel Committee to be formed from Chairpersons of Committees or suitably qualified Personnel Officer and to include one female Councillor if possible'. John Sharp did not like this at all, standing up and stating that, if this happened, "I'll resign as of now. You are altering things to suit the Council. It's corrupt." Mike Hughes explained that the issue was being brought before Council for a decision, as per usual procedure. Deidre Bethune and Gill Edmonson also attempted to pour oil on troubled waters. However, all this seemed to make little difference and John left the Council Chamber.  Ron Bull felt some sympathy with John, believing that Councillors setting the rules for the year then changing them arbitrarily part way through ii was starting down a slippery slope. Mike Hughes declared himself "staggered" by John's reaction. After further discussion, the Standing Order was not changed, the issue instead being deferred to the next annual meeting. 

Blooming competitions 
Councillors decided to enter Olney for the Tindal Cup, the only category in the Best Kept Village competition it can enter this time round, having won the Best Kept Town award last year. Then they decided, as last year, not to enter Olney for Britain in Bloom. 

Conygere tree
As reported in last month's Mercury, 6 Conygere was built close to a large tree which is now threatening to undermine the building's foundations. The tree is on OTC's land and, as the Council has now received a solicitor's letter on the subject, it passed the issue to its own solicitors.  Next Meeting - Monday 4th April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
 
 

Olney Council report for April 2012

Public Participation
No member of the public present wished to speak at this month's meeting. 

Land Purchase 
Mayor Mike Hughes announced that the council had completed the purchase of a piece of land although no details of the land or the purchase price were provided. Subsequent enquiries by Mercury revealed that ii comprises seven acres of land to the south of the Charity Field used by the Football and Rugby Clubs and the aim is to use this for casual recreational use with no formal pitch markings. It is not known when it will be available for public use or what preparation needs to be done, apart from providing an entrance via the Charity Field.

Conygere tree
Mike Hughes reported that following the solicitor's letter received on the subject of the tree adjacent to 6 Conygere, the council's solicitor has responding pointing out "the error of their ways". No response had been received as of yet, he said. 

Fly the flag
The existing flagpole on the front of the Olney Centre is no longer serviceable and needs to be repaired or replaced. One of the options being considered is to replace it with a new lightweight freestanding pole concreted Into the centre of the garden circular planting area, at a cost of approximately £600. Jeremy Rawlings asked why ii was necessary to have a flagpole at the Olney Centre when there are already two on the Markel Place, but Tony Evans pointed out that they are managed by the British Legion. Tony said that in his opinion ii the centre was to have a flagpole then it was important for the council to 'fly the flag'. Mike Hughes said he would like to see the flag flown on special occasions, such as Veteran's Day and the forthcoming royal wedding. One member suggested that perhaps it should be flown when the Clerk, Gill Edmondson was 'in residence'! 

Planning Applications
Olney Town Council is not a planning authority but is consulted about any applications in the parish by Milton Keynes Council. An application has been made for the erection of two 2 bedroom premises at 8 Berrells Court. Steve Clark said that he saw no reason to object to the plans but that there were already issues with the access to Berrells Court from East Street and the council should ask for that to be taken into consideration when MKC consider the application. Deidre Bethune thought It sad that in his pre-application advice the MKC planning officer had found it necessary to comment on the standard of the existing buildings, since the planning authority had passed the plans for their erection in the first place. For information, the officer's actual comment was: "Given a situation where so much has already been given away to developers there is now little left that would amount to a sound basis for discouraging the proposals in this location on conservation grounds. One might argue that the general design or the proposed pair of houses has no discernible regard for context other than aping the general appearance of the existing poorly scaled and detailed terraced dwellings and hence further exacerbating the disintegration of local character, I suppose. As for context, the wider burgage plot form is still respected and some cluttering remnants of ramshackle sheds / garages that are of no discernible interest would be losl • For information, full details of this and all other planning applications can be found at http://publicaccess.millon-keynes.gov. uk/def ault.aspx 

Driftway
Last month Rob Ward, Milton Keynes Council Neighbourhood Manager for Environmental Services, attended the council meeting to give an update on the landscaping plans for the banks of Driftway. This ended with Rob saying that the work was to be done 'in weeks' and certainly before the end of April. Tony Evans said he was pleased to report that within days of that meeting the bank surfaces had been scraped and topsoil and seed applied. Tony suggested that the council write to Rob and thank him for his prompt action. However, pressure would need to be maintained to ensure the success of the scheme he said. 

Market costs (continued) 
As reported last month, the council hires a skip and cleaning service to complete tidying up after the Thursday Market stallholders have left. This costs £322 per week which represents 44% of each stall's weekly rent. As the skip doesn't get particularly full, the Council discussed whether ii and the cleaning service provided were worth continuing with. The discussion resumed this month with Tony Evans explaining that the skip would never be filled to more than half capacity, since it was delivered containing the sweeping machine which drove out at the end of the day to clear up the rubbish. As a result, the Market Place was always left clean and tidy and without this service the obligation would then rest with the stallholders to sweep up. Jeremy Rawlings asked if the stallholders had been asked if they would prefer to keep the skip and cleaner or have a rent reduction. although many felt that they would always opt for a rent reduction regardless of the consequences. Della Cheal asked If the rate charged by the skip supplier was competitive and Mike Hughes said he believed that it was. Tony Evans said he would like representative of the stallholders to attend a meeting with the council, since the council were currently getting very little direct feedback and the proposed stallholders committee had yet to materialise, he said. Eventually it was decided to keep the existing arrangement but review in the event of a price increase by the skip supplier. 

Market Place parking 
Napier Parking, the company that manages the parking restrictions on the Market Place, had informed the council that changes in legislation meant that the wording of the signage would need to be amended and quoted £1300 for the new signs. Tony Evans said that such legislative changes do not occur overnight and Napier should have known about them when they provided the original signs. He did not see why OTC should have to pay for Napier's mistake. Dave Price said he found it offensive that the new wording specifically stated that the parking restriction also applied to disabled drivers, although others though that it was necessary to provide clarification. There was concern from some members that the council are not gelling value for money from Napier and Mike Hughes wondered If they should investigate other contractors, but pointed out rather tongue in cheek that he was not connected with any such companies (presumably In response to a recent letter In The Phonebox!) 

Dave Price 
Dave Price announced that he was standing down and handed his formal letter of resignation to the Clerk. For Information, Dave has served on the council for the last 15 years, including four years as Mayor from 1998 to 2002. Mike Hughes thanked Dave for his service to the council and noted that he would be sorely missed, prompting a round of applause from the rest of the members. Dave then donned a leather flying helmet and goggles (he really did! - Mercury) and walked out quietly into the night to begin a new life as an ordinary citizen of Olney, or possibly a poet ...... 

Next Meeting - Monday 9th May
The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 9th May in the Council Chamber In the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. Olney Town Council Annual Town Meeting will take place on Thursday 28th April 2011 at 7.30pm In the Olney Centre. 
 
 

Olney Town Meeting report for May 2012

The Meeting
The Town Meeting is held yearly and is a chance for the public to learn what the local Police. Olney Town Council and local groups and charities have been doing. Members of the public are welcome to attend and free to ask questions. 

Chairman's report
Mike Hughes started the meeting with his report. He praised the various events and organisations in the Town mentioning, amongst many, the Cherry Fair, Raft Race, Motorama, the Scouts and the Sports Clubs. He felt that the organisations and the volunteers behind them added greatly to Olney's sense of community.  Noting that Olney had won the Best Kept Town award, he thanked both the ground staff and those tending their private gardens. He also explained that Olney Town Council (OTC) had purchased seven acres of land, adjacent to the current sports fields and the allotments, with the aim of using it for recreational and sports use. This would take a few years to achieve due to the surface preparation required. In future years, he said, it also raises the possible return of the Fireworks Night bonfire. 

Environmental Services
Rob Ward, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Neighbourhood Manager for Environmental Services. gave a brief summary of the Rural Neighbourhood Management team's work. It covers the entire rural area of Milton Keynes Borough, two thirds or its geographical area but with a minority of its population. It's the first point of contact for issues such as potholes, bins not being emptied and landscaping issues. When reporting a problem, ring the Environmental Services Helpline on 01908 252570 or surf to www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/street-care 

Police report
Chris Ward gave the Police report. He explained that antisocial behaviour in Olney had declined generally, there'd been increasing numbers attending the Youth Centre and Officers had given talks both there and at local Schools.  The 'highlights' of the crime figures for Olney between April last year and February this year were: 38 violent offences, 2 sexual offences, 8 burglaries, 11 crimes related to vehicles, 5 thefts of pedal cycles, 22 shoplifting offences, 59 theft offences, 57 incidents or criminal damage and 6 drug offences. Overall there were 203 offences, a 28.5% reduction over the same period the year before. 

Recreations and Services Committee 
Committee Chair Tony Evans gave this report. He started by noting that, although the changes made each year by OTC may seem small, the difference made over the approximately 25 years he's been Chair of this committee had been astonishing. This year, changes had included the new play equipment on the Recreation Ground and the new Tennis Court.  Dog fouling continues to be a major issue, and Tony stressed the need to persuade dog owners to pick up their mess. He also gave a little more detail on the planned use of the newly purchased land adjacent to the current sports fields and the allotments. Over the next two to three years, it would be prepared as an area suitable for recreation - not necessarily a formal pitch area. He felt it might be used by Junior sides at the weekends and for kick-abouts, but hoped not to see permanent posts erected there. Take-up of the allotments continues to be very high and, due to vandalism, new gates and fences have been erected near their entrance.  Tony thanked Rob Ward for picking up the issue of the Driftway verges and sorting it out. Six inches of topsoil have since been laid and seeded with grass although, unluckily, there'd been hardly any rain since. The Market Place had seen the addition of two new noticeboards and lour new bins, and Tony felt the parking scheme there continued to work very well.  He concluded by thanking the groundsmen Ian and Richard, Reg Webster for his work on the Cemetery grounds, and Gill and Sandra, the Town and Deputy Town Clerks, for their hard work over the year.

Planning Liaison Committee 
Steve Clark started by explaining that Olney Town Council can only advise on planning applications, this advice being passed to Milton Keynes Council which then makes the decisions. It had been a quiet year due to current economic conditions and the remaining parcels of land suitable for development running out.  He noted that the landlocked area between the end of Moores Hill and Dinglederry had attracted various planning applications over the years. OTC had consistently opposed them, but ii now seemed likely that MKC may leave the way open for development by selling off some land and releasing a restrictive covenant. The details are beyond the scope of this report but are well worth a read so, for a comprehensive description, surf to stephenclark.mycouncillor.org.uk/2011/01/13/moores-hill-development. Either way, Steve concluded by saying that, until a new planning application had been received, there was nothing concrete for OTC to discuss. 

Finance Committee
Deidre Bethune presented a very brief report noting that, again, there'd been no precept raise this year and that the 'Sydney Dix' fund would shortly be renamed the 'Olney Town Council Community Fund'. Its purpose, described by the new name. remains unchanged.  From the handout, the following figures are for the year ended 31st March 2011, with the bracketed figures being for the year before. Total income was £272,000 (£.277,000) and total expenditure £442,000 (£300,000), resulting in an excess of expenditure over income of £169,000 (£23,000). Cash reserves are £363,000 (£526,000). The main difference between this year and last ls the expenditure on land capital of £125,000 (£0), this presumably being related to the purchase of land adjacent to the sports fields. 

Olney Centre Management Committee 
Alan Richardson gave this report, saying that the Centre was vibrant and well used. He explained wryly that, in line with the latest safety regulations, door furniture such as handles and crash bars had been replaced, finally making the doors safe after 137 years of continuous use! New presentation boards, projection screens and a flagpole had been purchased. He concluded by thanking Peter the caretaker, Rob the early morning cleaner and Gill and Sandra. 

Local Groups 
The Cowper and Museum report was very brief, noting that attendance had been higher than last year and thanking OTC for its support. From the handout, admission income was up 2.7% on last year and a surplus of income over expenditure of £800 was made, compared with a deficit of £3200 last year.  The Ann Hopkins Smith Almshouse Charity had seen two properties become vacant, both now taken by new residents. All houses are occupied but a waiting list is maintained. Any elderly Lady with strong Olney connections can apply for an Almshouse by writing to Tony Evans at Olney Park Farm, Yardley Road, Olney.  The British School Charity awards grants to people in Olney aged under 25 engaging in further education beyond A Level or in occupational training. The ongoing very low interest rates mean that, while It used to rely on an annual income in excess of £3,000, current income is less than £400. This makes the Charity effectively dormant.  John Ferris gave a report on the Newport Pagnell and Olney Lions Club. The Club has around 16 members and has raised just over £14,000 and donated £10,000 during the year, the remaining £4,000 being in reserves. All money donated goes to good causes, administration costs being borne instead by club members. Just over half the donations were local, and included ones to the Brooklands Centre in Newport Pagnell and Willen Hospice.  Neill Elliot reported on The Olney Group (TOG). It had been a successful year, with the Duck and Raft Races being well attended (bar the World Cup) and Fireworks Night going exceptionally well. Mainly as a result of the latter, the total income was £9,000 and there was a surplus of income over expenditure of £2,400. TOG also donated £500 to OTC in part recompense for the loss Incurred three years ago when Fireworks Night was hit by exceptionally wet weather. This year's Raft Race will include entertainment from Olney's Got Balls and the MK Friends of the Caribbean. 
 
 

Olney Council report for July 2012

More Public than Members
There were more members of the public than councillors present at the start of this month's meeting, so Mercury was looking forward to an evening of lively debate. 

Public Participation
Jim Middleton Five members of the public spoke at this month's meeting. First to speak was Jim Middleton on the subject or the Olney bypass. Jim read from a statement he had submitted to the Milton Keynes Core Strategy examination hearing. Jim said as a resident of Olney he attended the MK South Midlands Panel but was not allowed to say anything at the examination. The point he had made in the written submission was that all the development of urban areas north, south, east and west of Olney was having a hugely detrimental effect on Olney with traffic getting ever worse. Jim said he was ignored, and the panel in fact allowed no transport schemes, other than those in the then government's short term plans. This was a pathetic response from so called professionals to a long term planning exercise, he said, and in his opinion there can be no stronger case for a bypass anywhere in the country than Olney. Jim's full submission can be downloaded from http://www.milton­ keynes.gov.uk/planning-policy/documents/REP-269971- 3_MiddletonMKlnqdoc1 OlneyBP.pdf  Karen Gilbert Next to speak was Karen Gilbert, owner of Beans Cate in the Market Place, on a subject that was obviously of concern to a number of members of the public present, namely the application by Real Estate Advisors Savills, on behalf of Calle Nero, to open a branch in the building previously occupied by Derby House Saddlery. Karen said hers is a small, independent business which would struggle to compete against a large, national chain. The rates in Olney were the highest of the lour locations where she had branches and while Caffe Nero could absorb high business rates, she could not.  Elaine Baxendale Elaine Baxendale also spoke against the application. She has been an Olney resident for nine years, she said, and one of the attractions of the town is Its small 'quirky' establishments. Local businesses would be certain to suffer, she feat. and questioned whether Olney needed another big concern. There was a need to consider the environment, she said. The planning application was discussed as an agenda item later in the meeting.  Brian Rice Next to speak was Bryan Rice on the continued problems of parking In Oakdown Crescent.  Richard Stone Richard Stone, Bar Manager of The Carlton House Club (formerly Olney Working Men's Club) spoke about the proposal to position a bench outside of the club. For Information, this has been the subject of discussions by the council for many years. Many elderly people have complained that there is no where to sit and rest whist making the long walk along the High Street and the council have been looking to find a suitable location for a bench. Richard said that one of the license conditions of the club was that members should leave the club in a quiet and orderly manner. Although the club has a smoking area within the grounds he was concerned that a bench at the front would encourage members who wished to smoke to sit on the bench and also take drinks with them, which would be against the terms of the license. As a previous licensee of The Bull he knew what problems a bench outside would attract, he said. Added to that he and his family lived above the club with bedrooms facing out on to the High Street and they would be bound to suffer disturbed nights, he said.  George Horncasltle George Horncastle, Secretary of the club spoke next and said whist he accepted that the bench was for the benefit of elderly members of the community it would be bound to attract other people and the club would be blamed for disorderly behaviour of customers leaving adjacent licensed premises.
 
 

Olney Council report for August 2011

Public participation 
No members of the public present (Mercury plus one!) wished to speak at this month's meeting. 

Co-option of members
A vacancy had arisen following the recent resignation of Nigel Birrell and there being no request for an election from the requisite number of the electorate, it fell to the council members present to fill the vacancy by co-option. The two candidates were invited to give a short address to the council to summarise their CVs.  First to speak was David Rumens, who was standing again following his failure to be co­opted to fill one of two vacancies at last month's meeting. David was first elected to OTC in 2008 and served for two years before having to resign due to ill health. Now that his health issues had been resolved David said he would welcome the opportunity of serving the town again as a member of the council. His experience in local government dates back to 1979 when he was elected to South Beds District Council and he has held many positions since. During his last stint on OTC he represented the council at many meetings with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) as he has a keen interest in resolving the enduring problem of high traffic volumes through Olney. He was also instrumental in the battle to keep Olney as a single ward, against the wishes of MKC who wanted to split it into three. He is currently a member of the Neighbourhood Action Group and is proud of his reputation as a 'campaigning councillor', he said.  The second candidate to speak was Tony Summerscales, a civil engineer in the water industry. Although he admitted he had no experience in local government he said that he had a young son and wanted him to grow up in a safe community and he was putting himself forward so that he could get involved in maintaining the town and its community for the enjoyment of the next generation.  A secret ballot then took place with Tony Summerscales receiving the most votes and he was duly elected. Steve Clark thanked David Rumens for his interest. David left the meeting at this point. 

Flood Risk Management 
Bruce Stewart, Senior Planning Officer - Strategic Flood Risk Management for Milton  Keynes Council was present to explain his role, which he has been in since March 2011, and the implications of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 which is gradually being implemented nationally. The current framework was largely established in the 1930s and 40s, he said and, although some updating had taken place, it did not comply with EU legislation and guidance. The new act meant that MKC as the Local Authority were obliged to take over certain flood responsibilities from the Environment Agency (EA) and Dept. for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). MKC has set up a parent Cabinet-led management group and three officer lead working subgroups comprising Strategic Flood Planning, Flood Prevention and Flooding Emergency Response. The principle shortcomings identified thus far are a lack of in-house water, drainage and flood expertise and a shortage of available funding to address problems in those areas. It isMKC's intention to form closer relationships with Parish and Town Councils who may be able to assist in providing information on local water and flood risk management issues, said Bruce. Mayor Steve Clark said that councils were frustrated that developers were allowed to put in planning applications for floodplains and Bruce replied that any applications with flood implications would now be submitted to him.

Localism Bill 
The Localism was introduced to Parliament in December 2010 and seeks to shift much of the decision making of central government to local authorities. Part of the bill deals with the right of communities to submit an 'expression of interest' to the local authority to provide or assist in providing a relevant service on behalf of that authority and that could lead to a transfer of assets from the authority. Steve Clark said that OTC already manages many of its own assets but the bill would widen the scope when it became law. MKC might come under pressure to dispose of some of its local assets such as car parks, the Olney Centre and Emberton Park, he said. In the event of the latter it was unlikely that Emberton Parish Council would be able to afford to manage the park but OTC could consider a joint venture, he suggested. MKC will be running a series of workshops during August and OTC will send representatives with a view to forming a sub-committee. This will doubtless be the subject of discussion at future meeting since in Steve's view it is a massive subject at which OTC should "nibble gently". 

Recreation ground sewage pipe (continued)
As reported last month the sewage pipe connecting the four sports club houses to the main in East Street has collapsed, which is why there is regularly an overflow when functions take place at the clubs, necessitating rodding by the council staff. Alan Richardson said that since the last council meeting he had had two meetings with Anglian Water and they had confirmed that from October 1 st 2011 the section of pipe which had collapsed would become the responsibility of Anglian Water under the new proposal to adopt private sewers and lateral drains. Although any work that Anglian Water deemed necessary would be done free of charge the replacement would not happen immediately, he said. The first time a blockage was reported Anglian Water would attend and rod the drain to unblock it. If it then became a regular occurrence then the gang would report it with a recommendation to consider replacement work. Eventually it would get replaced, he said. Deidre Bethune asked if the council would now reconsider the refurbishment of the Market Place toilets now that this particular problem would be resolved at nil cost to the council. 

Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) 
Deidre Bethune reported that this hugely popular event would take place for the third year running on Saturday September 12th. Last year's event had made a slight loss, she said, and since then the membership of the Chamber of Trade had reduced. In view of these facts she asked if the council would consider underwriting the event in case of financial loss, as they do for the Firework Night run by TOG (The Olney Group). A figure of £1200 was suggested. Ron Bull said that the Fireworks organisers had only found ii necessary to call on the underwriting once in the 20 year history and he was concerned that BOFF might regularly make a loss. Deidre said that BOFF does not have the funds to absorb the loss themselves. Tony Evans said that he had been a member of the BOFF organising committee for its first two years but felt that there was a big difference between BOFF and the Firework Night, which was organised for the Town. BOFF is a commercial event and stall holders make a profit. Although he agreed that it is a fantastic event he said he felt uncomfortable with the request for underwriting. Should the organisers not be looking to the stallholders themselves to make up any loss, he wondered. Mike Hughes said he felt OTC's role should be to encourage trade and visitors to the town and BOFF should be encouraged so he would not want to be part of any refusal. Eventually the requested for underwriting was agreed by a majority vote. 

Stoke Goldington wind turbines application
As reported last month, an application has been received to build 15 wind turbines at Stoke Lodge Farm, Stoke Goldington. Deidre Bethune said in her opinion MKC was in no position to consider this application at present because it does not have a current or adequate policy. Last month Jeremy Rawlings reported that the existing policy had not been updated for some time and MKC had been asked to update it to bring in line with national guidelines. In particular, there was no reference to consideration being given to the proximity of existing installations. There then followed a general discussion about the merits of wind power, in general. Colin Rodden said that he believed sustainable energy is required but wondered if data was available to support it. Deidre said the operating companies refused to publish data about the output of such installations, claiming that it was 'commercially sensitive', so it was impossible to know if they were efficient or not. Jeremy Rawlings said that when there is too much power in the grid it is easier to switch off wind turbines than coal fired power stations so the operators are paid to keep them stationary. Tony Evans said that the incentives to farmers to allow wind farms to be sited on their land were enormous so OTC needed to act quickly if they wanted to stop every farmer around having them. Alan Richardson said that if past experience was anything to go by, once an application was submitted there was nothing that OTC or anyone else could do to stop it. Steve Clark disagreed, saying that the Wind Farm at Petsoe End had been the first application submitted to MKC and that had only been passed by a narrow margin, so it was not a foregone conclusion. Although no formal vote was taken, an informal vote showed that the members were overwhelmingly against the proposal. Full details of the planning application, ref 11/01193/FULEIS can be found at http://publicaccess.milton-keynes.gov.uk/ 

Odds and sods 
The newly acquired field next to the Charity Field has been sprayed and ploughed and needs to be seeded as soon as possible after the end of August. A number of quotes for seeding have been received and the council agreed to a local quote of £1800. At the moment it is just known as 'the new field', so if anyone has a suggestion for a better name please contact the Town Clerk, or send your suggestion to The Phonebox.  Mike Hughes said that a resident had reported human excrement at the top of the children's slide on Johnson's Field the previous Friday. He had personally attended with cleaning equipment and removed it, but the incident had been repeated the next day. Rosemary Osbourne asked Debbie Brock what was happening about the provision of double yellow lines at the entrance to Chantry Rise, as turning right on to Weston Road was extremely dangerous. Debbie replied that the consultation had recently taken place as part of the process, which was ongoing.  Jeremy Rawlings reported that after 24 years of loyal service Cheryl Wilson's position at the Youth Club had been 'outsourced' by MKC. The promised administrator was yet to appear though.  Steve Clark reported that as of that day Ousedale School had become an academy. Mercury assumes that The Phonebox's invitation to the celebrations got lost in the post.  Tony Evan said that the grass banks on Driftway were a mess and asked that they be strimmed. In fact, all local landscaped areas that are the responsibility of MKC are in a similar state, he said.  Steve Clark said that the inaugural concert by the Olney Community Choir at the Parish Church had been incredibly well attended. Also, the inaugural concert of Olney Brass at the Carlton House Club had been a great success, with a specially commissioned piece of music 'The One and Olney' being played for the first time. In recognition of their support OTC had been presented with a framed copy of the music, which would be hung in the Olney Centre.  Next Meeting - Monday 5th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
 
 

Olney Council report for August 2011

Public participation 
No members of the public present (Mercury plus one!) wished to speak at this month's meeting. 

Co-option of members
A vacancy had arisen following the recent resignation of Nigel Birrell and there being no request for an election from the requisite number of the electorate, it fell to the council members present to fill the vacancy by co-option. The two candidates were invited to give a short address to the council to summarise their CVs.  First to speak was David Rumens, who was standing again following his failure to be co­opted to fill one of two vacancies at last month's meeting. David was first elected to OTC in 2008 and served for two years before having to resign due to ill health. Now that his health issues had been resolved David said he would welcome the opportunity of serving the town again as a member of the council. His experience in local government dates back to 1979 when he was elected to South Beds District Council and he has held many positions since. During his last stint on OTC he represented the council at many meetings with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) as he has a keen interest in resolving the enduring problem of high traffic volumes through Olney. He was also instrumental in the battle to keep Olney as a single ward, against the wishes of MKC who wanted to split it into three. He is currently a member of the Neighbourhood Action Group and is proud of his reputation as a 'campaigning councillor', he said.  The second candidate to speak was Tony Summerscales, a civil engineer in the water industry. Although he admitted he had no experience in local government he said that he had a young son and wanted him to grow up in a safe community and he was putting himself forward so that he could get involved in maintaining the town and its community for the enjoyment of the next generation.  A secret ballot then took place with Tony Summerscales receiving the most votes and he was duly elected. Steve Clark thanked David Rumens for his interest. David left the meeting at this point. 

Flood Risk Management 
Bruce Stewart, Senior Planning Officer - Strategic Flood Risk Management for Milton  Keynes Council was present to explain his role, which he has been in since March 2011, and the implications of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 which is gradually being implemented nationally. The current framework was largely established in the 1930s and 40s, he said and, although some updating had taken place, it did not comply with EU legislation and guidance. The new act meant that MKC as the Local Authority were obliged to take over certain flood responsibilities from the Environment Agency (EA) and Dept. for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). MKC has set up a parent Cabinet-led management group and three officer lead working subgroups comprising Strategic Flood Planning, Flood Prevention and Flooding Emergency Response. The principle shortcomings identified thus far are a lack of in-house water, drainage and flood expertise and a shortage of available funding to address problems in those areas. It isMKC's intention to form closer relationships with Parish and Town Councils who may be able to assist in providing information on local water and flood risk management issues, said Bruce. Mayor Steve Clark said that councils were frustrated that developers were allowed to put in planning applications for floodplains and Bruce replied that any applications with flood implications would now be submitted to him.

Localism Bill 
The Localism was introduced to Parliament in December 2010 and seeks to shift much of the decision making of central government to local authorities. Part of the bill deals with the right of communities to submit an 'expression of interest' to the local authority to provide or assist in providing a relevant service on behalf of that authority and that could lead to a transfer of assets from the authority. Steve Clark said that OTC already manages many of its own assets but the bill would widen the scope when it became law. MKC might come under pressure to dispose of some of its local assets such as car parks, the Olney Centre and Emberton Park, he said. In the event of the latter it was unlikely that Emberton Parish Council would be able to afford to manage the park but OTC could consider a joint venture, he suggested. MKC will be running a series of workshops during August and OTC will send representatives with a view to forming a sub-committee. This will doubtless be the subject of discussion at future meeting since in Steve's view it is a massive subject at which OTC should "nibble gently". 

Recreation ground sewage pipe (continued)
As reported last month the sewage pipe connecting the four sports club houses to the main in East Street has collapsed, which is why there is regularly an overflow when functions take place at the clubs, necessitating rodding by the council staff. Alan Richardson said that since the last council meeting he had had two meetings with Anglian Water and they had confirmed that from October 1st 2011 the section of pipe which had collapsed would become the responsibility of Anglian Water under the new proposal to adopt private sewers and lateral drains. Although any work that Anglian Water deemed necessary would be done free of charge the replacement would not happen immediately, he said. The first time a blockage was reported Anglian Water would attend and rod the drain to unblock it. If it then became a regular occurrence then the gang would report it with a recommendation to consider replacement work. Eventually it would get replaced, he said. Deidre Bethune asked if the council would now reconsider the refurbishment of the Market Place toilets now that this particular problem would be resolved at nil cost to the council. 

Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) 
Deirdre Bethune reported that this hugely popular event would take place for the third year running on Saturday September 12th. Last year's event had made a slight loss, she said, and since then the membership of the Chamber of Trade had reduced. In view of these facts she asked if the council would consider underwriting the event in case of financial loss, as they do for the Firework Night run by TOG (The Olney Group). A figure of £1200 was suggested. Ron Bull said that the Fireworks organisers had only found ii necessary to call on the underwriting once in the 20 year history and he was concerned that BOFF might regularly make a loss. Deidre said that BOFF does not have the funds to absorb the loss themselves. Tony Evans said that he had been a member of the BOFF organising committee for its first two years but felt that there was a big difference between BOFF and the Firework Night, which was organised for the Town. BOFF is a commercial event and stall holders make a profit. Although he agreed that it is a fantastic event he said he felt uncomfortable with the request for underwriting. Should the organisers not be looking to the stallholders themselves to make up any loss, he wondered. Mike Hughes said he felt OTC's role should be to encourage trade and visitors to the town and BOFF should be encouraged so he would not want to be part of any refusal. Eventually the requested for underwriting was agreed by a majority vote. 

Stoke Goldington wind turbines application
As reported last month, an application has been received to build 15 wind turbines at Stoke Lodge Farm, Stoke Goldington. Deidre Bethune said in her opinion MKC was in no position to consider this application at present because it does not have a current or adequate policy. Last month Jeremy Rawlings reported that the existing policy had not been updated for some time and MKC had been asked to update it to bring in line with national guidelines. In particular, there was no reference to consideration being given to the proximity of existing installations. There then followed a general discussion about the merits of wind power, in general. Colin Rodden said that he believed sustainable energy is required but wondered if data was available to support it. Deidre said the operating companies refused to publish data about the output of such installations, claiming that it was 'commercially sensitive', so it was impossible to know if they were efficient or not. Jeremy Rawlings said that when there is too much power in the grid it is easier to switch off wind turbines than coal fired power stations so the operators are paid to keep them stationary. Tony Evans said that the incentives to farmers to allow wind farms to be sited on their land were enormous so OTC needed to act quickly if they wanted to stop every farmer around having them. Alan Richardson said that if past experience was anything to go by, once an application was submitted there was nothing that OTC or anyone else could do to stop it. Steve Clark disagreed, saying that the Wind Farm at Petsoe End had been the first application submitted to MKC and that had only been passed by a narrow margin, so it was not a foregone conclusion. Although no formal vote was taken, an informal vote showed that the members were overwhelmingly against the proposal. Full details of the planning application, ref 11/01193/FULEIS can be found at http://publicaccess.milton-keynes.gov.uk/ 

Odds and sods 
The newly acquired field next to the Charity Field has been sprayed and ploughed and needs to be seeded as soon as possible after the end of August. A number of quotes for seeding have been received and the council agreed to a local quote of £1800. At the moment it is just known as 'the new field', so if anyone has a suggestion for a better name please contact the Town Clerk, or send your suggestion to The Phonebox.  Mike Hughes said that a resident had reported human excrement at the top of the children's slide on Johnson's Field the previous Friday. He had personally attended with cleaning equipment and removed it, but the incident had been repeated the next day. Rosemary Osbourne asked Debbie Brock what was happening about the provision of double yellow lines at the entrance to Chantry Rise, as turning right on to Weston Road was extremely dangerous. Debbie replied that the consultation had recently taken place as part of the process, which was ongoing.  Jeremy Rawlings reported that after 24 years of loyal service Cheryl Wilson's position at the Youth Club had been 'outsourced' by MKC. The promised administrator was yet to appear though.  Steve Clark reported that as of that day Ousedale School had become an academy. Mercury assumes that The Phonebox's invitation to the celebrations got lost in the post.  Tony Evan said that the grass banks on Driftway were a mess and asked that they be strimmed. In fact, all local landscaped areas that are the responsibility of MKC are in a similar state, he said.  Steve Clark said that the inaugural concert by the Olney Community Choir at the Parish Church had been incredibly well attended. Also, the inaugural concert of Olney Brass at the Carlton House Club had been a great success, with a specially commissioned piece of music 'The One and Olney' being played for the first time. In recognition of their support OTC had been presented with a framed copy of the music, which would be hung in the Olney Centre.  Next Meeting - Monday 5th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
 
 
Olney Council report for August.... 2011

Public participation 
No members of the public present (Mercury plus one!) wished to speak at this month's meeting. 

Co-option of members
A vacancy had arisen following the recent resignation of Nigel Birrell and there being no request for an election from the requisite number of the electorate, it fell to the council members present to fill the vacancy by co-option. The two candidates were invited to give a short address to the council to summarise their CVs.  First to speak was David Rumens, who was standing again following his failure to be co­opted to fill one of two vacancies at last month's meeting. David was first elected to OTC in 2008 and served for two years before having to resign due to ill health. Now that his health issues had been resolved David said he would welcome the opportunity of serving the town again as a member of the council. His experience in local government dates back to 1979 when he was elected to South Beds District Council and he has held many positions since. During his last stint on OTC he represented the council at many meetings with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) as he has a keen interest in resolving the enduring problem of high traffic volumes through Olney. He was also instrumental in the battle to keep Olney as a single ward, against the wishes of MKC who wanted to split it into three. He is currently a member of the Neighbourhood Action Group and is proud of his reputation as a 'campaigning councillor', he said.  The second candidate to speak was Tony Summerscales, a civil engineer in the water industry. Although he admitted he had no experience in local government he said that he had a young son and wanted him to grow up in a safe community and he was putting himself forward so that he could get involved in maintaining the town and its community for the enjoyment of the next generation.  A secret ballot then took place with Tony Summerscales receiving the most votes and he was duly elected. Steve Clark thanked David Rumens for his interest. David left the meeting at this point.
 

Flood Risk Management 
Bruce Stewart, Senior Planning Officer - Strategic Flood Risk Management for Milton  Keynes Council was present to explain his role, which he has been in since March 2011, and the implications of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 which is gradually being implemented nationally. The current framework was largely established in the 1930s and 40s, he said and, although some updating had taken place, it did not comply with EU legislation and guidance. The new act meant that MKC as the Local Authority were obliged to take over certain flood responsibilities from the Environment Agency (EA) and Dept. for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). MKC has set up a parent Cabinet-led management group and three officer lead working subgroups comprising Strategic Flood Planning, Flood Prevention and Flooding Emergency Response. The principle shortcomings identified thus far are a lack of in-house water, drainage and flood expertise and a shortage of available funding to address problems in those areas. It isMKC's intention to form closer relationships with Parish and Town Councils who may be able to assist in providing information on local water and flood risk management issues, said Bruce. Mayor Steve Clark said that councils were frustrated that developers were allowed to put in planning applications for floodplains and Bruce replied that any applications with flood implications would now be submitted to him.

Localism Bill 
The Localism was introduced to Parliament in December 2010 and seeks to shift much of the decision making of central government to local authorities. Part of the bill deals with the right of communities to submit an 'expression of interest' to the local authority to provide or assist in providing a relevant service on behalf of that authority and that could lead to a transfer of assets from the authority. Steve Clark said that OTC already manages many of its own assets but the bill would widen the scope when it became law. MKC might come under pressure to dispose of some of its local assets such as car parks, the Olney Centre and Emberton Park, he said. In the event of the latter it was unlikely that Emberton Parish Council would be able to afford to manage the park but OTC could consider a joint venture, he suggested. MKC will be running a series of workshops during August and OTC will send representatives with a view to forming a sub-committee. This will doubtless be the subject of discussion at future meeting since in Steve's view it is a massive subject at which OTC should "nibble gently". 

Recreation ground sewage pipe (continued)
As reported last month the sewage pipe connecting the four sports club houses to the main in East Street has collapsed, which is why there is regularly an overflow when functions take place at the clubs, necessitating rodding by the council staff. Alan Richardson said that since the last council meeting he had had two meetings with Anglian Water and they had confirmed that from October 1 st 2011 the section of pipe which had collapsed would become the responsibility of Anglian Water under the new proposal to adopt private sewers and lateral drains. Although any work that Anglian Water deemed necessary would be done free of charge the replacement would not happen immediately, he said. The first time a blockage was reported Anglian Water would attend and rod the drain to unblock it. If it then became a regular occurrence then the gang would report it with a recommendation to consider replacement work. Eventually it would get replaced, he said. Deidre Bethune asked if the council would now reconsider the refurbishment of the Market Place toilets now that this particular problem would be resolved at nil cost to the council. 

Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) 
Deidre Bethune reported that this hugely popular event would take place for the third year running on Saturday September 12th. Last year's event had made a slight loss, she said, and since then the membership of the Chamber of Trade had reduced. In view of these facts she asked if the council would consider underwriting the event in case of financial loss, as they do for the Firework Night run by TOG (The Olney Group). A figure of £1200 was suggested. Ron Bull said that the Fireworks organisers had only found ii necessary to call on the underwriting once in the 20 year history and he was concerned that BOFF might regularly make a loss. Deidre said that BOFF does not have the funds to absorb the loss themselves. Tony Evans said that he had been a member of the BOFF organising committee for its first two years but felt that there was a big difference between BOFF and the Firework Night, which was organised for the Town. BOFF is a commercial event and stall holders make a profit. Although he agreed that it is a fantastic event he said he felt uncomfortable with the request for underwriting. Should the organisers not be looking to the stallholders themselves to make up any loss, he wondered. Mike Hughes said he felt OTC's role should be to encourage trade and visitors to the town and BOFF should be encouraged so he would not want to be part of any refusal. Eventually the requested for underwriting was agreed by a majority vote. 

Stoke Goldington wind turbines application
As reported last month, an application has been received to build 15 wind turbines at Stoke Lodge Farm, Stoke Goldington. Deidre Bethune said in her opinion MKC was in no position to consider this application at present because it does not have a current or adequate policy. Last month Jeremy Rawlings reported that the existing policy had not been updated for some time and MKC had been asked to update it to bring in line with national guidelines. In particular, there was no reference to consideration being given to the proximity of existing installations. There then followed a general discussion about the merits of wind power, in general. Colin Rodden said that he believed sustainable energy is required but wondered if data was available to support it. Deidre said the operating companies refused to publish data about the output of such installations, claiming that it was 'commercially sensitive', so it was impossible to know if they were efficient or not. Jeremy Rawlings said that when there is too much power in the grid it is easier to switch off wind turbines than coal fired power stations so the operators are paid to keep them stationary. Tony Evans said that the incentives to farmers to allow wind farms to be sited on their land were enormous so OTC needed to act quickly if they wanted to stop every farmer around having them. Alan Richardson said that if past experience was anything to go by, once an application was submitted there was nothing that OTC or anyone else could do to stop it. Steve Clark disagreed, saying that the Wind Farm at Petsoe End had been the first application submitted to MKC and that had only been passed by a narrow margin, so it was not a foregone conclusion. Although no formal vote was taken, an informal vote showed that the members were overwhelmingly against the proposal. Full details of the planning application, ref 11/01193/FULEIS can be found at http://publicaccess.milton-keynes.gov.uk/ 

Odds and sods 
The newly acquired field next to the Charity Field has been sprayed and ploughed and needs to be seeded as soon as possible after the end of August. A number of quotes for seeding have been received and the council agreed to a local quote of £1800. At the moment it is just known as 'the new field', so if anyone has a suggestion for a better name please contact the Town Clerk, or send your suggestion to The Phonebox.  Mike Hughes said that a resident had reported human excrement at the top of the children's slide on Johnson's Field the previous Friday. He had personally attended with cleaning equipment and removed it, but the incident had been repeated the next day. Rosemary Osbourne asked Debbie Brock what was happening about the provision of double yellow lines at the entrance to Chantry Rise, as turning right on to Weston Road was extremely dangerous. Debbie replied that the consultation had recently taken place as part of the process, which was ongoing.  Jeremy Rawlings reported that after 24 years of loyal service Cheryl Wilson's position at the Youth Club had been 'outsourced' by MKC. The promised administrator was yet to appear though.  Steve Clark reported that as of that day Ousedale School had become an academy. Mercury assumes that The Phonebox's invitation to the celebrations got lost in the post.  Tony Evan said that the grass banks on Driftway were a mess and asked that they be strimmed. In fact, all local landscaped areas that are the responsibility of MKC are in a similar state, he said.  Steve Clark said that the inaugural concert by the Olney Community Choir at the Parish Church had been incredibly well attended. Also, the inaugural concert of Olney Brass at the Carlton House Club had been a great success, with a specially commissioned piece of music 'The One and Olney' being played for the first time. In recognition of their support OTC had been presented with a framed copy of the music, which would be hung in the Olney Centre.  Next Meeting - Monday 5th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
 
 
 
Mercury's reports for 2012


Olney Council report for Monday 9th January 2012

New Town Clerk
Mayor Steve Clark opened the meeting by wishing all present a happy New Year and welcomed the new Town Clerk, Liam Costello. As reported last month, Liam has seven years' Council experience, previously holding the post of Clerk to Marlborough Town Council. 

Public participation
Gerald Wilson The first person to speak was Gerald Wilson of C.T. Wilson and sons who spoke about the issue of parking in the High Street. This was discussed at last month's meeting with comments being made about the fact that the parking spaces are not marked out, leading to some vehicles parking so as to not make the best use of the spaces available. Gerald said that during the winter months it is necessary to park his coal truck outside of his shop sideways on, due to the length of the vehicle. Although this occupies more than one space it does create a layby of sorts, he said, enabling customers who wish to load coal and other heavy purchases into their cars to pull in. In the past there had been discussions about 'A' boards and displays of goods outside of some shops, he said. Whilst agreeing with Milton Keynes Council's (MKC) ban on 'A' boards, he felt Lhat his display added to the aesthetics of the High Street and it was necessary to display goods to show that the shop was open. He reminded the council that 30 years ago, via the Chamber of Trade, he had obtained an agreement with Bucks County Council, forerunner of MKC, to have a display and as far as he was concerned that arrangement still stood.  Roger Mann Second to speak was Roger Mann, who also wished to express his opinion about High Street parking and in particular the suggestion made at last month's meeting to realign and mark the spaces so that vehicles would have to reverse in to them and then drive out forwards. He reminded the council that last lime markings had been discussed they had decided that it would not be appropriate in the conservation area. The current alignment enabled drivers to spot a space and indicate, albeit belatedly, and pull in lorwards. If the parked cars were 'slewed' the other way it would not be possible to see a space until the driver was level with, or even past, the space. This would lead to drivers looking out of their passenger windows or rear view mirror, rather than the road ahead, he felt. Assuming the following vehicle had left space for the driver to reverse they would then need to complete the manoeuvre quickly so as not to hold up the traffic. A lot of drivers have considerable trouble with reversing and not particularly the elderly, he said. The danger was that the alignment of the traffic on the opposite side of the road would now present a better view of spaces, so drivers would probably pull across and park front-ways in to a space. When they subsequently backed out they would either have to reverse across both lanes ol traffic or find themselves lacing oncoming traffic. In conclusion he said that anything that improves the parking or traffic situation in the town is to be encouraged, but this would do neither, possibly making the latter worse. Gerald Wilson observed cryptically that his truck was probably the only vehicle parked legally in the High Street, anyway, as he left the meeting!

Olympic Games - Olney Celebration
Tony Evans reported on plans by the Baptist and Parish Churches to hold a combined event on the Recreation Ground to celebrate the opening of the Olympic Games on the evening of Friday July 27th. It would be a celebratory, family friendly, community event by the people of Olney for the people of Olney that reflects the aims of the Olympic Village in terms of its sporting and cultural agenda running from 4:30pm to 11 :30 pm. The council agreed to support the event so long as the sports clubs are in agreement but if significant financial support is required then an approach would need to be made to the council in the proper manner. Finance was a recurring theme during this month's meeting. 

Cobbs Garden Surgery - Specialist Nurse for the Elderly 
For a number of years the surgery employed an ex-District Nurse funded by Milton Keynes PCT. Last year the PCT withdrew the funding and it looked as though this valuable service would be lost. At the request of Cobbs Garden Patient Participation Group the Olney Town Council (OTC) had agreed to fund the post for a year at a cost of £13,500. Steve Clark noted with some concern that a journalist from BBC Three Counties Radio had recently visited the surgery and interviewed one of the partners who had given the impression that OTC had declined to renew the funding, due to budget constraints. Steve said that no such decision had been made and ii the journalist concerned had bothered to contact the council or visit the offices whilst he/she had been in town then they could have clarified the situation. Mike Hughes suggested that the partner had probably assumed that funding would not be renewed since the original decision had just been to fund it for a year with no obligation to fund on an on-going basis. 

Continental Market
Traditional Markets Ltd has applied to hold a continental market In Olney on Sunday 18th March. Debbie Brock recalled that there had been a few complaints from the public about lack of pricing signage on some of the stalls when a similar event was held last year. Mike Hughes said that some of the businesses around the market had complained that they had lost most of their trade that day to the market. The general feeling was that the council would support the event but the ofler of £250 from Traditional Markets was insufficient and  £450 should be charged. This was agreed by a majority. After the vote Tony Evans said that he assumed the ban on the selling of hot food would apply, as it did for the Sunday and Thursday markets. Debbie Brock said she thought ii was reasonable to relax this rule for a one-off event but Tony said this would send out the wrong message to the existing market traders and the ban should apply to all such events on the Market Place. Andrew Dooley asked if Tony thought it should also apply to the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) in that easel He proposed that the council agreed to the sale of hot food and the vote was carried by a majority. 

Localism Act - Council Code of Conduct 
Jeremy Rawlings explained the changes that would be necessary for councillors to meet their obligations to promote and maintain high standards of conduct. The key tasks that OTC has to achieve before 31 st March are: 

  • Adopt or amend a Code of Conduct 
  • Adopt or amend a Register of Interests for publication 
  • Set rules (standing orders) for disclosure of interests 
  • Manage standards and ethical governance as part of the wider corporate governance of the Council 
MKC have an existing code which meets these requirements and considers that parish councils will have met their obligations ii they adopt MKC's Code, Register and Rules. Jeremy said that the new rules were considerably more stringent than those currently in place and it would be a criminal offence not to declare an interest in matters coming before the council. A number of councillors round the table will be obliged to be much more open in the information they provide regarding properties and land that they own etc, he said. 

Finance Committee
The Parish Precept (the amount of Olney residents' Council Tax which goes directly to OTC) has been retalned at the existing rate of £147,610 for the last 6 years. This has been achieved by using a reserve of funds that OTC has built up over the 'good' years and Mercury assumes that it was an effort to ease the burden on Council Tax payers during what, at the time, was thought to be an economically difficult period. However, these reserves have now exhausted and the current financial crisis means that there will actually be a deficit next year. Deidre said that the Finance Committee were proposing that the Precept should now be increased by 10%. Ron Bull suggested that it should be less that 10% so that the rest could be recouped in future years and Andrew Dooley said he would find it hard to support any increase, as the council should be cutting expenditure in the same way as householders are having to. Steve Clark closed down the conversation by saying that since this was the recommendation of the Finance Committee the full council and the full council should only be voting on it and questioning discussing it again. A vote was taken and passed by a majority.  Mercury is grateful to Town Clerk, Liam Costello, for providing the following information:  The total Precept will rise by 10% from £147,610 to £162,371. However, due to an increase in the Council tax base figure (which is the number of equivalent Band D Households in the parish) the actual increase to households will be 9.30%. This equates to 10p a week for a Band D property. 

Odds and sods
A quote of £2602 for the planting of summer bedding plants (red, white and blue) to mark the Queen's Diamond Jubilee had been received. Colin Rodden suggested that in the light of the previous item that an alternative quote should be obtained.  (Perhaps it would only be one third of the cost for a single colour, such as red, mused Mercury.) Tony Evans said that there were considerable cost savings obtained by continuity of the existing contract and any alternative contractor would need to do a considerable amount of pre-work which would be bound to be reflected in the quote. The council voted by a majority to accept the quote.  Debbie Brock said that MKC have served notice through the High Court in London to The Planning Inspectorate, Npower and the various Land Owners that they (MKC) have lodged an appeal agalnst the Planning Inspectors Decision to grant permission for the Nun Wood Windfarm .  Rosemary Osborne said that the issue of the path which runs between the bottom of Wagstaff Way and the play park and is liable to flooding should have been discussed at a meeting of MKC on 4th January but was missed off the agenda. She has been assured that it will be discussed in the February meeting.  Tony Evans said that he thought the banks on Driftway were looking 'better' at the moment but doubted that it would continue. The maintenance by MKC had been erratic last year, he said, and he would like a meeting with Rob Ward, MKC Neighbourhood Manager, to find out what the schedule is for this year. It would be a tragedy if what has been done so far is not maintained, he said.  Next Meeting - Monday 6th February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting. or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
 

Olney Council report for Monday 6th February 2012

Public Participation
Paul Watson The first person to speak was Paul Watson, a former Mayor of Olney. Paul had read in last month's Mercury that the Council had Increased its precept, the part of your Council Tax which goes to Olney Town Council (OTC), by 10%. He'd been astonished by this, given that he believed the Council's reserves to be very healthy. During the six years ended 31st March 2009, he stated that Income and expenditure had been under strict financial control, resulting in increases in the cash and bank reserves every year from £195,000 on 31st March 2003 to £386,000 on 31st March 2009, not including the money provided by Milton Keynes Council (MKC) for planning gain and land purchase.  He stated that this financial discipline appeared to have been abandoned and, in each of the years ended 31st March 2010 and 31st March 2011, cash and bank balances had fallen, by in total almost £80,000. Whilst current numbers were only available to the end of December 2011, an extrapolation of those figures to a 12 month period to 31 March 2012 suggested that the same downward spiral was continuing: Even with the 10% Increase in the precept, the Council was staring at an overspend or more than £65,000. Further, he noted that, if the Council had approved the Market Place Toilet renovations, which seemed to be so strongly supported by the Chair of Finance, that would have required a further £38,500, based on OTC's estimates.  Paul felt this was in stark contrast to OTC's staff having been on a pay freeze for three years, bar one Government allowance of £250 paid some time ago. He s1ated that OTC's current spending level was profligate, and that it wasn't too late to reduce spending by instructing the Chair of Finance to rescind the budget approved last month, eliminate the precept increase and prepare a budget which balanced income with expenditure. Members of the Public speaking in this slot are allowed a maximum of three minutes and, in this meeting, the limit was enforced vigorously by Steve Clark. So, Paul didn't get to finish his contribution.  Later In the meeting, Mike Hughes spoke to express his concern about this, and register his disgust at how harshly Steve had called time on the former Councillor's contribution. He felt It was a disgrace. Steve noted his comment.  For information, the minutes of December's Finance Committee meeting show that, of the eight people on the committee, two were absent and, at the vote to set the level of the precept, three voted in favour, one against and two abstained. This proposal was then brought to full Council and finalised.  Carole Russell The second person to speak was Carole Russell, asking the Council to continue part• funding a Specialist Nurse for the Elderly at Cobbs Garden Surgery. The Friends of the Surgery had been campaigning to raise funds but, while they'd raised nearly £2,000, this was nowhere near enough to fund the post. Carole felt that the nurse was a lifeline for the elderly in the area and that, particularly with Olney having a higher than average proportion of elderly people, it would be a travesty if the post could no longer be funded. She concluded by saying that the Friends would not give up raising funds in future and that she was sorry to have to tall back on the Council.  Terry How The third speaker was Terry How, expressing his concerns about the disposal of the land to the rear of 57 - 59 Moores Hill, a topic also covered later in this meeting. Terry felt that c􀁴rtain individuals had pocketed vast sums of money over the sale or the land. He stated that there'd been no representation from Olney's Ward Councillors, who seemed to know what was going to happen in advance of It happening. He was sure that the disposal of the land could have been handled better - it seemed to him to be a case of collusion al MKC, with Olney's Ward Councillors having something to do with ii. He slated that the situation stunk and asked that, If some individuals have made £200,000 to £300,000, how much would go back to Olney residents? He felt that the correct procedures had not been followed by MKC, who are under investigation by the Ombudsman about the issue. Terry fell strongly that a similar situation should not be allowed to happen again, and that OTC had a duty to make sure it didn't. For information, Olney's Ward Councillors are Debbie Brock, absent from this meeting, and Peter Geary, present and seated in the public viewing area. 

Circus
Pinder's Circus is due to visit Olney, with the likely time and place being 7th - 9th May on The Pyghtle. The Council will inform local residents.

Grant Application for Nurse post
Following on from Carole Russell's contribution, this agenda item was for the Council lo decide whether or not to accept a Grant Application for £11,550 which, added to the money raised by the Friends, would fund the Nurse post for another year. Tony Evans and Mike Hughes thought the post was important, were in favour of funding it but nervous that the commitment was open ended. Deidre Bethune S1ated that the Council had budgeted for the funding. Colin Rodden felt that there were certain things that the Council needed to do, but that it mustn't duplicate things that should be done by the Health Authority.  The Grant Application went to the vote, with all voting in favour bar one abstention - the Council will fund the position tor another year.

Land to rear of 57 - 59 Moores Hill
First, some background on this long running issue. Over the years, a number of Planning Applications to build houses on the land to the rear of 57 - 59 Moores Hill have been made and rejected. Now, an Application has been accepted by MKC and, contingent on that acceptance, a developer has purchased two thirds of the garden of one of the Council houses in Moores Hill from MKC, which has also granted an easement for access to the site via a thin strip or its land off Dinglederry. In addition, the developer has purchased part of the garden of a nearby privately owned Moores Hill property, a key area which Joins the access strip with the Council house garden area. The purchase of the two areas of garden, the granting of easement for access and of Planning Permission all come together to create an area of land on which houses may be built.  There were questions as to whether MKC has handled this process correctly, so a complaint was raised In order to discover what happened. MKC complaint investigations can pass through a number of stages - surf to http://bil.ly/z98jJZ for further information. The main findings of Stage two or the investigation were: 

  • There was no evidence of MKC consulting with OTC or OTC's Ward Councillors about the land disposal; 
  • The land was not advertised for sale in an appropriate publication. This was because MKC's Valuer felt that sale to this developer was the only viable option for achieving a development rate for the land, since this developer had already secured the key area of private garden. The Valuer should have set out the justifications for not advertising the land in writing, but appeared not to have done so. 
  • MKC used independent expertise to value the land at a development rate, and secured a price higher than this valuation. 
  • Summary: "In my opinion, the Council ... disposed or the land in accordance with relevant law and largely in compliance with Council Policy, There were some procedural issues which appear to have been missed but in reality these issues are unlikely to have resulted in any different outcome in the disposal." 
Presumably, the investigation had been escalated further, as the Council had received the following letter from MKC: "The outcome of the stage three investigation Into the Council's processes surrounding the disposal of the above property interests concluded that Property Services had not properly administered the processes ln regard to consultation with Town and Parish Councils and their respective Ward Members. Although this maladministration occurred during the time of my predecessor (2010) I should like to apologise for any inconvenience caused to each of you. The protocols put in place ensure that evidence or timely consultation is included as part of the sign-off procedures, such that there Is now no scope for error or omission in the future. Jeremy Rawlings spoke first, having followed the land disposal issue from the start. He felt that Terry How was right - the support given to affected residents had been abysmal. He summarised the letter as saying that, yes, MKC had made a mistake, but that they weren't planning lo do anything much about it. He felt that OTC must make sure the issue gets raised to a higher level. Jeremy stated that the way the land disposal had been handled was wrong, but didn't know how to proceed further. He concluded by saying that the sale of the land was alter an MKC Planning Meeting in which most of the comments were against It yet, when it came to the vote, most Councillors abstained.  Mike Hughes asked Steve Clark, as Mayor, for his views and perhaps an undertaking to investigate possible ways to proceed. Steve agreed with Jeremy but, again, lei! it unclear what the Council could do. Tony Evans stated that OTC needed legal advice, MKC having operated Improperly and against its own protocol by not advertising the land sale. He also noted rumours that the land had since been sold on by the original purchasers lor a massive profit. He explained that OTC had said the situation was wrong from the start, that It should seek legal advice and, perhaps, that it should sue MKC.  Colin Rodden, a lone voice, questioned the validity of one public body suing another in these money-saving times. He also lelt that Olney had to be allowed to grow - houses had to be built somewhere.  Jeremy Rawlings stated that, while one Olney Ward Councillor is related to one of those who'd purchased the land from MKC, there was emphatically no suggestion that either Ward Councillor had done anything wrong.  Investigations after the meeting confirmed that the residents have raised the complaint to the Ombudsman and discovered that, while the Council was unable to raise it in this way, it's investigating other options, including whether it could support the residents' complaint.  Mercury thanks Jeremy Rawlings and other Councillors who've provided background for this section and helped ensure its accuracy. 

Grant Application for Youth Centre 
Jeremy Rawlings gave a brief introduction, saying that the Youth Centre was applying for a grant or £1,250, the salary of a professionally qualified Youth Worker for two sessions per month, for the year starting April 2012. The Council funded the post last year and the sessions have proved very popular with around 50-60 children attending.  Mike Hughes asked if the Youth Centre had tried to obtain funding elsewhere. Jeremy said that ii hadn't, noting that MKC doesn't fund these sessions tor Under 13s. Mike suggested that perhaps the session entry fee should be increased from 60p to £1.60 per person, thus covering the cost. Tony Evans felt that the Grant Application was very good value for money and that, with some people spending time criticising young people In the area, the Youth Club was doing something positive to help. Deidre Bethune concurred, saying that OTC needed to fund the sessions. A vote was taken and passed with all in favour bar two abstentions - the Council will pay the grant.

Bits 'n' bobs
MKC is running meetings to explain the process of Community Asset Transfer, in which it plans to transfer some of the assets it owns lo more local ownership. Peter Geary spoke briefly from the public gallery to clarify the purpose of these meetings. As Alan Richardson noted and Peter Geary confirmed, the Olney Centre is not one of these assets - it's not MKC's to transfer.  Some funds arising from the Petsoe End Wind Farm development are becoming available. with £7,000 assigned to the Olney Parish. This money must be allocated towards schemes "for the promotion, installation and education of renewable energy or energy saving measures" in the Parish. OTC will send a representative to the next meeting of the Community Development Liaison Committee, set up to administer these funds. 

Parking
The Council had received a letter from a local business asking that the Market Place Car Park time limit be increased from three to five hours. The Council refused this request for reasons including three hours being long enough, there being longer stay spaces in the town and the cost of changing the signage.  In the Cattle Market Car Park, a single parking bay is reserved for turning. However, Mike Hughes noted that it's often heavily encroached on by the vehicle in the next space, thus leaving insufficient angle for vehicles to turn. This results in cars having to back out of the Car Park onto the main road - hardly ideal. MKC has suggested increasing the reserved area to two bays, thus allowing cars to turn more easily. The Council ag.reed with this suggestion.

Olympics event 
As reported in earlier Mercury articles, the local Churches are organising an event on 27th July to coincide with the Olympics· Opening Ceremony. Tony Evans noted that this was progressing and that, once the finances had been estimated properly, the organisers must be encouraged to put a proper proposal to OTC. He felt ii would be a fantastic event, if it could be made to work.  Next Meeting 5th March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
 

Olney Council report for March 2012

Public Participation
Terry How The only person to speak at this month's meeting was Terry How, once again speaking about the disposal of the land to the rear of 57-59 Moores Hill. Much of Terry's statement was a reiteration of what he had said at last month's meeting and he noted that while the Ombudsman was now looking into the handling of the matter, none of his questions from last month had been answered. He repeated his assertion that the whole matter ·stinks" and said there appeared to be no transparency from the councillors who should be representing the residents. Mercury assumed that this was directed at the Milton Keynes (MKC) councillors, rather than Olney Town Council (OTC). He said that this was the "thin edge of the wedge for Olney" and, noting that the matter was on the agenda to be discussed when the public and press had been excluded, said that he thought it should be discussed in an open forum. Deidre Bethune asked why It was being discussed in private session and Town Clerk Liam Costello explained that OTC had sought advice from their solicitors which was confidential, at present. Although no discussion normally takes place in the public participation slot, Mayor Steve Clark said that he would allow some discussion to take place, but not regarding the solicitor's advice. It might be possible to communicate this advice to the residents once this had been discussed in the closed session, he said. Jeremy Rawlings said he had spent some lime working with the residents and MKC officers and, while the third and final stage of MKC's complaints procedure had found some shortcomings, it was by and large legal. OTC is not permitted to formally support the residents' complaint to the Ombudsmen, he said. Tony Evans noted rumours that the developer was now looking to buy additional land and build up to six houses. There had been no response to OTC's concerns about drainage, Highways impact in Dinglederry, loss of trees subject to Tree Preservation Orders and overlooking of houses in Moores Hill, he said. Steve Clark said that there were some questions around the procedures adopted for the land sale. When previous planning applications for the land had been submitted the MKC Planning Officers had agreed with OTC's recommendation that It should be rejected. However, this time round an officer had recommended approval and under such circumstance the Planning Committee is obliged to have good reason to ignore the advice of Its own officer in order to overturn this recommendation. Even ii this were to happen an appeal by the developer would usually be successful, he said.  Mercury is grateful to Steve Clark for providing the following Information regarding the Solicitors' advice: The gist of the legal advice was that it would be very unwise for the Town Council to contemplate Instigation of a judicial review into the matter as it would prove lo be extremely expensive and risky and would be hard to justify on the basis that MKC had 'generally followed the correct procedure'. Members were all of the opinion that they could not possibly justify spending a massive sum of public money to pursue this case given the very high risk that it could go against Olney Town Council.

Hot food at Thursday and Sunday Markets 
In the past OTC has always rejected requests from market traders to sell hot food on the Sunday and Thursday markets, not only because they didn't want to see things like burgers and hot dogs on sale but also in order to protect the interests of the businesses around the Market Place. Following a recent market where one of the traders had apparently ignored this rule, there had been some feedback at the Recreations and Services Committee meeting about how popular the product on sale had been because it was something different that was not regularly available In the area. Tony Evans reported that the Recreations and Services Committee was now recommending that this rule should be rescinded, subject to certain conditions. Deidre Bethune questioned the actual proposal from the R&S meeting, saying that she thought the recommendation from that meeting was to ·consider· rather than to  'allow'. (For information, the minutes of that meeting show that no vote was actually taken). Tony said that any trader wishing to sell hot food would have to apply in advance and comply with strict conditions. Mike Hughes was in favour of the proposal and said if anyone flouted the new conditions they would be ordered to leave immediately. A vote was taken and passed by a majority with two members voting against.  As an aside, Town Clerk Liam Costello suggested that sub-committees should be more autonomous and not be obliged to take every decision to the full council in order to get it approved. Mercury understands that this is common practice with many other local councils, such as Newport Pagnell, and would certainly overcome the frustration expressed by councillors in the past that, having fully discussed and agreed a course of action at a sub-committee, it is then discussed again at length by the full council. 

Milton Keynes wind turbine policy 
The council has been sent a copy of the document Draft Wind Turbines Supplementary Planning Document and Emerging Policy: Wind Turbines Planning Applications for comment, and also a request from the Chair of Castlethorpe Parish Council, Philip Ayles, to support the policy. Philip's letter noted that the existing policy is over 10 years old and was written when turbines were half the height they are today, which is typically 125m (the height of the local turbines at Petsoe End). In fact 200m turbines exist and plans for the first 1000m turbines were recently announced. Much of the policy is around the minimum separation distance between wind farms and housing. The policy is available at www.millon-keynes.gov.uk/wind-turbines and the public are invited to comment, although the consultation period officially ends on 28th March 2012. Unfortunately these documents were sent out in early February and were on the OTC agenda in March but this report will not appear until the end of that month.

Milton Keynes Transport Strategy Review 
MKC has written to the council asking for comments on the Transport Strategy Review. The policy is available at www.millon-keynes.gov.uk/transport/ and the public are Invited to comment, although the consultation period is even lighter, officially ending on 23rd March 2012.

Parish Partnership Fund 
This fund is granted by MKC to local councils to enable them to apply for funding of up to 50¾ for improvements or facilities which they wish to provide in their local area, and applications are now being invited. Tony Evans noted that the path into the cemetery needed upgrading, while Deidre Bethune suggested improvements to the roadway to the allotments. Mike Hughes suggested the current hedge laying work that is taking place on Crouch's Field (previously known as 'The New Field'). John Boardman noted that some items of play equipment had been removed from the recreation ground for safety reasons, although Steve Clark said that a similar scheme, the Play Area Improvement Scheme existing specifically for such reasons and MKC was also inviting applications for funding under that scheme. It was agreed to get quotes for the suggestions which will presumably be discussed at a future meeting. 

Parish Meeting
This has traditionally taken place in April so that in an election year, such as this, the outgoing council are able to present the annual accounts prior to the start of the new council year, although Uam Costello said that this is not actually a formal requirement. The election for the new council will take place on 3rd May so it was decided to hold the Town Meeting on 26th April. Liam questioned whether the closeness of the two events might impinge on the members ability to 'go knocking on doors' but the opinion of some councillors was that if the electorate could actually be bothered to turn up at the meeting then it would save them the trouble! Mercury is usually almost as lonely at the Town Meeting as he is at the monthly OTC meetings, so ii you want the chance to meet your councillors before the election and question them on anything you like, please come along. 

Odds and Sods 
Tony Evans reported that Crouch's Field is looking good and the council workers have done an excellent Job, particularly with the fencing, The hedge laying is coming along well, also. He invited any councillors (and presumably the public as well) to go along and have a look.  Steve Clark reported on the recent meeting of the Emberton Park Liaison Group. There is concern about car movements in the park and the 10 mph speed limit is not well observed. A one way system is being considered, with two way traffic being permitted up to the cafe, he said. The downside of this would mean that access to the Sailing Club would result in a large circuit of the park, though. Consideration is also being given to extending the season for the static caravans, he said.  Rosemary Osbourne reported that MKC had now approved the work required to resolve the Issue of the path which runs between the bottom of Wagstaff Way and the play park that is liable to flooding. Work would commence in May and is due to be completed by August.  Mike Hughes reported 1hat a recent survey conducted by the Neighbourhood Action Group showed that the main issues concerning the residen1s of Olney were: 

1. Traffic congestion 2. Parking 3. Dog fouling

all of which came as a surprise to precisely no one, suspected Mercury.  Next Meeting - Monday 2nd April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, ii they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides Is appropriate. The Town Meeting will take place on Thursday 26th April and members of the public are invited to attend and question the council on any matters concerning them. Remember. it's your opportunity to make your voice heard and it's no use complaining that you don't know any of the people behind the names on your ballot paper or you don't agree with what your hard earned money is being spent on ii you don't attend. 
 

Olney Council report for April 2012

Filled to capacity
The council chamber was filled to capacity by members of the public this month, many eager to speak about the plans to build houses on land to the rear of two houses in Moores Hill or listen to the council debate on the matter. The possibility of two more properties to the rear of a further house has inflamed the situation even further. 

Public Participation
Sue Warren The first person to speak was Sue Warren, once again addressing the council on the matter of parking in Oakdown Crescent. Sue said that the situation had worsened as two more nearby residents had recently passed their driving test. She asked Mayor Steve Clarke why he had not responded to a request for action some years ago from MP Mark Lancaster's assistant to himself and Graham Mabbutt when they had been Milton Keynes Council (MKC) ward councillors. (For information, Steve has informed Mercury that neither he nor Graham have any record or recollection of such a request being made). She criticised the council for addressing parking issues elsewhere in the town, quoting the erection of signs to dissuade drivers from parking near Crouch's field, whilst ignoring the plight of the residents of Oakdown Crescent. She criticised the Town Clerk for not following up a letter written in November to Richard Duffill, MKC Traffic and Parking Team Leader, and also Richard himself (who was not present) for not responding to any of her letters or emails, but suspected that the reason for that was her mother giving him a 'hard time' when he had visited to investigate the situation. Finally she criticised MKC Councillor Debbie Brock for not following up a request for information from the Ambulance Service after an incident where an ambulance had not been able to park close to the house of a sick resident. She challenged the councillors to take action and reminded them that it is an election year and there are 20 elderly residents who need their support to have a good end to their life instead of living in a car park.  Chris Kitchener Chris Kitchener spoke on behalf of the residents of Dinglederry about the plans to build additional housing using the rear gardens of some houses in Moores Hill with access via Dinglederry. Chris said that a number of applications had been made over the years for two houses, five houses and lastly three bungalows, all of which had been rejected. The latter had been the subject of an appeal to the Planning Inspectorate in Bristol. The residents had been supported by both OTC and MKC in those objections and in July 2002 MKC had placed a preservation order on trees in the gardens. In July 2004 she and her neighbours in Dinglederry had been approached by a firm of property developers with a request to purchase eight metres of their gardens to enable access to the gardens in Moores Hill but had turned down a considerable offer because they loved their existing rural outlook. She concluded by saying that the Government have stated that they want local people to have more say in the development of their localities and asked that they be listened to. Nick Shipton Next to speak on the subject was Nick Shipton. Please note that the following transcription is based on a statement read by Nick and The Phonebox cannot vouch for the accuracy of its content. Nick stated that as a result of the Stage 3 complaint which the residents had raised with MKC, they now had a letter and apology which stated that the sale of the council land and the easement of the 'ransom strip' was not carried out according to policy and process and was unlawful. He said that MKC had admitted that the land was sold illegally to the developer and was now considering compounding the situation by allowing further houses to be built. The original developer had since sold on the gardens on to a builder at a huge profit, he said, but local government law does not allow ex-council land to be sold on undeveloped. He also had a letter from Peter Smettem, Valuer to MKC, which stated that the easement over the council owned strip would be limited to three dwellings and another letter from Richard Jenden, Estates Manager, confirming this to be the case. This commitment should be upheld as promised, he said. The granting of the previous application will have a devastating consequence to many families living in Dinglederry and any further building in the area would ruin other families' home lives, including his own. The developer was not providing valuable services to Olney through the building of social housing, but was merely looking to make money. Due to the family relationship of the original developer to both of Olney's MKC ward councillors (Debbie Brock and husband Peter Geary) the residents will, again, not have the benefit of a ward councillor to support them, he said. With the previous application they were only able to secure the services of a 'proxy' councillor (i.e. a councillor with no interest from another ward) a week before the meeting at which the planning permission was granted.  Terry How The last person to speak was Terry How, who had spoken at the two previous meetings. He was highly critical of the two ward councillors, making a number of accusations, and called for them both to resign. In view of the forthcoming MKC elections and libel laws of this country, The Phonebox has decided not to report these accusations. 

Easement to rear of 59 Moores Hill 
This was the formal agenda item for the council to discuss this matter. The interested members of the public were still present for this item and some attempted to join the debate, but Mayor Steve Clark was strict in imposing the Standing Order which forbids this. Jeremy Rawlings informed the council that an application had been received for a further easement of the MKC owned access strip, as discussed in the public participation section of the meeting. This was not unexpected he said, as previous applications had included development to the rear of 61 Moores Hill. He said the whole thing was steeped in mystique and bad dealings and felt that MKC should be bought to account. He was frustrated that no one at MKC was being brought to account for the original mistakes in the consultation process. Deidre Bethune said that there was no point in objecting as MKC would just ignore the recommendation of OTC. Mike Hughes thought that the Mayor and Town Clerk should make an official and personal representation stating OTC's objection rather than proffering it in a 'limp' way. He felt it was time that OTC was listened to prior to the easement being debated. Background details should be provided pointing out that MKC has admitted previous wrong doing, he said. Town Clerk, Liam Costello, reminded members that MKC had admitted its previous mistakes but has been advised by its solicitors that it had not acted illegally so the only subject currently up for debate was the extension to the easement. Jeremy said that if OTC had a spare £1 00k it could take on MKC and probably win, but unfortunately it didn't. Steve Clark compared the situation with the strategy of a certain major supermarket chain when dealing with objections to planning permissions. Ron Bull suggested harnessing the power of the local media to point out that MKC had broken its own rules and the general consensus was that this was a good idea and should be investigated. 

Church Community Festival for Olympics
As reported previously, the combined Baptist and Parish Churches plan to hold an event on the Recreation Ground to celebrate the opening of the Olympic Games on the evening of Friday July 27th. It would be a celebratory, family friendly, community event by the people of Olney for the people of Olney that reflects the aims of the Olympic Vision in terms of its sporting and cultural agenda, running from 4:30pm to 11 :30 pm. The intention is that the event should be self­financing through proceeds from takings, together with sponsorship and donations from organisations. To that end the organisers have requested a grant of £2056 from OTC and an underwriting sum of £660 to cover the hire of toilets. In view of recent criticism of council spending the council decided not to agree to the grant outright but agreed on a majority vote to underwrite the event to the value of £2,716 to cover the costs of the marquee and toilets. The money will be paid by instalments to cover any costs when they incur, and is to be repaid if the event generates a surplus. 

Community Parking Fund
This fund is managed by MKC with the aim of providing additional parking availability in established residential areas and is delivered in partnership with Parish and Town Councils. The maximum award is normally £30k per Parish/T'own Council per year and a maximum of three applications may be made by each Parish, although the Parish is expected to contribute 50% of the costs. Tony Evans reported on two plans, the first to increase the number of spaces in the East Street (Rugby Club) car park and the second to provide a new car park at the East Street end of the Nursery Field (football pitch). At the moment there is a central dividing kerb, with two rows of perpendicular parking either side of it. There is a considerable amount of space between the rows of bays which often results in cars parking in the middle blocking access to and from the marked bays. It is proposed to remove the central kerb, moving the rows towards the pitch with the bays at 45 degrees, which should allow one, or possibly two, rows of additional parking. The second plan involves the creation of a new parking area behind the football pitch at the East Street boundary, to provide an additional 36 spaces. Mercury understands that a six foot high fence will be erected for protection. A vote was taken with a majority voting in favour of making two applications for funding under the scheme. The council is keen to hear views of residents and details of the proposals, including plans, can be viewed at the offices in the Olney Centre during normal offices hours of 9:00am to 4:00pm Monday to Thursday, and 9:00am to 3:00pm on Friday.

Market waste skip 
Councillors had noted that little waste is placed in the weekly skip and that the automatic sweeper is no longer used. This is an annual cost to the OTC of £16750. The last meeting of the Rees and Services Committee had recommended that the provision of a skip be discontinued and the market traders asked to clear their pitch at the end of the day and take their rubbish away. Tony Evans reported on a subsequent meeting with the market traders to discuss the issue where Neil Bowditch had managed to obtain a quote for a basic open top skip for £8060 per year. The council voted by a majority to have a six month trial and Debbie Brock thanked Neil for his initiative.

Emptying of dog waste bins 
There are currently 39 dog bins in Olney which are emptied on Monday each week, with a second collection on Thursday between the months of April and September (Mercury assumes this is in order to avoid unpleasant odours, rather than the impact of hot weather on the canine metabolism). The current contactor has quoted £2.69 plus VAT per bin for the first empty and £1.34 plus VAT for the second empty for an eight year contract running up to March 2020. The council consider this good value for money and agreed to renew the contract. 

Disclosure of Interest 
Town Clerk, Liam Costello, provided a summary of a document issued by the National Association of Local Councils (NALC) regarding members' conduct and the registration of and disclosure of their interests, as defined in the Localism Act 2011. The Act provides that every relevant authority in England is under a duty to promote and maintain high standards of conduct by its members and co-opted members and in doing so must adopt a code of conduct. The definition of co-opted member covers non­councillor members of sub-committees and joint committees who are entitled to vote at meetings. This would include such groups as the Dickens of a Christmas Committee, said Liam. The lack of a declaration of interest is now considered a criminal offence, he said. Mercury noted that the offence carries a potential fine of £5000 and/or disqualification for up to five years.

Odds and Sods
Representatives of OTC will in future be entitled to issue parking tickets themselves for parking violations on the Market Place on days when parking is prohibited, such as market days. The tickets will be enforced by its contractor, Napier Parking.  Deidre Bethune said she thought the thick yellow bus stop markers painted by MKC are an eyesore and noted that complaints had been received from members of the public.  Alan Richardson noted that parking around The Knoll was becoming a problem and suggested that double yellow lines should be provided.  Mike Hughes reported that he would be standing down at the forthcoming elections and thanked the council for an enjoyable time, including his two years as Mayor. Steve Clark thanked him for his valuable contribution.  The recent continental market was not judged to be a success. The food was of very poor quality and the whole event was described as scruffy and down at heel. Jeremy Rawlings noted that the German Sausage vendor was a burger van and Tony Evans said that the traders left all of their rubbish at the end.  Next Meeting - Monday 14th May The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 14th May in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. The Town Meeting will take place on Thursday 26th April and members of the public are invited to attend and question the council on any matters concerning them
 

Olney Council report for May 2012

Public Participation
Kevin Osborne The first person to speak was Kevin Osborne, representing lhe Olney and Clifton Reynes Fishing Association. Over 30 years ago, the Association built a set of walkways and small bridges alongside the river between the Mill and Doff's Field in order to improve access for its members. Over time, the riverside walk has become taken for granted by the Public and, while the Association has no problem with non­members using the structures, this usage increases wear and tear. As such the Association is asking if they could contribute towards what has become a town facility, either by supplying materials or reducing the Association's rent.  Mike Hughes Mike Hughes, who's just stepped down as the Councillor, spoke very briefly to wish the Council and residents of Olney good fortune and a successful year.  Samantha Tomlin Samantha Tomlin, of the Olney Chamber of Trade (CoT), had asked the Council for permission for the CoT to use the Market Square on Friday 14th and Saturday 15th September for the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF). This topic and that of the next speaker were to be discussed later In the meeting.  Paul Collins Finally, Paul Collins, a Trustee of the Cowper and Newton Museum, noted that ii was hosting a number of events starting on Sunday 16th September. On that day, the High Sheriff of Buckinghamshire will be starting a Charity horse ride from the North to the South of the County and. with Olney being pretty much at the Northernmost lip, the ride is starting from the Museum. 

Elections 
This was the first meeting of this year's Council, so ii started with various elections. Steve Clark was re-elected as Mayor with Jeremy Rawlings continuing as his deputy, both posts being uncontested. The committee Chairs stayed as last year although Deidre Bethune, absent this evening, had noted that, If anyone else wished to lake over as Finance Committee Chair, she'd be more than happy for them to do so. The Committee will elect its own Chair at its first meeting. 

Storage unit licences 
The storage units on the Recreation Ground are rented to The Olney Group (TOG), Olney Rugby Club and Olney Colts Football Club. The licences are due for renewal and, following advice from a Solicitor, they've been tightened up somewhat and, to reduce administration, now have a five year upper limit on their duration. 

Big Olney Food Festival 
As you may have noticed, the High Sheriff's horse ride will be starting one day after the BOFF. As such, the CoT and the Museum plan to coordinate and, after a brief discussion involving Councillors and, with Standing Orders temporarily suspended to allow it, Samantha and Paul, it seemed like this would work out well. The CoT offered either to have the BOFF Marquees taken down on the Saturday night, leaving the Square free for the ne-xt day, or to leave them up for the Sunday, allowing the Museum to use them with, if desired, some food stalts. This item concluded with the CoT being given permission to use the Market Square for 48 hours from midday Friday 14th September.

Chantry Rise play area 
As reported before, the lower footpath in the Chantry Rise play area is liable to flooding. To alleviate this problem, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) has proposed building a boardwalk over much of this path, similar to those in Emberton Par1<. Councillors liked this and, after a short discussion, it was approved. Debbie Brock concluded by thanking the Neighbourhood Action Group for its help pushing this through. 

Olney Middle School Car Boot Sale 
The Friends of Olney Middle School have asked the Council for permission to use the East Street Car Park to host a Car Boot Sale in the summer to raise funds for the School. Tony Evans started by noting that, while he didn't want to be a killjoy, the Council had always refused requests to use this Car Park for non-parking purposes. Steve Clark asked where people attending the Sale would park. Other possible nearby venues included the area between East Street and the nearby goalposts on the Recreation Ground - that which may in any case soon become a Car Park. After further discussion, a consensus was reached. The Council agreed in principle to support the event, and to hold discussions with the School about precisely where to hold it. 

Dickens of a Christmas
Introduced by Alan Richardson, this item was to request a budget increase for Dickens of a Christmas (DoC). In essence, Alan wanted to increase the entertainments budget from £3,000 to £4,000 in order to provide more to see along the High Street - the aim being for the event lo be continuous between the Amaya restaurant and the Market Square. Councillors voted to accept this request - this was a major event which deserved the backing.  Peter Geary, while in favour of the increase, noted that it must be round without increasing the overall budget for the current financial year, currently projected to overspend by £65,000. In other words, other things would have to be trimmed to compensate. Liam Costello noted that recent budgets had underspent compared with initial projections. Peter replied that the budget should be redrafted in order to make It realistic. 

Sound and lights 
Alan Richardson noted that the Olney Centre sound system, around 20 years old, had failed and, with that affecting bookings, the amplifier had been replaced by local company Impact.  The Council had budgeted £2,250 this year towards the ongoing replacement of the lamppost-mounted Christmas light curtains with more efficient LED versions. Councillors approved this expenditure and, with some local shops offering to make contributions to the local community, will see if that could make it possible to replace them more quickly.  The Jubilee Beacon lighting is being organised by a group of Councillors and one of the TOG members. It will be Iii at 10.1 Spm on 4th June. For more information on the Beacons Which will be lit around the UK, surf to http://bit.ly/Kg6YVX. 

Development publicity
Following on from Terry Howe's question at the Town Meeting, Ron Bull asked Liam Costello for the latest information on the Moores Hill development issues. Much as before, Liam replied that the Council was still waiting on MKC for an update and that, while publications had been made aware of the issues, he couldn't force them to publish them. 

Long grass
Tony Evans noted that the last lime MKC had cut the grass around Olney was 6th April, with the next cut being due for 18th May, six weeks later. He felt this was totally unacceptable. He concluded by comparing the schedule with those of previous years: Last year there were eight cuts, one every four weeks, while In the year before there were 13.  Next Meeting - Monday 11th June The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 11th June in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
 

Olney Council report for June 2012

Public Participation
Sue Warren First to speak was Susan Warren. chasing for progress with the ongoing parking problems in Oakdown Crescent, asking about the outcome of the site meeting held on the 8th May and for any news on a letter concerning the issue sent to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) last November. She also brought some old letters, including one from Newport Pagnell RuralDistrict Council to Weston Road _ residents dated November 1968 which stated that the "tuming space, in Oakdown Crescent, is not to be used for long term parking and your cooperation to ensure this is so, is requested'. Susan concluded by saying that the Oakdown Crescent residents deserve better and that she would not give up.  Debbie Brock Debbie Brock responded that the site meeting had been on behalf of MKC officers working on several proposals to improve parking in the area but that the process would take time. Susan claimed that Debbie was not informing people of progress. Debbie concluded thisitem by explaining that there was nothing - to say but. when there was, she'd say it.  Barry Edwards Last to speak was Barry Edwards of Dodo Antiques, giving background on road closures he'd requested for consideration in this meeting. In summary, the closures are for the length of road between 2 and 8 Silver End for the daytime of various weekends over the summer for the purpose of charily fundraising antiques fairs. 

Bits n Bobs
Tony Evans and Ben Brock were not present, having sent their apologies.  Tony had sent a letter explaining that, following recent rainfall, the pitch between the Football Club and East Street was too soft for heavy vehicles and, thus, unsuitable for the fair due lo arrive on Monday 18th June. So, regrettably, his letter recommended that the Council cancel the fair In order to avoid the risk of serious damage lo the ground. Councillors agreed.  Debbie Brock noted that the April grass cutting date given In last month's meeting, and  reported by Mercury, was incorrect. e correct dale ls in fact 16th - 17th Apnl, ,:ti ten days later than given, meaning that the lime between cuts was shorter than claimed.  Councillors briefly discussed then agreed Barry's request for Silver End road closures over the summer. 

Moores Hill development - part one 
This item was to discuss correspondence from MKC regarding the easement to the land to the rear of Moores Hill from Dinglederry and, having earlier declared personal and prejudicial interests, Debbie Brock and Peter Geary left the meeting.  Jeremy Rawlings started the discussion, feeling that the decision, at Peter Geary's request, to split the single agenda item covering the development Into two parts was not ideal because the parts were not separable. He noted that John Bint, the Ward Councillor who'd represented residents' views at the Development Control meeting, had done a good job. After further discussion In which every Councillor who contributed appeared unhappy with the whole issue, bar Steve Clark who took more of a chairman's role, Councillors decided to note their displeasure and to make furtherrepresentations If and when a Planning.  Application for the land is received.

Moores HIii development - part two 
Having earlier declared only a personal interest in this item, which was to discuss the Ombudsman's Reports, Debbie and Peter retumed to the meeting.  As background, there were two Reports. The first responded to a nearby resident's complaint that MKC had failed to properly process a transaction involving the sale of Council owned land and that, as a result, he missed out on the opportunity to bid for the land. The second responded to another nearby resident's complaint that in addition to a similar MKC failing, MKC was at fault for the grant of an easement over the access to that land. He'd also claimed that a survey of Great Crested NeW1s should have been arranged and that incorrect information about Tree Preservation Orders had been presented to the Development Control Committee.  The Ombudsman's decision on the first Report was that there was no requirement !or MKC to advertise the land for sale but that rt should have consulted with Olney Town Council alternative (OTC) uses and for its the Ward Councillors about alternative uses for the land, a failing which MKC had acknowledge,cL The Ombudsman felt that the complainant had not suffered significant injustice because, even if his views on alternative uses for the land had been heard, the price obtained by the Council for the land reflected its development value and took into account the easement and, thus, would have exceeded and provided better value than any otter made by the complainant. The decision concluded with the Ombudsman saying that he needn't be further involved with the complaint.  The decision on the second Report was broadly similar, though also noting that MKC had behaved correctly regarding the ecological points. This decision concluded with the Ombudsman discontinuing his office's involvement in the complaint.  Back to the meeting, Jeremy Rawlings felt that, once again, the Reports had indicated errors in MKC's handling of the land sale but that the Ombudsman had ignored them. Peter Geary felt differently and, starting with "I wasn't going to say anything but...", gave his views. He felt that OTC had received a one sided recollection of what had taken place. The facts were that the Ombudsman had  identified some failings, for which MKC had apologised, but concluded that these _failings  had not changed the overall outcome. Pet r felt there'd been one main failing - that 􀂡neither OTC nor them as Ward Councillors had been notified - but that much debate had taken place in OTC and in the town. However, the Obmudsman's Reports were from an independent, unbiased body with no axe to grind. He concluded by noting a concern that, with OTC having taken legal advice in this case due lo requests from concerned residents, a precedent could have been set for how it handles similar requests in future.  Andrew Dooley pointed out that this planning issue was different from others, as neither Ward Councillor had been allowed to represent the town. People thought they'd been abandoned by OTC and it could not change their views. Peter replied that he'd spent many hours on the phone to Nick Shipton, who'd spoken as a member of the public in April's OTC meeting, but that when it became clear they could no longer take part in the issue, he and Debbie had backed out. Going further, Peter slated that people had not been abandoned: This was a myth and not part of the complaints. In fact, someone had taken on representing residents' views a few days later. He noted that one complainant was an aggrieved developer who'd also wanted to bid for the land.  Debbie gave some background, some of which was in answering a post-meeting question from Mercury. She explained that Peter had been due lo speak In a Planning Meeting as a member of the public against the Planning Application. He'd declared a prejudicial interest and so was allowed to do this but would have had to leave before the debate had taken place. However, a day or two before the meeting, MKC received accusations about Debbie's conduct along with a strong view that neither she or Peter should have anything to do with the Application. As a result, they backed away from it apart from, when asked, helping lo arrange an alternative Ward Councillor to represent residents' views. She said that they'd never abandon people in the town, "we just wouldn't", and that the whole episode had been regrettable. She fell that OTC had been manipulated to an extent: One of its members, not present at this mooting, should not have been part of some conversations in this Chamber - not good news. Jeremy Rawlings concluded the discussion, saying that MKC had made an arbitrary decision not to advertise the land on the open market due to it not being possible to use standalone. He felt this had been glossed over. 

Code of conduct and declaration of Interests 
As regular readers will know, Councillors are obliged to declare ii they have an interest in any items being discussed. Peter Geary explained that not doing so will shortly become a criminal offence. This meant that Councillors must understand what constituted personal and prejudicial interests or else, in theory at least, they could end up appearing before a Court.

Local boundary review
Differences in the rate of population expansion across M1lton Keynes Borough mean that some Ward Councillors now represent many more people than others and, thus, MKC ls performing a Ward boundary review. First of all the Electoral Commission is asklng how m􀃘ny Councillors should sit on MKC. Once it knows this, the ratio of Ward Councillors lo people is known and the resulting Ward boundary positions will then be decided.  This raises the possibility of Olney, plus some surrounding villages, being split into two Wards and, thus, each Olney Town Councillor being elected to represent one or the other. Historically, OTC has not believed this to be a good situation, and discussion tonight confirmed this view. As a result, OTC's opinion was that the number of MKC Councillors should be increased to around 67 - 70, thus keeping the ratio of Ward Councillors to people about the same and, it hoped, avoiding Olney being split into two Wards.  Mercury thanks Debbie Brock and Peter Geary for providing background on this issue. 

East Street car parking 
OTC noted in this year's Town Meeting that it's looking to provide additional parking near the sports fields by changing some of the grass area between the westernmost Recreation Ground goalposts and East Street for use as a car park. Details of this proposal have been on display at Olney Town Council but, in summary, a reconfiguration of the existing nearby car park would provide an additional 25 spaces while the additional area would provide a further 36. The MKC Community Parking Fund may help fund this work.  liam Costello Introduced the Item noting that there'd been some opposition from local residents and suggesting that, since both parts of the scheme were feasible, OTC could apply for funding for the two, then make firm decisions later on which, if any, to implement. Noting that, in spite of the Council having sent consultation letters to nearby residents, some had first heard of the proposals from the Phone Box, Debbie felt that they were very much hypothetical - they may never happen. She also stated that the devices added to the existing East Street car park to reduce antisocial behaviour mustn't be removed by any changes. Councillors decided to submit formal applications to the Community Parking Fund, listing the reconfiguration of the existing car park as the priority.

Football Club fence 
Olney Football Club has informed the Council of plans to erect a perimeter fence around its main pitch on the Recreation Ground. Paul Tough, Chair of the Club, was present and, at various points, standing orders were lilted so he could answer questions.  Summarising, Paul explained that the fencing would be low, likely green in colour, and was required to meet new Football Association rules and thus allow the Club to continue to operate. It was not the intention to stop the public, or indeed the fair, from using the area. As such, the plans included two areas where the fencing would slide back to allow access, and that these would be closed just between Friday and Saturday evenings. An additional benefit would be the reduction of dog fouling on match days. Finally, given the earlier discussion on parking, he noted that, if the area between the westernmost goal and East Street did become a car park, it could be possible to have a temporary high net behind the goal, to be erected only on match days, thus avoiding a permanent, and likely less pleasing, high fence there.  Councillors voted in favour of the plans, with six voting for, two against and three abstalning.

Bobs 'n' bits 
liam said that the Jubilee Beacon lighting had been very successful, and thanked The Olney Group (TOG) and Neill Elliot for helping organise it. He also reported that a new head groundsman has started at the Council. Finally, all Ann Hopkins Smith Alms Houses are currently lull but the waiting list is empty, so any elderly Lady with strong Olney connections can apply for an Almshouse by writing to Tony Evans at Olney Park Farm, Yardley Road, Olney, Bucks.  Next Meeting - Monday 2nd July The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd July in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 


Olney Council report for July 2012

More Public than Members
There were more members of the public than councillors present at the start of this month's meeting, so Mercury was looking forward to an evening of lively debate. 

Public Participation
Jim Middleton Five members of the public spoke at this month's meeting. First to speak was Jim Middleton on the subject or the Olney bypass. Jim read from a statement he had submitted to the Milton Keynes Core Strategy examination hearing. Jim said as a resident of Olney he attended the MK South Midlands Panel but was not allowed to say anything at the examination. The point he had made in the written submission was that all the development of urban areas north, south, east and west of Olney was having a hugely detrimental effect on Olney with traffic getting ever worse. Jim said he was ignored, and the panel in fact allowed no transport schemes, other than those in the then government's short term plans. This was a pathetic response from so called professionals to a long term planning exercise, he said, and in his opinion there can be no stronger case for a bypass anywhere in the country than Olney. Jim's full submission can be downloaded from http://www.milton­ keynes.gov.uk/planning-policy/documents/REP-269971- 3_MiddletonMKlnqdoc1 OlneyBP.pdf  Karen Gilbert Next to speak was Karen Gilbert, owner of Beans Cate in the Market Place, on a subject that was obviously of concern to a number of members of the public present, namely the application by Real Estate Advisors Savills, on behalf of Calle Nero, to open a branch in the building previously occupied by Derby House Saddtery. Karen said hers is a small, independent business which would struggle to compete against a large, national chain. The rates in Olney were the highest of the lour locations where she had branches and while Caffe Nero could absorb high business rates, she could not.  Elaine Baxendale Elaine Baxendale also spoke against the application. She has been an Olney resident for nine years, she said, and one of the attractions of the town is Its small 'quirky' establishments. Local businesses would be certain to suffer, she feat. and questioned whether Olney needed another big concern. There was a need to consider the environment, she said. The planning application was discussed as an agenda item later in the meeting.  Brian Rice Next to speak was Bryan Rice on the continued problems of parking In Oakdown Crescent.  Richard Stone Richard Stone, Bar Manager of The Carlton House Club (formerly Olney Working Men's Club) spoke about the proposal to position a bench outside of the club. For Information, this has been the subject of discussions by the council for many years. Many elderly people have complained that there is no where to sit and rest whist making the long walk along the High Street and the council have been looking to find a suitable location for a bench. Richard said that one of the license conditions of the club was that members should leave the club in a quiet and orderly manner. Although the club has a smoking area within the grounds he was concerned that a bench at the front would encourage members who wished to smoke to sit on the bench and also take drinks with them, which would be against the terms of the license. As a previous licensee of The Bull he knew what problems a bench outside would attract, he said. Added to that he and his family lived above the club with bedrooms facing out on to the High Street and they would be bound to suffer disturbed nights, he said.  George Horncasltle George Horncastle, Secretary of the club spoke next and said whist he accepted that the bench was for the benefit of elderly members of the community it would be bound to attract other people and the club would be blamed for disorderly behaviour of customers leaving adjacent licensed premises.

Best Kept VIiiage 2012 
Although Olney is a town it is eligible for entry to this competition and this year won the Michaelis Cup for small towns. The competition awards are for Best Kept towns/villages, not beautiful villages, and care, cleanliness, maintenance and community effort were what the judges were looking for when they visited in June. There will be a brief presentation ceremony at the Olney Centre on 8th September. Mercury noted, somewhat ironically, that Savills Is one of the sponsors of the competition.

Planning application for Derby House 
For information, this building has been empty since the Derby House Saddlery vacated the premises a year ago. It is a building of significant local importance and history, having been the site ol J.W. and E. Sowman which was established as an ironmongers in 1888 and went on to become a large emporium, finally being sold to Burgess' In 1962. Burgess' left the town in 1984. Real Estate Advisors Savllls have lodged two planning applications with respect to the premises. The first is to convert the upper floor into four two bedroom residential apartments. The second is for a change of use from a shop (use Class A 1) to a cafe  (mixed A1/A3) for occvpation by a branch of Calle Nero. In the Planning Statement Savills referred back to similar change of use applications which had been granted in Olney over the last 12 years. They also listed a number of natJonal appeal decisions which had established the justification for change to mixed A 1 /A3, which some councillors found somewhat intimidating. MKC ward councillor Peter Geary reminded the members that objections could only be made on planning grounds rather than the impact it would have on local businesses. However, the council might decide that there are already enough similar businesses nearby and any more would change the character of the town, in which case an objection might be justified. Multi-national companies like Savills and Caffe Nero have huge financial resources to appeal against any rejections he said, pointing out Tesco had successfully taken over two shops in the town. Mayor Steve Clark felt that Caffe Nero could not be regarded as a quality outlet and would not increase footfall in the town. He said it was regrettable that Derby House had closed the branch, since he knew of customers who travelled over 100 miles to shop there. Jeremy Rawlings thought it most unlikely that anyone would travel 100 mile to visit Caffe Nero, although he pointed out that if the application was rejected the building could be empty for many years. Peter Geary suggested that the council should support the application for the flats since it would reduce the size of the shop and make it more marketable. He also reminded councillors that if Gaffe Nero were so minded they could buy up one of the existing coffee shops in the town and would not need to apply for a change of use. Colin Rodden was concerned that the plans did not allow for sufficient car parking for the cafe and flats. Debbie Brock said that it was important that the Integrity of the front and rear of the building Is maintained so the proposed UPVC windows were not appropriate. Alan Richardson noted that the plans Included retlling of the entrance but pointed out the existing tiling is of historical importance. 

Electoral Review of MIiton Keynes
Mercury is grateful to MKC ward councillor Peter Geary for providing the background to this issue. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England has undertaken discussions with MKC and consulted publicly on council size and has decided that the number of councillor should be increased to 57, from the current 51. Each councillor will cover 3,300 residents as opposed to 3,000 at present. What now has to be decided is the way the wards in Milton Keynes are constructed. The starting point is 19 wards, each represented by three councillors. In most of urban MK this is fine but in the rural areas this leaves very large geographical areas with many individual communities requiring individual attention from their councillors in attending parish council meetings etc. For example a merged Sherington and Olney ward would comprise around 18 parishes. With this in mind the two councillors. The boundary commission says that if a parish is split then it must be warded. Two years ago OTC campaigned against proposals by MKC to impose warding but these proposals mean that parish would be warded by stealth. Both the Sherington Ward and the Olney Ward currently have the correct representation for the new ratio of 3,300 electors per councillor so little change would be necessary and maintaining the status quo may well mean that better representation could be given to the areas. If, however, the areas are to be merged it would be better to have one three-councillor ward as opposed to single councillor wards which would see Olney Town Council warded. Peter said that in his opinion the two-councillor ward has worked successfully for many years, with the two councillors dividing up responsibility between them. Jeremy Rawlings questioned if this would work across the political spectrum, but Debbie Brock said that she and Steve Clark had managed ok. Steve Clark said that Olney Councillors have always expressed a desire to represent all of the people of the town.

102 Weston Road
The Town Council have received notification from the Housing Revenue Account Strategic Landlord Asset Management Group within MKC that the ground floor flat forming part of the property is to be removed from their housing stock and disposed of. It appears that when the previous occupant left it was no longer fit for habitation and has been empty for the last two years. MKC cannot justify the 'extensive financial investment to bring it up to a suitable standard for future beneficial occupation·. Peter Geary explained that the property has many issues and would cost an enormous amount to repair so the money would be better spent on building another, more easily maintainable property somewhere in Milton Keynes. One of the by• products of the disposal might be a partial solution to the parking problems in Oakdown Crescent since the property has a large front garden, some of which could be retained and used for parking. This would need consultation with the residents, he said.

Odds and Sods
A kebab van has applied to MKC for permission to operate from the old cattle market car park, owned by MKC. The councillors agreed not to support the application on the grounds of there being another establishment nearby catering for the need. Steve Clark said the applicant seemed to be under the impression that MKC had already granted permission and suggested that OTC apply to take over ownership of the car park as a Community Asset Transfer so that they could fully control it.  Steve Clark reported that he had attended the Olney 2012 event to mark the start or the London Olympics and it had been a great success.  Rosemary Osbourne reported that the boardwalk over the flood plane in Wagstaff Way should have started but had been delayed by the bad weather! It was now expected to be completed by 20th August.  Next Meeting - Monday 3rd September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd September in the Council Chamber In the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. Official minutes of all meetings and much more information can be accessed via OTC's revamped website at www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk 


Olney Council report for August.... 2011

Public participation 
No members of the public present (Mercury plus one!) wished to speak at this month's meeting. 

Co-option of members
A vacancy had arisen following the recent resignation of Nigel Birrell and there being no request for an election from the requisite number of the electorate, it fell to the council members present to fill the vacancy by co-option. The two candidates were invited to give a short address to the council to summarise their CVs.  First to speak was David Rumens, who was standing again following his failure to be co­opted to fill one of two vacancies at last month's meeting. David was first elected to OTC in 2008 and served for two years before having to resign due to ill health. Now that his health issues had been resolved David said he would welcome the opportunity of serving the town again as a member of the council. His experience in local government dates back to 1979 when he was elected to South Beds District Council and he has held many positions since. During his last stint on OTC he represented the council at many meetings with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) as he has a keen interest in resolving the enduring problem of high traffic volumes through Olney. He was also instrumental in the battle to keep Olney as a single ward, against the wishes of MKC who wanted to split it into three. He is currently a member of the Neighbourhood Action Group and is proud of his reputation as a 'campaigning councillor', he said.  The second candidate to speak was Tony Summerscales, a civil engineer in the water industry. Although he admitted he had no experience in local govennment he said that he had a young son and wanted him to grow up in a safe community and he was putting himself forward so that he could get involved in maintaining the town and its community for the enjoyment of the next generation.  A secret ballot then took place with Tony Summerscales receiving the most votes and he was duly elected. Steve Clark thanked David Rumens for his interest. David left the meeting at this point. 

Flood Risk Management 
Bruce Stewart, Senior Planning Officer - Strategic Flood Risk Management for Milton  Keynes Council was present to explain his role, which he has been in since March 2011, and the implications of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 which is gradually being implemented nationally. The current framework was largely established in the 1930s and 40s, he said and, although some updating had taken place, it did not comply with EU legislation and guidance. The new act meant that MKC as the Local Authority were obliged to take over certain flood responsibilities from the Environment Agency (EA) and Dept. for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). MKC has set up a parent Cabinet-led management group and three officer lead working subgroups comprising Strategic Flood Planning, Flood Prevention and Flooding Emergency Response. The principle shortcomings identified thus far are a lack of in-house water, drainage and flood expertise and a shortage of available funding to address problems in those areas. It isMKC's intention to form closer relationships with Parish and Town Councils who may be able to assist in providing information on local water and flood risk management issues, said Bruce. Mayor Steve Clark said that councils were frustrated that developers were allowed to put in planning applications for floodplains and Bruce replied that any applications with flood implications would now be submitted to him.

Localism Bill 
The Localism was introduced to Parliament in December 2010 and seeks to shift much of the decision making of central government to local authorities. Part of the bill deals with the right of communities to submit an 'expression of interest' to the local authority to provide or assist in providing a relevant service on behalf of that authority and that could lead to a transfer of assets from the authority. Steve Clark said that OTC already manages many of its own assets but the bill would widen the scope when it became law. MKC might come under pressure to dispose of some of its local assets such as car parks, the Olney Centre and Emberton Park, he said. In the event of the latter it was unlikely that Emberton Parish Council would be able to afford to manage the park but OTC could consider a joint venture, he suggested. MKC will be running a series of workshops during August and OTC will send representatives with a view to forming a sub-committee. This will doubtless be the subject of discussion at future meeting since in Steve's view it is a massive subject at which OTC should "nibble gently". 

Recreation ground sewage pipe (continued)
As reported last month the sewage pipe connecting the four sports club houses to the main in East Street has collapsed, which is why there is regularly an overflow when functions take place at the clubs, necessitating rodding by the council staff. Alan Richardson said that since the last council meeting he had had two meetings with Anglian Water and they had confirmed that from October 1 st 2011 the section of pipe which had collapsed would become the responsibility of Anglian Water under the new proposal to adopt private sewers and lateral drains. Although any work that Anglian Water deemed necessary would be done free of charge the replacement would not happen immediately, he said. The first time a blockage was reported Anglian Water would attend and rod the drain to unblock it. If it then became a regular occurrence then the gang would report it with a recommendation to consider replacement work. Eventually it would get replaced, he said. Deidre Bethune asked if the council would now reconsider the refurbishment of the Market Place toilets now that this particular problem would be resolved at nil cost to the council. 

Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) 
Deidre Bethune reported that this hugely popular event would take place for the third year running on Saturday September 12th. Last year's event had made a slight loss, she said, and since then the membership of the Chamber of Trade had reduced. In view of these facts she asked if the council would consider underwriting the event in case of financial loss, as they do for the Firework Night run by TOG (The Olney Group). A figure of £1200 was suggested. Ron Bull said that the Fireworks organisers had only found ii necessary to call on the underwriting once in the 20 year history and he was concerned that BOFF might regularly make a loss. Deidre said that BOFF does not have the funds to absorb the loss themselves. Tony Evans said that he had been a member of the BOFF organising committee for its first two years but felt that there was a big difference between BOFF and the Firework Night, which was organised for the Town. BOFF is a commercial event and stall holders make a profit. Although he agreed that it is a fantastic event he said he felt uncomfortable with the request for underwriting. Should the organisers not be looking to the stallholders themselves to make up any loss, he wondered. Mike Hughes said he felt OTC's role should be to encourage trade and visitors to the town and BOFF should be encouraged so he would not want to be part of any refusal. Eventually the requested for underwriting was agreed by a majority vote. 

Stoke Goldington wind turbines application
As reported last month, an application has been received to build 15 wind turbines at Stoke Lodge Farm, Stoke Goldington. Deidre Bethune said in her opinion MKC was in no position to consider this application at present because it does not have a current or adequate policy. Last month Jeremy Rawlings reported that the existing policy had not been updated for some time and MKC had been asked to update it to bring in line with national guidelines. In particular, there was no reference to consideration being given to the proximity of existing installations. There then followed a general discussion about the merits of wind power, in general. Colin Rodden said that he believed sustainable energy is required but wondered if data was available to support it. Deidre said the operating companies refused to publish data about the output of such installations, claiming that it was 'commercially sensitive', so it was impossible to know if they were efficient or not. Jeremy Rawlings said that when there is too much power in the grid it is easier to switch off wind turbines than coal fired power stations so the operators are paid to keep them stationary. Tony Evans said that the incentives to farmers to allow wind farms to be sited on their land were enormous so OTC needed to act quickly if they wanted to stop every farmer around having them. Alan Richardson said that if past experience was anything to go by, once an application was submitted there was nothing that OTC or anyone else could do to stop it. Steve Clark disagreed, saying that the Wind Farm at Petsoe End had been the first application submitted to MKC and that had only been passed by a narrow margin, so it was not a foregone conclusion. Although no formal vote was taken, an informal vote showed that the members were overwhelmingly against the proposal. Full details of the planning application, ref 11/01193/FULEIS can be found at http://publicaccess.milton-keynes.gov.uk/ 

Odds and sods 
The newly acquired field next to the Charity Field has been sprayed and ploughed and needs to be seeded as soon as possible after the end of August. A number of quotes for seeding have been received and the council agreed to a local quote of £1800. At the moment it is just known as 'the new field', so if anyone has a suggestion for a better name please contact the Town Clerk, or send your suggestion to The Phonebox.  Mike Hughes said that a resident had reported human excrement at the top of the children's slide on Johnson's Field the previous Friday. He had personally attended with cleaning equipment and removed it, but the incident had been repeated the next day. Rosemary Osbourne asked Debbie Brock what was happening about the provision of double yellow lines at the entrance to Chantry Rise, as turning right on to Weston Road was extremely dangerous. Debbie replied that the consultation had recently taken place as part of the process, which was ongoing.  Jeremy Rawlings reported that after 24 years of loyal service Cheryl Wilson's position at the Youth Club had been 'outsourced' by MKC. The promised administrator was yet to appear though.  Steve Clark reported that as of that day Ousedale School had become an academy. Mercury assumes that The Phonebox's invitation to the celebrations got lost in the post.  Tony Evan said that the grass banks on Driftway were a mess and asked that they be strimmed. In fact, all local landscaped areas that are the responsibility of MKC are in a similar state, he said.  Steve Clark said that the inaugural concert by the Olney Community Choir at the Parish Church had been incredibly well attended. Also, the inaugural concert of Olney Brass at the Carlton House Club had been a great success, with a specially commissioned piece of music 'The One and Olney' being played for the first time. In recognition of their support OTC had been presented with a framed copy of the music, which would be hung in the Olney Centre.  Next Meeting - Monday 5th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 


Olney Council report for September 2012

Public Participation
Simon Barker First up was Simon Barker of Olney Baptist Church, speaking on behalf of all the Churches of Olney. He thanked Olney Town Council (OTC) for its support for the recent Olympics event In the town - the Council had agreed to underwrite the £2,700 cost of the marquee and toilets. He stated that the event had been by the people and for the people of the town, and also thanked the Sports Clubs, The Olney Group, Best Seat In The House, Mike Hughes and others for their contributions towards the day. The event had enjoyed good weather and was well attended, with perhaps 2·3,000 attending through the day. Although its accounts are still provisional, the organisers expect to be able to pay around £1,200 back to OTC, meaning the Council will effectively pay only around £1,500 of the underwriting costs. Leonard Lean Next to speak was Leonard Lean, complete with his own stopwatch to lime the three minutes for which participants in this slot are allowed to speak. As interim coordinator of the Bedford-Olney-Northampton Rail Link Forum, he spoke about its alm to get the track bed of this long closed route restored to full commercial use for both passengers and freight The Forum has been performing a survey of the track bed and believes restoration would be possible. The passenger service would essentially contribute towards a link between Birmingham, Coventry, Luton and Gatwick airports and he envisaged two trains per hour for daytime services.  Sue Warren Last up was Sue Warren, on the familiar topic or parking in Oakdown Crescent. A few weeks before, she'd been advised by Richard Duffill, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Traffic and Parking Team Leader, that he'd appointed a person to carry out a feasibility study on two sites which had the potential to help with the parking issue: 102 Weston Road and the unused garages at the bottom of the Crescent. She felt this represented progress, a feeling reinforced by her receiving an email saying that a parking scheme had been agreed, but then couldn't understand why an auction sign had been erected on the Weston Road site. She concluded by thanking Deirdre Bethune for her previous comments on the Issue,  As background, note that last month's Mercury reported that 102 Weston Road was due to be sold, and that one of the by-products of the sale might be a partial solution to the parking problems in Oakdown Crescent since the property has a large front garden, some of which could be retained and used for parking.  Debbie Brock Debbie Brock responded briefly to Sue, noting that there was a draft plan containing several options but that it had not yet been approved. She explained that all aspects of any scheme had to be considered - Oakdown Crescent did not exist in isolation - and that, while matters were progressing, a scheme had not yet been confirmed. She also noted that, should Jack's land be sold, the Council would retain part of its garden. 

High Street Bench
Following on from a topic aired in last month's Public Participation, the Recreations and Services Committee has recommended that a two-seat bench be placed on the pavement outside the United Reform Church, mainly for the benefit ol the elderly. Councillors discussed this, and decided by a majority that the bench would be installed on a trial basis, with reviews after six and 12 months, to which Its two main opponents - the United Reform Church and the Carlton House Club - would be invited to contribute their views.

East Street Car Park 
As reported before, OTC has applied for funding to improve the East Street car park. The applications for both phases of this 50% match funding - £32,500 and £25,000 - have been successful.  There was some discussion over whether the dimensions of the proposed additional parking area were adequate, and a small group of Councillors look an action to confirm this. OTC will arrange and advertise a public meeting, likely in October, to explain the proposals.

Rights of Way
Back In 2004, OTC submitted an application to MKC to add a lootpath around the Northern and Eastern edges of Doff's Field, plus one from around the centre of its Northern edge running ,diagonally to Its South Eastern corner. Much later, OTC advised MKC that it wished to remove the diagonal path from the application.  The whole matter seems to have progressed slowly, with OTC having just rnceived an email indicating that MKC would shortly be considering the application, and asking OTC to confirm whether it did Indeed wish to remove the diagonal path. After a brief discussion, Councillors agreed that this path should be removed, leaving just that round the two edges.

Bits 'n' bobs 
As discussed in June's meeting, funds arising from the Petsoe End Wind Farm would soon become available. Olney now has £7,000 which will be used to install low energy lighting in the Olney Centre and the Market Place toilets.  Tony Evans reported that, having had to postpone their residents' Jubilee Lunch in June, the Ann Hopkins Smith trustees held the lunch late in August and it was a great success.  Jeremy Rawlings reported that the new Youth Leader is Terry Isles, filling the post vacated by Darren Smith.  Ron Bull raised the issue that parking in Spring Lane was sometimes preventing buses from travelling along it as, in one section, particular.

Public Participation
Sue Warren First to speak was Sue Warren, on the regular topic of parking in Oakdown Crescent. Sue said she was pleased that Richard Duffill was present but disappointed that over a year had passed since she flrst made the council aware of the situation and it was still not resolved. She said the wheels of local government obviously turned very slowly but this was of no consolation to the elderly residents who wanted a nice place in which to live, not a car park. She also thanked Deidre Bethune for her efforts in seeking a resolution.  Kim Cupper Olney resident Kim Cupper said that he rented two of the garages at the bottom of the crescent and frequently had problems gaining access to them, the problem having worsened in the last few weeks. He pointed out that he pays over £100 per month for the privilege of parking, whereas everyone else parks for free.  Phil Gilbert Next to speak was Phil Gilbert of Beans Cale, responding to recent complaints about tables and chairs encroaching on the footway and blocking mobility scooters. The chairs are 0.6m wide and the pavement is 2.5m wide at that point so there should be plenty of room to pass, he said. However, he recognised that customers sometimes moved the furniture and apologised for the Inconvenience this causes. He also spoke on the issue of the application by Real Estate Advisors Savills, on behalf or Caffe Nero, to open a branch in the building previously occupied by Derby House Saddlery. He said he runs six businesses around the country and loved Olney because it is full of smaller, bespoke shops. He felt that people travel from elsewhere in Milton Keynes because Olney is so different. He contrasted Olney with Stamford which is a town of similar size that has allowed the 'mulltiples' to move in.  Mayor Steve Clark responded saying that the application for conversion or the top floor into flats had been passed and Peter Geary noted that the request for the change of use for the ground floor was still on-going but he remained hopeful of a satisfactory outcome. 

Update from Richard Dufflll on highways Issues
Richard started by apologising to Sue Warren for appearing to be so elusive but explained that his was a small but highly stretched team. He said he had been made aware of the Oakdown Crescent situation a year ago and ward councillors Debbie Brock and Peter Geary had been constantly on his back for a resolution! He had also consulted colleagues in the Housing Department, as the problem stemmed from a lack or parking spaces on Weston Road. He was looking at how the land retained from the sale by MKC of 102 Weston Road might be used, as well as a number of other possibihlles. One option would be to make a few additional spaces available in Oakdown Crescent, itself, and he is considering three different schemes to generate up to eight additional spaces although there is a BT pole which would need moving. Most of the land is not adopted and the garages are In private ownership, he explained.  However, none would work without some form of restrictions, i.e. residents' parking permits. since most of the cars currently parked there belong to residents of Weston Road. With regard to the possibility of using the retained land from 102 Weston Road, he said there were issues with the level or the land but none of them are insurmountable. He thought that marked bays could provide parking for eight vehicles but if unmarked could possibly result In a couple more, due to the often discussed 'imaginative parking' techniques adopted elsewhere in the town.  The next steps would be lor all of the schemes to start the consultation process, the result of which could see the approved option being completed this rlnancial year. The use of 102 Weston Road might take a little longer, though, depending on opposition from nearby residents. Jeremy Rawlings didn't think just creating a car park would solve the problem which prompted Richard to ask what problem he was being asked to address, as his understanding was that issue is around access for emergency vehicles and parking for residents. John Sharpe asked ii the proceeds from the sale of 102 Weston Road could be used to fund the scheme but Peter Geary said this was not possible as it had to be used for housing.  Debbie Brock asked Richard for an update on the remodelling of the junction of Weston Road with High Street South (Halleluiah lamppost). Richard said that the original proposals were being revised to include improvements to the Co-op entrance and to make rt more pedestrian friendly. The revised plans will go to full consultatlon before the end of the year with work starling in the next financial year. Likewise, the original Yardley Road plans are being reVlsed to include well laid out parking spaces and Richard said he would return with the plans within the next two months, prior to consultation. 

Crossing point at Bridge Street/High Street South 
An email had been received rrom a member of the public pointing out the difficulties of crossing the street with a buggy to get to Emberton Park. Crossing Weston Road by the Co-op means having to negotiate traffic coming from three directions, she said, and the Island near Church Street is not large enough for pedestrians plus buggy so is not sale. An elderly relative had been killed on this stretch of road, she said, and did not want ii to happening again. Richard Dufflll said that the revised scheme would look to address this issue. 

East Street parking proposals 
Richard Duffill stayed on for this item, saying that anything that lakes place on East Street has an impact on his department. As reported before, OTC has applied for funding to improve the East Street car park. The applications for both phases of this 50% match funding-1:32,500 and 1:25,000 -have been succ,essful. One scheme is to reconfigure the layout of the existing car park at the front of the Rugby Club to create add11lonal spaces. There are currently 121 marked spaces which would increase 132 or 129 plus 2 disabled spaces, depending on the scheme adopted. Ron Bull quest10ned the need for any changes saying that an additional 46 cars had managed to park for a recent sporting event {presumably using the lore mentioned 'imaginative parking' techniques!). Tony Evans said that was precisely why changes were needed, since that had resulted in a number of correctly parked cars being blocked in.  The second and more controversial plan is to provide 36 spaces on a new parking area on East Street behind the goal posts of the lootball pitch. There then followed a discussion on whether this was the best location for the new area. It was suggested that perhaps the current grassed area to the north of the Football Club might be better. {Mercury was seen to reooil In horror at this suggesllon, since this is the site for 'Booze on the Ouse', highlight of Olney's social and musical calendar).  Fortunately, Tony Evans said that this would not be appropriate since this area ,s used for training and would also present problems for access. Mercury wondered if the perfectly flat grassed area behind the nearby hedge might prove a better location but since at least one member or the Bowls Club was present, decided to keep his own counsel.  Tony Evans was keen to emphasise that both schemes were not just for the benefit of the sports clubs but would alleviate some of the parking problems in the town. Jeremy Rawlings disagreed, saying that the sports clubs would be the main benefactors. The proor of this is that the East Street car park is empty for most of the week. Tony replied saying that the council need to educate the public that the car park Is there and available. People do not like to park 'round the back' and walk to the shops but at least having the additional spaces directly on East Street would make them more visible. 

Odds 'n' sods
Rosemary Osbourne reported back from the NAG (Neighbourhood Action Group) on the Dog Control Order proposals which had prompted some correspondence to The Phonebox, emphasising that the intention was not to stop people walking dogs but to do It more responsibly. MKC have suggested that OTC might like to take over the running of the Youth Club as part of the Community Asset Transfer Scheme.  John Sharpe noted that a number of pathways are becoming overgrown by hedges, particularly by Emberton Park. Peter Geary replied that most of the overgrowing hedges are not owned by MKC and cutting them could set an expectation that MKC would continue to do so, although he admitted that the one by the park is under their ownership.  Deidre Bethune said that comments had been made to her about the purple colour scheme adopted by the shop that has replaced 'Aubergine'.  Mercury - what do you think? Just because the High Street is a conservation area should MKC planners be able to dictate the colours that owners can paint their properties, or does a splash of colour make it more interesting?  Your thoughts are welcome through The Phonebox. 


Olney Council report for November 2012

Public Participation
Mark Luckin First to speak was Mark Luckin of The Olney Group (TOG). He explained that Fireworks Night was due to be held on Sunday 4th November but, due to heavy rain and the resulting very poor ground conditions, TOG had decided to postpone it until Saturday 10th November - felt to be the best date available while avoiding Remembrance Day. Mark ended with a call for more helpers on the night, as the postponement meant it was proving hard to get marshals and gate people at such short notice. Elaine Herniman  Second up was Elaine Herniman from the Olney Allotment Holders Association. She was disappointed that the Council's Recreations and Services Committee had recommended, without consultation, that on­site bonfires be banned. She explained that Royal Horticultural Society guidelines recommended that burning was the best way to dispose of plants affected by blight, club root, etc. Elaine concluded by saying that this had the potential to undermine the relationship between the allotment holders and the Council.  Steve Clark Steve Clark spoke briefly at this point to say that, while the issue had indeed been discussed by the Recreations and Services Committee, its decision was to consult first with allotment holders. It hadn't done so yet and so had not recommended anything to full Council. 

East Street parking proposals 
Tony Evans reported that, as a result of the recent Public Meeting, the Recreations and Services Committee was recommending to full Council that the planned alterations to the existing East Street Car Park should go ahead. Although the total was not yet costed, 50% of it would be paid for by Milton Keynes Council (MKC).  However, Tony explained that the Public Meeting found the additional car park area at the top of the Nursery Field adjacent to East Street to be much more controversial, with around half the those attending being in favour and half against. In any case, it would likely need planning permission, so the Committee recommended that Olney Town Council (OTC) seek pre-planning advice from MKC, at a cost of around £200.  Councillors all voted in favour the alterations to the existing East Street Car Park bar one against - Ron Bull, who noted that the resulting number of spaces, while greater than that currently marked, was less than that currently achieved in practice. Councillors also voted in favour of seeking pre-planning advice about the additional parking area.

Allotment bonfires 
Tony Evans introduced this topic, saying that the Recreations and Services Committee would consult with the allotment holders, as was said in its last meeting. There followed a somewhat arcane discussion on how this information had been passed to the allotment holders. The main point is that they will be consulted.

Hedge laylng
OTC had received a quote for £2,300 to hedge the boundary between the Allotments Field and the newly purchased Crouch's Field. Tony Evans noted that the right time of year to do the job would be between now and the end of February. 

Rights of way 
As reported in an earlier Mercury, back in January 2004 OTC submitted an application to MKC to add a footpath around the Northern and Eastern edges of Doff's Field, plus one from around the centre of its Northern edge running diagonally to its South Eastern corner. Later, OTC advised MKC that it wished to remove the diagonal path from the application.  Continuing apace, it has now been resolved that there is no evidence that the diagonal path across Doff's Field should become a public right of way. The decision on the status of the path around the Northern and Eastern edges of Doffs Field and continuing South along the riverbank to the bridge to Clifton Reynes has been deferred until January 2013, to allow any further evidence to be collected.

Youth Centre 
Steve Clark explained that MKC owns the Olney Youth Centre building, and provides a yearly grant towards its running costs. Councillors discussed whether OTC should express an interest in obtaining the building and, it was assumed, the land behind it under the Community Asset Transfer scheme. Peter Geary stated that this could move quite quickly, perhaps being concluded in around six months. A small group of Councillors will be set up to progress this issue. 

Traffic Issues 
Debbie Brock introduced this item. She'd corresponded with a local resident about traffic issues in the West Street area and noted that, if the Council was minded, it could redirect MKC officers to consider the traffic issues there. At the same time, she acknowledged that it was far from being the only awkward traffic area in the town. This started a wide ranging discussion and, summarising, there were two outcomes. First, the Council would re-assess the Yardley road junction plans, due from MKC shortly. Second, it would consider producing a Neighbourhood Plan, as this would give local people more say over the town's development. 

Berrells Court 
The extremely poor condition of Berrells Court, off East Street, is causing concern. Councillors passed around pictures of the road and it was clear that things were far from satisfactory, with huge areas of standing water covering much of the surface.  Dedire Bethune felt passionately that it was dangerous and a "disgusting tip". She felt the situation had to be sorted out, in spite of difficulties about who owned the land. Other Councillors backed up Deidre in her view. She noted that uncertainty over who owned the land was a problem, and that there was some dependency on a Planning Permission granted nine months ago, and which remained valid for another two years and three months.  Peter Geary noted that a condition of this Permission was that the road surface should be brought up to standard, with tarmac and drainage, before construction could start. Liam Costello believed that this condition was effectively stopping the development -presumably due to the expense of improving the road. John Boardman concluded the discussion by suggesting that OTC initiate a meeting of all the interested parties. Councillors agreed with this. 

Market Place toilets 
Liam Costello Liam Costello reported that work on the toilets was progressing well, and that delivery of the stainless steel furniture was awaited. Tony said it appeared that the hot and cold water sink for the Market traders had been removed from the store room and, as the specification didn't say it should be removed, it needed to be returned. 

Traka 
Steve Clark had been invited to Traka, www.traka.com, a local business, in celebration of it being awarded its third Queen's Award for Enterprise. He'd most enjoyed the day, feeling the tour was "stunning". As background, he explained that the company had been founded in 1995 with four people, and had now grown to around 100. 

Odds and sods

Next Meeting - Monday 3rd December The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd December In the Council Chamber In the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 


Olney Council report for December 2012

Public Participation
Peter Gage First to speak was Peter Gage on the subject of dog fouling. Peter said he attended a recent Neighbourhood Action Group (NAG) meeting in order to dispel some of the myths around the issue. The NAG was claiming that a recent survey had shown this to be the biggest concern in the minds of the people of Olney, but this was ʻnonsenseʼ, he said. The survey had only interviewed 80 people, which is around 1.6% of the population. An inspection of the recreation ground by enforcement officers from Milton Keynes Council (MKC) had concluded that it was as clean as anywhere in Milton Keynes. Peter said that he regularly refereed football matches for Olney Town Colts and had personally only experienced one occurrence of dog fouling on the pitch, but he did concede that it was more of a problem on the main pitch in front of the Football Club. He did not think that a Dog Control Order (DCO) forcing owners to keep their dogs on a lead would make any difference. This subject was a later item on the meeting agenda. Carol Barrett Next to speak was Berrells Court resident Carol Barrett on the subject of the poor state of the road surface in that area, following the discussion at last monthʼs meeting. She said she had raised the issue a year ago but nothing had happened, apart from the fact that it had actually got worse and one resident had had a fall due to the problem. She reminded the council that planning permission for building had been granted, subject to renovation of the surface, but that could be a long time coming, she felt.

Berrells Court
Although this did not appear to be a formal agenda item this month, it was discussed at last monthʼs meeting so the discussion continued under Matters Arising. Deidre Bethune said the situation was a ʻcrying shameʼ and she fully supported Carol Barrettʼs efforts. John Sharp said that the Land Registry show that Berrells Court has not been adopted as part of the public highway. He had spoken to a number of property owners, some of whom had indicated a willingness to pay for the repairs but, equally, there were those who would not. No formal estimate appears to exist to indicate how much the remedial work would cost but MKC Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that in his opinion one should be obtained in order to ʻmop upʼ any unclaimed grants from MKC. If a simple covering of tarmac was laid it would probably need doing again in two to three years, he said, and thought the best option would be to lay proper drainage and seek adoption by MKC. Deidre Bethune pointed out that the required standards for adoption are very high but agreed that it should be the preferred option. Carol Barrett spoke again, saying that adoption and repair would mainly benefit the developer who would be building and then selling the proposed new property and she, personally, would be happy for remedial work short of adoption.

Dog fouling on recreation ground
Following the recent inspection and report by MKC about the issue, Tony Evans said it was news to him that there is NOT a problem! He thought that getting the MKC enforcement officers involved would identify persistent offenders, with possible prosecutions. Jeremy Rawlings wondered that if the ʻprofessionalsʼ said there was no problem and Peter Gage was of the same opinion then perhaps it was not an issue. Deidre Bethune disagreed, saying that even if responsible dog owners picked up their dogsʼ mess it often got ʻsmeared aroundʼ leaving some behind. Jeremy wondered if dog faeces is actually more dangerous than that of the wild animals that would naturally use the field. Mayor Steve Clark said that the problem is Toxocara Canis and Toxocara Cati that is present in dog and cat faeces, respectively. John Sharp suggested that the solution might be to ban dogs altogether from marked out pitches and fines could be imposed for offenders. Peter Geary observed that the enforcement officers cannot be there all of the time and it was no surprise that owners cleared up while they were there observing. He suggested that there could be three distinct areas:

  • Dogs not allowed
  • Where dogs are allowed on a lead
  • Where dogs are allowed to run free
Peter Gage interjected, saying that a DCO was not appropriate, considering that most pitches were only used for two to three hours a week during three or four months of the year. Tony Evans pointed out that the recreation ground is used for other events, such as the highly successful Olympic Opening celebration, when two to three thousand people had sat down on the grass. He described dog fouling as an ʻevil thingʼ. Peter Geary said there would be no point in imposing a DCO if it was not enforced. Deidre Bethune said that unless something is illegal the police would not be interested in enforcing it and Jeremy Rawlings was of the opinion that dog fouling is not actually illegal unless it is on the public highway. John Sharp suggested using the Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) but Peter Geary said that would only be possible if Thames Valley Police agree and the Chief Constableʼs view would no doubt be that PCSOs should concentrate on crime prevention. He recommended that the council press ahead with seeking a DCO otherwise the issue would continue to go ʻround and roundʼ with no resolution. Steve Clark closed the subject by saying that Rob Ward from MKC Environmental Services would be invited to the next meeting of the Recs and Services Committee.
Market Place parking
This issue is frequently discussed at meetings of OTC. The council have always resisted the idea of formally marked out parking spaces because it would reduce the theoretical number of spaces that are available due to ʻimaginativeʼ parking. However, this relies on the first cars that park each day doing so in a manner that allows two rows down the middle. If this does not happen then the number of spaces is considerably reduced for the rest of that day. John Sharp said that the council had previously suggested the marking of a single white line down the centre of the car park to show where cars should park nose to tail. Ron Bull suggested that this should be done on a temporary basis to see if it is adhered to. It was agreed that a small group of councillors will investigate this option.

Farmersʼ Market hot food
As reported previously, the council have agreed to overturn the ban on hot takeaway food being sold at the market and as a result have had a request from a start-up Olney company wishing to sell Paella. Tony Evans suggested that before giving them the go-ahead on a permanent basis they should be invited to have a ʻguest spotʼ so that they can be audited to ensure that they use locally sourced ingredients, where possible. Mercury understands that they use poultry from a local farm, so presumably this wonʼt be an issue.

Model T Ford Rally
A letter had been received from the organisers of this event on Friday June 7th 2013, requesting reserved parking spaces for about 45 cars. Councillors agreed that the obvious place for this would be the Market Place but recognised that closing the Market Place for any length of time could impact trade. The upside could be that it might attract visitors and the exhibitors would possibly eat in the town. John Boardman said that it would only attract visitors if the event was sufficiently well advertised and hoped that the organisers would do so. It was suggested that the market would be closed until 3.00pm and Deidre Bethune would consult the Chamber of Trade.
 
Booze on the Ouse
A letter had been received from Olney Town Colts informing the council that this popular event would be taking place on Saturday June 29th 2013. This was noted and agreed, but also pointed out that this should have come in as a request because it is held on OTC land. Tony Evans said that he really did not like the title of the event as it sends out completely the wrong message.

Odds and sods
Steve Clark reported that the refurbished toilets on the Market Place were now open, but did not say if he had performed an official opening ceremony. Andrew Dooley has resigned from the council due to work commitments, so a vacancy now exists. The period during which residents can demand a by-election was due to expire at midnight on the day of the meeting so it is assumed that the vacancy will be filled by co-option. Any resident wishing to stand should get in touch with the Town Clerk at the Olney Centre. Rosemary Osbourne asked when the issue of extending the yellow lines at the entrance to Chantry Rise would be resolved and Peter Geary said that the process of consultation is on-going, but he had received a letter asking that the existing lines are NOT extended.  John Sharp noted that the overhanging hedges by Emberton Park had still not been cut back by MKC and Peter Geary replied that it was on the list of work to be done but the recent bad weather had caused a back-log.
Next Meeting - Monday 7th January The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th January in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
------
 
Mercury's reports for 2013 and before


Mercury report for the Council Meeting of Monday 7th January 2013

Public Participation
Rena Partridge First to speak was Rena Partridge, noting that the street lighting at the north end of West Street is very poor and a danger for pedestrians, and asking if there’d been any progress on improving access arrangements to the Co-op car park. She felt the current access from Weston Road was dangerous, particularly for pedestrians exiting the car park. Steve Clark explained it was a pity that neither Ward Councillor was present, as they’d have the most up to date information for Rena. He commented only on her second point, saying that changes were under consideration but he didn’t know when they’d be made. Bryan Rice Second to speak was Bryan Rice, clearly not happy about the subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent and Weston Road. Noting that the latest round of complaints had been ongoing for around a year, he felt that nothing had been done and that the remit given to the Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Transport representative was ‘inept’. He noted a couple of ways he felt the situation could be resolved, that Councillors should ‘pull their socks up’ and that, if the situation didn’t get resolved, he’d be back the next month, and the next... until it did.  Steve Clark explained that neither Highways nor Parking issues were in the power of Olney Town Council (OTC) to solve – they were MKC issues. Ron Bull concluded this item, noting pointedly that there was a vacancy for a new Councillor, should one wish to put themselves forward.

Recreation Ground dog fouling
Rosemary Osborne had met Rob Ward, Neighbourhood Manager at MKC, to discuss various issues related to dog fouling. Namely, to consider whether the Recreation Ground should have a designated area for dog walkers, whether the improved signage has helped, and to discuss the proposed fencing around the football pitch adjacent to East Street. The decisions made in this meeting were to install dog bag dispensers at the main entrances to the Ground, to monitor the impact of the improved signage, to request that the Sports Clubs talk with dog walkers using their pitches and, if appropriate, hand out dog bags to them, and that an article would be produced for the Phonebox to educate people about the effects of dog fouling. Liam Costello noted that the proposed fencing around the main football pitch would make it easier for a dog control order to be applied to that area, but that for private land, such as that on which various rugby pitches are based, a joint scheme would be required. Ben Brock, one of the Rugby Club coaches, noted that the Club may well be in favour of such an approach. Peter Gage, who’d spoken on this topic in the Public Participation section of last month’s meeting and had come to listen to this one, felt that providing information and education to the Ground’s users was an excellent approach.

East Street Car Park
As noted in an earlier Mercury, OTC has sought advice from MKC related to the East Street Car Park extension, prior to it submitting a formal Planning Application. That advice highlighted two areas of concern. First, there are three large trees located to the edge of the proposed additional car parking area. These trees must be retained, implying that protection must be afforded to their roots, meaning that the space immediately around them can’t be used. Second, there must be a six metre over-run area between the football pitch and the additional parking area. This latter area of concern surprised Councillors, in that the Football Club’s Planning Application specifies that the fencing will be only two metres from the Pitch. After some discussions, Councillors decided to wait on the outcome of this Application, due to be considered mid January, then to consider having proper Architect’s plans drawn up for the site, including allowances for the tree roots.

Berrells Court
As reported previously, the Council is trying to facilitate surface improvements to Berrells Court. It’s contacted the landlords of properties on the Court and now has a list of those who’d be interested in collaborating to pay for the improvements. Councillors planned to discuss pricing for these improvements in the confidential items agenda item handled after the public, including Mercury, have left the meeting.

Summer planting
Tony Evans explained that the Council has received the quotation and plans for the summer bedding plants around Olney. Martin, the new Groundsman, is keen to add more of a ‘wow factor’ to the displays by using a wider range of informal plants and, as such, The Knoll and the bed outside the Cemetery Rest Room will trial these ideas. These have resulted in the quotation of £3077 being £480 more than last year. Councillors felt the would bring, and voted unanimously to accept it.

Armed Forces Day
Alan Richardson introduced this item noting that, each June, the Council hosts a buffet meal for war veterans in the Olney Centre. This is much appreciated, but the attendees would like to eat sitting together in one room, and the Olney Centre can’t accommodate this. Alan had talked informally with the Carlton House Club, and it appeared they could host the event in their function room, also providing the food. Councillors liked this, giving their unanimous approval for Alan to pursue this course of action.
Pinders Circus
After a successful visit to the Pyghtle last year, Pinders Circus has asked to visit again, the dates being Thursday 9th to Sunday 12th May. Councillors agreed unanimously to this request, with all bar one voting to keep the daily rate charged to the Circus unchanged this year. Surf to www.pinderscircus.co.uk for more information.

Model T Ford Rally
Councillors voted to allow the Market Square Car Park to be used as part of a Model T Ford Rally on Friday 7th June. All voted in favour bar three against. The benefits cited were that it’d be interesting for people to see, and should bring more people to the town. The drawbacks were the consequent lack of parking in the centre.

Market Place Toilet refurbishment
The toilet refurbishment having been completed, Councillors reviewed the cost breakdown. The main issue was a significant overspend of around £6,000, around a third of the expected total. This was discussed at some length and just the main points are covered here. Tony Evans asked if all the additional amounts had been sanctioned by Mike Hughes, the Clerk of Works appointed by the Council. Liam Costello replied that they had. Jeremy Rawlings felt that some of the overspend, such as that on unforeseen underground sewage work, was reasonable. Overall, there was concern about the issue and, when Rosemary Osborne suggested inviting Mike to a meeting so that Councillors could put their questions to him and he could answer them, it was agreed quickly.

Specialist Nurse for the Elderly
Steve Clark noted that, with OTC having funded a specialist nurse for the elderly for the previous year, Olney finance firm The MPA Group – surf to www.thempagroup. co.uk – have set a great example to other local businesses by taking on the funding of that post.

TOG, PCSOs and torches
Steve reported that during last year’s Fireworks Display, The Olney Group (TOG) was glad to have help from the local Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs). TOG realised that the PCSOs’ torches were considerably less powerful than those used by the event marshals, and asked whether it could purchase brighter ones to replace them. The response was positive, six bright new LED torches were bought, and they’re now in the hands of the PCSOs.

Kitchener Centre
The Kitchener Centre offers day care to older people from Olney and the surrounding villages. Steve Clark outlined a proposal which local GP and ex-Councillor Brian Partridge had discussed with him. Brian was instrumental in the original Kitchener Centre project and, with over a quarter of local people now being over 60, the need for this day care is on the increase. As such, the Kitchener Centre is bursting at the seams and would benefit from additional capacity. Brian had asked Steve if OTC would be involved in a project to raise funds for an extension to the building. This topic will be included on the next meeting’s agenda. Next Meeting - 4th February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


Mercury report for the Council Meeting of Monday 4th February 2013

Public Participation
Isobel Ager-Righinioti The only person wishing to speak at this monthʼs meeting was Isobel Ager-Righinioti. Isobel said that she uses her bike for short journeys around the town in preference to driving a car. One afternoon last July she was riding down West Street and as she drew level with ʻThe Archʼ a car caused her to fall off her bike. She felt that a contributing factor had been the presence of the cobblestones in the road, which she said should not be there on such a narrow street and said she had legal advice confirming this fact. Would it not be better if East Street and West Street were both one-way, she suggested? Deidre Bethune responded, saying that one of the conditions of the planning permission which was granted for the houses served by The Arch was that some form of traffic calming must be provided and the cobbles were not actually part of the highway.

Co-option of new councillor
Following the resignation of Andrew Dooley, a vacancy had arisen on the council and, there being no call from the electorate for an election to fill the post, it fell to the council to fill the post by co-option. Only one candidate had put his name forward for nomination, that being Joe Stacey. Joe was invited by Mayor Steve Clark to give a brief resume of his reasons for wishing to join the council. Joe said he moved to Olney from Suffolk, where he had previously served as a councillor, in July last year and had found it to be a “smashing place”. He had worked for 40 years in the construction industry, he said, and hoped to bring some of this experience in serving on the council. There then followed a short discussion on what was the minimum period of residence before one could become a town councillor, with periods of between one and three years being suggested. Peter Geary said there was no statutory minimum and the council could elect “whoever they wished”. There being no other candidates, Joe was co-opted unopposed and took his seat at the table.

Kitchener Centre
Following the discussion at last monthʼs meeting about a possible extension to the Kitchener Centre, Dr Brian Partridge and centre manager Helena Newbold were present to discuss the proposal. Brian explained that the Kitchener Centre offers day care to older people from Olney and the surrounding villages and, with over a quarter of local people now being over 60, the need for this day care is on the increase. OTC had always been receptive to the needs of the elderly and took up the challenge of getting the centre built when the nearest similar facility was in Newport Pagnell, he said. One of the key roles of the centre was to enable the elderly to continue to live in their own homes rather than go in to residential care but the ability to remain independent becomes less as we grow older. The centre currently provides for 14 people per day between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm, enabling them to have a hot meal, meet other people and be gently supervised. Helena explained that there are two waiting lists in operation: The first is for people wishing to join the service and there are currently nine on the list with another six in progress. The second list is for people who already use the centre but want additional sessions and this currently stands at 12. Sadly, the only way that people move up the list is when others go in to residential care or pass away. The clientele covers a wide range of ages (more than 30 years) and abilities, with some people in their sixties with dementia attending sessions with those in their nineties. Over such a range it was inevitable that people would have different interests and ideally separate sessions should be available for different age groups, she said. Brian concluded by that he was garnering views as to whether there was a perceived need for further provision for the elderly in Olney and the surrounding area but so far the indication were positive. However, he wanted to be sure that if the centre expanded it would continue to be financially viable, particularly when public finances are being cut back. He did not have time to personally spearhead a fundraising campaign, he said, but thought that perhaps an individual with the right skills and sufficient time might be persuaded to volunteer. Ward Councillor Peter Geary suggested that a Business Case should be prepared and funding sought from MKC. Tony Evans said that since the centre opened in 2000, OTC had supported it and thought there was no question that they would want to be involved but wondered what sort of costs were likely to be involved and would it be just for the building and running costs or staffing as well. OTC could help get the ball rolling but agreed it would need someone to manage the fundraising on a full time basis.

East Street Car Park
As previously reported, OTC has sought advice from MKC related to the East Street Car Park extension, prior to it submitting a formal Planning Application. One of the points that MKC identified was that the Football Club had applied for Planning permission to erect a protective fence around their pitch to comply with league regulations and a condition of that permission being granted would be that there must be a six metre over-run area between the football pitch and the fence, The Football Club was subsequently able to argue that the 6m run off area suggested by planning officers was not actually an element of the league regulations, so the officers eventually agreed not to require this as a condition. Steve Clark said there were still a number of issues around the planned car park and the council recognised that an application for car parking may not be popular, so they intend to conduct a survey to gauge the amount of local support. If the outcome is reasonably positive, they would then apply for planning permission. Tony Evans said that in his opinion the town desperately needs more car parking spaces and was passionate that it should go ahead. Peter Geary was sure that there would be flak from residents and said that he did not want the council to start work on the scheme and then back out. He said he, personally, would not be voting for the scheme because it was too expensive for too few additional spaces. Jeremy Rawlings thought that additional parking was required but only at specific times and would only support the scheme if the additional parking was only available as an overflow on match days. John Sharp disagreed, saying that it was needed seven days a week and would be used. The existing East Street (Rugby Club) car park is too far away and too dark, he said. Eventually a vote was taken on whether to progress with the survey which was narrowly passed by four votes to three, the rest of the members present inexplicably choosing to abstain.

Budget and Precept 2013/2014
The finance committee have recommended an increase of 5.84% to the precept. This is the portion of the council tax which is collected by MKC on behalf of OTC. The Income & Expenditure Budget vs. Actual appeared to show a deficit of £15k, although there seemed some doubt as to whether it was a ʻrealʼ deficit. Peter Geary felt that the budget should balance and said that the council needed a plan to reduce the deficit and balance the budget. MKC is capped in terms of the amount it can increase the council tax and OTC could be the same. Tony Evans felt that they were a good set of figures and easily understandable. The budget was passed by a vote of five to three. Electoral Review of Milton Keynes As previously reported, The Local Government Boundary Commission for England has undertaken discussions with MKC and consulted publicly on council size and has decided that the number of councillor should be increased to 57, from the current 51. Each a councillor will cover 3300 residents as opposed to 3000 at present. The draft proposal as now been published and recommends that Milton Keynes be divided into 19 wards, each represented by three councillors. In most of urban MK this is fine but in the rural areas this leaves very large geographical areas with many individual communities requiring individual attention from their councillors in attending parish council meetings etc. For example a merged Sherington and Olney ward would comprise 17 parishes, which Jeremy Rawlings described as ridiculous. Steve Clark proposed that OTCʼs response to the document should be a request to maintain the status quo such that the current Olney ward continues to be represented by two councillors. The motion was passed by five votes to two, again with a number of abstentions.

Neighbourhood Planning
The council had received a copy of the document ʻQuick Guide to Neighbourhood Plansʼ. Since April 2012 local communities have been able to produce Neighbourhood Plans for their local area, putting in place planning policies for the future development and growth of their neighbourhood. The plan is subject to examination and referendum and then forms part of the Local Development Plan. This statutory status gives Neighbourhood Plans far more weight than parish/community plans, such as the  'Olney for You' document that was produced by members of the community over five years ago. Tony Evans thought that a plan for Olney is a 'must do' as it is an opportunity to influence the planners and wondered if it might be possible to reuse some of the Olney for You output. Peter Geary pointed out that if Olney produced a plan ii must fit in with the existing development framework and could not be used to override MKC plans. If, for example, MKC strategy was to build 400 new homes in the town then a Neighbourhood Plan could not be produced proposing no new housing. Unlike Olney for You it would need to be council led and the effort involved would be massive in comparison. Several such plans were being produced elsewhere in Millon Keynes, he said, and were close to going to referendum. The council agreed to set up a working group of members to investigate the feasibility of producing a plan for Olney. 

Superfast Broadband for Olney 
Town Clerk Uarn Costello reported that he'd had meetings with MKC about the position of street cabinets that will be required for superfast broadband to be rolled out in Olney. Pete Geary explained that this is being enabled by an alliance between MKC, Bedford Borough and Central Bedfordshire Councils to provide superfast broadband to areas that are not part of BT's commercial deployment plans, as described in the Councillor Comer article in January's Phonebox. MKC has set aside £2.4m and has won a government grant of £ 140k to appoint a contractor to do the work, the contract being due to be let in August or September this year. However, since the meeting this has been overtaken by the recent announcement from BT that Olney is now part of its own commercial deployment some time in 2014.  Next Meeting - 4th March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th March In the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides Is appropriate.


Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting of March 2013

Public Participation
Claire Wood Claire Wood addressed Councillors about the Church Hall on High Street South. The Church has been considering how the Hall could be better used, and aims to make it meet some of the needs within Olney and be more part of the townʼs community. Itʼs identified some projects to help it meet this aim: a Memory Club for those in the early stages of memory degeneration, a Youth Milkshake Café with two separate strands –to provide a place for secondary school young people to meet after school (initially weekly) and to provide training for them –and New Skill for those who need basic skills training, for example those recently bereaved whose partners had provided for them before. To achieve these projects, some changes to the Church Hall will be starting shortly, including improved access, improved toilet and shower facilities, a new meeting room, a mezzanine floor and a meeting area.

Kitchener Centre
Ann Lark and Nick Stacey from Age UK attended the meeting to discuss the Kitchener Centre, a day care centre for vulnerable older people from in and around Olney. Age UK has been managing the Centre under contract to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) since 2000. The contract to manage the Kitchener Centre and another day care centre in Bletchley, currently run by the British Red Cross (BRC), has been out for competitive tender, the bid process having just been completed. Itʼs not yet known who has won the contract, but Ann and Nick provided background information on what might happen next. First, the BRC did not submit a bid for the Bletchley centre, as running day care centres no longer fits with its national agenda. Second, and most important for Olney, the contract value specified by MKC is significantly below that which Age UK believes is required to continue to offer the current level of service at the Kitchener Centre. Age UK has been given notice to leave the Kitchener Centre later this year unless this issue is resolved. Responding to the clear, though not fully articulated, implications for the standard of care being offered, David Rumens, of Senior Voice MK and previously Olney Town Council (OTC), said his organisation would apply as much pressure to MKC as it could, and will also keep in contact with OTC on the subject. Olney Councillors were also clearly concerned about this issue. In the background, OTCʼs letter to MKC regarding the possibility of an extension has now received a reply, any consideration being put on hold until the end of June when the contract commissioning process should be near completion.

Highways
Andrew Jackman is the new Team Leader for Traffic Management at MKC, having replaced Richard Duffill in the post. Tonight he was attending the Council meeting to discuss various Highways issues in the town. Parking in Oakdown Crescent is a longstanding and contentious issue. Andrew agreed that there was severe pressure on parking there, as had been made clear to him by Ward Councillors Peter Geary and Debbie Brock and stated that, if there was a simple solution, itʼd be in place by now. Peter Geary outlined three current ideas, each with highly approximate ballpark figures: • A new road running from Dagnall Road through The Pyghtle to serve the properties which face it, £250,000. • A car park in the (retained) garden of 102 Weston Road, £85,000. • A residentsʼ parking scheme in Oakdown Crescent, £5,000. As is usual for this issue, a good deal of discussion followed. The main points were that Peter Geary felt OTC should propose a solution, Andrew wanted to understand the problem and have MKC work out the best solution and, when pushed by Ron Bull, Andrew said the issue would be addressed by the end of March 2014. Finally, Debbie Brock noted that the investigative work done so far hadnʼt gone to waste – it would still be useful when choosing the best way forward. The Olney Traffic Management Review in 2008 included the idea of having one-way systems in East Street and West Street. Andrew felt that using a one-way system to calm traffic was an odd idea, since evidence shows that such systems in fact make people drive 5-10 MPH faster. Based on the brief discussion which followed, which saw various Councillors expressing safety concerns regarding East Street, itʼs hard to see the one-way idea progressing further. Regarding potholes, Andrew explained that the Highways Authority has a duty to maintain roads in a safe condition. All roads are inspected regularly at least once a year. Defects, whether spotted during inspections or reported by members of the public, are dealt with in 24 hours if classified as dangerous or 28 days otherwise. The general condition of the roads has been contributed to by bad winters causing water which has penetrated the road to freeze and lift the surface. Insufficient maintenance on a national basis hasnʼt helped either. MKC is developing plans for a pothole month, likely April, during which the Council would deploy many road gangs to blitz the problem.

Fairʼs fair
OTC agreed to requests to hold the annual fair on the Recreation Ground between Wednesday 19th and Saturday 22nd June, and the Cherry Fair on the Glebe on Saturday 29th June.

Olney Centre facilities
Great news for those who attend Council meetings but, by the end, feel like theyʼve missed out on the interesting bits. OTC has received quotes to improve the Olney Centreʼs facilities for the hard of hearing. One quote was for a fixed system, building on the hearing aid induction loop already fitted in the Council Chamber and supplying boundary microphones and an amplifier. The other also provided microphones but, instead of using the existing induction loop, provided earphones and two mini loops which the hard of hearing could wear around their necks. No decision was made on the night, but one or both systems will be trialled during a real Council meeting.

Fields
Liam noted that the hedge laying on Crouchʼs Field has been completed. Also, the gate into Crouchʼs Field has been moved to comply with the right of way through to Nichols Field - the field to the East of Crouch's Field beside the river.

East Street Car Park
There was a brief discussion about the proposed extension to the East Street Car Park, particularly including how it would adjoin the proposed fencing around the Recreation Ground football pitch. Joe Stacey noted that, while a concrete path is planned to go all the way round the pitch, thatʼs not an FA requirement – the FA requires hard standing on only two sides. He suggested instead that the path at the East Street end could be removed from the proposals, thus creating more space for parking which currently looks pretty tight. Although the Football Club does have planning permission, and OTC as landlord has given its permission, OTC could change its permission if the Council felt that section of the path should not be included. The Council will discuss the issue with the Football Club.

Community Asset Transfer and the Olney Centre
Back in February 2012, Alan Richardson stated and Peter Geary confirmed that the Olney Centre was not an asset which would be affected by the Community Asset Transfer (CAT) scheme, as it was not MKCʼs asset to transfer. Now, however, legal opinions about this differ. The Olney Centre is held in a trust and, until recently, was believed to be owned by that trust and not by MKC, even though the trustees are wholly that Council. Day to day, MKC is responsible for certain aspects of the repair of the building while OTC is responsible for other aspects. The ownership of the Centre has been challenged, with the Queenʼs Counsel (QC) and the Charity Commission having been asked for advice. The QCʼs advice was that the Olney Centre was the property of the trust and hence could not be transferred. However, the Charity Commission believes that, since around £400 was paid on the transfer of the building in 1870, it seems to have been purchased by the predecessor to Buckinghamshire County Council, then reverted to that Council when it formed, and then to MKC in 1996. It is therefore currently thought that the property could be transferred under the CAT programme to a community organisation or group such as OTC. MKC is to arrange a Public Meeting at the Olney Centre at 6.00pm on Wednesday 22nd May to explain CAT and how it affects the Olney Centre. This may well be a very interesting meeting. Mercury thanks Peter Geary and Liam Costello for background information on this topic. Next Meeting - 8th April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 8th April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting of April 2013

Public Participation
David Rumens There was only one member of the public wishing to speak at this month’s meeting and that was ex-Olney Town Councillor David Rumens speaking on behalf of Senior Voice MK. David explained that the contract to run the Kitchener Centre was recently put out to tender by Milton Keynes Council and they had set a tender value of £312,000. Age UK is the only organisation to have tendered for the contract but its tender was rejected as it was substantially above MKC’s valuation. This raised the question of whether the original tender was correctly valued, he said. The fact that there was only one bid from an existing provider and that it exceeded the tender value by a considerable sum suggested that something may have gone wrong during the tender valuation process. There is considerable concern being expressed about the ability of Milton Keynes Council to deliver a Day Care Service at an equivalent standard on the allocated budget both now and in the future, he said. As things stand the service will be brought in house and decision will be made by Councillor Debbie Brock, as Cabinet Member of MKC with Portfolio responsibility for Adult, Older Years and Health, as to whether the council or Milton Keynes Service Partnership will manage the Day Care Service. This matter was discussed as a formal agenda item later in the meeting and David was invited to stay for that discussion.

Superfast Broadband
Present at this month’s meeting was Nick Brown from MKC planning department. Nick explained that his role was to negotiate with Openreach to identify the best locations for the additional street cabinets that are necessary to contain the equipment that provides the service. They need to be located as near as possible to the existing cabinets which they connect to. There is one such cabinet in the High Street opposite the Flower Shop and the proposed site of the equipment cabinet is in the Market Place, opposite Darwins Gifts and Cards. Nick explained that it could not be positioned next to the existing cabinet due to the requirement for Openreach to access the cabinet every time a customer was set up for the service, which would restrict access on the footpath. The proposed position would enable parking while the engineer carried out the work, he said. The usual locations selected were footpaths, which MKC own as part of the highway, so there are no issues with access. The member present felt that the box would be rather obtrusive in the proposed location so agreed to Nick’s request for it to be moved back a few feet on to the Market Place and rotated by 90 degrees so that it was parallel with the wall for the planter. Nick said he expected work to commence in 6-8 weeks.

Future of the Kitchener Centre
As reported last month, Age UK has been managing the Centre under contract to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) since 2000. The contract to manage the Kitchener Centre had been out for competitive tender and the bid process has just been completed. There had been 10 Expressions of Interest but only Age UK had tendered and its application had been rejected because it is £100,000 more than MKC’s tender value of £312,000. Jeremy Rawlings said the decision could be ‘called in’ if 20 members of the electorate requested it and suggested that David Rumens went down that route’. Why had the other nine parties declined to bid, he wondered. Could it be that the indicative price had put them off? He also observed that OTC only had Age UK’s estimate that it would cost more to run the service, since no other bids had been submitted. David Rumens said that as part of the bid process any interested party could submit questions and the answer would be made available to all of the other parties so they would have been fully aware that that Age UK had received no replies. Debbie Brock said that due diligence had been applied and MKC were confident that £312,000 to run the service is a realistic figure and as portfolio holder she felt that ‘internalisation’ is the best option. Jeremy said that, with respect to Debbie, MKC did not have a good track record on due diligence. Debbie said that good grounds would have to exist in order for the decision to be called in, but Jeremy replied that Age UK’s expert opinion that the service could not be run within that financial constraint should be sufficient. Jeremy formally proposed that OTC recommend that the decision should be called in. The motion was seconded by Deidre Bethune and passed by a large majority.

Parking in Oakdown Crescent
Following on from last month’s discussion about the Parking in Oakdown Crescent there was an item on this month’s agenda to discuss one of the options: A new road running from Dagnall Road through The Pyghtle to serve the properties which face it, i.e. numbers 70 – 92 Weston Road. This scheme would involve the council relinquishing part of The Pyghtle, which caused some consternation to members. Steve Clark observed that when permission was granted for the houses on The Pyghtle there was a condition that at least half of the land must be retained for recreational use. Even if OTC agreed to relinquish the land it was unlikely that MKC would fund the scheme he said, since it was estimated that it would cost £250K. John Sharp noted that part of the problem with parking in Oakdown Crescent was due to the fact that a fence that previously existed had fallen down. If that was reinstated then there would be no shortcut making parking there less attractive, he thought. Peter Geary stated that because the fence had been down for a number of years it was now effectively a right of way. Joe Stacey wondered if providing parking spaces in the garden of the houses in Oakdown Crescent might alleviate the situation but Peter Geary pointed out that most of the cars parked there did not belong to residents. (Mercury wondered if this might be a passing reference to the revolutionary ‘Driveway Parking Scheme’ announced in the April edition of The Phonebox, as did a number of other councillors, apparently!) Deidre Bethune proposed that the scheme be rejected in favour of one of the cheaper alternatives: parking spaces on the retained garden of 102 Weston Road. This was seconded and passed unanimously, meaning that every member present voted. This is a most unusual occurrence for OTC.

Community Defibrillator at Recreation Ground
The Joint User Group (JUG) has recommended that a defibrillator be located at the recreation ground for the use of the various sports clubs that use it. Steve Clark wondered if the clubs would be prepared to assist with funding and Town Clerk Liam Costello said that the individual clubs had schemes through which funding would be available. It would be housed in a lockable unit with a key or combination given out in a controlled manner. Alan Richardson wondered whether such a unit should also be located at the Olney Centre. It was agreed that OTC would contribute £1500 for the installation of a community defibrillator at the Olney Centre and £1000 for one at the Recreation Ground.

Olney Brass request for funding
The council have been asked to consider a request from Olney Brass that they award a grant of £2.5K towards the running costs of the youth section of Olney Brass for the coming year, possibly from the Community (previously Sydney Dix) Fund. As part of the application Olney Brass were required to submit a copy of their accounts and on inspection the council agreed to the request.

Exclusion of Public and Press Representatives
Whenever matters are to be discussed that the council deems to be of a confidential nature the following item appears on the agenda: ‘To consider exclusion of Public and Press Representatives pursuant to the Public Bodies (admission to meetings) Act 1960 on the basis that publicity would be prejudicial to the public interests by the confidential nature of the business to be transacted’. Joe Stacey questioned whether the item to be discussed warranted the exclusion of the public and press, since it was a matter of public interest. Debbie Brock agreed, saying that she had often questioned the rationale behind such exclusions. Peter Geary was of the opinion that because the matter was of a financial nature relating to the tendering of contracts this justified the exclusion. The council resolved to seek guidance from Bucks Association of Local Councils on when exclusion is justified. For information, the draft minutes published on OTC’s website state: The council considered quotations for surfacing work at the Recreation Ground. As all three contractors had provided different specifications, they are to be asked to re-quote on a like for like basis. 

Annual Town Meeting - Thursday 2nd May
This will take place at 7:00 pm on Thursday 2nd May in the Olney Centre and all Olney residents are invited to attend to question the council on any matter of concern to them. If you want to know why the precept you pay to OTC as part of the Council Tax has risen by 5.8% this year, why we may lose part of the recreation ground to a car park or have any other concerns, then come along and exercise your democratic right. 

Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for May 2013

Public Participation
Brian Rice In this slot, Brian Rice spoke about parking in Oakdown Crescent. First, some background on this issue: In last month's meeting, Councillors rejected the option of a new road through the Pyghtle, reluctant to relinquish the land and believing that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) wouldn't finance the £250,000 projected ballpark cost. Instead, they unanimously agreed that the best solution would be to provide parking spaces on the retained garden of 102 Weston Road. They also discussed to what extent the lack of a previously existing fence, now allowing access from Oakdown Crescent to the back of the properties 70 - 92 Weston Road, was affecting the parking problem.  Brian made a number of points. He stated that the agreed solution would provide parking for only around six cars, when around double that was needed. He also felt that the projected cost of the new road was far too high, around £80,000 being realistic which, as it happens, is remarkably close to the ballpark cost of the agreed solution. Finally, Brian felt that the fence referred to had never existed, so access had always been available. John Sharp disagreed, saying there'd not always been access. A 1945 picture of the area, courtesy of Google Earth, appears to show that there was access at that time, though that in itself implies nothing about the situation when Oakdown Crescent was built. Mercury thanks Liam Costello for background information on this point.

Annual elections and appointments
The Mayor and Deputy Mayor were elected, this time round Steve Clark and Jeremy Rawlings being re-elected to their respective roles. Committee Chairs and members were appointed, almost completely unchanged from last year.  Usually, Standing Orders are formally adopted with little change but, this time, adoption was postponed pending change and review. Specifically, Deidre Bethune wanted to make them less gender-specific (i.e. male) and, following a debate started by Joe Stacey, there was general discussion about whether or not Committees should provide reports to full Council meetings. This latter point meant that the Council will review the Scheme of Delegation to Committees and Staff. 

Inventory review
Always an interesting topic, Councillors reviewed Olney Town Council's (OTC's) inventory of land and assets. Council regulations state that fixed cost accounting must be used, meaning that each item is listed with its purchase cost, these not being depreciated over time. Peter Geary and Joe Stacey felt that it'd be helpful to also include each item's replacement value. Tony Evans brought the ensuing debate to a close, stating that "We have to accept that these figures are absolutely meaningless", and "move on". 

The Kitchener Centre
This has become a contentious topic, with enough background information and vociferous disagreement to fill an article on its own. To fit the most into the space available, and try to keep it interesting, this is a mix of what occurred in the meeting and the background to it.  provides day care in Olney. As reported last month, the contract to manage the Centre had been out for competitive tender, and the bid process had completed with ten expressions of interest but only one bid, from the incumbent provider, Age UK. That bid was rejected because it was around £100,000 more than the price for which MKC believed it could manage the Centre in-house. So, that's what it decided to do. OTC disagreed with this decision, so voted by majority to call it in. As a result, two meetings on this topic took place between OTC and MKC.  The first meeting was adjourned after some delay. Steve Clark attended, and believes the delay was due to evidence, thought to be from MKC Officers, having been submitted late to the members of the panel, allowing too little time for proper consideration. Peter Geary believes it was due to there being insufficient supporting information for the committee to reach a conclusion.  Jeremy Rawlings attended the second meeting. He'd presented the Council's case that MKC's decision to manage the Kitchener Centre in-house should be called in. Debbie Brock, MKC Councillor and OTC Ward Councillor, had then presented the opposing case. Both presentations had been 'robust'.  Jeremy noted that the Officers who were justifying MKC's costs said that various management items, for example human resources, payroll and training, could be absorbed by Council departments with no impact on their budgets and thus not appear in MKC's contract price. The cost quoted by Age UK for these items was £45,000, and Jeremy felt that 'absorbing' such significant and real cost was impossible for a smaller organisation such as Age UK. A vote was taken, OTC lost, so the decision stands: MKC will manage the Kitchener Centre. Peter Geary, also MKC Councillor and OTC Ward Councillor, replied with his view. Peter felt that OTC needed to understand what it had agreed to when it decided to present its case to call in the decision: It delayed the process, which resulted in MKC having to extend care provision using the current providers at both the Kitchener Centre and the Bletchley day care site, thus putting care at risk if either provider had refused this extension. Peter cited the £45,000 Age UK management figure, questioning why OTC had backed Age UK quoting this amount when the spend would not be necessary if MKC ran the service. He also stated that the credibility of OTC had taken a nosedive, due to it presenting flawed figures, thus succeeding in uniting the MKC parties round the table to an extent rarely achieved, with the vote being eight to one against calling in the decision - there was no case to answer. He noted that OTC would shortly be asking MKC Officers to expand the Kitchener Centre, 'within weeks of effectively calling the same Officers liars'.  Tony Evans had heard enough. Forcefully disagreeing with Peter, he said that the first meeting had been 'a farce', that MKC had its figures incorrect and that if Peter didn't like OTC, he should 'get off it'.  Steve Clark called the discussion to a halt. Note that, if you're wondering why Debbie didn't express her views, she was absent from this meeting.  Mercury thanks Steve Clark, Jeremy Rawlings and Peter Geary for background on this issue. 

Naval Cadet Corps 
A while ago, the Naval Cadet Corps had identified a derelict building near the Emberton Park cafe and, with permission, started repairing it to make it suitable for use as the centre for a new Olney based Cadet Group. The Corps aims to start the new group soon, accepting children from eight to eighteen years living in Olney and the surrounding villages.  The work thus far has been paid for by the Corps, and thus money is very tight. In order to help complete this work, the Corps are now seeking a £4,500 grant from OTC. Councillors were generally sympathetic to the request but required more information in order to make a decision. So, a Corps representative will be invited to the next meeting.

Speed Indicator Display units
Speed Indicator Display units (SIDs) are the live vehicle speed indication devices you sometimes see on lampposts. Behind the scenes, they also note recorded speeds and times, the resulting data often proving useful to analyse traffic patterns and general driver behaviour.  Due to a recruitment freeze in MKC's road safety team, and MKC's SIDs needing replacement, it's inviting Town Councils to either purchase their own SIDs or to participate in a loan and operate scheme, where they'd borrow the SIDs and be trained to deploy and operate the units themselves. The Council liked the loan and operate scheme, and will tell MKC it would like to participate. 
Private and confidential?

At the end of most OTC meetings, Councillors vote 'to consider exclusion of Public and Press Representatives pursuant to the Public Bodies (admission to meetings) Act 1960 on the basis that publicity would be prejudicial to the public interests by the confidential nature of the business to be transacted'. This mouthful is almost invariably agreed, and Mercury, along with any remaining members of the Public make their way home, while Councillors stay to discuss the confidential business. It tends to get used to cover items such as personnel matters, where its use is uncontroversial, and tenders, where it isn't.  Councillors had received guidance on the legislation and how to interpret it. The initial position should always be in favour of disclosing as much information as possible about the decisions the Council takes, and only in limited circumstances should information be withheld, where there's justification, in law, for doing so. The relevant considerations in favour of disclosure include openness and accountability for tender processes and prices.  After some debate, in which it was clear that there was general agreement in favour of openness, Councillors agreed that tenders would not generally be regarded as confidential, and that the names of the companies and organisations concerned would be anonymised. This common practice would prevent, for example, one company gaining business-critical information from another's quotation. 

Anemometer
It was mentioned in passing that a planning application had been received from RWE npower renewables for a temporary 80 metre anemometer on land at Bozeat Grange, just South of Bozeat. For more information, surf to planning.wellingborough.gov.uk/portal, click Application Search, enter Reference number WP/2013/0162 and click Search.

Hanging baskets
The hanging baskets in the town during the Summer months, bar those around the Market Square, are all sponsored by local companies, organisations and individuals. Ron Bull, who's kindly organised this sponsorship in recent years, is not able to run it this time due to health reasons. As a result, the Council has stepped in and is starting to organise sponsorship for this year. So, if you've had a basket in the last few years, it'll be the Council approaching you to see if you'd like to sponsor one again this time round.  If you're a company, organisation or individual who'd like to sponsor a basket this year, please contact the Council by calling Liam or Sandra on 01234 711679, or emailing them at townclerk@ olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. Each basket has an individual plaque showing the name of its sponsor.

Buses 
As a result of MKC budget cuts, the Number 1 bus service between Olney and Milton Keynes will be considerably reduced from 2nd June - surf to www.milton-keynes.gov. uk/bus/documents/1.pdf. Essentially, most of the evening buses will be cut, and there'll be no buses at all on Sundays. The Council will ask MKC if any of these evening buses could be reintroduced.  Next Meeting 3rd June The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd June in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for June 2013

Public Participation
Samantha Chapman Samantha Chapman spoke about the cuts to the bus serice between Olney and Milton Keynes which have taken place since the beginning of June. Samantha said that as someone who works in Milton Keynes she was a regular user of the late evening bus service, which had now been cut. As a result she was now unable to work late nights and Sundays. She felt that it was unfair to penalise residents of Olney who do not have access to a car, particularly when the majority of shops do not shut until 8.00 pm. This subject was an agenda item later in the meeting so it was agreed to move it to become the first item.  Bob Blackie The next person to speak was Bob Blackie from the United Reformed Church. Bob said that the URC would be holding a flower festival on Friday 12th and Saturday 13th July, followed by a service on Sunday 14th. He thanked the council for their generous donation towards the running of the event and invited all councillors to attend.

Cuts to Bus service
As reported last month and discussed in public participation, because of Milton Keynes Council budget cuts, the Number 1 Arriva bus service between Olney and Milton Keynes has been considerably reduced. The last bus leaves Central MK at 19:18 and there are no Arriva buses at all on Sundays. Northampton based Meridian Bus will now be running a new service 101 on Sunday from Lavendon to Central MK, but this is being run as a commercial initiative and is not subsidised by MKC. Deidre Bethune was unhappy that Olney Town Council had not been consulted but recognised that it would not be possible to get all services reinstated. She wondered if it would be possible to get a specific evening bus reinstated. MKC ward councillor Peter Geary said that the council had a £20m revenue challenge and the original proposals had been far worse. One possibility could be provision of a linking bus from Newport Pagnell to the villages, he said, but consideration would need to be given to the likely demand and cost. Tony Evans said he'd had a lot of representation from young people, who are not the sort of people who come to meetings of OTC (and looking round the room, Mercury was inclined to agree!). The cuts had made it difficult for them to get to MK for an evening out, he said. The issue will be raised at the next meeting of the N.E. Area Forum.

Naval Cadet Corps 
As reported last month, the Naval Cadet Corps have identified a derelict building near the Emberton Park cafe and, with permission, started repairing it to make it suitable for use as the centre for a new Olney based Cadet Group. The work thus far has been paid for by the Corps, and in order to complete this work, the Corps is now seeking a £4,500 grant from OTC. Cdr. David Moth was present to explain more about the group and how the money would be spent. David explained that the Corps had now leased the building for a peppercorn rent from MKC and were refurbishing it at no cost to them. The group  will give boys and girls from the age of 8 - 18 from Olney and the surrounding villages the chance to learn about and participate in activities such as climbing, sailing and camping. A similar unit at Leighton Buzzard was created a year and a half a with 5 cadets now has a membership of 40 he said. Deidre Bethune noted that a large amount of the requested grant was to be spent on catering equipment and wondered if this was necessary at the start of the venture. David explained that all of the equipment had to be new and child friendly, due to Health and Safety regs, because it would be used by the cadets as part of their training in seamanship. Jeremy Rawlings proposed that the council award the full amount of £4500 but it was not passed by a majority on the vote. A subsequent vote to award a lesser amount of £3000 was passed with the understanding that the Corps can seek further funding at a later date.

Church Hall renovation
The Parochial Church Council are undertaking a major refurbishment of the Church Hall in order for it to be used for a number of community uses, including a memory club for those experiencing memory loss and a youth cafe. The PCC is seeking a grant of £5000 towards the cost of renewing the floor in the entire building and provided a very thorough cost breakdown of the entire project. The total costs for the renovation are in the order of £163K, £119K of which has already been raised and the total cost of the floor renewal is £12.5K. The council voted to grant the full £5000 requested.

The Olney Centre Community Asset Transfer
OTC has been offered the opportunity to obtain the freehold of the Olney Centre from MKC under the Community Asset Transfer scheme. MKC had recently held a public meeting at the centre to explain the options and see if there were any parties interested in moving forward with the scheme. It came as a surprise to the members of OTC who attended that OTC is not the only interested party and a private developer was also in the running. Tony Evans was of the opinion that this meant that OTC had no option but to start the process as soon as possible and Jeremy Rawlings agreed, saying that it appeared that any commercial company could join in the bidding process. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that under the rules of the scheme the bidding had to be open to all but unless the applicant met the strict community usage criteria they would not progress to the next stage. There are a number of safeguards in place and the process can be stopped at any time. Tony said that if OTC was successful then MKC would hand ownership to them but would not do any maintenance prior to the transfer. A survey conduct two years ago had revealed that the building was 'not about to fall down' but there were a number of things that needed doing. Ben Brock was of the opinion that a full survey should be carried out as part of the transfer process. Town Clerk Liam Costello reminded members that the building came with a 'sitting tenant' of the MKC Library Service. Tony Evans proposed that OTC progress with stage 1 of the transfer process, which was passed unanimously. 

Future of MKC Parish Wardens 
A letter has been received from MKC explaining that the Parish Warden posts were created nearly a decade ago from central government funding and subsequently picked up by themselves. MKC now wish to 'delete' the six remaining warden posts, four of which are currently occupied. This came as something of a surprise to most members of OTC as they had no idea that Olney even had a warden or what duties they actually perform. Peter Geary explained that the wardens spent on average half a day per week in their allocated parish and could perform duties such as enforcing dog fouling fines, supporting the police and PCSOs etc. Castlethorpe Parish Council is currently undertaking a trial of directly funding a warden on an hourly basis to enforce a dog control area. Deidre Bethune suggested that OTC might be interested if the Castlethorpe trial actually resulted in some penalty notices being issued. Jeremy Rawlings suggested that OTC request a breakdown of what the wardens have contributed to Olney over the past few months before deciding what to do, which was agreed. 

Council protocols
During the meeting there were a number of separate discussions around the way that OTC conducts its business and manages its finances and these are summarised here. During the item concerning the Internal Audit Joe Stacey said that the council did not appear to have proper and adequate control over the spending of sub committees. Tony Evans replied saying that he believed this was not the case. Each subcommittee has devolved authority to spend up to £2k and all expenditure has to be authorised by the full council. Later in the meeting Joe requested that any item that was not resolved at a meeting should be an agenda item at future meetings until it is resolved. He felt that there was a risk of items simply 'dropping off' as things stand. Earlier in the meeting he had noted an issue that had not appeared in the official minutes of a previous meeting but had been covered in the Mercury report of the same meeting. Debbie Brock suggested the setting up of an issues register. Joe thought that as a matter of routine all committees should summarise the decisions they have made to the full council. Jeremy Rawlings pointed out that the minutes of all committee meetings are circulated to the full council but Joe felt that this did not give members the chance to ask questions. Liam Costello said that there was a risk that each meeting could end up effectively being held twice. Peter Geary proposed that these issues should be covered in a future debate about the council's Standing Orders. 

Odds and sods 
Jeremy Rawlings said that in due course the Youth Club would be up for consideration as a candidate for the Community Asset Transfer scheme. He wondered if the same individual who had shown an interest in the Olney Centre would also be bidding.  Liam Costello reported that High Street South will be closed for resurfacing from 19th to 28th August and during this time all traffic will be diverted along Weston Road and Aspreys.  The new Mayor of Milton Keynes, Brian White, will be in attendance at next month's meeting to address the council.  And finally ... Tony Evans observed that the banks along Driftway were looking good but MKC should be reminded of the requirement for regular mowing if they are to remain that way.  Next Meeting - 1st July The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 1st July in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 

Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for July 2013

Introduction
Steve Clark started the meeting by saying how wonderful it was to see Ron bull take his place back in the Council Chamber.

Public Participation
Brian Rice Now almost a regular at these meetings, Brian Rice spoke about parking in Oakdown Crescent. In an earlier meeting, Councillors had referred to ballpark costs for two possible ways to address the issue: £80,000 to provide parking in the retained garden of 102 Weston Road, and £250,000 to provide an access road through the Pyghtle. Sceptical of these figures, Brian asked if Olney Town Council (OTC) had investigated whether they were correct. Questioning the lack of consultation on the proposals, he reported that residents thought the 102 Weston Road proposal was 'funny'.  Liam Costello explained that OTC was still waiting for Milton Keynes Council (MKC) to propose a scheme and, once it did, it would be put to public consultation in due course. Peter Geary and Debbie Brock, OTC's Ward Councillors on MKC, said that a scheme should be proposed by MKC in this financial year.  Brian White Brian White, Milton Keynes Mayor, attended the start of the meeting. He wanted to show that the Mayoralty wasn't just for Milton Keynes town, but for the whole borough and, to do this, he aimed to be seen in every Parish. He also promoted the need for a two way flow of information between MKC and OTC. He spoke briefly about his two nominated Charities for the year: the International Campaign to Ban Land Mines (www.icbl.org), and Ted's Gang (www.tedsgang.co.uk), a local Charity supporting children with Shwachman Diamond Syndrome. 

Youth Centre grant application
Jeremy Rawlings introduced this item before, along with others, leaving the meeting having earlier declared a pecuniary interest. MKC doesn't fund youth work for the under 13s and, about 15 years ago, Olney Youth Centre felt it would be good to provide a service for that age group. So, it started an under 13s night on the first and third Mondays of each month, staffed by volunteers without the benefit of Council funding. These nights grew in popularity and now regularly attract 50-60 children. As they grew, they became harder to manage without professional help and, for the last two years, OTC has funded a professional Youth Worker to run them alongside the volunteers. The Youth Centre would like to continue funding this position, and is applying for a £1 200 grant to cover it for another year. With the various Councillors having left the meeting, those remaining discussed the item briefly before approving the application.

Parish Wardens 
Peter Geary introduced this item, explaining that about three quarters of the 17 Parish Wardens in Milton Keynes Borough area are currently employed by Parishes, the balance being employed by MKC and generally working in the smaller Parishes. These roles were cut from MKC's budget last year and one year's grace given to allow Parishes to buy in to paint for their work as a service. For example, OTC might decide to pay £4680 per year for half a day a week of Parish Warden time. Either way, it needs to decide on the first year by the end of September. Examples of a Parish Warden's duties include weekly patrols for dog fouling and littering, and checks for household waste being put out early. This was discussed at length, the main points including that the Wardens may be trained to implement road closures, and an interesting explanation of how dog fouling enforcement works. In order to issue a ticket for dog fouling in an area not under a dog control order, a Warden has to be visible and prominent, watch the deed being done, watch the owner walk away, offer a bag and challenge the owner to pick up, and only on their refusal can the Warden issue a ticket. Most owners pick up when challenged, hence so few tickets being issued. Compare that with the more straightforward situation in which an area might be covered by a dog control order which, amongst other things, mandates that no dogs are allowed.  Jeremy Rawlings proposed that OTC sign up for half a day a week of Warden time for a year. A vote was taken, and carried with all in favour bar two abstentions. 

Road closure
The A509 will be closed for resurfacing between its junctions with Weston Road and Lavendon Road for approximately 8 days, the proposed start date being Monday 19th August. Local traffic will be diverted via Weston Road, Aspreys and Driftway, and through traffic diverted via the outskirts of Bramham on the A422 and A428.

Traffic regulation order 
In order to alleviate problems due to vehicles parking on or near various West Street junctions and on the North side of Spring Lane towards the High Street, MKC is considering introducing waiting restrictions, denoted by double yellow lines. Further, due to a request from a nearby resident, the existing restrictions on Spinney Hill Road opposite the School are being changed to allow more flexibility with parking outside the School's pick up and drop off times. 

Scheme of delegation
The proposed scheme set out the circumstances in which the Town Clerk and various Committees are authorised to act with delegated authority. So, while it seems pretty mundane, it's actually very important to the smooth running of the Council. For example, the scheme proposed that the Town Clerk can authorise emergency expenditure of up to £2,000 without requiring the approval of full Council.  The ensuing discussion centred mainly on one particular aspect of the scheme: the way in which Committees report their work to full Council meetings. Steve Clark explained that, in the past, this reporting would sometimes result in full Council reopening and debating recommendations made by the Committees, thus wasting time and lengthening Council meetings. Joe Stacey felt that since Committees would now be reporting on decisions rather than recommendations, these debates simply would not happen, and meetings would in fact be shorter.  The scheme of delegation was approved. 

Bus services 
Following on from the issue covered in previous Mercury reports, meetings are being held to see if it would be possible to reinstate a small number of the cut services. Peter Geary noted that the critical cost was that which MKC would need to pay to subsidise a service, per person per journey, and that, if this was less than £2.50, reinstatement may be possible. 

Core planning strategy
MKC will be talking with Olney and Newport Pagnell Town Councils about additional land allocation for small housing developments, with the Town Councils having a say on where these pieces of land might be. Peter Geary stressed the importance of this issue - local Councils should be able to have their say on housing and retail planning in their areas. 

Hanging baskets 
Ron Bull usually organises sponsorship for the hanging baskets on the High Street and Yardley Road, and recruits a team of people to put them up. It wasn't possible for him to do so this year, so alternative arrangements were made. He thanked Liam and Sandra for arranging sponsorship, and Mark Luckin, TOG, the Lions and others for putting them up. 
Next Meeting - 2nd September The next meeting wlll be held at 7 .30pm on Monday 2nd September in the Councll Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always weloome to attend and, If they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 


There was no Olney Town Council meeting in August 2013


Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for September 2013

Monday 1st July 2013
It was the start of a new term and the chums of Olney town Council were excitedly telling each other what ripping adventures they'd got up to during the long summer vac…..

Bench outside the Carlton House Club
For many years Olney Town Council (OTC) had received requests for a bench somewhere in the middle of the High Street, so that pedestrians could rest on the long walk from one end of town to the other. The location of the bench had been the cause of considerable debate and eventually OTC had agreed to site it at the front of the Carlton House Club. At the time there had been objections from the club and the United Reformed Church, both fearing that it would lead to an increase in rowdy behaviour outside their premises. The council had agreed to review the situation after six months so Town Clerk Liam Costello had written to both organisations in July. No response had been received from The Carlton House Club and the URC had responded saying that they had not observed any adverse impacts. A number of councillors said they had observed the bench being used and felt it had been a success.

Cattle Market car park
This car park is owned by Milton Keynes Council (MKC) and some years ago bollards were placed at the Freemans Garden entrance to stop drivers ‘joy riding’ around the car park. This has caused issues to drivers who, finding that there are no spare spaces, have to back out on to Silver End. A number of suggestions had been considered by the Neighbourhood Action Group but the eventual proposal that they recommended to OTC was to lose half a parking space to the right of the current ‘keep clear’ bay to create a wider area for vehicles to turn in – creating 1.5 spaces for vehicles to turn in but losing an additional parking space. The half space could be used for a motorcycle bay. OTC agreed to support the NAG proposal.

Olney Centre Zebra Crossing
In order to increase the visibility for car drivers and pedestrians alike, bollards have been placed to prevent cars parking close to the crossing. However, due to the ‘imaginative parking’ for which Olney residents have become renowned it is still possible to squeeze cars into the gaps between the road and the pavement via the crossing itself.  The NAG has requested that more bollards be erected in order to prevent such opportunities. MKC Traffic Management Team have supported this suggestion and proposed that eight new bollards be installed. Colin Rodden was not in favour of the plan saying that he felt there were enough “large bits of metal” in the area already. He suggested that the solution would be to enforce the existing parking restrictions.   Though some members were sympathetic to this idea the consensus was that the traffic wardens do not attend regularly enough to do this. Mayor Steve Clark proposed that OTC support the installation of the extra bollards and Rosemary Osbourne seconded the proposal. It was passed by a majority with one vote against.

Road junction improvements
Plans for two schemes had been received from MKC. The first is a remodelling of the road system by The Knoll at the north end of town. The proposal is intended to make Yardley Road less appealing to HGVs and ensure that they use the more suitable A509 Wellingborough Road.  Tony Evans agreed with the aim saying that drivers were using Yardley road to save “a Farthings worth of diesel”. (For readers born after 1960 Mercury should explain that a Farthing was a quarter of an old penny, or 1/960 of a pound!).  The plan involves reducing the width of the roadway in a number of places and creating more traditional T junctions. Some of the space thus gained is proposed to be used to create additional parking spaces, eight of which will be on newly created space adjacent. MKC Ward Councillor Peter Geary said the costs would be in the region of £70k – to £80k and members seemed generally in favour of the scheme, although Tony Evans said it was important to maintain the character of The Knoll. The second scheme is for the long awaited improvements to the Weston Road/High Street junction by the Hallelujah Lamppost. The intention here is to slightly relocate the lamppost and remodel the island such that traffic turning left or right from Weston Road would need to keep to the left of the island. Traffic travelling from the south and turning left into Weston Road would do so as now. Traffic travelling from the north and wishing to turn right into Weston Road would do so via a new filter lane, keeping to the left of the new island. A new tactile paved crossing point would be provided on Weston Road by the entrance to the Coop and another on the High Street to the south of the junction with a central refuge.  This scheme caused more discussion than the first with Peter Geary observing that it was the eighth such proposal for this junction and none had been perfect, although he was less convinced of the merits of this one than some of the previous ones. Jeremy Rawlings disliked the amount of road markings and said he had quite enjoyed the lack of white lines during the recent resurfacing work, but Ward Councillor Debbie Brock said it was necessary for such a complex junction.  Mercury noted that it did not appear to address the issue of access to and from the Coop car park which was one of the problems with the previous schemes.

Landscape maintenance and associated services
MKC has recently approved a procurement process to test the market in terms of both cost and service standards as part of a ‘value for money’ review of the landscape services that include grass cutting, shrub, hedge and tree maintenance and weed control. OTC has been asked whether it wishes MKC to retain responsibility for the services, which would be put out to tender, or take responsibility for the services themselves. If they opted to take responsibility themselves they would receive an apportionment of the current budget, expected to be in the region of £24.25k.  Tony Evans was of the opinion that it would be good for OTC to control all maintenance but felt that the figure quoted would only “scratch the surface” of the actual cost. The expense of employing an extra person, purchasing the necessary equipment and depreciation thereof could easily exceed £50k, he thought. Debbie Brock was keen that OTC should not dismiss the idea without doing a full desktop estimate of how much it would cost. John Boardman asked if OTC had received any complaints about the existing level of service, which caused considerable amusement amongst members who have regularly listened to Tony Evans’ complaints about the state of the banks on Driftway.  He quickly qualified the question with “from the public” and Peter Geary replied that there had been numerous complaints in the last year. Jeremy Rawlings was of the opinion that if MKC continued to provide the service the standard would get steadily worse as they continued to cut costs, but Peter Geary said that by outsourcing MKC would get better value and standards would improve. Ron Bull said that OTC should take on the work and it was a golden opportunity for them to employ a young person as an apprentice.  Tony Evans suggested that the matter should be fully investigated with all the facts and figures, since OTC prides itself on the way it looks after its assets. It was agreed to invite Andy Hudson, Head of Environment and Waste at MKC to attend a future meeting to address the council.

Play areas
MKC has received a Section 106 financial contribution of £35,584.33 as planning gain from the residential development off Yardley road. This money has to be spent on improvements to public space and play areas in the town and expires in May 2017. In a letter to OTC they pointed out that some of the equipment at Dagnall Road and the recreation ground is nearing the end of its useable life and does not comply with current regulations. There are also issues with the structural fencing and equipment at the Cowper Tannery site. Tony Evans was concerned that MKC was suggesting using the money to replace equipment nearing the end of its life, since MKC were obliged to replace that, anyway. The money should be used for improvements, not maintenance he said. Peter Geary said that the money does not have to be spent just on play areas. It could be used on any open spaces, he said, and he also warned against spending it all in one go as there would not be any further Section 106 income for a long time. Tony Evans suggested getting input from the parents of children who use the play areas, as happened some years ago when some of the equipment on the recreation ground was replaced.

Odds and sods
A letter has been received from a young resident of Lavendon asking the council to provide a cycle path between Lavendon and Olney.


Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for October 2013

Public Participation
Brian Rice Brian Rice, the only speaker in this slot, had come to discuss parking in and around Oakdown Crescent. He reported that the previous Friday evening, a large van had parked on a corner in the Crescent in such a way as to make it hard to drive cars, let alone emergency vehicles, round it. Noting that the Crescent was full of cars most evenings, he said that the parking issue needed to be addressed within the next 12 months.

Colts changing rooms
Olney Town Colts Football Club (FC) has raised sufficient funds to build changing rooms, and contacted Olney Town Council (OTC) to discuss where they would be best located. After discussion, the Recreations and Services Committee recommended they be placed in an extension to the left of the tractor shed, approximately symmetrical with the toilet blocks to its right. The Council approved this recommendation, with all in favour bar Ron Bull, who was against the location on principle, feeling that the Football Clubs should be located together. As background, Olney Town Colts FC has 23 teams covering the junior age range from U6 to U18, while Olney Town FC has various senior teams. The two clubs were due to meet on the same evening as this Council meeting.

Traffic regulation order
As reported in an earlier Mercury, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) has recently been considering various requests to restrict parking in parts of Olney. The proposals have been out for consultation and the results are now in. The double yellow lines on Spinney Hill Road opposite the School will, in fact, be retained. New double yellow lines will be painted on the North side of Spring Lane between the High Street and West Street, and at various West Street junctions between Dinglederry and Spring Lane.

Community Asset Transfer
Jeremy Rawlings reported that the Youth Centre had been added, to tranche seven of MKC’s Community Asset Transfer programme. He believed there were four or more parties interested in taking over the running of the Centre. Steve Clark noted that MKC still had the option to keep the Centre, being under no obligation to transfer it. Jeremy concluded the topic, by noting that two or more of the parties appeared to have ambitions to build on the field to the rear of the Centre, suspecting they were as yet unaware of the buried sewer pipe running East-West across the site to the pumping station behind, and the associated restriction that no building was allowed within four metres of its route.

Citizens Advice Bureau
As reported previously, the local Citizens Advice Outreach Service is supported financially by OTC, and had provided a report on its work between April 2012 and February 2013. It had seen 57 clients in that time, almost all from the Olney Ward, 34% aged 35-49, 26% aged 25-34 and 72% female. The biggest topics enquired about by its clients were benefits (43%) and debt (27%). It was noted that OTC had effectively paid approximately £100 per client, and that it would have been cheaper for it to pay for taxis to have those people seen in Milton Keynes, although that would not preserve their anonymity. John Boardman felt, and various Councillors agreed, that a representative from the Bureau should be invited to speak with the Council before the next anniversary of the funding, to allow Councillors to get a better picture of its operation.

Bits’n’bobs
Liam Costello noted that the allotment track is due for resurfacing in the next month or so. A site meeting has been held with the contractor, and tenants of nearby properties will be informed. Jeremy Rawlings had attended the opening night of the new Youth Café in the redeveloped Church Hall. Around 30 children came along, and Jeremy was impressed with both the Café and the Hall’s fresh new look. A new Café, La Cantina, has opened in Rose Court. It’s made use of the ‘pop up’ measures introduced by Eric Pickles to promote regeneration, where various kinds of retail outlet, including restaurants, can open for up to two years before gaining the usual planning consent – for example, change of use. However, it did not give the required 21 days’ notice to MKC Planners, who have since visited the Café and asked it to provide the information retrospectively. Steve Clark, also a member of OTC’s Planning Committee, noted that this area of planning was currently something of a minefield, with those setting up new businesses under these measures not necessarily aware of what permissions and licences they need to apply for. Next Meeting - 4th November The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th November in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for November 2013

Olney Colts FC changing rooms 
As reported last month, Olney Town Colts Football Club has raised sufficient funds to build changing rooms, so they are no longer reliant on the facilities of Olney Town FC. The Recreations and Services Committee of Olney Town Council (OTC) had recommended that it be built adjacent to the existing tractor shed and should reflect the style of the existing building. Following that meeting, the colts had engaged an architect to draw up some illustrative plans of the proposals, and he and Ian Stokes were present at the meeting to present these to the council. The building will contain two junior changing rooms, a kitchen, a changing room for match officials, showers and an over-flow changing room that could double as a function room. The entire building will be disabled friendly, said Ian. The plans met with general approval of the council and, having already agreed in principle to the proposals, agreed that The Colts could now proceed to the next stage of producing detailed plans and apply for planning permission. Deidre Bethune asked if the issue of the blocked sewer, which the building would connect to, had been resolved. For information the sewer, which serves all of the clubs and the public toilets on the recreation ground, runs along the boundary of the football pitch but diverts under the fence and private properties before joining with the main sewer in East Street. It is partially blocked by tree roots under the private properties and occasionally backs up and overflows during periods of exceptional use. Jeremy Rawlings explained that the blocked section was the responsibility of Anglian Water, who have admitted responsibility but prefers to reactively respond to blockages on each occasion and will only consider remedial work when it becomes financially advantageous to do so. 

Berrells Court resurfacing and drainage
The extremely poor condition of Berrells Court, off East Street, has long been a cause of concern with huge areas of standing water often covering much of the surface. It has never been adopted by Milton Keynes Council (MKC), and according to the Land Registry it does not have an owner. Planning Permission for a new property was granted almost two years ago, and a condition of this Permission was that the road surface should be brought up to standard with tarmac and drainage before construction could start. When OTC last discussed the matter in December 201 2, the proposal was to bring the surface up to adoption standard and seek adoption. The council has since obtained quotes for a tarmac surface with five soakaways but the fact that the soakaways would be directly under the road does not meet the standard for adoption. Town Clerk Liam Costello has contacted the residents of Berrells Court with a view to getting them to contribute to the costs and all but one or two had agreed. Joe Stacey questioned whether the specification needed to be so high for a residential road that gets very little use, particularly now that adoption is not being proposed. Liam agreed to seek alternative quotes for a lower spec. Ben Brock and Deidre Bethune wondered if residents who contributed to the work would be able to claim ownership once it was done. (For a wonderful moment Mercury had a vision of them installing a toll booth and charging the recalcitrant few for access to their properties!) Jeremy Rawlings expressed his displeasure with the whole proposal, declaring it 'a farce'. 

Landscaping Services
As previously reported, MKC has recently approved a procurement process to test the market in terms of both cost and service standards, as part of a 'value for money' review of the landscape services, that include grass cutting, shrub, hedge and tree maintenance and weed control. OTC has been asked whether it wishes MKC to retain responsibility for the services, which would be put out to tender, or take responsibility for the services themselves. A working party of Cllrs Evans, Geary, Boardman, Bull and Clark were appointed to look at the pros and cons of each option and have produced a detailed report which recommends that OTC take on the devolved service in house for an initial three year period, employing a part-time worker and leasing any additional equipment required. At the end of the three-year period, OTC can chose to hand the service back to MKC if it does not prove successful. The recommendation was put to a vote and passed unanimously. 

Neighbourhood Plan
The Localism Act introduced a right for communities to draw up 'Neighbourhood Plans' that can become part of the formal planning framework for the area. Once adopted, these Neighbourhood Plans form part of the statutory Development Plan for the area and give the local community more say and control over development in the area. They cannot be used to counteract or override existing core strategies but are more to provide a local input to the implementation of those strategies. At a previous meeting, Joe Stacey had strongly urged OTC to produce such a plan and had agreed to be part of a working group to investigate the feasibility. Joe had consulted members of other communities that had produced plans, including Stony Stratford, Woburn Sands and Winslow, and noted that some had obtained significant funding and produced large documents, whereas others had produced smaller documents in house at little or no cost. The working party had recommended that OTC allocate a budget of £7,000 for a Steering Group, consisting of five Town Councillors and four selected representatives of the community, to produce a Neighbourhood Plan for the parish of Olney. A vote was taken to proceed with the recommendation, which was passed unanimously.  A point of interest: The Working Party report refers to the MKC Core Strategy, which states that collectively Newport Pagnell, Olney and Woburn Sands are earmarked for an additional 1760 new homes over the next few years. These three settlements were chosen on the basis that they have the largest range of facilities and best public transport links in the rural area. All, bar Olney, have already embarked on producing Neighbourhood Plans, and based on historical growth patterns Olney would be expected to grow by approximately 250 properties in that time. As Olney has been identified as a key settlement, numerous landowners have put forward parcels of land to be considered for housing development. The suggested sites will now be examined in detail to see how sustainable they are, e.g. in terms of proximity of main services such as water, electricity and sewage and also how they would link in to the current highway network. One or more of the sites will then be included in the development plan as being suitable. To this end, most (if not all) of the landowners to the west of Aspreys have put forward plots of land to be considered, and the land thus far put forward is sufficient to build over 2000 dwelling, although this does not guarantee that they will be deemed acceptable and included in the development plan. The action of the landowners is not surprising bearing in mind the considerable increase in the value of green belt agricultural land that such designation would confer. Of course, any development at the Weston Road end of Aspreys would further accelerate the gradual sprawl of Olney towards Weston Underwood. Mercury is grateful to Steve Clark for clarification of the Milton Keynes Development Strategy.

Kitchener Centre
Earlier this year the council had discussed a possible extension to the Kitchen Centre, due to an increase in the need for day care for the elderly. Dr Brian Partridge and Centre Manager Helena Newbould, had attended to support the proposal, and explained that there were then two waiting lists in operation: The first for people wishing to join the service, and at the time there were nine on the list with another six in progress. The second list was for people who already used the centre but wanted additional sessions and that then stood at 12. Since then, the incumbent operator has lost the contract for running the centre and it has been bought in house by MKC. For some reason which was not made clear, there is no longer any waiting list and consequently no business justification for expansion. Debbie Brock, Cabinet Member of MKC with Portfolio responsibility for Adult, Older Years and Health, said that opportunities for additional services that do not involve expansion of the building were being explored.

Parish Wardens
Parish Wardens are employed by MKC and spend on average half a day per week in their allocated parish, performing duties such as enforcing dog fouling fines, supporting the police and PCSOs etc. Earlier this year MKC had informed OTC that it was proposing to 'delete' the six remaining warden posts, only four of which were then occupied, unless the parishes provided funding for them to continue. At the time, OTC requested a breakdown of what the wardens had contributed to Olney over the past few months, before deciding what to do. 23 other parishes had done likewise, and only three had expressed an interest in purchasing the services of the wardens so MKC has decided to end the service from 31 st March 2014. 

Odds and sods
Tony Evans reported that a vacancy has arisen at the Ann Hopkins Smith Almshouses and applications are invited from ladies of the parish who are over 60 of age in need of accommodation.  Deidre Bethune reported that the organisers of the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) would like to extend the event to cover the whole weekend of 6th & 7th of September next year. They currently have no clear plans for the Sunday but suggested it could encompass the Farmers' Market and other events. Steve Clark suggested a meeting between reps from BOFF, the Farmers' Market and OTC Rees and Services committee.  Debbie Brock passed on her thanks to The Olney Group (TOG) for another highly successful fireworks display.  Next Meeting - 2nd December The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd December in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 


Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for December 2013

Public Participation
Paul Collins, Chair of Trustees at the Cowper and Newton Museum, was the only member of the public to speak in this slot. After a recent unintended schedule clash between two musical events in the town, he urged the Council to consider implementing a central calendar for town events which local organisations would be free to use, thus reducing the possibility of such schedule related surprises in future. 

Olney Dementia Project
The Council listened to a presentation from Joy Oehlman on the Olney Dementia Project, organised by the Friends of Cobbs Garden Surgery and made possible through generous donations from local businesses. It's in response to David Cameron's Dementia Challenge, and Joy is employed on a fixed term one year contract. Olney has a higher than average proportion of older people and, nationally, increases in dementia detection rates (currently 44%) are expected to significantly boost the proportion diagnosed with dementia.  Two thirds of those diagnosed with dementia live in the community , with many of them feeling let down and misunderstood by those around them. The Project aims to increase awareness and understanding of dementia, trying to address issues such as shopping - dementia sufferers tend to feel more comfortable shopping locally - and signage. While not the first initiative in the UK, that honour falling to York, it is the first in Milton Keynes borough. 

Big Olney Food Festival 2014
Following on from last month, the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) has now formally asked the Council if it can extend its September 2014 event to two days. Sunday, the second day, would see the Farmers' Market stalls housed under BOFF's covered area, encouraged to serve hot food and to stay at the venue late into the afternoon. The Council agreed to this request.

Proposed Road Changes
Although only mentioned briefly in this meeting, two proposed road changes have entered their consultation period -the High Street junctions with Yardley and Weston Roads. If you visited the Council's stall at Dickens of a Christmas, you'd have seen their details on display.

Hearing Loop System
As reported previously, the Council has been trying to install an improved hearing loop system in the Olney Centre. This has been progressing very slowly, with an external company having agreed to install a trial system but not yet having done so. In order to guarantee some progress, Councillors voted that, if the trial system was not ready by the January full Council meeting, Jeremy Rawlings would investigate the purchase of one or two boundary microphones and equipment to connect them to the existing hearing loop, thus hopefully providing a useful fixed system for the Council Chamber. 

East Street Parking
Parking near the Sports fields at certain times during weekends continues to be a hot issue. Various possible solutions were discussed, and those which seemed most relevant are noted here. Firstly, the Rugby Club has offered an area in the West end of Doffs Field which could be used at weekends for sports related parking. Secondly, Tony Evans suggested the compulsory purchase of the vacant land North of and adjacent to the existing East Street car park, and currently classified as being for housing use. Peter Geary felt that the parking problem was a neighbourhood planning issue, that there was a logical process to pass through and that, since it was a problem for only around four hours per week, there may be easier solutions such as traffic management. He also noted that, with its housing classification, this vacant parcel of land was extremely valuable and, to purchase it, the Council would likely need to request that another piece of land be classified as being for housing use. If this was done, then the money from the sale could be used to fund the purchase of the land adjacent to the car park. Tony Evans felt that having decided to reclassify this land as being for housing use, thus significantly inflating its value, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) should fund the land purchase. The only thing which seemed certain at the end of the discussion, was that this issue will run and run. 

Traffic Management Training 
Since the Police are generally no longer providing assistance with closing roads for local events, two three-hour training courses are being run in December, which will qualify those who complete them to be able to close roads with speed limits of 30MPH and below. They'll be attended by representatives from various local groups, and from the Council. 

Rugby News
Duncan Taylor, previously a junior player at Olney Rugby Club, graduated to playing with Bedford Blues, now plays for Saracens and has six caps for Scotland. Councillors congratulated this major achievement.  Next Meeting - 6th January 2014 The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th January in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
-----
 
Mercury's reports for 2014


Olney Council report for January 2014

Public Participation
Mrs Holsten Local resident Mrs Holsten was the only member of the public to speak in this slot. Mrs Holsten said that she had lived in Olney for all of her 80 years and said that in years gone by there had been a public footpath to the left of ‘The Goosey’ where she had played as a child, but in recent years the sign had been taken down. Mayor Steve Clark said the current map does not show the existence of an official path. Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that if it was not on the current map then in is not an official path. He said he would look at the 1929 map to see if was shown on there and if it can be proved that the public have had unrestricted access for at least 20 years it can be reinstated.

Erection of 33 properties off Warrington Road
The council had been asked to consider what Section 106 contributions should be requested in case this application should be approved. Planning obligations under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, commonly known as Section 106 agreements, are often referred to as ‘developer contributions’ and are a mechanism which make a development proposal acceptable in planning terms, that would not otherwise be acceptable. The contribution for this site is expected to be £467k. Olney Town Council has already formally objected to this development which is along the path of the old railway line, behind the Stilebrook Road industrial estate. Some years ago this land was designated for B1 (office) development and permission granted for the erection of 23 units. However, only six of these units have ever been built and the developer now wishes to convert it to C3 (residential) use. The council have objected on the basis that the site:

  • Is a departure from the adopted plan and is outside the town development boundary
  • Is incompatible with the existing land use
  • Is disconnected from the rest of the residential development in the town
  • Will be accessed via the existing office development
  • Has poor access onto Warrington Road towards the town centre
  • Was a speculative development by the developer and just because it has turned out not to be financially viable for commercial use this is not justification for a fragmented housing development
  • May be required for future employment building for Olney to develop as a sustainable town
  • It was also noted that the site will back on to the unattended sewage works and when the sludge is collected the stench can last for several days. This will inevitably lead to complaints from the residents, thought councillors. Jeremy Rawlings will attend the next MKC Planning meeting to reiterate OTC’s objection to the plans and recommend a site visit so that officers can see how isolated it is. Returning to the matter of the matter of the S106 contribution, Ron Bull noted that the site would be dangerous to access for pedestrians, particularly students attending the Ousedale Campus and wondered if the contribution should be used for safer access. Peter Geary said that this would be the responsibility of the developer under Section 278. It was important that the S106 contribution does not go into the MK pot but should benefit Olney, he said. He proposed that the recommendation should be for £138k to go towards education, £6k towards allotments and burials and the rest be ring-fenced for social infrastructure. A vote was taken and Steve Clark declared it unanimous, but from where Mercury was sitting some members appeared not to vote for, against or abstain. Perhaps they couldn’t make up their minds?

    Access to land at rear of 61 Moores Hill
    Councillors Peter Geary, Debbie Brock and Ben Brock left the meeting at this point. The issue of development in the large rear gardens of the houses in Moore’s Hill has been a subject of considerable debate, controversy and accusations in recent years and Mercury does not intend to go over old ground here. In March 2012 OTC were made aware of MKC’s intention to grant an easement of access over a strip of land in Dinglederry at the rear of 59 Moores Hill to facilitate development on land at the rear of number 61. OTC expressed their concerns at the time so the matter did not proceed, although it ‘remained on the table’. The applicant now wishes to proceed and OTC will once again object. Tony Evans observed that this will probably be followed by another, and then another until access is eventually available for the single house and garden which remains in the ownership of MKC.

    Neighbourhood Action Group (NAG)
    A resident has asked, via the Olney Noticeboard Facebook page, if the minutes of NAG meetings could be made public. Mercury understands that this is in connection with the recent spate of burglaries just before Christmas, although the NAG website states that their three top priorities are 1. Traffic, 2. Parking and 3. Dog Fouling. Steve Clark said that under Thames Valley Police rules put in place when the NAGs were created, all minutes must be published.

    Cattle Market car park
    Although the Market Place car park is owned and controlled by OTC, the old Cattle Market car park, beyond Punch Opticians, remains in the ownership of MKC. OTC has discussed applying for ownership under the Community Asset Transfer scheme in the past but it has not been progressed. Peter Geary reminded members that if they want to proceed with this they need to start things moving soon, as the window of opportunity may not be open forever. It was agreed that this should be an agenda item next month.

    Traffic management training
    As reported last month, the Police are generally no longer providing assistance with closing roads for local events and two-three hour training courses were run in December, which qualified those who completed them to be able to close roads with speed limits of 30mph and below. Jeremy Rawlings reported that he had attended one and declared it ‘a complete waste of time’. 

    Rugby posts at Johnsons Field
    Clerk Liam Costello reported that the posts had that day been erected on Johnsons Field as part of the Rugby Football Union’s Posts in the Park initiative. The information on the OTC website states:  ‘Across England the build-up to Rugby World Cup 2015 has begun with the Rugby Football Union’s Posts in the Park initiative. Under this programme up to 100 posts will be installed in the 10 English RWC 2015 host cities.  Aimed at broadening the appeal of the Game and reaching out to new audiences, Posts in the Park launched nationwide on the 18 September 2013, and has already inspired youngsters from all walks of life to get down to their local park and try their hand at rugby.  Over the coming months Milton Keynes Sports Development team will be running activities aimed at getting more people interested in the sport.’

    Events Diary
    In responses to a number of requests from residents, OTC has created a diary of local events on its webpage. Organisers of any events are asked to contact the council office on (01234) 711679 or email TownClerk@OlneyTownCouncil.gov.uk to get them published. The diary can be viewed at www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk on the Events tab. Next Meeting - 3rd February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for February 2014

    Public Participation
    Ian Stokes was the only member of the public to speak in this slot. He was concerned about the Pelican Crossing on the A509 near Midland Road, noting that many times he’d seen cars cross the lights at red. He felt this was due to a combination of inattention and plain not wanting to stop, and that, especially since the crossing is used by School children and elderly people, the problem needed attention. Debbie Brock said she’d highlight the issue with Milton Keynes Council (MKC).

    Neighbourhood planning
    Joe Stacey reported that the current status of MKC’s housing requirements for the borough’s rural areas is that 326 additional houses are required. While that’s considerably less than its previous figure of 1760, he noted that Woburn Sands had indicated it would like no further houses, having already taken significant numbers.

    Dickens of a Christmas
    Jeremy Rawlings gave a brief update on what was a successful Dickens of a Christmas Day. The weather on the day was very good, and it was generally thought to be one of the best since the event’s inception.

    Finance Committee
    Deidre Bethune explained that the Council’s accounts had been internally audited and received a glowing report. She then noted a couple more points from the Committee’s last meeting. The Committee had recommended that the Council take out its insurance with AON, which came in considerably cheaper than competing quotes, and this was agreed by full Council. The Committee had considered a three year draft budget and precept for the accounting period 2014 – 2017. It had voted to approve this budget, which will set the precept for the first year at £166,000, a 2.67% increase on the previous year. It would then rise by 1.2% for each of the following two years. Peter Geary felt that planning a three year budget was proving a useful exercise, helping the Council take a long term view of its finances. He also asked Deidre if the budget took into account the planned reductions in Government funding over the next few years. She confirmed it did, meaning that, in spite of the rise in precept, the Council’s overall income would barely rise at all.

    MKC budget consultation
    MKC had drawn up a detailed consultation document on its budget for 2014-2015 and sent it to its local Councils for review. Olney Town Council (OTC) discussed it at this meeting. Various Councillors felt that the document was so long and detailed that it made it hard to find the parts on which it’d be useful to comment. Peter Geary explained that the detail had been provided in order to allow Councils to see exactly the information they needed, rather than risking hiding information by, for example, gathering too many figures together under one total or summarising too heavily. Jeremy Rawlings noted that, like many other Councils, it was likely that MKC would in the coming years stop its Youth Services budget. As Chair of Olney Youth Centre, Jeremy felt it’d be beneficial for this budget to continue. Councillors agreed that OTC’s feedback would be that Youth Services should be retained, that some of the previously cut bus services should be reinstated, and that it did not wish to see a reduction in library opening hours.

    Community Asset Transfer (CAT)
    OTC had asked MKC whether it would be possible for the Cattle Market and Fountain Court car parks to be transferred to OTC under the CAT program. MKC had replied in the negative – that it would retain these car parks. From the comments of some Councillors, it wasn’t completely clear why the question had been asked in the first place.

    Olney Town Colts FC
    As reported before, Olney Town Colts FC is moving towards obtaining planning permission to build changing rooms in an extension to the left of the tractor shed, approximately symmetrical with the toilet blocks to its right. Councillors were broadly in favour of this development, noting a few issues. Deidre Bethune questioned whether sufficient space would remain available for the Council’s tractors and other machinery. Tony Evans confirmed that it would. Peter Geary, aware of ongoing occasional problems with the sewage drainage from the building, asked if the existing drainage capacity was sufficient. Tony felt it probably was not, and that the Council should request plans for both surface and foul water drainage. Tony noted the need to end up with a machinery compound as safe as the current one and with suitable access, without any cost to OTC. Finally it’s likely that, once planning permission is obtained, the land will be passed to the Colts on a long term lease for a peppercorn rent, much as happens for other Clubs’ buildings.

    June events
    The Council gave permission for the Newport Pagnell & Olney Lions to hold Motorama on Sunday 8th June. Permission was also given for Booze on the Ouse to be held on Saturday 28th June, this year with the marquee located between the tennis and all weather courts, close to the Colts’ planned new building.

    Community transport
    MKC is consulting about how it should in future provide transport for those who are disabled or have difficulties using public transport, and had sent a consultation document to its local Councils to discover their views. The suggested options included on-demand shared taxis and various volunteer driver schemes. Debbie Brock noted that the existing service was creaking under the weight of demand and not able to fulfil expectations. The Council will feed back its wish that any changes should not result in Olney suffering a reduction in this service.

    Wicker runners
    Two wicker pancake race runners have been ordered and will shortly be installed in one of the Market Square flower beds. Next Meeting - 3rd March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for March 2014

    Public Participation
    Andrew Harris The only member of the public to speak at this month’s meeting was Andrew Harris of Olney Brass, in support of a funding application which had recently been submitted. Andrew explained that the band is a registered charity that charges adult members £180 a year but is free to under 18s. The band had raised its profile in the last 12 months he said, having given a number of public performances and taken part in competitions. They had also become more financially prudent, but there are number of costs to be met, particularly with respect to running the junior band. Last year they had received a grant from Olney Town Council (OTC) of £2500 but controlling costs meant that they would only need to apply for a £1250 grant for the coming year. 

    Goosey Fields footpath
    At the January meeting local resident Mrs Holsten had asked about the sign identifying a footpath across the Goosey Field which had been removed at some time in the past. The path is not marked on any current maps but the council agreed to look at the 1929 map to see if it was shown on there. John Smail said he recalled that a stile used to exist over the fence on the right hand side before the bridge and the path ran across the field parallel to Weston Road, but it is now blocked and overgrown. Milton Keynes (MKC) ward councillor Peter Geary said that unless there was evidence that the path had been accessed within the last 20 years then the right of way would have lapsed and in order for it to be reinstated the council would need to make a Definitive Map Modification Order. It was agreed not to proceed with such an application.

    Parking restrictions
    Debbie Brock reported that she had had an email from a resident of Timpsons Row complaining of a number of ‘near miss’ traffic accidents caused by inconsiderate parking at the Coneygere junctions with Palmers Row and Church Street and also at the junction of the one-way system in East Street. The resident had requested that consideration be given to providing double yellow lines at these junctions. John Boardman thought that this was further evidence of a growing trend of inconsiderate parking in the town and Ron Bull agreed, but didn’t think that the Coneygere junctions were particularly bad. He agreed that East Street visibility could be a problem, but didn’t think it warranted double yellow lines. Deidre Bethune was of the opinion that parking in the whole Coneygere/Timpsons Row area needed addressing, saying that she had received complaints from the allotment holders. Joe Stacey observed that Church Street was effectively a single track road for much of the time, due to cars parked on both sides. Jeremy Rawlings said that double yellow lines were not always the best solution as they simply moved the problem elsewhere. Peter Geary said the council must consider if there is an issue that needs addressing and if so it should go through the correct process. Joe Stacey proposed that the council should not take any action and the proposal was passed by a majority. While sympathetic to the problem, the general feeling seemed to be that the resident could take up the issue directly with MKC if they felt so minded.

    Thursday Market stall charges
    Town Clerk Liam Costello reported that he had received a complaint from the Market Traders’ Association about the recent 5% rise in charges. John Sharp said he thought that 5% was a large increase. There had been seven traders give up their pitch recently, he said, although it was pointed that some of those had been before the rise was announced. Peter Geary reminded members that the rise had been approved by the council as part of the annual budget. Deidre Bethune felt that in future the charges should go up by a small amount each year rather than have occasional, but larger, increases. Debbie Brock wondered how Olney prices compared with other local markets. An important part of being a market town was that we should have a market, she said, so it should be supported.

    Veterans’ Day
    The Town Council will once again be running this very popular event. The date this year will be Friday 27th June and will take place in the Carlton House Club. Next Meeting - 7th April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for April 2014

    Public Participation
    Lesley Viney Lesley Viney was first to speak in this slot, looking at the recent bus service changes from the perspective of Olney youngsters travelling to and from Milton Keynes. Residents under 19 in the MK Borough can apply for an All In One card, which allows them to travel on pretty much any MK bus for 45p. Some of the service changes have resulted in two separate journeys being required when previously only one was needed - this doubles the price. A example is the journey between Olney and Bletchley. Debbie Brock said she’d be happy to follow this up. Mike Totton Mike Totton of the Olney Allotment Holders Association (OAHA) was last to speak. Starting by criticising communication with Olney Town Council (OTC) as ‘ineffectual and inefficient’, Mike then reached the nub of the matter – that the Council has raised allotment rents from £2 to £3 per pole, an increase of 50%. He felt this was unfair and also, having taken legal advice, illegal. He felt the decision had been taken without discussion with the OAHA Committee, representing a break in the agreement with the Chair of the Recreations and Services Committee. He asked that the Council reconsider its decision and concluded by saying that, if it did not, the OAHA Committee would recommend its members not pay the increase. Tony Evans Tony Evans replied briefly, stating that OTC had done its homework and Olney allotment rents were at the bottom of the scale compared to other local councils in the area. For example, Bletchley and Fenny Stratford Parish Council charged £10 per pole. Far from satisfied with this response, Mike and his supporters left the Council Chamber.

    Allotment Rents
    A Council meeting is driven by an agenda circulated a few days before. As the allotment rent issue had only just come to the fore, it wasn’t on the agenda and, therefore, couldn’t be discussed in detail. However, it was covered very briefly. In summary, Tony Evans appeared genuinely surprised at what Mike Totton had said. He had felt unprepared to respond, and that the way in which he and the Council had handled the situation immediately after Mike’s speech had not been ideal. Peter Geary felt the allotment holders should discuss the issue with full Council. A pole is a traditional agricultural measure of area, equivalent to around 25 square metres. There’s significant variation in the yearly pole rent charged around Milton Keynes Borough. From 2014 – 2015, Emberton Parish Council is charging £2.75, Olney £3, Campbell Park £5 and Bletchley and Fenny Stratford £10 – £12. Looking at what the increase means to allotment holders, an average sized Olney allotment is five poles in area, so the rent has increased from £10 to £15 per year. As John Boardman noted, it’s the 50%, rather than the £5 increase, which appears to be the issue.

    Neighbourhood Planning
    Joe Stacey reported that land agents Bidwells are representing the owners of various fields West and North West of Aspreys. As part of the Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Local Planning process, Olney will be expected to take in the region of a 250 additional houses over the period to 2031. Through the Neighbourhood Planning process, OTC will be looking to identify where that additional housing could go. Bidwells would like the site comprising the two fields adjacent to Yardley Road, just North West of Aspreys, to be allocated for development, as it could accommodate all 250 future homes. Bidwells is looking to have the site allocated as the location for housing growth, then plan to sell the land to a developer.

    Community Asset Transfer (CAT)
    Back in June 2013, and after various debates about the current ownership of the Olney Centre, OTC voted for the building’s ownership to be transferred from MKC to OTC (under the CAT programme). Alan Richardson reported that this transfer had moved significantly closer to fruition. After the transfer, the library would become a tenant of OTC. Following negotiations, OTC had agreed a rental figure with the library and, at a later meeting, expected it to be finalised. Alan hoped, at the next full Council meeting, to be able to report that (subject to legal agreement) OTC would be the new owner of the Olney Centre. Tony Evans and other councillors thanked Alan for his hard work on this task.

    High Street Parking
    Deidre Bethune raised the issue of poor parking on the High Street. In essence, she felt OTC should consider marking out parking bays in order to make drivers park more uniformly, thus making better use of the space available. Debbie Brock (noting that it seemed like Groundhog Day) said that this issue had been included in the traffic review, but the Council had done nothing about it. She also explained that painting lines may introduce a legal hurdle, by giving tacit approval to drivers reversing out into the road. That this issue keeps arising, but has not been addressed, implies that High Street parking is a real problem, but it’s hard to solve. Joe Stacey said the issue was noted in the Neighbourhood Plan, to be surveyed in the summer. No obvious conclusion was reached in this meeting.

    High Street Traffic Speed
    Recently, the Council received an email expressing concern that a high proportion of the vehicles travelling along the High Street appeared to be exceeding the 30mph speed limit. It cited a clear link between Santa Pod events and speeding vehicles, noting that, while speed checks were often performed on the A509 outside Olney, they were not performed on the stretch in the town. Deidre Bethune was not convinced there was a problem to solve. Speed checks have been performed and, in general, speeding on the High Street was not an issue. Councillors briefly discussed having a 20mph limit but, as Peter Geary noted, the A509 is a trunk road. Various groups, such as the Highways Agency and the Freight Transport Association, would likely oppose it. He suggested installing speed detector tubes or a Speed Indicator Device (SID) on the High Street to gather evidence.

    Olney Rugby Club Extension
    The rugby club has submitted plans, prior to formally applying for permission, for a small extension to its entrance area.

    Defibrillator
    A defibrillator has been installed at the recreation ground, and operation training will be given on Tuesday 13th May. To ensure it’s only used in emergencies, a potential user must dial 999, give the unit’s location and, in exchange, will be given a code to unlock it.

    Market Place Parking
    Liam Costello reported that eight penalty tickets for Market Place parking violations were issued in January and nine in February, The figures for both months are close to the average.

    Summer Fun
    The Council gave permission for the fun fair to visit the Olney recreation ground from June 18th to the 21st, the Cherry Fair will be held on Saturday, June 28th and the Duck and Raft Races will be (provisionally) held on Sunday, July 6th.

    Sewer
    Alan Richardson reported that the sewer which serves the football club, bowls club and toilet block has continued to cause problems. The route immediately starts South of the Football Club and runs West beneath the grass, alongside the roadway. About halfway to East Street, it then turns South under the roadway, under a fence and into a privately owned residential property. The Council is responsible for the length of six inch diameter pipe under the recreation ground, while Anglian Water becomes responsible as it passes under the fence and into private property. The roots of the private property’s willow tree have forced their way into the sewer, and this is believed to be responsible for much of the problem. Anglian Water are undertaking a site visit, and bringing a camera to feed along the pipe to allow the extent of the problem to be seen. The problem isn’t new and, as Tony Evans noted, will probably take a few years to solve. Alan stated that the bowls club had recently installed a macerator, something the Colts will be required to do in the new building. In engineering terms, the ideal solution would be to run a new pipe from the football club, heading West, deep beneath the grass alongside the roadway to the main sewer under East Street. However, the position of that sewer, 5.4 metres below the middle of the road, makes this a difficult task to achieve.

    Weston Road Play Area
    The issue of land slippage in the Weston Road play area continues. Debbie Brock reported that it will be addressed as part of a larger plan to rework the area, making it more sensitive to the environment.

    Town Meeting
    The annual town meeting will be held at the Olney Centre on Thursday May 8th, starting at 7pm. Members of the public are welcome to attend. It’s your opportunity to have your say, and find out how Olney works. Next Meeting - 12th May The following meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday, May 12th, in the Council Chamber at the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point the mayor decides it is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for May 2014

    Public Participation
    Lawrence McCartney There were two members of the public wishing to speak at this month’s meeting. The first was Cherry Orchard resident Lawrence McCartney, who wished to speak about a traffic issue. He said that there is a footpath at the top of Cherry Orchard that is used by children walking to school, and recently he had noticed an increase in speeding cars driving across the footpath as a short-cut to Sillswood. He asked what Olney Town Council (OTC) could do about it. Mayor Steve Clark explained that it could not be discussed at this meeting as it was not a formal agenda item, but the council would investigate and create an agenda item at a future meeting, if appropriate. Susan Hughes The next person to speak was Susan Hughes on behalf of Olney Neighbourhood Action Group (NAG). Susan said the NAG had noted that OTC was considering placing CCTV cameras in the Market Place and said that funding could possibly be made available if it were considered as a NAG initiative. As this was already an agenda item for this meeting, The mayor agreed that the item could be brought forward in the running order for Susan to participate in the discussion.

    Election of Mayor and Deputy
    Steve Clark indicated his willingness to stand for another year as Mayor and, as there were no other candidates, was duly elected on a vote. Deputy Mayor Jeremy Rawlings said he was happy to stand for another year and was also re-elected.

    CCTV on Market Place
    The mayor said that this matter had been the subject of some considerable debate at the previous week’s annual Town Meeting. Local police officer Andy Perry had suggested that cameras could be erected and linked to the police control room at MK police station, where they would be continually monitored so officers could be dispatched to incidents. Where it was not possible to get an officer to the scene in time, the pictures would be of sufficient quality to be used as evidence, he said. The images are normally retained for a minimum of 28 days, as members of the public have the right to request any CCTV pictures that they suspect may exist of themselves in that time. 
    Debbie Brock recognised that some people might be uncomfortable with the idea of placing cameras but said there were “powerful factors” in favour of it. She said it was also important that the equipment should be sympathetic to the area.
     
    Deidre Bethune said careful consideration would need to be given to the number of cameras and the area of coverage. It was important to understand the cost, she felt, as PC Perry had indicated it might be expensive. For information, he explained that the majority of cameras in other locations were linked to the central monitoring room via relatively cheap microwave links, but because of the hill between Olney and MK it would need to be connected via more expensive fibre link. 
    J
    ohn Boardman asked what recent incident had occurred that the cameras might prevent or assist in identifying the culprits. The specific incidents that members could recall were the very recent arson attack on the wicker pancake figure, a ram-raid on McColls, burglaries to shops around the Market Place and damage to the door of the public toilets. The mayor said the council needed to decide if it wished to progress with the scheme without committing if the cost turned out to be prohibitively expensive. It would then be necessary to look at funding options, he said. 
    Ben Brock wondered if it would be worth approaching the businesses around the Market Place to see if they would contribute to the funding. Tony Evans said that when cameras had been installed in the East Street (rugby club) car park the effect had been immediate and dramatic. No prosecution had been necessary because the antisocial behaviour had ceased. He supported the proposal, saying that many people felt intimidated by the large groups that congregated on the Market Square, although there was no suggestion that they might be involved in any criminal activity. The council agreed to continue the investigation.

    unknown
    A Van at Emberton Park


    Councillor Colin Rodden leave of absence
    Under Section 85 of the Local Government Act, any councillor who does not attend meetings for a period of six months automatically ceases to be a member of the council unless granted a leave of absence. Colin Rodden is current working abroad and, although due to return to the UK in May, has found it necessary to delay his return until July and has thus requested a leave of absence. One of the factors to be considered when granting such a request is whether the individual is able to continue performing ward functions by phone or email, and in his letter of request Colin explained that he had been doing just that. Whist agreeing that Colin was still actively engaged in council business, Tony Evans said he was not comfortable with council business being conducted by email. Discussion should take place in open meetings, he felt. The council agreed by a majority to permit the leave of absence. 

    DOFF’s Field parking
    Olney has some funding available from MKC for a community parking scheme, which was intended to go towards providing a parking area at the top of the recreation ground and additional spaces in the East Street car park. Instead, the council have been considering an alternative plan to allow limited parking on Doff’s Field, owned by the rugby club. However, this would mean applying for a variation of the planning permission originally granted for use of the field. To that end, OTC had approached MKC for pre-application advice on providing access via Austen Avenue.  A response had been received from a planning officer saying that, having discussed the matter with the Senior Highways Engineer, there was not sufficient justification to apply for a variation and they would not support such an application, due to the disruption it could cause to residents of Austin Avenue and Carey Way. If OTC wished to proceed with the application it would need to submit substantial background information relating to the parking problems in the area that had led to the application. 
    Jeremy Rawlings said it was clear that this officer had no idea of the situation and had ignored a request from OTC, who fully understood the matter. 
    Tony Evans expressed his desperate disappointment that MKC had adopted such a standpoint and suggested that OTC and the rugby club now get together to submit the application. 
    John Sharp reminded members that it was MKC that had ordered that Crouch’s Field must not be used for organised sport until the parking situation was resolved, and now they were rejecting a parking proposal which would contribute to that resolution.
    John Boardman suggested that a meeting should be held with representatives from MKC to make them fully aware of the issue before progressing with the application, which was agreed.

    B.O.F.F. Indemnity
    Deidre Bethune presented a request, on behalf of the organisers of the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF), that the council consider indemnifying them in case of financial loss. A number of members were not happy with this.
     
    John Sharp was of the opinion that it was a commercially run event and pointed out that OTC does not charge the organisers for use of the Market Place. It does not indemnify the market traders on the Thursday market if they have a bad day, he said. 
    Debbie Brock emphasised her support for the event, saying it was a very good event for the town. She recalled that the council had provided indemnity previously but with the caveat it would not be on a permanent recurring basis. 
    John Boardman said he could not support the request and thought that the organisers should build up their own contingency fund. 
    Tony Evans asked if BOFF had presented its accounts to OTC, saying he would not be comfortable granting the application until he knew how much it had made last year, which was considered a success

    Ron Bull wondered in the event of a loss, who would cover it? And, if there was a profit, who would receive it? 
    Deidre replied that some of the profit goes to charity, some towards the cost of Dickens of a Christmas and some to building up a reserve. The council agreed that the event could now be extended to three days, but delayed a decision on the indemnity request, pending further information about finances.

    Allotment fee increase
    As reported last month, OTC has increased the rent it charges allotment holders from £2 to £3 per pole, an increase of 50%. An average-sized Olney allotment is five poles in area, so its rent has increased from £10 to £15 per year. Last month, a small delegation of the allotment holders had attended the OTC meeting and it had also been the subject of comments at the Town Meeting. 

    Tony Evans said that Olney had not increased its rents for several years and had now fallen behind most other councils.  Rosemary Osbourne said that one of the main concerns of the holders seemed to be that they were not consulted, but Tony Evans said the council was not obliged to consult and wouldn’t necessarily do so with other groups. He pointed out that it costs the council £5 per pole to administer the allotment so it was effectively losing £2 per pole. Only four holders out of 140 had attended last month’s meeting, he said, so there was no reason to believe that the majority were not content to accept the increase. 
    Ben Brock said he had not appreciated that the council actually made a loss on the allotments, and proposed that they increase the rental still further to at least cover costs. The proposal was not supported by any other member. The mayor proposed that the council increase the rent, as recommended by the Recreation and Services Committee, which was carried.

    Odds ‘n’ sods
    Debbie Brock reported that MKC had recently appointed Carole Mills as its new Chief Executive. Carole has held a number of roles in local government, most recently as Deputy Chief Executive and Corporate Director for Resources at Nottingham City Council. The Parish Remuneration Panel of MKC has increased the allowance payable to members of OTC from £742.23 to £750 a year. However, no member of OTC has ever claimed the allowance. Tony Evans said that he believed that councillors should give their time free of charge and would consider his position on the council if any members claimed the allowance. Steve Clark, reporting on behalf of Emberton Park Liaison Group, said that plans to transfer the leasehold of the park to the Parks Trust were ‘bubbling along in the background’. The park had recently been the venue for a celebration of the Sikh Festival of Vaisakhi, a harvest and a New Year celebration. The authorities were not made aware of the event and it was probably advertised by social media, he said. A lot of litter had been left, and there were reports of excessive noise and speeding, although one nearby resident claimed not to have heard a thing. Emberton resident Debbie Brock said it was great to see the park being used by such a diverse group of visitors.
    Steve Clark said comments had been made on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook page about the bad state of the Whirly Pit, and some residents were offering to clean it up themselves. Steve had suggested that they attend that night’s OTC meeting and present their case, but none had. The Whirly Pit is actually the responsibility of MKC, although Ron Bull said that a sign there referred to both OTC and MKC. 
    Debbie Brock said she would refer the matter to Andy Hudson, MKC Head of Environment and Waste. The fence and hard standing around the football pitch has now been completed, but it appears that it is not universally popular with residents. 
    Tony Evans wondered who would be responsible if it was damaged by the fair, for example. Would it be OTC, the football club or the Fair?  Next Meeting - 2nd June The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd June in the Council Chamber at the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 


    Olney Council report for June 2014

    Councillor vacancy
    At the recent elections, Debbie Brock stood down as Olney’s Ward Councillor for Milton Keynes Council (MKC). Therefore, she felt it appropriate to stand down from Olney Town Council (OTC) as well, so OTC started advertising a casual vacancy for a new councillor.  Members of the public could call for an election for the post and, if ten or more did that, an election would be held. This is highly unusual and, by the time you read this, OTC will probably be co-opting to fill the vacancy.

    Berrell’s Court
    As noted in earlier Mercury reports, quotes to resurface Berrell’s Court have been obtained, and the council is seeking financial contributions from interested parties. A planning application to erect a pair of two bedroom houses next to 8 Berrell’s Court has a condition attached to it. The roadway must be completed before construction of the dwellings is started.  The developer has asked for this condition to be varied to prevent damage from construction vehicles. As a result, the new road would be completed after the dwellings have been fully constructed but before they’re occupied. The intent behind the condition was likely to ensure that the developer makes the agreed contribution and that the road will be resurfaced. When speculating on the likely reason that a condition was thought necessary, consider the background behind the delay building Driftway.  After discussion, and some disagreement on the details, Peter Geary proposed that OTC ask the developer to pass his contribution to OTC. The council banked it and sent a letter supporting the variation to MKC. This should achieve the same aim, while preserving the new road surface. It was met with a general in favour consensus

    Bus shelter
    A member of the public has requested that a bus shelter be added to the existing bus stop adjacent to Brock’s Garage, on the East side of the High Street. Councillors did not generally seem convinced that this bus stop, or the one opposite, was well enough used to justify the expense. However, the issue will be added to the forthcoming review of the recently modified Yardley Road junction.

    East Street parking
    As reported before, MKC is not in favour of the proposal to add an additional car park at the West end of Doff’s Field. Liam had since asked for a meeting with MKC to discuss it, but their planning officer had rejected the request. There was some frustration, as the need for additional parking was real and clear. Peter Geary felt such reluctance to meet was normal, a meeting was required and the Ward Councillors would offer their support to help achieve it.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    The transfer of ownership of the Olney Centre to OTC, under the Community Asset Transfer scheme, is progressing. The Council Chamber hearing loop system, as temporarily provided by Jeremy Rawlings for last month’s meeting, proved successful, and Tony Evans thought it essential as a permanent fixture. The wicker lady from the Market Square has been sent off for repair and is expected to return in July.

    Pink sacks
    As reported in the local press, the availability of pink recycling sacks continues to be patchy. The mayor explained that Olney used to have three outlets – the Co-op, the library and the OTC office, with the latter piggybacking off the library’s supplies. Now, the only outlet is the Co-op and its supply is patchy. He asked if Olney’s Ward Councillors would support getting the supplies residents need. Peter Geary felt it was wrong that the library no longer had an outlet and said he’d follow up on this. He would also ask that supplies be delivered to OTC’s office.

    What emergency?
    Ron Bull reported that progress on preparing Olney’s Emergency Plan had stalled due to most of the three person committee being abroad or unavailable, due to work commitments. He stated that he didn’t want to continue on the committee without more help. This will be an agenda item at next month’s meeting.

    Table tennis
    An outdoor table tennis table, with free bats and balls, will be placed on the Recreation Ground near the children’s play area for a six week program. If the council want, it may be kept. The issue will be passed to the Recreations and Services Committee. Next Meeting - 7th July The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday, July 7, in the Council Chamber at the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for July 2014

    Public Participation
    Steve Axtell There were two members of the public wishing to speak at this month’s meeting. 
    Steve Axtell
     spoke on a matter that was a formal agenda item, so Mayor Steve Clark invited him to stay for that item and speak then.  Brian Rice The second was Brian Rice, who reminded the council that the parking problems in Weston Road and Oakdown Crescent had been going on for two and a half years now, and he felt it was time something was done.  He said the situation was getting worse and felt the proposed Sainsburys’ store would only make matters worse. Brian also said that the only solution put forward by the council so far was ‘laughable’ and it was time that they ‘pulled their fingers out’ and got it sorted. Deidre Bethune proposed that the issue was made a formal agenda item at the next meeting.

    Co-option of new a member
    As reported last month, there is a vacancy on Olney Town Council as Debbie Brock has resigned her seat. There had been no requests for an election from the public, so the post could be filled by co-option. 
    Mayor Steve Clark said that there were five candidates for the post, anyone of which he thought would make an excellent councillor.  The candidates were Chris ShawCassie KnightMalcolm MessengerBen Peters and Sally Pezaro. Each of them submitted a résumé and was invited to briefly address the council as to why they wished to be co-opted, except Ben Peters who was not present. 
    Town Clerk Liam Costello explained that the council’s Standing Orders had changed so the previous ‘first past the post’ method had been replaced by a requirement for the winning candidate to have an absolute majority. A ballot would be held and at each stage the candidate with the least votes would be struck off the list, until one candidate would be declared the winner.  In the first round, Ben Peters had the least votes so was struck off. In the second round, Malcolm Messenger and Cassie Knight tied, so it fell to the mayor to have the casting vote. Steve Clark said that as Malcolm Messenger had polled higher in the first round, it was only fair that he should progress to the next. In the next round, Chris Shaw gained an outright majority and was declared the winner and took his seat at the table. Chris has lived in or close to Olney for nearly 22 years and is currently part of the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group. He is a recently retired chartered surveyor with more than 40 years in the residential market. He is a trustee of Milton Keynes Parks Trust and Chair of Whitecap Ltd, a subsidiary of the trust, which is responsible for all leisure activities in and around Willen Lake. He is a trustee of Greensleeves Homes Trust and has been both Chair and Clerk to the Tyringham and Filgrave Parish meeting. He has played rugby for the Olney Rugby Club Vets.

    BOFF indemnity
    At a previous meeting, the council received a request to indemnify the Big Olney Food Festival against financial loss, but had voted not to do so. This month, Steve Axtell presented the request again and answered questions on behalf of the organising committee. He explained that BOFF is organised by the Olney Chamber of Trade with the objective of promoting food retailers and producers of the town and to bring visitors to the town. Over the past five years, it has grown in size and in cost, with the majority of revenue coming from business sponsors, fees charged to stall holders and bar sales.  He stressed that it is not a commercial event in the sense that the chamber does not make a profit. All income received is used to fund the event, with any surplus going to charities, Christmas trees and other events in the town. As the event is weather dependent, and there are no ticket sales, Steve requested that the council consider providing insurance indemnity against any losses. He said that last year’s event had made a profit of £3500, but this year it would run over two days and would incur additional costs. For that reason, the organisers were requesting cover of £5000. 
    John Boardman asked what funds the organisers currently had in the bank and Steve said he would provide it after the meeting. Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Councillor Peter Geary wondered what impact the £5000 would have on OTC’s budget if it should be called in, and Clerk Liam Costello replied that there was currently £16000 in the reserves. Peter then proposed that the council indemnify the event, which was passed by a vote of three for and two against. This means that the majority of members declined to vote for either.

    Draft Minerals Plan
    Peter Geary explained that the current plan proposes a new extraction site in Lavendon Parish, towards Cold Brayfield. It is a ‘dry site,’ so would not naturally fill with water during the extraction process. Therefore, it would need to be back-filled with inert material such as clay, soil and rubble. The rate of extraction would be 70-80 tonnes a year, which would be transported through Olney town centre and the continual backfilling process would effectively double the amount of lorries.  Peter expressed his surprise at the choice of this site, as the guidance recommends extraction south of the River Ouse. 
    Chris Shaw said it is important to find out why this site has been selected against this guidance. MKC are expected to take the plan to public consultation for a 12-week period from July to October but there was some concern from members that over the summer holiday period when many parish councils, including Olney, would not be meeting.

    Recreations and services
    On behalf of the committee, Tony Evans said that the new fence surrounding the football pitch on the Nursery Field was not universally popular, with complaints being made that it prevented the public accessing town owned land. He asked the council whether the gates around the field could be left open, but also impose a dog exclusion order. John Sharp noted that during the recent Rugby 7s tournament, cars had parked at the bottom end of the football pitch in a similar manner that had originally been proposed as a permanent arrangement, but now abandoned, by OTC. He noted that it had passed without incident. There were reports that Olney Town Football Club has been sub-letting pitches to the Colts in contravention of their lease. The council felt that any such income should go to OTC and not the club and will investigate.

    New parking restrictions
    MKC have proposed a number of changes to waiting restrictions around the town, mainly around Weston Road, The Knoll, West Street and East Street. The council agreed to support the proposals, so the next step will be advertising the necessary Traffic Regulation Order on which members of the public will be able to express an opinion.

    Emergency plan
    Months ago, the council embarked on the creation of an emergency plan to be bought into operation in the event of flood, plague or pestilence etc. It set up a sub-committee under the chairmanship of Ron Bull.  He reported that it had been very difficult to engage people in the plan and felt there was very little interest in it. He said he was very disenchanted with the whole matter. Deidre Bethune proposed that the council drop the plan and this was passed by a majority.

    Hearing loop
    As reported last month, the Council Chamber hearing loop system provided temporarily by Jeremy Rawlings for previous meetings had proved successful, and Tony Evans thought it should become a permanent fixture. Jeremy Rawlings noted that for the equipment to be installed, it would be necessary to drill through the wall of the council chamber. This was followed by a protracted (though not entirely serious) debate about how the hole should be drilled, by whom, at what level and which picture of past distinguished mayors would need to be moved to enable it (readers might like to Google ‘Parkinson bike shed’ for an explanation of this phenomenon).

    Highly Commended Clerk
    Steve Clark announced that Town Clerk, Liam Costello, had recently been awarded a Highly Commended certificate by the Society of Local Council Clerks. Steve presented Liam with his framed certificate.

    unknown
    Town Clerk Liam Costello receiving a Highly Commended certificate by the Society of Local Council Clerks


    Odds and sods
    Steve Clark reported that more than 100 veterans had attended the annual Armed Forces Day held at the Carlton House Club and much appreciation had been expressed by those present. However, he was disappointed to note that only two members of OTC were present. Joe Stacey reported that the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group were progressing with the questionnaire that would shortly be sent out. Ron Bull noted that a number of private premises had trees and shrubs extending into footpaths, causing problems for pedestrians. He suggested that members of the public contact the highways department of MKC, where discussions with the property owners had not resolved the matter. Tony Evans said there had been reports of loud music being played on the recreation ground late at night. The police had been called but seemed reluctant to take action. It had been repeated the next night near the old reservoir at the top of Long Lane, where the police had attended and confiscated the equipment.  No Meeting in August Next Meeting - 1st September There being no meeting in August, so the next one will be held at 7.30pm on Monday September 1st in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre.  Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    There was no Olney Council report for August 2014


    No Meeting in August

    As usually is the case, there was no meeting in August.


    Olney Council report for September 2014

    A Minute's Silence
    At the start of this month’s meeting Mayor Steve Clark requested that all present stand for a minute’s silence to pay their respects to Police Officer Kevin Leaney, who was tragically killed in a road accident in July.

    Public Participation
    There were two members of the public wishing to speak at this month’s meeting. The first was Susan Warren regarding the ongoing problems of parking in Oakdown Crescent. Susan said that her husband’s illness and subsequent death had not given her time to pursue the issue but had now ‘got her Mojo back’! She pointed out that Brian Rice had been told at the last meeting that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Ward Councillor Peter Geary would approach MKC for an update and report back at this month’s meeting.

    The situation had worsened because part of the pathway had now become broken up which could cause the tenants to fall

    Susan Warren
    It was not on the agenda, she said, and was appalled that the elderly tenants had been pushed into the background. She said the situation had worsened because part of the pathway had now become broken up which could cause the tenants to fall. If it happened to her mother she would have no hesitation in taking Olney Town Council (OTC) to task by presenting them with a very large bill. In recognition of the council’s omission from the agenda Steve Clark said he would permit Peter Geary to give an update after the next item of public participation. Elaine Herniman spoke on behalf of the Allotment Holders Association regarding the recent increase in monthly rents from £2 to £3 per pole. Elaine said that nationally there have been press reports of instances of increased rents, which range from successful high court cases where rate increases have been revoked, to rents which are only increased in line with inflation. In November 2013 the Recreations and Services committee voted to increase all other fees by 5% and the allotment rents to £3 per pole but the meeting minutes did not state the existing rate, which could have led members to believe this this would also be a 5% increase. It was, in fact, a 50% increase, she pointed out. Elaine said the Allotment Act 1950 states that rents should cover the associated overheads only and be non-profitable. Since the land for the Olney allotments was bequeathed by the Earl of Dartmouth many years ago there was no cost are associated with the purchase of this land. She asked the council to provide a breakdown of the cost to serve of the allotments, as a figure of £5k per annum had been muted but not substantiated. If the increase in the rent per pole means the allotments are actually subsidising the other amenities, this increase could be deemed to be unfair. She asked that any future rent increase is kept in line with the rate of inflation and more importantly in line with other leisure amenities in Olney. 

    Oakdown Crescent parking
    Peter Geary said that two years ago OTC had put in a bid for funding and had been allocated £10k for traffic orders. It was accepted that this was never going to be enough and if double yellow lines were marked in Oakdown Crescent it would need to be in conjunction with additional parking elsewhere. MKC had considered a number of possibilities including a roadway round The Pyghtle, demolition of nearby garages and creating additional spaces on land known as ‘Jack’s garden’. He said there is an opportunity to apply for funding from the current round of capital schemes, which is open until the end of September and recommended that the Recs and Services Committee put forward a proposal to MKC. It would need a significant amount of money though, he warned.  Tony Evans was of the opinion that it should be discussed and agreed by the full council, not just Recs and Services and John Boardman agreed, saying that it was important for all members to be aware of and fully understand all of the options. Joe Stacey said that regardless of who was responsible for the issue OTC should drive the solution and solve the problem once and for all. Peter suggested a site meeting with all three ward councillors plus Steve Clark.

    Market Place CCTV
    Susan Hughes from the Neighbourhood Action Group (NAG) was present to give an update on the project. She explained that the Police and Safer MK Partnership have purchased a number of cameras and were prepared to give OTC a month’s free trial in order to assess which of the two models to consider. Deputy Mayor, Jeremy Rawlings, asked if costs were available and was told that one was £4k and the other £6k. Colin Rodden thanked Susan for her work so far and asked if a cost for the full surveillance system could be obtained. Peter Geary felt that OTC was right to continue, with the proviso that funding can be made available either by cutting expenditure elsewhere or increasing the Parish Precept.

    unknown
    Olney Skate Park Request

    Berrells Court resurfacing
    In 2011 local resident Roy Turner obtained planning permission to erect two dwellings in Berrells Court on the site of some garages. One of the conditions of the planning consent was that the applicant lays a tarmac surface along Berrells court before development commences. The court is a public right of way but is not registered as belonging to anyone, has not been adopted by MKC and the surface is currently in a very bad state. OTC has agreed to take the lead in the resurfacing and will take contributions from interested parties, including Mr Turner who will make the major contribution. Recently Mr Turner obtained a variation in the planning consent to require him to resurface the road before occupation of the properties, rather than commencement of the building. OTC have obtained an agreement from Mr Turner to pay two thirds of his contribution up front to enable OTC to commence the work, with the remaining one third to be paid upon completion. Once again the matter of long term maintenance was raised, although Deidre Bethune cut the discussion short by saying that OTC had agreed to progress with the project, subject to agreement by Mr Turner and it was not a matter for discussion now. 
    Town Clerk Liam Costello said that because it was not adopted the owners of the adjacent properties would be responsible for the upkeep. 
    Peter Geary pointed out that the surface was being laid to a high standard so there will not be a problem of pot holes appearing for many years. He added that OTC would be making up the shortfall of the funding as not all residents and businesses in Berrells Court were prepared to contribute. 
    John Boardman asked if OTC could apply to have it adopted once resurfaced but Peter said the drainage via soakaway would preclude this. 
    Ben Brock asked what would happen if Mr Turner sold the properties before completion. It was agreed that in that case the final third should be payable on point of sale and the agreement would be modified accordingly.

    Tesco deliveries
    Concerns have been raised by residents of East Street about the impact of lorries delivering to the rear of Tesco in the Market Place. It appears that Tesco have honoured the promise made to only use small vehicles for deliveries, but other suppliers are using large lorries which are not suitable for such a narrow access. One resident had suggested placing bollards on the pavement to ease the situation. Peter Geary thought that provision of bollards could be requested as part of the current capital scheme but wondered if it was now time to revisit the original request from Tesco to have timed loading bays at the front of the store. Joe Stacey suggested that OTC contact these other suppliers directly, pointing out the problem but Peter thought it was up to Tesco to resolve the matter themselves. 

    Draft Minerals Plan
    As reported in July, in order to meet the required provision of aggregates the emerging MK Minerals Local Plan should identify specific sites for extraction. As part of the ‘call for sites’ process the industry has put forward a total of 14 potential sites for allocation in the plan. Peter Geary pointed out that the Manor Farm and Lavendon Mill sites could result in an extraction rate of 70 to 80 thousand tonnes per year and not the 70 to 80 Tonnes stated in the July Mercury report. He said that MKC had done a poor job in approaching landowners and also the process plants are situated in Wolverton, so it would have made more sense to consider sites closer to there. He suggested that the actual demand might be less than estimated in the plan, so it might be possible to remove one or more sites. Peter will draft a response on behalf of OTC.

    Odds and Sods
    The existing wi-fi system provided by MKC to the library will be extended to the rest of the Olney Centre, although OTC will have to foot the bill of £3.8k. There was some discussion of whether this ought to go out to tender but Liam Costello said that the extension of the library network from the existing provider would be considerably cheaper than a new standalone system. He pointed out that corporate bookings for the centre had been lost due to the lack of wi-fi.  The new fence round the football pitch has reduced dog fouling but Jeremy Rawlings said that it had increased on the Youth Club field. Tony Evans said that there did not seem a great desire from the Rugby Club to support the proposal to allow limited parking on Doff’s Field on match days. Tony Evans said that MKC were not fulfilling their obligation to maintain the public play areas. An officer from MKC had recently made an unannounced inspection and will be producing a report. Next Meeting - 6th October The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th October in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for October 2014

    Public participation
    There were two people speaking in this slot, both on the topic of Oakdown Cresecent.
    Sue Warren, whose mother lives in Oakdown Crescent, started by thanking Deidre Bethune for her support throughout this long running issue. A site meeting held in the Crescent, which some of the Councillors had attended, had allowed many of its residents to air their views. She hoped that Councillors could now see how upset the residents were. She also asked if the agreed resolution had been sent to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) and, if so, who was going to chase to ensure it was implemented. Brian Rice spoke next, stating that people in Weston Road wanted their say. He felt that the best solution would be to provide road access to the houses and provide additional parking along the new road.  This topic is covered in more depth below.

    Healthcare Review
    Wayne Rabin, from Healthcare Milton Keynes, gave a presentation on the Bedfordshire and Milton Keynes Healthcare Review. The quality, consistency and effectiveness of local health services need to improve, and changes in demand, for example due to population increase, need to be catered for. Alongside these, there are financial challenges. While funding is set to increase, if Milton Keynes Clinical Commissioning Group doesn’t change the way services are commissioned, it will start running at an increasing deficit, predicted to be £25m in 2018/19. Similarly, Milton Keynes Hospital Trust, running a £13m deficit in 2013/14, would run at a deficit of £31m in 2018/19. Broadly speaking, the strategy is to provide care closer to home, work with Milton Keynes Hospital to help it become more efficient, and look at ways the General Practice (GP) services could be configured to serve patients better. In spite of being asked by various Councillors, in various ways, if there was a plan to reduce the number of employees in healthcare, Wayne insisted that there was not.

    Oakdown Crescent
    First some background. In a meeting held a couple of weeks before, Councillors had discussed various potential solutions to the parking problem, and decided to put forward the following for inclusion in MKC’s capital programme scheme: • Additional parking to be provided on the land adjacent to 102 Weston Road, and resurfacing the parking spaces along the track from Dagnall Road. • Demolish the garages in the Crescent and redesign the area to provide additional parking. • Introduce a residents’ parking scheme in Oakdown Crescent, not to be implemented without both the above. Back to this meeting, Jeremy Rawlings introduced this topic by summarising the above. Deidre felt it important to make the area safe, noting the poor condition of the pathways due to cars driving over them. Peter Geary explained that, due to what sounded to Mercury like an administrative anomaly, the Crescent and its pathways had not been invested in for some time. However, it had been adopted by MKC a year ago and, thus, defects could now be reported and repaired in the normal way. Standing Orders were suspended in order to allow the Public to discuss the issue with Councillors. Brian Rice explained that, while he felt for those who live in the Crescent and didn’t want to park his cars there, he did need to. He was against the proposed changes because he felt the new parking areas would be a haven for thieves. Instead, he felt that an access road would be the proper solution. Peter Geary explained that a new road around the South and East boundaries of the Pyghtle had been discussed, but rejected due to the reduction in green space and its high cost: MKC wouldn’t build a new road for five or six houses. To get something done, Olney Town Council (OTC) had to be reasonable in what it asked for. The discussion concluded with Peter saying that any scheme would be consulted on before implementation – agreement was needed from local residents. Brian said that agreement on the solution proposed would probably not be forthcoming. One Councillor was heard to mutter ‘Oh dear’ before discussion moved on.

    Draft minerals plan
    MKC had produced a Draft Minerals Local Plan, and invited OTC to respond to it. Peter Geary had drafted a letter in response, and this was discussed now. The aim of the Plan was to select the sites from which minerals should be extracted, and decide how much from each. Peter felt the estimated amount of aggregate required overall was unrealistically high, and suggested some reasons for this. He also felt that more recycled aggregate should be used, thus reducing the figure further. Finally, he explained that extraction should be as close as possible to the developments for which it was required, meaning that it should be focussed South of the River Ouse. As the Lavendon Mill site is North of the river and there are other suitable sites nearer to Milton Keynes, he suggested the Lavendon site be removed from the Plan. There was general agreement, and Peter’s letter will be sent.

    More housing in Olney
    Peter Geary and Ben Brock left the meeting for this section, having earlier declared an interest. The MKC Site Allocations Plan is out for consultation until 5th November, and OTC has been asked for its views on the proposed sites for new housing development in Olney. It expects Olney to take around 300 new homes by 2030, and proposes five possible sites: • The strip of fields to the West and North West of Aspreys, excluding Ousedale School, the field immediately to its North, the School sports field and the public field to its West. Indicative capacity 825 houses. • The proposed Sainsbury’s site plus the field over the road to the South. Indicative capacity 74 houses, 46 excluding the Sainsbury’s site. • The field to the North and West of Ousedale School. Indicative capacity 252 houses. • The field between Warrington Road and the Sewage Works. Indicative capacity 117 houses. • The strip of dismantled railway between Yardley Road and Osier Way. Indicative capacity 59 houses. All this information is available for you to see. So, for more detail, surf to http://bit.ly/119osnu, click Site Allocations Plan, download the pdf and go to page 98. After discussion, Councillors decided to wait on the outcome of the Neighbourhood Plan, which will be sending a questionnaire to Olney residents at the end of October, with responses required by the end of November. Results will be compiled by the end of the year, and OTC will submit its response to the consultation then, some two months after the consultation period has ended. Views differed about whether or not this delay would be a problem. Chris Shaw concluded discussions, saying that there’d been no nasty surprises and that the decisions taken soon would define developments well after 2031.

    Berrells Court
    As noted in earlier Mercury reports, OTC has wanted Berrells Court to be resurfaced and has been seeking financial contributions from interested parties. OTC has now received the first part of the developer’s contribution, so a subcontractor will be engaged to do the ground work for the new road surface, with the surface itself being completed after the dwellings have been fully constructed but before they’re occupied. Councillors voted to accept the quote of £41,550, and to cover its liability of around £5,050 from Section 106 monies. The vote was unanimously in favour, bar Jeremy Rawlings voting against. Peter Geary thanked Jeremy for chairing the discussion so impartially.

    Weston Road play area
    As reported before, the Weston Road play area was removed due to a mixture of rot and technical issues. The landscaped area that replaced it looks good, but a consultation of nearby residents was strongly in favour of new play equipment being installed. MKC will propose a new play scheme, consult and hope to implement it in 2015. Peter Geary stressed the need to obtain concrete acceptance from MKC that, as well as building, they’d maintain the play area.

    Olney Town Colts
    Olney Town Colts Football Club have planning permission to build a clubhouse on the left of the toilet block on the Recreation Ground. They had some financial issues related to the VAT treatment of the build which delayed them from building over the summer. That gave them the opportunity to consider whether the location chosen was the best one. Subsequently, they had discussions with the Rugby Club about an extension to the Club building, but these proved not to be feasible due to the location of the main sewer pipes, which run to the pumping station in Austen Avenue through Doffs Field. They are now exploring the feasibility of building adjacent to the Football Club on the Nursery Field.

    East Street parking
    The need to provide additional parking on East Street has been clear for a while, and plans are being drawn up for parking on two strips, one to the West side of Doff’s Field and one to the West side of Nursery Field. The two sites would stay grassy, with a system such as Grasscrete or Ecogrid being used to toughen up the surface.

    Crouch’s Field
    When the council obtained planning permission to use Crouch’s Field as parkland a few years ago, there was a restriction that it could not be used for organised sports activity. This was, as reported before, because of the sport-related traffic problems at the weekends. The logic was that more pitches would generate more traffic and more parking problems.
    OTC is currently exploring with MKC whether the restriction could be transferred from Crouch’s Field to the Allotment Field, thus moving the pitches on to Crouch’s Field and concentrating sporting activity closer to the clubhouses and main car park. At the moment OTC is getting pre-application advice from MKC, and waiting for its response.

    Name change
    The Council had received a request for permission to hold Booze on the Ouse on the weekend of 20-21st June 2015. Ron Bull stated that he was offended by the name and that Tony Evans, absent from this meeting, agreed. He’d prefer it to be called ‘Blues on the Ouse’ and wanted OTC’s agreement for the event being held to be conditional on a name change. This was put to the vote and lost narrowly: four yes versus five no with one abstention. Therefore, permission to hold the event was granted, with no condition placed on the name. Next Meeting - 3rd November The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd November in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for November 2014

    Public Participation
    Sue Warren Sue Warren was the only person to speak in this slot, again on the topic of Oakdown Crescent. Sue asked if there’d been any update since last month’s meeting. Liam Costello replied that there had not, with Milton Keynes Council’s (MKC’s) Highways Department saying that the issue wouldn’t be dealt with until 2015.

    Sainsbury’s Planning Application
    As reported before, Sainsbury’s has submitted a Planning Application to build a store on the land immediately North East of the A509 roundabout with Lavendon Road. This Council meeting had been held in a larger room than usual in order to allow more of the Public to attend and, given the number of people present for this item, that proved a good decision. Ben Brock, who’d earlier declared an interest in this item, left for its duration. Peter Geary and Ron Bull had sent their apologies and were thus absent from the whole meeting. David Lazenby of Sainsbury’s, backed up by Maria Allaway of GKA, a property consultancy which has been representing Sainsbury’s for this Application, gave a short presentation outlining the proposed development. The site would include, from West to East, a 20,000 square foot store, a car park with 200 spaces, and a six pump petrol station. Customers’ vehicles will enter and leave the site from a new roundabout on Lavendon road, around two thirds of the way from the roundabout to the left hand bend. Coloured high friction road surfacing will be installed at key points, and there’ll be a bus stop on each side. In response to public feedback, Sainsbury’s has added more windows to the store and more trees on the site. There are various environmental measures including the use of LED lights and, for non-potable purposes, harvested water. The Public Consultation, sent to all households in Olney and Lavendon, achieved a 30% response. Apparently, 10% is typical. The responses yielded 79% in favour of the development, 20% against and 1% undecided. The store would compete primarily with Coop and Tesco Extra, and would sell day to day food products and stationary, for which there’d be some overlap with existing shops. Steve Clark explained that, as with all Planning Applications, the decision was not for Olney Town Council (OTC) to make. Instead, OTC would give its views to MKC, which would then make the decision. There was a good discussion on the topic, including some input from Jackie Fitzmaurice for which, being a member of the Public, Standing Orders were suspended. A much summarised version is included here. Jackie, who lives close to the proposed store, raised the issue of the site’s water table being high in Winter, and was sceptical as to whether the fact that the stream overflows across much of the field during that season had been considered. David responded that the water flow had been analysed, the stream could perhaps be dredged if required, and the Environment Agency would in any case state and enforce its view if needed. Councillors asked about night time lighting for the car park (LED lights, 60% off during the night) and how the site would look from various aspects. Chris Shaw drew the discussion to a close, stating that the proposal was pretty good, that the consultation had enjoyed significant support and that Sainsbury’s seemed to have gone the extra mile to accommodate local concerns. He felt that, while there would always be some difficulties around any new development site, overall it would be beneficial to Olney. He proposed that Councillors vote on the issue, and Jeremy Rawlings seconded the proposal. Councillors voted ten in favour of the scheme with one abstention (Rosemary Osborne). So, OTC will write to MKC stating its positive view, subject to various comparatively small caveats.

    Neighbourhood Planning
    You should all have received a Neighbourhood Plan questionnaire with the previous issue of the Phonebox. To be counted, it has to be completed and returned back to OTC’s office in the Olney Centre by the new date of Tuesday 9th December. A team will collate the returned questionnaires, plus those filled in online – surf to olneyplan.com and click consultation.

    Wi-Fi
    The Olney Centre now has a public access Wi-Fi system, installed on 27th October.

    MKFM
    Steve Clark introduced this topic. Local radio station MKFM, www.mkfm.com, has been broadcasting on the internet for several years and has supported various Olney events. It has the opportunity to bid for an FM radio licence and Steve asked if OTC would like to send it a letter of support. It’s notable that, since Horizon was taken over by Heart FM and BBC 3CR has seen various cuts, there is no FM station genuinely local to Milton Keynes. Councillors voted in favour of sending the letter.

    The only Town Council website?
    OTC’s website is olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. Jeremy Rawlings explained that there was another similarly named site, olneytowncouncil.co.uk, which, while unconnected with OTC, was presented in such a way as to make it appear to be associated with the Council. After a short discussion, Councillors decided that Jeremy should write to the site’s registered address, asking to open a dialogue.

    Emberton Park
    Steve Clark reported on a recent meeting of the Emberton Park Liaison User Group. The transfer of the park leasehold from Emberton Country Park to the Parks Trust appears to be making no progress. Emberton Park was opened on 5th June 1965, meaning that its 50th anniversary is mid next year. Built on an area which was previously a gravel works, it was the first country park to gain accreditation from the Countryside Commission.

    Loud Music
    You may remember that, earlier this year, there were a few incidents of loud music being played antisocially at various locations around Olney, including in the playing fields by the river. The person responsible pleaded guilty to causing a public nuisance and had to pay a £1,250 fine plus costs. Next Meeting - 1st December The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 1st December in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for December 2014

    Public Participation
    First to speak was Timpsons Row resident, Dave Hoyland. He said that residents were suffering from inconsiderate and ‘illegal’ parking and were concerned about the proposed switch of sporting use from the allotment field to Crouch’s Field which they felt would only increase the problem. 90% of the vehicles causing the problem belong to Olney residents ignoring the existing notices, he said, and painting yellow lines would not be an effective solution. On three occasions he had not been able to get his car off of his drive and was concerned that emergency vehicles would not be able to get through to old people’s accommodation.  Mayor Steve Clark said the matter would be an agenda item at the next Recreations and Services sub-committee. 
    The next speaker was 
    Mike Richardson. Mike explained that he was a previous owner of the property that until recently had been Westlands care home. Mike said that there has been considerable speculation about the future of the building which has recently been sold, particularly on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook group. Mike said the new owners were a company that owns a number of properties in the Bedford area that have been converted into ‘half-way houses’ for prisoners to be reintegrated in to the community. His own enquiries had identified that CCTV and security equipment was being installed and the existing residential layout of the building had been retained containing a bed and a single chair. New mattresses had also been provided, all of which indicated that the future use could be as a half-way house. The building currently had class 2 Planning Permission and this would need to be changed to class 2A for such a use, although this could be done retrospectively he said. He said that in his opinion two or three ex-prisoners was acceptable, but up to 20 in the centre of town was a complete “no-no”. He finished by asking if Olney Town Council (OTC) could contact the new owners to find out what was happening. Steve Clark said that OTC would not normally get involved until planning permission was applied for. Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Ward Councillor Peter Geary confirmed that there had been no pre-planning enquiries yet but said that it was possible to apply a stop notice if it appeared that planning permission was being breached. He said that in his opinion Olney was a long way from the services that newly released prisoners would require and this would be made worse with the reduction in the bus service that was Mercury report Olney Town Council likely to happen in the new financial year as a result of budget cuts. Steve Clark concluded the debate by saying that it was sad that it could not continue as a care home, as one of the parties that had expressed an interest in buying the property had wanted to do. The last person to speak was Susan Hughes on behalf of the Neighbourhood Action Group (NAG). Susan said that the free trial of the CCTV in the Market Place was ready to start. The lamp post at the side of the bus shelter had been identified as the best location for two cameras with full tilt, zoom and pan capability with a third just aimed downwards. The council will discuss the trial at a future meeting.

    Oakdown Crescent parking
    There were no updates to report but Town Clerk Liam Costello said that an officer from Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Highways Department had visited to investigate the reported poor condition of the pavement and found it to be satisfactory so no action would be taken.

    Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF)
    This year’s event was a financial success, so there will be no need to call in the much discussed indemnity provided by OTC. Sam McCallum was present at the meeting to present the accounts and request permission to hold the event on 11th to 13th September 2015. Although this meant that the event would not coincide with the Farmers’ Market the Chamber of Trade believed a two day event would still be viable. She said that if next year’s event was financially successful they would look to invest in more Christmas lights to run the entire length of the High Street. In the light of the successful collaboration with other voluntary organisation in the town, Sam said she was looking to create an ‘Olney Events’ sub-committee of the chamber which would act as an umbrella organisation to share resources and the first meeting would be held in January.

    Olney Town Colts changing rooms.
    Present were Ian Stokes, representing the colts and Malcolm Thomas, representing Olney Town Football Club (OTFC). Ian explained that planning permission had already been granted to build changing rooms adjacent to the existing council building on the recreation ground, using part of the council compound. However, he had recently been in consultation with OTFC and Olney Rugby Club (ORFC) about building a combined facility which would allow the RFC under 18 ladies use of the changing rooms. (A number of councillors expressed surprise and delight at this news and Mercury wondered if Satan had also been seen ice skating down the High Street!). The plan is to build an extension on the southern end of the football club so that it forms an ‘L’ shape. In order to benefit from the various grants that had already been obtained it would be necessary to have clear construction timescales in place by March 2015, so the intention was to apply for planning permission before Christmas.  Because of this the RFC had reluctantly decided to step away, given that the RFU grant process would almost certainly extend beyond this deadline. Colin Rodden wondered if the combined facility would be likely to exacerbate the already difficult parking situation but Peter Geary was of the opinion that the combined facilities may help with the previously discussed parking problem in Timpsons Row. He was concerned that the MKC planning process might cause delays, though. The discussion then deviated to cover the various proposed parking schemes for the sports facilities, until Steve Clark brought the discussion to a close by proposing that OTC support the revised planning application. The motion was passed unanimously.

    Speeding Traffic on Driftway
    A complaint had been received about traffic exceeding the speed limit on Drift way, between Wellingborough and Yardley Road, and the correspondent asked if it would be possible to provide 30 MPH repeater signs as a reminder. Jeremy Rawlings said that distance between the lamp posts meant that repeater signs could not be provided. Peter Geary suggested that a Speed Indicator Device (SID) could be installed for a short while. This would have the effect of slowing vehicles down and also recording speeds to prove that a problem does exist. Ben Brock wondered if it would be possible to provide school signs. Liam Costello will investigate both options.

    Neighbourhood Plan
    Joe Stacey reported that to date 601 responses had been received and the two drop in sessions had been reasonably well attended. He said that a £5k grant is available to cover the cost of a Housing Needs Analysis and suggested that the results of the housing location survey be sent to MKC, but Chris Shaw was concerned that OTC should not commit to a policy based on the results of a small survey return.

    Odds and sods
    The council gave permission for The Pancake Race to be held on February 17th 2015 and the Duck and Raft Race on 5th July. Tony Evans reported that the gate at the entrance to the recreation ground was frequently being left open. He also pointed out that vehicular access was strictly for loading and unloading and not for parking. The Tennis Club were particularly poor at observing this rule, he said. Steve Clark reported that he had recently attended the Ousedale Awards for Achievement, along with various other civic dignitaries, and the standards get higher every year. He said he had sent pictures of the event to the MK Citizen and was disappointed that they only appeared to be interested in printing stories about badly performing schools.  Rosemary Osbourne reported that residents of Chantry Rise were not receiving the MK Citizen. She had contacted their office and been told that a conscious decision had been made not to deliver to the area, although it may be reinstated next year. Peter Gearysaid that MKC’s forthcoming budget for the next financial year would be the toughest ever and there would be cuts in the provision of waste bags, library services and public transport, amongst other services. 
    The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th January 2015 in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.

    ------
     
    Mercury's reports for 2015


    Olney Council report for January 2015

    Public Participation
    Mike Hughes Mike Hughes spoke first in this slot. Mike represents Olney on the Petsoe End Wind Farm community fund, which provides grants for locally based energy efficiency projects in public buildings or spaces. Examples of grants awarded so far include energy efficient lighting in the Olney Centre and solar panels at Clifton Reynes Church. He said that the fund is looking for new projects to provide grants for, and invited Councillors to consider if there were any projects which would meet its criteria. Sue Warren Sue Warren spoke briefly on the subject of Oakdown Crescent, focusing mainly on the poor state of its pathways. This topic is covered in more detail below.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Following on from Sue’s point above, Councillors discussed the state of Oakdown Crescent’s pathways. Some Councillors, particularly Joe Stacey and Deidre Bethune were frustrated with the poor state of the pathways and, likely, the lack of progress on the parking problems. Peter Geary explained that the criteria used by Milton Keynes Council (MKC) to decide when pavement needs replacement are independent of its location and use. For example, the criteria for pavement outside an old people’s home would be just the same as that in a general residential area. He advised Olney Town Council (OTC) to attempt to persuade MKC’s Highways Department that the generic criteria cannot be suitable for every scenario and that, in this case, an exception needs to be made and some of the pavement replaced. Liam Costello will request that Highways Department representatives accompany Councillors on a site visit. As a side note, Steve Clark noted that he’d seen the parking issue mentioned in minutes from a Tenants’ Association meeting... over 20 years ago.

    Consultation on parking charges in Olney
    MKC is conducting a parking consultation for the Borough, and one of its proposals is relevant to Olney: “(To) introduce charges to outer area long stay off street car parks in the older towns, at 40p per hour, capped at £2.40 per day, with the first two hours being free parking for Shop and Go.” It’s believed that such charges would be collected via Pay and Display. If implemented, they could apply to the three Olney car parks run by MKC: Silver End / Cattle Market (33 spaces), Silver End / East Street junction (six spaces) and Fountain Court (38 spaces). Specifically, they would not affect the car parks on the Market Place, at the Rugby Club and beside the Coop. MKC is consulting so it can learn and take into account local views before making any decision. Peter Geary explained that the idea was not a new one, and was aimed at plugging a gap in MKC’s budget – more of which later. He suggested a possible tie in with the Oakdown Crescent parking problem, for example that OTC could respond saying that, if the Pay and Display measures went ahead, the additional parking near Oakdown Crescent must be provided immediately. There were various discussions on the possible effects on local businesses. As background, Councillors also discussed an issue in Central Milton Keynes, where the increased price of the red premium bays has pushed people into the purple bays, price increases in turn pushing some shop workers into the local estates, in turn requiring the introduction of residents’ parking schemes: Overall, had any money been made by these increases? Steve Clark noted that Pay and Display car parks need policing and enforcement, which cost money. Finally, Peter noted that, if this scheme did not go ahead around the Borough, MKC would need to find a £207,000 saving elsewhere in its budget. The general, though not unanimous, view appeared to be against the introduction of Pay and Display. Thus, Liam Costello will draft a response in that vein and also talk with Stony Stratford Council, which is strongly against MKC implementing Pay and Display in its town.

    MKC budget consultation
    OTC had been asked to comment on MKC’s consultation for its 2015/16 budget. This was discussed for some time, and just the main points are covered here. According to the consultation document, MKC has cut its spending by £68m since 2011 and needs to cut it by a further £70m by 2020, an equivalent of £1,300 per household. Central Government is cutting the funding it gives MKC by over 40% and this year MKC needs to cut its spending by over £22m. While some Councillors picked on certain of the many spending reductions, the overall feeling was that it was not possible for OTC to analyse every line of the very long document. In particular, it was felt difficult to disagree with cut X without proposing a similar cut Y to take its place. Some Councillors felt it may be sensible not to submit a response if it wasn’t possible to perform sufficient analysis of the figures. Peter Geary felt OTC should respond but that the vast majority of the cuts would go through: MKC is running at a deficit now and has no spare money to avoid them. Peter also felt that the internal side of MKC had not been looked at, with middle management, for example, having actually increased. As an idea of the magnitude of the cuts, regular readers and bus users will be aware of cuts made already to local bus services. Peter noted that MKC had so far cut £207,000 of its bus subsidy. It has another £900,000 of bus subsidy cuts still to make. Peter, who as a Ward Councillor is more acquainted with the budget detail, will provide further information to Liam, who will then draft a response and work with Councillors to review and submit it.

    Underwriting BOFF
    In recent years, OTC has agreed to underwrite the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF), but those decisions have been far from unanimous. Until a few years ago, it has also underwritten TOG’s Fireworks Night. In this item, Councillors discussed how OTC would approach underwriting future BOFF events. Peter Geary wanted to generalise the discussion, setting guidelines for what events the Council would underwrite. John Boardman and Tony Evans felt OTC should not underwrite BOFF because it’s a commercial operation over which OTC has no control. Tony also mentioned that, after claiming once on the Fireworks Night underwriting due to extremely poor weather, TOG had given money back to OTC and had played it very fair. Colin Rodden felt that BOFF was a very positive event for the town and that its organisers should have the opportunity to give a presentation to Councillors. Deidre Bethune, a member of the Chamber of Trade, explained that this year’s BOFF had been run differently and, while some in the Chamber were unhappy with this, it had made a good deal of money. She felt that BOFF was gradually separating from the Chamber, hoped BOFF could hold back enough money to underwrite itself in future, and noted that the Chamber had little money of its own. Peter Geary felt that once an event ‘has legs’ it shouldn’t need OTC underwriting on an ongoing basis. Councillors voted on a proposal by John Boardman and Tony Evans to consider not underwriting BOFF: Eight voted in favour and one, Peter Geary, against. OTC will write to the BOFF organisers explaining its intention not to underwrite BOFF in the future, and encouraging them to put money aside for a rainy day.

    Sports pitches and parking
    A Planning Application has now been submitted to move the ‘no organised sports’ restriction from Crouch’s Field to the Allotment field immediately to its South, with the aim of bringing organised sports closer to the clubhouses and car parks. OTC has appointed David Smith Associates to investigate the feasibility of providing additional parking spaces in the car park adjacent to the Rugby Club, on the Club side of Doff’s Field and in the Nursery Field adjacent to East Street.

    Swimming Steps
    Tony Evans reported that a gap of two to three inches has again opened up at the bottom of the Swimming Steps. On previous occasions this gap has been filled with concrete but, clearly, that does not appear a viable long term solution. He noted that fixing the problem could be expensive. Next Meeting - 2nd February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for February 2015

    Public Participation
    Stan Wicks spoke first in this slot about the problems of congestion at the Coneygere and Church Street junction. He said that cars were regularly parked on both sides of the junction meaning that lorries very often had to back up. He asked that the council consider requesting double yellow lines to be provided on the junction. Milton Keynes Council (MKC) will be informed of the situation. Next to speak was Donna Derby, Director of Transformation and Delivery for Milton Keynes NHS Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), on the subject of the MK Healthcare review. Although Donna was subject to the strict three minute rule which Olney Town Council (OTC) imposes for public participation she managed to impart a huge amount of information and did not read a pre-written statement, so Mercury hopes that the information has been captured correctly. Donna explained that the review had been set up nine months ago to address the clinical and financial sustainability of Bedford Hospital and Milton Keynes Hospital and generate options for delivering high quality, sustainable health services for the residents of Bedford Borough, Central Bedfordshire and Milton Keynes. Milton Keynes does not have the same growth profile as other towns, she said. The population is growing (+15% by 2021) and ageing (+45% over 65s in MK from 2012 to 2020). The incidence of long-term conditions, such as diabetes, asthma, dementia, coronary heart disease is increasing as the existing population ages, but increasingly elderly people are moving in to the area to be closer to their families. Without change, Milton Keynes Commissioning Care Group and hospital could have a combined deficit of £56m by 2018. The next phase of the review will:

    • Develop plans to offer more care closer to home, i.e. move services away from hospitals into GP surgeries or the home;
    • Carry out further detailed work on the preferred options for the future provision of hospital services;
    • Develop a detailed plan outlining the practical steps that need to be taken to prepare for public consultation. This plan would be delayed till the end of the year, due to the need to avoid any activities which could be deemed as publicly sensitive in the run up to the general election;
    • Keep clinical, public and patient engagement at the heart of the Review.
    The review of hospital services had generated two options, she said.
    • Milton Keynes Hospital to retain its role as a Major Emergency centre and expand to include other services, while Bedford Hospital would lose some of its existing services and become an Integrated Care centre. 
    • The reverse of the above.

    Joe Stacey said that the Neighbourhood Plan had already identified the need for expanded medical facilities in Olney and this made it more pressing. Donna agreed, saying that a way forward would probably be the multi-purpose health campus providing long term care for conditions such as dementia and diabetes. Steve Clark asked why chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continued to be such a drain on services. Was it because of historic smoking, he wondered? Donna agreed, but said it was also down to a high immigrant population in Milton Keynes. For further information on the review go to www.shapingmkhealth.co.uk/about/

    Oakdown Crescent
    Town Clerk Liam Costello reported that Olney Town Council’s (OTC) bid for funding from the MKC 2015/16 Capital Programme for improved parking in the area had been approved and a scheme would be produced for consultation. Rosemary Osbourne hoped that it would include repairs to the pathways as well. Deidre Bethune agreed, reminding members that MKC had already stated that the pathways met their generic safety standards, but OTC did not believe that this was sufficient for an area housing elderly residents. 

    Windfarm Fund
    Mike Hughes was present to discuss with the council any projects of a sustainable nature that might be appropriate to be paid for out of this fund. Tony Evans reported that the Recreation and Services Committee had suggested that a suitable use might be to replace some of the existing Christmas lights with energy efficient LED lights at a cost of about £5,000. There appeared to be no other suggestions and Mike was of the opinion that it would probably qualify, so OTC will make an application to the fund committee for funding. 

    Mayor’s Prize for Ousedale School
    As reported previously, Mayor Steve Clark had attended the awards ceremony at Ousedale School and had been very impressed with the attainment of the students and the range of awards made. He had been in discussion with Mike Barry, the mayor of Newport Pagnell, regarding the award of a Mayor’s Prize for students at the campus within their respective parishes. Colin Rodden supported the idea, saying that anything that forged links with the school must be a good thing. Jeremy Rawlings suggested that the award should take the form of a trophy and a cash prize. Ex-Ousedale teacher Ron Bull expressed the opinion that the awarding of prizes did not actually encourage students to work any harder and Steve Clark agreed, but thought that it might be the ‘icing on the cake’. Steve said he would consult with Mike Barry and the Ousedale Head and report back.

    Olney Library closure
    Do you care if Olney library closes? Well it probably will do, unless you do something about it. A review of Community and Cultural Services is currently being undertaken by MKC in the light of unprecedented pressures on its budget. The review aims to save £2.75m by the end of March 2016 and will cover services such as libraries, services for young people and children’s centres. It will look at how the public and stakeholders can engage with MKC to explore ‘innovative and alternative approaches to service delivery’. This might include transferring assets such as buildings to community groups or parishes and joining with other local groups to pool resources. No services will be closed immediately as £1.5m has been set aside to fund them while the review takes place and MKC Ward Councillor Peter Geary explained that in previous years a clear pledge had been given that no libraries would close. However, that was no longer the case and unless OTC ‘does something’ then there is a real possibility that the Olney library could close. He suggested a consultation with a sub-group to find out if the residents of Olney really want to keep their library. This was only the first of many similar requests that are likely to come from MKC, he said. Ward Councillor David Hosking was also present and he emphasised that the base budget was being replaced by the temporary transition funding, meaning that the library could close in 12-18 months if OTC does not assist.  The OTC purchase of the Olney Centre from MKC under the community asset transfer scheme is progressing and OTC would like completion by the end of this financial year, but OTC solicitors have some concerns which they have raised with the MKC solicitors. 

    Annual budget and precept
    OTC is intending to increase the fees it charges in line with the Retail Price Index for the next financial year. Mercury assumes that this is to avoid accusations of unreasonable hikes when fees have remained the same for several years, as happened this year. This proposal was agreed on a majority vote with no declared abstentions but a few apparent ‘no votes’. The Council Tax Precept (i.e. the amount from the Council Tax allocated to OTC by MKC) will rise from £166,000 to £170,150, an increase of 2.5%. This will equate to an increase in the Band D Council Tax (commonly used as the benchmark) of 1.76%. This was again passed by a majority with one vote against.

    Sports pitches and parking
    As reported last month OTC has appointed David Smith Associates to investigate the feasibility of providing additional parking spaces in the car park adjacent to the Rugby Club, on the Club side of Doff’s Field and in the Nursery Field adjacent to East Street. Initial plans have now been received and it was clear that there is much disagreement between members on the various options. Ron Bull was of the opinion that the entire thing was money badly spent, when for 95% of the week the existing car park is empty. Why spend so much for 5%, he asked. Colin Rodden thought that OTC should be encouraging people to park in the existing car park and walk to the shops. Tony Evans disputed these arguments, saying that the improved parking would benefit everyone and not just the sports clubs. The plans had the potential to provide over 100 additional spaces, he said, and proposed that the next step should be to draw up a proper specification and get competitive quotes for the work. Peter Geary supported the proposed layouts and said that OTC should consult with residents once proper plans are available.

    Ousedale School Admissions Policy
    Although not part of the agenda, this was raised by Deidre Bethune under the item of Member’s Matters. Deidre said she was concerned that the school was intending to introduce a new admissions policy that would give priority to students attaining grade 2 in music for 10% of the places. The Neighbourhood Plan had already identified concern that the school was reaching capacity and local children might not get places and this latest proposal increased that possibility. David Hosking said the criteria seemed to be based on ‘aptitude’ rather than ability but because Ousedale is now an academy it is outside of MKC control. Peter Geary said he was not against the proposals so long as Ousedale intends to expand by 10% to cope with it, as local children will be disadvantaged. Colin Rodden expressed disappointment that the school had not consulted with OTC before publishing the proposals. Steve Clark noted that the consultation period ends on 24th February and proposed that a holding letter be sent requesting that the proposal is not implemented. A member of the governing body and a member of staff will be invited to the March OTC meeting to discuss the proposed changes

    Odds and Sods
    A request from Newport and Olney Lions to hold Motorama on the Market Place on 14th June was approved. A request from John Scarrott and Sons to hold the annual fun fair on the recreation ground from 17th to the 20th of June was initially approved, until it was pointed out that the council had already given permission to Olney Town Colts to hold their annual BOTO on the same weekend. Liam Costello said he would discuss with the various parties involved to reach agreement. The owner of 15 Kippell Hill has applied to MKC to purchase a plot of land to the front and side of his property. OTC agreed to support the request with the proviso that it is not used for building. Three members of staff have now received Speed Indicator Device training. This includes correct ladder climbing techniques so they will be able to install the Speed Indicating Devices discussed last month. Next Meeting - 2nd March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for March 2015

    Public Participation
    Richard Freeman Richard Freeman spoke on behalf of Sport for Willen Hospice. A group of riders aim to cycle an 800 mile route from Paris to Nice in eight days starting on the 18th September. The target is to raise £100,000 for Willen Hospice, itself facing a £500,000 deficit this year. He asked if Olney Town Council (OTC) would consider a contribution towards the group’s target. The Council discussed this later in the meeting and, in a vote proposed by Deidre Bethune, voted unanimously to donate £1,000. For more information, including how to donate, surf to rideforwillen.co.uk. Brian Rice Brian Rice spoke next, on the long running topic of parking in Oakdown Crescent. He asked when, now that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) has allocated a sum of money to address the problem, consultation with nearby residents was going to take place. This was discussed later in the meeting, with Liam Costello reporting that MKC Officers have recommended that a scheme for improvements in Oakdown Crescent be included in their Capital Schemes for 2015-16. This recommendation is subject to Cabinet Member approval scheduled for 17th March. Peter Geary explained that, once approved, Officers will design one or more schemes, and consult OTC and the Public prior to implementation.

    Ousedale admissions consultation
    As reported in last month’s Phonebox, the original admissions proposal will be amended to give priority to children within the catchment area, with only those from outside and applying for one of the limited number of musical aptitude places needing to sit a separate test. This change was announced in a meeting held at Ousedale’s Newport Pagnell Campus on 24th February. The change and the way the consultation was conducted raised a few issues which Councillors now discussed. During the meeting at the School, Sue Carbert, head teacher, appeared to say that Olney’s Ward Councillors had made ‘illegal’ comments in relation to the issue. Having taken legal advice and believing they’d done nothing wrong, the three Ward Councillors followed this up with a letter to Sue asking her to clarify her comments. Since this Council meeting took place, the School has replied saying that the Councillors had not done anything illegal. In terms of the proposal itself, Councillors appeared relieved that it’d been amended, although there was frustration at what they saw as the poor quality of the consultation, and concern that the School perhaps did not appreciate the scale of expansion planned within its catchment area over the next 10 years and the effect this would have on pupil numbers. Finally, David Hosking explained that the musical test would specifically measure aptitude as opposed to ability, measurement of the latter for admissions purposes being illegal under that Schools’ Admission Code. So, for example, the test may involve questions about and appreciation of music, but will not take into account grade exams.

    Westlands
    As reported in an earlier Mercury, Westlands, on the A509 opposite the Market Place, has been sold. There’s been a good deal of rumour concerning its future use, much centring on it becoming a ‘half-way house’. The building is now owned by the Marks Trust who, as well as assuring OTC that it was not responsible for the rumours, wishes to convert the building into apartments. MKC was apparently not supportive of the idea, citing the lack of nearby residential parking. The Trust had asked OTC for its view and, after a brief discussion, the Council decided to defer expressing an opinion until a Planning Application was received.

    BOTO and fair date clash
    John Scarrot had asked OTC if he could bring the fair to the Recreation Ground for the long weekend of Friday 19th to Sunday 21st June. This period coincides with Booze on the Ouse (BOTO) and concerns were expressed about the clash, mainly that the sound of the fair would affect BOTO’s Friday Comedy Night. Due to these concerns, OTC will respond that the fair can be held on the Recreation Ground but on a different weekend or, subject to later consultation, on the same weekend but on Johnson’s Field or, scaled down, the Pyghtle.

    Community Asset Transfer
    As reported before, the Olney Centre is being transferred to OTC under the Community Asset Transfer scheme. This is taking a while, mainly due to legal wrangling between solicitors, but the aim is to complete the transfer in March. As such, and in order to avoid a further delay until the next full OTC meeting, Councillors agreed that a small group of Councillors would have authority to make the final decision then report back to full Council.

    Neighbourhood Plan
    Joe Stacey reported that the returned questionnaires, containing over 5,200 comments on 27 different subjects, were now being analysed and that, for each subject, a summary will be written. He then explained that the number of new houses planned for Olney was based on the town’s share of the total number planned for rural areas by the MK Core Strategy. It now appears that Newport Pagnell may take considerably more than its planned number of new houses and, as such, there may be some flexibility in the number of such houses required in Olney. Finally, he noted that the Bedfordshire Railways and Transport Association (BRTA) has, over the years, kept an eye on the original track bed of the long closed Northampton-Olney-Bedford line, objecting to developments which could prevent it from being reopened. Joe explained that, as both the Government and Northampton County Council had contacted BRTA, rejecting its proposals to reinstate the line, there was no point in referring to the matter in the Neighbourhood Plan.

    East Street car park
    As reported before, OTC is investigating the provision of additional car parking spaces, primarily to reduce the parking problems which arise at times during weekend sports events. Detailed drawings have now been received for the proposed changes to East Street car park, adjacent to the Rugby Club. In summary, the drawings show that 161 marked spaces could be provided in five rows running East to West, 49 more spaces than currently. The changes required to achieve this include removing the row of trees along the North side of the car park (33 spaces), removing the row of trees along the West side (11 spaces) and removing the central raised area. Joe Stacey questioned whether further spaces could be accommodated if the car park was made one way. Residents living immediately to the West of the car park have already expressed concern about the trees on that side being removed. Also, another nearby resident has requested that MKC widely publish its proposals for both the East Street car park and the additional car park on the West side of the Recreation Ground.

    Warrington Road development
    As previously reported, MKC has granted Outline Planning Permission for the small parcel of land, immediately North West of the Warrington Road office development and South East of the sewage works, to be changed from employment use (category B1, office) to residential (C3). OTC was, as usual, asked for its views on the Application, and gave various reasons it thought it should be rejected. Anglian Water runs the sewage works and was thus consulted on the Application. It responded thus: “Our initial odour risk assessment indicates that there is potential for loss of amenity at sensitive property within the proposed development due to odour emissions from the operation of the Water Recycling Centre (WRC). This WRC is operated in compliance with the appropriate regulatory standards and in accordance with established best practice; however, the process is inherently prone to short periods of relatively strong odorous emissions, against which there is little practical mitigation.” However, the MKC Officers’ report on the application, in its Consultations and Representations section, stated simply that Anglian Water had cited “No objection”. Joe Stacey felt this was a misrepresentation of their response. Peter Geary stated that the Planning Permission could not be overturned because it has been more than twelve weeks since the decision was made, that being the limit before which any Judicial Review to challenge it must start. He suggested instead that OTC make a formal complaint to MKC. What would happen then is unclear, though post meeting questions suggested that MKC does have powers to overturn the decision if it felt that there was something significantly wrong in the way it had been taken, but that may expose them to paying compensation to the applicant.

    Bits’n’bobs
    Martin Ward, Head Groundsman, has retired and OTC is recruiting for his replacement. MKC has withdrawn its proposal to impose charges for using its car parks in the outlying areas of Milton Keynes Borough, and is developing a parking strategy. Peter Geary believed that, while this proposal was unlikely to reappear in next year’s budget, there was no guarantee that it would not re-emerge after that. The Police Office closed for the last time on Monday 16th March, and there’ll now be a mobile Police Office visiting Olney on Mondays and Fridays, 10.30am - 12.30pm starting on Friday 20th March. Steve Clark reported that plans for the Sainsbury’s store are still moving forward. Peter Geary gave a brief outline of some of the anticipated MKC budget cuts. A review of Libraries and Children’s Centres will start in April, and although there’s been no pledge on Library opening hours, there is a pledge that no Library will close. The bus service cuts, initially a very significant £900,000, will now be £150,000. Council tax is expected to increase by around £1.95%, and black bin bags will no longer be provided.

    Walk
    Steve Clark explained that Mick Rogers, from Burton Latimer, has just started the 5,500 mile walk from Kettering to Kilimanjaro. He’s aiming to average around 25 miles per day, then climb up Mount Kilimanjaro itself. He expects this to take around five and a half months and is hoping to gain the record for a person of his age, 50 years, for the climb. He’s doing the walk with the aim of raising £55,000 for Macmillan Cancer Support. Steve had met him in Olney on his first overnight stop. Next Meeting - 13th April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 13th April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the Public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for April 2015

    Public Participation
    Shaun O'Reilly First to speak was Shaun O’Reilly on the subject of proposed expansion of the Olney Town Council (OTC) owned car park, known locally as the Rugby Club car park. A number of improvement schemes have been suggested and Shaun, whose house backs on to the car park, was concerned about one of them which involves removal of some trees. The houses in East Street benefit from the privacy and security that these trees provide, he said. The area is also a meeting point for skateboarders and the trees provide a noise barrier to the ‘shrieking’ which can often go on to the early hours. The trees had a more aesthetic quality than a fence, he suggested. Town Clerk Liam Costello replied that OTC had been back to the consultants responsible asking for an increase in car parking spaces that would not involve removal of the trees. Joe Stacey said that the various options will be considered at a future meeting of the Recreations and Services committee. Elaine Herniman Second to speak was Elaine Herniman regarding the Community Allotment which has been running since the end of last year. The Community Allotment is run by a volunteer committee with the aim to give people who would not normally work on an allotment, such as children or disabled people, a chance to experience it. The committee have already been successful in obtaining grants for the first phase and now want to move on to the second phase, which involves building a poly-tunnel to provide a multipurpose environment to grow produce all year round, but also to have a warm and protected area for education and environment projects. The tunnel would be slightly larger than the 8’ x 10’ limit which currently applies to erections on the allotment. The matter was later discussed as a formal agenda item and unanimously agreed.

    Alan Richardson
    Before the start of the formal section of the meeting a minutes silence was held for Councillor Alan Richardson who had recently passed away. Apart from being a councillor, Alan was a local historian and popular member of the community. Mayor Steve Clark said that there had been a large attendance at Alan’s funeral and in recognition of his huge commitment to the Olney Centre Steve thought that it would be fitting to provide some sort of memorial there, perhaps a plaque on the wall in the Garden Room. The members agreed unanimously to proceed with a suitable memorial.

    Recreation ground play area
    Liam Costello reported that there had been little progress on the plans for Milton Keynes Council (MKC) to replace the play equipment and that MKC had fallen behind with the work. Deidre Bethune said that OTC must push for a resolution and Colin Rodden agreed, saying that the young people of the town do not ask for much and with summer approaching it was important to have a target date for completion.

    Austen Avenue parking problems
    John Boardman reported on his recent experience of the thoughtless and selfish parking by some users of the sports facilities on the recreation ground and Charity Field. On a recent Sunday the entrance to the pumping station was blocked, despite a sign saying 24 hour access required and cars were parked head to tail on the grass and the pavement and in the turning area at the bottom of the Task. John said he had observed a police officer giving out tickets who told him he had almost run out of tickets and had not yet dealt with the cars parked on double yellow lines. John said he had been approached by mothers with prams and mobility scooter users frustrated and annoyed that nothing is being done to resolve the problem. John said he didn’t think it was enough for OTC to rely on the provision of extra parking spaces to resolve the problem and people are looking for action now, possibly by more police involvement. Jeremy Rawlings thought that the sports clubs need to take more responsibility for informing their users about correct parking and said it had been discussed many times at the Joint User Group. Colin Rodden said it was great that the sports clubs were so successful and popular, but maybe if the police continue ticketing then the word may get around. Deidre Bethune said that an ‘A’ board is often displayed by the allotments and maybe consideration should be given to providing some in Austen Avenue. Ron Bull wondered whether a leaflet campaign on windscreens might help. Chris Shaw felt that the proposed addition 74 spaces would help as users would want to park as close as possible to the sports facilities, but John Boardman was not convinced, saying that people will tend to park where they know spaces exist, having seen the same cars in the same position each week.

    Sainsbury’s planning gain
    Sainsbury’s have now formally applied for planning permission to build a new store at the north end of the town. Planning obligations under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, commonly known as s106 agreements, are a mechanism which makes a development proposal acceptable in planning terms that would not otherwise be acceptable and are often referred to as ‘developer contributions’ or ‘planning gain’. Although MKC specifies a number of services on which the money is to be spent, there is scope to seek an additional contribution for out of town supermarkets to mitigate the impact on existing town centres. Before he and Ben Brock left the meeting, having declared an interest, Peter Geary said that OTC should ensure that as much of the social infrastructure funding as possible should stay within Olney and is not used in the wider MK. The MKC Passenger Transport Manager has requested £20k be spent towards provision of two real-time bus information displays and two bus shelters on Lavendon Road. Deidre Bethune thought the displays to be a waste of time and money as there are no longer enough buses to justify them, although Chris Shaw disagreed. One of the categories specified by MKC is for public art, which Jeremy Rawlings suggested could be used for some decent art on Whirly Pit roundabout. Steve Clark proposed that a bid should be made to retain the voluntary sector and public art contribution to be spent within Olney which was agreed unanimously.

    Cleaning the war memorial
    It is some years since the war memorial was given a ‘wash and brush-up’ and it is now in need of cleaning again. An estimate of £2.7k has been received, which some members questioned and Deidre Bethune wondered if the British Legion might be asked to contribute. Joe Stacey wondered if it could be done with a pressure washer but Deidre said it needs to be carefully and professionally done in order to protect the lettering. Peter Geary said that the British Legion exists to support veterans and their families and this would not be a correct use of their funds. John Boardman agreed, saying that the memorial is an important part of the town and OTC would be expected to pay for the cleaning. £2.7k is a reasonable price, he felt. Steve Clark proposed that OTC pay for the cleaning, which was passed unanimously. A short discussion followed concerning the MKC policy of using weed killer to prevent the grass growing in areas where it would be difficult to cut. Peter Geary thought that it looked unsightly, particularly around the war memorial. He said OTC should consider using the trainee groundsman to strim in such areas to avoid the ‘scorched earth’ appearance.

    Housing development near to sewage works
    Last year MKC approved a planning application for 33 dwellings with access from Yardley Road in Olney on the Land at Warrington Road and Osier Way, despite a number of objections from OTC and comments from Anglian Water, who operate the sewage works adjacent to the land. Anglian Water stated that the treatment process at the sewage works is inherently prone to short periods of “strong odorous emissions” (translation: Stink!) and the noise from the pumping station would affect properties within 15 metres and suggested a condition there be no development within 15 metres of the boundary. OTC’s objection included the fact that the proposed houses would be remote from the rest of the town and its services and that enquiries by the developer as to the need for further employment development had taken place during a recession and subsequent building of houses on the land would preclude any future business development when the recovery came. The land previously had planning permission for business use but the applicant successfully argued that there was no demand for additional employment use and permission was thus granted for residential use. The planning officer had ignored OTC’s objections and summarised Anglian Water’s comments as ‘No Objection’. The developer has now submitted an application for a further 33 residential properties on the site, which has been refused by MKC, primarily because it is outside of the planning boundary, but the report also apparently used some of OTC’s objection to the initial development as justification. Ward Councillor Peter Geary suggested that OTC make a formal complaint to MKC as to the manner in which the initial application was dealt with, since the refusal will probably be subject to an appeal which could go to a public enquiry. If the appeal was successful it could open the flood gates to a number of similar applications, he thought. He noted that the planning officer and management team who passed the original plans were no longer employed by MKC so it was unlikely that there would be any comeback. Chris Shaw felt that it was important to get an admission from MKC that an error had been made in granting the original application, as that might influence any appeal on the second phase. Steve Clark proposed that OTC lodge a formal complaint, which was passed unanimously.

    VE Day 70th anniversary
    The council have received a government request to participate in celebrations to mark the 70th anniversary of VE day. The beacon at the top of Barnfield will be lit at 21:30 on Friday 8th May and the public are invited to attend.

    Town Meeting
    The Annual Town Meeting will take place on Thursday 14th May at 7:00 in the Olney Centre and all registered electors of the Parish are invited to attend. It is your chance to meet your councillors and quiz them on any local matters of concern you may have.

    Odds and Sods
    The transfer of the Olney Centre to OTC under the Community Asset Transfer scheme is being delayed due to ongoing discussions between the solicitors representing OTC and MKC. Peter Geary thought it a travesty that the late Councillor Alan Richardson, who did so much for the centre, did not live to see it completed. Colin Rodden said he had been in discussion with MKC about the siting of the green cabinets used to provide high speed broadband outside the building previously used as the police office. He felt that the larger of the two presented an obstruction to people using the crossing point and should have been placed against the wall, not in the middle of the pavement. It appears that the MKC officer responsible had been out of the office when Colin first contacted him and as a result the contractors had placed it in its present position. As Openreach had now connected all of the infrastructure it would now be very difficult to move and would likely be in position for the next 10 years or more. Of course, if a large vehicle were to accidentally hit it, mused Mercury….. A presentation on the trial of the Market Place CCTV trial was due to be given at the June meeting, but Peter Geary requested that it should happen at the May meeting instead, due to the impending retirement of Community Policeman Andy Perry. If any members are wavering in their support of the scheme they should visit the MK police control room to see it in action, he suggested. Martin Ward will be retiring as Head Groundsman in May and the council have appointed Bob Marshall as his replacement. He will work with Martin during May to ensure a smooth handover. John Scarrot has been invited to visit Johnson’s Field with a view to deciding whether it is a suitable alternative venue for the annual fair, but has not yet done so. Planning permission has been granted for Crouch’s Field to be used for sporting activities. Saturday June 6th marks the 50th anniversary of the opening of Emberton Park and there will be a public open day running from 10:00 to 16:00, Steve Clark reported. Next Meeting - 11th May The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 11th May in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for May 2015

    Public Participation
    Ian Stokes Ian Stokes spoke on behalf of Olney Town Colts Football Club, which has around 320 children in teams from under six to under 18 years. As reported before, the Colts had originally planned to build their changing facility on to the South end of the toilet block and tractor shed compound and had obtained Planning Permission from Olney Town Council (OTC) to do so. Then, the Colts had proposed an alternative: Olney Football Club (OFC) has senior teams, and the Colts could build on to OFC’s existing Club building. But, after around six months of planning and associated expense, on 5th May OFC advised the Colts that it could no longer afford to continue with its part of the project. The associated delay means that the Colts are facing the potential loss of the associated grants and sponsorship, and are thus keen to move quickly while the funding remains available. Ian outlined three options: revert back to the original compound site, seek an alternative location, or postpone the project. Since further delay would risk the existing funding, and it had taken significant effort to get that funding, he felt neither of the latter options was viable. So, he now sought OTC’s confirmation that it was still acceptable for the Colts to build on to the compound, under the Planning Permission they had obtained originally. Ian was aware that, due to how recently the situation had changed, there was insufficient time for this item to appear on this month’s agenda and, thus, Councillors did not discuss it in full. However, in terms of the key point – whether the Colts still had the go-ahead to build on to the compound – Steve Clark appeared to say that they did not. Following up after the meeting, the Council said that, although the original Planning Permission for the Colts to build on to the compound remains valid, Olney Town Council withdrew its permission for them to do so when the Planning Permission for building on to the existing Football Club was given. Further, it felt that some calm reflection on the changed circumstances and different views, including its own changed needs, was required rather than to rush into a decision which might not be the best way forward for all concerned. Despite being asked if he’d like to speak, Tony Evans, Chair of the Recreations and Services Committee, was silent on this issue. Presumably, we’ll hear more next month.

    Co-option
    OTC has a vacancy for which four candidates had applied. Of these, one had withdrawn and the remaining three each gave a brief talk to explain why they should be co-opted onto the Council. The first, Malcolm Messenger, had been a Policeman in Olney and then Alderney and, having served on OTC before, was keen to do so again. Sally Pezaro, with background as a midwife, was young and felt she could help OTC serve that demographic better. Catherine Rose, a local musician, business owner and Green Party member, focussed on education and the arts, and had fundraised for Cobbs Garden Surgery. Councillors voted and, of the 12 present, eight voted for Sally Pezaro who, being the clear winner, signed up and took her seat alongside the other Councillors.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Although, unusually, none of the interested parties was in the Public area to hear it, Liam Costello updated Councillors on progress towards alleviating the parking issues in Oakdown Crescent. Liam had spoken with Rob Ward, Milton Keynes Council (MKC), and confirmed that approval to spend the money had been given. A scheme is now being designed, which will then need to be consulted on before any work was done. Along with Deidre Bethune, Joe Stacey was frustrated with the slow progress, and pushed Councillors to ask for firm dates. Peter Geary explained that Rachel Kingsley, Head of Highways Services at MKC, was now on long term sick leave and that her role had been taken over by David Hall, who was now trying to get a grip of various capital projects which appeared to be ‘going nowhere’. He suggested OTC contact him to arrange a meeting and get firm dates for the preliminary design to be completed and the consultation to start, and an anticipated date for the construction to start.

    Footpath
    As reported before, the informal right of way, from Austen Avenue alongside Doff’s Field to the river bank then South to the Clifton Reynes bridge, will likely become a Public footpath. The Order to make this change has been submitted to the Secretary of State for consideration. Anyone who wishes to make any comment or objection, even one they’ve made before, needs to submit it by 21st July, in writing to Jean McEntee, The Planning Inspectorate, Rights of Way Section, Room 3/25 Hawk Wing, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Temple Quay, Bristol BS1 6PN. Ron Bull asked if the Fishing Club, which currently maintains some footbridges on which the path relies, would receive any financial recompense for this work. Peter Geary replied that, when the footpath was agreed, the Club should contact MKC to see what it proposed. Apparently a typical arrangement is that the Council provides the materials while the landowner, or in this case the Fishing Club, provides the labour.

    Elections
    Steve Clark was re-elected Mayor and Jeremy Rawlings his deputy, both unopposed. Elections complete, the main part of the meeting could get underway.

    Olney Centre
    Deidre Bethune reported that the Community Asset Transfer of the Olney Centre was now complete and, thus, it was now Olney Town Council’s. She, along with other Councillors, noted how sad it was that Alan Richardson, who’d done much of the work to reach this point, didn’t live quite long enough to see the result.

    Swimming Steps
    A gap has been opening up in the Swimming Steps, between the bottom and next step, due to the flow of the water past them. It’s now reached around four inches and, as reported before, the Council has been investigating how to repair it. The option being discussed is sheet piling, where a group of piles is driven into the ground close together to resist the pressure of the water.

    Susan Hughes
    Susan Hughes has been awarded a Local Policing Area Commander’s Commendation for her role and work in connection with the Olney Neighbourhood Action Group and MK Safer Neighbourhoods Delivery Group, both of which have made a significant contribution to the residential and business communities of Olney. The award ceremony will take place on 11th June at Milton Keynes Police Station.

    Recreation Ground play area
    As reported late last year, OTC hopes that improvements can be made to the Recreation Ground play area. The approx. £100,000 of improvements originally planned relied on MKC receiving half the amount as matched funding. This was expected to come from a Waste Recycling Environmental (WREN) Grant but, as there are no applicable, for example landfill, sites close enough to Olney, that source is unavailable. Instead, and after some delay, MKC has recently applied to Biffa Waste Services for the matched funding. This application may or may not be successful and, if not, it’s possible that Section 106 money could be used instead, but there remains some risk that no funding can be found. Councillors were acutely aware of the delay in making the improvements, and explored the idea of consulting the Public for its view on how the play area could be improved, in parallel with the funding being obtained. Given that the funding is not guaranteed, this approach carries some risk. After some discussion, Councillors agreed by majority to push ahead with the consultation, being open about the fact that the associated funding is not guaranteed.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    Steve Clark thanked The Olney Group for its help with the VE Day beacon lighting event, for which it provided lighting and marshals, while Tony Evans provided the fire. He noted that, as well as the event being planned rather at the last minute, the publicity was restricted deliberately in order that the number of people attending would not overwhelm the limited marshalling and facilities in place.  Continuing from the VE Day publicity discussion, OTC is considering whether to have a Facebook page. Peter Geary noted that he’d read of some cowslips on Driftway being destroyed before they’d flowered which, them being a protected plant, should not have happened. Liam explained that, due to the gradient of the grass mounds on Driftway, OTC employs a contractor to cut the grass. Peter explained that OTC must make sure its contractor was aware of the cowslip’s protected status. Tony Evans felt that, while a few cowslips may have been cut, the majority were still there. Finally, he noted that, if anyone wished to see cowslips, they should head up to Barn Field and take a look at the sea of yellow. As a postscript to this topic, OTC contacted Mercury shortly before publication to say that, according to their post meeting research, cowslips are not a protected species under any legislation. The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 1st June in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for June 2015

    Welcome
    Mayor Steve Clark welcomed new elected mayor of Milton Keynes, ward councillor Keith McLean to the meeting.

    Public Participation
    Sue Warren and Ron Mihill Sue Warren and Ron Mihill were present to speak in the public participation section of the meeting. Sue spoke about the parking issue in Oakdown Crescent which, being a meeting agenda item, will be reported later. Ron Mihill Ron said he was chairman of the Pegasus Residents’ Association but was also speaking on behalf of Clifton Court residents and was concerned about the ability of elderly and disabled people to cross the roads around the Market Place, particularly by Silver End where the traffic comes from three directions. Traffic is getting faster, he said, and requested a facility to enable safer crossing. Ideally that would be a pedestrian crossing but he thought that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) would say that it would cost too much. In that case, how much did it cost to provide the electric vehicle charging point, he wondered? Mayor Steve Clark said that the matter would be put on the agenda of a future meeting of Olney Town Council (OTC) so that it could be fully discussed.

    Market Place CCTV
    PC Andy Perry was present, along with Susan Hughes from the Neighbourhood Action Group (NAG) to present the proposals for a CCTV scheme. Andy explained that they had looked at other schemes in and around Milton Keynes to see what is most suitable for Olney. Milton Keynes had cameras connected to the Command Suite at Central MK Police Station by dedicated fibre links and Newport Pagnell had the same but provided over a microwave link. Because of its location Olney would need a repeater at the top of the hill between Olney and Newport Pagnell, which would add to the cost. He thought that the best option would be via a broadband link to Newport Pagnell police station which would not be permanently operated and monitored in real-time, although it could be when resources allowed. The main use would be for historic monitoring and review up to twenty eight days after incidents had occurred, he said. Andy then showed a number of clips of video to demonstrate a number of high and low definition options, including some footage from the recent CCTV trial in Olney. Ward Councillor Peter Geary asked why it wasn’t possible to provide a broadband link back to CMK Police Station and Andy thought that although it was probably technically possible there may be capacity and resourcing issues. A few councillors asked if some dummy cameras could be installed, since the current proposal was for a single camera. Andy said he was not convinced of the effectiveness of dummy cameras and because the single camera would be mounted in a darkened glass dome it was not possible to tell which way it was pointing. Steve Clark thanked Andy and Susan for the presentation and said the decision whether to progress with the scheme would be an agenda item on next month’s meeting. Colin Rodden wondered if the intervening month could be used for a public consultation. Steve closed the item by wishing Andy a long and happy retirement.

    Oakdown Crescent
    At last month’s meeting Town Clerk Liam Costello reported that progress was being made towards alleviating the parking problems in Oakdown Crescent. Liam had spoken with Rob Ward of MKC who confirmed that approval to spend the money had been given. A scheme was being designed, which would then need to be consulted on before any work was done. None of the interested members of the public were present at last month’s meeting to hear this news. Sue Warren used the public participation section of this month’s meeting to express her annoyance that she and the other interested parties were not at last month’s meeting and launched an attack on Liam, saying that he had let down the tenants and his reply to her was an insult. The council should have chased MKC on the financial situation and just because the relevant person at MKC was on long term sick this was no excuse for lack of progress, she felt. Liam replied that he had arranged a meeting with MKC on 8th June. Deidre Bethune said the council do care about the residents’ plight and had been working to move things forward. It was unfair of Sue to attack Liam, she said, and was supported by Steve Clark. 

    Colts Clubhouse
    As reported previously, the Olney Town Colts FC had originally planned to build their changing facility on to the end of the toilet block and tractor shed compound and had obtained support from OTC to do so. Then, the Colts had proposed an alternative scheme to build on to Olney Town FC’s existing Club building. But, after around six months of planning and associated expense OFC advised the Colts that it could no longer afford to continue with its part of the project. The associated delay means that the Colts are facing the potential loss of the associated grants and sponsorship, and are thus keen to move quickly while the funding is still available. Tony Evans, as chair of Recs and Services Committee explained that he didn’t speak when this was raised in the public participation section last month because it was not a formal agenda item. He expressed his bitter disappointment that the combined scheme had progressed so far before stalling. All sports clubs in the town embrace youth, with the exception of OTFC, he said. Since agreeing to support the original plan to build on the council compound, the council’s own position had changed, he said, and they had realised that they needed the space to store new equipment. Peter Geary was of the opinion that OTC should sit down with all parties and try and find a way forward and to ensure that the promised funding is protected. Ian Stokes, representing the Colts, said he was not convinced that OTFC will commit to the project and believed that the Colts were now bound to lose some of their sponsorship. He emphasised that the Colts comprised 320 local children of all ages who would directly benefit from the scheme, as opposed to some of the senior sports clubs where a large number of players came from outside of the town.

    Library and Cultural Services Review
    MKC needs to make significant savings over the next three years and the library service is one area which initially appeared to be under threat. MKC are looking for ideas from community groups, businesses, parish and town councils and local people who both use and do not use the service. Colin Rodden wondered what the footfall was for users of the Olney Library and wondered if residents really wanted it. A session was due to be held at Olney library on 25th June for MKC to present some current proposals and also for residents to put forward any ideas of their own. Peter Geary replied that figures have not been provided and thought it important to know the proportion of users that are Olney residents or come from the surrounding villages, and also the demographic of those users. Keith McLean said that he had recently been to a meeting in Stony Stratford where a group called the Friends Of Stony Stratford Library Service, known as FOSSLS had been formed. Mercury wondered if was now time to mobilise the Friends Of Olney Library Society.

    Communication and Publicity Strategy
    Steve Clark said there had been a complaint made at the recent town meeting regarding OTC’s Co-option process for new members. For information, when a vacancy occurs it must be advertised and if ten members of the electorate request it an election will be held. If no request is made then the council will co-opt from eligible applicants. Steve said the same system had been in use by OTC for many years and that if people were really interested in the workings of OTC then they would read the Mercury report in The Phonebox and get to know what was going on, an opinion echoed by Jeremy Rawlings. The fact that four candidates had put themselves forward for the latest vacancy was very good, he thought. Deidre Bethune wondered if vacancies should be advertised more widely. Ron Bull suggested using a strong visual impact on noticeboards where people are likely to see them, such as shops in the town. Joe Stacey suggested that there should be a formal procedure in the council’s standing orders for publicity and candidates’ statements. Sally Pezaro informed members that there was now an OTC Facebook page to counter criticism that the Olney Noticeboard had been used to publicise the recent vacancy. Anything on there would be considered ‘official’ she said, pointing out that the profanity filter had been set to ‘high’!

    unknown
    Olney


    Objection to new dwellings adjacent to sewage works

    As reported in the April edition, MKC last year approved a planning application for 33 dwellings with access from Yardley Road in Olney on the Land at Warrington Road and Osier Way, despite a number of objections from OTC and comments from Anglian Water, who operate the sewage works adjacent to the land. A similar application for another 33 dwelling was recently refused planning permission by MKC primarily on the basis that it is outside of the planning boundary. OTC have complained to MKC about the inconsistencies in the decision-making surrounding the two applications and also that the comments made by Anglian Water about the potential impact of the sewage works had not been included in the report which recommended acceptance of the first application. A letter of response has now been received from MKC denying that there had been any inconsistencies in the two decisions but accepting that comments made by Anglian Water had not been included in the first report. However the report went on to say that Anglian Water had not actually recommended that the application be refused so the summary of ‘no objection’ was factually correct. Jeremy Rawlings said he would not have expected MKC to admit to any wrong doing and Peter Geary said he thought it was a ‘whitewash’. The complaint regarding the inconsistencies had been answered robustly, he thought, so there was no use pursuing that aspect but suggested that OTC should now raise the issue of the Anglian Water comments to the second tier of the complaints process. Steve Clark said it was not Anglian Water’s role to formally object, but to raise issues to be considered in the overall planning application. He noted that pumps do not run all of the time so the noise may have not been present when MKC made their assessment. Jeremy Rawlings said the smell was only present at certain times so the same would apply. Steve Clark said he was fed up with MKC not listening to recommendations made by OTC and proposed that the complaints process be raised to the next level.

    Odds and Sods
    Joe Stacey reported that a meeting had taken place between the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group, doctors and Practice Manager at Cobbs Garden Surgery, and Donna Derby of the MK Clinical Commissioning Group to discuss future provision of services on new premises in the Town. Investigations had also been carried out into the capacity of the local schools. Liam Costello reported that there will be no funfair in the town this year. The date proposed by John Scarrott had already been promised to the Colts for BOTO and no alternative date or location had been agreed. Colin Rodden said he thought that the litter problem in town is getting worse and adults seemed to be worse offenders than children. Ron Bull reported that his band of willing volunteers had put up the baskets round the lamp-posts recently. Jeremy Rawlings observed that there were an increasing number of advertising boards appearing around the sports facilities on the recreation ground, some of them very large. He didn’t express an opinion on the matter but pointed out that such signs need planning permission and the various clubs had been warned last year that MKC could issue an enforcement notice to have them removed. Chris Shaw expressed a view held by many that the associated income is an important source of revenue for the clubs. The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th July in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate


    Olney Council report for July 2015

    Public Participation
    Dana Green First to speak in this slot was Dana Green, on the subject of ragwort. Originally covered under the 1959 Weeds act, ragwort had an act all to itself when the Ragwort Control Act was introduced in 2003. Dana keeps horses in the area and, as a result, has been removing ragwort from the local area when she sees it. She believed the problem was getting worse, saying for example that there were four plants on Driftway when the road was built and that she’d recently seen 50 there. She asked if Olney Town Council (OTC) could remove it from the ditches on Driftway and those between the playing fields. Steve Clark, also Chairman of Trustees at Redwings Horse Sanctuary, explained that ragwort was toxic to many animals, causing liver damage. Although animals tend not to eat it when in flower, the plant then dries out, gets mixed up in hay and then eaten with their feed. Steve said OTC would attempt to deal with ragwort on its property. Sue Warren and Brian Rice Sue Warren and Brian Rice both spoke on the topic of Oakdown Crescent. Summarising, Sue liked the idea of there being marked parking bays in the Crescent, each with its own lockable post, thus allowing residents’ relatives to park when visiting. Brian felt this idea would be rejected if it went out for consultation and, instead, wanted a roadway to be built to provide both additional parking and road access to the nearby houses which have none. Along with Sue, he was frustrated at the lack of progress. This subject was covered further later in the meeting. Lesley Weston Lesley Weston spoke about the bus fare increases seen by local under 19s. Judging by the letters page of the 9th July MK Citizen, this is an issue affecting other parts of Milton Keynes also. There are two issues affecting Olney under 19s, the second affecting those in Milton Keynes Borough as a whole. First, as of last year, the #1 bus to Newton Leys via Bletchley starts from Newport Pagnell rather than Olney and, thus, Olney students educated at Bletchley now have two legs to their journeys: Olney to Newport Pagnell or Central Milton Keynes, change, then on to Bletchley. Second, the pricing structure of the All-In-One MK under 19s bus card has changed. Previously, each bus trip cost 50p and now, following a change on 28th June, each trip costs half the adult fare, although ten trip and weekly tickets are available with All-In-One for £10. As background, it’s worth looking at the Olney-Bletchley journey in more detail. The All-In-One card price was originally 50p each way (one bus trip, 50p fixed fare) and now, as a result of both changes, is around £2 each way (two bus trips, half adult fare). However, since it’s possible to buy a weekly ticket, with All-In-One, for £10, that means £1 each way for a typical five day a week school/college commute, limiting the increase to just 100%. Given the change in the All-In-One pricing structure, the change in the #1 service and general fare increases, some confusion about what is the correct fare would be unsurprising. Further, and as always with journeys requiring a connection, a delay in the first bus results in a long wait for the next. Peter Viney also spoke on this topic, and it may be that the unreliability he reported has some connection with the 9th July MK Citizen news story “Arriva ‘caught out’ by lack of city bus drivers” – Arriva is recruiting, email recruitment@arriva.co.uk for info. Looking at the Olney-Newport Pagnell journey, which many Ousedale Sixth formers will be taking, the situation is clearer. It was originally 50p each way with All-In-One (one bus trip, 50p fixed fare) and is now around £1 each way (one bus trip, half adult fare). Given that some posts to the Olney Noticeboard Facebook page have reported up to £1.15 being charged for this trip, it again seems sensible to purchase the weekly or ten trip ticket, with All-In-One, for £10 to cover the usual five day a week school commute. This overall topic, including the ambiguity as to the correct fares, was discussed further later in the meeting. Ron Mihill Finally, Ron Mihill spoke about the poor state of the footpath around the Market Place, particularly between Tesco and Beans.

    Oakdown Crescent
    There’s been almost no progress since the last report, with Deidre Bethune reporting that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) had reassigned the person who was dealing with the issue and not informed OTC of who, if anyone, was dealing with it now. Peter Geary, a Ward Councillor for Olney, recommended OTC send a letter to MKC asking who was dealing with the issue now and that it be kept in the loop in future. He, along with other Councillors, was keen to see progress and to get a proposed scheme out for consultation.

    School transport costs
    The bus fare issue raised earlier by Lesley Weston was now discussed at length and, in summary, Peter Geary will take up any incorrect fare charging with MKC. He explained that the #1 bus service had been changed due to budget cuts, which had been fought over strongly, that being a major reason why the budget was not passed first time. Even with all that, £150,000 had still been cut from bus services, and this was one of the ramifications: Budgets had to balance. Finally, OTC will post details of how to complain about incorrect charging on its Facebook page.

    Additional pedestrian crossings at the Market Place
    Ron Mihill presented a proposal to make it easier for people to get to the Market Place on foot, regardless of which direction they’re coming from. It was for two new pedestrian crossings, one across each road at the Eastern end of the Market Place just West of where the roads join. Most Councillors seemed keen on this proposal, and Peter Geary suggested OTC nominate it for a small capital scheme – a way to find funding for the work. A few Councillors, for example Deidre Bethune, were not convinced there was a problem to solve.

    Library
    Liz Gifford gave a brief talk on MKC’s Libraries and Cultural Services Review. She felt libraries were part of the fabric of an area, a good place to meet and learn, and she was keen to see more community involvement with running them. The question was how to sustain them in the long term. While MKC was committed to keeping them open, what did that actually mean? For example, how many hours, at what times and run by how many staff?  Peter Geary was concerned about MKC’s ‘end game’ in terms of Olney Library, particularly because they’d previously had a plan to close it and he believed that may still be lurking in the background. Noting that the shared back office costs dominated Olney Library’s overall costs, he and Jeremy Rawlings felt that these costs were unusually high for Milton Keynes’ back office and that, as a result and given its location, Olney Library could likely get these shared services cheaper from Bedfordshire or Northamptonshire Councils. As background, it appeared that the reason for these costs being high was that, while shared Library services are usually provided on a County wide basis, here they are provided for Milton Keynes Borough which is a comparatively small geographical area and, thus, similar economies of scale are not achieved.

    Market Place CCTV
    After a long debate, Councillors voted by majority to install a permanent CCTV camera on the Market Place, as recommended by the Olney Neighbourhood Action Group (NAG) and Thames Valley Police (TVP). This will cost around £6,000 up front then £600 per year. It will be recorded continuously and monitored as required by TVP.

    Olney Town Colts FC clubhouse
    The Council gave its unanimous approval for Olney Town Colts FC to build its clubhouse on to the Northern end of the Olney Football Club building.

    Ousedale Olney annexe
    Joe Stacey had met with Sue Carbet of Ousedale School. OTC is being contacted by Ousedale’s planning consultants to discuss the possibility of expansion to cope with the expected additional housing in Olney. He noted that, clearly, this expansion was based on a long term look at capacity requirements because, currently, children were being bussed in from Bletchley to fill a surplus in the existing capacity.

    Pre School LED lights
    The lighting in the Pre School area of the Olney Centre needs replacing, and the Olney Centre Management Committee had recommended this be done with LED lighting, providing a yearly saving of around 35% (£126) compared with running the current lights. The choice of LED lighting was uncontroversial, but the fact that only one rather than the usual three quotes had been obtained for the work was less so. Peter Geary noted that OTC, as well as doing the right thing, must be seen to be doing the right thing and, as this view appeared to be shared more generally, the lights were approved along with a note of the need to obtain three quotes in future.

    Goosey track
    Ron Bull reported that the Fishing Club maintains a track for vehicles across the Goosey by periodically laying down hardcore and, as that soaks into the ground, laying more. This time round, as well as restoring the track, the start of an additional parking area had been laid also. After some discussion with Tony Evans about exactly whether this addition was or was not allowed, Steve Clark asked that Tony and Ron resolve the issue outside the meeting.

    Litter control
    Colin Rodden felt that the litter problem in Olney was getting worse. This was discussed, with ideas including a possible repeat of the community litter pick, which has worked well before, and posting on OTC’s Facebook page.

    East Street parking
    Tony Evans explained that the Recreations and Services Committee had recommended that the area on Nursery Field between East Street and the football pitch be used as a car park. The area would have gates at both ends, and would be opened for busy days only. Councillors approved this, paving the way for a full specification to be drawn up and the job to be put out to tender.

    Swimming Steps’ repair
    As reported before, the bottom Swimming Step is gradually subsiding, with a gap opening between it and the next step. The plan is to provide a long term fix for the problem by installing contiguous steel piling with timber capping, then pump out the water and fill the area behind the piling with concrete. This will be specified in detail and put out to tender.

    Market Place electrical points
    The Market Place currently has all its electrical outlets near the toilet block. The Council is investigating the provision of multiple points around the area, thus reducing the amount of cabling required on Market days and, in particular, improving safety due to fewer overhead cable runs being required on those days. Councillors voted to obtain quotes for this work.

    Duck and Raft Races
    Colin Rodden reported that the Duck Race had been fantastic, and Sally Pezaro that the Raft Race had been excellent. Regarding the Raft Race, she explained that people had been mentioning Floral Fiesta and how great it used to be. She felt there was potential to do more at this event and was keen to talk with the organisers.

    Bits’n’bobs
    By the time you read this, the Weston Road play area will have reopened. Also, Tony Evans reported that the most recent Farmers’ Market had attracted a record 32 stalls.

    Olney River Palooza
    As publicised on Facebook, and unrelated to Olney Duck and Raft Races, the Olney River Palooza is planned for 12:00 on Sunday 26th July. Councillors, not convinced that this would be a planned and safe event, were concerned about it. The Council planned to inform other interested parties, such as MKC, the Environment Agency and the Police, but otherwise felt powerless to act. Next Meeting - 7th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    There was no Olney Council report for August 2015


    Olney Council report for September 2015

    Public Participation
    Peter Gage Peter Gage drives a School minibus for Brocks and spoke of his safety concerns regarding parking around Olney Middle School when it closes at the end of each day. He explained that, at 3.10pm, it’s impossible to park near the School and the closest he can get requires that pupils cross Moores Hill unsupervised to reach his minibus. He asked if it’d be possible to have a parking spot near the School reserved for a short period each day to allow pupils to walk from the School to the bus without needing to cross the road. Sam Jacobs Sam Jacobs was last to speak in this slot. Following on from his well received post on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook page, Sam spoke about there being little to do for teenagers in Olney. His suggested solutions included sustainable sports facilities, a small skateboard park (think of that in the Buszy, Milton Keynes), a musical area where drums and amplified instruments could be played, and a safe basketball court.  This topic was covered further in the main part of the meeting.

    Tennis Club extension
    The Tennis Club wishes to build an extension, effectively a pergola, to the side of its clubhouse over the paved area to provide an undercover viewing area for the courts. Councillors appeared in favour of this, and the next step will be for the Club to see if planning permission is required.

    Play equipment for youngsters in Olney
    Steve Clark introduced this item explaining that, having seen Sam Jacobs’ post and Sally Pezaro’s response to it on Olney Noticeboard, Sam and Sally had been interviewed on air by BBC Three Counties Radio presenter Jonathan Vernon Smith. Sally asked why the skateboard ramp kept being covered in graffiti, for example whether it was because people disliked it. She also explained that, with land in Olney being expensive, it would be hard to get a building for music practice. In summary, she felt that a group of like-minded teenagers needed to get together to put forward their collective views, so all their views would be heard. Jeremy Rawlings provided some context. Around 15 years ago, there was a project to build a skate park in Olney. A piece of land around the same size as a tennis court was required and, at that time, the expected cost was around £18,000. The park was never built. An issue which would need to be considered for any new attempt is its location: It needs to be close to homes to allow ease of access, provide a safe environment and discourage vandalism, yet be far enough away not to upset people living nearby. He also explained that the Youth Centre is geared up to host music practice sessions, but that legalities mean that adults have to be present. That means, really, that parents need to get involved and that’s not always proved easy to achieve. He concluded by noting that, if the possible Community Asset Transfer (CAT) of the Youth Club to OTC does go ahead, the Council would have more influence over the services it provided. Steve Clark proposed that a working group of Councillors and children be set up. Sam thought this was a good idea.

    unknown
    Olney Skate Park Request

    Parking in Oakdown Crescent
    Following a site visit in July, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) has suggested that a possible solution would be to introduce a residents’ parking scheme in Oakdown Crescent, with parking in the affected bays being restricted to residents and visitors. It asked what Olney Town Council (OTC) thought of this, and whether it would make a Community Parking Scheme application to help fund the scheme. Peter Geary felt that the scheme would not work in isolation, and that funding was for MKC rather that OTC to find. Deidre Bethune felt frustrated that, with some progress having been made in June, the process now seemed to have moved back to square one. OTC will request that David Hall, of MKC, come and present the scheme to OTC.

    Westlands
    Steve Clark introduced this item, explaining that Westlands is being used illegally as a House In Multiple Occupation (HIMO). MKC is aware of this and is treading carefully with its response. Peter Geary explained that there are many illegal HIMOs across Milton Keynes Borough and that there’ve been no reports of antisocial behaviour from this one so far. Its previous use, a care home, suggests that safety there, for example the provision of fire doors, is probably ok. He noted that if MKC served an enforcement notice for the HIMO to be closed, the building owner could lodge an appeal which, should the Council lose, would effectively be an application for a HIMO. Noting that its use as a HIMO followed MKC’s rejection of the owner’s planning application to convert the building as flats, he speculated that maybe the owner was trying to annoy the Council. Finally, he explained that the best solution might be to talk with the owner to come to some agreement for an acceptable, sustainable use for the building. Colin Rodden asked if there was a time period for which it could operate unchallenged as a HIMO, after which this use would become legal. Peter replied that this limit was four years, but that it would not apply in this case because MKC, having already serviced a notice to elicit more information from the landlord, had already started action. OTC will write to MKC expressing its support for its action and requesting monthly updates.

    Events
    OTC will consult via its Facebook page to see if a local event should be held to celebrate the Queen’s 90th birthday, to coincide with the main celebrations being held on the weekend of 10th to 12th June 2016. The Olney Group will be holding Fireworks Night on Sunday 1st November. 

    Recreation Ground play area
    As reported a few months ago, MKC had applied to Biffa Waste Services for matched funding for improvements to be made to the Recreation Ground play area. This application had failed, but MKC had some spare play equipment, in good condition, which it now proposed to relocate to Olney at no cost to OTC. Tony Evans felt that the Council should ask MKC for a layout plan and timescale. Noting that OTC had been right not to consult early on the previously planned improvements, Peter Geary asked whether it should now consult on the new ones or whether it should just accept the equipment and not “look a gift horse in the mouth”. Steve Clark concluded this item, saying the Council would push MKC for a firm commitment on what they’d deliver and when.

    Youth Centre Community Asset Transfer
    OTC is considering applying to acquire the Youth Centre under the Community Asset Transfer (CAT) scheme. Introducing the topic, Jeremy Rawlings explained that the Youth Centre Committee and Local Scout Group had submitted a joint CAT bid for the Centre some time ago, but then had to pull out because the National Scouts would not support the application unless it was sole. Feeling that the Youth Centre was an important asset to the town, Jeremy asked if OTC would consider taking it on under the CAT scheme, the idea being that OTC would own the building and rent it to the Youth Centre and other groups. Tony Evans felt it was important to pursue this, as another organisation had previously shown an interest and its aims could be very different from those of the Council. Peter Geary agreed, saying that OTC should start to consider the transfer and, if it later decided that it shouldn’t go ahead, pull out of the process. In preparation, Jeremy Rawlings agreed to produce a business case for the building.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    The Market Place CCTV installation has stalled due to the local Police Constable having changed. MKC’s initial response to Ron Mihill’s proposal last month for additional pedestrian crossings on the Market Place was sceptical, as it felt there was already too much activity outside the row of shops near Costa Coffee.

    Elwyn Lack
    Elwyn Lack, Deputy Mayor of Olney some years ago, sadly passed away on 7th August 2015 aged 89. A minute’s silence was held for him, and concluded the meeting. Next Meeting - 5th October The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th October in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for October 2015

    Prior to the Meeting
    Prior to the meeting the members assembled for the annual Olney Town Council (OTC) official photograph so they were in their best bib and tucker and posh frocks. Some were even wearing clean jeans and t-shirt!

    Public Participation
    There were no residents wishing to speak at this month’s meeting but Peter Gage was present to check up on progress of the school minibus parking issue.

    Oakdown Crescent
    It would appear that no progress has been made on solutions to alleviate the parking problems since the site visit in July by officers of Milton Keynes Council (MKC). Deirdre Bethune said that Sue Warren had been trying to speak to David Hall of MKC on behalf of the residents but had been unable to make contact. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said he would investigate and report back.

    School minibus parking
    As reported last month in Public Participation, Peter Gage drives a school minibus for Brocks and spoke of his safety concerns regarding parking around Olney Middle School at the end of the day when he cannot park close to the school to pick up his passengers. This month a discussion took place as to what could be done to resolve the problem. Town Clerk Liam Costello wondered if a parking space could be found away from the school and a ‘walking bus’ implemented so that the students walk to it in a single group. Deirdre Bethune noted that this was what happened in the past when busses parked in Moores Hill and staff would escort the students to them and wondered why it had stopped. It was noted that parents very often park in the space reserved for the larger buses so there was no guarantee that the same thing would not happen in any space reserved for the minibus. Colin Rodden said that nationally some schools are training staff to give out parking violation tickets and wondered if MKC might consider implementing this. Peter Geary felt that it was unlikely that OMS staff would want to do this and also thought it unlikely that MKC would be able to get existing traffic wardens to attend regularly enough to make any difference. He suggested that the school should be encouraged to adopt a Walk to School scheme in order to change the culture of parents driving their children to school. Eventually it was agreed that the school Head was best placed to appeal to parents to obey the existing parking restrictions.

    Youth Centre Community Asset Transfer
    As reported last month OTC is considering applying to acquire the Youth Centre under the Community Asset Transfer (CAT) scheme, the idea being that OTC would own the building and rent it to the Youth Club and other groups as a community building, rather than just a Youth Centre. Jeremy Rawlings was actioned to put together a Business Case so that OTC is fully aware of the financial implications and any liabilities. As a precursor to this Jeremy presented the Income and Expenditure Account for last Financial Year, together with a list of regular club users and hirers. The main point to note, he said, was that currently the centre receives a grant from MKC of £13.7k which would be lost if the transfer goes ahead. He also noted that during the summer many hirers preferred to use the large playing field but also hired the building in case of inclement weather. Joe Stacey pointed out that the draft Neighbourhood Plan had earmarked land in this area for health and community use, which could include a new GP surgery. This started something of a heated discussion with some members saying that this was by no means a done deal and Jeremy said that Joe was the only person who seemed to think that it was. Joe reiterated the point that the Neighbourhood Plan had identified the need for additional surgery space and that the land in question would appear to fit the bill as a possible site as it was proposed to be for health and community use. Peter Geary observed that if the transfer of the building took place it would be on the basis of use solely as a youth centre and if OTC chose to use it for anything else then MKC might decide to ‘claw back’ some of its contribution to the transfer. In the end it was agreed to start the transfer process and, if it was later decided that it wasn’t financially viable, pull out of the process. 

    Planning gain from Sainsbury’s development
    Although the planning application process has not yet been completed OTC has been in discussion with MKC about how the Section 106 Developer Contribution might be spent. A Town Centre Improvement Fund of £90k is proposed, which would be used to offset the impact of the development on the Town Centre by providing improvements such as car parking, traffic improvements and physical and social infrastructure improvements. Peter Geary explained that the money would become available in phases and does not need to be spent all at once but OTC need to make plans now as to possible projects. Tony Evans suggested a public consultation to ask residents for suggestions and Mayor Steve Clark agreed but thought that clear limits need to be set in order to avoid the usual flood of swimming pool requests. A working party will be set up to progress. An additional sum of £20k is being proposed to provide real-time bus information displays at bus stops, which Deirdre Bethune thought a waste of money bearing in mind the poor bus service that Olney receives and also the fact that not all operators provide the necessary data. However, other members thought that it would be a useful facility.

    Wind and Solar Farms
    MKC is inviting comments on its draft Landscape Character and Landscape Sensitivity to Wind and Solar PV Developments document. The objective, it says, is to evaluate the Landscape Character Types and Landscape Character Areas of MK and identify particular areas which may have a greater or less capacity to accommodate such development, i.e. where to put them! The consultation period runs till 4th November but there will presumably be a delay before it becomes a policy. In June this year the government announced that onshore wind and solar farms would be excluded from the subsidy scheme from 1 April 2016, a year earlier than planned. Peter Geary said he believed that this would lead to no more planning applications being made from next April so members decided not to take part in the project.

    Odds and sods
    OTC’s proposal to provide match-day parking on the recreation ground between East Street and the football pitch has received a setback because the MKC planner has asked for a hedge to limit the visual impact from East Street. This would severely reduce the amount of parking spaces, making the scheme unworkable. The scheme to put CCTV cameras on the Market Place has stalled due to the retirement of PC Andy Perry. Susan Hughes from the Neighbourhood Action Group has not been able to get any interest in progressing it from anyone else at Thames Valley Police. The owner of the former Westlands care home has said that the current occupiers will be leaving by Christmas so MKC will not be taking action to stop it being used illegally as a House In Multiple Occupation (HIMO). OTC has agreed with this course of action so long as the owner complies. It was pointed out that the present occupiers had not caused any problems and were spending money in the town. Planning permission has been granted for Olney Town Colts FC to build their new club house and groundworks will soon commence. Colin Rodden reported that the illumined central reservation bollard by the Church Hall had been damaged for some time and wondered when MKC would get round to replacing it. Steve Clark said that all such bollards in MK are being replaced by the reflective knock down and spring up type so it would probably be replaced as part of that project. Next Meeting - 2nd November The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd November in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for November 2015

    Public Participation
    Susan Hughes There was only one resident wishing to speak at this month’s meeting. Susan Hughes reported, on behalf of the Neighbourhood Action Group (NAG), that she now had a contact within Thames Valley Police who will support the provision of CCTV in the Market Place and the scheme would now progress.

    Oakdown Crescent
    No progress has been made on solutions to alleviate the parking problems since the site visit in July by officers of Milton Keynes Council (MKC) but Rob Ward, Highways and Planning and Transport Business and Liaison Manager at MKC had suggested that Olney Town Council (OTC) put in a bid to the Community Parking Scheme when funding opens next year. A number of councillors expressed their frustration at this, with John Sharp asking how long it was going to take. Mayor Steve Clark replied that it had been 35 years already! Ward Councillor Peter Geary expressed the view that although Rob Ward’s approach was unacceptable, berating MKC officers would not help as OTC would need to work closely with them. That particular department is understaffed as many experienced people have left and OTC already has a number of ongoing issues, some of which could be considered ‘failures of service’. He said that the ward councillors would be meeting with the newly appointed Head of Department and suggested that other members of OTC should attend.

    School minibus parking
    Following recent OTC discussions about the parking problems at the Olney Middle School, Headteacher Glenn Young was present to introduce himself to the council and to give an update. He explained that his role does not end at the gate and is all about working with the community of which the school is part. The school is popular and oversubscribed and the parking problem is a consequence of this, since many parents need to drive their children to school from out of the town. He emphasised, however, that safety is his number one priority and he wanted to work with OTC to resolve the problem. Glenn agreed that there needed to be a dedicated area for school bus parking but did not see his staff becoming parking enforcers, rather they should be concentrating on teaching. He said there were currently no parking restrictions on the prow of the hill, but expressed concern that doing so might move the problem elsewhere. Deirdre Bethune reminded members that when Driftway had been opened there was a proposal to close off the top end of Yardley Road by the school. Could that be resurrected, she asked? Jeremy Rawlings said he had been against the original closure plan but was now reconsidering. He was concerned that it might make the parking problem worse and vehicles would then need to turn in the road to exit. In conclusion Glenn said he would try to find the percentage of children who currently walk to school and suggested a joint school and OTC letter to parents to impress the need for sensible parking.

    Cherry Fair
    Tim Haskell, Senior Warden at St Peter and St Paul’s church, was present to request that OTC grant permission for the Cherry fair to be held on The Glebe on 18th June 2016. Tim explained that traditionally the Cherry Fair had been held on the last weekend in June. In recent years attendances had been falling, partly due to clashes with other events in the town. These clashes, particularly BOTO, also had the effect of reducing the pool of volunteers who were able to help with the setting up and running of the event. Last year it had been necessary to move the date due to a longstanding wedding booking in the church. Even though the weather had been inclement the result had been that more helpers had been available and more people attended on the day. The council agreed to the request to hold the Cherry Fair on June 18th 2016.

    East Street Nursery pitch parking
    This is the proposal to provide additional match-day parking spaces behind the goal posts at the East Street end of the football pitch. As reported last month the scheme has received a setback because the MKC planning department has asked for a hedge to limit the visual impact from East Street. This would limit the parking spaces to a single row. They have now carried out a tree survey and identified a ‘no dig’ area to prevent root damage which would reduce the length of the bays to 4.4m from the standard size of 4.8m. It was pointed out that the particular trees do not have a Tree Preservation Order so OTC would be within their rights to simply remove the trees to solve the problem. Tony Evans was disappointed that MKC are not being supportive of OTC’s attempts to provide additional parking spaces and seemed to be putting obstacles in the way. Steve Clark pointed out that since the land belongs to OTC they could just lay some plastic paving grid and open the gate, if they were so minded, but they were being penalised for trying to do it properly. Peter Geary was of the opinion that the planning officers were just following policy by commenting on the proposals, which is what they are paid to do. He suggested continuing with the existing planning process as money had already been spent on drawing up the plans. It would not commit OTC to implementing them, he said.

    Plan MK: Vision for the future growth of Milton Keynes
    For details of the four options put forward in the plan see pages 26 and 27 of the November edition of The Phonebox. The option which would have a major impact on Olney is Option 3: One or more Satellite Settlements in the rural areas. Also impacted would be Sherington, North Crawley, Moulsoe, Hanslope and Castlethorpe. Some or all of these sites could be developed with between 5,000 and 10,000 new homes. Peter Geary opened the discussion by saying that he had been accused of being both pro and anti the plan, which was the most serious issue impacting the area for a generation. He said that the proposals had come out of a series of workshops held earlier in the year and very little feasibility had been carried out into any of them. Any such development would require a number of new bridges over the M1 and River Ouse, for which there was no government funding. He thought the proposals ‘do not stack up’ and wondered why the ‘impossible’ options had even been put forward instead of being dismissed. An additional 10,000 house for Olney was ‘crazy’. He suggested working with the other impacted villages to gain a collective view and provide a unified response. Steve Clark said that Olney has grown organically for 30 – 40 years so that newcomers had integrated into and felt part of the community. Jeremy Rawlings pointed out that there are times when it is almost impossible to get to Central MK and without major infrastructure improvement things could only get worse. Tony Evans asked where this left the emerging Olney Neighbourhood Plan?  The three month consultation period was due to commence on 9th November when the Planning Cabinet was expected to approve the publication of the options document. Mercury has since learnt that the cabinet did, indeed, approve the publication but that decision was subsequently ‘called in’ so will now be considered by the Executive Scrutiny Committee meaning a delay to the start of the consultation.

    Odds and sods
    As reported last month, planning permission has been granted for Olney Town Colts FC to build their new club house. OTC has posted notice of their intention to dispose of the land by way of a long term lease and the notice period has now expired with no comments being received.  Next Meeting - 7th December The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th December in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for December 2015

    Public Participation
    Francis Smith Francis Smith spoke on the subject of providing a Skate/BMX Park in Olney. This issue was discussed later in the meeting and is covered below.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Councillors had met with the Milton Keynes Council’s (MKC) Corporate Director for Place to discuss the lack of progress on the issue of parking in Oakdown Crescent. He’d promised an update on the situation but, the meeting having taken place only recently, this has not yet been forthcoming.

    Skate/BMX Park
    Colin Rodden, who along with Carl Clennett had been assisting Francis and friends with the proposal, introduced this topic. Four possible sites for the Park had been investigated – Barn Field, Johnson’s Field, the Recreation Ground and the Youth Club – and graded in terms of distance from where people live, distance from existing sports facilities, and ease and suitability for installation. Based on these criteria, the Recreation Ground had come out on top with around 50% more points than Johnson’s Field, its nearest competitor. Thus, the Recreation Ground is the only location being pursued for this proposal, the currently chosen position there being immediately South of the All Weather Surface – covering around half the often muddy area where BOTO places its marquee and Fireworks Night its fair and stalls. Resurfacing the existing All Weather Surface may also be included alongside the proposal. The cost of a new tarmac surface had been estimated at £18,000, allowing the usual mix of sports, for example football and basketball, to still be played there. Alternatively, Olney Football Club had expressed an interest in laying an artificial grass surface and feels it could likely raise the significant funding required to do so. However, if that option was chosen, use of the area would be for football only and it would likely be kept locked when not in use in order to protect the surface. The Sports Clubs have been asked for their views and, based on the subset of responses received so far, the results are positive with some questions about noise levels. Also, the topic has been posted on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook page and received positive responses. Not all parties contacted have yet responded, and further views will be sought.  Peter Geary was very positive about the proposal, his only concern being that Council Planning guidelines for the minimum allowed distance from the nearest residential property be followed. Tony Evans felt that any All Weather Surface resurfacing work should be separated from the Skate Park and, that being said, noted he’d prefer to continue with a tarmac surface as that was the most likely to keep the area well used. Steve Clark was also keen to split the projects, noting that he didn’t want to see both put at risk due to the larger amount of money that would have to be raised to complete them as a pair. Ron Bull noted that the Skate Park proposal would stand and fall by how much money the proposers could raise themselves – for example, from local businesses and individuals – which would need to be significant else the project would be a non starter. In summary, Councillors were broadly in favour of the proposal.

    Market Place CCTV
    After a delay caused primarily by personnel changes at Thames Valley Police, Olney Town Council (OTC) approved the purchase of the CCTV camera system for £5,500, with an annual running cost of £590, subject to confirmation that the system has the best available specification for the price.

    Tourism signage
    Summarising what was quite a long discussion, Councillors voted by majority to support having two signs, likely coloured brown as per regular Tourist Information signs, one at each entrance to Olney on the A509, carrying the wording ‘Welcome to Olney Home of Amazing Grace’. The notable abstention was from Peter Geary, who, while agreeing with the need for the signs and their wording, felt strongly that brown was an inappropriate colour.

    Plan:MK
    Plan:MK, one of whose options involves very significant housing development in Olney, is due to be consulted on shortly. As the plan has been reported extensively in the local press, it’s not covered in detail here. OTC, along with various other Parish Councils and individuals, had called in the decision to consult on the development options document. The reasons for this were that: • The consultation document was flawed because there was no check on the feasibility of the development options before it was proposed to go out for public consultation, a feasibility check being an essential part of the consultation process; • The process to produce the document was flawed in various ways, including that the workshops were poorly run and that the views of developers attending were over represented; • While the Local Plan, Plan:MK, follows a process for estimating housing demand over the next 10-15 years which is both rigorous and evidence based, the MK Futures 2050 Commission’s forecasts are neither, yet will, over time, override those in Plan:MK. Combining Plan:MK with the MK Futures 2050 Commission is a flawed use of the Local Plan process. The call-in was debated by the Executive Scrutiny Committee on 2nd December which, voting along party lines, decided to proceed with the consultation but with some changes. Principally, they will remove all references to specific rural areas and instead have a general option along the lines of ‘development in the rural area’. They also agreed that certain aspects of the initial consultation were flawed, specifically the communication of the process and the lack of representation at the vision workshops. Finally, they agreed there would be more engagement with rural Parishes and neighbouring Planning Authorities (e.g. Central Bedfordshire Council). But, the consultation will proceed. OTC and other nearby Parish Councils are considering clubbing together to take legal action as a group against MKC. Colin Rodden felt it was a sad day to see two public bodies suing each other, but that it was justified since MKC had not properly consulted with the Parish Councils. Chris Shaw asked what OTC’s mandate was to reject the plan – for example, should the Council poll local residents for their opinions? The resulting view, with which there was broad agreement, was that the option to add 10,000 houses to each of Olney, Sherington and Castlethorpe by 2050 was too obviously ludicrous to justify the expense of a public consultation. Overall, Councillors’ views were broadly summed up by Peter Geary, who noted that the Parish Councils had to let MKC know they were watching it on this issue, and that it should not be over-influenced by the developers. He felt this issue would take a lot of people’s time over the next few years. The Council voted unanimously to authorise £3K expenditure for legal services against MKC, and to hold funds and provide administrative support for these services on behalf of Olney and other smaller nearby Parish Councils, for example Castlethorpe and Sherington.

    Water bill
    The Council has received a water bill for £5,500, substantially more than the usual £500 per year. This appears to be caused by a substantial leak which occurred during the Summer in the pipe supplying the Tennis Club where it passes under one of the tennis courts. The leak has been addressed by running an alternative pipe from the tractor shed around the tennis courts to the Club house and, unlike the previous supply,  this one is metered albeit at the Club house end. Councillors will meet with the Tennis Club to decide how to meet the cost of the additional bill.

    (Not) giving blood
    The regular sessions run by the National Blood Service at the Youth Club for people to give blood have been stopped, apparently due to the team which organised them losing a member. Councillors decided to write to the Service asking it to reconsider, and to ask if Mark Lancaster, our local MP, would table a written question on the topic in Parliament.

    Events in 2016
    The Pancake race will take place on Tuesday 9th February, the Barn Field beacon will be lit for the Queen’s 90th birthday on Thursday 21st April, John Scarrott’s Fair will be in Olney from Wednesday 15th to Saturday 18th June, TOG has asked to hold Raft Race on Sunday 3rd July, BOTO will be held from Friday 8th to Sunday 10th July, and there’ll be a Retro Car Tour visiting the town on Wednesday 7th September. That lot should keep you busy.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    Dickens of a Christmas was thought to have been a very successful event. The Council may publish an article explaining who runs which parts of this pretty substantial undertaking and how it’s paid for. Ron Bull noted that, while the letter from Richard Pill in last month’s Phonebox Magazine implied that the Sainsbury’s planning application had been delayed indefinitely, this was not in fact the case and it was simply waiting on additional information being provided. He asked if OTC could refute the view, as some people had taken it seriously. Next Meeting - 4th January The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th January in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.
    ------

     
    Mercury's reports for 2016


    Olney Council report for January 2016

    Introduction
    There was a full house of members of the public at this month’s meeting, eager to have their say on the proposals by Milton Keynes Council (MKC) to close the Kitchener Day Centre for older people as part of its financial challenge.

    Public participation
    Four people spoke about the closure of the Kitchener Centre: Kathleen Wilson Kathleen Wilson said that Olney Town Council (OTC) had been involved in the building of the centre with money donated by Harry Kitchener. She said it enables service users to maintain their independence and that her husband attends two days a week. The proposal to relocate the service to a single centre in Milton Keynes was ill thought out and the centre is as essential a service to the town as the schools, baby clinics and doctor surgeries. We might all need it one day, she said. Keith Gould Keith Gould is a volunteer mini bus driver for the centre and said on a good day it takes him over two hours to collect and deliver clients to the centre. Sometimes it can take longer if carers have not got them ready. If the collection for the new centre started at the same time as now then the clients would spend so long getting to and from Milton Keynes that they would not have time for any activities once they got there. In an emotional plea he explained that his wife uses the centre, which provides respite for himself and he did not think he would be able to cope without it. Kevin Viney Kevin Viney said that the centre had proved to be a vital and local link for a very vulnerable group of people who often have no voice. They and their families value both the core and extra voluntary services such as outings and Christmas treats. To bus them through the rush hour into Milton Keynes would be both cruel and wrong, he said, particularly given that the centre had shown flexibility to live within its means following successive tight budgets. Tom Horne Tom Horne said his mother has been using the centre for the last four years and gives him and other carers the opportunity to get work done during this time. He would not like to see his mother spending two to three hours each way travelling on a bus as this would cause her even more confusion and probably shorten her life. The issue of the Kitchener Centre was discussed as an agenda item later in the meeting.

    Oakdown Crescent
    There has been no update from MKC on the matter of parking or poor state of the pavements. Sue Warren observing from the public area made it clear that she was very angry at the lack of progress and asked where the money had gone that MKC had allocated to a solution. The pavements are in a very dangerous state for the elderly residents, she said. Joe Stacey declared the situation to be ‘ludicrous’ and thought it was now time to start ‘throwing bricks’ (figuratively, no doubt) in order to get things moving. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that the MKC Chief Executive was aware of the situation and that there were reasons why it had not been progressed, which he was not prepared to discuss in the meeting, although constant staff changes was a contributory factor. He admitted that mistakes had been made which had slowed the process down but throwing bricks would not help. It was now time for OTC to work with MKC to ensure that the same mistakes were not made again.

    Youth Centre Community Asset Transfer
    OTC has applied to take ownership of the Youth Centre under the C.A.T. programme. The stage 1 process has completed and confirmation that OTC has met the eligibility criteria received. It will now move to Stage 2 and can hopefully be fast-tracked.

    MKC Budget Consultation
    As has been widely reported MKC need to make budget cuts of £21.7m in 2016/17 due to a combination of increasing demand for services and reduction in funding from Central Government. Council Tax will increase by the maximum permitted figure of 3.95%, meaning that the average band D property will pay £1206.06. A document listing 130 proposals, together with the likely impact and cost saving has been produced and comments are being invited from councils and members of the public. This document can be downloaded from the OTC website www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk by clicking on the link in the rolling Latest News menu. Peter Geary gave a brief outline of some of the proposals, including: Removing the warden from sheltered housing at Clifton Court; Closing the Kitchener Centre; Reduction of Bus subsidies, resulting in even fewer busses; Closure of some children’s play area; Replacing pink recycling sacks with reusable hessian sacks. It was agreed that councillors needed more time to look at the various proposals in detail before compiling a formal response.

    Plan:MK
    OTC are acting as the principle body in formulating a response to the proposals to build an additional 10,000 homes each in Olney, Sherington and Castlethorpe and Jeremy Rawlings reported that the group have appointed Shoosmiths as solicitors to represent them. The consultation will start on 13th January.

    Development adjacent to sewage works
    Last year MKC granted planning permission for a developer to build 30 new homes on land adjacent to the sewage works that previously only had permission for business (employment use). OTC objected on a number of grounds and Anglian Water commented that any development close to the pumping station would be subject to some noise and odour, suggesting a condition that development does not take place within 15 metres. However, this comment was not included in the MKC document recommending that permission be granted. OTC raised a complaint that the decision was based on flawed and incomplete information and should be overturned. A letter has been received from the MKC Head of Spatial Planning and Implementation partially upholding the complaint and apologising for the omission, but not agreeing to review the decision since he did not believe that a different conclusion would have been reached, even if the comment had been included. Members decided it would not be a good use of their funds to take this to the next level so reluctantly agreed to accept the partial victory.

    Kitchener Centre
    There are currently three centres in Milton Keynes providing day services for older people, all of which are working below capacity. Redwood in Bletchley is in a poor state of repair, Manor Road in Netherfield is reportedly ‘falling down’, while the Olney Kitchener Centre is around 10 years old and well maintained. The original proposal was to close all centres and relocate the service in a new centre to be built in Simpson. This was expected to achieve a saving of £200k but unsurprisingly caused a public outcry. MKC then put forward a second option of creating two geographical hubs by closing Redwood and Manor Road and relocating to the new Simpson Centre (the Southern hub) and retaining the Kitchener Centre and extending its catchment area (the Northern hub). This second option would also achieve a saving of £200k. A number of members of OTC had attended the MKC meeting where this proposal had been put forward and Ron Bull said he got the feeling that the MKC officers present knew they had made a mistake. Chris Shaw observed that it was a bad day if Olney could not look after its elderly residents. Peter Geary advised caution saying that although the second option had been put forward and was cost neutral, the budget consultation was still going ahead so it was not a done deal. Sally Pezaro asked if there were any plans to increase the capacity of the Kitchener Centre. Mayor Steve Clark explained that in February 2013 the centre was working at its full capacity of 15 people and had a waiting list. Dr Brian Partridge from Cobbs Garden Surgery had expressed concern at this situation and had suggested that consideration should be given to an extension of the building. Since then, Steve explained, there had been a ‘raising of the bar’ to qualify for its services and it was now operating below capacity.

    Town Meeting
    This year’s Town Meeting will take place on 12th May, after the OTC elections. It was agreed that this should be widely advertised in an attempt to persuade residents to attend and have their say.

    Next Meeting - 1st February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 1st February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for February 2020

    Public Participation
    Sue Warren Sue Warren spoke again on the subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent. She’d been speaking with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) about the possibility of introducing a permit parking scheme there. In order to be considered by MKC this would, amongst other criteria, require the support of over 70% of the properties in the Crescent. Sue felt this level of support would be achievable and said she would canvas opinions. Susan Hughes Susan Hughes spoke to report that, after nine years, the Olney Neighbourhood Action Group had ceased in its current form due to the withdrawal of support from MKC and, because of restructuring, Thames Valley Police. She explained that she was sad to see it go, but felt it had helped the town a great deal. She also thanked John Boardman for chairing its meetings, Liam Costello and Sandra Grummit (the Town and Deputy Town Clerks), and said she could not have wished for a better representative from Olney Town Council (OTC) than Rosemary Osborne. Steve Clark, on behalf of the Council, thanked Sue for the Group’s work.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Liam reported that he’d attended a site meeting in the Crescent, along with a new person at MKC who’d be in the job for only the next six months. While that doesn’t sound like a great start – the Mercury report from July 2015 noting stalled progress due to the person looking at the issue being reassigned without MKC telling OTC who, if anyone, was continuing with it – it is a step in the right direction and at least the length of his ‘stay’ is known. Peter Geary explained that a plan had been proposed: To make interim repairs addressing the worst of the uneven surface, to produce an options paper on which OTC would consult with residents, then to show the results to MKC who would decide what action to take.

    Circular Walk
    As reported before, a Circular Walk is being planned, and MKC has proposed that the section which runs parallel to and south of Weston Road alongside one of the streams be diverted to instead run in the same direction along the northern bank of the River Great Ouse. Tony Evans preferred this route as, with it being fenced, there was a degree of separation between walkers (and their dogs) and the nearby sheep. Peter Geary felt OTC should ask for it to be a permissive right of way, this being different from a public right of way in that, although anyone could use it, the Council could ban particular people from doing so if the need arose. As noted by Jeremy Rawlings, permissive rights of way are not shown on Ordnance Survey maps although, as Liam explained, good signage could partially negate this concern.

    Citizens Advice Bureau
    For the past few years, the Council has made a yearly payment to Citizens Advice Milton Keynes in order to provide an outreach service in Olney, amounting to four 45 minute appointments every fortnight. Citizens Advice has proposed leaving the amount unchanged this year, at £5,198. Councillors discussed this, the key points being that the sessions were, on the whole, fully booked but that less statistical information, for example the number of people helped, was available than in previous years. Councillors voted all in favour, bar two abstentions including one due to this lack of information, of making the payment to retain the service for  another year.

    Budget 2016-2017
    Based on a recommendation from the Finance Committee, Councillors voted unanimously to accept the proposed budget. Looking at the income side, the Council Tax Base – the equivalent number of Band D properties in the Parish paying Council Tax – has increased by 0.8%. But, the Council Tax Base Reduction Grant for Olney – a government grant given to Parish Councils to compensate them for the reduction in Council Tax Base due to various welfare changes – has been reducing every year and will eventually disappear. Looking at those issues, plus the predicted spend, OTC has increased its precept to £177,000, a 4.1% increase, resulting in it taking £68.54 per year from the illustrative Band D Council Tax, a 3.28% increase.

    Lavendon Road Section 106 requirements consultation
    Having previously declared an interest, Peter Geary and Ben Brock left the meeting for the duration of this item. This refers to a Planning Application to build 50 houses on the triangular parcel of land South of Lavendon Road and immediately South East of the Whirly Pit roundabout, stretching around half way to the river. Section 106 refers to a legal agreement between a Local Authority and a Developer, linked to planning permission and also known as a planning obligation. A new development can place extra pressure on local infrastructure, for example healthcare, and the agreement aims to balance that pressure with improvements to the surrounding area such that, where possible, the development will make a positive contribution to the local area and community. Liam started the discussion, noting that this was prior to planning permission being decided and that the estimated amount payable under Section 106 would be £985,220, equating to £19,704 per house. MKC had calculated this estimate in accordance with its Supplementary Planning Guidance, and were asking for comments on it, along with whether any additional projects or requirements were needed in order to make the development agreeable in planning terms. While this sounded a large figure, Deidre Bethune and Joe Stacey each noted that the money would go to MKC and that Olney wouldn’t get to see a lot of it, perhaps 25%, OTC effectively having to bid for local projects. A lengthy discussion followed, much of which centred on what OTC could, in principle and reality – which, the feeling appeared to be, may differ significantly – actually affect. Councillors agreed to respond noting the amount, showing a few illustrations of local projects and offering further information in due course. While not discussed during this meeting, on the same night, the Sainsbury’s Planning Application was rejected by MKC. This was for a number of reasons, but it’s worth noting that they included the supermarket site being outside the existing settlement boundary and in open countryside. This 50 house Application is outside but almost adjacent to that boundary and just over the road from the proposed Sainsbury’s site. If this Application is agreed, would the ‘open countryside’ reason for rejecting the Sainsbury’s one carry less weight?

    Plan:MK
    As reported before, Olney and other Parish Councils had won various concessions from MKC in terms of the content of the Plan, for example that the map showing satellite settlement ‘bubbles’ surrounding Olney and certain other nearby villages would be removed. MKC had released draft one of the document without making this change, then draft two with the ‘bubbles’ removed but the associated text continuing to state the names of these towns and villages, then finally draft three with those also removed. It was believed that one Council had already provided its response to the plan based on draft one. Olney and associated Parish Councils are arguing via Solicitors that the process has therefore been tainted, is flawed and should be withdrawn. A Solicitor’s letter has been written and, come the Public Examination some time 2016 – 2018, this will be mentioned. Peter Geary and other Councillors felt that option three, ‘one or more satellite settlements in the rural area’, would be a disaster wherever they were located, as it would separate people from their work and cause more travel, for example in and out of Milton Keynes via the already congested M1 crossings. He also noted that option four, ‘intensification and redevelopment of the urban area’, which had seemed attractive, meant building on various parcels of employment land within Milton Keynes, and that alternative land for employment must then be provided elsewhere, for example to the East of the M1. Councillors are keen to get the Plan:MK information out to the Public, and you’re much encouraged to read and respond to it. Please surf to this link www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/PlanMK.

    Purchase of new mower
    Councillors voted unanimously to spend £15,000 to purchase a new Kubota mower. This was interesting mainly because it highlighted a case where the usual recommendation that all purchases must go out to three tenders was, with reason, not followed. In summary, this was because all Kubota agents tend to charge remarkably similar prices, and it’s hard to  compare one dealer with another like-for-like when you consider location, standard of service, trust, etc.

    Town Meeting
    This year’s Town Meeting will be held on 12th May in the Olney Centre. Noting with irony that last year’s meeting was ‘our usual show of dynamic excitement’, Steve Clark asked for ideas to make it more interesting and worthwhile for people to attend. Councillors agreed with this sentiment and, in practice, these meetings tend to attract a tiny attendance unless a particular controversy is in progress at the time. For example, a few years back, issues surrounding Doff’s Field led to a good attendance. In order to attract more people, Councillors decided to provide drinks, including wine, to advertise the meeting more widely and to look into the possibility of providing some entertainment.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    A permanent CCTV camera has been installed covering the Market Place. The Recreation Ground play area improvements should be well underway or complete by the time this is published. The Council is getting a full condition report for the Youth Centre, as part of the process to decide whether it wishes to apply for the Centre under the Community Asset Transfer scheme. MKC is starting formal action against the owner of Westlands due to their use of the building outside planning consent, and the owner has submitted plans to convert it into flats. Next Meeting 7th March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for March 2016

    Introduction
    Mayor Steve Clark welcomed the newly appointed Deputy Clerk Debbie Eason to her first full council meeting.

    Public participation
    Sue Warren and Brian Rice were the two members of the public who wished to speak at this month’s meeting, both on the same subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent, but with widely opposing views. As this was a formal agenda item it will be covered under that item.

    Oakdown Crescent
    As reported last month, Sue Warren had consulted Milton Keynes Council (MKC) about the possibility of introducing a permit parking scheme there. In order to be considered by MKC this would, amongst other criteria, require the support of over 70% of the properties in the crescent. Sue said of the 16 properties, one was currently empty but the remaining 15 occupants were in favour of the scheme. Once the three ward councillors had expressed support for the scheme then MKC would write to the residents to fill out a survey. Sue said that some of them were worried about filling out the necessary forms but she would provide assistance. On other matters, she said that the pot holes still hadn’t been filled in but the seat had been painted, which was a waste of time and money as no one used it so it might as well have been removed. Brian Rice then spoke against the suggestion in what became a very heated exchange. Brian lives in a house near to Oakdown Crescent and has no parking outside his house so parks in the crescent. He said that if the scheme went ahead he would not only mount a legal objection but would also drive a JCB through ‘that wall’ (which presumably blocks vehicular access to his own property). He thought the scheme was a waste of time for just 16 people and Sue was ‘lucky’ that two residents had died over Christmas as he knew they were against it. He said he was sick and tired of being made out to be the bad guy and was disgusted by what was happening. Colin Rodden attempted to calm the situation but was shouted down by Brian. At this point Steve Clark ordered Brian to stop speaking and sit down as he was not prepared to have councillors spoken to in that way. Brian then left the meeting. Sue said she felt personally threatened by what had happened. Once the atmosphere had returned to normal Colin Rodden said that if the scheme went ahead the council needed to recognise that it would move the parking problem elsewhere. Deirdre Bethune agreed but said it was important to do one thing at a time. John Boardman said that there needs to be a second stage and consideration needs to be given to demolishing the nearby garages. Peter Geary said that MKC must recognise that the parking permit scheme would only be stage one and the overall issue must not be allowed to disappear from their agenda. Deirdre agreed that the poor state of the pavements and pot holes pose a danger to young people, let alone the elderly.

    Leave of Absence
    Under the council’s Standing Orders if a member has not attended a meeting for six months they cease to be a councillor, unless they are granted a Leave of Absence. Councillor John Smail has not attended a meeting since 15th September due to illness and has requested Leave of Absence up to the forthcoming elections in May. This was agreed.

    Plan:MK
    For detailed information on the proposals read Jeremy Rawlings’ article on page 16 of the March Phonebox. OTC, along with a number of other Parish Councils, has issued a formal legal challenge to the consultation document which was issued by MKC in January. The basis of this objection was, amongst other things, that there was no evidence of the population growth claims and there had been no consultation with neighbouring authorities. MKC have now responded rejecting the claim. Jeremy said that the parishes will not raise any more legal objections at this stage but pointed out that the leaflet delivered to all houses in the borough contains a number of errors. This will doubtless be a subject for discussion at this year’s town meeting on April 14th.
     

    The Olney Centre
    Deirdre Bethune said that three quotes had been obtained for installing UPVC or Aluminium double glazed windows in the Olney Centre. She said she was not happy with the quality of what was being offered for such and old building and had already contacted another company which specialised in heritage type glazing. Advice as to what might be required as part of the planning process will be sought from MKC planners before any decision is taken. Following the recent spate of break-ins quotes are being obtained for an upgrade of the Centre intruder alarm.

    Neighbourhood Plan
    Joe Stacey presented the consultation version of the plan to the council and it was agreed that it could now move on to the pre-submission stage. The plan will shortly be available on line and sets out a vision for development in Olney up until 2031 and will eventually be the subject of a local referendum. Joe thanked the many volunteers who had spent a great deal of time in preparing the plan.

    Circular Walk
    At last month’s meeting it was decided to create a permissive right of way for the section that currently runs parallel to and South of Weston Road alongside one of the streams but would be diverted to instead run in the same direction along the Northern bank of the River Great Ouse. Advice had been obtained from Rosie Armstrong, MKC Assistant Rights of Way Officer. Rosie said that a permissive path is one which the landowner permits the public to use, with the intention that it should not become a public right of way. The permission can be granted for a stated period and Rosie said that MKC would expect this to be in excess of 10 years since they would be investing time, effort and expense into it. She suggested that a public right of way would be the better option and this was passed on a vote by the council.

    Riverside right of way
    OTC is claiming a right of way along the top of Doff’s Field from Austen Avenue to Clifton Bridge and a Public Enquiry will be held on May 19th. MKC have asked OTC for suitable residents to give evidence at the enquiry. John Boardman expressed his surprise at this as considerable evidence had been collected and documented on a previous occasion, although it had not all been made public. MKC should have access to this documentation, he said. 

    Youth Centre Community Asset Transfer
    The council is considering taking ownership of the Youth Centre as part of a C.A.T. as happened last year with the Olney Centre. An inspection of the state of the building had been carried out by a firm of chartered surveyors which reported that the building is in a generally poor state, having been maintained to minimum standards. The estimate for the repairs was in the region of £150k, although the report carried a number of caveats. Tony Evans thought the estimate unreliable and Joe Stacey suggested it might need a full structural survey. The main issue seemed to be with the flat roofs which require complete stripping and re-covering, but there are a number of other problems which need to be fixed. John Boardman said OTC needed to form a medium to long term business plan to decide how the building would be used and how it could be made to pay its way. Steve Clark was of the opinion that MKC should be asked how much they are prepared to contribute to the repairs, presumably because the poor state of the building is due to their neglect. Colin Rodden reminded the council that the Youth Centre was not just the building but also the considerably sized plot of land which might be of interest to a developer. Peter Geary said that if OTC did go ahead with the purchase it would have to continue to be used for its original purpose, otherwise MKC could buy it back for £1. The only exception could be if it was sold and the resulting funds used to directly finance a replacement.

    Odds and Sods
    OTC has been approached by local companies Profit Rocket and SSHY Creative Ltd with a view to producing an updated town map to be displayed in the Market Place bus stop and also leaflets. Joe Stacey agreed that the current map is out of date but said he would like to know what the council would be getting for their money with examples of previous work. The former Westlands is no longer being used as a House In Multiple Occupation and planning permission has been submitted for conversion to flats. Rosemary Osbourne reported that funding had now been obtain for heritage signs announcing Olney as the home of Amazing Grace to be placed at the entrances to the town. Colin Rodden expressed his frustration that MKC Development Control Committee had refused planning permission for the new Sainsbury’s, against advice from its own officers. For information, the committee had been tied on the vote so retiring chairman Brian White had used his casting vote to vote against, based on the environmental impacts to the surrounding countryside and also the impact on local shops. Peter Geary said his feeling was that Sainsbury’s would appeal at a cost of about £200k to the council tax payers

    Town Meeting
    This year’s Town Meeting will now be held on 14th April in the Olney Centre, not 12th May, as previously advertised. Cheese and wine will be available afterwards. Next Meeting - 4th April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for April 2016

    Public Participation
    The Public area was packed for this meeting, with the vast majority wishing to speak about Oakdown Crescent. This took a while so it’s covered first, followed by the issues raised by the few who spoke about anything else. Sue Warren Sue Warren, first to speak, noted that there were continuing parking problems in the Crescent and that the potholes remained, still to be filled in. She asked Councillors to ‘carry on the fight’ after the local elections. Elizabeth White spoke next. She’s lived for 25 years in one of the ‘landlocked’ houses just behind Oakdown Crescent, her mother lived in the Crescent until her death last year, and her husband is registered disabled. Noting the ‘knock on’ effect on nearby parking if a Residents’ Parking Scheme was introduced in the Crescent, she questioned how those with disabled family were meant to get to the ‘landlocked’ houses.  Nick Taylor Nearby resident of 15 years Nick Taylor spoke next, explaining that he’d only rarely experienced parking problems and that, if there was really a problem to solve, part of the solution could be to improve the surface in Oakdown Crescent and mark out parking bays there. Noting that Sue Warren’s offer to help residents fill in forms (those for the forthcoming consultation Milton Keynes Council (MKC) had planned regarding the proposed Residents’ Parking Scheme) was ‘not entirely appropriate’, he said he generally had a good relationship with residents of the Crescent and that people needed not to get carried away or emotional.  Ian Scott Ian Scott, a Weston Road resident, spoke next, wholeheartedly agreeing with Nick’s views, and noting that the proposed Residents’ Parking Scheme would simply move the parking problem elsewhere.  Julia Scott Last on this topic, Julia Scott spoke briefly, saying that she was aware it was unfair for her and others to clog up parking spaces in Oakdown Crescent, but they had no choice. Carl Clennet Carl Clennet spoke about the proposal for a Skateboard Park. The first preferred location, between the All Weather Surface and the Tennis Courts, had seen objections from the Tennis Club and The Olney Group (TOG). With the Recreation Ground seeming comfortably the best choice, the current preferred location is to site the Park in place of the zip wire, moving the wire elsewhere, hopefully not far away. He concluded by thanking the Recreation and Services Committee for its help, and noting that the Park would be a benefit to the community as a whole. Andrew Leicester Andrew Leicester spoke last. He lives in Near Town Gardens, and a lorry associated with the electrical works being performed near the allotments had damaged his wall and nearby protection post. While noting that discussions with the company involved were amicable, he explained that this was at least the fifth time where damage had occurred due to lorry traffic in the road, and asked if a sign could be erected to warn large vehicle drivers of the issue.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Now on to the main meeting, Brian Rice intervened before the Oakdown Crescent item began, handing a petition, presumably against the proposed Residents’ Parking Scheme, to Councillors. He went on to say that he had been upset by Sue Warren’s ‘hurtful defamatory remarks’ at the previous meeting, for example her saying that he was threatening her. He had contacted the Phonebox Magazine to express his views about the way the meeting had been reported, and stated that he’d never physically or verbally accost anyone in Olney. Elizabeth White also spoke, stressing that this issue was not personal. For a minority of the Public present, this was an emotional and spirited part of the meeting. It was not easy to watch and required Steve Clark, for the second meeting in a row, to intervene strongly as Chair to silence them, restore order and allow calm, logical discussion. Deidre Bethune, noting that this issue will (and surely by now has) ‘run and run’, asked if MKC could at least fix the potholes in the Crescent as it had said it would, as they made it a ‘dangerous place to live’. Peter Geary explained the story. In 1968, the houses in Oakdown Crescent and those ‘landlocked’ houses behind, were owned by Newport Pagnell Rural District Council. It sent a letter to its Weston Road tenants saying that, if they parked in the Crescent, they’d lose their tenancy. However, nowadays no Court would enforce such a rule so it’s become irrelevant. He thanked the members of the Public present for their proposed solutions to the problem. For the last few years, Olney Town Council (OTC) had accepted that there was a parking problem in the Crescent, but realised it could only be addressed in parallel with the provision of more parking in the area – perhaps on the site of the existing garages, on land near 102 Weston Road or by allowing more on-street parking nearby. He stressed that the proposed Residents’ Parking Scheme would not happen on its own, MKC having ‘put a brake on it’, and that the Councils would work to  understand the problem and try, together with affected residents, to solve it in a ‘holistic’ way. This last sentence much reduced the tension in the room, as most of those in the Public area relaxed visibly, with various saying ‘thank you’. If only, Mercury reflected, the format of the meeting had allowed this point to be made at its start.

    Skateboard Park
    The Recreation and Services committee had, at its last meeting, unanimously agreed to recommend to full Council that ‘subject to a suitable new site for the zip wire being identified on the Recreation Ground and approved, the committee agreed to the current zip wire site as the best one for a Skateboard Park’. There ensued a brief discussion, with Peter Geary suggesting that OTC have a pre-planning talk with the Planning Officer to discuss the most likely sites, thus uncovering any potential problems early on. Colin Rodden noted that the Cricket Club wasn’t keen on the zip wire site, preferring instead that between the All Weather Surface and Tennis Courts. John Boardman felt that, based on the Committee’s recommendation, those working towards the Skateboard Park should start raising funds towards seeing it realised, while Sally Pezaro was concerned about the ethics of raising money before the site was certain. Councillors voted unanimously to accept the Committee’s recommendation.

    Plan:MK
    The Council had been preparing its response to the Plan:MK Strategic Development Directions Consultation form, essentially 20 questions designed to gauge its views. The response was tweaked a little during this meeting, before Councillors agreed it was good to send.

    Youth Centre Community Asset Transfer (CAT)
    In the previous meeting, it was explained that an inspection of the building had found it in a generally poor state, having been maintained by MKC to minimum standards. It estimated repairs in the region of £150k. Much of the discussion was similar to last month’s, so just the new points are covered here. Jeremy Rawlings noted that the Youth Centre has around £30k in its coffers, and John Boardman that the building had outlived the era of its current use so a new approach was needed. The possibility, as contained in the draft Olney Neighbourhood Plan, of some of the Centre’s land being used for a larger Doctors Surgery was also mentioned. In summary, while many Councillors are clearly worried about taking on the building, the Council is continuing with the CAT process on the bases that it can pull out at any time and that, in terms of who pays for the building to be repaired, the Council’s leverage with MKC can only increase as the process continues.

    Swimming Steps
    As reported before, the Council had paid for a professional specification to be drawn up for the work required to make good the wide crack near the bottom of the Swimming Steps. Three quotations had been received to do the work and, following a short debate, the lowest was chosen. The work should be completed before Riverfest, where the raft racers exit the river up these steps, on Sunday 3rd July.

    Bits ’n’ bobs
    The brown information signs discussed in previous meetings are now up. It was noted that their wording, ‘Welcome to Olney, Home of Amazing Grace’, had attracted a Photoshopped alternative, posted in the Olney Noticeboard Facebook group and worded ‘Welcome to Olney, Home of Sainsbury’s and Moaning’. Ron Bull explained that preparations for this year’s hanging baskets had started, with them now being available to sponsor. Peter Geary noted that Thames Valley Police had offered to spend a day in Olney to advise people on how to security-harden their houses. He suggested it would be good to have them in the Olney Centre on the same day as the local elections. Next Meeting - 9th May The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 9th May in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Annual Town Meeting

    Introduction
    Olney Town Council (OTC) hosts a yearly town meeting which provides an opportunity for members of the Public to come along to find out what the Council, and other local groups, have been doing. Attendance at these meetings has been sporadic, ranging from very high in years when controversial items were forward in people’s minds to near zero in others. This year, with a second Sainsbury’s Planning Application ongoing and Plan:MK progressing, there are at least two controversial items and, whether due to them, the usual interesting reports or, just perhaps, the recently introduced free cheese and wine, it was pretty busy with around 40 people all told. This small article gives you a taste of what went on.

    Mayor
    Steve Clark is not standing for Mayor of OTC this year, leaving the way open for a new Mayor to be elected at the next full Council meeting on Monday 9th May.

    Sainsbury’s Planning Application
    This was discussed during Steve Clark’s Planning Committee presentation. In summary, the first Sainsbury’s Application was not opposed by OTC, which had the right to recommend refusal but instead was in favour, was recommended for acceptance by Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Officers but refused by their Development Control Committee. Sainsbury’s has since  submitted a revised Application with additional parking spaces, a limit of 15% on the sales area which can be used for non food items, and an agreement that the store would not include any non-retail concession space. If this second Application is refused, Sainsbury’s would likely appeal, putting MKC’s Officers, who had previously recommended acceptance, in the unenviable position of having to stand up in Court explaining why the Council had been right to refuse it. An appeal seems non ideal because, if Sainsbury’s was to win it, MKC would have to pay the court costs, and the Planning Gain associated with the Application may be reduced.

    Bits ’n’ bobs
    The Plan:MK Action Group is a set of Parish Councils including Olney which has banded together to fight the option within Plan:MK to build satellite towns around certain towns and villages, Olney included, in northern rural Milton Keynes Borough. A representative attended this meeting and gave a good summary of the current position. This is quite a tale and has all been covered before by the Phonebox, both in OTC and Mercury articles, so is not covered further here. If you’re concerned about large scale local development and want to know more, Google for “Plan:MK”. Andy Hipkin of Thames Valley Police reported that, this year, there’d been 45 (19 last year) burglaries in Olney, around half domestic, 14 (29) thefts of or from motor vehicles, 16 (20) assaults including those without injury but none classed as grievous bodily harm or worse, 18 (31) counts of shoplifting and 3 (4) sexual offences. The Police, currently low on Officers in this area, are recruiting to replace this shortfall. The Cowper and Newton Museum had a good year, and is aiming to make itself more self sufficient in order to ensure its long term viability. The Newport Pagnell and Olney Lions Club has around 18 members, is doing well but would welcome more – Google for “Olney Lions” if you can help. The Olney Group is also doing well, planning to significantly increase the range and size of entertainments and attractions at this year’s Riverfest, the new name for Raft Race.


    Olney Council report for May 2016

    The First Meeting
    The first meeting of the Council Year is known as The Annual Meeting of Olney Town Council (OTC), not to be confused with the Annual Town Meeting, and is largely given over to administrative functions, such as electing a new Mayor and Deputy Mayor, reviewing membership of sub-committees and reviewing standing orders and financial regulations. Before the start of the formal proceedings Mayor Steve Clark welcomed Councillor John Smail back to the chamber after his recent illness. John thanked Steve and said he’d be passing the hat round later!

    Public Participation
    As is usual recently, this section was entirely devoted to the issue of parking in Oakdown Crescent and Sue Warren was the only person wishing to speak.  Sue Warren Sue pointed out that the minutes of last month’s meeting were incorrect as they stated that Elizabeth White’s mother currently lives in the crescent when she in fact died last year. She pointed out that, contrary to the belief of Milton Keynes Council’s (MKC) Highways Department, the footpaths still have not been repaired and if any resident has a fall, there will be a huge compensation claim. She then asked Ward Councillor Peter Geary why the money that had been ring-fenced for a solution last year was no longer available and why, despite a request under the Freedom of Information Act, he had not told her the reason for the delay. Although the matter was an agenda item later in the meeting Peter chose to answer the question at this stage. He said that the money is still available but the reason that things had not progressed was because the ‘water was getting murkier and murkier’ and events at last month’s OTC meeting had set things back considerably. MKC officers would be looking for a consensus in order to progress any scheme and it was obvious in this case that there is not one. It will be necessary to work together as a community to find a solution, he said. Sue said that MKC had suggested a residents parking scheme which had been supported by the residents and was progressing but when it was discussed at the March OTC meeting other people had come out of the woodwork and stopped it. Clearly frustrated, Peter said that was not the case. The other parties had contacted officers at MKC six to nine months ago, when the resident’s scheme was first suggested, and as a result the officers had stopped it as there was obviously no consensus. Sue said she thought Peter was being unsympathetic but he responded that he was not anti the scheme and was on record as having successfully supported similar schemes elsewhere, where there had been a consensus.

    Election of Mayor
    Steve Clark, having been mayor for the past five years, had previously announced his intention not to seek re-election. He thanked everybody for their support during his time in office, particularly Deputy Mayor Jeremy Rawlings and his daughter Tamsin for their assistance. He then invited nominations for the new mayor and Jeremy, being the only nomination, was elected unopposed. Steve handed over the chain of office and Jeremy took his seat at head of the table. Ron Bull was the only nomination for Deputy Mayor and was also elected unopposed.

    Co-option to fill vacancies
    There were insufficient numbers of people wishing to stand for election to OTC this time so no election was necessary. All those who registered were elected unopposed but three existing members John Sharp, Ben Brock and Chris Shaw had stood down. Under these circumstances the council can co-opt eligible residents to fill the remaining spaces. Deirdre Bethune was concerned that the vacancies had not been widely advertised and said that the normal course of events would be to hold a full council meeting prior to advertising the vacancies. Town Clerk Liam Costello said that there was a statutory duty to fill the posts within 35 days of the election and there had been advertisements on the MKC website, the OTC website and posted up on the Town Council noticeboard. Ron Bull shared Deirdre’s concern that there were only three applicants for three posts. Rosemary Osbourne said that normally all applicants would be required to give a presentation to the council in order that members could judge their suitability. Tony Evans was of the opinion that it would be ridiculous to delay as everybody in the town was aware that the entire council was up for re-election, having been notified of the forthcoming election which was subsequently not required. Deirdre proposed that the co-options be delayed till the next meeting but this was narrowly defeated in a vote, so all applicants were co-opted on to the council. Although not strictly necessary, each co-optee was invited to give a brief statement about themselves. Desmond Eley said he was a Chartered Quantity Surveyor and had been a resident of Olney for over 40 years. His Father, the late Bert Eley was a past Mayor of Milton Keynes and had been an Honorary Alderman. Heléna Newbold, a nurse by profession, explained she had been an Olney resident for 17 years, had served as a Middle School governor and is the manager at the Kitchener Centre. Martine Stoffels is a Consultant Psychiatrist and has been a resident for three years. All three then took their places at the council table. 

    Oakdown Crescent
    Liam Costello said he had been working on a consultation document which would shortly be sent out to impacted residents in Weston Road, The Pyghtle Weston Road, and Oakdown Crescent. It would include a questionnaire to identify where the residents currently park and how many cars there are in each household. Colin Rodden said any scheme would have a knock-on effect to other areas, such as Chantry Rise, and thought it should be more widely circulated as part of the consultation. Peter Geary repeated his oft expressed opinion that any solution will move the problem on elsewhere unless additional parking spaces are provided. He said he was being publicly criticised for being negative and as a ward councillor had a choice on what he wants to be involved with. He could decide to withdraw and have nothing more to do with Oakdown Crescent, he said. Ron Bull said he thought that Peter had been very balanced in a climate that hasn’t been balanced. Jeremy Rawlings and Colin Rodden expressed similar support.

    Neighbourhood Plan
    Joe Stacey reported that there had been very few comments on the draft plan and the drop-in session had had a low attendance. He said things really needed to get moving and progress made between meetings. One of the barriers, he said was that the Highways Department of MKC still seemed to be in disarray and he was not getting the required level of support. Peter Geary said that a new Service Director had been appointed, who came with a very good track record, so things should improve. The draft plan is available at olneyplan.com

    Sainsbury’s withdrawal of planning application
    As everybody knows by now, Sainsbury’s have withdrawn their application for a supermarket in Olney, citing the refusal of planning permission and the uncertain outcome of an appeal as the main reasons. Ron Bull suggested that perhaps there was an anti-Olney feeling in MKC, quoting a number of instances where MKC planners had gone against the advice of OTC. OTC, MKC planning officers and 84% of respondents to a survey had supported the application yet it had been turned down on the vote of one MKC Councillor, Brian White, who had since retired, he said. He felt that Brian should be held to account for his decision. Colin Rodden agreed, saying there had not been much evidence of partnership with MK, where the MK Partnership was concerned. Jeremy Rawlings said he hadn’t bothered to attend the meeting as a member of the public as he thought it was a foregone conclusion that the application would be passed. Steve Clark said that whatever exceptionally good grounds for the appeal may have existed, Sainsbury’s had decided to withdraw and that was the end of the matter. Deirdre Bethune said it was quite possible that the building might not have gone ahead even if the application was approved, owing to Sainsbury’s current financial situation. There then followed a discussion around the need for OTC to work much more closely with MKC in order for them to understand the requirements of local communities.  For information, the application was refused by a majority vote of the MKC Development Control Committee, not just the chairman’s casting vote. The reasons for refusal were proposed by Brian White and passed by his chairman’s casting vote. The reasons were: 1. There is a parking shortfall, which will be displaced outside the boundary, 2. There is an impact on the Surrounding Countryside, Contrary to Policy S10, and, 3. That there is an impact on the non-retail part of Olney Town Centre as a consequence of the 30% reduction to trade in the food-stores.

    Disturbance at the Bull
    This item had originally been placed on the agenda to discuss the recent disturbance which had resulted in a large-scale fight spilling out on to the High Street and Market Place. However, since then the building had been badly damaged by fire and was now closed. Steve Clark proposed that discussion be widened to cover the current state of the building. He said the feeling was that what on earth have Charles Wells, the owners, done to allow the building to get into such a decrepit state. It was not that long ago that the Bull and its managers played a very active role in the community and it should be a flagship of the Charles Well’s empire. The decisions that have been made and the clientele attracted had now driven the whole establishment downhill. He said he would like a meeting with Charles Wells at a reasonably high level to find out what their plans are. They have promised major refurbishment in 2017, but have been saying that for years, he said. Deirdre Bethune was concerned that the resolution could drag on some time, as the Saracen’s Head next door had also been extensively damaged. What Risk Assessment had been done into allowing a wood burning pizza van into the courtyard, she wondered. Peter Geary said OTC should offer to work with the brewery in order to assist them with whatever plans they have.

    Odds and Sods
    Progress on the circular footpath continues and discussions are underway with the land owner about a right of way to run along the north bank of the river opposite Goosey Island. The landowner has expressed a preference to sell a small piece of land and a discussion took place as to whether the purchase price plus legal feels would be value for money, as it is mostly under water. Work on repairing the bathing steps at the bottom of the recreation ground has now commenced. The hearing loop is now installed and working in the council chamber. Colin Rodden asked if the latest data from the environmental monitoring station outside the Church Hall could be obtained. Next Meeting - 6th June The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th June in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for June 2016

    Public Participation
    Sue Warren As has become the norm, Sue Warren spoke on the subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent. She noted with some regret that Peter Geary had decided to ‘distance himself’ from this issue and that her emails to the other Ward Councillors had, thus far, gone unanswered.

    Multi Academy Trust
    Olney Infant Academy and Olney Middle School have proposed to convert to a Multi Academy Trust with Two Mile Ash and various other Schools. Jeremy Rawlings, previously Chairman of Governors at the Infant Academy, noted that the Multi Academy Trust is the Government’s preferred way of sharing expertise and that, over time, Schools may be forced to join such Trusts. Given that, he felt it was better for the Olney Schools to build this relationship now with Schools they know and like, rather than being forced later to link with other Schools. Councillors agreed to write a letter supporting this change.

    Oakdown Crescent
    A consultation document issued by Olney Town Council (OTC) had been sent to residents of the Crescent and nearby roads and, thus far, attracted 34 responses, around a third of the 101 properties to which it was delivered. The aims are to assess the parking issues and to seek residents’ views on possible improvements. The document outlined a possible phased approach to address the problems: In Phase one, parking in the Crescent would be reconfigured with bays marked out either around three edges of the main square (Option A) or in a single block in its middle (Option B). Some of these bays could be dedicated to carers and emergency vehicles, and some to a residents parking scheme for the properties in the Crescent. Phase two would involve demolishing the rented garages and redeveloping the area to provide parking for up to 16 vehicles. Phase three would be to resurface the track off Dagnall Road to provide better use of the available parking space, including the area adjacent to 102 Weston Road. Finally, Phase four would review nearby parking restrictions in an attempt to provide additional parking on Weston Road. Analysing the responses and giving approximate numbers, 50% felt there was sufficient parking available for their needs, 60% felt the document had identified all the issues, yet only 40% felt it identified all the solutions, 60% preferred Option B and, finally, around 80% would support the suggested phased approach. After a brief discussion, Councillors decided to ask Milton Keynes Council (MKC) to begin implementing Phase one Option B, and to send it a summary of the consultation responses.

    unknown
    Parking in Oakdown Crescent


    Lavendon Road Section 106 Requirements Consultation

    Section 106 is a planning obligation under which developers pay money to Councils in order to mitigate the negative impacts of their development work. While there’s much variation in how locally and on what the money must be spent, typical examples include children’s play parks and increasing the capacity of local Doctors’ Surgeries. It was being discussed today because the recently refused application to develop 50 homes to the South of Lavendon Road has been resubmitted, leading MKC to ask OTC for its views on how, if this application was successful, the resulting money should be spent. It’s worth noting that OTC’s influence here will be somewhat limited. Joe Stacey, the Councillor who’s primarily been driving the Neighbourhood plan, was clearly frustrated as, when he’d previously sent a questionnaire to all Councillors asking for their views on how the Plan should drive the Council’s response to consultations just like this, he’d received just two responses. The questionnaire will be re-sent and, very likely, a good number of responses received this time round. David Hosking, one of Olney’s Ward Councillors, felt that Parishes and small towns tended to get a raw deal from Section 106, and that Councillors should go through the consultation, item by item, challenging each one. He stated that it was a negotiation and OTC needed to negotiate harder.

    Dickens of a Christmas
    Following an earlier suggestion, the Dickens of a Christmas Committee has been looking into closing the A509 for the event. This is clearly not a trivial task and the quote from Ringway, MKC’s approved contractor, to implement the diversion was £800. The idea continues to be discussed.

    Council audit
    The Council has just comfortably passed its latest internal audit. Deidre Bethune congratulated Liam Costello and Debbie Eason, the Town Clerk and his deputy. The accounts will be available for public inspection from 13th June to 22nd July.

    Markets
    The pizza outlet at the Thursday Market has decided to take up a pitch in London instead, so will no longer be attending Olney’s Market. Councillors voted by a majority to have a Belgian Fries van occupy the vacant pitch. Perhaps already missing the pizza, Councillors approved the Italian Market to return on Sunday 16th October.

    One Stop deliveries
    As discussed before, and as covered extensively in various posts on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook page, there is ongoing concern about lorries delivering to One Stop on the High Street parking on the zig-zag lines near the crossing. It was noted that, while PCSOs can issue a fine of only up to £30 for this offence, Police Officers can issue a fine of up to £1,000 plus driving licence points. This safety concern will be discussed at the next Council meeting.

    St Peter & St Paul churchyard wall
    The old stone wall of St Peter and St Paul’s churchyard is deteriorating and in need of repair. The wall is MKC’s responsibility, but OTC has received a letter asking it to contribute towards the repair. Tony Evans, noting that MKC has been looking after the churchyard since 1994, felt the wall was unsafe and carried the danger of a rock falling on a vehicle or, worse, a person. He asked if a site visit could be arranged to show MKC the problem. Peter Geary felt that this letter broke protocol in that individual MKC officers shouldn’t write directly to Parish Councils and that, as a result, OTC should reply to a person higher in the MKC management structure in order to progress the matter.

    WEEE and textiles bank
    MKC has asked if it can place a Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and textiles bank in the car park to the rear of the Library on West Street. Councillors were concerned about the location, and a small group will visit various possible sites in the town to see if a more suitable one can be suggested for a three month trial of the bank.

    Swimming Steps
    As reported before, the Swimming Steps are in the process of being repaired. Due to some recent spells of heavy rain, the works are taking longer than expected, but should still be completed before Riverfest, due to take place on Sunday 3rd July. Next Meeting - 4th July The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th July in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for July 2016

    Public Participation
    No members of the public wished to speak in the public participation slot this month.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Following the recent public consultation on the thorny issue of parking, Deirdre Bethune and Town Clerk Liam Costello had presented Olney Town Council’s (OTC) report to Milton Keynes Council (MKC). There being no OTC meeting in August, an update will be given at the September meeting.

    unknown
    Oakdown Crescent, Olney


    Refusal of permission for 50 Houses on Lavendon Road

    MKC planners have refused permission for 50 houses to be built on land opposite the ‘Sainsbury’s site’ based on a number of points: ● The proposed access of a mini roundabout close to the bend in the road was not considered safe ● There was no sustainable drainage scheme included ● The applicant had failed to demonstrate that the scheme would not place a burden on or have an adverse impact on infrastructure, education and leisure facilities. The applicant has lodged an appeal against the decision which will now be dealt with by the Secretary of State. The council decided to concur with the reasons given by MKC for refusal but Steve Clark noted that the applicant had probably assumed that the Sainsbury’s development would go ahead and an extra spur could be built from their access roundabout.

    Community Skate Park Update
    Tony Summerscales attended with Committee members Francis and Tom to present a report on the current state of the project. Tony circulated a plan which showed the location of the proposed ramp in the position currently occupied by the Zip Wire. He said that the proposed structure would be lower than the existing ramp on Johnsons Field and would blend in well with the surrounding landscape. He explained that the project was still in the early stages but the committee were looking at three possibilities for a build partner, emphasising that the tender process will go through due diligence. The first fundraising event had taken place at the recent Riverfest where £178 had been raised. The next steps would be to produce a confident business plan to take to potential sponsors in the town and to seek a firm financial commitment from OTC. There then followed a discussion about how OTC might be able to assist with the funding. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings suggested Section 106 commonly known as Planning Gain which developers pay to secure planning permission. Peter Geary observed that funding could come from the Parish Partnership or Community Foundation, but would need to be applied for. If necessary it could be ‘forward funded’ from OTC reserves, he said. Helena Newbold said that some banks were prepared to match fund local projects so long as they are a charitable trust (which the skateboard committee currently isn’t). Tony said he didn’t want to lose the local interest and momentum gained from Riverfest and was concerned that the OTC Finance Committee was not due to meet again until October. It was agreed that an extra meeting of the Finance Committee would take place in order to discuss possible assistance with funding for the project.

    Riverbank footpath Carey Way to Clifton ‘Planks’
    There has long been doubt about the official status of the footpath that runs from Carey Way and along the riverbank to the bridge known as ‘The Planks’ at Clifton Reynes. The section that has been the main cause of discussion runs from Carey Way around Doff’s Field, which is now owned by the Rugby Club. In an attempt to clarify the situation MKC submitted an order to modify the definitive map by adding the footpath, thereby making it an official right of way. A local public enquiry was held in May, led by an inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. The report has now been published refusing to grant MKC the order. An order can be made if there is reasonable evidence that a right of way exists but a higher standard of proof is required to confirm it, based on the balance of probability that it has been used by the public on foot for a period of 20 years. In this case it is presumed to have been dedicated as a public footpath unless there is sufficient evidence that there was no intention on the part of the landowner to permit public use. The supposed path has been diverted over the years and ownership of Doff’s Field has changed hands a number of times since Dorothy ‘Doff’ Kitchener passed away. The inspector decided that status of the route was brought into question in 2002 with the first change of ownership so decided to examine the claimed public use for the 20 year period from 1982 to 2002. MKC produced written evidence from 59 Olney residents supporting the claim that they had enjoyed uninterrupted access along the route, some from as far back as 1938. However, none of them were called to give evidence in person to the enquiry. Olney Rugby Football Club were the objectors to the order and their Counsel called nine witnesses to appear in person to support the assertion that a post and wire fence and a five-bar gate with barbed wire along the top were in place during that period which would have required forcible entry to the field. As none of the supporters were present to answer questions under cross examination the inspector concluded that their evidence was outweighed by that delivered verbally at the enquiry and concluded that the order should not be confirmed. This was obviously a great disappointment to OTC and Ward Councillor Peter Geary said they needed to learn from the mistakes that had been made but there was no appeal against the decision. Steve Clark suggested that representatives of the Rugby Club be asked to state the clubs reason for the objection at the next Joint User Group meeting.

    Merchant Navy Day
    The council have received a letter from Seafarers UK informing them that September 3rd is Merchant Navy Day in recognition of the sacrifices made during the two World Wars, but also the vital part that the Merchant Navy plays in modern day commerce. OTC has agreed to purchase two Red Ensign flags to be flown in the Market Place and Olney Centre on September 3rd.

    Odds and Sods
    Due to the recent heavy rain, work has had to stop on repair of the bathing steps, but a temporary platform was put in place for the Riverfest raft race. Work will recommence soon. Councillors had been invited to a presentation by Charles Wells to show off their plans for the revamped Bull, following the recent fire. All were very impressed and a public exhibition is due to be held at the end of July. Peter Geary noted that the work would probably not start until the New Year, due to the complex planning requirements of a listed building. The street lamps in the High Street have reached the end of their life and need replacing. It is likely that they will be replaced with standard galvanised columns. Colin Rodden noted that the previous days Riverfest had been a huge success and thanked those involved in the organisation. Martine Stoffels suggested the use of digital signs at the entrance of the town to prevent some of the fly posting which currently takes place for local events. The Recs and Services committee will consider. Assistant Town Clerk Debbie Eason will henceforth be known as the Deputy Town Clerk Next Meeting - 5th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for August 2016

    There was no meeting in August 2016 of the Council

    unknown
    Olney


    Olney Council report for September 2016

    Public Participation
    Richard Hillier Richard Hillier spoke first, noting that the steps near the Co-op were dangerous due to a broken paving slab. Jeremy Rawlings and Steve Clark gave some background, noting that the ownership of the steps was unknown, although they appeared to belong to Milton Keynes Council or the Co-op. Councillors appeared sympathetic with this issue, and Jeremy noted that he’d reply later to Richard with further information. Sue Warren Sue Warren spoke on the long-running topic of parking in Oakdown Crescent, this time a parked car needing to be moved in order to allow an ambulance to drive out of the Crescent. She also stated that various carers visiting people in the Crescent have formally complained to their managers about the parking situation. Martin Allen Martin Allen spoke about the litter problem on the Recreation Ground, suggesting the Council create a litter picking unit. This idea will be put to the Recreations and Services Committee. John Perkins Finally in this section, John Perkins spoke about the ongoing problem of delivery vehicles stopping on the High Street and thus slowing or blocking traffic. He felt that the A509 causes difficulty for Olney citing excessive speed, weight of traffic and injuries. He asked if Olney Town Council (OTC) had prepared an action plan to improve the situation. Covered by various Councillors, and in previous Mercury articles, the idea of de-priming the A509 was discussed briefly but is not easy, as the Highways Agency controls priming and such a change would have effects for miles around. Also, the lack of a bypass, a subject omitted from the Neighbourhood Plan because it may otherwise have dominated it, was noted as a related issue. The topic was discussed later in the meeting.

    Parking in Oakdown Crescent
    Councillors will shortly be meeting with MKC to get feedback on this issue and push again for action. Peter Geary suggested that OTC follow up with the Ambulance Service because, if a report had been filed on the incident, it would be useful to inform MKC of the fact.

    A509 congestion caused by lorry deliveries
    Various ways to improve the situation were discussed, including the provision of loading bays (though many would be required) and asking shops to cone off an area when deliveries were expected. Joe Stacey felt that increasing the width of the road by realigning the kerbs at certain key points, such as that near One Stop, would help greatly. Peter Geary noted that the problem was almost insoluble and that the kerb realignment idea had been presented around eight years ago but, admittedly as part of a set of traffic ideas, met with huge opposition and so was not progressed. Councillors decided first to approach certain key shops and, out of goodwill, ask for their help (e.g. using smaller delivery vehicles) and, if that didn’t work, to look again at the kerb realignment idea.

    unknown
    A lorry 


    Barnfield

    Barnfield has been surveyed and is believed worthy of Local Wildlife Site status. Buckinghamshire County Council has contacted OTC to ask its permission for the field to be presented to a selection panel and thus have the chance of gaining this status. Councillors were broadly in favour of giving this permission, but wanted to understand all the implications first. A quick review of the paperwork suggests that the aims of this status are to encourage continued good land management and provide advice. OTC will invite a representative to the next Recreations and Services Committee in order to learn more.

    Skateboard Park and zip wire
    As reported before, the zip wire will need to be relocated if the proposed Skateboard Park goes ahead. Although measurements first need to be taken and approval sought from MKC, it’s likely the wire’s new site would be between the children’s play area and Doff’s Field.

    Recreation Ground toilets
    The sewerage system which serves the Tennis, Bowls and Football Clubs, public toilets and Council workshop runs under the roadway from the Bowls Club to the Football Club dugout, then through the adjacent private land to connect to the main Anglian Water system. For a good while now it’s been prone to blocking, and the Recreations and Services Committee voted to appoint a drainage consultant to perform a CCTV survey of the system and recommend solutions to this problem.

    Future direction of Local Services
    Ron Bull, along with Councillors from other local Parishes, attended a MKC meeting covering this topic. The basic premise was the increasing social care MKC needs to provide is much reducing its ability to spend on non-statutory local services such as grass cutting. For example, it was stated as near certain that MKC would not pay for this in three years’ time. It was also stated that a similar principle would apply to other services including play areas, dog bins, etc. The suggested solution was for OTC to increase its precept and take on the work itself. Based on the example of how Swindon is handling a similar scenario, it might lead to a Council Tax increase of £75 per year for a Band D property. Peter Geary, who is a Ward Councillor, explained that the underlying funding problem was real, but felt that the presenter of the meeting had overplayed the issue slightly. For example, MKC had just extended its grass cutting contract until 2023, so was unlikely to stop cutting grass any time soon. He felt OTC should push for a Service Level Agreement with MKC so both sides knew where they stood.

    Street lights
    The street lights along the High Street are standard columns, each fitted with an embellishment kit and a different top. Periodically, MKC perform ‘topple tests’ on them to ensure safety. The current embellishment kits were gifted to the town and, if any lamppost needs replacing, MKC would pay for the column but it’s likely that OTC would have to pay for the new embellishment kits and, if they can’t be reused, tops.

    Next Meeting - 3rd October The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd October in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.

    unknown
    A lorry 


    Olney Council report for October 2016

    Oakdown Crescent
    A small group from Olney Town Council (OTC) met with their colleagues from Milton Keynes to discuss the ongoing problem with parking in Oakdown Crescent. A two tier approach is to be taken: First, there will be a residents’ consultation to gauge views on a permit parking scheme for the Crescent. Second, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) will try to allocate enough money to create an organised parking layout, likely with cars in the middle of the Crescent. Peter Geary questioned whether, while the improvement in parking layout would help, the permit parking scheme would make much difference. This was because, once you’d allocated one permit per Oakdown Crescent and landlocked Weston Road households, plus one each for visitors, you’d overwhelm the parking capacity in the Crescent. Steve Clark suggested allocating Oakdown Crescent households two permits (fixed plus visitor) and landlocked Weston Road residents one fixed permit. Councillors decided to endorse the consultation. Is this, finally, a move towards at least a partial solution?

    Street lights
    As reported before, the condition of the street lights on the High Street is deteriorating. A structural survey has been conducted and, due to a combination of age, rot caused by dogs peeing near the base of the posts and the increased wind resistance caused by excessive ‘extras’ attached to the posts, all approx. 78 of them will be replaced between January and March next year. The replacements will be LED lit, appropriate for the area, for example black, and similar but not identical to the current posts. They’ll allow the Christmas lights and hanging baskets to be mounted, but the other signage that is kept will be moved to new posts sited nearby.

    Steps near Co-op and Oxfam
    Following on from Richard Hillier’s question last month, OTC is working towards fixing the steps leading down from the Co-op car park to Oxfam. In spite of looking back over old maps, OTC is little nearer discovering who owns them. In a pragmatic move, the Council will seek advice and approximate cost for a bricklayer to fix the problem. However, there was a concern that, should it have the work carried out, it may lead to the Council then assuming responsibility for the steps. It was also noted that it would be hard to get anyone to admit to owning them, due to the ongoing maintenance work that would entail. The Council will write to the Co-op, the company felt most likely to be the owner, asking for a donation towards the work.

    A509 congestion caused by lorry deliveries
    This topic was raised at last month’s meeting, and Liam Costello had arranged a meeting with One Stop in order to see if, for example, they could arrange deliveries by smaller vehicles. Councillors discussed the issue for a while, Martine Stoffels being keen to have representatives from MKC come to see the problem first hand and for Olney Councillors to try thrashing out a solution with them while there. The Council will ask MKC if their representatives can attend.

    Barnfield
    Barnfield has been surveyed and is believed worthy of Local Wildlife Site status. Councillors have decided to give permission for the field to be presented to the selection panel and thus have the chance of gaining this status.

    unknown
    The Barnfield

    Johnson’s Field zip wire
    The zip wire on Johnson’s Field, currently partially dismantled, is in need of significant work to restore it to working order. It’s unclear whether MKC will decide to perform this work or to remove the zip wire completely, regarding it as having reached end of life.

    unknown
    Johnson's Field Zip Wire

    Neighbourhood Planning
    Joe Stacey reported that Historical England, a consultee on the process of deciding residential and commercial development sites, has requested that an Environmental Assessment be performed. MKC is thus considering reversing its previous tack that one would not be required. Councillors were against this request, Helena Newbold noting that only three or four Neighbourhood Plans in the area had conducted this Assessment, with Newport Pagnell having won an award for their Plan without doing so. The Council will write to MKC asking them to override this Historical England request. As background, a Strategic Environmental Assessment is required where a development plan, such as a Neighbourhood Plan, is being prepared which is likely to have significant environmental effects. Environmental effects include those on heritage, habitat and the environment. Its purposes are to identify these possible effects and use them to inform the choices made in plan preparation. To perform an Assessment, a detailed statutory process would have to be followed.

    Changes to MKC planning delegation
    MKC is attempting to reduce the number of Planning Applications placed before its Development Control Committee (DCC) and Development Control Panel (DCP) by deciding more strictly which should instead have been determined by its officers under delegated powers. Their analysis shows that the highest single trigger for applications to be considered by committee was from Town and Parish Councils yet, in most such cases, those Councils did not send a representative to the subsequent meeting to argue their case. The next most significant trigger was the number of representations from members of the Public and, with this being based purely on a threshold and with no triaging of the acceptability or policy compliance of the applications, often resulted in perfectly acceptable applications being agreed anyway after needless additional consideration by committee. The proposed changes are that speakers’ rights at both the DCC and the DCP be amended to: • Allow the Ward Councillor to speak without having to declare ‘Objection’ or ‘Support’; • Remove the ‘Right to Reply’ requirement and simply allow the Applicant or Agent to speak in support of their application, irrespective of the recommendation or objections received, for three minutes. • Reduce the numbers of speakers objecting to a scheme to one, three-minute slot per application; • Allow members of the public to speak in support of an application on the same basis as those objecting to an application with one, three-minute slot per application. These proposals are open to informal consultation and, as such, OTC is invited to respond with its view. After some discussion, Peter Geary suggested the Council write to MKC to suggest a longer speaking time for more members of the Public to object, and similar for the Town and Parish Councils though, having objected, they must then speak at the resulting meeting. Peter will work with Liam to compose a suitably worded letter. Thank you to Liam Costello for providing the above list of changes. This is quite a detailed issue and, for further information, of which there is much, surf to http://bit.ly/2e4YsFe where you can view all the information from the meeting in which it was discussed. OTC will not be  the only Councillor or Council to object, as viewing the Collated Late Papers link on that page shows clearly.

    Hanging Baskets
    After a good display this year, the Hanging Baskets are now past their best and should have been taken down by the time you read this article. Next Meeting - 7th November The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th November in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for November 2016

    Public Participation
    Sue Warren First to speak in this section was Sue Warren on behalf of the Oakdown Crescent residents. She thanked the council for their efforts in the recent meeting with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) but expressed concern that the funding for the proposed residents’ parking scheme and changes to the parking layout was not currently available, since she was under the impression that it had been ring-fenced. This matter was an agenda item later on in the meeting. Gill Behari Next to speak was Gill Behari, owner of Leo Antiques in the Market Place who presented a petition requesting that the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) be relocated from the Market Place to the recreation ground, signed by 75% of businesses in the centre of the town. Gill said that the event had grown from the original one day event featuring Olney food providers and there were now food stalls occupying the roads and pavements around the Market Place. The roads and car park were now closed for almost three days, disrupting normal business practices resulting in loss of earnings for many retailers. Residents and visitors, particularly the disabled, have great difficulty in parking she said. Many of the shops have to close their doors due to food smells and deafening music and shop keepers had complained of finding people sleeping in their doorways, as well as vomit and general drinking detritus. The council had been due to discuss the request for next year’s event to be held, but decided to defer the decision pending further discussions.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Town Clerk Liam Costello reported that there was actually nothing to report at present, as MKC is yet to complete the consultation with the residents regarding the parking scheme.

    Community Skate Park
    This section was introduced by Councillor Colin Rodden who requested a commitment for financial support from OTC towards the total cost, expected to be in the region of £75k, so that the fundraising committee could approach local businesses for funding. Tony Summerscales was present with three young members of the committee. Tony explained that £145 had been raised from a stall at Riverfest but a firm commitment was required from Olney Town Council (OTC) in order to start the planning process, engage suppliers, and seek additional funding. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings reminded members that they had previously discussed using money obtained by Section 106 ‘planning gain’ for the project which was not currently available but could be ‘forward funded’. Liam Costello said that the proposed housing development in East Street would generate £33k and the Lavendon Road development £111k. However, the next Finance Committee meeting was not due till January. Tony was keen to move things forward, explaining that they wanted to start building in March 2017 so that the project was completed before the summer and not to disrupt the normal use of the play area and even a month’s delay would jeopardise that. Ron Bull suggested that if OTC was genuinely committed to supporting the skate park then it should provide the funding regardless, but Ward Councillor Peter Geary was adamant that the money must come from Section 106, otherwise it would have to come from the precept (the amount of Council Tax that MKC gives back to OTC to run services). He was 98% certain that the money would be made available, he said. Joe Stacey proposed that the anticipated £33k from the East Street development be earmarked to support the scheme and a vote taken which was passed unanimously. After the vote Tony Evans reminded members that the Recs and Services Committee had agreed to the location of the skate park, subject to relocation of the existing zip wire. It was possible that moving the zip wire might cause or identify damage which would need additional funding, he said. Also the play equipment on Johnsons field was due to be revamped and that would take a significant chunk of future Section 106 funds.

    High Street streetlights
    As reported previously, the existing lamp standards have reached the end of their life and are due to be replaced by MKC. There was concern that the replacements would be basic and functional, rather than aesthetically pleasing, but two designs have been submitted which are similar to the existing ones. OTC decided to opt for the designs produced by Holophane. It is expected that the full cost will be met by MKC with no contribution necessary from OTC

    Olney Wine Bar – license application
    Olney Wine Bar and Brasserie Ltd are owners of the Wine Bar and the next door premises, Cross Keys House, and have recently obtained planning permission to knock through the existing internal walls on the ground and first floors in order to link the two. The existing Wine Bar license covers opening hours, sale of alcohol, and music and dance all with slightly different timings. A new application has been made for the combined buildings which attempts to standardise the hours for the permitted activities although the finishing hours for the music is later than currently permitted. The nearby residents have expressed concern about the extended hours and OTC has formally raised an objection. A member of the council will attend the meeting of the MKC Licensing Committee on November 22nd to present their case.

    Changes to MKC planning delegation
    As reported extensively last month MKC is attempting to reduce the number of Planning Applications placed before its Development Control Committee (DCC) and Development Control Panel (DCP) by deciding more strictly which should instead have been determined by its officers under delegated powers. A survey has been sent to all parish and town councils for them to express their opinion of the proposed changes and identify what aspects of the planning process they consider most important. There was some concern at the ‘tick in box’ nature of the survey, since the importance of the various aspects and elements would vary from case to case and simple ranking was not appropriate.

    Devolved Landscape Maintenance
    Three years ago OTC agreed to take on responsibility for landscape maintenance from MKC, which covers litter picking, grass cutting and play area maintenance. In order to fund this additional work OTC received a grant from MKC. Due to the financial crisis MKC has had to cut £111m from its current budget, needs to find £20m next year and a further £60m by 2020. In view of this it proposes to cut the previously agreed grant for Devolved Landscape Service for the next financial year by a third. Peter Geary questioned what incentive is there for local councils to accept devolved services if this is the way they are treated. Liam Costello said that some council were proposing to raise the precept to cover the funding gap but Peter said The Council Taxpayer was already paying for the service and should not have to pay again through the precept. What would MKC do if a parish refused to fund the work, he wondered. Would it just not get done?

    BT removal of public payphones
    BT has informed MKC of its intention to remove 65 public payphones including all three in Olney, none of which are contained in the traditional red ‘heritage’ kiosks. The letter states that payphone use has declined by over 90% in the last decade and with 98% of the UK having either 3G or 4G coverage the use will continue to diminish. The phones in Olney which will be removed are:
    • Market Place – 101 calls in the year to 19/09/2016 • Outside Amaya Dartmouth Road – 58 calls in the year to 19/09/2016 • Junction of Dagnall/Weston Road – 0 calls in the year to 19/09/2016
    The council decided to raise no objections to the proposal, but Peter Geary said there should be a proviso that all the kiosks must be removed and the area made good, rather than just leaving them without being maintained.

    Barnfield
    As reported last month Barnfield is being considered for Local Wildlife Site status. Tony Evans reported that in order to promote the growth of wild flowers the long grass had been cut and removed and thanked groundsman John Nichols for his hard work.

    Olney IndieGo Collective Festival
    Local musician Ian Roberts has contacted the council seeking support for the IndieGo Collective, which is a charity set up to help fund children’s music and drama lessons in Olney and the surrounding area. The plan is to have a weekend of fundraising, starting on Friday 21st July with art exhibitions, poetry reading and artistic workshops in the town, with comedy and acoustic music in many of the bars and restaurants. On Saturday 22nd July there would be a concert on a field of the recreation ground with a main outside stage and an acoustic stage inside a marquee featuring some ‘household names’. The event would relocate to the Market Place on Sunday 23rd for similar  entertainment.  There was some concern that the event might be over ambitious and the recreation ground would not be suitable for such an event, particular as there is an existing parking problem in the area and it would probably bring in people from outside town. Steve Clark wondered if it might be more suited to Emberton Park where parking and camping is available.

    unknown
    The IndieGo Collective

    Steps near Co-op and Oxfam
    MKC have investigated the somewhat vague ownership of the steps, which are in a bad condition, and concluded that they belong to the Co-op. They have written to the Co-op informing them of this decision and instructing them to carry out the necessary repairs.

    Public Art in Olney
    Members of OTC have had a meeting with the Public Art Officer for MKC, who was described as ‘very enthusiastic’. Steve Clark pointed out that every Section 106 ‘planning gain’ grant contains an element of funding intended for public art, none of which had ever been spent in Olney. Tony Evans noted that the state of wicker pancake figures continues to decline and reminded members that they had discussed having them remade in metal.

    Odds and Sods
    OTC has agreed to fund the provision of one member of staff for the library for a further year at eight hours per week. The five gang grass mower has reached its end of life and will be used for spares for the three gang mower. A new Trimax mower will be purchased for £15.5k which will be cheaper to service.  A chain of beacons is to be lit across the country on 11th November 2018 to mark the end of the First World War. OTC plan to light the beacon on Barnfield as part of this act of remembrance. Des Eley passed on his thanks to TOG who organised the recent fireworks display, saying that he thought it was the best yet. Sally Pezaro, who is also a member of TOG reported that once again the recreation ground toilets backed up and became blocked and the gentlemen’s toilet light was not working. Tony Evans admitted that the toilets are ‘an embarrassment’. Steve Clark noted that the recently published Olney guide contained many errors and requested that assistance be given with the proof reading when the next edition is submitted for approval. The guide is published by a private company called Local Authority publishing and not OTC. Next Meeting - 5th December The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th December in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for December 2016

    Public Participation
    There was a full house of nearly 30 members of the public present for this month’s meeting. Most of these were there to support the application to hold the Big Olney Food Festival next year and as this was an item on the formal agenda will be covered there. Kevin Viney First to speak was Kevin Viney on the subject of the proposal to replace the existing street lights in the High Street which have come to the end of their life. He was concerned that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) prefers to use LED bulbs in replacement schemes but the proposed supplier, Holophane, do not provide this option on the ‘Woburn’ lamp post style. If the next most energy efficient option of fluorescent lamps was used this would produce a ‘morgue’ like white light as opposed to the warm yellow sodium lights which are used at present, he said. There is growing evidence that white light can disturb circadian brain rhythms and inhibit normal sleep patterns and many of the street lights are close to first floor windows in a residential area. He requested that Olney Town Council (OTC) write to MKC and asks for the traditional Metal Halide or Sodium lamps to be used instead. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings agreed to make representations to MKC.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Representing the residents, Christine Platt reported that someone had been ‘seen with a tape measure’ in the crescent recently, indicating that there may be some progress on the residents’ parking scheme. Town Clerk Liam Costello said that consultation with residents on the parking scheme was due to start that week. The recent budget announcement from MKC meant there would be a charge of £50 per annum for each vehicle registered with residents’ parking schemes across the borough, he said.

    Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF)
    At last month’s meeting Gill Behari, owner of Leo Antiques in the Market Place, presented a petition requesting that the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) be relocated from the Market Place to the recreation ground.  Prior to this month’s meeting Sam McCallum, chair of voluntary group Olney Events who run BOFF, submitted a letter of response to the council. In the letter Sam explained the context of BOFF saying that originally it had been a one day event run by the chamber of Trade to showcases local food and drink retailers and entertainers. The aim was to cover the cost of the event and support the Chamber of Trade, which for many years it did. In 2014 the running of the event transferred to the newly created organisation, Olney Events, who since then had donated over £16,000 to local good causes and purchased the 150 artificial Christmas trees which decorate the High Street. It has now grown to a two day event of family fun to incorporate music, dance, entertainment and the Farmers’ Market and has become a fixed item in the town’s social calendar. The focus is still on local producers but in order to provide as wide a variety as possible selected retailers from outside of the town are allowed to trade. An estimated 3000-5000 people attend the event, a substantial number of whom are from out of town, to see what we have to offer and will visit on repeat occasions.  Speaking in support of her letter Sam said that a number of the petition signatories had since retracted as it had not been clear at the time what they were signing. It appears that the covering letter that Gill Behari read out at last month’s meeting had been added after they had signed. It just would not be practical to run the event on the recreation ground, she said. John Leeks said he had spoken to the traders who had signed the petition to understand their concerns and see if they could be addressed. Matt Philcox, owner of Wildleaf Cookshop, Deli and Café said he had noticed a slight drop in sales over the BOFF weekend but attended the event handing out leaflets offering a discount which had resulted in lots of new business. Councillor Deirdre Bethune, who had already declared an interest as a member of Olney Events, spoke about the allegations of disorderly behaviour and food and vomit in shop doorways overnight. There was no evidence that this had actually happened, she said, and the organisers always had a thorough clean-up of the entire area at the end of the day. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings observed that BOFF is only one of four events per year which necessitated closure of the Market Place and is the only multi-day event. Steve Clark said that use of the Market Place had been discussed by the council many times and it was important to remember that it is a public space first and a car park second. The organisers and objectors should sit around a table and proactively resolve the issues, he said.  Tony Evans, who had also declared an interest, agreed that BOFF would not work anywhere else but was concerned that it should not become a victim of its own success. It started as a food festival and is in danger of becoming a rock concert, he said. A proposal to hold the event on the 8th to 10th September 2017 was voted on and passed unanimously.

    Olney Youth Centre
    OTC have applied to take control of the building and associated land from MKC under the Community Asset Transfer (CAT) scheme. As part of the transfer process OTC commissioned a full survey of the building that identified faults which will cost £150k to correct. Although the faults are mainly due to MKC neglect it appears that OTC will need to provide funding for this and prove to MKC that it has the funds available. The process has now stalled because the emerging Neighbourhood Plan has earmarked the associated land for development of a new GP surgery. The general principles of CAT state that any transferred asset must only be used for the pre-transfer purpose and MKC is concerned that OTC could gain financially from the sale of the land for the development. For that reason they have proposed that the building only would be transferred. Peter Geary said it appeared that MKC had “seen the pound signs” but saw no reason for the building and land to be split, since the CAT rules allowed MKC to claw back any profit that OTC might make from sale of the land. Tony Evans was of the view that the two must not be split. If MKC want OTC to pay for their years of neglect of the building then the land must be included as well. Later in the meeting Desmond Eley said that a number of people had complained to him that they could never get hold of anyone to book the building, as the phone wasn’t answered or messages returned. Jeremy Rawlings said that there was an ongoing ‘admin problem’ and in the interim members of the public should contact him to make bookings.

    Recreation Ground Sewer
    There has long been a problem of the sewer backing up when events are held in any of the sports clubs or extensive use is made of the public toilets. This is due to a collapsed sewer where it diverts under the fence alongside the football pitch and under a private property before joining the main sewer in East Street. OTC commissioned David Smith Associates to conduct a survey which identified the location of the problem and proposed rerouting of the sewer to bypass it. It is likely to cost several thousand pounds to complete, but OTC is hopeful it would be paid for by Anglian Water. The regulations state that if the service is routed from one private property via another before joining with the mains then it is the responsibility of the utility company from that point and this sewer serves the tennis, bowling and football clubs.

    Olney Wine Bar and Brasserie – license application
    The November meeting of the MKC Licensing Committee considered an application by John Shayler on behalf of the Olney Wine Bar and Brasserie for a license amendment to align the hours permitted for sale of alcohol, performance of music and performance of dance. The requested hours were 10:00- 00:30 Sunday to Thursday and 10:00-01:30 Friday and Saturday. OTC had objected to the extended hours and had proposed 10:00-11:00 Sunday to Thursday and 10:00-00:00 Friday and Saturday. The objection was upheld and it appears that the request for extended hours during the week has been withdrawn. For information, Mr Shayler is involved in the running of lap dancing clubs in Ampthill and Dunstable and the application included a request for ‘Dance performers for the entertainment of customers’ but listed Adult Entertainment as ‘None’.

    unknown
    The Olney Wine Bar

    Devolved Landscape Maintenance
    As reported last month MKC has had to cut £111m from its current budget and needs to find £20m next year plus a further £60m by 2020. In order to do this it is proposing to devolve some local services to the parish councils. A letter has been received from Carole Mills, Chief Executive of MKC, attempting to provide an update on progress, although it seemed to cause more confusion than it did provide information. The services involved include weed killing and filling of grit bins. Peter Geary pointed out that MKC is currently able to benefit from bulk discounts of materials which would not be available to the individual parishes if they had to purchase individually. Tony Evans reminded councillors that when OTC took over the maintenance of open spaces from MKC it did not include responsibility for large trees. MKC has not carried out any maintenance for many years resulting in a potentially liability for OTC if it was forced to take over the responsibility. Bucks Association of Local Councils (BALC) will be holding a conference in March next year to hopefully gain consensus on a way forward but there was concern that this might be too late.

    Traffic on Aspreys
    In August OTC placed a Speed Indicating Device (SID) on Aspreys and the results are now available:
    10 MPH - 25 vehicles 20 MPH - 403 vehicles  30 MPH - 5970 vehicles 40 MPH - 6852 vehicles 50 MPH - 565 vehicles 60+ MPH - 36 vehicles
    Colin Rodden was concerned about the excessive speed outside of the Ousedale campus (although this survey was carried out during the school holidays) and thought perhaps the current advisory 20 MPH limit should be mandatory.

    Odds and Sods
    The steps leading up to the Co-op from the High Street will be repaired but there has been no response yet from the Co-op regarding responsibility of the surrounding land in general. Peter Geary summarised the MKC budget proposals explaining that the bus operators grant had been reduced. Street cleaning frequency will be reduced, the rapid reaction street cleaning will be reduced from two teams to one, and the Noise Complaints team will only operate from 09:00-17:00 Monday to Friday. Rosemary Osbourne reported that dumping of waste on ‘Pebody Island’ had continued. Jeremy Rawlings said it had been reported to the Environment Agency but the matter would be reported again. OTC has completed the purchase of a small piece of land at The Goosey which was required to complete the Olney Circular Walk. Next Meeting - 9th January The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 9th January in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.

    -----

    Mercury's reports for 2017


    Public Participation:

    Sue Warren Sue Warren spoke on the subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent. While householders had now received the residents parking scheme consultation, some were struggling to understand it and, in particular, the annual £50 permit charge. This topic is dealt with in the main body of the meeting below. Rod Parker Rod Parker also spoke about parking, this time in Orchard Rise. This has worsened over the last ten years. The main problems are safety (there’s no pavement), reduced road width (due to the line of parked cars) requiring larger vehicles to mount the grass verge, and lack of access to driveways (due to poor parking). Residents formed a small committee around a year ago and, keeping the residents informed throughout, it’s looked into various solutions and discussed the issue with both Olney and Milton Keynes Councils. Yellow lines were suggested and rejected due to them being too expensive and restrictive. A residents parking scheme was then suggested. The Committee liked the idea so a petition was sent to Milton Keynes Council (MKC). Again, this topic is dealt with in the main body of the meeting below.

    Election of Deputy Mayor
    With Ron Bull having left the Council, a vacancy has arisen for the post of Deputy Mayor. There were two candidates: Sally Pezaro (in her absence) and Desmond Eley. Votes were taken and Sally was elected Deputy Mayor with six votes, with Desmond having four.

    Parking in Oakdown Crescent
    The consultation document has now been sent to those living in the Crescent plus the houses in the immediate vicinity, first online (not ideal for the elderly residents) then printed. If 70% or more respondents are in favour, the scheme will be in place within six months. While parking permit schemes within Milton Keynes Borough are free in the current financial year, there is a proposal for an annual £50 permit charge starting April 2017 – hence it being raised as a concern in the Public participation part of this meeting. Deidre Bethune felt it was not ideal that pensioners would have to pay for parking permits. Peter Geary replied that this point had been raised for a number of schemes and that there was a proposal for them to be free for pensioners, although it was uncertain if or when this would be agreed. He also noted that the advantage of residents paying was that the schemes would likely be better enforced. Martine Stoffels asked if Olney Town Council (OTC) should be trying to help the residents understand the scheme, though Jeremy Rawlings noted that it had no jurisdiction in the matter – it could only comment and suggest. Joe Stacey said that the issue was a ‘bit of a mess’, ‘disgraceful’ and had ‘gone on and on’. He suggested that OTC write a strong letter to MKC’s Chief Executive to get this remarkably long running issue sorted out. Peter felt the Council should hold back on that option for now, explaining that writing now could provoke the easy response that ‘a process was underway’, as the parking scheme for which OTC had pushed was moving forward. He felt the time to write would be if less than the required 70% of the respondents were in favour of the scheme, in which case further thought would be needed.

    Parking in Orchard Rise
    This item required a decision on whether the Council would support a consultation on the requested residents parking scheme in Orchard Rise. The debate on this was comparatively brief since, while Joe Stacey wanted to know more about the issue before the Council expressed its opinion, the general view appeared to be that sensible investigations had already taken place, there was no financially viable alternative and it didn’t seem democratic to ignore the views of the residents and MKC. The Council voted all in favour of expressing a positive opinion, bar one abstention.

    unknown
    Orchard Rise parking problem

    Hanging baskets
    The hanging baskets mounted on the lampposts along the A509 in the Summer have been organised by Ron Bull for the last 11 years, and his wife Sheila for around five years before that. He’s stepping down from this task, and has asked the Council if it would take over. Colin Rodden thanked him for his hard work over this long period. Tony Evans noted that the time needed for basket planting and subsequent growth meant that a decision was required in the next month or so. Councillors agreed to see if another organisation, for example Olney Events, would take on the task with the proviso that, if not, the Council would take it on with Councillors doing the organisation so as not to create more work for Council staff.

    Market Place Christmas tree
    Deidre felt that the tree had insufficient impact in its current position South of the toilet block near the High Street, and suggested it be moved to the High Street side of the grass area behind the war memorial. She’d talked with some members of the local Royal British Legion (RBL) and they were content provided the tree was not too close to the memorial. The general view was that the idea was good, so it will be investigated further and the RBL contacted for an official response.

    Milton Keynes Council budget consultation
    As reported previously, MKC needs to find £20m of cost savings next year plus a further £60m by 2020. Peter Geary spoke about a few of the ways in which this will likely affect local Councils. The effects on landscape maintenance, the filling of grit bins and weed spraying have been reported previously. He added another two planned cuts: MKC’s Emergency Planning Service (which swings into action in the event of a major incident such a gas explosion) may soon operate only 9-5 Monday to Friday, and the subsidy given to bus companies for Junior Tripper bus passes may reduce causing their price to increase. It was also noted that the precepts charged by local Councils would almost certainly increase as a result of responsibilities they took over from MKC. John Boardman was unsure how MKC could achieve the 60m savings, noting that the Council Tax from the planned additional dwellings would nowhere near cover the shortfall. Peter Geary noted that growth was actually much of the problem: Councils have to provide services, such as schools, to new housing areas before they’re fully built and generating Council Tax revenue. He also noted that MKC’s current cutting and slicing of services could not continue and that what was really needed was a radical change to the way it functions and provides services. He felt that the Government would not stop cutting until Councils bit the bullet and transformed, for example by empowering the people at the bottom of the organisation. Finally, Peter noted that OTC would pretty much have to ‘stomach’ the changes for this year, but plan ahead for which cuts it will accept and which it will fight over the coming three years. The increasing importance of developing a two sided good and cooperative relationship between OTC and MKC was noted.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    Pinders Circus will be held on the Pyghtle from Thursday 27th to Sunday 30th April. As reported previously, Kevin Viney was concerned about the colour of light which would be provided by the new LED lighting units when the lamp posts on the High Street were replaced. A verbal response has now been received but, being quite technical, has been requested in writing. Separately, the lighting units on all lamp posts in Olney and Newport Pagnell are due for replacement in the next financial year.

    Olney Wine Bar and Brasserie
    As reported last month, the MKC Licensing Committee considered an application from John Shayler on behalf of the Olney Wine Bar and Brasserie to align the hours permitted for the sale of alcohol, performance of music and performance of dance. After noting OTC’s objection to the later hours requested, the Committee voted to curtail these hours, and approved the application with the sale of alcohol permitted 10am – 11pm Sunday to Thursday, and 10am – midnight Friday and Saturday. It is also a condition of the licence that drinks must not be consumed in the outside area after 9pm.

    Yardley Road Solar Park
    Tony Evans reported that construction of the Yardley Road Solar Park was now well underway. There are 2-300m of field track leading from the turning on Yardley Road and, while some attempt has been made to keep this track in good condition, it has not been successful, so mud is being pulled onto the road by vehicles exiting the site. He felt this was a safety risk, particularly with the exit being on the crest of a bend which is taken quickly by many drivers. Jeremy Rawlings noted that it was a statutory duty not to bring mud onto the highway from such sites and Peter Geary concurred, saying it was an issue for planning enforcement. Next Meeting - 6th February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for February 2017

    Public Participation
    Sue Warren Sue Warren spoke on the subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent. The results of the residents parking scheme consultation have now been published and as this was an item on the main agenda it will be covered in the main body of the report.

    Co-option of new councillor
    A vacancy had arisen on the council, following the resignation of Ron Bull. There had been no request from the electorate for an election so it fell to the council to fill the post by co-option. There was only on applicant for the post, that being Kevin Viney, who was therefore elected unopposed. In his letter of application Kevin stated that he had lived and worked in the town since 1994 and been the director of two companies that created eight part-time vacancies drawn from Olney and four from neighbouring villages. He had also helped successfully fight the closure of the local day centre at the Kitchener Centre.

    Parking in Oakdown Crescent
    The parking scheme consultation document was sent to all residents of Oakdown Crescent and those of 70-92 Weston Road (even numbers only). The latter are houses that face the grassed area of The Pyghtle and back on to Oakdown Crescent, with no parking outside their homes so are effectively ‘land-locked’. A total of 33 surveys were sent out of which 31 were correctly completed and returned and the result was 61% against the introduction of a resident parking scheme, although 87% agreed that parking was either a problem or a serious problem. This was below the 70% required for the scheme to go ahead. The main objection to the scheme appeared to be the likely £50 per permit charge recently announced by Milton Keynes Council (MKC) for all such schemes in the borough, although there is a possibility that this might be waived for elderly residents. Sue Warren, whose mother lives in Oakdown Crescent, expressed her disappointment at the result and said that the MKC officer who had visited the residents expressed the opinion that the charge would probably not be applied. If that were the case the vote would almost certainly have gone the other way, she felt. She was critical of Olney Town Council (OTC) for not getting sufficiently behind the scheme but accepted that the vote meant it would not now happen. Her sister now has a blue disabled badge, she said, and so would be campaigning to ensure that a disabled space was provided. As a resident of the Weston Road houses, Bryan Rice expressed his frustration at the length of time it had taken to get to the current stage and said that the right questions had not been asked of the right people. He felt that the market value of his house had been adversely affected by the delay and was considering legal advice on compensation. Some of the children of the ‘land-locked’ residents would soon be getting cars of their own, so the situation was only going to get worse, he said. John Boardman and Mayor Jeremy Rawlings felt it was unfair to criticise OTC as the members and Town Clerk Liam Costello had done a tremendous amount to find a resolution. A discussion took place about what the next step should be, as the issue remains that the existing layout is unsatisfactory and the surface is breaking up. Joe Stacey was of the opinion that OTC should decide on a way forward and ask MKC to implement it, but Colin Rodden thought that MKC should identify the most cost effective solution, as they have experts who are paid to know such things. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said it was unlikely that MKC would take the initiative on any further action, since they would only progress projects where there was agreement of those impacted and the survey had proved that there wasn’t. The next step would be for OTC to agree on a layout to maximise the available space and to get it resurfaced, he said.

    Community Skate/BMX Park
    An Invitation to Tender document has been produced by the committee that was working to provide this facility, but it had only been sent to the council on the morning of the meeting and many members felt that they hadn’t had time to fully study it. Although absent from the meeting, Desmond Eley had provided written comments. His main points were around the fact that the document appeared to be placing the main responsibility for the tendering, planning, construction and ongoing maintenance of the park with OTC. At a previous meeting OTC had agreed to support the project with funding. Tony Evans reminded members that the final position relied on the successful relocation of the existing zip wire and was concerned that it was still too close to the cricket pitch. He wondered how a tender date could be declared if the full funding was not yet available. It needed to be ‘sitting in someone’s account’ he thought. Peter Geary said it was good that the document had been produced but the location needed to be agreed by all affected parties before the request for planning permission could be submitted. It was agreed that a weekend site meeting should be set up to include representatives of the Cricket Club, Bowling Club, Tennis Club, Football Club including Colts, skaters, and parents of children who use the play equipment.

    Financial matters
    MKC needs to make savings of £56m over the next four years and had proposed reducing the previously agreed grant for Devolved Landscape Service for the next financial year by a third. This grant covers litter picking, grass cutting and play area maintenance. Following submissions made by OTC and other parish councils MKC has agreed to defer the decision for a further year in order to gain agreement as to how the savings can be made. The OTC budget for 2017/18 was presented to the meeting, including the Parish Precept, which is the portion of the MKC Council Tax that is allocated to the parish councils in order to provide the services that they are responsible for. The precept for Olney will be increased from £177,081.76 to £185,050.00, an overall increase of 4.5%. The figure usually used to benchmark average Council Tax is for a Band D property, the precept portion which will see a rise from £70.79 to £73.57 – a rise of 3.93%. It was noted that this considerably less than the average rise across the rest of Milton Keynes. The budget was proposed and passed unanimously.

    Neighbourhood Plan
    A Neighbourhood Plan is document that sets out planning policies for the neighbourhood area which is written by the local community, rather than the Local Planning Authority and is a powerful tool to ensure the community gets the right types of development, in the right place. The Planning Authority, in this case MKC, is obliged to use it to decide whether to approve planning applications. Joe Stacey reported that the Olney plan had completed the consultation stage and had been submitted to MKC. The next step would be an independent examination before going to a public referendum. Liam Costello explained that, although it is not formally adopted until approved in the referendum, it is supposed to gain weight as it progresses. However MKC have indicated that the recommendations therein will not be taken into account in the forthcoming planning decision about housing development on existing land earmarked for employment.

    Emberton Park PLUG
    Until a year ago stakeholders with an interest in the park were able to raise issues of concern with MKC at regular Park Liaison User Group (PLUG) meetings. Due to staff reductions brought about by budget cuts MKC are no longer able to resource these meetings, relying instead on their online portal for raising concerns and complaints. At the request of OTC they have offered to hold six monthly meetings with stakeholders to explore strategic suggestions and improvements to the park. Peter Geary was in favour of the offer and suggested that OTC and Emberton Parish Council should work together to agree a joint approach. Colin Rodden thought that the park was starting to deteriorate quite badly and it was important for MKC to have some sort of strategy for its future. He wondered whether it would be possible for OTC and Emberton PC to run it between them, in a similar manner to Harrold Country Park. Steve Clark said that Harrold Country Park was supported by a massive subsidy from Bedford Borough Council.

    Local Events
    The council granted permission for the following events:
    Motorama on the Market Place – Sunday 11th June Fun Fair, Recreation Ground – 19th to 26th June Riverfest – Sunday 2nd July
    It was noted that BOTO (formally Booze on the Ouse) has been cancelled for this year.

    Dumping of waste on Goosey Island
    Although not a formal agenda item, having occurred after the agenda was published, it was raised under Members Matter by Rosemary Osbourne. Over the previous weekend members of the public had observed and photographed a van driver unloading waste material on to Goosey Island via the narrow wooden bridge and were up in arms about it, she said. Liam Costello said it had been reported to the Environmental Agency as commercial waste being stored without permission. It appears that a ‘Mr Chan’ purchased the island and bridge some years ago when the tannery closed down. He claims to own the land at the other end of the bridge and says that the public have no right of access. He also claims that he has stored a greenhouse on the island which has been vandalised. Steve Clark was of the opinion that it was waste, not storage, and the owner required a licence to transport and deposit it.

    unknown
    Goosey Rubbish

    Odds and Sods
    Age UK are planning to close the Tuesday lunch club held at Clifton Court due to declining numbers. OTC currently pays for the transport of residents that cannot make their own way. The Thursday lunch club at the Olney Centre will continue, so OTC will transfer its funding to the Thursday club. An agreement has been reached with all interested parties to relocate this year’s Christmas tree to the north end of the Market Place by the war memorial. Next Meeting The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Public Participation

    Sue Warren Sue Warren spoke on the subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent, remaining unhappy about the negative outcome of the residents parking scheme consultation. Frustrated that properties near the Crescent had been included in the survey – the ‘land locked’ even numbers from 70-92 Weston Road – and even claiming Council bias in the way they were chosen, she felt the result would have been positive had they not been included. She also felt that the £50 per household cost, which would in fact have been waived for elderly people although that was unclear at survey time, impacted the result. Noting that on most nights and weekends at least 18 cars were parked in the Crescent, she also stated that emergency services vehicles could not get near the houses. She cited an example of a recent ambulance arrival, where it could not reach the house it needed to visit. She finished by vowing to continue fighting for a solution to this parking problem.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Now that the consultation result had gone against the introduction of a residents parking scheme, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) had asked Olney Town Council (OTC) to send it a list of options to help resolve the situation. Deidre noted that the surface of the Crescent was in very poor condition and unsafe to walk on, the holes patched by MKC having quickly reappeared. OTC has drawings of two proposed layouts for parking in the Crescent, one with parking around the edges and one with parking in a central rectangle, and these will be sent as a possible basis for a plan moving forward.

    Skate and BMX park
    Although the park was not discussed as a formal agenda item, it was raised during a review of the minutes of last month’s Council meeting. Colin Rodden disagreed with this section of the minutes, but the resulting discussion didn’t really clarify the current state of the project. Since readers may be interested to learn how preparatory work towards the park is progressing, Mercury asked for and the Council provided a brief update: “The Council initially approved in principle a location for the Skatepark, subject to detailed plans being prepared, where the zip wire is located. It has become clear that siting it there will compromise the operation of other clubs and facilities. Consequently, the Town Clerk has been tasked to review and assess alternative locations. The Council has earmarked £33,000, from future developer contributions, towards the project. The Skate park group need to raise the remaining funds.”

    Yardley Road/Aspreys development
    As reported before, a large new housing development is planned on the land to the West of Yardley Road and Aspreys. A Preplanning Application has now been received for a proposed development of up to 250 houses, plus the associated community facilities and public open space.

    Yardley Road development
    A Planning Application for up to eight houses with detached garages on a parcel of land to the West of Yardley Road, which was refused last July, has now been appealed and a new application submitted. A member of OTC spoke against it at a recent MKC Development Control Committee meeting, but the application was granted by the Committee by one in favour and four abstentions. One cited reason was that there was no realistic chance of the land being passed back into employment use. OTC felt this was surprising, given that local business Scorpion Mouldings had tried to buy the land four times before and still wished to do so now. Using a little cited clause, the Council has asked MKC to look again at the process to see if it had been performed incorrectly, and thus it will have been considered by the time this is published.

    Goosey Island
    As reported in the previous article, a van driver has been unloading rubbish on Goosey Island. Rosemary Osborne again raised concerns about this but it appeared that, having informed the Environment Agency and MKC that waste was being stored on the land without permission, there was little more OTC could do other than wait. Specifically, it is MKC which has the enforcement powers; OTC does not.

    Standing orders item 23
    Item 23 of OTC’s Standing Orders (those being the rules which govern how a Council works), states: Unauthorised activities: (a) Unless authorised by a resolution, no individual Councillor shall, in the name or on behalf of the Council, a committee or a sub-committee: (i) inspect any land and/or premises which the Council has a right or duty to inspect; or (ii) issue orders, instructions or directions. Colin Rodden reported that he’d received art designs from Olney Middle School to include in the circular walk around Olney. He also mentioned that Milton Keynes Council had offered to do some public artwork for the walk. Joe Stacey replied stating that Colin’s emails on this topic and on a Section 106 matter were in breach of Standing Orders item 23 because he was effectively ‘going solo’, without the knowledge and agreement of the Council. Colin, explaining that he’d not been looking to take any decisions in this way, apologised if he’d done anything wrong. The resulting discussion went on for some time, with nearly all Councillors who contributed speaking along similar lines to Joe. Peter Geary put forward a differing view, that Councillors can seek advice (on Section 106 and other matters) and that, in any case, there was effectively no way to enforce Standing Orders. He also felt that the only way for the Council to work effectively was together: Olney Council was nowhere near a split but, having seen the effect of splits in other Councils, he didn’t want to see one happen here. Colin rounded off the discussion, stating that he’d not been “trying to go behind anyone’s back” and that it was the “first time he’d heard about it”, which was “very disappointing”. Finally, Peter noted that the Council must resolve this issue outside this meeting, and that it would “need change from all of us”. Next Meeting 3rd April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate


    Public Participation

    Sue Warren Sue Warren spoke on the subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent, saying that she was upset that it was not an agenda item, having been assured some years ago that it would be a monthly agenda item to keep the momentum going. ‘Where was the feedback from the Highways Dept and Ambulance service?’ she asked, following her statement last month that an ambulance had been obstructed by parked cars. The poor condition of the pathways has still not been resolved, which is becoming more of a problem as the better weather means the residents are getting out and about. If one of them falls there would be a ‘huge compensation claim’, she said. Oakdown crescent is not a quiet or nice area for senior citizens and they are paying exorbitant rents just to live in a car park, she said. She finished off by asking the councillors if they would let their mothers live in a car park? Note: later in the meeting when reviewing outstanding actions it was noted that the ambulance service has no record of the alleged incident of obstruction and resurfacing is due to commence this month.

    Public Realm Services
    Mayor Jeremy Rawlings, Milton Keynes (MKC) Ward Councillor Peter Geary, Olney Town Councillor (OTC) Helena Newbould and Town Clerk Liam Costello recently attended a conference of MK Association of Local Councils, to look at how local councils can work with MKC in order to deliver important services at lower cost. To date MKC has cut £111m from its budget, but needs to find another £22m next year and £60m by 2020. In order to do this it is looking to transfer responsibility for a number of services to the local councils. Olney has already taken over responsibility for landscaping and has the necessary equipment and staff, but this is not an option for some smaller parishes. However, OTC could sell its services to smaller neighbouring parishes. MKC currently has two separate contracts with Serco to provide Landscaping (including play areas) and Street Cleansing, which still have some time to run. It is able to negotiate a ‘bulk’ price to cover the whole of the borough, but at the expense of excluding smaller companies that could not service on such a large scale. However, individual councils would now be at liberty to engage with smaller companies directly and might be able to negotiate a more favourable price. Possible future service options are:
    ● Councils take over management of MKC’s contract with Serco in their Parish, pay them directly and top up to the standard they want. MKC provides them with base level funding. ● Councils provide their own contractors. MKC provides base level funding to them directly. ● MKC provide base level service and councils pay MKC for any top up they want. ● MKC provides base level service and councils provide their own contractor for any top up they want.
    Parish councils have until August 2017 to decide how they want to move forward, which Joe Stacey did not think sufficient. Peter Geary said it was important for OTC to decide what it would and wouldn’t be prepared to take on and then produce a strategy, since environmental services such as landscaping and street cleansing were much less complex than ‘people services’ (presumably such as education and welfare).

    Plan MK
    MKC has now entered into a 12 week public consultation, from 17th March to 9th June, on the Draft Plan. When it is adopted it will be the new Local Plan for Milton Keynes, setting out how and where developments will take place up to 2031. Jeremy Rawlings said it wasn’t particularly controversial for Olney yet, and Peter Geary said that Olney would have its own adopted Neighbourhood Plan, so would not be required to accept more houses than it had already signed up to. The proposed expressway from Buckingham to M1 J13 is an important pre-condition to any development on the east side of the M1 though, he said. The draft plan is available at https://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/planning-and-building/planning-policy/plan-mk or Milton Keynes and Olney libraries.

    Yardley Road development
    As reported last month, a Planning Application for up to eight dwellings on a parcel of land to the West of Yardley Road was refused last July, was appealed and a new application submitted and subsequently passed. OTC invoked Para 51 of the MKC constitution to review the decision making process and see if it had been performed incorrectly, since the land is currently earmarked for business use in the draft Neighbourhood Plan. An adjacent company wished to purchase the land for employment purposes but had been refused. Once again the MKC planners have ignored the wishes of OTC and the draft plan, despite representations from OTC members present, and apparently voted along party lines to reject the call to review the decision. 

    Replacement street lighting
    As reported previously, the lamp posts in the High Street have reached the end of their life and are being replaced by MKC, using a similar design to the existing ones. At the same time the familiar yellow sodium lights will be replaced by high efficiency LED lights. In December, prior to becoming a member of OTC, Kevin Viney spoke at a council meeting about the impacts of the much brighter white LED lights that will be used. He also wrote a letter to MKC outlining his concerns about the visual impact of what he considered the ‘morgue like’ 4000°K white lights and associated health impacts to those who were exposed to the light. At the time he also suggested that warmer 3000°K lights could be used instead. A rather wordy reply was written, but has only just been received from the Street Lighting Manager of Ringway Infrastructure Services, who manage the street lighting for MKC. It stated that the proposed LED lights would provide savings of at least 50% over the existing sodium lights on energy alone, although the warmer 3000°K lights requested by Kevin are 15% less efficient than the 4000°K white lights. Added to that, the current lamps have to be replaced every four years, whereas the LEDs would last in excess of 25 years. The yellow lights were only introduced in the 1950/1960s, the previous lighting being white and prior to that gas lighting existed, which would also have been white. Thus, it was claimed the new white lights would create a more historically accurate look. The letter also denied that there is any known risk to human health, including disturbed circadian rhythms, when LED lights are employed. LED lighting has major benefits to facial recognition and colour rendition leading to safer streets in terms of crime reduction and a better lit environment for both pedestrians and vehicles. The letter said that change is often seen as a negative but LED is the future of all road/footpath and public lighting and is something that the public will not only get used to but also embrace. 

    unknown
    Sodium Light v 4K LED Light - Oundle Town Centre (April 2017) © Kevin Viney


    Kevin presented a picture that he had taken in the historic town of Oundle which has been fitted with the Woburn style lamp posts that are due to replace the similar ones in Olney and where one sodium light had been left. This enabled comparison of the intensity and colour with the modern LED lamp replacements. On the left of the picture is the warm yellow light (see illumination on pavement) and to the right is the somewhat harsh intense light from the 4K LED fitting, along with the similar colour of the fluorescent white of the shop front illuminating the ground. On a wet surface the white light would give a lot of glare, he said. Replacement in Olney is due to commence at the beginning of April, but Kevin suggested that OTC request MKC to delay for a period of six weeks until Holophane, the supplier, can obtain the warmer 3000°K lights. These are the norm in the USA, he said. John Boardman wondered if MKC had had any feedback from other parishes where LED lighting had been deployed and thought that High Street residents would be the first to complain when it happened in Olney. Joe Stacey asked if OTC actually have any authority to delay the deployment and Jeremy Rawlings questioned whether as a council they wanted to. Sally Pezaro was of the opinion that the yellow lights are part of the Olney atmosphere, particularly with the Christmas lights. The council agreed to request the delay. Update:A response has been received from MKC refusing to agree to the delay and stating that the replacement of lighting in the High Street will commence on 18th April and then continue to the rest of the town. The reply stated that “the design of the lights has already been reduced from the 5000k that have been used on the grid road network that has formed part of our overall replacement programme. It has been proven that the temperature of the proposed units replicates moonlight, which is the best type of light source for the human eye to view at night.” A number of the lights already exist in the town for residents to compare for themselves. They are the top of Spring Lane, the footpath on Aspreys between Sillswood and Hollow Wood, and The Knoll close to the (A)Maya restaurant. Any comment should be addressed to MKC Street lighting on 01908 252353 (Mon-Fri).

    Fun Fair
    John Scarrott and Sons will be bringing the funfair to Olney between 19th and 26th June. As Chairman of the Recs and Services Committee, Tony Evans has requested that it is not located on the Nursery Field (football pitch) due to damage that has been caused previously and is now repaired (note: last year Scarrotts voluntarily cancelled at the last minute, for fear of causing damage as the ground was so wet). Joe Stacey questioned whether the damage had actually impacted the football club and suggested that if damage is caused then Scarrotts should be asked to pay for it. Jeremy Rawlings said that there really was nowhere else it could be held and suggested that it go ahead this year with a review in July, which was agreed.

    Town Meeting
    The Annual Town Meeting will take place on Thursday 18th May at 7.00 pm in the Olney Centre, with cheese and wine after. This is your chance to come and meet your councillors and police representatives and question them on any matters concerning the town and its future. Perhaps you have an opinion on LED street lighting? Are you in favour of the growth of the Town? Are you happy with the level of policing? Alternatively, you could just have a moan on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook page…. Next Meeting - 8th May The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 8th May in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Public Participation

    Sue Warren Sue Warren spoke on the subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent. She’d been in contact with Milton Keynes Council (MKC), who’d stated that the footpaths in the Crescent would not be repaired, even though Olney Town Council (OTC) had claimed this would happen in May. She also noted that MKC would have been happy to survey just Crescent householders for the residents parking scheme, it being OTC who insisted that those nearby also be surveyed. She asked why OTC had not insisted on the same treatment for Orchard Rise which, in pretty short order from the idea being put forward, will very likely have a parking scheme. She also noted that MKC told her no money had ever been ring fenced for improvements to the Crescent, which she felt contradicted an assurance given to her by OTC. Sue concluded by asking Councillors if they’d let their mothers live in a car park. David Chennells David Chennells spoke about the poor state of the Long Lane bridleway section heading West from the crest of the hill. That and the section to its East have suffered damage due to vehicle movements associated with g2 Energy connecting the Yardley Road solar farm to the grid. However, while the Eastern section has been very well reinstated, the Western section has not. Instead, while a broken land drain has been repaired and a French drain installed, the surface appears simply to have been flattened using a road roller. David felt this inadequate because the grass which used to grow there, providing a surface mat and stabilising the ground with its roots, had been chewed off by the vehicles and was no longer present. He was particularly concerned about this from a horse riding perspective, as horses’ gaits puts them in danger of injury from boggy ground. He concluded by saying that as soon as we saw some sustained wet weather, this section of the bridleway would turn into a quagmire

    Parking in Oakdown Crescent
    As reported before, there are two proposals for providing marked parking spaces in the Crescent, one sighting them at the edges of the central area and one in its middle. Councillors continue to prefer the latter. The Council had received an email from MKC stating that it was happy to look at either option but that OTC must apply for it through the Community Parking Fund, which would see MKC and OTC each pay half the cost. OTC must apply for this before 23rd June, at which point MKC will consider the application. The email also stated that the footpaths in the Crescent would not be repaired, as the surface was not sufficiently poor to meet the intervention level criteria and there was little or no budget for housing footpaths. Responding to points raised by Sue and by MKC’s email, Peter Geary explained that money had been earmarked for the Crescent rather than ring fenced, and suggested OTC challenge why the paths had not been resurfaced since he’d been told they would be. Responding to Sue’s question about whether Councillors would let their mothers live in a car park, he stated that this was just what would be happening if either of the proposals was enacted.

    Mayor and Deputy Mayor
    Jeremy Rawlings was elected unopposed as Mayor and Sally Pezaro was appointed, also unopposed, as Deputy Mayor.

    Long Lane bridleway
    Councillors suggested that a working party, including a representative from MKC, have a site meeting with David Coles so he could show them the extent of the problem.

    Orchard Rise parking
    The survey to see if Orchard Rise should have a residents parking scheme has found that 87% of the households were in favour so, this being well above the 70% threshold, a statutory consultation will take place shortly and the scheme is expected to be introduced within six months.

    Waste on Goosey Island
    As reported before, there is a growing problem with the landowner depositing waste on Goosey Island. He has been served with two notices in an attempt to remedy the situation: The first was to remove the waste within 14 days, a time which has now expired. The second was to remove the structures, for example containers, within 28 days. At the time of writing, it’s part way through this period yet more structures continue to appear. It was noted that Goosey Bridge has two owners, the Council and the landowner each owning up to half way across. With it being an old bridge and there being vehicle movements associated with this issue, the Council will ask a Structural Engineer to assess its safe weight limit, with the aim of then placing a sign to display it.

    Air quality
    Kevin Viney met with MKC’s Air Quality Officer. A few years ago, the roadside pollution monitoring cabinet near the Church Hall was installed in response to the NO2 levels being above the permitted maximum. It is now becoming unreliable and reaching the end of its life. During that time, pollution levels have dropped to below the permitted limit but remain significant, with the Officer noting various issues which may cause further concern: traffic increase due to the economy and the proposed additional houses in Olney, windless days leading to a pollution hot spot in that location, and the possibility that the Government may tighten regulations to include smaller particles which the current equipment cannot measure. All that said, there was cost pressure to remove the unit along with a similar one in Newport Pagnell, with the only one remaining in the area being at MKC’s office. The criteria for that choice were interesting, the latter unit being chosen to remain more to continue a long running data collection than in response to high pollution levels at its location. The Officer suggested that OTC consider replacing the unit with a more modern type funded from Section 106, for example money from the developers of the forthcoming new houses near Yardley Road and Aspreys. Modern monitoring units can, in addition to the measurements captured by the exiting unit, also measure the smaller particles from diesel engines, and can make their readings available near real time. So, for example, a run could be planned to avoid the area if current pollution levels were unduly high. Councillors will consider this although, with money being tight, it was not obvious that the unit will be replaced.

    Alleyway between High Street and East Street
    This item concerns the alleyway which runs from the High Street to East Street, emerging near the football pitch. In spite of the existing pedestrian chicane, concerns have been raised for the safety of those exiting the alleyway into East Street. Cars often mount the pavement there and, with it being a narrow stretch of road, often parked on and close to a corner, visibility is poor. OTC will see if MKC can place bollards on the pavement either side of the alleyway exit.

    Licensing
    Late last year, MKC’s Licensing Subcommittee voted to restrict the opening hours of Olney Wine Bar to below those which the business applied for, OTC having objected to the times in the application. The Wine Bar appealed this decision, so MKC sought legal advice as to whether to fight this. Given the facts of this particular case, the advice was that it could not be defended so MKC felt compelled to agree to the licence as applied for. More Than Just Coffee (Taylors old premises) has applied for a licence to supply alcohol on the premises from 12.00 - 23.00 Monday to Sunday, with late night opening, from 23.00 - 01.00, on Christmas Eve, Boxing Day and New Year’s Eve. Councillors did not raise any objections.

    High Street lamppost replacement
    As you’ll no doubt be aware, MKC’s contractors are working to replace the lampposts on the High Street, at the same time upgrading their lighting units to LEDs which emit a whiter light than the existing lamps. Kevin Viney explained that the new posts were not as ornate, and noted that the swan fittings had not so far been transferred to them. The Council will ask MKC about this, having been told they would be retained. Kevin also noted that residents can complain if the new posts light areas which, previously unlit, are now troublesome. Although there’s a £130 charge for rectifying this, it can be waived under certain circumstances. Next Meeting - 5th June The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th June in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Public Participation

    Residents are permitted to speak on any subject they wish at the start of Olney Town Council (OTC) meetings. They are allocated three minutes and the councillors are not obliged to respond unless the matter is a formal agenda item. The matter can, however, be made an agenda item for a future meeting. The three minute rule was strictly enforced by Mayor Jeremy Rawlings at this month’s meeting. Bryan Rice First to speak was Bryan Rice on the subject of parking In Oakdown Crescent. Bryan lives in one of the ‘landlocked’ houses backing onto Oakdown Crescent and would not have been able to park near his house had the now abandoned residents’ parking scheme gone ahead. He said that he had being doing some historical research into the issue and had found a three-year business plan for Olney produced in 1963 which had included building the houses (presumably Oakdown Crescent). At this time there was a roadway to the rear of the now landlocked houses in Weston Road. The houses in Oakdown Crescent were built in 1968 and the car park built in the middle. When that car park was built it was intended to be for residents of Weston Road and Oakdown Crescent but the residents of Weston Road were subsequently informed that their tenancies would be terminated if they parked in the crescent. Finally, Bryan said that he had some ideas for the proposed layout of the new parking space that he would be happy to share with the council. Sue Warren Next to speak was Sue Warren on the same subject. She wanted to know why it was not a formal item on the agenda as it was resolved at the last meeting that three items should be pursued. Sarah Gonsalves, Head of Policy and Performance at Milton Keynes Council (MKC), was present at the meeting so Sue addressed much of her statement to her. She presented some photos taken the previous day, saying that the situation was ‘horrendous’.  She repeated that her sister, also present, was registered disabled and there was no disabled bay, even though MKC are obliged to provide one. She said OTC had ‘interfered’ with the residents’ survey by insisting that residents of Weston Road were included, which had resulted in an overall vote against a residents’ parking scheme. Why had the residents of West Street not been included in the similar survey for a scheme in Orchard Rise, she asked? She repeated her statement that the paths were a disgrace and MKC had better be prepared for a huge claim if any of the residents had a fall as a result. Bryan Rice Bryan Rice attempted to respond but Jeremy Rawlings refused to let him speak, saying he’d had his allotted three minutes and bringing down the gavel several times to call the meeting to order. MKC Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that Bryan’s reference to historical events was irrelevant as there had been several changes in the local authority since 1963. Also the tenancy act had been introduced, which meant that tenancies could not be cancelled in such circumstances. Jeremy Rawlings said the reason that it was not an agenda item was because there was nothing new to report.

    Planning
    A discussion took place regarding the proposal for 250 homes on Land West of Yardley Road and West of Aspreys. Peter Geary noted that the current plans show a single access from Yardley Road although OTC had expressed a preference that there should be a second access from Aspreys. He said that he would formally raise an objection to the plans as Ward Councillor, in order that the second access was included. Asked by Heléna Newbold to clarify comments made in the Councillor Corner column of The Phonebox, Peter said that the published plans are nothing more than a picture of what the site could look like and the minute details of what would eventually be provided cannot be controlled in planning. At a later stage in the meeting the member discussed the Section 106 contribution, which the developers have to pay to MKC as a ‘planning gain’ and will be in the region of £5m for the development. All agreed that it was essential that as much as possible of that amount is used to benefit Olney and not the greater Milton Keynes. Of particular interest was the £112.5k allocated to landscaping, all of which should come to OTC as it manages its own landscaping.

    Public Realm Services
    Kay Pettit and Sarah Gonsalves were present to speak about MKC’s plans to deliver Public Realm services under the current financial restraints. Sarah said this was one of a series of meetings with the parish councils to get an understanding of the issues they face, not just in public realm services. She explained that it had been necessary to reduce costs but not much more cutting could be done without services suffering. Landscaping and waste service had attracted most attention, she said, noting that OTC along with some other councils had devolved responsibility for landscaping, although MKC had little understanding of how this was working and agreed that the relationship between MKC and the parishes was not as good as it could be. MKC intend to produce a framework of methods to progress the various options, she said. There could be no more devolving of Landscaping, though, because MKC was tied into a contract with Serco till 2020. Kay Pettit, Programme Manager, spoke next, explaining that MKC was looking at best practice around the country and Bedford was one council that stood out. She had visited many parish and observed many different approaches, she said. Asked by Desmond Eley if the current Serco contract would be extended beyond 2020 she replied that it was under consideration. Deirdre Bethune expressed concern that MKC might again attempt to renege on the funding for devolved service. Jeremy Rawlings pointed out that although OTC manages its own landscaping, residents are still paying MKC for the landscaping of other parishes via the Council Tax. Peter Geary said that OTC had been ‘bluntly’ told at a meeting with MKC that the funding would be reduced, even though this could not actually be done due to the ongoing contract with Serco. A senior manager at MKC had assured OTC in February that the pathways of Oakdown Crescent would be repaired and then promptly left office leaving no record of the agreement, he said. This approach had caused much damage which would take years to repair and communication between the councils needed to be a two way street. Sarah responded that she was happy to look at decisions made by colleagues and recognised that it would take time for trust to build up. ‘Judge us by our actions’ she asked. Kevin Viney asked if anyone had calculated the real cost of cancelling the Serco contract. Peter Geary responded that it would be £2.5m for each remaining year and none of the contracted work would be done so it was not a viable option. Colin Rodden was of the opinion that litter was not being cleared up often enough. Sarah said that it was possible to reduce pick-ups in some areas to concentrate on areas where the problem was worse. Peter Geary noted that in Weston Underwood MKC were clearing litter more often outside of the village, since the villagers had volunteered to be responsible for litter pick up between the village signs. More use could be made of volunteer litter collection groups, such as the session recently organised by staff of local company MPA Group, he suggested.

    Neighbourhood Plan
    After three years of hard work by the steering group the Neighbourhood Plan for Olney is now ready to be presented to residents for adoption, but first the majority of the electorate have to vote in a referendum. For information, The Localism Act introduced a right for communities to draw up Neighbourhood Plans that can become part of the formal planning framework for the area. Once adopted, these Neighbourhood Plans form part of the statutory Development Plan for the area and give the local community more say and control over development in the area. The plan for Olney, if adopted, will guide development till 2031. Steve Clark said there had been lots of discussion and consultation during the evolution of the plan, but from comments on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook page, it appeared that some people thought that it could be ‘tweaked’ to make it correct. All the tweaking had been done during the development of the plan, he said, and the referendum was a simple yes/no vote on whether to adopt it. Although individual members of the council could encourage people to vote ‘Yes’, as a council they could not. Desmond Eley asked what would be the implication if only 5% of the electorate bothered to vote. Peter Geary replied that it would be carried by a simple majority under normal election rules. The council will advertise through leaflets, The Phonebox and social media, encouraging resident to use their vote.

    Waste on Goosey Island
    As previously reported, there is a growing problem with the deposit of waste and illegal erections by the landowner on Goosey Island. He has been served with two notices, both of which have expired, with no remedial action being taken. Town Clerk Liam Costello reported on the current situation but in a statement reminiscent of the computer Deep Thought from The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy said “You’re not going to like this….” However, rather than the answer to the Great Question being ‘42’ it is, in fact, ‘H&S’. It appears that the landowner has stated that it was necessary to erect the barriers on Health and Safety grounds. The Planning department appear to have accepted this and say they will review the situation in six months or so (it took Deep Thought Seven and a half million years!) The Environmental department have taken no action, saying they were leaving it to the Planning department. This obviously caused much outrage and Peter Geary said that the MKC Planning Enforcement Officer is not an H&S expert and it was essential to get the senior planning enforcement and environmental people round a table as soon as possible. Kevin Viney said it was hugely disappointing and implied that residents could not make cosmetic changes to their garages, for example, but could get away with such violations of regulations. He doubted that the environmental officer from MKC had even visited the site.

    unknown
    7th June - Two operatives were seen at the Goosey site, but were simply adding fencing to the structure, despite apparently having been served notices to remove the rubbish.
    unknown
    Pictured at the beginning of the year showing two otters on the bank of Goosey Island. Disturbing their place of rest is highly illegal and has been reported to Milton Keynes Council who have said they would look into the matter.


    Odds and Sods
    The Town Council’s annual financial statement has been prepared and may be inspected by members of the public between 11th June and 21st July. In May 2018 the Data Protection Act will be replaced by an EU directive known as the General Data Protection Regulation. The Government has confirmed that Brexit will not affect the UK implementation so councils are being advised to prepare now. Kevin Viney said that the replacement of the lights in the High Street is progressing and is due to be complete w/e 9th June. There has been a delay with some as they are adjacent to gas pipes. It is expected that those in the High Street in Newport Pagnell will be changed before the team return to Olney to start on the rest of the town. Tony Evans said that the recent Farmers’ Market had been the ‘best ever’ in terms of attendance by traders and the public and thanked Martin Ward for covering in his absence.  Heléna Newbold thanked the volunteers from Olney Events for putting up the floral baskets in the High Street. Next Meeting - 3rd July The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd July in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Public Participation

    Peter Gage Peter Gage spoke on the subject of the upcoming Orchard Rise residents parking scheme. As someone who parks in the area and is employed nearby in The Works, he felt there was not a real problem – residents could park and they have driveways. He asked about the criteria by which these schemes are judged concerned that, if this application was approved, the floodgates could open and other roads with no real problem could end up controlled by such schemes. He concluded by noting that Riverfest was a great day and thanking those involved in running it – The Olney Group (TOG) and a band of volunteer helpers. Sue Warren Sue Warren was next up, speaking about parking in Oakdown Crescent. In summary, she asked whether the Council had applied to the Community Parking Fund for money towards the implementation of Option B, parking in a single block in the middle of the main square. This was confirmed. She also questioned why the potholes on the Crescent had still not been repaired, in spite of assurances that they would be. With there being no related agenda item, this topic was not discussed further. Neil Biggs & Phil Kermeen This meeting was held three days before the Neighbourhood Plan referendum so, particularly in view of the wide ranging discussion on Facebook, it was unsurprising that people wished to talk on it here. Neil Biggs and then Phil Kermeen both spoke about the issue. Neil, who works in traffic management with Thames Valley Police, understood that the developer for the Yardley Road estate would be re-applying for outline planning permission, this time with access from Aspreys, and he had some related concerns. Now, until a few days before this meeting, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) were due to attend for a discussion on this planning application, but they’d then pulled out, citing concerns about closeness to the referendum. Neil understood this, but noted it was not ideal because people wanted answers to planning questions before voting in the referendum. He also asked whether, in the light of MKC’s recent statement, that Olney is no longer required to build these homes, there was any longer a need for the development to proceed. Phil then spoke briefly, reiterating Neil’s last question then asking whether, in the event of a ‘no’ vote, piecemeal developments would occur around the town.

    Neighbourhood Plan
    Jeremy Rawlings spoke briefly to explain that, when MKC had pulled out of attending the meeting to discuss the Plan, the item had been removed from the agenda. That left no remaining item under which the Plan could be discussed, so it could not be talked about further. This left a rather odd situation where various members of the Public, who had attended to put their points of view and learn more about the Plan before voting, couldn’t interact with either their local Councillors who’d been involved in writing the Plan or with Peter Geary, the Ward Councillor present. So they left, perhaps with the impression that the Council simply didn’t want to discuss it with them.

    Council vacancy
    Olney Town Council (OTC) has a vacancy to fill, with Martine Stoffels having left the Council. Sally Pezaro returned to this later in the meeting, stressing the need to advertise the vacancy widely and offering to publicise it on social media.

    West Street residents parking
    This item covered the Orchard Rise residents parking scheme, concerns about which had been raised earlier by Peter Gage. Colin Rodden shared Peter’s concern that this scheme might lead to a cascade of applications elsewhere in Olney, although Peter Geary noted that OTC could only comment on applications, it being MKC which made the decisions. He also noted that concerns, including the narrow width of Orchard Rise and the need for large vehicles to mount the kerbs on occasion, had been raised when OTC was originally informed of the application.

    unknown
    West Street in Olney

    Nursery field and fair
    The fair had recently visited town, based as usual on the Nursery Field, the football pitch adjacent to East Street. The associated large vehicle movements had resulted in some damage to the field, and Tony Evans was asked to comment on this. He felt that the ground would recover in time for the football season, although did question how popular the fair had been. Helena Newbold noted that, the two times she visited, it had been packed with happy looking families. John Boardman explained that the Council collected around £900 from the fair, so there was some benefit there. Tony then noted that OTC had spent money reseeding and spiking the field, and it seemed odd to do so only to have the fair damage it each year. The item concluded with the Recreations and Services Committee being asked to discuss it and recommend the best way forward.

    Summer football camps
    The Council had received an email from Pete Lindsay, who runs the children’s summer football camps. These were started by Olney Town Colts FC but are now run as a private operation, although one which contributes to the Colts to cover costs of equipment and changing rooms. Liam, having provided that background, asked whether, now it was a private operation, OTC should start to charge for its use of the field. Tony Evans was concerned that the email stated when the camps would be held rather than asking permission for them to be held. Councillors decided to let the camps proceed this year free of charge, review, then consider charging next year.

    Licence applications
    OTC had received licence applications for the Bull Hotel and the Cherry Tree, both in the High Street, and Gabriella’s in the Market Place. All were supported, mostly because Councillors welcomed the new establishments and partly because they felt MKC didn’t really listen to OTC’s views on licensing anyway.

    Skate Park
    This item was to discuss the assessment of possible sites for the Skate Park. Tony Evans reported that the process had started a few weeks ago, but that work relating to the Neighbourhood Plan had delayed it. So, the item was postponed until the next meeting.

    Waste on Goosey Island
    As reported previously, there is a growing problem with illegal structures and the deposit of waste by the landowner on Goosey Island. Action on this is painfully slow, but the Head of Environment at MKC has agreed to look at the issue in detail. Peter Geary, noting that solving the problem would require action from both MKC and the Environment Agency, felt OTC needed to get the two bodies working together in order to address it.

    Deputy Town Clerk
    Jeremy Rawlings welcomed Jane Brushwood, the new Deputy Town Clerk.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    OTC will remind the Recreation Ground gate key holders that it’s meant to be kept locked, with vehicles limited to 5MPH on site. The yellow lines near the junction of Chantry Rise with Weston Road are faded and broken, leading to people parking on them. MKC will be asked to investigate. The open space off Stonemason’s Close is seeing some damage because, when it’s busy, cars are parking with two wheels on the grass. OTC’s groundsmen will investigate and recommend a solution. As reported before, The Youth Centre has now been withdrawn from the Community Asset Transfer scheme. Steve Clark noted that the Centre has a small pot of money to work from and that, with its only income being from local users, he didn’t know what would happen to the Centre when the pot was empty. Desmond Eley noted that the building required more than £100K of remedial work. Finally, Peter Geary explained that, if MKC wished to sell the Centre, they’d need to offer it to the local community to buy for six months before selling it elsewhere. He also asked whether MKC would wish to sell it for use as a Doctors' Surgery (as outlined in the Neighbourhood Plan). Next Meeting - 4th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th September, in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    There is not normally a Council Meeting in August

    True to form, there was no Council Meeting in August.


    Public Participation

    Such was the popularity of this month’s meeting that Mercury had difficulty finding a seat. There were a record number of seven members of the public wishing to speak. Christine Platt First up was Christine Platt, who thanked the members of Olney Town Council (OTC) and Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Ward Councillors for their assistance in getting the pavements in Oakdown Crescent resurfaced. Despite their unsightly state, MKC’s Highways Officers had decided that they did not reach ‘intervention levels’ for repair. The MKC ward councillors have persuaded them otherwise and repairs should be carried out over the next few weeks. Mike Totton Next to speak was Mike Totton from the Allotments Association. Mike outlined the work of the society over the last 15 years and explained the dramatic development which occurred three years ago when the Community Allotment was set up. This had enabled mature, disabled and young people to get involved. An eco-toilet has now been installed, which was due to be officially opened by MP Mark Lancaster on 16th September. It was agreed that Mayor Jeremy Rawlings would also attend. Joanne Eley Joanne Eley asked what facts did OTC think that the MKC Ward Councillors had got wrong in their statement prior to the recent Neighbourhood Plan referendum. The question was noted. Lynda Batty Lynda Batty, on behalf of FOLIO (Friends of the Library) asked that the noticeboard at the back of The Olney Centre be moved, as it is hidden by rubbish bins on collection day. If it can be moved nearer to the post box it is more likely to be seen, she said. Sue Lamming said she had lived in the town for 35 years and thought the hanging baskets and flower beds were currently looking splendid. However, she also said that the bus shelter is full of cobwebs and is a disgrace, as is the town bridge and the estate where she lives is full of weeds and the pavements are in a bad state of repair. Peter Geary said that MKC are responsible for killing weeds and they only do this once a year.  Andy Davis Andy Davis spoke about the Section 106 funding (‘Planning Gain’), which is due to be received as a result of the Yardley Road development agreed in the Neighbourhood Plan. He urged the council to find ways to fully engage with the public and pledged his own support in any way he could provide it. Anne Walker Anne Walker, MKC’s Service Manager for Older People spoke about the Kitchener Centre. She said a few years ago the centre was under threat of closure but is now running well. She said that she would like to find ways of using it during weekend and evenings in order to bring in more revenue. This was an agenda item later in the meeting where it was agreed that an article would be produced for The Phonebox. Like the majority of residents Mercury has never been inside the centre. Could an open day be used to increase awareness, he wondered?

    unknown
    Olney Allotments Toilet

    Community Circular Walk
    Colin Rodden gave an update on the project, assisted by Mike Totton from the Allotment Association as well as Tom Jones and Amanda Molcher from The Cowper and Newton Museum. The vision is to have a series of walks looking at all that Olney has to offer. The walks will provide a whole day’s experience, encouraging visitors to see the cultural attractions and visit the shops and restaurants.

    Neighbourhood Plan S106 agreements
    This is a sum of money that developers are required to pay to the planning authority (MKC) and is spread across such things as schooling, health, recreation, amenities and public art. Joe Stacey reported that now the Plan has been formally adopted the Steering Group will now be replaced by a Development Committee, the first meeting of which will take place on 25th September. It is likely that this committee will consist of six councillors and six lay members and will consider, amongst other things, how to allocate the Section 106 funding. Peter Geary felt it was important that the needs of the town resulting from the new development be considered. The money can be spent over a period of ten years and Peter said it was important that some should be kept in reserves so that OTC reserves are not used in launching projects. Helena Newbold suggested that the breakdown of how funds are allocated to the individual categories is made available to residents via the OTC website. Joe Stacey felt it important not to under-estimate the amount of work involved and suggested that it might be necessary to engage a consultant.

    Skate park site assessment
    A number of sites have been considered, all with pros and cons, which have been identified in a document produced by Town Clerk Liam Costello. They are the recreation ground, the allotment field, Johnsons Field, The Pyghtle and Emberton Park. The site preferred by OTC is the allotment field, mainly due to its accessibility and distance from any housing. Colin Rodden was concerned about the remoteness of the site and Mike Totton, from the public gallery, expressed his concern at the impact on the small parking area available to allotment holders and that it might lead to a return of the vandalism experienced some years ago. Tony Evans said it was unfortunate that OTC had given the skateboard committee the impression that the current site of the zip wire on the recreation ground was the best location but further investigation had shown that it was not suitable. He thought that Emberton Park would be the best site, where a much larger facility could be built. Steve Clark reminded members that the park is actually owned by MKC and if there were any serious thoughts of locating the skate park there it was important to consult with Emberton Parish Council. Desmond Eley said that whatever site was chosen it was important that there is a water supply nearby, since OTC would be responsible for the upkeep and it would be necessary to regularly wash it down for safety reasons. Peter Geary was concerned that the allotment field is liable to flood and since much of the facility would be below ground it could fill with water. He suggested that OTC take pre-planning advice from MKC as there are planning regulations which might preclude some of the suggested sites. It was agreed to do this and discuss at the next meeting.

    Goosey erections
    Kevin Viney and Rosemary Osbourne have been in communication with Carole Mills, Chief Executive of MKC, about the unsightly scaffold, gates and rubbish on Goosey Island. The reply stated that because the gates are two metres in height they are classed as permitted development, even though the supporting scaffold is much higher, and therefore there is no action that MKC can take. The rubbish has now been put in builders’ bags, but the risk remains that flooding could result in it entering the river flow. This is the responsibility of the Environment Agency, who have no apparent concerns. The land owner also owns part of the larger southern island and Rosemary said that there was a possibility he may want to erect ‘no access’ signs. Peter Geary repeated his previous opinion that the only solution is to request that MP Mark Lancaster arranges a face to face meeting between MKC and the Environment Agency, since MKC seem to have ruled themselves out of any enforcement action. Additionally, OTC has been approached by solicitors for the land owner requesting that they sell their part of the Goosey. This was obviously rejected out of hand. It appears that he has divided his land into 21 plots that have been offered for sale as an investment for future building. Some of these plots have been sold and the aggregate value of the plots is believed to be in the region of £600k. Kevin expressed his opinion that this was a ‘shabby, speculative operation which was probably not even legal’. Desmond Eley asked if it would be possible for OTC to compulsory purchase the land. Peter Geary said yes, but it would need to be purchased for a particular reason, would be a five-year process and would involve paying the owner the market value. Kevin suggested that OTC should start the process of obtaining a public right of way along the entire bank of the southern island, which was agreed. The Clerk will write to the land owner’s solicitors formally rejecting their clients request to purchase the land and with a counter-offer of interest in purchasing his land.

    Parking outside One-Stop
    The MKC Ward Councillors have received a request from a resident requesting that a loading bay is provided outside One-Stop, to overcome the problem of traffic building up during deliveries. This way it could be managed in the same way as deliveries to the Carlton House Club. They passed it to the MKC Highways Dept who have considered the options and consulted OTC via an email. The email noted that any loading bay will require a Traffic Regulation Order, which would cost £2,056 and require consultation with all affected parties, including nearby residents who would lose parking outside of their properties and would probably object. Funding would be required for the implementation of the scheme. Peter Geary reminded members that this had been discussed by the council on previous occasions and if it was done for One-Stop, it would need to be done for all other businesses. There was a risk that Olney would end up with a High Street full of loading bays and no parking, he said. Colin Rodden suggested that One-Stop could be asked to make deliveries earlier in the day but Peter pointed out that there are deliveries from different suppliers during the day. Deirdre Bethune suggested that a loading bay could be situated outside of the Olney Centre, rather than outside residential properties. It was noted that the Carlton House Club does not have a formal loading bay, rather the manager cones off parking spaces the night before deliveries are due and removes them when complete, thus causing minimal disruption. It was agreed to seek the views of residents regarding provision of dedicated loading bays outside of the Carlton House Club and The Olney Centre.

    Joe Stacey
    Joe Stacey announced that he would be standing down from the council with immediate effect. He had notified the clerk of his intention to stand down in July but had stayed on to complete some outstanding work on the Neighbourhood Plan. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings formally thanked Joe for all his hard work on the plan and said he would be very sorry to see him go. As a result, a vacancy additional to that which will be filled by the forthcoming election now exists. If ten members of the electorate request that it be filled by an election, then it will be necessary to hold a further election, otherwise it will be filled by co-option.

    Market Place parking weight limit
    There has been considerable discussion on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook page about the stated weight limit of 1.5 Tonnes, which would preclude a number of family cars and all market traders’ vehicles. The previous notice stated 50 cwt but it appears that Napier Parking set it at 1.5 Tonnes when they were engaged to enforce the time limit restrictions. The original limit was set to prevent parking by lorries so Napier will be requested to amend the notices to 3.5 Tonnes.

    Odds and sods
    Peter Geary asked if any comments had been received about the new street lights in the High Street. Liam Costello said there had been complaints that they were originally too dim, but had now been increased in brightness by 30% and no further complaints had been received. Kevin Viney said there are still locations where the lights are obscured by trees, since the horizontal sections are shorter on the new post. The contractors had now agreed that power points for the Christmas lights could be fitted, he said.  Tony Evans reported that the grass cutting on Yardley Road by MKC stops half a mile short of the county boundary. The Pre-School have a requested a grant of £3,000 to assist with the £18,000 cost of resurfacing the play area and replacing equipment. The majority of the funding has been obtained from other community funds so OTC agreed to the request. Desmond Eley reported that a hearing-impaired resident had had a ‘near miss’ whilst crossing the road near the Hallelujah Lamp-post. This was due to the state of the pavement, but also due the speed of the traffic which is a particular problem late at night.  Sally Pezaro reported that the location code of the defibrillator at the recreation ground has been scratched off. Liam Costello replied that anyone dialling the emergency services would be provided with the access code. Next Meeting - 2nd October The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd October in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Public Participation

    Julia Clarke Julia Clarke was first to speak, explaining how hugely disappointing she found it that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) had pulled out of the recent public planning meeting in which the 250 home development was due to be discussed. She asked for assurance that the planning process would not proceed further until the meeting had been rescheduled and held. Peter Geary noted that MKC’s absence was due to the Planning Officer concerned being taken ill, then a communications breakdown meaning that an alternative Officer did not attend. He was then pretty forcefully interrupted by Tony Evans, saying that Officers should have attended. Liam Costello noted that Olney Town Council (OTC) was trying to rearrange the meeting within the next few weeks and would publicise the date when it was finalised. Sue Warren Sue Warren, speaking on her usual subject of Oakdown Crescent, thanked the Ward Councillors for getting some of the pathways resurfaced. Explaining that her fight would continue, she noted that people were already driving over them, which would likely mean they’d not last long. She concluded by asking if there was any news on the application from the Community Parking Fund. Liam replied in the negative, Peter Geary noting that it’d be at least a month until there was some. Ralph Terry Ralph Terry spoke about a proposed development of four, four-bedroomed houses off Moores Hill with access through the gap between nos. 61 and 63. A meeting of nearby residents had been held, with all attending being against the development. He cited the narrow entrance to the new development (disputing the builder’s figures), the narrowness of the main section of Moores Hill and the associated danger to pedestrians caused by pavement parking, as reasons OTC should object to the development, and urged it to do so. He felt the development would change the character of the road, and be a ‘cul-de-sac off a cul-de-sac’. He also noted that various people living close to the proposed development, within the zone in which MKC should have informed residents, had heard nothing about it. Maria Tennant Maria Tennant spoke on the subject of traffic concerns near Olney Middle School. Noting that Aspreys is a fast road, she felt that a zebra crossing was required across Aspreys, around 20m West of Woodpits Lane. She also felt that a part-time speed restriction outside the School would be beneficial, slowing traffic while pupils were entering and leaving the site. As it stood, she did not think it safe to let her child walk to or from the school unaccompanied. Philip Geech Philip Geech spoke next, noting that Olney had character and charm, primarily due to it having the right balance of architecture, people, community spirit and shops. He felt these helped make it a ‘destination’ town, but was concerned about that changing with a gradual influx of chain stores tending to make the town ubiquitous. He questioned whether they were appropriate and asked what OTC could do in this regard. As an example, he noted the change in the McColls store frontage for the addition of Subway, also asking what planning use class had been applied for. Neil Biggs Neil Biggs, a Traffic Management Officer from Thames Valley Police, asked whether the zebra crossing, discussed earlier by Maria Tenant, was related to the nearby 250 home development. He said that the related traffic survey had noted that crossing assistance would be needed, but he hadn’t seen what was being done to address it. Alan Smedley Alan Smedley spoke briefly to reinforce Ralph Terry’s view on the proposed Moores Hill development, and to ask why there was often such a long wait between pedestrians pressing the button on the lights at the Wellingborough Road crossing and the lights changing to let them cross. Finally, Colin Cook spoke, also in support of Ralph Terry’s views, noting that fire engines would be too wide to enter the proposed new development.

    Subway at McColls
    This item was to discuss the planning issues associated with the new Subway branch opening inside McColls on the Market Place. Regarding the frontage change, Peter Geary suggested OTC speak with MKC’s Planning Enforcement team in order to find out whether it was allowed without a Planning Application. In terms of Philip Geech’s views on chains, Peter explained that the Council had to make its decisions based on policy, for example whether another perhaps-hot food outlet in the area was one too many. There followed a short discussion on whether a change of planning use would need to be applied for – A1 being for shops, A3 for restaurants and cafés and A5 for hot food takeaways. Colin Rodden, agreeing with Philip Geech’s views on chains, explained that, with Tesco having taken business from McColls, the latter was now presumably trying to maximise the revenue from its floor space by utilising its partnership with Subway. Peter Geary felt OTC should seek advice on how to develop a policy to protect the town’s character. Jeremy Rawlings concluded the discussion, noting that OTC would seek advice on the Subway and policy issues.

    unknown
    Subway Frontage

    Section 106 consultation for 250 home development
    Peter Geary explained that the pictures in the Planning Application were illustrative only, the hard facts being limited to the development boundary, the entries and exits, and the Section 106 agreement. Thus, while a Community Centre had been mentioned, he felt clarification of who’d build it was required in writing before OTC gave its final view on the Planning Permission. Things like that needed to be tied down in the Planning Permission, he explained. Following on from the public meeting cancellation noted by Julia Clarke during the Public Participation section, Deirdre asked that OTC be given more time to compose its view on the development – the public meeting had not yet taken place and, in fact, its date still had to be agreed. Peter Geary said he’d be happy to request a delay to the planning decision but that, since it may result in MKC missing a Key Performance Indicator, it may prove unwilling to accede to the request. He noted that OTC should ideally submit its views to MKC by mid October, in time for MKC Officers to write a report for its November Planning Meeting. Colin Rodden sensibly noted that, with likely so little time available, some kind of project plan with milestones was needed. Jeremy Rawlings concluded the discussion, noting that OTC would request a delay.

    Aspreys zebra crossing
    This topic was to discuss the crossing issue raised by Maria Tennant earlier in the meeting. Colin Rodden noted that vehicle speeds on Aspreys were too high, with Thames Valley Police doing little to reduce them. He felt that a crossing would be a good use of part of the Section 106 monies from the nearby proposed 250 home development, although it may be required earlier than that money becoming available. Helena Newbold noted that she supported a crossing in this location. Continuing with his theme, Colin noted that, if people wanted to participate in reducing vehicle speeds, volunteers could be trained to use speed cameras under the Community Speedwatch programme. Neil Biggs, speaking briefly from the Public area, noted that an opportunity had been missed: When the traffic calming measures were agreed for the Ousedale build, they could have included the crossing. Peter Geary suggested the Council could ask Neil to look at any ideas or proposals.

    Public planning meeting postponement
    Mercury reports cover what happens during Council meetings, not outside them. However, every so often something is said, or not said, during a meeting which is worthy of further investigation. The postponement of the public planning meeting to discuss the 250 home development is a case in point. At a recent OTC Planning Committee meeting, it was decided to hold the public meeting. OTC asked the Ward Councillors to help it ensure that MKC officers attend the meeting, and was assured this help would be given. The meeting, organised by OTC, was due to take place on the evening of Thursday 28th September. That day Justin Booij, the MKC Senior Planning Officer due to attend, was unwell so he called and emailed OTC around midday to send apologies for himself and another Officer, Andy Swannel, and to say that “we will need to reconvene before the Council (MKC) determines the application”. Shortly after receiving that email, OTC decided to postpone the meeting and publicise its decision. But, if OTC had instead contacted MKC Officers or Ward Councillors, it would have learned that a replacement for Justin was in fact available and therefore the meeting could have gone ahead as planned. This has left both OTC and MKC frustrated, each seeing the issue in a different light. OTC contends that MKC did not make anyone else available, that it sent apologies for both Officers due to attend, and asked for alternative dates for the meeting to take place. MKC contends that OTC, as the organisers of an important time critical meeting, should have pushed back at MKC, for example talking with the Ward Councillors who’d assured it that Officers would attend the meeting, to see if other Officers were available. The new date for the public meeting is Thursday 26th October. While this will certainly be before MKC meets to determine the application, it’s unclear whether MKC will postpone that decision such that the MKC Officers’ report is written after the public meeting. So, both the choice of words in Justin’s email and the decision by OTC to postpone the meeting have turned out to be big calls. Thank you to Liam Costello and David Hosking for the above information.  Now back to the Council meeting...

    Goosey Bridge
    Kevin Viney introduced this topic, asking the Council to consider listing Goosey Bridge. A survey of the bridge had been performed and its keystone found, dating the bridge at 1795. Most buildings of a similar age are listed and, with the bridge having links with William Cowper, he felt it should be recognised and retained for future generations. Peter Geary noted that achieving listed status would make the bridge more expensive to work on. Councillors agreed to work towards achieving listed status for the bridge. Neil Biggs noted that there was a related technical point they must consider, and Jeremy Rawlings asked him to raise it after the meeting.

    Skate Park
    Progress on finding a suitable location has been painfully slow and, while the latest idea to site it in Emberton Park appeared broadly supported by MKC, it seems likely that Emberton Parish Council will be strongly opposed to it.

    One Stop deliveries
    Deliveries to One Stop can cause traffic problems in the High Street. David Hosking has been collecting local views and, as before, some would like a loading bay while others think the resulting lack of parking would be too big a disadvantage. If an easy solution exists, it’s certainly not been found yet. Jeremy Rawlings noted that, albeit once a week, the Monday 7.30am waste and recycling pickups by the dustmen probably caused more traffic problems than the deliveries.

    Goosey Island
    As reported previously, the problems of unsightly constructions and rubbish on Goosey Island continue. Peter Geary explained that MKC is working on the issue and, thus, it wouldn’t be productive for OTC to keep pushing it for progress. This was a complicated issue so progress would be slow, he felt.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    Colin Rodden asked why the Parish and small Town Councils don’t get together to keep the foot and cycle paths between them clear. This was felt a good suggestion, which will hopefully be followed up. Helena Newbold noted that, while canvassing house to house before the vote on the first vacant OTC position, Joanne Eley had often been told that OTC was too slow to respond to emails and letters. She felt the Council should have a Communications Policy, stating how soon responses could be expected. Next Meeting - 6th November The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th November in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Ron Bull

    Before the start of the meeting, members stood for a minute’s silence to remember former councillor and Deputy Mayor Ron Bull, who had recently passed away.

    Public Participation
    Christine Platt Christine Platt provided some photographs of the pathways in Oakdown Crescent which have recently been resurfaced. Because the parking situation had not been resolved she felt that the surface will not last long, which would be a waste of time and money. She asked if there was any progress on the request for funding from the Community Parking Fund. Later in the meeting Milton Keynes Councillor (MKC) Peter Geary said that there wasn’t. She said that on a recent visit to Newport Pagnell she had observed Traffic Wardens everywhere and asked if parking could be prevented at the bus stop on Weston Road, as it was not easy for bus drivers to see passengers waiting at the stop due to parked cars. Bob Spray Bob Spray spoke next about the request to provide a loading bay outside of One-Stop in the High Street. He said he had visited the shop to discuss it with the manager and had been only the third person to do so. He said he was appreciative of the issues, but the problem was caused by a lorry that arrives three times a week and unloads for a period of one hour maximum. Small trucks deliver more frequently, but they manage to park off-road or elsewhere. He suggested that perhaps the lorries could park in West Street and then unload via the footpath through Cobbs Garden. If the proposal for a dedicated loading bay went ahead the main beneficiaries would not be Olney residents but through traffic, he said. The losers would be residents and shoppers. This issue was an item on the main agenda and the mayor agreed that it should be discussed next.

    Feedback on loading bay for One-Stop 
    MKC Ward Councillor David Hosking explained that after a number of complaints from residents about traffic congestion being caused by unloading, an officer at MKC had suggested a dedicated loading bay and he was now able to provide feedback from an informal consultation which had recently taken place via Facebook. Some 116 comments had been received but, being the Olney Noticeboard, not all were relevant or repeatable. Of these, eight were in favour, but seven only mentioned safety and not congestion. 54 were not in favour, many of them suggesting other options. 28 were comments about the nearby pedestrian crossing so were not directly related. Many of the comments against concerned the removal of parking spaces and setting a precedent, and having dedicated delivery times outside of rush hour, which David thought would be difficult to enforce. He said that he and his fellow ward councillors would be meeting with the One-Stop Area Manager and Transport Team to agree a way forward.  Dierdre Bethune said that if the lorries park directly outside of One-Stop it causes a visibility problem to users of the nearby pedestrian crossing. If they were to park the other side of the crossing that would not occur, she said, but recognised it would be a longer walk for unloading. Steve Clark reminded members that when Tesco was applying for planning permission for their Market Place premises, a condition was imposed that they used smaller lorries to prevent congestion. He wondered if One-Stop could be requested to do the same. Kevin Viney suggested that the problems with the crossing could be alleviated by replacing it with a traffic light controlled puffin crossing. Colin Rodden said that because the spotlights on the crossing are out of action, it is difficult for approaching drivers to see pedestrians waiting to cross at night, the problem having been reported to MKC who are responsible for repairs. This then lead on to an unrelated discussion about the slow response of the Whirly Pit crossing lights, which MKC has agreed to address. Bringing things back on track, Peter Geary was of the opinion that even if a loading bay was installed it would have to be enforced and therefore wouldn’t work. Dierdre Bethune tabled a proposal that the council do not proceed with providing a loading bay which was passed on a vote.

    Consultation on Proposed Submission version of Plan:MK
    The council had received an email from MKC regarding Plan:MK which is the new strategic development plan for Milton Keynes outlining how the Borough will grow through to 2031 and is MKC’s new Local Plan to provide homes, jobs and infrastructure that will be needed. It will be submitted to the Government in spring 2018 for independent examination and there is a period of public consultation from 8th November until 20th December. 26,500 new homes will be built over the next 15 years and land has been identified east of the M1 for 5,300 new houses, although those are not due to be built until after 2031. However, the plan states that this may come forward once decisions on the new Cambridge to Oxford Expressway are made and if the council are struggling to provide enough housing elsewhere. Peter Geary was concerned about this latter aspect and reminded councillors that a group of developers are pressing for a substantial industrial site at the top of Chicheley Hill, which is not included in the Sherrington Neighbourhood Plan and both would bring Milton Keynes much closer to Olney. Having said that, it was important that positive comments about Plan:MK should also be submitted, he said. The email offered parish councils an unstaffed exhibition explaining the proposals and also said that officers would be open to attending parish council meetings. It was agreed to accept both offers and start December’s meeting half an hour earlier at 7.00 pm in order accommodate the latter.

    Bill for by-election held on 5th October
    MKC has presented Olney Town Council (OTC) with a bill for £6,691 to cover the cost of the by-election held on 5th October. There is no budget for this, so if paid in the current F/Y would need to come out of reserves. Peter Geary said that when the charge was introduced it was agreed that it could be carried over into the next F/Y when the council can raise the precept (element of Council Tax) to pay for it. In view of the second forthcoming election, which had been requested by residents, a proposal was made to approve £13,382 and seek to delay payment until next year, which was passed on a vote. Tony Evans questioned the cost, asking was it really necessary to have 12 people manning the three polling stations for such a minor election with a predicted low turnout. Peter said that the main cost is in mailing out polling cards and postal votes.

    Wicker Ladies
    As previously reported the two wicker ‘Pancake Ladies’ in the Market Place are being replaced by more substantial wire versions at a cost of £1,800 each, and the council hope that funding can be found from MKC’s Public Art budget. The first is progressing well, but the council decided to delay ordering the second so that the first can be reviewed. Tony Evans reminded members that while the wicker originals were flammable the replacements would be metal and portable, so it was important that they were well cemented in.

    Odds and Sods
    MKC is carrying out a review of polling districts and places. OTC are happy with their existing arrangements of two stations in the Olney Centre and one in the United Reformed Church. For the last two years OTC have paid £6,000 to MKC to fund six hours of library staff time per week. Dierdre Bethune said that OTC had originally said that they would only provide the funding on a one-off basis, but it was right and proper that they should continue to do so, so funding was approved for another year. McColls/Subway have submitted a retrospective planning application for the changes they have already made to the front of the premises. Gabriella’s Dolci and Cucina on the Market Place has applied for increased alcohol hours until 23.00 Tuesday to Saturday and 12.00 to 21.00 Sunday. The council raised no objection. Desmond Eley reported that the power sockets on the newly replaced lampposts still hadn’t been installed. These sockets are necessary to power the Christmas lights. It was agreed to chase MKC to ensure that the contractors complete the work in time for the late-night shopping and Dickens events. Colin Rodden thanked everyone who had been involved in organising the previous night’s firework display. He also noted that fly tipping was taking place at the lay-by on the way to Weston Underwood and that the road surface in East Street was in a very poor condition. Peter Geary said it was important that any hole deeper than 50mm was reported to MKC via their website. Kevin Viney reported that the Market Place toilets are in a bad state and suggested a deep clean. There has been no response from the owner of the Goosey to OTC’s request to purchase his land. Rosemary Osbourne said she had received a lot of feedback from residents which will help with the proposal to create a right of way along the riverbank. Next Meeting - 4th December The next meeting will be held at 7.00pm on Monday 4th December in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Public Participation

    Sue Warren Sue Warren was first to speak, on her regular topic of parking in Oakdown Crescent. Furious that Orchard Rise had been granted a Parking Permit scheme while the Crescent had not, she felt there was one rule for people with money living in expensive houses and one for the poor and elderly. She felt Olney Town Council (OTC) had interfered with the Oakdown Crescent scheme – presumably by broadening the set of homes to be surveyed beyond just those in the Crescent, an action not taken for the Orchard Rise scheme. She stated that the elderly people living in the Crescent deserved an apology from the Council, and suggested Councillors go and see them to ask what they think of the Council. Finally, she took the Council to task for laughing at her sister, Christine Platt, during last month’s meeting.

    unknown
    Parking in Oakdown Crescent

    John Bates Second to speak was John Bates, who made two formal requests to the Council. First, he asked for a full debate on the Neighbourhood Plan to establish its shortcomings and agree amendments to protect the town from excessive development projects through to 2031. Second, he asked the Council to withdraw support from the 250 home development to the West of Aspreys. He felt that this development fell short of the obligations required by the Plan: It would very likely result in the 300 home target being exceeded and would not provide sufficient funding for infrastructure and the promised community building.

    Welcome and congratulations
    Jeremy Rawlings opened the meeting by welcoming the two new Councillors, Chris Tennant and Paul Collins. Later in the meeting, he also read out a letter from David Hosking, absent from this meeting, which noted that those willing to stand and campaign for election deserved credit and that he looked forward to working with them. Jeremy congratulated Sally Pezaro, also absent, on the recent birth of her and Mike’s baby daughter.

    Plan:MK presentation
    Andrew Turner, a Senior Planning Officer at Milton Keynes Council (MKC) gave a talk on the proposed submission version of Plan:MK. Only a brief summary of the talk is given here but, to learn more, surf to https://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/planning-and-building/planning-policy/plan-mk. Plan:MK contains the strategy to meet MK Borough’s development needs until 2031. He explained that part of the plan was to allocate more land to ensure a five year housing supply and that, while there was currently sufficient land for this purpose, that state of affairs was vulnerable because of appeals against developments and scrutiny over how the amount of land required was calculated. He noted Plan:MK would strengthen Neighbourhood Plans, and that a robust land supply was required to fend off speculative development. Across the Borough, 26,500 new homes are required until 2031, 19,725 of which are planned already, leaving the remainder, 6,775 homes, to be built in new allocations. The bulk of the development would be in the expansion areas East and West of Milton Keynes. Andrew explained that the Borough is short on land for large format warehouses but had enough land in general. A large area of land East of the M1 and South of Newport Pagnell is identified as a strategic reserve site for homes and businesses after 2031 – although government infrastructure funding to improve transport links across the M1 towards Milton Keynes will be required for this to move forward. Finally, he noted that planning for the Oxford to Cambridge Expressway, although shrouded in uncertainty, was progressing, with a decision on the corridor it would follow from Oxford to Milton Keynes being due Summer 2018.

    Questions on Plan:MK
    Once Andrew had finished his presentation, he took questions, some of which are covered here. Des Eley asked if the Plan contained any intent to improve public transport between Olney and Milton Keynes. Andrew replied that this did not fall within Plan:MK’s remit, it being more relevant to the MK Mobility Strategy 2018-2036, out for consultation until the end of January. Peter Geary pointed out that Milton Keynes wanted industry other than ‘big automated sheds’ (large format warehouses), as these occupied large areas but provided few jobs – and providing jobs was the aim. Noting that a site near Sherington is being considered for a warehouse style development and thus would impact traffic on the A509, he asked what Councillors should do to oppose it. Andrew suggested they say that the current sites provide sufficient employment, that new ones are not required and that the additional A509 traffic would cause a problem. Kevin Viney asked if rural areas with ‘made’ Neighbourhood Plans, such as Olney, should feel a real sense of security, as there’d be no development ‘surprises’ there or in the surrounding areas. Andrew replied that Olney’s Plan would stand, up to 2031, irrespective of Plan:MK, with the latter taking the rug from under speculative developments. He also noted that both Plans will need to be reviewed in five years’ time. Peter Geary asked whether, for rural areas with no ‘made’ Neighbourhood Plans, there’d be no further housing allocation. The reply was neither a straight ‘yes’ or a straight ‘no’. Helena Newbold asked what would happen if, for example, a farmer owning land just beyond the proposed 250 home development west of Aspreys was to sell it to a developer. Peter Geary replied that they wouldn’t get planning permission unless Plan:MK changes or Milton Keynes suddenly has an insufficient five year land supply.

    Planning and Development Committees
    A decision was made recently to merge the Planning and Development Committees. Councillors now thought that was incorrect, so voted to separate them, with all in favour bar Deirdre Bethune against. The Development Committee, previously termed the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group, has seen the balance between Council and Public membership skew towards the former as members of the public have left or, in one case, joined the Council. Councillors agreed that a ratio of 10 Councillors to five Public should be aimed for, with the detail of how to achieve it being left to the Committee.

    250 home development
    Jeremy Rawlings will attend the MKC planning meeting on 14th December to speak about the proposed 250 home development. People from the public area can’t speak in favour and, with OTC broadly pro the development, Jeremy’s contribution will instead be to promote the need to clarify the situation with regard to the proposed community building. The developer has stated it will create the building, but information on it, such as size and facilities, is scarce and it’s unclear how it will sit with the developer’s Section 106 contribution.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Deirdre Bethune opened the discussion, noting that the current situation was embarrassing and unfair. Peter stated that OTC needed to know when MKC was going to deliver funding for the parking improvements. Liam noted that he’d very recently chased MKC, and Peter said he’d do the same within the week. Peter also asked that the record be corrected: The Oakdown Crescent Residents Parking Scheme was rejected because it didn’t achieve the required 70% agreement from those polled.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    Currently, the only electrical outlets on the Market Place are near the toilet block, resulting in a maze of overhead cabling on market days to supply power to all the stalls. OTC has been working towards providing outlets spread around the area, and it’s hoped the two weeks’ work can be completed in January. It’s possible that one or two Thursday Markets may be cancelled as a result, but any decision will be taken in consultation with the market traders. Tony Evans noted that the replacement wire version of the ‘wicker ladies’ looked very good – a fantastic job had been done. Progress on the structures and waste material on Goosey Island continues to be slow. Peter Geary explained that there were two relevant methods of enforcement – via the planning route and the Environment Agency. The first was acknowledged to be a slow process, but Kevin Viney will invite the latter agency to a site meeting, with Peter assuring him that an MKC planning enforcement officer will also attend. Kevin noted that the Goosey right of way application was progressing well. Deirdre stated that Dickens of a Christmas had been a very successful event. She thanked the Council staff, who organise much of the event behind the scenes, for their work.

    Neighbourhood Plan
    Although not specifically an agenda item, the level of controversy over the Neighbourhood Plan means it keeps ‘popping up’, this time within the Members Matters item, in which Councillors air areas of concern. Most of the discussion was centred on a contribution from Phil Geech. Although this wasn’t read out until part way through, it’s clearer to cover it first, followed by the resulting discussion. Phil had requested the statement be read verbatim. Joanne Eley did that and the full text is below:
    “There has recently been some consternation surrounding a proposed development at Aspreys and the Neighbourhood Plan that encompasses it. Whilst the planning application is within the purview of Milton Keynes Council and will be addressed elsewhere the Neighbourhood Plan falls within the remit of Olney Town Council. I submit that, given new information that is available and some concerns over the conduct of the campaign, that a review is not only desirable but essential to ensure that the will of residents is properly understood. I would therefore ask two things of the Council:  Will you support a review of the Neighbourhood Plan?  In the interests of transparency will you ensure that no party concerned in the original plan is part of such review and that a balance of membership is between Council members and interested residents? I would ask that the question and answers to both are formally minuted.”
    Jeremy Rawlings noted that only minor changes to the Plan were possible, the law not allowing major ones. He felt the Plan would have to be started again if significant changes were required. Peter Geary explained that, even if such work started now, it’d not be possible to remove items from the existing (and ‘made’) Plan. Chris Tennant noted that the locality website has a FAQ section where this point is dealt with, see the last question on mycommunity.org.uk/help-centre/faqs/np/. While there are various caveats, the main thrust of its answer is “Currently, to update a made Neighbourhood Plan it is necessary to go through the same process as done for making the original Neighbourhood Plan, including pre-submission consultation, submission to local authority, independent examination and referendum.” Joanne noted that Phil Geech had talked to a barrister about the issue, prompting Chris Tennant to reply that if Phil had legal evidence, “let’s see it”. Next Meeting - 8th January The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 8th January in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.

    ------

    Mercury's reports for 2018

    ·    January 2018

    Mercury Report:
    Olney Town Council There was an unusually low turnout of members for this month’s meeting with only nine being present. Public participation First to talk was Hillary Terry on the subject of the re-submitted Planning Application for four 4-bed houses with detached double garages behind numbers 63 & 65 Moore’s Hill. She said the main difference to the original application appeared to be an alleged wider access to the site and did not know of any residents in Moore’s Hill who think this application should be approved. There had been a recent residents’ meeting at which five Moore’s Hill households were represented, plus one from Dinglederry and three from Maybush Walk, with several apologies from others who also feel very strongly that this application should be turned down. Moore’s Hill is a sub-standard single width road of between 3.75 and 3.85m, and vehicles are required to drive on the pavement to pass. Both driving on, and parking on, the pavement is dangerous to pedestrians. It is often the case that pedestrians with children in push chairs need to walk in the road because of cars parked on the pavement. The situation is further aggravated enormously by the proximity to Olney Middle School, when Moore’s Hill becomes a car park and there is barely room to get a small car between the rows of parked cars. Building four extra houses will further aggravate the traffic problems in this road,  she said. The application is misleading and inaccurate, she felt. The developer is now proposing to demolish part of No. 63, without giving any details, suspecting the removal of the downstairs toilet. Hillary called into question the extra width the developer alleges for the proposed site access and pointed out that the boundary with Maybush Walk properties is incorrectly drawn on the application. Access is also hampered by a hedge which gives a difficult, if not blind, exit, not to mention the fact that traffic going in would be head-on to traffic going out. Although the applicant claims to have considered parking, in reality he is reducing parking for 63 and removing it completely for 65, Hillary said. She concluded by saying that the proposed development would be totally out-of-character with the houses in Moore’s Hill, thus fundamentally altering the character and nature of Moore’s Hill, an historic development long known for its old houses and spacious gardens. It is ill-advised, ill-conceived, dangerous and unsuitable, she said. Ralph Terry briefly spoke next, reiterating to points made by Hillary and asking that Olney Town Council (OTC) recommends rejection of the revised plan at the next meeting of the Planning Committee. He said that a more detailed document had been provided to that committee detailing where the plan was contrary to Milton Keynes Council’s (MKC) own planning guidelines.

    unknown
    Moores Hill

    Finally, Sue Warren spoke on the subject of the parking situation in Oakdown Crescent. Sue repeated her firm belief that OTC had interfered in the request for a residents’ parking scheme by requesting that residents of Weston Road were included in the survey. Why were residents of West Street not included in the survey for a parking scheme in Orchard Rise, she asked. Ward Councillor Peter Geary’s assertion that OTC did not interfere was ‘ludicrous’, she said. Sue said she would wait till the end of the year when she would apply again, only this time she would not inform OTC,  as the residents of Orchard Rise hadn’t. She presented some photos which showed the scale of the problem, unlike the photo in the December edition of The Phonebox which appeared to have been taken in the middle of a weekday when it was not a problem. She concluded by asking if there was any news on funding from the MKC Community Parking Fund, which had been expected months ago. Town Clerk Liam Costello said that there would not now be any funding from that source. Later in the meeting Peter Geary said he and a number of other MKC councillors and officers had recently attended a site visit but the reception they had received from the residents had put back their case considerably.

    Events Requests had been received to hold a number of events on the recreation ground, all of which have been approved:
    ● The annual Riverfest (raft race) on Sunday 1st July. ● Riverfest Rocks – a public charity fundraising music event in the Riverfest Marquee on the night of Saturday 30th June. ● The Olney 5km Stagger Race on 12th May to raise funds for the NSPCC.
    Bollards and weight limit in Silver End MKC has recently received a complaint relating to lorries mounting the pavement outside No. 4 East Street and is proposing to install bollards outside, similar to the bollards installed outside The Swan. They are also proposing a 3.5t weight limit from the Market Place, along Silver End until just beyond the property. Whist broadly in agreement with the bollards, members were concerned that the weight limit might cause problems elsewhere, meaning that large vehicles would gain access to businesses by travelling south along the length of East Street, or even via Church Street and Coneygere. OTC will write to MKC with their concerns.

    unknown
    East Street

    Community Hall on new development At the last meeting of the MKC Development Control Committee the planning application for 250 new houses west of Yardley Road was deferred, due to outstanding issues with the section 106 contribution for the community hall. Chris Tennant reported on meetings that had subsequently taken place between himself, MKC ward councillors, officers from MKC and the applicant, where the focus had been on what would be required by the community. The applicant is proposing a building with a total floor area of 150m2, the hall area being 100m2. Tony Evans supported the proposal but was concerned that access would be via the new housing estate and might create access and parking problems. Peter Geary said that the building design need to allow for future extension and should consider residents that do not play sports. This led on to a discussion around the proposed provision of playing fields with either grass or 3G/4G synthetic turf. The problem with the latter, he said, was that it would have a maximum lifespan of 10 years and would cost a six-figure sum to eventually replace. Maintenance needs to be agreed from day one, otherwise the replacement cost would fall to OTC. Colin Rodden thought that the proposal should go out to public consultation, but Peter said there was no time for that because the DCC meeting will be held on 8th February and necessary reports will need to be in place by the end of January. A vote was taken on the community hall proposal and passed by a majority.
    250th anniversary of William Cowper and Mrs Unwin moving to Olney To celebrate this event the Cowper and Newton Museum will be holding a showcase event at the Carlton House club on 15th February to which supporters of the museum and various dignitaries will be invited. OTC agreed to pay £250 towards the cost of catering for the event. Odds and sods Rosemary Osbourne reported that the double yellow lines on the Weston Road/Chantry Rise junction were fading leading to them being ignored. Peter Geary reported that MKC had appointed a new Deputy Monitoring Officer responsible for enforcing the laws on declarations of members personal interests. His view is that when such matters are discussed the member must leave the meeting, which is not what currently happens with OTC where the member remains but may take no part in discussions. He also reported that the MKC budget is currently being discussed.  Proposals are: ● A 6% rise in Council Tax ● Grit bins will not be filled ● Graffiti squads cut from 4 to 3 ● £500k cut from road resurfacing budget ● Pot hole repair budget cut by 15% or £100k. Also, removal of 28 day timescale for holes greater than 50mm deep. Currently if a repair is made within 28 days of a hole being reported MKC do not have to pay compensation for vehicle damage. Members were concerned on the impact of this measure. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings was concerned that MKC have been ‘slipping in’ LED replacement street lights without consulting OTC. The standard replacement is an eight-point high intensity array with no diffuser, he said (Mercury had noted that that particularly bright lamp at the top of Spring Lane is actually a double array of 16). Tony Evans reported that there is a large road depression on the route of the pancake race. Kevin Viney reported that collection of evidence to provide a right of way over the privately owned section of The Goosey is progressing well. A report on the proposed weight limit on the bridge is due at the end of the month. A meeting with the Environment Agency to discuss the unauthorised structure and rubbish is being held on 15th January. A new gate, including a pedestrian gate, is being erected on the Weston Road entrance. Work to upgrade the electricity supply on the Market Place has been delayed until March.

    unknown
    Cowper & Newton Museum

    The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.

    ·    February 2018

    Olney Council report for 5th February 2018


    Public Participation

    Sue Warren Sue Warren was first to speak, on the topic of parking in Oakdown Crescent. She stated again that the reason Oakdown Crescent wasn’t granted a parking permit scheme was that Olney Town Council (OTC) had insisted on Weston Road residents being included in the survey. Noting that OTC existed to improve the lives of Olney residents, she said this seemingly did not apply to those in Oakdown Crescent, Deirdre Bethune being the only Councillor to speak with them about the parking problem. She advised the Council that she’d made a formal complaint to the Local Authority Ombudsman regarding how OTC handled the application for parking permits in Oakdown Crescent, compared with the successful application for Orchard Rise. Christine Platt Christine Platt, Sue’s sister, then spoke briefly on the same topic. She noted that the Phonebox Magazine had reported Peter Geary as saying that he and other Councillors had visited the Crescent but that the reaction of those they spoke with had put back their case considerably. In her view, it was instead the case that, while Councillors had spoken with the residents, they did not want to hear what they had to say. Peter Geary Peter Geary responded to this specific issue. He took a group of Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Officers on a site visit to the Crescent in an attempt to convince them that work needed to be done to alleviate the parking problem. He stated that, factually, the Officers had been less impressed by the residents’ case after the visit than before. Addressing Sue and Christine, he stated that they needed to work with the Council in order to move the situation forward - their current approach was not helpful, he said. He concluded by saying that he supported them contacting the Ombudsman. If they had a problem, that was a sensible way to address it.

    Events
    The Council gave permission for Cherry Fair to be held on Saturday 16th June on The Glebe, and for Motorama to be held on Sunday 10th June on the Market Place.

    New development and Community Hall
    This topic concerns the planning application for the site to the West of Yardley Road. First, some background kindly provided by Liam Costello after the meeting. The planning application is for “Outline permission (with all matters reserved except access) for the residential development of 250 dwellings and associated public open space, car parking and community facilities including a multi-use community building”. This means that the applicant is seeking permission for the principle of those items, with their detail to be agreed at a subsequent more detailed application termed a “Reserved Matters Application”. So, the only things due to be agreed and set in stone at this stage are the highway access details and the Section 106 (S106) agreement. With regards to the S106, the MKC Development Control Committee (DCC) will approve the heads of terms of the S106 at their committee meeting, and afterwards solicitors for MKC and the developer will agree the S106 arrangement, which is a binding legal document. Now back to the meeting. Chris Tenant reported that he, Peter Geary, David Hosking, Tony Evans and Liam Costello had met with Providence Land and MKC Officers on a number of occasions to progress the Community Hall item. This covered the scope, layout, form, design and principle of the proposed building, along with the Section 106 package, due to be assessed by the DCC on Thursday 8th February. He noted that all this was “indicative” meaning that, as explained above, the precise detail of the Community Hall will not be agreed at this stage. Peter Geary noted that, in the amenity area, one of the two sports areas will be laid out as a pitch, while the other will remain the property of Providence Land, effectively their ‘lever’ to help secure the remainder of the Site E development area, which is essentially the remaining Westerly section of the Southernmost field of the overall development. Tony Evans noted that this second sports area needn’t be a pitch and could, for example, be a running track - although OTC would need to pay for the work required to achieve this.  Chris and Peter then covered the ‘phasing’ of the amenities becoming available versus the houses being built. The application currently commits to this happening only after 180 dwellings are built which, assuming a build rate of 50 dwellings per year, could be in around seven or eight years’ time. OTC would prefer, and will push for, a figure of more like 125 dwellings (50% of the total), thus ensuring that the first buyers have the benefit of the facilities earlier. Chris noted that the build rate would not be linear. For example, much infrastructure work would be required before the first house was built. He also noted that the foot and cycle path to Aspreys was similarly slated to be available only after 180 dwellings had been built, and this was not nearly early enough. Peter felt that this was fine tuning, on which he felt the developer would likely compromise. Note: In their meeting of Thursday 8th February, MKCDCC unanimously resolved to grant outline planning permission (with all matters reserved except access) for the residential development of up to 250 houses and associated public open space, car parking and community facilities including the multi-use community building.

    unknown

    How Olney’s new Community Centre may look. Supplied by David Hosking

    unknown

    unknown
    Edgar Mobbs Close off of East Street. Right: Edgar Mobbs


    Section 106 Museum and Archives monies
    Paul Collins, Councillor and trustee of the Cowper & Newton Museum, proposed that it administer the Museums and Archives part of the Section 106 monies from local developments, currently £58,924 assuming the new 250 dwelling development. He noted that the Council nominates two people on the Museum board. Peter Geary asked Paul to confirm that the Museum would effectively have oversight of where the monies were spent, rather than necessarily spending them on itself. Paul confirmed this, and Councillors voted unanimously in favour, bar Paul who was not allowed to vote.

    Goosey Island
    Kevin Viney provided an update on the temporary structures on Goosey Island. The deadline for the removal of these structures expires in March and, if not heeded, MKC Planning Enforcement will take action at the owner’s expense. Further, the Environment Agency (EA) will write to the owner to remind him that, while temporary permission for scaffold poles under the weak wooden bridge has been given, he must now submit a permanent proposal. High winds have torn off a section of a gate coated with anti-climbing paint, and it’s likely that this paint is dangerous to aquatic life. The EA has been informed, and concerned residents are advised to report the issue to its incident hotline.  Finally, a planning application has been submitted by the owner of Little Goosey Island to install a cattle grid and gates, the land deeds indicating that he is allowed to keep animals. While this is clearly a concern, Peter Geary noted that an application can only ever be assessed on its own merits so, if OTC was to recommend against it, it would need good planning grounds on which to do so.

    Budget and Precept
    Councillors voted unanimously to approve OTC’s budget for 2018-2019. This includes an increase in its precept by 2.99% to £190,585 which, for various reasons, will result in only a 2% increase in the part of your Council Tax bill which goes to OTC.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    The street name for the 14 house development off East Street will be either Edgar Mobbs Close or just Mobbs Close. OTC will take on the administration of the Hanging Baskets which furnish the High Street and nearby roads during the summer, Jeremy Rawlings noting the Council would review whether its office staff required additional help. OTC’s Planning Committee has objected to an application for a retail food store with up to 26 residential units on the land at the corner of Lavendon and Warrington Roads. That was because the site was allocated purely for retail development under the Olney Neighbourhood Plan, and it was important for the sustainable future of the town that retail space be available to meet its growing population’s future needs. Tony Evans passed on OTC’s best wishes to Jeremy Rawlings who, as Mayor, would be in Liberal, Kansas for the Pancake Race.

    Crossing outside One Stop
    Deirdre Bethune introduced this topic, explaining that she’d heard of further incidents involving drivers not seeing pedestrians about to cross. Other Councillors, including Jeremy Rawlings and Tony Evans, agreed the crossing was dangerous, and fair to neither pedestrians nor drivers due to a mix of lighting and nearby parking. Noting that OTC had to be clear about what action it wanted, Peter asked that all such near misses be reported with dates and times. That would help increase the priority of any improvements, he said.

    unknown
    Olney’s One Stop Crossing


    Councillor vacancy
    Although not discussed in this meeting, Liam Costello asked Mercury to note that OTC will look to fill a Councillor vacancy by co-option at its next full meeting on 5th March. If anyone would like to be considered, please contact the Council, 01234 711679 or townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, for details and an application form. Next Meeting - 5th March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.

    ·    March 2018

    Olney Council report for 5th March 2018

    Public Participation
    Ralph Terry First to speak was Ralph Terry. He thanked the members of Olney Town Council (OTC) for their continued support in objecting to the resubmitted planning application for additional houses in Moores Hill. Ralph said there were four other points he wished to make. The first was the matter of the huge pothole and puddle at the end of West Street which had been there for over a month. The second was about the new street lights in the High Street. The Olney crest had not been replaced on a significant number of them and one had been left as a cut off stump. Thirdly, the footpath from Johnsons Field to the Middle School was in a bad state being covered in vegetable matter with the bank falling away and trees growing over the path. Lastly, he said that dog mess was particularly bad along the path, which he and his wife use several times a day and both had resorted to picking up the mess themselves.  Mayor Jeremy Rawlings responded that the sawn-off stump was probably due to an existing lamppost which had been found to be very close to a gas main during replacement and Transco were due to investigate and rectify. Dierdre Bethune explained that all the crests were supposed to be replaced as part of the lamppost replacement scheme, but Ringway, Milton Keynes Council’s (MKC) service provider are yet to complete the job. Later in the meeting there was a discussion regarding responsibility for clearing leaves from footpaths, which generally is down to MKC. Tony Evans noted that the mobile sweeper did not appear to have visited for some time. Colin Rodden pointed out that many footpaths had never been formally handed over from the numerous developers to MKC so remain unadopted.  Ruth Ayling Next to speak was Ruth Ayling. Ruth said she understood that the Thursday Market was struggling for business and wondered if the opening hours were precluding many people from using it, who otherwise would. She suggested that perhaps it should be open later as a trial to see if it gets more use. Steve Clark noted that the recent bad weather had meant that some stalls had been unable to attend, and footfall had consequently been low. The suggestion of later opening will be put to the market traders.

    unknown
    The Olney Crest


    Co-option of new councillor
    A vacancy having arisen and there being no request from the electorate for an election to fill it, it fell to the council to fill the vacancy by co-option. Residents Graham Harrison and Mike Hughes had put their names forward and, both being present, were invited to introduce themselves prior to the secret vote. Graham spoke first explaining that he had stood unsuccessfully in the recent election but the support he had received had encouraged him to put himself forward for co-option. He said he had been an Olney resident for three years and prior to that had lived in Warrington for 35 years and been the Parish Meeting Chairman for the last 10, attending Rural Area Forum and Neighbour Action Group meetings. During this time he had, with others, successfully opposed the building of the Nun Wood wind farm and the supermarket at Warrington BP station. In 2016 he retired as a magistrate after 23 years. Mike said that he had been an Olney resident for 23 years. During the next few years the town will be going through momentous change and, having previously served as a councillor and mayor, felt that he had the experience and ability to once again be of service. He explained that he is currently OTC’s representative on the Petsoe End Windfarm Committee, a member of the Ann Hopkins Smith Alms House Trust and member of St Peter and St Pauls Church Fabric Committee. A secret ballot was held and Graham Harrison was elected by nine votes to four.

    Draft Framework for Parish and Town Councils to have an increased role in service delivery
    Desmond Eley explained that MKC have big budget restrictions and are looking to cut expenditure further when the current contract with Serco for some services expires in two years’ time. One of the proposals is for Parish and Town Councils to take on and pay for some services themselves. He felt that OTC needs to proactively get an understanding of what residents are prepared to pay for. Jeremy Rawlings said that the problem is that it is not yet clear what MKC are likely to be dropping. Steve Clark suggested that OTC should reply saying that they are keen to work with MKC but felt that recent experience with the transfer of landscaping responsibility and the abortive attempt by OTC to take over ownership of the Youth Club under the Community Asset Transfer scheme had been a bad experience. There was no guarantee that Olney would not get ‘shafted’ again, he said. Peter Geary said that OTC was in a better position to take on the work than many other local councils as it has its own ground staff. The current MKC Public Realm Service Director had come into the job with the intention of cutting many services but it had since become clear that they could not all be cut, he said. OTC has for some years been responsible for its own landscaping services on a devolved basis from MKC. Instead of paying Serco to do the work, as happens with most other parishes, MKC gives OTC a grant to do it on their behalf. There had been some concern that MKC could arbitrarily reduce this grant due to changes in their budget, so an ‘extension of and deed of variation to agreement’ document has been drawn up and will be signed by both parties. The agreement ensures that: ● The grant will be reviewed annually, rather than quarterly as proposed by MKC. ● Any variation in the grant at the annual review shall not reduce the grant below a level which would have been charged by Serco. ● Any disagreement resulting from the review will be referred to binding arbitration.

    Street naming
    Local historian and resident Elizabeth Knight had been approached by MKC to provide suitable street names for the proposed new developments in the town. She noted that a 1970s document identified a field in the Stilebrook area as ‘Foul Slough’ which Mercury thought particularly appropriate, given the proximity of the proposed houses to the sewage works. She also commented that the proposal to name the new development off East Street as Mobbs Close, after local sporting and WW1 hero Edgar Mobbs was very appropriate. This provoked a discussion initiated by Tony Evans as to whether his full name should be used. It was agreed that this would be more respectful and might provoke locals to investigate his life and achievements further.

    Silent Soldier Campaign
    The Royal British Legion are inviting sponsors to get involved in the campaign by donating to receive a ‘Silent Soldier’ silhouette to commemorate the end of WW1 and as a tribute to those who didn’t return and to those whose lives would never be the same again. Council agreed to donate a sum to be decided. The silhouette will probably be displayed at different locations around the town.

    Citizens Advice – Community Outreach Project
    OTC pays £4,400 each year so that Milton Keynes Citizens Advice can provide sessions for Olney residents once a fortnight at the Olney Centre. These sessions can be booked by calling the clerk or deputy clerk at the Olney Centre on 01234 711679. The report for July to December 2017 showed that 27 people had been helped to resolve and address 59 separate legal, financial and personal problems. Joanne Eley noted that the two detailed case studies appeared to duplicate what is provided by the health services and wondered if the service essential or just a ‘nice to have’. Peter Geary replied that since MKC no longer provided the funding the parishes had agreed to provide support so that the 2-3% of residents who need advice on issues such as housing can obtain it locally. These are the most vulnerable members of society, he said. Desmond Eley asked why MKC had withdrawn funding. Peter replied because they were short sighted and the easiest thing to cut in a financial crisis is such grants. John Boardman reminded members that the councils of surrounding villages had been approached to contribute to the funding, but none had done so meaning that residents of those villages were now directed to the service in Milton Keynes. Dierdre Bethune was concerned that residents of those villages were not being supported and suggested that they speak to their own parish councils in order to provide their own service. Peter Geary noted that the cost for signing up for a further three years would be £4,293 per year, a discount of just over £300 in total. He said it was important for the providers to have commitment as they needed the continuity to plan ahead and ensure that they had people in place with the right skills. He suggested that OTC renew for a further year with a view to extending to three years next time the contract was up for renewal, which was agreed

    Market Place CCTV
    This matter came up during the finance agenda item where it was questioned whether OTC is getting value for money for the annual fee. Jeremy Rawlings was of the opinion that the service had been miss-sold. Pictures from the camera are stored 24/7 on a memory card which can then be remotely accessed. It was agreed to look at the possibility of getting the camera centrally monitored by the police in Central Milton Keynes.

    unknown
    Market Place Power Bollards

    Odds and sods
    The installation of power bollards on the Market Place is due to run from 10th to 21st of March and will hopefully be complete by the time you read this. This work will enable market traders to connect to a power supply close to their stalls, instead of draping overhead cables back to the main power box by the toilets. A temporary fence on the new development on East Street is encroaching 2-3 metres on to the Youth Club field. The estates team at MKC will be informed. It was noted that the cobble stones have been removed from outside the front of The Bull and replaced with a resin and gravel surface as part of the redevelopment. However, this is in accordance with the submitted plans and has been done on health and safety grounds. It was noted that the water consumption on the allotments was unusually high and will be investigated. Next Meeting - 9th April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 9th April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.

    ·    April 2018

    Olney Council report for 9th April 2018

    Public Participation
    Sue Warren First to speak was Susan Warren who reported that the Local Government Ombudsman would be taking up her complaint about the way that OTC (Olney Town Council) and MKC (Milton Keynes Council) had dealt with the issue of parking in Oakdown Crescent. She said it was nice to see officers from MKC present at the meeting now that the Ombudsman would be investigating. Martin Allen Next to speak was Martin Allen on the subject of the High Street premises previously occupied by T A Bennett & Sons. He asked if members were aware of any planning applications for the premises and if not, could they ask the owner to paint the rather unattractive boarding. Members were not aware of any application at that time. Kate Bostock Next to speak was Kate Bostock. Kate said that the bay window of her house in Bridge Street has been struck by vehicles twice in the last four months, the latest in a long line of such incidents over many years and each time she has had to bear the cost of repairs. Although the road was repaired a few years ago the camber seems to be getting worse again, she said, and was concerned about the safety of pedestrians. She had spoken to the MKC Ward Councillors about the possibility of a speed restriction or bollards on the bend. Ken and Gill Simmond Last to speak were Ken and Gill Simmonds from Long Massey about speeding traffic on Aspreys. Ken said that the speed and noise of traffic was increasing and the recently installed Speed Indicating Device (SID) had recorded one vehicle traveling at 57 mph. He said there were an increasing number of lorries and works vehicles using Apreys and believed that some companies were advising their drivers to use Aspreys to avoid congestion in the High Street.  He asked when the data from the SIDs would be available and whether it would be made public.  Peter Geary agreed that the data should be made public but Town Clerk Liam Costello said that the raw data is not easily understandable. He would be happy to explain it to Ken and Gill, he said. Gill said that even the data from the SIDs would not be a true reflection of the speeds because she had observed vehicles slowing down when the drivers saw the SID.  Mayor Jeremey Rawlings said the usual procedure was for the SID data to be sent to Thames Valley Police (TVP) and they then decide if further action is necessary.  Colin Rodden said that there were plans to implement a community Speedwatch, which would be covered later in the meeting.

    Oakdown Crescent parking
    Present at the meeting were Bernie Ibekwem (Interim Highways Community Manager) and Naveed Ahmed (Senior Highway Liaison Officer). Bernie explained that he was new to the role and was attending to look at the issue, listen to concerns and then take to the next stage. When he’d first picked up the issue he was under the impression it had only been going on for around two years but having investigated further it was clear it had a much longer history. Sue Warren said she had been fighting to get it resolved for 10 years and Steve Clark said he had seen some minutes of a meeting 38 years ago where it had been discussed.  Dierdre Bethune asked Bernie how long his tenure was likely to be, as one of the problems seemed to be that too many temporary officers had promised action and then moved on. Bernie said it was ‘number one’ on his priorities and the new MKC Head of Highways was keen for the matter to be resolved. A plan had been produced some time ago but it appeared this had not been forwarded to OTC.  Peter Geary said he had seen a plan which involved turning the entire central area of the crescent into a car par park for 14 vehicles.  Sue Warren said the residents had been presented with a number of options and had chosen ‘Plan B’ which consisted of a central circle with one-way traffic. Naveed said that that plan did not pass the safety review, so the current plan allowed for just 11 vehicles and she then presented plans showing the proposed layout. Sue observed that the current ad-hoc arrangement allowed parking for 18 vehicles.  Jeremy Rawlings asked if the scheme would be fully funded by MKC and Bernie replied that the current ball-park figure was £30k split evenly between OTC and MKC.  Liam Costello said that an application had been made in the last financial year for funding from the MKC Community Parking Scheme, but no awards had been made that year. Sue noted that there was no dedicated disabled space or Doctor/Nurse bay. It was agreed that a disabled space could be provided and enforced, and an emergency vehicle bay could be marked out but wasn’t enforceable.  Peter Geary noted that MKC enforcement officers visit Olney on average three times a week so could be asked to enforce the scheme. A vote was taken as to whether the proposed plan was acceptable, which was passed unanimously.  Sue Warren said that next December she would be reapplying for a residents’ only parking scheme, so it looks as though this will run for a while yet

    East Street – Holes Lane general improvements
    John Boardman said that the first phase of the two-phase housing development off East Street was coming to a close which should release around £30k in Section 106 (planning gain) funding. Two years ago MKC had put forward three possible improvement schemes and John suggested now would be the time to revisit these. Colin Rodden asked if it could be considered as part of the overall Section 106 funding from the proposed new houses off Yardley Road, but Jeremy Rawlings said legally it had to be spent in the vicinity of the development. This generated some discussion around what improvements could be made. One suggestion was to continue the footpath around the bend close to the recreation ground but Peter Geary said it would result in the road becoming too narrow for two way traffic and it would have to become one-way. Steve Clark said a one-way system would result in an increase in traffic speed. The alternative might be two way with priority in one direction but that would probably involve the installation of traffic lights, he thought. Chris Tennant said such a scheme would not be appropriate to S106 and would need to be a major capital project which in turn would need to consider all traffic movement around the town. Peter Geary said that with the current financial situation at MKC it was unlikely that funding would be available. Jeremy Rawlings proposed that the matter should be progressed outside the meeting and Desmond Eley expressed the opinion that it was only a matter of time before there was a ‘serious incident’

    Community Speedwatch
    Thames Valley Police have identified a scheme whereby communities can sign up to take part in exercises where they can themselves actively be involved in monitoring traffic speed in their locality. Two communities that have taken part in a trial have seen positive feedback. The scheme works by residents volunteering to assist in the setting up of the Speedwatch equipment and logging vehicles that are exceeding the speed limit. Offenders are then written to, via TVP, advising them of their excessive speed and given guidance to avoid speeding in the future. Vehicle details are recorded on the TVP Speedwatch database. OTC has requested volunteers via Facebook and to date around six people have expressed an interest. If you would like to volunteer, please contact the council office for more information. 

    Land at corner of Lavendon Road and Warrington Road
    As previously reported, Angle Property have submitted plans for a retail foodstore and up to 26 residential units on this site and officers of MKC Planning Department were recommending acceptance of the scheme. Peter Geary reported that he and a number of other councillors had attended a meeting with the developer where the developer’s objective had been to persuade OTC to drop its objection to the scheme. OTC’s objective was to get the housing element of the scheme removed because the recently adopted Neighbourhood Plan (NP) had reserved the site solely for retail use. Chris Tennant said that at the meeting the developer confirmed that the foodstore would be occupied by Sainsbury’s and they considered the site to be in-fill and therefore not subject to the restrictions of the NP. Peter Geary said the change in the retail market meant that the size of new stores was reducing, but it was not in the interests of the town to see the whole scheme fall apart. No one had been able to demonstrate a sound reason why the NP should be changed or challenged, he said. Tony Evans was of the opinion that anything that OTC did which weakens the status of the NP would cause problems further down the line and the recommendations of the plan must be observed. Steve Clark thought the submitted plans would be bound to be rejected by the forthcoming MKC Development Control Committee (DCC) and his advice would be to resubmit without the housing. Peter Geary asked if OTC wished to reconsider its decision to object to the plans in the light of all the information they had before them. This was put to a vote and was unanimously rejected. Hew then asked if the housing element was removed would OTC support the application. This was unanimously agreed.  Note: After a short debate at the DCC on 12th April the developer withdrew the application for the housing element. They undertook to resubmit the plans with a stand-alone supermarket within the next two weeks

    MKC affordable housing
    MKC has published a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) which aims to make clear the council’s responsibilities in providing affordable housing, both as a housing landlord and as an enabler and regulator to assist others in meeting the housing needs of the community. One of the objectives is to provide more clarity on options for affordable housing delivery in the rural areas. Joanne Eley doubted whether affordable housing will be built in Olney and Peter  Geary said that Olney is not a popular location with housing associations due to the limited public transport links with nearby centres of employment. Jeremy Rawlings noted that the size of development requiring affordable housing has been reduced from 15 to 10. The consultation period runs from 19th March to 27th April and it was agreed that Joanne Eley will liaise with MKC on the matter.

    Olney Town Football Club
    The entire committee of Olney Town Football Club (OTFC) have announced that they will stand down at the end of the current season and unless sufficient volunteers come forward to replace them, the club will fold. Tony Evans said he would be sorry to see the demise of the club, but it is no longer a local club as all players and the manager come from outside the town. He noted that the separately run Olney Town Colts now had a seniors team and said he would like to see the club grow. Joanne Eley said that unlike other local sports teams the players receive a match fee and do not get involved in running the club. Steve Clark was disappointed that OTC had been mentioned in the club’s Facebook announcement, particularly when they had bent over backwards to help them with the barrier around the pitch, in the face of public opposition. The leagues need to recognise that many smaller clubs play on town/parish council owned recreation grounds and will not get permission for stands, turnstiles and the like, he said. Liam Costello said that a 99 year lease for the land on which the club house stands was signed in 1983 so it was important that the contract terms should be obeyed by OTC and OTFC during the winding-up process. The lease does not include automatic use of the pitches he said, which get renegotiated each year.

    unknown
    Olney Town Football Club

    Odds and sods
    The installation of power bollards on the Market Place has been completed, but to a generally poor standard. Some bollards are in exposed locations and are at risk of being damaged by vehicles. A meeting will take place with the contractors. Kevin Viney reported that most of the illegal structures on Goosey Island had finally been removed. The metal scaffold poles on the bridge had been removed but those on the island remained, as did the rubbish. MKC will be reminded that the owner has not yet been fully compliant with the enforcement order. It was noted that the recent wet weather had resulted in the Long Lane bridleway becoming impassable again. A large pot-hole has appeared at the entrance to the Co-op, probably caused by delivery and construction vehicles. Repairs are in hand and will be completed shortly. Deirdre Bethune was concerned that vehicles are continuing to park in front of dropped kerbs required for disabled access. She also noted that delivery vehicles to the newly opened Cherry Tree pub were blocking the footpath in Spring Lane during deliveries and causing problems to the users of mobility scooters. The old Natwest Bank building has been sold. The ‘Town Clock’ mounted on the wall of the building was provided by public donation for the Silver Jubilee in 1977 and is maintained by OTC. The new owner has agreed to continue with the existing wayleave arrangement.  The Annual Town Meeting will take place on Thursday 17th May at 7:00 pm at the Olney Centre.
    Next Meeting - 14th May The next OTC meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 14th May in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.

    unknown
    Potholes in Stanley Court

    ·    May 2018

    Olney Council report for 14th May 2018

    Olney in Bermuda
    Olney Bean and her husband Lee had travelled from Bermuda to see the town she was named after. Introducing herself and clearly joyful to be here, she explained that her mother had been given the middle name ‘Olney’ because she’d been delivered, in Bermuda, by a midwife from Olney UK. Wanting to continue the line, her mother then named her Olney, a favour she conferred on the next generation by giving it to one of her daughters as her middle name. She exchanged gifts with Jeremy Rawlings, she giving him various books and cards, and he reciprocating with the Olney Hymns book.

    unknown
    Olney Bean and her husband Lee had travelled from Bermuda to see the town she was named after


    Public Participation
    David Coles David Coles, the only person to speak in this section, explained that David Coles Architects has bought the old NatWest Bank building to become its business premises. He has applied for permission to build a single storey rear extension to contain a toilet, and to change the class of use from A2, financial and professional services, to B1, business. He plans to maintain a shop-front-like exterior, so people can look in to see what services the firm offers. The clock, which currently falls under a wayleave agreement between Olney Town Council (OTC) and NatWest, will now fall under a similar agreement between the Council and David Coles Architects.

    unknown
    The old NatWest building, purchased by David Coles Architects


    Elections
    Jeremy Rawlings was elected Mayor and Sally Pezaro appointed Deputy Mayor, both unopposed.

    Peter Evans
    Peter Evans, former caretaker of the Olney Centre, recently passed away. Jeremy Rawlings led all present in standing for a minute’s silence.

    Admin
    This being the first meeting of the new Council year, various administrative matters were discussed and taken care of. Deidre Bethune asked Councillors to consider whether, for confidential discussions in the Human Resources Committee, Councillors outside that Committee should be excluded, along with the press and public as now. Peter Geary felt this would be a misstep, noting that each Councillor has a responsibility and that taking away their right to attend any meeting they wish would be a dangerous step. After further discussion, Deidre withdrew the request. The Council voted to adopt the General power of Competence, a new power available to local authorities in England to do “anything that individuals generally may do”. Brought into force for local authorities in 2012, it was provided for in the Localism Act 2011 and replaces the well-being powers in the Local Government Act 2000.

    Bits’n’bobs
    The Human Resources Committee is considering outsourcing some of its work as the area it covers becomes more regulated and complex. The Council agreed to give the Rugby Club permission to use the Nursery Field as parking for Rugby 7’s day on Saturday 23rd June, subject to reasonable weather. It will also inform the Club of the requirements for proper marshalling and signage, along with the potential for a Park and Ride service to help alleviate the overall parking problem. The Council is considering upgrading its website and perhaps also its email system. The recent repair to the large pothole at the entrance to the Co-op car park, paid for by one of the smaller nearby businesses and acknowledged temporary, will be completed more permanently, funded by a group of the larger affected businesses including the Co-op and the Bull.

    Planning
    Chris Tenant reported that the mixed retail and residential application for the site to the North East of the Whirly Pit roundabout had been discussed at a Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Development Control meeting. He and Peter Geary had spoken on behalf of OTC to object, inviting the applicant to withdraw the residential aspect. Rather than risk the application being refused, the applicant took the highly unusual step of withdrawing the whole application. The applicant has since requested a meeting with representatives from OTC to explain what it proposes to do next, the expectation being that it will submit an application for retail only. Peter Geary suggested that Councillors listen to its proposal and restate OTC’s policy that, as the Neighbourhood Plan designates, the site is for retail only. Chris noted that Councillors should also encourage the applicant to engage with the Public, for example sending a newsletter to local residents then holding a public meeting to discuss the application. Finally, Colin Rodden noted that the Council must do all it can to avoid a part residential plan from being granted permission. It was “the elephant in the room”, he said. Peter agreed: If MKC rejected the new application, the applicant could appeal and, if at that point MKC was having difficulty meeting its five year land supply, the applicant’s chances of successful appeal and subsequent grant of retail and residential permission would be increased. OTC would need to remain vigilant.

    Cobbs Garden Surgery
    As noted in the Olney Neighbourhood Plan, the Surgery is around half the size it should be, with long term population and care projections suggesting that a larger site will certainly be required. The Plan identified the site adjacent to Austen Avenue alongside the Youth Club as being suitable. Chris Tenant reported that Councillors had met with representatives from Cobbs Garden Surgery, the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) in which it operates and those responsible for finance. The Surgery is keen to expand the range of services it offers as well as increasing the number of patients it serves, but is highly constrained physically. Doctors from the Surgery have visited the new site and are very impressed with its potential. Department of Health (DoH) funding for a new site may be available and it was felt that it’d be great to see this Neighbourhood Plan proposal become a reality. Peter Geary noted that a crucial element was what MKC, the new site’s owner, would be prepared to sell it for versus what the DoH would be prepared to pay. He explained that MKC has a duty to maximise revenue from such sales but that, given the associated benefits, that may not be its only consideration when setting the price.

    Market Place electrics
    As reported before, the installation of power bollards on the Market Place has been completed but to a generally poor standard. The contractor has submitted an interim bill, but the Council is not intending to pay it, partly because no interim payment was agreed and mainly because the Council is not yet satisfied that the work has been completed to a sufficiently high standard. Tony Evans concluded the discussion, noting that “not a penny should go out of OTC” until the work is properly completed.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Peter Geary gave an update on the situation of parking in Oakdown Crescent. He said that Sue Warren had made a complaint to the MKC Standards Committee, which investigates complaints that Councillors are in breach of their Code of Conduct. The first stage of handling such a complaint is an assessment by an independent person to decide whether it should be referred on for a formal investigation or dismissed. Sue’s complaint was dismissed. As reported before, Sue had said at previous meetings that she’d lodged a complaint against OTC with the Local Government Ombudsman. However, the Ombudsman doesn’t investigate complaints about Town and Parish Councils. It does investigate complaints against Borough Councils, but OTC is not aware of any such complaint against MKC. Colin Rodden raised the idea, discussed before, of converting the Crescent’s garage block area to parking. Peter agreed that, in general, more parking was needed. He described the issue with parking as being like a balloon – you squeeze it in one area and it pops out in another. Sue had also said that she intended to re-apply for a Residents Parking Scheme in December. Peter noted that MKC had been asked whether, should such an application happen, Weston Road residents would be consulted as before. The answer was that they would be. He stressed that, to obtain a solution, it would be necessary to work with the people affected. OTC has submitted an application for money from the Community Parking Fund, and does not plan to take any further action regarding Oakdown Crescent until a decision has been made on that. Thank you to Liam Costello for providing assistance with the background and content of what was an important but fast moving part of the meeting.

    Bobs’n’bits
    The hanging baskets on the High Street and nearby roads will have been erected by Olney Events and friends before this article is published. Deidre Bethune thanked the Council for organising the baskets’ sponsorship, and for watering them throughout the season. Colin Rodden reported that a section of fencing in Kitchener Close had been damaged in order to provide an unofficial route into the recreation fields. The fence is believed to be owned by a housing association, so it will need to replace it, perhaps with one of a more substantial design. Graham Harrison noted that the potholes on the driveway to the allotments were becoming deep. Tony Evans explained that the groundsmen have material to fill them but, due to high workload, it would not happen soon. Next Meeting - 4th June The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th June in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.

    ·    June 2018

    Olney Council report for 4th June 2018

    Public Participation
    Ashley Pankhurst Ashley Pankhurst was first to speak in this slot, concerning a project to fund and locate a 24/7 accessible defibrillator in the town centre. He suggested that a suitable position for the unit would be on the Market Place bus shelter or public toilet. He’d already secured funding from The Olney Group (TOG), Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) and the Newport Pagnell and Olney Lions, and asked if the Council would feel able to purchase the unit and claim back the VAT. Sue Warren Sue Warren spoke next, on the topic of parking in Oakdown Crescent. Referring to Peter Geary’s comments in last month’s meeting, she reminded him that it wasn’t her who’d made the complaint – it was the residents of Oakdown Crescent. She expected an apology for this error, she said. She felt the Councillors who attended the site meeting in the Crescent on 7th December 2017 to see the problem first hand had no respect for the elderly people who’d met them there. She also showed a picture of an ambulance in the Crescent which could not, due to parked cars, park outside the house it needed to attend. She finished by claiming the Council didn’t care about the electorate, even the elderly, but that she would do whatever it took to make Oakdown Crescent a nice place to live with space for visitors to park. Teresa Riley Teresa Riley spoke about a parking issue affecting certain houses in Silver End, asking the Council to support their residents’ application to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) to lease parking spaces in the Old Cattle Market car park, including one 24 hour disabled space. She noted that the residents of nos. 2, 4 and 8 currently park there but that it’s becoming harder due to the success of Olney, for example with the expanded evening dining provided by the various new pubs and restaurants attracting visitors from out of town. Stuart Dorrill Next up was Stuart Dorrill, founder of local health, fitness and wellbeing company Bodyforce, which would like to take on the lease for the recently vacated Olney Town Football Club building. Founded in 2010, Bodyforce has grown to a team of seven qualified professionals providing group and individual training, as well as local outreach programmes. Noting that Bodyforce had trained 150 people on the day of this meeting, Stuart outlined its philosophy to inspire and empower people to take control of their health, fitness and wellbeing while having fun with people they might not otherwise meet. Bodyforce already uses part of the building for fitness sessions, but would like to extend the facilities it offers by taking on the lease and thus being able to control the whole space. Noting that Bodyforce has a stable, proven business model with finance in place to ensure maintenance and development of the building, he said it’d engaged an architect for initial design ideas and aimed to have a more detailed, costed plan in the near future. Paul Collins Paul Collins asked Stuart to outline Bodyforce’s commercial relationship with the Football Club. Stuart explained that it hires a room in the Club and also pays Olney Town Council (OTC) to hold sessions outside on the Recreation Ground.

    Silver End parking
    This item was to discuss the issues Teresa Riley raised in her Public participation slot. She had contacted MKC about the issue in 2014, and it had responded positively, citing various costs including a £350 per space yearly rental, and some conditions including that each household must be responsible for insuring its space. The residents did not take up MKC on its offer but, with parking becoming more difficult, they’d like to pursue it now. Colin Rodden noted that, if OTC backed these spaces, it may come under pressure to do the same for further spaces in the area. Graham Harrison felt that, with the Old Cattle Market car park having no disabled spaces, it may be sensible to add one. Peter Geary, explaining that he had no problem with the disabled space and did not necessarily disagree with the rest of the request, noted that it was MKC not OTC which controlled that car park. He said that the Council could push for waiting restrictions there to help parking overall. There was further debate, which concluded with Councillors agreeing to ask MKC for a disabled space in the car park and to ask it to propose a solution for the affected residents’ parking.

    unknown
    Silver End Parking


    Riverfest parking
    Following high attendances at Riverfest 2017 and the notable lack of on-site public parking, TOG had asked if it could use the Nursery Field for this purpose. The Council agreed subject to reasonable weather.

    Finance Committee
    It recently being the start of a new Council year, committees have been electing their chairs. Jeremy Rawlings noted that the most recent Finance Committee meeting had seen proposals for Deidre Bethune and Paul Collins to be elected chair but, with so few people being present at the meeting, they didn’t feel able to elect a chair. Peter Geary noted that this was bizarre – it was the Committee’s first meeting of the year so it should elect its chair. Paul Collins noted his concern that, while the accounts had been approved, the auditors’ report was not tabled at the meeting in spite of being received before it took place. Liam Costello noted that the report had been received after the agenda had been sent. There did not appear to be an inference that anything hinged on the report not being tabled.

    Speeding on Aspreys
    Councillors reviewed the data collected by the Speed Indicator Device (SID) which had been placed at various locations along Aspreys over the preceding few weeks. There were many graphs and some difficulties interpreting the data, but the average speed at the faster locations looked to be around 34 MPH, with 85% of drivers at or below 39 MPH with a few peaks of above 50 MPH generally late at night. It being a 30 MPH limit, the Council saw this to be a significant problem and will pass the data to the relevant authorities. Regular mobile speed camera checks and enforcement seem likely.

    Olney Town Colts FC pitch request
    Olney Town Colts requested, and OTC acceded, that it formally take over the rental of the Nursery and Charity Field pitches, allowing it to bring back two teams which currently play on the sports fields at Emberton.

    unknown
    Olney Town Football Club building

    Plan:MK examination
    OTC has the opportunity to present further comments on Plan:MK. For tonight, discussions centred on whether Olney, currently designated a Key Settlement, should instead be designated a Selected Village. Des Ealey was concerned that some aspects of Plan:MK are unclear about how development will happen in Key Settlements and had thus been talking with MKC. The key relevant question from the weighty information pack is: “Is the role of Key Settlements sufficiently clear? Does the policy comply with paragraph 154 of the National Planning Policy Framework which requires that policies should provide a clear indication of how a decision maker should react to a development proposal?” There was much debate on this, with there being clear concern that, should Plan:MK be rejected, Olney would have much to worry about: By then, it would be more than two years since approval of its Neighbourhood Plan and thus, with that much time having passed, it would carry less weight. So, Olney had no interest in risking that rejection by pushing too hard for the designation change. But, there was also a feeling that it would be advantageous to at least ask the question. Councillors voted unanimously to submit that OTC supports change in designation from Key Settlement to Selected Village at the next appropriate moment, and to seek advice on its effects. It’s worth noting at this point that OTC is commendably free of party politics, issues instead being discussed on an apolitical basis. Perhaps uniquely in Mercury’s experience, the matter of political allegiance was raised during this topic: Colin Rodden, while noting that, with the Neighbourhood Plan vote being so close, the Council needed to listen to local people, stated that he was an independent and Peter Geary a Conservative. Peter responded to this by saying that the usual Conservative position is to back rural areas to the hilt, but that Councils couldn’t make up policies on the hoof.

    War Memorial
    Historic England had informed OTC that it would like to list the Olney War Memorial due to its special architectural and historic interest, with the aim of affording it additional protection. It asked the Council for its views. Councillors were concerned that listing would bring with it unnecessary bureaucracy, with Peter Geary noting that, for small Councils particularly, the additional cost could yield an effect opposite that intended. Feeling that OTC has, is and will continue to maintain the structure to a high standard, Councillors agreed to recommend against listing.

    Market Place electrics
    As reported before, the installation of power bollards on the Market Place has been completed but to a generally poor standard. Due to holidays and other unavailability, the situation has not progressed since last month. One significant problem appears to be that, while the manufacturer of the electrical outlets specifies that the holes in which they’re mounted must be connected to a drain or have drainage holes drilled into the subsoil, EON had not included either action in its subcontractor’s specification

    East Street footpath
    John Boardman asked for the issue of there being no footpath on East Street between the Nursery Field and Fountain Court car park to be added to the list of ongoing actions tracked at each Council meeting. Plans for this path were drawn up by MKC 10 years ago but not progressed. The Section 106 agreement for the nearby 14 home development off East Street makes a contribution of £35,000 towards its provision.

    unknown
    Market Place Power Bollards


    Planning
    As reported previously, the mixed retail and residential application for the site to the North East of the Whirly Pit roundabout was withdrawn by the applicant due to OTC and others objecting to it on the basis that the Neighbourhood Plan designates the site retail only. Angle Property has since requested a meeting with the Council to discuss what, given the new, smaller retail only application, will happen to the rest of the site. Councillors agreed to stick with the view that the site was for retail only. Steve Clark concluded the topic by noting that the original all-retail Sainsbury’s application included facilities to deal with the effects of flooding, an aspect missing from the current one.

    Swimming Steps
    Colin Rodden reported that a young girl had cut her foot on a submerged broken bottle at the Swimming Steps. There was some debate about how to stop such problems, perhaps through signage asking people to take their litter home or the provision of a glass and plastic recycling bin near the existing general waste bin. There was also clear frustration with a feeling that, against someone leaving a broken bottle in such a location, what good was either measure?
    Next Meeting - 2nd July The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd July in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.

    ·    July 2018

    Olney Council report for 2nd July 2018

    Public Participation
    Sue Warren Sue Warren spoke first, on the topic of parking in Oakdown Crescent. She said since the last meeting two ambulances had failed to be able to park to take residents to hospital and said if the same situation arose with her mother it would be all over the local press. She said that before the council discussed the £7k cost of a ground survey (a later agenda item) they should consider using some of the money which they would shortly be receiving from the Grace Park development on East Street. She thought £7k was nothing in the grand scheme of things, compared to expenditure she had observed from the previous months Olney Town Council (OTC) accounts, and noted that the members were sitting on newly purchased chairs. If the survey decreed that the planned work was not viable the only solution would be parking permits. She finished by asking the council to consider the elderly residents, and their relatives who save money by caring for them. Bethan Courtman Bethan Courtman briefly spoke next about the now vacant Olney Town FC club house. Following the statement last month from Stuart Dorrill, founder of local health, fitness and wellbeing company Bodyforce, she reiterated that the company would still like to take over the lease of the building and had sought initial costing from an architect for changes to the infrastructure. She issued an open invitation to the Bodyforce summer fundraising event on 18th August 9.30 to 13.00 on the recreation ground. Ian Stokes Ian Stokes from Olney Town Colts FC spoke next, on a similar subject. The council had agreed that the colts could rent the Nursery Field pitch from next season, but there were unresolved issues around the lights, fencing and clubhouse, he said. To date he had been unable to make much progress due the absence of any proof of ownership or asset values of these items. Before any progress could be made he needed to know if the fence would be remaining, he said. If the fence was removed, then the pitch would not be safe to play on due to the associated concrete path. Would the colts have access to the clubhouse and the floodlight power at the back of the building, he asked? The Football Club situation was a later agenda item in the confidential section of the meeting from which press and public were excluded. Julie Lane Last to speak was Julie Lane about the possibility of the council purchasing land either side of the Goosey Bridge which has been the subject of unauthorised construction and depositing of rubbish. Julie said she was excited about the prospect as it would be a wonderful asset to the town with it’s views of the Church and where historically wildlife has had a chance to live alongside us in relative peace. Goosey Island is especially important as it provides a complete sanctuary for wildlife free from disturbance by people and dogs etc, presently being home to otters, goosanders, kingfishers and many more species. She said purchase of the land and subsequent good management would safeguard the wonderful views and landscape, secure a future for the wildlife and provide an opportunity for residents to get out into the countryside, thus improving mental and physical wellbeing.  This was another item that was later discussed under confidential matters.

    unknown
    Olney Town Football Club


    War Memorial
    As reported last month Historic England had informed OTC that it would like to list the Olney War Memorial due to its special architectural and historic interest, with the aim of affording it additional protection. The council have now received the initial assessment report, which is a factual report which Historic England will use as the basis for its recommendation to the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport. The view around the table was that OTC are quite capable of maintaining the structure to a high standard and do not want it listed.

    unknown
    Olney War Memorial


    Swimming Steps
    Colin Rodden reported that a young girl had cut her foot on a submerged broken bottle at the Swimming Steps. There was some debate about how to stop such problems, perhaps through signage asking people to take their litter home or the provision of a glass and plastic recycling bin near the existing general waste bin. There was also clear frustration with a feeling that, against someone leaving a broken bottle in such a location, what good was either measure?

    Oakdown Crescent parking
    Milton Keynes Council (MKC) has informed OTC that in order to provide a detailed design and quotation for any proposed works it would need to undertake some surveys of the existing ground conditions. This would involve some slip trenches and coring and the maximum cost would be £7k. This would identify what services existed and where, as well as the depths of pavement layers which would be required if the area is to be turned into parking. The cost would form part of the Community Parking Scheme and OTC would only have to pay 50%. Desmond Eley was of the opinion that this was ‘putting the cart before the horse’ since OTC and MKC’s preferred scheme had already been rejected by the residents. Paul Collins agreed, saying without a scheme that is supported by residents there was no point in carrying out a survey. Steve Clark suggested that the council go back to MKC to confirm what their financial obligation would be and ask if they had confidence to carry out a survey without an agreed scheme. MKC should have received the original plans for the development when Newport Pagnell RDC was disbanded, he said, making a survey unnecessary. Chris Tenant suggested that the survey might be required in order to decide what is possible. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings proposed that OTC do not proceed with the survey ‘at the present time’ and seek further information from MKC, which was passed by a majority vote.

    Deputy Mayor’s chain of office
    As well as the Mayors chain of office, to be worn at official functions, a second chain exists and there has been some confusion recently as to whether it is intended for the Mayor’s consort when accompanying the Mayor, or the Deputy when representing him/her. Dierdre Bethune clarified the matter, saying it was intended to serve as both. When representing the mayor at short notice it is not always possible for the deputy to obtain the chain as it is locked in the safe at the council offices. It was not considered an urgent or particularly important issue, but Steve Clark wondered if a local person or business might like to sponsor another chain.

    MK East Local Stakeholder Group
    The Milton Keynes East Strategic Urban Extension (MKE SUE) will see largescale development to the East of the M1 as part of Plan:MK and MKC is currently pursuing funding from Government to enable development on the site to begin before 2031. MKC is engaging with the community by creating a Local Stakeholder Group (LSG) made up of representatives from parish and town councils. It was agreed that OTC will provide reps into this form to reflect any issues and concerns raised by residents. This initiated a discussion about the impacts on Olney of MKE SUE and one of the inevitable impacts will be an increase in traffic. Kevin Viney said that improved pollution monitoring would be essential as the existing equipment is obsolete and only just held together ‘by wax and string’. Chris Tennant stated that the development would take the A509 beyond critical capacity so some of the funding should be used for an Olney bypass. Desmond Eley noted that the currently favoured route had been decided many years ago and wondered if the electorate should be asked to decide if it was still appropriate.

    OTC Website
    Jeremy Rawlings reported that the current website is ‘looking a bit jaded’ and does not meet current Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0), having had no money spent on it for several years apart from content updates. The provider had little interest in upgrading or supporting it, consequently it is getting very difficult to maintain. The council have approached local company Nuwave Design who have put together a proposal and they will be invited to present them in more detail prior to a decision being made.

    unknown
    A jaded website


    Market Place electrics
    As reported before, the installation of power bollards on the Market Place has been completed but to a generally poor standard and the drainage does not meet requirements. There has been no progress since last month, so Colin Rodden said it was now essential to impose dates and deadlines. Desmond Eley pointed out that the new bollards cannot be used until certified and tested. Deidre Bethune said it was important that the matter is resolved before the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) on the weekend of 8th and 9th September.

    Odds and Sods
    MKC has agreed to pay for repairs to the Speed Indicating Device (SID). Colin Rodden said the footpath between Olney and Weston Underwood is getting narrow and overgrown. He asked if any reply had been received to OTC’s letter about the poor state of the boarding at Bennett’s butchers. Town Clerk Liam Costello confirmed that there hadn’t. Kevin Viney expressed his concern about traffic on the bend in Yardley Road at the site of the old railway bridge as it is a blind corner and an accident waiting to happen in his opinion. The new housing close to the bend will exacerbate the situation, he thought. Steve Clark reported that the English Regional Transport Association who are committed to reopening the Bedford to Northampton railway line recently held a meeting in The Bull. The currently proposed route was designed in 2001 and notes that the office park to the north of the town ‘may have to be demolished’ in order to facilitate this! Next Meeting - No August meeting - 3rd September There will be no August meeting, so the next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.

    Stop Press - There will be a meeting in August
    In an unusual move Olney Town Council have decided to hold a full meeting in August, as there some matters to resolve

    ·    August 2018

    Olney Council report for August 2018

    Public Participation
    Mike Totton First to speak was Mike Totton on behalf of the Allotment Holders’ Association. Mike explained that the current system of allocating each plot a number was confusing and unpopular and the association would like to give each row a street name and display a map at the entrance. A list would be drawn up and agreed with OTC to ensure that it did not contain anything that could cause offence. It was noted that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) policy prohibited roads being named after a living person, but Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that this only applied to public thoroughfares. Normally the council would not make decisions on matters raised during the public participation part of the meeting but in this case made an exception and agreed to support the proposal. Howard Tanner Next to speak was Howard Tanner. He and Ashley Pankhurst had previously attended the Recreations and Services Committee meeting to discuss their proposal to provide two Public Access Defibrillators (PADs) in Olney with funds raised locally. It was agreed in principle at that meeting, but the actual locations would need to be decided by the full council and was therefore an item on the formal agenda. Howard was concerned that the existing PAD in the Olney Centre was only available during opening hours and suggested that it should be relocated to an outside cabinet to give 24-hour access. This could be done at a cost of approximately £300 which he suggested could be raised with the support of local businesses. 

    Public Access Defibrillators
    Following on from Howard Tanner’s presentation the location for the PADS was discussed. Mike had been in discussion with the General Manager of St John Ambulance about placing a unit there, who was supportive but said it would have to go through the central organisation Estates and Facilities to decide. Dierdre Bethune reminded members that the local St John was no longer active and the unit might need to be relocated if the building was sold. It was agreed to look at a different location and eventually it was decided to investigate the possibility of using one of the bus shelters along Aspreys. A suggested location for the second unit was the now redundant BT phone box on the Market Place. BT has offered to sell it to OTC for £1 but Peter Geary was concerned that the sale would be delayed by bureaucracy. It was decided to locate the second unit in the Market Place bus shelter and to progress with locating the existing unit at the Olney Centre to an outside wall.

    OTC Website
    As reported last month the current OTC website is difficult to maintain and does not meet current Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0), having had no money spent on it for several years apart from content updates. The council has approached local company Nuwave Design who has put together a proposal and Matt McAuliffe was present to discuss his proposal. Matt explained that he provides website design and support for several international, national and local companies as well as developing the OlneyApp to help local businesses get online. He explained how he could work with OTC to create a site that would be WCAG compliant so that it would be accessible to visually impaired residents. Text and background colours need to be chosen carefully to enable viewing by people with colour-blindness and links and pictures need to have full descriptions behind them so that they can be converted to meaningful audio by content readers. Paul Collins said he thought that the guidelines were only advisory, not mandatory, but Sally Pezaro believed OTC should want to be compliant. Matt said his interpretation was that any site published before 23rd September this year would need to be compliant within two years. A vote was taken as to whether to stay with the existing supplier or employ Nuwave to develop a new site. Nuwave was agreed by a majority.

    Neighbourhood Plan (NP) – the next stage
    The full council meeting closed at this stage and the members of the Neighbourhood Plan Development Committee remained for their inaugural meeting. The first task was to elect a chairman and Chris Tennant was elected unopposed. The Terms of Reference for the committee were reviewed and it was decided to name it the Olney Development Group. The group can comprise a number of OTC councillors and up to five external or ‘lay’ members, but Mayor Jeremy Rawlings thought that it was unlikely five volunteers would come forward. Tony Evans pointed out that if the group contained non-elected members then it could not ‘spend’ any of the Section 106 (planning gain) money, only recommend projects for funding to the full council. Concern was also expressed that external members would not be able to vote and would not be accountable to anyone but themselves. After some discussion it was agreed to create a ‘person spec’ of areas of expertise required to take the plan forward. The group will look at three or four projects at a time and engage the appropriately skilled resource as and when required. In the 12 months since the Olney NP was written and adopted by a local referendum the government has revised the National Planning Policy Framework and MKC has issued Plan:MK for public consultation. Chris Tennant was of the opinion that nothing in either would require a revision of the NP but said the group should be mindful of any changes that might. Major changes would require another referendum. He proposed that an update be issued to the public explaining the progress of the plan and the status of each proposed development. For information, Site D/E ‘Land West of Yardley Road and West of Aspreys Outline permission (with all matters reserved except access) for the residential development of 250 dwelling houses and associated public open space, car parking and community facilities including a multi-use community building’ was approved by MKC on 31/07/2018. The council successfully objected to the inclusion of housing on Site R ‘Land at Corner of Lavendon Road and Warrington Road’ as it contravened the NP which states that site should be used for retail only. Jeremy Rawlings said he hoped that this latter decision will have persuaded some of those that were against adoption of the plan that it has proved its worth.

    Premises License application – Sainbury’s
    Sainsbury’s have submitted an application to sell alcohol Monday to Sunday 06:00 to 24:00 and provide Late Night Refreshments Monday to Sunday 23:00 to 24:00. The council had no comment to make on the application.

    Next Meeting 3rd September The next full council meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for 3rd September 2018

    Public Participation
    Sandra Hearn First to speak was Sandra Hearn. As one of the owners of The Nest at No. 9, next door to the recently ram-raided Barclays bank in the High Street, she noted the effect that the works to make safe and clean up the bank were having on her business. The Nest had seen an immediate reduction in takings following the Barclays raid, meaning that neither owner could any longer take a wage from the shop. She was concerned that, if the works took as long as allowed, the end of September, the shop would have to close. On one day, their takings amounted to £30, less even than in the midst of this year’s winter snow. It’s worth noting that, at the time of this meeting, the works’ fencing entirely blocked the walkway, and stretched across the full width of The Nest, only a few metres in front of it. The walkway has since been reopened and the fencing reduced, although, as you’d expect, the hoardings in front of the bank aren’t pleasant to the eye or thus conducive to good business. Subsequent works will be required for the bank to reopen. This topic was discussed later in the meeting. Sue Warren Sue Warren was next to speak, on the topic of parking in Oakdown Crescent. She pointed out what she felt to be an anomaly, that the Mayor appeared to believe that the residents of the Crescent had not agreed any plan to improve the parking situation, and noting that in fact they had agreed Option B, parking in a single block in the middle of the Crescent, back in June 2016. She backed this up by providing a handout, to every Councillor, of meeting minutes relevant to the Crescent over the last three years. This topic was also discussed later in the meeting. Jariath McElroy Jarlath McElroy, from Olney Rugby Club, spoke last. He explained that the Club’s facilities are limited and somewhat dated, requiring additions and improvements for ladies and younger players. The Club is looking to expand its facilities and, thus, would like to take over the lease on the Football Club building. If this was successful, the Club not being the only contender, it would still want to see football played on the Recreation Ground pitch, so would come to an arrangement with the Olney Town Colts Football Club and also with Caveman Conditioning so its range of sports could continue. He noted that if, for example, the Council still had money owed to it from the previous occupants, the Rugby Club would see what it could do to help. Finally, he noted that the alternative was to expand its existing facilities onto Doff’s Field.

    Oakdown Crescent
    Olney Town Council (OTC) had been in correspondence with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) about a possible parking scheme in Oakdown Crescent, and this had progressed to the point where MKC wanted to perform a ground survey prior to costing and implementing the scheme. If agreed, OTC would need to pay £3,500, half the survey’s cost, MKC match-funding the remainder. This scheme would provide 11 marked spaces in the Crescent. This started a lengthy discussion. Joanne Eley noted that the proposed scheme had two fewer spaces than one discussed before. Peter Geary noted that a ballpark cost for the scheme itself might be £20-30,000, and that deciding whether to perform the ground survey needed to be seen in the context of the overall cost. Joanne felt that bays for carers and the disabled should be provided, Peter noting that that carer bays were not enforceable and that, although disabled bays were, they wouldn’t meet the real need. Chris Tenant proposed working with MKC to get a design which regained the two lost spaces, a mutually agreeable solution, then performing the survey as the first step towards starting work. This proposal was not carried – five Councillors voting in favour, six against and two abstaining. Chris then suggested that a scheme be devised where the bays could simply be painted on the ground. Peter questioned whether, while this would be cheap, it would help. Malcolm Messenger, back as a Councillor following a short break in the Channel Islands, suggested that an ambulance bay would be useful and, in general, such bays were respected. The Council will contact MKC to discuss marking out one or more bays for ambulances and carers only.

    Barclays bank robbery
    Councillors acknowledged the problems being experienced by the Nest at No. 9 due to the works resulting from damage caused by the recent Barclays ram-raid. Peter Geary noted that the current works, which involved clearing asbestos from the bank (hazardous work requiring specified minimum clearances, etc.), had been given permission to continue until 24th September. When the rebuilding then started, he felt the subsequent permission must require the pavement to be kept open, even if adjacent parking bays could be closed. Des Eley noted that, while the September date was that until the current works had been given permission to continue, asbestos removal could often prove more complicated and time consuming than initially predicted. In reality, bar advising Sandra Hearn to apply for the various types of compensation available, the Council did not appear to be able to do much to remedy the immediate situation. The Council, doubtless along with residents, is very keen for Barclays to reopen, and will write a letter to the bank expressing support for its reopening and offering to assist, for example by expediting the planning process.

    unknown
    Barclays Bank Robbed


    Electric vehicle parking space
    The Council voted to support a proposal to have an electric vehicle space and charging point in the small parking area where Midland Road meets the A509. Access to the bay will be restricted to electric vehicles currently being charged.

    Cherry Fair
    The next Cherry Fair will be held on the Glebe on 15th June 2019.

    Tennis court track resurfacing
    The Recreations and Services Committee had recommended to full Council that the track between the tennis courts and the toilet and workshop block be resurfaced to improve drainage. There were questions as to whether it was worth spending around £16,000 on this work, but Tony Evans noted a related issue – that the new tennis courts’ surface would deteriorate faster if players tramped in mud from the nearby track. This was, in part, why the Multi Use Games Area’s surface degraded, he said. The Council voted on whether this work should be done, subject to Section 106 funding, and the vote was carried by majority, six to five, with two abstentions.

    Speeding on Driftway
    Following further measurement of vehicle speed on Driftway, it’s clear that speeding is commonplace, with around 90% exceeding the 30MPH limit. Kevin Viney raised an interesting point: Given that no houses front on to the road, should it in fact be a 40MPH limit? Peter Geary suggested initiating an open dialogue with MKC Highways Department to discuss road design, speed, etc. Malcolm Messenger asked if data was available on road traffic collisions on that road. A dialogue will be opened with MKC.

    Milton Keynes expansion
    Des Eley had attended a meeting of the Milton Keynes East Strategic Urban Extension Stakeholder Group. The East Strategic Urban Extension area is that immediately to the North East of the M1, South of Newport Pagnell and roughly bisected by the A509 section North of M1 Junction 14 (see map). MKC wants to promote Milton Keynes expansion and has government quotas to work to, but is having trouble funding the required infrastructure, Section 106 monies proving insufficient. This is one reason why development is proceeding more slowly than desired. MKC has now applied for £75 million of government funding from the Housing Infrastructure Fund towards the Eastern expansion. This Fund contains £2.3bn to help deliver new homes in England by funding delivery of infrastructure ahead of development – a worthy attempt to address a common ongoing problem. The Eastern expansion, which could comprise up to 8,000 homes, had been timed for after 2031 but, to attract this funding, the monies would have to be spent by 2022. This being considerably sooner, brainstorming sessions were being run to work out how to achieve it. Des noted that this money included funding for an additional M1 crossing, though not an Olney bypass. The final decision on funding will be made early to mid 2019. Peter Geary noted that a Planning Inspector had concluded a public examination of Plan:MK over the Summer and, subject to minor changes, passed it for MKC to adopt. The Eastern site is included in Plan:MK but only as a reserve site. So, the plan effectively gives the green light for this area being developed. But, he felt it would be a huge mistake to push ahead with the funding and earlier build. It was ‘scandalous’ that ‘back of a fag packet estimates’ had been made in order to apply for the funding. They would not pass the normal spending criteria, he said. A major concern was that if MKC had underestimated the funding required, it would either have to pick up the tab or live with the resulting terrible infrastructure. Steve Clark noted that the body language of those in the meeting suggested they felt the works could not be accomplished in the required time.
     

    unknown
    Strategic Urban Extension: Milton Keynes East


    Trees and hedges
    Colin Rodden noted that various residents’ hedges were protruding onto pavements making it hard for pedestrians, particularly the elderly or disabled, to get around. Householders are responsible for trees and hedges which overhang from their property, while MKC is responsible for ensuring that footpaths are kept clear for pedestrians to use. Next Meeting - 1st October The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 1st October in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for 1st October 2018

    Public Participation
    PCSO Terry Rhodes First to speak was Police Community Support Officer (PCSO) Terry Rhodes. Terry introduced himself to Olney Town Council (OTC) and members of the public present, explaining that he had been in post as the dedicated officer for Olney for approximately six weeks, having taken over from Tina Lewington who had held the post for the previous 10 years. He said he had been actively working with the local Speedwatch team and had approached Milton Keynes Council (MKC) about repainting of some double yellow lines in the town. Terry said that his shift pattern was a mixture of days and late shifts but would endeavour to be present in town during specific events, especially if organisers could inform him of such events. Richard Hillier Next to speak was Richard Hillier. Richard explained that as the user of a mobility scooter he was getting increasingly frustrated by the poor parking in the town, particularly in front of dropped kerbs, which meant that he often has to take a considerable detour just to cross the street. The kerb outside the old Nat West is one such area, he said. He often finds parked cars there preventing him crossing and when he then attempts to cross outside McColl’s there are cars parked there as well. PCSO Kirsty Martinson said she was aware of the situation but felt that the hatching on the road was not sufficiently clear in some places. She said she frequently receives abuse from drivers when cautioning them for bad parking, claiming that they are ‘only slipping into a shop for a minute’. Terry Rhodes said in certain circumstances PCSOs can issue a £30 parking ticket for obstruction.

    unknown
    Dropped Kerb outside the old Nat West Bank


    MKC Community Infrastructure Fund
    This item was brought forward on the agenda as it was thought that it might assist with some of the parking issues discussed in the public participation section. Steve Clark explained that the fund was part of a scheme to replace three previous Parish Grants. Bids need to be in place by the end of October, but these can be in the form of a Statement of Interest, rather than a fully worked up application. The fund enables a variety of different Public Realm schemes that have a positive impact upon a community to be implemented that would otherwise not meet funding criteria for council funded schemes. These can include highways, transport, environment, landscaping, play area or outdoor leisure schemes. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said the scheme would partly replace the Parish Parking Fund, so could be used to address some of the town’s parking problems. He thought that the situation outside the old Nat West could be improved if the kerb was ‘squared off’ making it more difficult for cars to just nip in to park. Colin Rodden suggested that area on the market place in front of the BT Broadband cabinet could be used for motorbike parking. It was agreed to apply for a grant from the fund to improve the dropped kerbs in the Market Place. 

    Litter on Lavendon Road
    A letter had been received from Robert Marchant saying that he and Mike Price had recently spent a Sunday afternoon picking up litter along the highway between the Wellingborough Road roundabout and Uncle Jack’s corner. Robert said he understood that there are many calls upon budgets but asked if it was possible for proper formal endeavours to be made by those responsible to keep the town and its approaches looking nice, particularly as the town is now receiving more visitors due to the opening of new establishments. He wondered if it might be possible for retailers, businesses and residents to contribute to a general fund to keep the place looking smart. Peter Geary said that litter picking along a highway is the responsibility of MKC, which used to provide a regular service, but each road was now only done once a year. It might be appropriate to ask MKC’s contractors Serco to quote for additional litter picks, he thought. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings said that because it was a dangerous and fast road with no footpath it would not be appropriate for voluntary groups to be asked to do it. If Serco were asked to quote then it should include the other approaches to the town from the parish boundary, he thought.

    Overhanging trees in High Street
    Jeremy Rawlings explained that when the new LED street lighting was installed in the High Street, MKC carried out a survey of the trees and the requirement to trim, as appropriate. This was not only because they were already overgrown, but because the horizontal stems of the new lampposts were shorter than the originals, thereby exacerbating an existing problem. No trimming had taken place and the problem had got worse. Declaring an interest as a resident of the High Street, Deirdre Bethune said that an upper story room in her house was in almost perpetual darkness, due to the problem. Peter Geary said that the required work would take 60% of the total MKC tree budget. Most of this budget is held in reserve for storm damage he said, and even if the trees could be crowned by the required 30% they would need doing again in five to six years’ time. OTC will write to MKC requesting that the work is carried out.

    MK East – Sustainable Urban Extension
    For a detailed description of this project see last month’s Mercury report. Newport Pagnell Town Council has commented on the proposals with particular reference to the impact of queuing traffic and impact on its shops. Peter Geary said that in order to avoid a massive increase in traffic over the existing and proposed M1 crossings to get to Kingston a new eastern District Centre would need to be built and this could have a detrimental impact on the shops in Newport Pagnell. Although government funding has been sought for an additional M1 crossing, no provision has been made for an Olney bypass, the cost of which would be around £100m. Steve Clark said a series of workshops are being held, which OTC members should be encouraged to attend.

    Civil Ceremonies at the Olney Centre
    The licence to hold civil ceremonies at the Olney Centre expires in March 2019 and will cost £2.5k to renew for a further three years. This is an increase of £1k from when it was last renewed in 2016 and whilst it was agreed that this service brings in hire revenue for the centre, some questioned the justification for such a large increase in the fee. The council will write to MKC requesting a breakdown of the fee, since it is supposed to just cover costs to MKC and not make a profit.

    unknown
    Civil Ceremonies at the Olney Centre


    Odds and Sods
    The new electrical installation in the market place has been completed by EON. Colin Rodden said he thought it had been done to a very shoddy standard and OTC should be looking for a discount. It was also agreed that new Risk Assessments need to be carried out based on market stall holders’ routing of cables from the new pillars. Colin Rodden reported that the Johnsons Field play equipment is in a bad state of repair, with the zip wire and basketball hoops both broken and the ramp defaced by graffiti. It was time to revive the proposed skate park, he said. Deirdre Bethune noted that when MKC had disposed of 102 Weston Road it had held back part of the garden to provide parking for residents who were currently parking in Oakdown Crescent. What was the current situation, she asked? Steve Clark said there was also a gravel area behind the houses on Weston Road that had come about by taking some land from the existing houses. This area was sufficient to park 11 cars, but a recent check indicated that it wasn’t being used he said. Peter Geary reminded members that if any of this land was turned into formal car parking then MKC would require OTC to provide 50% of the funding. Colin Rodden reported that the spotlights on the zebra crossing by One Stop have been removed making it difficult for approaching cars to see pedestrian after dark. Deirdre Bethune noted that the overgrown trees were adding to the problem.

    Confidential matters
    Very often the final item on the agenda is ‘to consider exclusion of Public and Press Representatives pursuant to the Public Bodies (admission to meetings) Act 1960 on the basis that publicity would be prejudicial to the public interest by the confidential nature of the business to be transacted’. A vote is taken as to whether members of the press and public should be asked to leave (they always are) and the rest of the meeting takes place behind closed doors, details of which are not recorded in the minutes made available to the public. In this case the matter being discussed was the ongoing issue of the now dissolved Olney Town Football Club and its assets.  Next Meeting - 5th November The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th November in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for 5th November 2018

    Public Participation
    Chiv Parslow Chiv Parslow spoke first in this slot. He’s a coach driver whose work includes taking children to and from local schools. He asked whether the bus stop adjacent to Olney Middle School could be marked, as are all the other stops he uses. He felt the lack of marking to be a safety issue – parked cars meant he sometimes had to drive around the block in anticipation of a space becoming free, or stop on the brow of the hill. He noted that the School head teacher had asked if he could raise this issue. Gill Simmons Gill Simmons spoke next. As part of the local Community Speedwatch group, she noted the excessive speeds, up to 80mph, recorded by the Speed Indicator Devices (SIDs) on Aspreys. She felt signage was required to reinforce the 30MPH limit, drivers perhaps not appreciating that pedestrians need to cross that road. This topic was discussed later in the meeting. Elaine Herniman Elaine Herniman spoke last, on the subject of creating a communal area within the allotments. She explained that this could be used for a mix of purposes including helping local schools, ‘Men in Sheds’ (usually an Age UK initiative), workshops, talks on wildlife and the countryside, and to help people with mental health issues. She asked if Olney Town Council (OTC) would like to support a planning application to remove two old sheds and replace them with a modular cabin building on a permanent concrete base, ideally with electrical and water connections. Again, this topic was discussed later in the meeting.
    Visit Olney partnership proposal

    Founded by Sophia Sanger, the Visit Olney website, https://www.visitolney.com, launched around ten years ago and is to become a Community Interest Company (CIC) with local directors. It’s requested a formal partnership with OTC, as its ambition is to make Visit Olney a tourism site, promoting Olney as a destination town. It’s not requesting funding as it’s created a business model based on monies from subscriber and partner listings. Colin Rodden felt the site was a great idea and one the Council should support. Deirdre had a slight concern that the Council should not be seen to endorse one local website over others. Jeremy Rawlings concluded the item, saying that the site was a good thing and looking forward to future interactions with Visit Olney.

    Allotments cabin
    Following on from Elaine’s introduction, this project is essentially the removal of two old sheds, which are in a poor state, and their replacement with a modular cabin atop a permanent concrete base of essentially the same footprint, all supplied by Dunster House. The cost of the cabin would be in the region of £10,000 excluding electricity and water connection costs. After some discussion, the Council agreed to submit and support the planning application when received, the former since it pays only half price on planning applications.

    Community Speedwatch speed awareness signage
    Continuing from Gill’s public participation slot, Colin Rodden explained that SID data for Aspreys and Driftway showed more than 75% of vehicles travelling above the 30MPH limit. Daytime recorded speeds, all MPH, have been up to 50 on the High Street, 46 on Yardley Road, 62 on Aspreys and 48 on Driftway. During the discussion which followed, all Councillors who spoke appeared to appreciate there was a problem, differing only on how to solve it. Peter Geary felt that road markings and coloured tarmac could help but, really, the solution was to speak with MKC’s road safety team to see what it recommended. Deirdre, while supporting the need to reduce speeds, noted that adding signage risked creating a surfeit of signs. Steve Clark felt that Thames Valley Police catching and fining speeding motorists would quickly result in speed reduction. Sally Pezaro was keen to learn what measures were proven to work. Gill Simmons explained that studies show it’s a mix of measures – for example speed cushions, additional signs and road narrowing – that slow people down. Peter Geary concluded the item, suggesting OTC request then consider a proposal from Speedwatch.

    Commemorative benches
    On 2nd October, Steve Clark made a post to the Olney Noticeboard. It contained a picture of a bench in Suffolk, believed to be https://www.davidogilvie.com/ww1-seat, designed to commemorate the centenary of the First World War. This post garnered support to site a similar bench in Olney, perhaps near the War Memorial on the Market Place. In addition, there appeared to be a will for this to be part funded by the public. A brief discussion covered the basics: The bench is comfortable to sit on and solidly constructed so felt unlikely to be damaged. Councillors felt two such benches should be purchased, likely sited replacing the existing wooden ones. Councillors agreed to fund the benches, with the Public also being given the opportunity to contribute toward their cost. Contributions are most welcome and may be made through the Council: Please call 01234 711679 or email townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.

    Inspection of East Street
    John Boardman and Peter Geary had walked the length of East Street to view the condition of the roadway and paths and discuss some specific issues, the main one pedestrian safety on the ‘S’ bend to the rear of The Two Brewers. Regarding that issue, there’s no pavement on this section and, to address it, Peter felt OTC would need to take the lead and engage with Milton Keynes Council (MKC). He noted that creating a pavement there would narrow the roadway, implying one-way traffic, perhaps alternated by traffic lights, for at least that section of the roadway. Chris Tenant explained that Section 106 monies from a nearby residential development were allocated for East Street improvements, Peter noting that the improvements would happen.

    Olney to Weston Underwood hedges
    Weston Underwood Parish Council had contacted OTC to ask if it would consider a joint agreement to cut the hedges bi-annually on the road between Olney and Weston Underwood. Tony Evans noted that much of the hedge line is privately owned, that between Weston and the Parish boundary (the hump back bridge) having been cut by its landowner during summer. He also explained that the section uphill towards Olney needed to be cut first by hand, and that the path itself was the responsibility of MKC Highways Department. Deirdre Bethune requested that, if the ‘wonderful tunnel’ there is cut back, it be done sensibly. Peter noted that perhaps the tunnel could be widened, thus allowing future cutting by machine. Regular machine cutting was thought to be only in the region of £200 for a bi-annual cut. A group of Councillors, including Tony, will walk the path then report to the Recreations and Services Committee.

    Milton Keynes Eastern expansion
    As reported previously, Milton Keynes is looking to expand into the East Strategic Urban Extension area, that immediately to the North East of the M1, South of Newport Pagnell and roughly bisected by the A509 section North of M1 Junction 14. Des Ealey and Peter Geary remain concerned, feeling the process is being rushed to meet Government funding deadlines. Des noted that the Cambridge – Oxford arc is now being called the Cambridge – Milton Keynes – Oxford arc, reflecting the key part Milton Keynes is expected to play in it. Peter noted that, while MKC appears to want the Eastern expansion, it had no policy saying it should build in excess of 200,000 houses. He felt its actions had instead grown from various informal meetings. Chris Tenant said he got the sense that Officers were running MKC rather than Councillors. Peter agreed, stating the expansion was their agenda and that, “if was in charge, some of them wouldn’t be there.” Although this expansion might seem mundane and far in the future at this point, it really is neither. If you’d like to find out more, http://bit.ly/2T5odWD, contains a link to the National Infrastructure Commission’s final report on the arc and one to the Government’s response to it.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    The snagging process with the Market Place electrical outlet installation continues. The location of the Oakdown Crescent emergency vehicle parking bay has been agreed and OTC will submit an application for it to be implemented. The tarmac surfacing of the roadway adjacent to the tennis courts has attracted an additional £4,000 cost due to the Anglian Water sewer below, expected to be 2.5m below ground, actually being only 0.9m down, thus requiring a concrete cap along the roadway’s full length. Colin Rodden noted some broken play equipment: The zip wire on the Recreation Ground, one football net on the MUGA, and the zip wire and bucket swing on Johnsons Field. Apparently the first of those will be repaired, but it raised an interesting more general issue. Peter Geary explained that MKC’s responsibility is to inspect and make safe existing adopted play areas, the point being that making them safe may involve decommissioning broken equipment rather than fixing it. The topic of defibrillators was touched on in passing, which seemed like a good excuse to print the locations of the Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) in Olney. AEDs are currently sited at the Market Place on the Toilet Block and on the Recreation Ground by the Council workshop. By the time of publication, there should also be one just off the High Street on the wall of the Olney Centre a few metres right of the main doors. Next Meeting - 3rd December The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd December in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for 3rd December 2018

    Public Participation
    Martin Allen was first to speak, with a request that Olney Town Council (OTC) spend some of the Section 106 monies from the development adjacent to the East Street car park on resurfacing the area on the recreation ground between the children’s play park and the MUGA (Multi Use Games Area). Jeremy Rawlings passed this request to the Recreations and Services Committee for consideration.

    Apologies for absence
    Steve Clark was unwell so could not attend this meeting.

    Declarations of interest
    This is the part of the meeting in which individual Councillors can declare their interest in various topics on the agenda. Normally pretty dry, the Mercury report tends to skip this bit. However, this time it was more interesting. After all interests had been declared, Jeremy Rawlings stated he’d been advised that Des Eley should declare an interest in an agenda item to ‘approve costs of mediation process’, Joanne Eley already having done so, while she should declare an interest in an item to ‘consider recommendation from HR Committee regarding Job Evaluations’. Both these items, while on the publicly available agenda, fell in the part of the meeting where public and press were excluded. Des and Joanne chose not to declare these interests. Jeremy concluded the discussion noting that this was what he’d been advised but the decision was up to them.

    Car parking and dropped kerbs
    Local resident Debbie Whitworth had passed a 230 signature petition to the Council, asking it to take a long hard look at the appalling car parking situation in the town. In a note to the Council, she took particular issue with poor parking around the Market Place and, as a wheelchair user, felt acutely the effects of selfish and inconsiderate parking. She cited an example where carers were attempting to push two elderly patients in wheelchairs across the road near McColls but, with a car parked blocking access to the dropped kerb, had to lift the chairs down a high kerb risking tipping the patients out. Asking where the traffic wardens were, she requested a meeting between residents and Council so the former could air their views. Peter Geary reported that he’d inspected the site very recently, had seen a vehicle parked adjacent to the dropped kerb outside the old NatWest building for some of the time he was present, and vehicles parked on nearby double yellow lines for all that time. So, he felt that double yellow lines adjacent to the dropped kerb would not help – something more physical was required. He hoped that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) officers would draft a proposal to address the issue. Deirdre Bethune noted that the two dropped kerbs near McColls should also be considered. Peter and Jeremy plan to present the petition to the next MKC Cabinet meeting, adding weight to the request. Peter concluded by saying that he hoped a scheme would be drawn up by February.

    Goosey fireworks
    Jeremy Rawlings reported that, on Saturday 17th November, a substantial fireworks’ display had been held on the Goosey. The Council was concerned about this primarily because it was fired from its land without its permission. The land in question is leased to Brian Reynolds, a farmer who grazes sheep there. He wrote to the Council to explain what happened: Brian learned of the event at around 2.30 that afternoon, receiving a text from a dog walker concerned about fireworks being set up in a field near his sheep. He was then called by the fireworks company, Illusion Fireworks, noting they were setting up ‘a few fireworks’ and were concerned about sheep nearby. He agreed to the display, as there’d be only a few fireworks and the sheep would move away. To shorten a rather involved story, as he learned more including the large scale of the display, Brian moved the sheep to a further field, then got to meet the organiser, Joe Wheeler, some time after 7.30 that evening and, ‘after a few strong words’ they settled that the display could go ahead. Kevin Viney was concerned both about the lack of valid permission and the proximity to the sheep. Peter Geary noted that Brian was a very experienced sheep farmer, so Councillors shouldn’t necessarily be more concerned than he about the welfare of his sheep. But, he felt that in any case the display should not have happened. Joanne Eley didn’t think Brian had willingly given his permission – it felt like he’d been ‘strong armed’. Deirdre noted the display had been fired from a similar location for the last few years but the Council had only just realised. Councillors agreed to write to the organiser and fireworks company, stating the display was fired from private land without the landowner’s permission, and that it was very unlikely the Council would ever grant such permission. Finally, and independently of the display, MKC is already looking at siting a stile and locking gate to restrict access to the field from which the display was fired.

    unknown
    Goosey Fireworks


    Chipper
    Tony Evans explained that their current chipper was old and incapable of dealing with thin, bushy material, which therefore had to be burned on his farm – not ideal. A replacement chipper had been chosen, the Recreations and Services Committee proposing the Council purchase it for £9,950. This would be part paid for by the part exchange of a, now almost unused, triple gang Hayter mower for £4,000, plus £500 for the old chipper. Paul Collins noted that the Hayter mower, purchased in 2014 for £17,000 was now to be exchanged for very much less. Tony noted that the mower was bought when Olney took on more landscaping work and, while some found it useful, others did not and, with the Council’s rotary mower more manoeuvrable and able to do everything required, was now rarely used. Peter Geary noted that machinery tended to depreciate quickly after purchase and, as the ground staff’s method of working had moved on, there was no point in leaving it idle in the shed. Des Eley asked why the cost of the Hayter hadn’t been depreciated in the accounts, Liam Costello replying that Council account guidelines are not to depreciate. John Boardman, noted that, with Tony and Peter best qualified to take the decision and in favour, would it not be sensible to vote on Tony’s proposal? After a surprisingly long discussion, Councillors voted in favour of the proposal, eight for, none against with six abstentions. Paul Collins explained that he’d never normally dream of abstaining, but wanted the Council to learn the lesson not to incur big losses due to short term thinking.

    Football Clubhouse
    Olney Town Football Club had agreed to hand back the clubhouse building to the Council, and planned to sign the deed of surrender in the few days after this meeting. Later in the meeting, having voted on whether to exclude press and public, Council was to discuss who the building would then be passed to.

    Standing Orders
    Standing Orders are normally agreed annually during the May Council meeting when the Council re-forms. For various reasons, the Standing Orders due to be agreed in May still haven’t been, with drawing up of ones on which Council could agree having been delegated to a working group – Paul Collins, Des Eley and Peter Geary. The agenda item for this part of the meeting was ‘Standing Orders – To agree a process for reviewing changes, and request that a schedule of proposed changes and reasons be supplied by the working group.’ Liam introduced this item, explaining that the planned agenda item, essentially to adopt the Standing Orders produced by the working group, had been changed to give more time to consider them. Des Eley explained that the Council was meant to adopt the Standing Orders in the May meeting but, with a hard copy of the Orders provided to Council only three days earlier and with no detail of the changes made, there were various queries and they were not adopted – so there were currently no adopted Standing Orders. Jeremy Rawlings interrupted to say that the previously adopted Orders remained in force, Des Eley noting this was ‘possibly’ the case, the minutes not noting a Council decision to adopt the previous ones. Des continued that the last few meetings’ minutes noted the working group would draft the Standing Orders, which were then supplied for review in this meeting. He felt slightly disappointed that they’d not been adopted today, and asked Councillors to put forward their views on the proposed Standing Orders. Jeremy replied that the Council would have the chance to adopt them in the January meeting. Peter Geary felt the way this had worked fell outside the Council’s constitution – the agenda item should have remained unchanged with Councillors able to vote to defer consideration until the next meeting if needed. Liam disagreed noting that, having consulted with Jeremy (the meeting’s chair), he had the right to change the agenda under certain circumstances. Specifically, he felt that some of the changes were not legally sound and noted ‘other concerns’. Following up with Liam after the meeting for clarification, he felt that other changes were not consistent with recent Council decisions, and that the information the working group provided initially did not make clear what the changes were (later rectified). He also cited two of the previously adopted standing orders, 4(d) and 4(e), reproduced below: ● 4(d). If the wording or nature of a proposed motion is considered unlawful or improper, the Proper Officer shall consult with the Mayor or, as the case may be, the Councillors who have convened the meeting, to consider whether the motion shall be included or rejected in the agenda. ● 4(e). Having consulted the Mayor or councillors pursuant to standing order 4(d) above, the decision of the Proper Officer as to whether or not to include the motion in the agenda shall be final. Back to the meeting, Paul Collins stated that, given views had been expressed re certain changes lacking legality, he wanted to see a paper detailing why. Des Eley noted that he wanted the working group to take on the feedback and provide a revised set of Standing Orders. Peter Geary said that Council needed to see the revised Standing Orders. Jeremy concluded the item, stating that the Standing Orders will be available, with tracked changes, to be discussed and voted on in the January meeting. There was clearly a range of views expressed in this part of the meeting and, in the usual way, it is the Town Clerk, Liam, who Mercury calls on with post-meeting questions, requests for context, etc. This is part convention and, reading the Standing Orders relevant to relations with the press/media, presumably also the Council’s intent: ● 28(b). In accordance with the Council’s policy in respect to dealing with the press and/or other media, councillors shall not, in their official capacity, provide oral or written statements or written articles to the press or other media.

    Dickens of a Christmas
    This was part of an agenda item where the Council receives minutes from various subcommittees such as Planning and HR. Again, it’s normally pretty dry but at times more interesting. Joanne Eley reported that the draft minutes of the Dickens of a Christmas meeting did not reflect the meeting accurately. Liam asked her to submit her concerns, which she said she’d do in writing.

    Children’s play areas
    Colin Rodden was frustrated that, while he regularly raised issues related to broken play equipment, such as zip wires and basketball hoops, it needed to become an agenda item in order to ensure ongoing focus and action to resolve the problems. Liam replied that he appreciated this, but the responsibility was with MKC. Peter Geary suggested Liam contact Phil Snell at MKC. If it turned out that equipment was not being repaired because MKC couldn’t afford it, Liam should ask what OTC was meant to do. Either way, it would require OTC to keep raising the issue.

    unknown
    Children's Play Area


    Milton Keynes Eastern expansion
    Peter Geary explained that Milton Keynes Council is looking to apply for £75 million of Government funding from the Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF) towards the Eastern expansion. They’d originally planned to do this in December but now plan to do so in March. Noting that, back in October, he and David Hosking had called in the decision to apply for the HIF bid, he felt that had resulted in the detail behind that bid becoming available for inspection. No decisions will be taken on the design of the development itself until it’s known whether the HIF bid has been accepted – infrastructure must come first. If and when the HIF bid is accepted, and Plan MK insists on the development being required, only then will an implementation plan be drawn up. The bid has been delayed because it’s become clear that Government are scrutinising the value from such bids very carefully, so MKC is working to make a good case. Peter had put forward a motion asking for the HIF bid to be put on hold, but didn’t receive MKC support. Peter concluded by noting that, in parallel with the HIF bid issues above, Mark Lancaster and Iain Stewart had been concerned by the housing deal, which MKC was planning to sign without any corresponding firm Council decision to approximately double the size of Milton Keynes. They’d noted that this could not happen without proper Council agreement, which has resulted in a pause while MKC worked out how to proceed.

    High Street trees
    A High Street resident has contacted the Council because a tree has pierced their sewer and, while Anglian Water has agreed to fix the issue, presumably by lining the pipe, they felt the Council should be aware. Following up with Liam after the meeting, he explained that the Council has for some time been raising issues with MKC about trees on the High Street affecting adjacent properties. MKC hasn’t taken remedial action due to budgetary constraints, but their latest stance is they’ll survey all the trees along the High Street, prioritising the worst for remedial action.

    unknown
    High Street Trees


    Cambridge – Milton Keynes – Oxford Arc
    Des Eley reported that he and Graham Harrison had attended an informative presentation on the Arc, where Des asked for and was promised data on the anticipated extra traffic flow on the A509 due to the forthcoming expressway.

    Pollution monitoring
    Kevin Viney reported that the air quality monitoring equipment near the Church Hall would shortly be replaced, the new equipment measuring NOx levels more frequently, but no longer particulates as they have thus far tracked levels already measured in Milton Keynes. He noted that NOx levels had reduced significantly, now only around half the threshold at which concern would be raised – diesel engines have become cleaner, Jeremy noted. Kevin also noted that the number of cars passing through Olney each weekday is approximately 17,000, North and Southbound combined.

    unknown
    Polution Monitoring


    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    Chris Tenant noted that over 200 young people had undergone heart screening by Cardiac Risk in the Young in the Football Club building over the weekend of 10th to the 11th November. This was made possible by fundraising following the untimely death of Alden Leuan Price in May 2017 due to an undiagnosed heart condition. Chris said that this had been a big success, and he hoped it would be part of an ongoing legacy. Tony Evans explained that Yardley Road would be closed near Olney for periods over the next 18 months for works related to the new housing development near the Industrial Estate, one which OTC had recommended against. He felt that light controlled one way traffic for the affected section of road would be achievable, significantly less disruptive than the closure. Peter Geary noted that requests for such closures are always scrutinised by MKC, but recommended OTC question this one to see if the closure times could be reduced with, for example, the road always being open at weekends. Des Eley proposed replacing the dog bins with ones of a larger size, thus avoiding the need to empty them as often. He believed this would cost around £2,500 and pay for itself in the first two months or so. Jeremy referred this to the Recreations and Services Committee for a decision.

    Highways
    Peter Geary reported that, in the next few weeks, there would be a solution proposed for the One Stop crossing issues, for example illuminated columns for the lights to improve visibility. John Boardman reported that he, a group of Councillors and two representatives from the MKC Highways department had visited East Street. He felt sure that progress had been made towards resurfacing and noted that MKC would consider how best to address the pedestrian safety issue on the ‘S’ bend to the rear of The Two Brewers. Next Meeting - 7th January The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th January 2019 in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.
    -----

    Mercury's reports in our 2019 editions


    Mercury issue for January 2019 (December 2018 meeting Report)

    Public participation Martin Allen was first to speak, with a request that Olney Town Council (OTC) spend some of the Section 106 monies from the development adjacent to the East Street car park on resurfacing the area on the recreation ground between the children’s play park and the MUGA  (Multi-Use Games Area). Jeremy Rawlings passed this request to the Recreations and Services Committee for consideration. Apologies for absence Steve Clark was unwell so could not attend this meeting. Declarations of interest This is the part of the meeting in which individual Councillors can declare their interest in various topics on the agenda. Normally pretty dry, the Mercury report tends to skip this bit. However, this time it was more interesting. After all interests had been declared, Jeremy Rawlings stated he’d been advised that Des Eley should declare an interest in an agenda item to ‘approve costs of mediation process’, Joanne Eley already having done so, while she should declare an interest in an item to ‘consider recommendation from HR Committee regarding Job Evaluations’. Both these items, while on the publicly available agenda, fell in the part of the meeting where public and press were excluded. Des and Joanne chose not to declare these interests. Jeremy concluded the discussion noting that this was what he’d been advised but the decision was up to them. Car parking and dropped kerbs Local resident Debbie Whitworth had passed a 230 signature petition to the Council, asking it to take a long hard look at the appalling car parking situation in the town. In a note to the Council, she took particular issue with poor parking around the Market Place and, as a wheelchair user, felt acutely the effects of selfi sh and inconsiderate parking. She cited an example where carers were attempting to push two elderly patients in wheelchairs across the road near McColls but, with a car parked blocking access to the dropped kerb, had to lift the chairs down a high kerb risking tipping the patients out. Asking where the traffi c wardens were, she requested a meeting between residents and Council so the former could air their views. Peter Geary reported that he’d inspected the site very recently, had seen a vehicle parked adjacent to the dropped kerb outside the old NatWest building for some of the time he was present, and vehicles parked on nearby double yellow lines for all that time. So, he felt that double yellow lines adjacent to the dropped kerb would not help – something more physical was required. He hoped that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) offi cers would draft a proposal to address the issue. Deirdre Bethune noted that the two dropped kerbs near McColls should also be considered. Peter and Jeremy plan to present the petition to the next MKC Cabinet meeting, adding weight to the request. Peter concluded by saying that he hoped a scheme would be drawn up by February. Goosey fireworks Jeremy Rawlings reported that, on Saturday 17th November, a substantial fireworks’ display had been held on the Goosey. The Council was concerned about this primarily because it was fi red from its land without its permission. The land in question is leased to Brian Reynolds, a farmer who grazes sheep there. He wrote to the Council to explain what happened: Brian learned of the event at around 2.30 that afternoon, receiving a text from a dog walker concerned about fi reworks being set up in a fi eld near his sheep. He was then called by the fi reworks company, Illusion Fireworks, noting they were setting up ‘a few fi reworks’ and were concerned about sheep nearby. He agreed to the display, as there’d be only a few fi reworks and the sheep would move away. To shorten a rather involved story, as he learned more including the large scale of the display, Brian moved the sheep to a further fi eld, then got to meet the organiser, Joe Wheeler, sometime after 7.30 that evening and, ‘after a few strong words’ they settled that the display could go ahead. Kevin Viney was concerned both about the lack of valid permission and the proximity to the sheep. Peter Geary noted that Brian was a very experienced sheep farmer, so Councillors shouldn’t necessarily be more concerned than he about the welfare of his sheep. But, he felt that in any case the display should not have happened. Joanne Eley didn’t think Brian had willingly given his permission – it felt like he’d been ‘strong-armed’. Deirdre noted the display had been fi red from a similar location for the last few years but the Council had only just realised. Councillors agreed to write to the organiser and fireworks company, stating the display was fi red from private land without the landowner’s permission, and that it was very unlikely the Council would ever grant such permission. Finally, and independently of the display, MKC is already looking at siting a stile and locking gate to restrict access to the fi eld from which the display was fi red. Chipper Tony Evans explained that their current chipper was old and incapable of dealing with thin, bushy material, which therefore had to be burned on his farm – not ideal. A replacement chipper had been chosen, the Recreations and Services Committee proposing the Council purchase it for £9,950. This would be part paid for by the part exchange of a, now almost unused, triple gang Hayter mower for £4,000, plus £500 for the old chipper. Paul Collins noted that the Hayter mower, purchased in 2014 for £17,000 was now to be exchanged for very much less. Tony noted that the mower was bought when Olney took on more landscaping work and, while some found it useful, others did not and, with the Council’s rotary mower more manoeuvrable and able to do everything required, was now rarely used. Peter Geary noted that machinery tended to depreciate quickly after purchase and, as the ground staff’s method of working had moved on, there was no point in leaving it idle in the shed. Des Eley asked why the cost of the Hayter hadn’t been depreciated in the accounts, Liam Costello replying that Council account guidelines are not to depreciate. John Boardman, noted that, with Tony and Peter best qualifi ed to take the decision and in favour, would it not be sensible to vote on Tony’s proposal? After a surprisingly long discussion, Councillors voted in favour of the proposal, eight for, none against with six abstentions. Paul Collins explained that he’d never normally dream of abstaining, but wanted the Council to learn the lesson not to incur big losses due to short term thinking. Football Clubhouse Olney Town Football Club had agreed to hand back the clubhouse building to the Council, and planned to sign the deed of surrender in the few days after this meeting. Later in the meeting, having voted on whether to exclude press and public, Council was to discuss who the building would then be passed to. Standing Orders Standing Orders are normally agreed annually during the May Council meeting when the Council re-forms. For various reasons, the Standing Orders due to be agreed in May still haven’t been, with drawing up of ones on which Council could agree having been delegated to a working group – Paul Collins, Des Eley and Peter Geary. The agenda item for this part of the meeting was ‘Standing Orders – To agree a process for reviewing changes, and request that a schedule of proposed changes and reasons be supplied by the working group.’ Liam introduced this item, explaining that the planned agenda item, essentially to adopt the Standing Orders produced by the working group, had been changed to give more time to consider them. Des Eley explained that the Council was meant to adopt the Standing Orders in the May meeting but, with a hard copy of the Orders provided to Council only three days earlier and with no detail of the changes made, there were various queries and they were not adopted – so there were currently no adopted Standing Orders. Jeremy Rawlings interrupted to say that the previously adopted Orders remained in force, Des Eley noting this was ‘possibly’ the case, the minutes not noting a Council decision to adopt the previous ones. Des continued that the last few meetings’ minutes noted the working group would draft the Standing Orders, which were then supplied for review in this meeting. He felt slightly disappointed that they’d not been adopted today, and asked Councillors to put forward their views on the proposed Standing Orders. Jeremy replied that the Council would have the chance to adopt them in the January meeting. Peter Geary felt the way this had worked fell outside the Council’s constitution – the agenda item should have remained unchanged with Councillors able to vote to defer consideration until the next meeting if needed. Liam disagreed noting that, having consulted with Jeremy (the meeting’s chair), he had the right to change the agenda under certain circumstances. Specifi cally, he felt that some of the changes were not legally sound and noted ‘other concerns’. Following up with Liam after the meeting for clarification, he felt that other changes were not consistent with recent Council decisions, and that the information the working group provided initially did not make clear what the changes were (later rectifi ed). He also cited two of the previously adopted standing orders, 4(d) and 4(e), reproduced below: ● 4(d). If the wording or nature of a proposed motion is considered unlawful or improper, the Proper Offi cer shall consult with the Mayor or, as the case may be, the Councillors who have convened the meeting, to consider whether the motion shall be included or rejected in the agenda. ● 4(e). Having consulted the Mayor or councillors pursuant to standing order 4(d) above, the decision of the Proper Officer as to whether or not to include the motion in the agenda shall be fi nal. Back to the meeting, Paul Collins stated that, given views had been expressed re certain changes lacking legality, he wanted to see a paper detailing why. Des Eley noted that he wanted the working group to take on the feedback and provide a revised set of Standing Orders. Peter Geary said that Council needed to see the revised Standing Orders. Jeremy concluded the item, stating that the Standing Orders will be available, with tracked changes, to be discussed and voted on in the January meeting. There was clearly a range of views expressed in this part of the meeting and, in the usual way, it is the Town Clerk, Liam, who Mercury calls on with post-meeting questions, requests for context, etc. This is part convention and, reading the Standing Orders relevant to relations with the press/media, presumably also the Council’s intent: 28(b). In accordance with the Council’s policy in respect to dealing with the press and/or other media, councillors shall not, in their offi cial capacity, provide oral or written statements or written articles to the press or other media. Dickens of a Christmas This was part of an agenda item where the Council receives minutes from various subcommittees such as Planning and HR. Again, it’s normally pretty dry but at times more interesting. Joanne Eley reported that the draft minutes of the Dickens of a Christmas meeting did not refl ect the meeting accurately. Liam asked her to submit her concerns, which she said she’d do in writing.
    Children’s play areas Colin Rodden was frustrated that, while he regularly raised issues related to broken play equipment, such as zip wires and basketball hoops, it needed to become an agenda item in order to ensure ongoing focus and action to resolve the problems. Liam replied that he appreciated this, but the responsibility was with MKC. Peter Geary suggested Liam contact Phil Snell at MKC. If it turned out that equipment was not being repaired because MKC couldn’t afford it, Liam should ask what OTC was meant to do. Either way, it would require OTC to keep raising the issue. Milton Keynes Eastern expansion Peter Geary explained that Milton Keynes Council is looking to apply for £75 million of Government funding from the Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF) towards the Eastern expansion. They’d originally planned to do this in December but now plan to do so in March. Noting that, back in October, he and David Hosking had called in the decision to apply for the HIF bid, he felt that had resulted in the detail behind that bid becoming available for inspection. No decisions will be taken on the design of the development itself until it’s known whether the HIF bid has been accepted – infrastructure must come fi rst. If and when the HIF bid is accepted, and Plan MK insists on the development being required, only then will an implementation plan be drawn up. The bid has been delayed because it’s become clear that Government are scrutinising the value from such bids very carefully, so MKC is working to make a good case. Peter had put forward a motion asking for the HIF bid to be put on hold, but didn’t receive MKC support. Peter concluded by noting that, in parallel with the HIF bid issues above, Mark Lancaster and Iain Stewart had been concerned by the housing deal, which MKC was planning to sign without any corresponding firm Council decision to approximately double the size of Milton Keynes. They’d noted that this could not happen without proper Council agreement, which has resulted in a pause while MKC worked out how to proceed. High Street trees A High Street resident has contacted the Council because a tree has pierced their sewer and, while Anglian Water has agreed to fix the issue, presumably by lining the pipe, they felt the Council should be aware. Following up with Liam after the meeting, he explained that the Council has for some time been raising issues with MKC about trees on the High Street affecting adjacent properties. MKC hasn’t taken remedial action due to budgetary constraints, but their latest stance is they’ll survey all the trees along the High Street, prioritising the worst for remedial action.
    Cambridge – Milton Keynes – Oxford Arc Des Eley reported that he and Graham Harrison had attended an informative presentation on the Arc, where Des asked for and was promised data on the anticipated extra traffi c fl ow on the A509 due to the forthcoming expressway. Pollution monitoring Kevin Viney reported that the air quality monitoring equipment near the Church Hall would shortly be replaced, the new equipment measuring NOx levels more frequently, but no longer particulates as they have thus far tracked levels already measured in Milton Keynes. He noted that NOx levels had reduced significantly, now only around half the threshold at which concern would be raised – diesel engines have become cleaner, Jeremy noted. Kevin also noted that the number of cars passing through Olney each weekday is approximately 17,000, North and Southbound combined. Bits ‘n’ bobs Chris Tenant noted that over 200 young people had undergone heart screening by Cardiac Risk in the Young in the Football Club building over the weekend of 10th to the 11th November. This was made possible by fundraising following the untimely death of Alden Leuan Price in May 2017 due to an undiagnosed heart condition. Chris said that this had been a big success, and he hoped it would be part of an ongoing legacy. Tony Evans explained that Yardley Road would be closed near Olney for periods over the next 18 months for works related to the new housing development near the Industrial Estate, one which OTC had recommended against. He felt that light controlled one-way traffic for the affected section of road would be achievable, significantly less disruptive than the closure. Peter Geary noted that requests for such closures are always scrutinised by MKC, but recommended OTC question this one to see if the closure times could be reduced with, for example, the road always being open at weekends. Des Eley proposed replacing the dog bins with ones of a larger size, thus avoiding the need to empty them as often. He believed this would cost around £2,500 and pay for itself in the fi rst two months or so. Jeremy referred this to the Recreations and Services Committee for a decision. Highways Peter Geary reported that, in the next few weeks, there would be a solution proposed for the One Stop crossing issues, for example illuminated columns for the lights to improve visibility. John Boardman reported that he, a group of Councillors and two representatives from the MKC Highways department had visited East Street. He felt sure that progress had been made towards resurfacing and noted that MKC would consider how best to address the pedestrian safety issue on the ‘S’ bend to the rear of The Two Brewers. The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th January in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.


    unknown

    unknown

    unknown

    unknown


    Mercury issue for February 2019 (January 2019 meeting Report)

    Public Participation:
    Parking in Oakdown Crescent: Susan Warren was the first to speak on the ongoing subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent. She said she was disappointed and disgusted that having emailed all the recently elected members of Olney Town Council (OTC) regarding a letter sent to all residents of Weston Road telling them that they would lose their tenancy if they parked in Oakdown Crescent, not one had had the courtesy to reply or comment. They were supposed to ‘be there’ for the residents according to the OTC web site, she said.  At this point, Graham Harrison interjected to say that he had certainly replied. A recent article in the MK Citizen reported on how the Fenny Stratford ward Councillors had obtained £22k to sort out a parking issue for their senior citizens, and Susan asked why OTC could not do the same. Although Milton Keynes Council (MKC) had published a draft proposal plan which includes provision for a reserved ambulance parking space it did not meet the needs of the residents as it was too far away from the majority of properties and should be located more centrally, she felt.  Sue concluded by saying that it was now two years since she had applied for a residents’ parking permit scheme so she was now able to start the process again, which she would be doing the following day. This matter was discussed later as a formal agenda item. Olney Town Colts Football Club Next to speak was Ian Stokes, on behalf of Olney Town Colts Football Club (OTCFC). Ian said the colts now comprised 26 teams, including an adult team and he had on two occasions stated his interest in acquiring certain assets from the now-defunct Olney Town Football Club (OTFC) and taking over the lease of the building. He said he had been in discussion with members of OTC, OTFC and was keen to work with BodyForce, current occupiers of the premises to reach a mutually agreeable solution. He explained that he wanted to retain the town’s 115-year footballing heritage and ensure that the football club, which was originally built by its members, remains a community asset primarily for the benefit of local non-profit making sports clubs.  This matter was discussed later in the meeting under Confidential Items after the press and public had been excluded.

    unknown
    Market Place Surface


    Changes to Standing Orders
    Standing Orders: Standing orders are the written rules of a local council. They are used to confirm a council’s internal organisational, administrative and procurement procedures and procedural matters for meetings. They are not the same as the policies of a council, but they may refer to them.  As reported last month, Standing Orders due to be agreed in May still haven’t been, with drawing up of ones on which Council could agree having been delegated to a working group – Paul Collins, Des Eley and Peter Geary.  At last month’s meeting, it was agreed to defer the review to the January meeting, due to the complexity of the changes and the short notice councillors had to review them.  During the section of the meeting to approve the minutes of the previous meeting, Des Eley asked for the recording of the previous meeting to be reviewed as he did not think the minutes accurately reflected what was said. He introduced the item this month saying that a working group had reviewed the existing Standing Orders and produced a revised set.  Peter Geary said it would be necessary to review the document line by line as the majority of changes would not cause any problems, but some might. Des was clearly frustrated and said that the document had been widely circulated in advance and should not contain any surprises if councillors had read it. He said it had been produced using the model produced by the National Association of Local Councils, rather than basing it on the existing OTC Standing Orders to reduce the risk of ‘errors and inconsistencies’.  Mayor Jeremy Rawlings expressed his opinion that the council were mainly interested in the differences between what previously existed and what was being proposed. The tone of the meeting was becoming considerably heated by this stage, and Tony Evansreminded members that one of the existing Standing Orders stated that only one person should speak at a time and members should abide by it! Peter Geary suggested that it should be put to the bottom of the agenda and discussed if time allowed, but Kevin Viney thought that a separate meeting should be held as it would take too long to debate, given the time constraints of regular OTC meetings. Joanne Eley pointed out that the item had been pulled from last month’s agenda and needed addressing.  Eventually, a vote was held as to whether to defer to a future meeting with seven for and seven against. Mayor Jeremy Rawlingsused his casting vote, and it was agreed to hold a separate meeting on January 14th.

    unknown
    Barclays Bank in Olney


    Traffic Regulation Orders
    MKC have completed the required 21 day consultation period for two Traffic Regulation Orders in the town. The first is ‘To introduce ‘no waiting at any time’ restrictions (double yellow lines) in front at the crossing point on Market Place, Olney (opposite the war memorial)’.  This will have the effect of making it an enforceable offence to park in front of the drop-down kerb by McColl’s. 
    Colin Roddenobserved that there are a number of other broken yellow lines which need to be repainted. Deirdre Bethune noted that the hatching outside the old Nat West Bank is widely ignored and thought that the installation of bollards was the only Solution. Peter Geary said that this was being investigated. The second Traffic Regulation Order referred to the location of the ambulance space in Oakdown Crescent. Although it is not in the position that Susan Warren had requested MKC advised that it is the most central to service all properties in Oakdown Crescent, being less than 50 metres from any property and adjacent to a drop-down kerb. Peter Geary said it would be completed this financial year, assuming weather conditions permit.
    Planning Matters
    At the recent meeting of the 
    Planning Committee concerns were raised about the advertising on the new Smart Gents Turkish Barbershop in the Market Place. As the shop is in a conservation area it was felt that a planning application should have been submitted to MKC. The matter was referred to the MKC Enforcement Officer, but no response had been received.
     
    Milton Keynes Eastern expansion
    Desmond Eley said that the MK Eastern expansion is ongoing and in the latest plan Olney and Woburn are identified as ‘Key Settlements’ for expansion, although all expansion will be via Neighbourhood Plans (NPs). There is no further expansion planned for Olney outside of the current NP as MK now has a Five Year Land Supply.  Chris Tennant was certain that Plan MK, the new Local Plan for Milton Keynes, will be adopted so it essential that the existing Olney NP be reviewed in 18 months’ time as the National Planning Policy Framework published in 2018 will take precedence. Desmond Eley said that any modification to the NP must include growth and would need a further public referendum so funding would be required. Town Clerk Liam Costello replied that it depended on the nature of the modification.

    Connie’s Colander – The Human Story Theatre
    A request has been received from Michelle Herriman of MK Libraries asking for the council’s support in staging a short play entitled Connie’s Colander which explores the subject of dementia, in the Olney Centre in May or June 2019. The 50-minute play would be followed by a 20 minute post-show Q&A session with a dementia expert. More information can be found by searching ‘Connie’s Colander’ on YouTube. The council agreed by a majority to support the production.

    Olney Rugby 7s
    Olney Rugby Club has informed the council that they will be running the hugely popular 7s festival on Saturday 22nd June. The council agreed that the football pitch can be used for parking, like last year, and also the strip of land outside the clubhouse itself, subject to weather conditions.

    Silent Soldier benches
    Following considerable interest on The Olney Noticeboard Facebook group, the council have purchased two Silent Soldier benches, which will be placed adjacent to the war memorial. There were many offers of funding support from members of the public, so that a JustGiving page is to be created.

    Market Place surface
    Tony Evans reported that the surface of the Market Place is in a bad state and sooner or later OTC will need to ‘bite the bullet’ and repair it. This could be in the form of:
    ● Patching up ● Digging out the worst parts and resurfacing ● Resurfacing the entire Market Place
    Steve Clark agreed, noting that it was a trip hazard and, in wet weather, deep puddles were forming. He suggested the council obtain rough costings so that the work could be budgeted for in the future. Joanne Eley reminded members that the council was still in dispute with EON over the poor quality of the workmanship when the new electric posts were installed, and they should wait until that was resolved before rushing into any repairs. 

    unknown
    Broken play equipment in Johnsons Field


    Odds and Sods
    The 
    CCTV in the Market Place is now working again. If it proves to be stable then the council will consider moving to a centrally monitored system, rather than the on-request retrospective access to footage that is currently in place. The resurfacing of the footpath between the tennis courts and the council compound came in considerably over budget due to the inaccurate information shown on the marker posts installed by Anglian Water. Des Eley suggested that Anglian Water should be asked to make up the difference. The footpath between Olney and Weston Underwood is once again navigable since MKC cut back the bushes. However, it was noted that the footpath is getting progressively narrower as soil spills down the banks. Colin Rodden asked what was happening about the damaged play equipment on Johnsons Field, which is the responsibility of MKC. Peter Geary replied that MKC had suggested that Section 106 funding could be used, but that was not appropriate since it is supposed to be used for new locations. Kevin Viney noted that the repairs to Barclays Bank seemed to be taking a long time. Liam Costello said he had written to Barclays asking about their plans but had received no response. The contractors on site have been told that the bank will reopen. Malcolm Messenger said he had received a complaint about the configuration of the baby changing facilities in the Olney Centre toilets which could result in a baby being knocked off by an opening door.
    Next Meeting - Monday 4th February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    Olney Council report for March Issue 2019 (February 2019 meeting)

    Public Participation
    There were 11 members of the public present for the public participation section of the meeting this month, with six of them wishing to speak. Normally this section of the meeting is restricted to five participants, each being permitted to address the council for a maximum of three minutes, but Mayor Jeremy Rawlings agreed to make an exception this month.
    Stuart Dorrill First to speak was Stuart Dorrill, owner of Bodyforce who have used the Olney Town Football Club (OTFC) premises for the last nine years and are now looking to take on the full lease on a permanent basis since the demise of the Football Club. Stuart presented letters of support for the work he is doing from a number of organisations and individuals, including Cobbs Garden Surgery, Ousedale School, Dr Ian Fletcher (Principle Lecturer at the University of Bedfordshire School of Sport Science & Physical Activity), and Phil Pask (Consultant Physiotherapist England Rugby). Stuart said he had asked his members to send emails of support for his application to OTC but had not anticipated that around 150 would do so, which he said he found humbling to read and sent a powerful message of what is possible with commitment and vision. He finished by saying he was looking forward to working with other sports clubs and the wider community for many years to come.

    Danny Whitington Next to speak was Danny Whitington. Danny said that seven years ago he was recently divorced, leading an unhealthy party lifestyle and was very unfit. With his responsible and stressful job, he said his life could easily have imploded, but after meeting Stuart and starting to train with him within three months he’d had a drastic change in body and mind and changed his entire lifestyle and diet. Three years later he and his partner trained until she was 34 weeks pregnant and after an emergency C Section at 42 weeks was back training three months later, under Stuart’s careful guidance. The clubhouse was not just a training facility but a home to 650 members of the Bodyforce family, he said. Danny then handed over to his son Tom, aged 13. In an at times emotional speech Tom said that he enjoyed Caveman (a Bodyforce class) because it made him feel more prepared for a rugby match and more confident in sport. Without Caveman he wouldn’t have achieved his current athletic abilities, now being the fastest 100m sprinter at Ousedale and playing in the rugby A team. Caveman and Stuart mean a lot to him and his family, he said. Steve Price Next was Steve Price who explained that his son, Alden, had died suddenly in May 2017 from Young Sudden Cardiac Death. Subsequently, Stuart and the Bodyforce family had raised over £11k for the charity Cardiac Risk in the Young (CRY) and organised a heart screening day in Olney where 211 young people had been screened for the condition. As a result, one of them had been referred to their GP, potentially saving their life. Peter Gage Next was Peter Gage who spoke on behalf of Olney Town Colts Football Club (OTCFC) and their application to take over the lease of the clubhouse. He explained that he had been a keen supporter of the colts for many years and they had started with just three teams and now had 26. He said the colts would like to retain the history and legacy of football in Olney and lease at least part of the building. If this didn’t happen it would be akin to ‘air-brushing’ out the history of football in the town, he said. The likes of Denis Timpson and the final committee members, which he named individually, had devoted their entire lives to the club would be ‘air-brushed’ out, he believed. He concluded by going around the table, naming councillors and asking them if they would be prepared to meet those individuals and tell them of such a decision.  Ian Stokes Finally, on this matter, Ian Stokes spoke on behalf of Olney Town Colts Football Club (OTCFC). Ian said he was ‘wearing three hats’: First as Chairman of OTCFC, secondly as a life member of OTFC but thirdly, as someone who is passionate about local sport. Ian said he wanted to work with Stuart and Bodyforce to build and maintain a legacy (of football) and suggested the matter ought to be opened to form a wider debate. It was not right that the matter of the building lease was only discussed by OTC in the confidential items part of the agenda when public and press had been excluded, he said. Mike Totton Mike Totton spoke on behalf of the Allotment Association regarding the educational cabin on the Community Allotment Plot. Mike said that at the November OTC meeting the council had agreed to provide 50% of the funding for the cabin, which was assumed to include installation of electricity and water. However, the cost of installing electricity had turned out to be an extra £13,000, for which a £10,000 lottery grant was being sought. The association wish to push forward with the erection of the cabin as soon as possible so Mike asked if the council would sanction handing over the funds to build the base and cabin alone, which would amount to approximately £10,000. The association will then take responsibility for raising the funding for the rest of the work, he said.

    unknown
    Olney Town Football Club


    Closure of Barclay’s bank
    Barclays Bank have informed OTC and customers that the Olney Branch will not re-open following the ram-raid on the cash machine last year. Kevin Viney said that the letters had said that the decision was made on the single criteria that fewer members of the public were using it. However, all banks have signed up to a code to fully consult with communities should they propose a closure for the ‘last bank standing’ and a robbery should not alter that prior sequence of discussion. OTC had written to Barclays offering any help it could after the raid but had not received a reply, he said. The nearest branch would now be Milton Keynes, but many small businesses in town need cash facilities, he added. A meeting will take place in March between Kevin and Deirdre Bethune on behalf of OTC, Barclays, and MP Mark Lancaster, where the case will be made to save the bank from closure by reminding them of the future growth and wealth creation in Olney, with new houses and businesses that have already received planning permission. Peter Geary said it was important that the council’s standpoint was clear, otherwise Barclays would simply walk out of the meeting. Deirdre Bethune said the bank provided an essential service for the elderly, some of whom do not use ‘plastic’ or on-line banking.
     

    unknown
    Last Bank Standing


    Proposed charge for use of Market Place
    The council is considering making a charge for events that use the Market Place, such as 
    The Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF), Motorama and Dickens of a Christmas. Town Clerk Liam Costello noted that the charge for commercial events, such as the special food markets is £400 per day. Jeremy Rawlings pointed out that there is usually an actual cost to the council in hosting these events. The fact that a new electricity distribution system has recently been installed and that the surface is now in urgent need of repair or replacement is seen as justification. Peter Geary pointed out that this might impact the rates that OTC pay (presumably to MKC) for the Market Place and Kevin Viney observed that most of the events mentioned were community events which also raised money for charity. Steve Clark noted that such events bring people into the town and a charge in the region of the commercial cost of £400 might make organisers think twice about the viability of the events. It was agreed to discuss with the organisers of these events before making a decision.

    Closure of Emberton School
    Emberton School currently has no pupils on its role, and the Governing Board have asked MKC to consult on closure. This eight-week consultation is currently underway and will end on 17th March. After this, the necessary Statutory Notices will be published followed by a representation period before a final decision is made. Birth data indicates that a small number of children in the catchment area are due to start school in 2019, but there are sufficient places at other local schools to accommodate them and parental choice in recent years has shown that the school is not a popular choice for parents. There is currently no demand expected from new housing in the local area.

    Budgetary matters
    Paul Collins reported back from the Finance Committee, summarising the draft budget proposals and proposed increase in the precept (the element of the Council Tax collected by MKC and paid to OTC to provide certain services).  A number of factors such as increased staff costs, essential refurbishments and lower than predicted income from various sources meant that to avoid a shortfall it would be necessary to increase the precept by approximately 20%. This equates to a £15 increase per year on an average Band D property. It was also agreed to increase the schedule of fees that OTC charges for allotmentsmarket stalls and venue hires etc. in line with CPI. A vote on the budget proposals was taken and passed unanimously.

    MK East Local Stakeholder Group
    Steve Clark reported that he had recently attended a meeting of the MK East Local Stakeholder Group where a presentation on Traffic Modelling had been given. The (obvious) context was that the existing highway network is not and will not be sufficient to accommodate the MKE expansion without new strategic infrastructure investment. Minimal infrastructure investment would lead to massive and unacceptable delays to journeys, so a number of options have been considered:
    ● Improvements at Junction 14 ● Enhanced capacity through A422 Corridor ● Widening of the Willen Road Corridor and bridge over M1 ● A new Bridge over the M1
    Of these, a new bridge is considered the best option and six possibilities have been considered, although all but one ruled out and that is subject to a bid for Housing Infrastructure Funding. Modelling of all schemes predicted ‘tidal flow’ rush hour traffic increases through Olney of 5%.

    unknown
    Roundel painted on the Road along Aspreys


    Odds and Sods
    The amended 
    Standing Orders, discussed at length in previous meetings, are being drafted and will be discussed at a future meeting. The Lions will be holding Motorama on Sunday 9th June in the Market Place. The ‘One-Stop’ pedestrian crossing is due to be improved with illuminated posts and improved street lighting but no confirmation from MKC that it will be in this financial year. The 30mph ‘roundel’ painted on the road along Asprey meant that police could not legally enforce the speed limit since that is no longer legal signage. It has recently been removed, meaning that enforcement will now be possible.

    Next Meeting - Monday 4th March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    Mercury issue for March 2019 (February 2019 meeting)

    Public Participation
    For the first time in many a year there were no members of the public wishing to speak at this month’s meeting. A reminder that any resident can choose to address the council at the start of each meeting, by giving prior notice to the clerk, and will be given three minutes in which to speak. Officially there should be no discussion on matters raised in this section and any items requiring further discussion would be added to the formal agenda of the next meeting. In reality the mayor will often apply common sense and allow a limited response, if appropriate.

    Minutes of previous meetings
    Standing Orders of Olney Town Council: There has been considerable debate at previous meetings on proposed amendments to the Standing Orders of Olney Town Council (OTC). The minutes of the January meeting document these changes in considerable detail and approval of the minutes of that meeting would presumably be deemed as acceptance of those changes.  Paul Collins said that he had many comments on the revisions and felt that the council would have benefited from a meeting between the dedicated working group and Liam Costello, the Town Clerk, before this meeting.  Peter Geary thought that there was a need to listen to the audio recording of the January meeting to ensure that the minutes were an accurate reflection of what was discussed and agreed.  Liam said that in his opinion the minutes were an accurate record of what was agreed, and he had advised members that some of the proposals were not legally sound, but his advice had been ignored.  Deirdre Bethune asked that her displeasure that the Clerk’s advice on the legality of the amendments had been ignored to be formally recorded.

    Closure of Emberton School
    As reported last month Emberton School currently has no pupils on its role and the Governing Board have asked MKC to consult on closure. This eight-week consultation is currently under way and will end on 17th March. OTC have decided not to comment on this matter, the feeling being that the school is going to close, anyway. It was noted that the Emberton Neighbourhood Plan includes new housing on the existing School playing fields.

    Closure of Barclays Bank
    Kevin Viney reported back on the meeting between OTC, Mark Lancaster MP and representatives of Barclays Bank. He felt it had been constructive but Barclays definition of what constituted ‘a customer’ when determining the amount of business, and therefore justification to remain open, was rather suspect. Barclays had claimed that the Olney Branch had only 140 active customers, but their definition of a customer is someone who is dependent on that branch alone and has no access to an alternative branch. By definition, even if you are a regular user and your account is registered elsewhere or you have the ability to travel to another branch you are not a customer. They claimed there had been only two complaints about the closure.  Deirdre Bethune said it was clear that Barclays had no intention of reopening in Olney but might consider setting up an office where they could assist customers by providing advice on alternative ways to access their accounts, but there would be no transactions of any type. Peter Geary said that 800 ‘customers’ had used the bank in the month previous to the closure and there had been 23,000 transactions in the previous year. He was also concerned about the state of the building and said pressure must be maintained to ensure that Barclays comply with their obligation to repair the frontage.

    OTC Communications Policy
    The first draft of a document setting out OTC’s 
    Policy for Internal and External Communications was presented for discussion. It sets out the council’s commitment to use a multi-channel approach to communications including public announcementsemail alerts, their websiteprinted material and social media.  The policy is based 90% on the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity issued by central government and 10% bespoke additions from OTC.  Peter Geary questioned the statement that ‘Any public communication from councillors or staff (in their official capacity) should reflect current council policy and not a personal view.’ The job of a councillor, he said, is to represent people not council policy. OTC is not a cabinet with collective responsibility.  Steve Clark agreed, using the example of OTC charging event organisers for use of the Market Place. Until a decision on that matter is made, he is free to express his personal opinion, he said.  Peter responded that even after such a decision individual member have the right to express their own opinions. Council staff have a responsibility to back council policy but councillors do not, he said. The document lists examples of face to face negative body languages which may be viewed as undermining the council’s compassionate workplace cultures including eye rollingtuttingsighingglaringfinger tappingfinger pointing, and aggressive gesturingPeter asked that excessive sarcasm also be included.  Mercury can only hope that once this policy is adopted we will see an end to the difficult atmosphere that has been apparent at some OTC meetings in recent months.

    Riverfest and Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF)
    Requests to hold the following events were received and granted:
    Riverfest on July 6th and 7th.
    Big Olney Food Festival on 14th and 15th September. Deirdre Bethune, as a member of the BOFF committee, reported that the exact nature and duration of this year’s event was still under discussion.

    Olney hanging baskets
    Each year the lampposts through the centre of the town are adorned with floral hanging baskets, which are erected by a team of volunteers. This popular feature was initiated many years ago by the 
    Floral Fiesta committee and continued by successor groups, including The Olney Group (TOG) and Olney Events helpers. The baskets have always been provided by C.T. Wilson and Sons, who have now offered to fully fund the provision of the baskets. Previously this funding was obtained by offering local businesses, groups and individuals the opportunity to sponsor a basket, but the cost of watering and ongoing maintenance fell to OTC. This sponsorship will still be sought but it will be used to fund the ongoing maintenance.

    Olney Development Group
    This is the sub-committee that has been set up to implement the proposals set out in the 
    Neighbourhood Plan. It was confirmed that the ‘Site R’ (corner of Lavendon Road) will be occupied by Sainsburys with completion due in September/ October. The future of the remaining two acres is uncertain, since it is earmarked in the Neighbourhood Plan (NP) for retail use but the developer, Angle, has been unable to find a retail tenant to occupy the site. As a result, it has entered into a partnership with McCarthy and Stone to develop the site for age-restricted and assisted living accommodation use, contrary to the NP. A public consultation event will take place at the Olney Centre on 27th March. Deirdre Bethune expressed the opinion that such a development would not provide much in the way of employment since there would be very little care support. Steve Clark said it was obvious that Angle had set up the relationship with McCarthy and Stone in order to push through the development and members should be careful when expressing an opinion on the matter. Kevin Viney agreed, saying that there was an element of ‘railroading’ taking place and he was disappointed that one Ward Councillor had already posted information on social media without stating that it was in violation of the NP. John Boardman was concerned that Angle might use the event to take an unofficial ‘straw poll’ to gauge public support which might be used in support of their application. Peter Geary said regardless of this the public had voted for and adopted the NP which allocated the site for retail and that McCarthy and Webster were proposing a large development on a small plot of land. They would not have come on board unless they were reasonably confident of success, he thought, and any planning application would test Milton Keynes Council’s (MKC) planning policy with regard to NPs.

    Liam Costello
    It was announced that Town Clerk has tendered his resignation and is currently working out his notice. 
    Deirdre Bethune said she would like to record her gratitude for his work with OTC, a view that was echoed by other members.

    Recycling sacks
    Since the sacks have ceased to be obtainable from local outlets many residents have experienced difficulty in obtaining new sacks. 
    Peter Geary said it was clear that some residents were managing to obtain supplies, but others were not. 
    Clerk Liam Costello said that when the sacks had been obtainable from the council office in the Olney Centre it had caused considerable disruption to the staff. He felt that a better solution would have been for the sacks to be held in the library, which is open and weekends and is staffed by MKC employees. 
    Steve Clark 
    was of the opinion that MKC is employing an element of rationing. 
    Deirdre Bethune said she had observed sacks that were not being filled efficiently because large items such as cardboard boxes were not being broken down. There was also evidence that people are using the bags to take donations to charity shops, since they are considered to be ‘free’. 

    Odds and Sods
    Malcolm Messenger said that he had noticed many examples of bad parking on the High Street with large vehicles sticking out into the road or overhanging the kerb, and felt that the police and PCSOs should be ticketing such vehicles. John Boardmanreminded members that some years ago a similar approach was proposed but MKC had advised that overhanging the kerb was permissible due to the wide pavements in Olney. The ‘One-Stop’ pedestrian crossing is due to be improved with illuminated posts but there is still no confirmation from MKC that it will be in this financial year. Peter Geary said that additional lighting will be provided by ‘turning up’ the brightness of the adjacent street lights. It appears that when the new LED street lights were installed, they were deliberately ‘dulled down’ to avoid causing annoyance to nearby residents.

    Next Meeting - Monday 1st April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 1st April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    Mercury issue for May 2019 (April 2019 meeting)

    Public Participation
    Elaine Herniman was first to speak, following up her November 2018 meeting contribution about creating a communal area within the allotments. The plan is to remove two old sheds and replace them with a modular cabin building. She was unclear what kind of grants and support Olney Town Council (OTC) could offer towards the project, and asked if a discussion on this could be added to the agenda of the next Recreations and Services Committee meeting.
    Nigel Birrell was last to speak. He’s planning to hold a silent vigil in front of the War Memorial starting at 1pm on Thursday 27th June and ending 24 hours later on the 100th anniversary of the Treaty of Versailles signing. He asked the Council’s permission to do this.

    Absence
    Des and Joanne Eley were absent from this meeting.

    Minutes
    The minutes of January’s meeting to consider the proposed changes to Standing Orders were, following a significant number of amendments, finally approved.

    Silent Vigil
    Council quickly agreed to Nigel’s request, thinking it an excellent idea.

    One Stop zebra crossing
    The safety of pedestrians using the zebra crossing near One Stop continues to cause concern for Councillors and the Public. 
    Kevin Viney, noting that he was still receiving residents’ complaints on the matter, started the discussion by showing Councillors a picture of one large lorry overtaking another parked lorry, which was delivering to One Stop. He explained that delivery lorries parking there meant that pedestrians crossing from the One Stop side were unable to see Northbound traffic, with that traffic also unable to see them, until they started to cross. A Facebook survey conducted by OTC, and with around 800 responses, saw about two-thirds in favour of a traffic light controlled crossing, the remainder preferring improvements to the existing zebra crossing. As noted by David Hosking on Facebook, these improvements would amount to “a high performance illuminated post system featuring a robust high-strength design with low energy and low maintenance light sources, available with either a post-top beacon or a mid-post beacon with a post extension enabling floodlight fitting.” Steve Clark explained that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) was not prepared to install a traffic light controlled crossing, but would install the illuminated post system and increase the brightness of the surrounding street lights. He felt it would be silly to lose this opportunity, so OTC should agree with MKC’s proposal, reserving the right to ask for an alternative if safety problems persist. Councillors noted a number of problems associated with the crossing: Delivery lorries parking near One Stop causing overtaking and reduced visibility, excessive speed of traffic, the curve of the road naturally reducing Northbound drivers’ visibility, a nearby tree further obscuring visibility, and the presence of a number of perhaps distracting vertical bollards installed to stop parking on the pavement immediately South West of the crossing. Some Councillors including Chris Tennant felt OTC should fight for the traffic light controlled crossing, others feeling it should accept the illuminated poles then fight for the traffic lights if needed. Peter Geary noted that, on zebra crossings, most pedestrians don’t cross until the traffic has stopped, unlike on traffic light controlled crossings where they cross the moment the green man illuminates. Neither can be completely safe, he said. He explained that MKC’s decision was not driven by cost, but instead by its safety audits that found the zebra crossing safer than a traffic light controlled one. The Council decided to agree with MKC’s recommendation for illuminated poles and associated works, reserving the right to ask again if those improvements didn’t help.

    Human resources
    The H
    uman Resources Committee had met twice since last month’s full OTC meeting. Colin Rodden felt that, in the interests of transparency, the minutes of those meetings should, like those from other Committees, be available for all Councillors to read. The Committee was happy for that to happen, he explained. Jeremy Rawlings disagreed, offering to discuss another time, perhaps during the busy programme of confidential items covered later in this meeting after exclusion of Press and Public. These items included the Town Clerk’s finishing daterecruitment of a new Town Clerk and staff grievances.

    Olney Centre office changes
    The Olney Centre office is being reconfigured, with plans prepared and quotes sought by the Olney Centre Management Committee. It had not proved possible to obtain three quotes, so just the two received were discussed. Councillors preferred the first quote and voted by majority – seven for, two against and one abstention – to accept it. Colin Rodden felt unable to express a preference without seeing the plans and, again noting lack of transparency, was one of those voting against. 

    East Street
    As reported before, pedestrian safety on the narrow section of East Street immediately South of the Recreation Ground gate continues to be a problem. 
    Chris Tennant reported that he and John Boardman had attended a site visit with a representative from MKC, and the following options were considered: Installing priority traffic signs (one way has priority) – not viable due to limited visibility; Installing traffic lights – not viable due to dwelling exits on the affected stretch of road; Add speed cushions along the affected stretch, and a zebra crossing adjoining the path from the High Street – viable; Change the whole of East Street to one way Northbound with associated traffic calming, and add a new 1.2m wide footpath along the affected stretch – viable, but a very significant and likely unpopular step. As a short-term measure, MKC plans to install ‘pedestrians in road’ signage in the next month or so.

    unknown
    East Street


    Speed Watch
    Colin Rodden reported that various concerned residents had contacted him to ask if Olney Community Speed Watch could target specific roads in the Town. He explained that resourcing these extra requests would require additional volunteers, which he’d be happy to have trained to perform the checks. Feeling that the community needed to ‘own’ the Speed Watch effort to an extent, he planned to encourage interested residents to assist.

    Dickens stalls decision
    The Dickens of a Christmas Committee had decided and minuted that there will be no stalls to the shop side of the road along the South side of the Market Place; a controversial issue with last year’s event.

    Market Place lines
    The South and North East sections of the Market Place road will be re-lined, yellow lines conservation yellow, to see if parking improves. As reported before, this has been causing concern, particularly where it blocks dropped kerbs installed for those with reduced mobility. This is expected to happen soon.

    unknown
    Market Place Road Markings


    Olney Town Football Club Lease
    One of the confidential items discussed after exclusion of Press and Public was related to the Football Club. Although this news came after the meeting, it was likely discussed during that item: OTC has unanimously decided, subject to successful negotiations, to lease the entire Olney Town Football Club building to BodyForce, the new Northern extension remaining with Olney Town Colts.

    unknown
    Olney Town Football Club


    Next meeting - 13th May The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 13th May in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    Mercury issue for June 2019 (May Council Meeting 2019)

    Public Participation
    One person spoke in this slot. They’d been informed that family decorations made to a close relative’s grave fell outside those allowed by the rules, but had discovered those rules only on being told of their breaking them.

    Election of roles
    Each May, the Council’s various roles and responsibilities are decided. This year saw two candidates for Mayor, Jeremy Rawlings and Des Eley. Jeremy won the resulting vote seven to six, and is thus Mayor of Olney for a third year. Thanking those present, he told those who voted for Des that this would be his final year as Mayor. On to Deputy Mayor, Sally Pezaro was elected unopposed for another year. She thanked those present.

    Apologies for absence
    During the review of last month’s minutes, Joanne Eley asked they be amended from noting “Absent: Desmond Eley and Joanne Eley” to state that these absences had been apologised for in advance. The minutes will be changed accordingly. Last month’s Mercury report covered this in a similar vein to the minutes, and the Phonebox Magazine regrets any concern caused regarding the wording.

    Standing Orders
    Last month’s minutes were also challenged by Des Eley, who felt the wording “Standing Orders – are finished with” conflicted with three clauses having been referred to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) for advice. While that advice had now been received and the opportunity to discuss and conclude the wording had become available, the clauses had not yet been resolved, he said. The minutes will be amended to reflect that these clauses remain outstanding.

    Crossing near One Stop
    Colin Rodden raised the issue of the High Street crossing near One Stop. Work is due to be performed to improve safety, but Jeremy Rawlings noted this would not be the whole solution. He’d seen a person with three children start to cross while traffic was flowing in both directions. Education on safe use was also required, he felt.

    Remaining annual business
    This part of the meeting centred on reviewing the Scheme of Delegation, the membership of the various committees, the Council’s representation on various external organisations, the Standing Orders and the Financial Regulations. Sometimes mundane, it was at times chaotic, reflecting a Council on its way through a period of significant change and with much to do, and with the vacant Town Clerk position expected to remain unfilled until August or September. Summarising a lengthy discussion, the key points were: The Human Resources (HR) Committee will be disbanded and replaced by full Council, with Standing Orders updated to match. In theory, the Public could attend these HR  meetings but, given the content, much of the discussion would be after exclusion of Press and Public so there’d be little to hear. Peter Geary noted it had been a turbulent year for the HR Committee, due to its failings over the three or so previous years – missed appraisals, etc. Joanne Eley suggested a rota be arranged for HR training to fix some misunderstandings apparently brought out by a report which had been conducted. The Standing Orders were approved, bar the pending changes for the HR Committee and the three clauses noted earlier. This represents an important step forward, it having taken many months to get this far. Des Eley noted that Standing Orders require that a review of Olney Town Council (OTC) land, other assets and insurable risks be conducted in this meeting, yet it was not on the agenda. Jeremy said it would be added for next month. Finally, the Council representatives attending the Milton Keynes Eastern Expansion meetings, Steve Clark and Des Eley, will be included in its list of representation on various external organisations.

    Receiving minutes of committee meetings
    The Council often spends significant time discussing the minutes of its subcommittees, under a recurring agenda item to ‘receive’ them. This will change, minutes of future meetings remaining in Councillors’ briefing packs but their reception no longer  appearing as an agenda item – so they’d no longer be discussed. This month, they were discussed briefly, a couple of amendments being requested including one by Paul Collins to the Finance Committee meeting minutes, the content of which was not expressed.

    Bits ‘n’ pieces
    Section 106 agreements are arrangements made between local authorities and developers that can be attached to a planning permission to mitigate the impact of development on the local community and infrastructure. For example, new houses imply more use of local parks. Chris Tenant has prepared a Section 106 Contributions Tracker, to allow Council to keep an eye on the money available to draw on, and how it would be spent. Certain events happened in Emberton Park over Easter Weekend which will result in the resurrection of the currently defunct Emberton Park Liaison Users Group (PLUG) as a body to better manage such problems. Councillors felt this a welcome move. Following a couple of break-ins to the tractor shed over the last few months, Councillors discussed various security measures and will obtain quotes.

    Citizen’s Advice
    Each year, Councillors decide whether to continue to fund the Olney based Citizen’s Advice community outreach programme. Deidre Bethune felt it an easy ‘yes’, while Joanne Eley disagreed. An interesting debate followed. Joanne felt it was a pure duplication of services also available from MKC and for which Citizen’s Advice is bidding. Peter Geary disagreed. Noting it was a difficult issue, he said the service was crucial for those who receive the benefit, the alternative being a bus trip to Milton Keynes, a few hours queuing for the service, and a bus trip back – the best part of a day. He felt it a real benefit, MKC having cut all funding to Citizen’s Advice and saying the Parishes could support it. Joanne asked if MKC had changed its tack, Peter noting it had cut funding in October 2018. Des Eley questioned this, claiming that MKC had a duty to provide these services, and Peter responded that perhaps that was relevant to homelessness prevention rather than the outreach being discussed here. The decision went to a vote, in favour by majority of continued funding.

    Olney Middle School parking
    Colin Rodden raised the issue of parking on Yardley Road near Olney Middle School at pick-up and drop-off times, noting the context of a recent lively discussion of the topic on the Olney Noticeboard. Jeremy Rawlings explained that parents’ parking was a tricky issue for many schools, having direct experience of it at Olney Infant Academy. Joanne Eley felt the nearby bus stop had to be safe for bus drivers to use, a topic raised by one of the drivers in a recent Council meeting. Jane Brushwood noted that MKC had been asked to look into the issue.



    Mercury issue in July 2019 (June 2019 meeting)


    Public Participation
    Amanda Molcher First to speak was Amanda Molcher, volunteer and trustee at the Cowper & Newton Museum. Various local walking routes have been created and, if you’re interested in local history, surf to http://www.mktrails.org/olney.html to see a couple of them. Catherine Rose Catherine Rose spoke next. In January, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) had declared a climate emergency as part of its new Sustainability Strategy, promising to make Milton Keynes carbon neutral by 2030. She encouraged people to join the Olney Sustainable Futures Facebook group, and asked if Olney Town Council (OTC) was willing to host a discussion to see what action it could take to help save the planet. Des Eley suggested that the Olney Ward Forum might be the best place to discuss it. Two members of the public spoke regarding decorations they’d placed on their families’ graves. These had apparently fallen outside the usage rules for the Cemetery, and each criticised OTC about the rules themselves, their lack of visibility, and how the subject had been communicated to them. Brian Rice Brian Rice was last to speak, on the subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent. Noting it’d been two years since he last spoke about this, he said parking had reached saturation point, with ever more vehicles competing for the same space. He said it was affecting property values and quality of life, yet appeared to have dropped from OTC’s agenda. He said that, if the Council was doing nothing about it, he and other affected residents would initiate legal action against OTC and MKC due to the impact on their property prices. Joanne Eley noted that he needed to take this up with MKC, it being the responsible body. Brian claimed that when he’d spoken with MKC, it’d put the ball back in OTC’s court. Jeremy Rawlings noted this was not an agenda item, could not be discussed in this meeting, and reiterated that MKC was the body responsible. Brian walked out of the Council Chamber.

    Cemetery rules
    This item was brought forward due to the significant number of the public attending to hear it. It was a tense, awkward part of the meeting. Jeremy Rawlings opened the discussion, noting the strength of feeling and explaining that OTC had two broad choices – to implement the rules as they were or to change them. He’d recently visited three other cemeteries in the Milton Keynes area and seen no evidence of similar decorations. Des Eley drew Councillors’ attention to a notice on the cemetery gate which stated it was an offence to remove anything from the site, and he noted there appeared to be a change in how the public viewed grieving, so maybe a review of the rules might be appropriate. Peter Geary suggested to Jeremy that this was not the right forum for such sensitive discussions – a smaller, less time constrained meeting would be more appropriate. Jeremy agreed, Colin Rodden noting that he’d made a similar suggestion previously but seen it rejected. Colin explained that the individuals concerned had talked with him about the issue, that it was very raw and perhaps personalised. Tony Evans spoke in support of the Deputy Town Clerk – she had correctly pointed out the rules as they currently exist, he said. The members of the public who’d spoken on this topic appeared a little happier that their concerns would be listened to, and agreed to a subsequent private meeting with a smaller set of Councillors.

    Rugby Club purchase

    unknown
    Olney Town Football Club


    Fireworks on the Goosey
    Joe Wheeler, organiser of last year’s display on the Goosey had contacted Brian Reynolds, the farmer working that land, to ask his permission to hold the display again. Brian refused the request then contacted the Council. After a brief discussion, Councillors agreed to write to both parties refusing permission for any fireworks display on the Goosey.

    Aspreys parking permits
    Residents of 1-12 Aspreys, the two cul-de-sacs to the Northern end of that road, have applied to MKC to implement a residents only parking scheme for their cul-de-sacs, optionally plus the nearby Flaxlands Row. As per procedure, MKC will start an informal consultation with nearby residents and, provided at least 50% respond with 70% or more expressing support, they will implement it. MKC had asked OTC for its view, so it was discussed. Joanne Eley was concerned about how such a scheme would be enforced, and Deirdre Bethune suggested OTC not support the application. Colin Rodden, agreeing, felt that Olney residents instead needed to work as a community – people had to park somewhere. It went to a vote, Councillors voting by majority to object to the scheme.

    Amazing Grace 250
    Paul Collins reported that, on 1st January 2023, it will be 250 years since the hymn Amazing Grace was written. Starting this year, a mix of organisations, businesses and residents had come together to explore how to raise the profile of Olney’s unique international heritage story as ‘The home of Amazing Grace’. He asked for, and was given, the Council’s support for this initiative.

    Standing Orders
    As the Council inches towards creating Standing Orders it can approve, Des Eley introduced the latest round of discussions. First, he noted that the previous meeting had agreed that a set of clauses from the Orders be reviewed at this meeting. While their wording was from the ‘model’ clauses, he asked if any background information was available so a considered review could take place. There wasn’t, and Jane Brushwood asked if this review could be left until a new Town Clerk had been appointed, as she was unable to devote much time to it until then. Des replied that would be ok if Council agreed to the delay. Jeremy Rawlings said this discussion should be deferred until this meeting’s Confidential Items slot, during which they’d also be discussing the new Town Clerk’s recruitment. Second, he referred to various other clauses concerning access to staff records. During the 14th January meeting held to discuss Standing Orders, these had proved controversial and were referred to MKC for feedback. Its report concluded that their original proposed wording was correct and, finally, these clauses were agreed. That being so, it appears that next month OTC can attempt to sign off the resulting Standing Orders – something of an important moment, pending since its annual meeting of May 2018

    Works
    The Council is compiling the information required for it to approach EON in connection with the quality of its work installing the electrical points on the Market Place. As reported before, OTC paid for the resurfacing of the path leading from the toilet block, past the tennis courts to the next field South, the work having been completed some months ago. Des Eley noted that plans for the path had included a drainage channel down its middle, yet this had not been installed. Tony Evans replied that, as work started on site, it became obvious it would be better not to fit this channel, replacing it with kerbing on one side to guide water to drain. This kerbing accounted for the £700 increase in cost, he said. The work had been completed and approved – OTC had not overpaid for the work. Des said he’d look further at the detail, then raise the issue again if required. Colin Rodden again raised the issue of broken play equipment remaining unrepaired, citing various basketball hoops and the zip wire on Johnson’s Field. It would be great to get these fixed for young people to use over the Summer, he said. Jane noted that OTC had three replacement boards for the hoops but no time to install them, and that the rest of the equipment was MKC’s responsibility. Peter Geary suggested OTC write to Stuart Proffitt at MKC requesting the remedial work be done. Peter Geary noted the equipment required to improve the crossing adjacent to One Stop should have been installed by the end of June. It would take something over one day, with temporary traffic lights required.

    Schedule of payments
    Towards the end of each full OTC meeting, Councillors review the schedule of payments – a list of the Council’s outgoings during the previous month. Often passing through unchallenged, more recently the detail of individual payments has been requested. This month, Joanne Eley asked if the £4,320 payment to MKC concerning a grievance was the end of the matter: Were there any outstanding Human Resources costs? Jeremy replied there were none as far as he knew, although there were related matters to discuss. A payment of £630 to the Tennis Club was also questioned, Tony explaining it was for the Club performing certain maintenance tasks.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs

    Next Meeting - 1st July The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 1st July in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    The Annual Town Meeting

    Annual Town Meeting - Nothing appearing yet!



    Olney Council report in August for the July 2019 Council Meeting

    Public Participation
    Catherine Rose Catherine Rose spoke first in this slot on the subject of OTC considering whether to declare a Climate Emergency. She started by placing a bowl of flowers on the Council table as a symbol of the beauty of Olney and the surrounding area. Feeling that Olney was somewhat cocooned and ‘climate privileged’ she thought it beholden on the town to make climate-friendly changes. She knew that people wanted to make these changes, but didn’t know how – Olney needed a plan to guide families, schools, community organisations, etc. She asked Olney Town Council (OTC) to commit to two or three headline activities, for example reducing waste and planting trees. Finishing with a plea to ‘listen to our children’, she asked OTC to act. Jane Varley Jane Varley spoke next, representing Extinction Rebellion. Continuing with Catherine’s theme, she felt OTC had a moral duty to lead in this area – that Olney as a community had the power to make change happen. Like Catherine, she felt the next step was to plan. She also had a set of steps OTC could follow if, like Milton Keynes Council (MKC), it did choose to declare a climate emergency. Sarah Williams Last to speak was Sarah Williams. Continuing in a similar vein, she noted that individuals look to local government to facilitate change, but that there were huge contradictions between current policy and climate change. Declaring a climate emergency would give the Council a framework for change. While the UK has committed to ‘net zero’ emissions by 2050, she felt we didn’t have 30 years to wait – people needed to act quickly.

    Approving the minutes
    A few items from the previous meeting’s minutes caused discussion. Desmond Eley explained he had not researched the Rugby Club purchase item, but merely stated that in order to proceed with the sale OTC should engage a solicitor. Colin Rodden was concerned about the brevity of the minutes, Jeremy Rawlings explaining that things should ‘get back on track’ in September, presumably when the Town Clerk post is filled making the office once again fully staffed. Joanne Eley had GDPR concerns about members of the Public being mentioned in the minutes. Jeremy explained that he understood her concerns but did not agree with them. Joanne Eley requested he take advice on this topic.

    Climate Emergency
    Steve Clark generally appeared in favour of declaring the Emergency, noting that other Councils had done so recently, and citing the hole in the ozone layer and associated reduction of Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) as an example of what could be achieved if people worked together. Deirdre Bethune felt OTC should look at what it could start to do, for example litter picking and installing water stations to discourage the use of single use plastic bottles. Paul Collins, first explaining that he respected the integrity and sincerity of the speakers, noted that the world’s greatest polluters are China, India and the USA, the UK being responsible for 1% of emissions globally. While the argument was to lead by example, he felt it naive to assume others would respond in kind. This was gesture politics, he said. Other Councillors spoke in favour of declaring, Colin Rodden noting that the required change would cut across many things OTC does, such as leisure, managing its land estate and making purchasing decisions. Peter Geary noted that MKC was delivering a Climate Emergency plan, perhaps around the end of the year, which OTC would need to review and mesh with. The Council is setting up a small working group to report back to full Council with recommendations of what should be done.

    Annual accounts
    Paul Collins reported that the Council’s accounts have passed their annual audit, though he was surprised the auditor didn’t comment on its low level of general reserves.

    VE Day 75
    Celebrations for the 75th anniversary of VE Day will be held on 8th – 19th May 2020, the first of those days being the shifted early May bank holiday. OTC supports this and will track the arrangements as more information becomes available so it can assist as required.

    MUGA marking
    The MUGA will shortly be marked out with new lines for netball, five a side football and basketball.

    Emergency Plan
    This item was to discuss OTC developing an Emergency Plan, a topic which was discussed a number of years ago but never came to fruition. Peter Geary explained that the Plan would be designed to apply in the event of local emergencies such as gas leaks or fires, rather than large scale ones such as plane crashes. It would, for example, note an emergency centre and a list of its key holders to allow access should the need arise. Jeremy Rawlings will open discussions with MKC, which had offered help if OTC didn’t already have a plan.

    Wildleaf
    Jeremy Rawlings noted that Wildleaf has started selling tea, coffee and sandwiches from a shed behind the Rugby Club previously used as a store. Jane Brushwood explained that the business owner had visited the OTC office a few days before to tell the Council he was doing this. She had asked if he’d obtained planning permission, but he didn’t appear to know whether it was needed. The Council agreed to inform MKC of the situation, explaining to Wildleaf its concern that planning permission may be required.

    Amazing Grace pilgrimage walk
    The 240th anniversary of the publication of Amazing Grace in the Olney Hymns is being celebrated on Sunday 15th September, with a walk from Central Milton Keynes to Emberton Country Park, taking in various Churches en route.  Walking distances of 11, seven and five miles are planned and, if you’d like to be involved as a walker, marshal or musician, surf to www.amazingpilgrimage.co.uk for more information.

    Cemetery rules
    Following on from the public participation and subsequent discussion in last month’s meeting, this was more of an update on progress. The Recreations and Services Committee had reviewed the rules and recommended the removal of the sentence “No artificial wreaths, flowers, crosses or articles of a similar nature will be allowed to be placed on any grave.” Councillors voted unanimously to accept its recommendation. Jeremy Rawlings noted that he’s continuing attempts to organise meetings with each of the families who’d spoken at the previous meeting.

    Standing Orders
    The recently adopted Standing Orders will be uploaded to the Council website.

    Litter
    As well as litter in the area near the Rugby Club being discussed, Graham Harrison noted that the bin adjacent to Timpson’s Row was too small. Colin Rodden, frustrated, felt the real issue was that people should take their litter home.

    Funding
    Milton Keynes Council has announced the availability of a £100,000 Supplementary Fund 2019-20, for which it was inviting applications. The fund had come into being due to problems with the way the Community Infrastructure Fund 2019-20 had been communicated with Parish Councils. The time remaining to apply being surprisingly short, Councillors decided to apply for monies to install water stations.

    Lambs
    Colin Rodden noted he’d recently seen two lambs in the river near the Goosey, with someone trying to fish them out. Having previously mentioned the poor condition of the field fences there, he again raised the need to contact the tenant farmer to request they be fixed. Peter Geary pointed out that lambs tend not to fall into rivers, being good at navigating slopes, but are more likely to be chased into them by dogs. Colin felt it more an issue of good animal husbandry. The Council will write to the tenant to request the fencing be repaired.

    Bits’n’bobs
    Steve Clark reported that changes to the payment system to enter Emberton Park were being discussed, including the provision of a chip and pin terminal on the entry barrier, and a reduced fee to visit only the cafe. Desmond Eley noted there was an ongoing debate between those wanting to make the Park more commercial and those wanting it to function as a nature reserve as originally intended. Desmond Eley asked if this month’s £950 spend on diesel fuel was typical for a Summer month, Tony Evans replying that when the diesel tank needs filling, it gets filled up. Quotes have been obtained to improve the security of the tractor shed, one of which has now been accepted. Colin Rodden noted that the £2,000 of MKC community funding applied for in connection with Oakdown Crescent had now been awarded, matched funding raising the total to £4,000. Nigel Birrell had written to OTC to thank it for allowing him to perform his recent 24-hour vigil on the Market Place. Separately, the Armed Forces Day lunch at the Carlton House Club was successful and much enjoyed by those who attended.

    Declarations of interest part one
    Joanne Eley spoke briefly on the subject of her and Desmond Eley’s declarations of interest in December’s full Council meeting where, as reported, Jeremy Rawlings had advised they each declare an additional interest, which they chose not to do. For reference, these interests were in an agenda item to ‘approve costs of mediation process’ (Desmond), and in one to ‘consider recommendation from HR Committee regarding Job Evaluations’ (Joanne). Joanne explained that after seven months, her legal advice was that the declarations her and Desmond had made were perfectly correct. Jeremy and Liam Costello, then Town Clerk, had been given incorrect advice, having sought it from the wrong person at MKC. Mentioning a significantly longer time period of two years, she noted that nothing had been found other than her having full personal and professional integrity. Jeremy apologised, and Joanne said she wished to declare an end to the matter.

    Declarations of interest part two
    Desmond Eley spoke about the same declarations of interest raised earlier by Joanne. He noted that OTC’s Proper Officer at the time, ex-Town Clerk Liam Costello, had complained to the unitary authority (MKC) that Joanne and Desmond had breached the code of conduct. But they had not. Desmond stressed that he and Joanne had been investigated for two years and stated that he wanted a proper apology from the Council in writing. Jeremy Rawlings said he’d be happy to arrange that and would make sure it happened.

    Next Meeting - 2nd September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    Olney Council report for August 2019

    There is not normally a Council Meeting in August:

    August Meeting
    There is not normally a meeting of Olney Town Council (OTC) for the month of August. However, this year a meeting was convened at short notice and The Phonebox was unable to send a reporter. Therefore, the only records of the meeting are contained in the official minutes which are available on the OTC website but summarised below. Tony Evans presented a comprehensive report on the progress of legal papers concerning the lease of the former football club building to Body Force, where it was noted that OTC have paid £4000 for the surrender document for the Football Club and also that Body Force have engaged their own solicitors. Olney came home second in the Buckinghamshire Best Kept Village Competition with 90 points, losing out to Winslow with 93 points. Most of the meeting appears to have been to discuss HR issues, from which the public and press would have been excluded. 

    August Meeting
    Minutes for the August meeting cannot be found at the Council at the moment!



    Olney Council report for September 2019

    Public Participation
    Catherine Rose Following on from last month, Catherine Rose once again spoke in support of OTC declaring a Climate Emergency. Catherine said that she appreciated living in a beautiful town and surrounding countryside and knew that many people were concerned about the environment, both at home and in a broader sense. She said there was already great work being done in Olney, particularly Barnfield where the meadow is being regenerated, and the Climate Emergency Plan (CEP) working party originated at last month’s meeting had met. She quoted recent examples in the news such as the decline of the Great Barrier Reef, the hurricane in the Bahamas and the fire in the Amazon – the ‘lungs of the world’. Our own forests were cut down in the Industrial Revolution and ‘we’ have been polluting for 250 years and are still in the top 15 polluters worldwide. Blaming China, India and South America for all the pollution that is happening now simply will not wash, and much of the pollution in the continents is being generated for us as consumers. It was not necessary to make massive changes to make a massive difference, she said, and finance is available for various schemes which the council could explore. She said she was aware that some people, even on the council, see environment campaigners as ‘swivel-eyed disaster-mongers’, but they like to think of themselves as ‘clear-eyed disaster preventers’ and prevention is better than a cure. Sarah Michalik Next to speak was Sarah Michalik on the same subject. In an impassioned speech, Sarah explained that last year she decided to do more to fight climate change in our town. Since 1970 wildlife extinction rates were at a level never seen before, with climate change affecting one-third of our UK species. As a parent to two young children, she said she needed to be able to look them in the eye and say she did everything she could to secure their safe future. She started the Olney sustainable futures Facebook page that now has approaching 300 members who share ideas about reducing the impact on the planet. She runs the Eco-Schools programme at the infant school to teach the next generation, but we need to act now she said. By declaring a climate emergency we are saying ‘it matters’ and the dozens of willing volunteers (some of whom were present) want to work with the council and put Olney on the map and secure its future. Sarah finished by saying, let’s do something and get everyone part of the conversation to achieve carbon neutrality inline with UK targets by 2030. There was considerable applause from the audience and some council members around the table.

    Climate Emergency
    Chris Tennant Chris Tennant reported back on the first meeting of the CEP working party to discuss the way forward and presented a recommendation that OTC declares a Climate Emergency, as 200 local councils around the UK already have, covering 64% of the population. It will raise the profile of the issue and provide leverage in obtaining the extra support that OTC needs to achieve the necessary reductions to meet the plan. Milton Keynes Council (MKC) has published its own sustainability strategy running to 2030, many of the elements relevant to what OTC can do to become carbon neutral by then by reducing carbon emissions, increase energy security and improving air quality. OTC could look at how it runs its own estates such as heating and insulating buildings, more use of solar energy and moving from diesel to electric vehicles. Biodiversity could be enhanced across the estate and landowners could be encouraged to do the same. Green events could be run or supported in collaboration with the schools and businesses to encourage them to reduce their own energy costs and carbon emissions. The CEP can be developed to enable the wider community to become more resilient in the face of extreme weather conditions. There was real enthusiasm in the working group, he said, and he implored the council to support the proposal. Steve Clark Steve Clark supported the proposal and noted that OTC already supported energy efficiency and conservation by using low energy lighting and the work that is done at Barnfield with trees and wildflowers. It was important to note the contribution that young people are making all over the country, he said. Paul Collins Next to speak was Paul Collins, reading a prepared statement. A lot of the items being proposed were essentially good housekeeping, he said. He did, however, object to the term ‘climate emergency’ because he did not believe there is one. The earth’s climate has always varied over time and to have a true appreciation of climate you either need to be a geologist or a historian. Eco-guilt is a first-world luxury and is the new religion for urban populations who have lost faith in Christianity. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report is their bible and Al Gore their prophet. Man’s contribution to the thing we now call climate change was, and probably always will be, quite negligible. Terrifying because you cannot help but be appalled at how much money has been wasted and how much unnecessary legislation drafted because the problem does not actually exist. There is now a powerful and very extensive body of vested interests, governments that intend to use global warming as an excuse for greater taxation, regulation and protectionism plus energy companies and investors who stand to make a fortune from scams like carbon trading. Charitable bodies like Greenpeace depend for their funding on public anxiety, and environmental correspondents constantly need to talk up the threat to justify their own jobs. Finally, said Paul, he’d like to say a bit about consensus. If you’d asked any scientist or doctor 30 years ago where stomach ulcers came from, they would all have given the same answer: Obviously, it comes from acid brought on by too much stress. All of them apart from two scientists who were pilloried for their crazy, wacko theory that it was caused by bacteria. In 2005 they won the Noble prize – the consensus was wrong. Jo Eley Jo Eley asked what research into the costs and targets for OTC council taxpayers were likely to be, even if it only extended to a single electric tractor. Consensus would need to be obtained from them because there was a cost involved, and she would prefer it to be called sustainability, not climate emergency. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings said money would be available from grants. Chris Tennant replied that at the moment, the ‘nitty-gritty’ detail was not available, and the proposal related to setting policy objective. The IPCC had stated that there was less than 12 years to act to avoid the worse impacts and that, despite what Paul Collins had said, constituted an emergency. Responding to Paul’s statement, Steve Clark said that the effect of carbon emission had been measured over millennia through rock and wood samples and the science behind those measures was absolutely proven and there is no doubt that climate changes have been accentuated by mankind’s activities. He accepted that there has always been climate change, but whereas it was in the range of one or two degrees over thousands of years, those changes were now happening in a generation.  Desmond Eley Desmond Eley noted that MKC had declared Climate Emergency and therefore OTC had no choice but to follow their policies as part of the unitary authority. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that he was on the working group for the MKC sustainability strategy which was due to be adopted in March 2020. Much of its work concerned the environmental impact of cows, he noted. The proposal for OTC to declare a Climate Emergency was passed by a vote of 6 to 2 with several abstentions. Desmond Eley stated that the reason for his objection was insufficient information and felt that a document should have been available to support a decision of such magnitude. 

    Safety of bathing at Olney Riverside
    A request has been received from a group called ‘Slow Swimming’ wishing to hold a ‘mass participation social swim’ in the river next year and seeking to use the recreation ground for registration. Also, a letter had been received from a member of the public, drawing attention to a recent article in The Times concerning the hazards involved in wild water swimming in countryside rivers.  It stated that no river in the UK could be considered safe for bathing due to inadequate testing in compliance with ecological standards. 86% of those that were tested fell short of the minimum threshold for healthy waterways, an increase from 75% ten years ago. The letter suggested that OTC might be liable for any death or illness caused by swimming in the river by holding and actively promoting the raft race, although the event is fact organised by The Olney Group, not OTC. 
    Jeremy Rawlings Jeremy Rawlings said that his view was that the safety of bathing in the river was down to the individual as he personally swam there and has done so for many years.  Steve Clark Steve Clark said he had no problems with organised groups or competent adults swimming in the river, but the newspaper article was complete nonsense and should be taken with a pinch of salt.  Sally Pezaro Sally Pezaro said she wasn’t comfortable with the existing sign that says swimming is at ‘own risk’ and would prefer the council to officially advise against swimming but noted that it could not be policed.  Peter Geary Peter Geary said the council do have a responsibility as they own the land and need to follow due process. He suggested investigating the MKC Parks Trust policy to ensure that OTC can be seen to have considered the risks. He said that the river in Olney was the cleanest it had been for 150 years, and in the past the sewer from Emberton used to discharge directly into it, although he noted that with the amount of rats that were currently to be seen around the bathing steps he personally wouldn’t want to swim there.  Chris Tennant Chris Tennant said that he knew of people that had been injured by broken glass at the bathing steps and wondered if it might not be time to consider a swimming pool in the town, possibly to the rear of the new Sainsbury’s.  Paul Collins Paul Collins said that while a pool might not be expensive to build it would certainly be expensive to maintain and besides which a good swimming facility existed nearby in Newport Pagnell. 

    Emberton Park
    Steve Clark said that the Emberton Park User Liaison Group was meeting regularly once again and was making good progress. Jeremy Rawlings noted that there had been a lot of discussion on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook group, mainly about litter. Steve agreed, saying that it would be good to prevent the large groups that descend on the park unannounced, but Emberton was one of the only parks in the area where this was possible. Jeremy noted that MKC Parks Trust have a rule that large groups must make a booking. Changes had been considered to provide more automation for admissions but were proving very expensive. Peter Geary said the park was ‘work in progress’ and the ward councillors had met with MKC and requested a 5-10 year strategy on how they intended to manage it because hundreds of thousands of pounds of spending is required. 

    Grant for school PHSE programme
    A teacher at Olney Middle School had submitted a request for a grant towards a resource pack for a PHSE (Personal, Social and Health Education) programme called Jigsaw PHSE. The government has mandated that RSE (Relationship and Sex Education) and Heath Education are now compulsory for all schools but presumably not made any additional funding available. The letter noted that young people are increasingly putting themselves or finding themselves in vulnerable positions and it is important that schools are in a position to prepare them with the skills and resilience to deal with real-life situations and to stay safe. The resources would be utilised by both the Olney Infant Academy and Middle School, and the total cost would be £1,925.
    Desmond Eley noted that there was no particular budget for this, although Jeremy Rawlings stated that OTC has a fund (formerly known as the Sidney Dix Fund) which could be used. Jo Eley questioned what the requested resources would actually look like, and Jeremy referred her to the link in the email hwww.jigsawpshe.com/ which describe the programme in some detail. Each school has already raised £500, so the requested grant is for the balance. Des Eley pointed out that two-thirds of the existing Section 106 allocation already goes to schools so questioned why the additional grant was necessary.  Chris Tennant said that section 106 could only be used for capital projects so was not appropriate. Paul Collins replied that the original request had been for the full amount and it was only when the council’s ‘matched funding’ policy had been pointed out that the schools had ‘found’ £1000 between them. The government had just announced a massive increase in spending on schools, he said. Des Eley said he did not think the council had sufficient information to make a decision so suggested that a representative be asked to give a brief presentation at a future meeting, which most members seemed to agree with.  Colin Rodden thought it unfortunate that the council was spending so much time discussing a grant of £925 when it had readily given out larger sums to other bodies in the past.

    Odds and Sods
    Peter Geary reported that the surface of the newly laid path between Olney and Weston Underwood is already ‘failing’ because the preparation of the sub-layer was poor. It is covered by a two-year warranty and will be referred back to the contractors. Later in the meeting, he observed that the hedges were currently neatly cut back (presumably to enable the resurfacing work), but it was unlikely that MKC would maintain it so suggested that OTC obtain funding from MKC and do it themselves a couple of times a year. The tenant farmer on the Goosey has replaced 120 fence posts, but Peter Geary thought there is still some work to be done and proposed a meeting with him and group of councillors to decide who would be responsible for any additional work.
    Jo Eley reported back from the recent Parish Forum where the PCSOs had noted that the signs banning the consumption of alcohol in public spaces appear to have fallen down. While not totally preventing the consumption of alcohol, it meant that the PCSOs cannot react to drink-related antisocial behaviour or confiscate alcohol from under-aged drinkers. A letter had been received from The Olney Group (TOG) requesting permission to hold the annual fireworks display on Sunday, November 3rd, which was granted.

    Councillor Tony Evans
    Jeremy Rawlings announced that Tony Evans had resigned from the council and they had lost a valued and well-respected member. He expressed his sincere thanks for all his work over more than 40 years for the council.

    Next meeting - 7th October The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th October in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    November 2019 edition (October Meeting)

    Deputy Town Clerk
    Before the meeting commenced Mayor Jeremy Rawlings welcomed the recently appointed Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy, congratulating her on her appointment and thanking the interview team.

    Public Participation
    As reported last month, a teacher at Olney Middle School had submitted a request to Olney Town Council (OTC) for a grant towards a resource pack for a PHSE (Personal, Social and Health Education) programme called Jigsaw PHSE. Members did not think the council had sufficient information to make a decision on financial assistance so suggested that a representative be asked to give a brief presentation at a future meeting. This month Lucy Coleman, a teacher at Olney Middle School, was present to provide that information. Lucy began by saying that children and young people’s mental health is on the decline due to pressure such as social media. There has been a huge drop in funding for outside agencies to support schools and parents/carers with children’s emotional well-being. Previously the schools could direct parents to agencies, but these just don’t exist anymore. Of the remaining counselling services many are now not able to take on young people unless they are in extreme need – often a suicide risk. The school learning mentors are overrun with children in extreme need and have no time to support those with lesser needs. This is often left to teachers who are already overrun trying to meet educational needs but are expected to be experts in every field. She finished off by saying that schools were doing their best to create happy, secure, respectful and resilient children who will be an asset to the wider community. 
    Next to speak was Lindsay Heath on the subject of the Thursday Market. She said she was concerned that if people don’t use it, they will lose it. It gets no publicity, she said, and it needs to be advertised widely as happens with the Sunday Farmers Market. It is a high-quality market with amazing fresh local produce and the latest addition is a stall for sharpening knives and other implements. She appealed for the council’s help in promoting the market, particularly as Sainsburys will soon be opening. Jeremy Rawlings said that OTC had been involved in a number of promotion initiatives over the years, the most recent being an invitation to the market traders to promote their wares on the Olney Notice Board which had received a zero response.
    The next speaker was Kevin McPartland who noted that OTC had recently declared a Climate Emergency, part of which pledges to improve the air quality in the town. Why after 30 years of discusses has the issue of a bypass not been addressed, he asked. With 350 new homes plus a new Sainsburys on the horizon, traffic will increase, and pollution will get worse. For the past 15 years Milton Keynes Council have issued air quality reports but no action has taken place on the findings. In 2009 the transport research laboratory issued a report which proposed remedial action to reduce HGV traffic in Olney, but 10 years on no action has been taken. In 2005 and 2017 the local plan identified it as an issue but still no action. He asked the council to look at the issue and pursue the provision of a bypass. Jeremy Rawlings responded that both proposed bypass routes are shown as reserved in the local plan but the main issue is funding.
    Last to speak was Lynda Batty on the subject of the Youth Centre. She said that two years ago she had attended an OTC meeting to ask what was happening with the building and why had a group of regular users not been regularly invoiced. Two years later they were still waiting to be invoiced for May 2019 onwards. Surely the council need the money because the building requires a substantial amount of repair. At the original meeting she had been told that there was a problem with the Community Asset Transfer (CAT) scheme to OTC. As far as she was aware no further information was available. The building is ideal for use by older members and youth of the community and is sadly under used. Collecting fees would help with the upkeep and enable the employment of an admin person to manage the hire, she said. Jeremy Rawlings said that the building was managed on behalf of MKC by an independent committee of four people, including himself. This group act as tenants and are responsible for all repairs to the building but it was difficult to find new volunteers. The existing committee were on the verge of giving up and handing it back to MKC, he said. In that case MKC will simply close the building, he said. He will be posting information on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook group in due course.

    Grant application for school PHSE programme
    Following Lucy Coleman’s presentation, a discussion took place about the need for the grant. Des Eley asked why it was necessary and Jeremy Rawlings, declaring an interest as a school governor, said the rhetoric coming from central government about school funding increasing year on year is a ‘tissue of lies’ because he sees the figures for funding and there is no doubt that it is actually declining. Peter Geary proposed that a grant of £925 be made, which was agreed. Lucy will provide feedback to the council at a future meeting.

    Co-option of new member
    Following the resignation of Tony Evans, a vacancy exists on the council. One person had put themselves forward for co-option but was not present at the meeting. It was decided to hold this over to the next meeting.

    Emergency/ Resilience Plan
    Clerk Andrea Vincent presented a plan based on a template produced by MKC for situations where an emergency arises (actual or potential) and the emergency services are unable to provide the normal swift assistance, due to weather conditions of or priorities elsewhere. Under those circumstances a member of the council might be called upon to arrange for emergency reception centres to be opened and liaise with other agencies and community groups. It was agreed to adopt the plan.

    Climate Emergency
    The development group has met since the last OTC meeting but Chris Tennant was not present so no report had been submitted.

    Land to the rear of the Bowling Club
    A landlock strip of land exists between the building formally occupied by Olney Town Football Club and the Bowling Club which is not used and has become overgrown. It is currently owned by OTC and is part of that land that is due to be leased to Body Force, although they are not intending to use it. The Bowling Club have approached OTC with a view to buying or leasing the land to provide a  viewing and seating area. Des Eley explained that it is not possible to sell the land as it is part of the recreation ground but it is currently unused and polluted by rodents. It was agreed to lease the land to the Bowling Club for a ‘peppercorn rent’, with all associated costs being born by them and subject to access being allowed to the rear of the building occupied by Body Force and Olney Town Colts Football Club (OTCFC).

    Councillor Tony Evans
    Jeremy Rawlings announced that Tony Evans had resigned from the council and they had lost a valued and well-respected member. He expressed his sincere thanks for all his work over more than 40 years for the council.
    Next Meeting - November* The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday (November*) in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate. We do apologies for a cut and past mix up. To keep a true record on what went into the Phonebox Magazine we have left this in here. But there is a correction in next month's magazine.



    Olney Council report for November 2019

    Omission from last month's report
    Due to error on the part of your reporter the following items were missed from last month’s report and are now included here for completeness: Olney Town Colts Football Club has recently suffered a good deal of vandalism to its premises and facilities. A letter has been received requesting permission to install CCTV covering the clubhouse, stand and dug-out. It was noted that The Rugby Club already have CCTV covering the Olney Town Council (OTC) owned car park at the front of their clubhouse. While sympathetic to the request a number of members had concerns about the coverage of the cameras and who would view the footage, particularly around the changing rooms where minors would be present, and there were safeguarding obligations to consider. Jeremy Rawlings said it would also be important to consult Caveman Conditioning, who use the grassed area in front of the building for classes. It was agreed to hold a meeting of all stakeholder users the area, along with a security expert who can provide advice on CCTV covering such sensitive areas. The electricity supply to the Market Place has still not been completed by EON to a satisfactory standard, the making good around the control box has not been completed, and there is some doubt as to whether it has been commissioned correctly. Desmond Eley is investigating and will report back.  Many of the trees in the High Street have now been pollarded by Milton Keynes Council (MKC), as requested by OTC.

    unknown

    One of the pollarded trees on Olney High Street

    Public Participation for the November Meeting
    First to speak was Chris Roberts on behalf of the Olney Branch of The Royal British Legion. Chris thanked the members of the council for their continued support of the Remembrance Day parade and requested that two councillors attend to read out the names of the Olney men who died in WW1 and WW2. It was agreed that Joanne Eley and Steve Clark would perform that duty. Next to speak was Patricia Gadsby. Patricia explained that she is the Activities Co-ordinator for Broomfield Residential Care Home, which care for 40 residents and specialises in dementia care. There is currently a major refurbishment taking place, and Patricia said she is trying to create awareness and stronger links with the community, which has attendance by a group of Pre-school children to perform song and dance and talk to the residents, which has two-way benefits. Members of The Baptist Church have also performed there, and it is hoped that residents will be able to participate in the Amazing Grace 250th anniversary celebrations. Patricia said the councillors, either collectively or individually, would be most welcome to get involved with activities. She said that there would be a grand opening of the refurbished premises in January and all councillors and the local MP (whoever that might be) would be invited to attend. Mercury interjected to say that his old mate David Pibworth would no doubt be delighted to attend should the voters of the Milton Keynes North constituency return a Monster Raving Loony Party MP at the forthcoming general election!

    OTC Code of Conduct
    Paul Cummins, Deputy Monitoring Officer MKC, was present to give a presentation on the Code of Conduct which has been adopted by OTC. Also present was Monitoring Officer Sharon Bridglalsingh. Paul did not state the purpose of the presentation since OTC adopted the code in 2012, but Mercury assumes it was a timely reminder to all members of the ethical standards required of them. The code was introduced in order to comply with the Localism Act of 2011 and is intended to be ‘light-touch’ compared with the more formal standards regime of the predecessor Local Government act of 2000. The code states that councillors, along with everyone else in public office, should uphold the principles of accountability, honesty, integrity, objectivity, selflessness, openness and leadership known as the Nolan Principles. The council must maintain a Register of Interest for all members which includes Disclosable Pecuniary (financial) Interests (DPI) applying to councillors and their spouses or partners. If any member becomes aware of a DPI during a meeting that is not already on the register, they must declare it at the meeting and register it within 28 days. Any gift or hospitality over £100 in value must be declared, including a series of lesser value gifts totally more than £100. The full Code of Conduct can be viewed on the council website https://www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk/  Kevin Viney asked how many investigations into breaches of the code had taken place in 2019 across all parish councils. Paul replied that four alleged breaches were currently being investigated at a cost to Council Tax payers of approximately £30K.

    Co-option of new member
    Following the resignation of Tony Evans, a vacancy exists on the council. Debbie Whitworth was the only candidate to put her name forward and was present to address the council. Debbie explained that she had lived in Olney for 28 years, and her three sons had all attended local schools and had played for Olney Town Football Club. Since being diagnosed with MS six years ago, Debbie said she had become very aware of the daily obstacles affecting the elderly and disabled in the town, bad parking being a particular issue of concern. As there were no other candidates, it was not necessary to hold the usual secret ballot and Debbie was elected unopposed and welcomed to the council by Mayor Jeremy Rawlings.

    Supplementary Fund application
    Parish councils are permitted to apply for funding for projects which support MKC Themes and demonstrate public benefit. The Limit on the total value of bids is £5,000 (£10K project value as parishes are expected to match any grant by 50%). Each Parish or Town Council may submit a maximum of three applications. OTC has applied for and been given two grants – one for fencing around the children’s play area on the recreation ground and the other for drinking fountains in the town, for which the council are looking at designs.

    McCarthy and Stone development proposal
    Angle Properties and McCarthy & Stone have submitted a detailed planning application for 48 retirement flats and ten houses on land to the rear of the new Sainsbury’s store. The MKC Planning Officers have recommended acceptance of the plans which were due to be presented to the MKC Development Control Committee (DCC) two days later. Chris Tennant explained OTC objections to the plans, being:

    • The land is earmarked for retail use in the Neighbourhood Plan.
    • Insufficient evidence has been submitted to prove that an attempt has been made to find a retail customer for the site.
    • The site is unsuitable for retirement housing, due to its location.
    Chris said as Chair of the Olney Development Group he would be speaking at the meeting, along with Ward Councillors Peter Geary and David Hoskings. Colin Rodden said he understood that Sainsbury’s had signed a non-competition clause in the agreement with Angle to ensure that a similar retail operation would not be permitted on the site. Chris responded that the marketing report submitted by agents BNP Paribas confirmed this. Deirdre Bethune wondered if this excluded a petrol station and Chris replied that there had been enquiries of this nature, but since petrol stations usually include a convenience grocery section this would be considered competition to Sainsbury’s. Steve Clark said that OTC had only recently discovered that the non-competition clause existed, and Angle had met with them several times and claimed that there had been no interest from other retailers so believed that there had been deliberate deception on their part. Update: At the meeting on 7th November, MKC DCC decided not to accept the MK Officer recommendation and refuse the application due to its conflict with the Olney Neighbourhood Plan. The applicant was given advice by Councillors that where communities have come together to produce a Neighbourhood Plan, planning decisions will be made in accordance with the Neighbourhood Plan and Plan:MK. It is not known at this stage if there will be an appeal.

    Astro-turf pitch
    Chris Tennant said consideration was being given to the provision of a full-size 3G Astro-turf pitch locally. Some Section 106 money is available, and MKC and the Football Foundation would provide additional funding. The FA has identified that there a number of locations in MK that are lacking such facilities and are committed to providing 1000 pitches nationally. As chair of the Olney Development Group, he had recently met with the FA, representatives of local sports clubs and Ousedale School with a view to providing a pitch at the Ousedale Olney campus. It would be managed by the school with a community use agreement out of core school time, he said. Chris said the cost would be in the region of £750K, which caused some consternation amongst members. Dierdre Bethune was sceptical of the community use suggestion, pointing out that OTC had agreed to release a large part of the council-owned Barnfield for creation of the school playing field on condition that it would be available for community use and that agreement had not been honoured by the school. She also pointed out the irony of a council that had recently declared a climate emergency proposing to lay down plastic grass. Peter Geary said that finding capital funding to provide such facilities was often not a problem, but the council should bear in mind that the life-span is usually in the order of 10 years, after which a six-figure sum would be required to replace the surface otherwise it would have to close on safety grounds. It was important that a ‘sink fund’ was set up right at the start to cover this, he said. This meant that the fees for using it would have to be quite steep in order to build up this fund.

    Climate Emergency
    Chris Tennant reported that Climate Change Group had held their third meeting where they had discussed how they could work with local organisations. A workshop will be held in January, focusing primarily on food issues such as food waste, sourcing food locally, and what the council can do in terms of procurement of goods and services. Consideration has been given to reducing grass cutting in order to reduce fuel costs and enhance wildlife habitats and planting additional trees.

    Odds and Sods
    The Local Authority Publishing Co Ltd (a private company) have approached OTC concerning an update of the Town Guide. This is at no cost to the council as the revenue comes from advertising. It was noted that previous editions had contained a number of errors so the council will proofread before publishing. The Children’s Air Ambulance charity have approached the council about locating a textiles collecting bank somewhere in town, but it was decided not to follow it up as a similar facility already exists outside the fire station. The Market Place will be closed for the annual Pancake Race on 24th and 25th February 2020. Jeremy Rawlings suggested that the marquee company are requested not to drive stakes into the tarmac surface of the Market Place as usual, but Dierdre Bethune pointed out that the areas where the surface has broken up is due to traffic movement, not piercing by stakes. The marquee company will be asked to consider alternatives in advance of the future refurbishment of the Market Place, when piercing of the surface will be banned altogether. Deidre Bethune and Jeremy Rawlings expressed their thanks to TOG (The Olney Group) for their hard work in providing the ‘fantastic’ fireworks night that had taken place a few days before. Graham Harrison reported that the Allotment Association would like to create a Community Orchard on part of the field behind the allotments as part of the Amazing Grace 250 celebrations, to be called the Newton Orchard. Funding is available from several sources so it would be at no cost to OTC. This will be considered at a future Recs and Services meeting.

    Next Meeting - 2nd December The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd December in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    December Meeting 2019 (as reported in the 6th January 2020 issue

    Public participation
    First to speak was Danny Conway, from the Milton Keynes area of UNISON. He started by noting that he was attending because Olney Town Council (OTC) was planning to discuss discretionar y powers related to the local government pension scheme. He explained that OTC did not seem to have consulted its staff on this change to their conditions, and it would have been good industrial relations to do so. Further, he felt that what the Council was doing was to its fi nancial disadvantage, the relevant clauses sometimes being useful. Next up was Martin Allen. Around a year ago, he had asked OTC to consider resurfacing the area between the Recreation Ground play area and the MUGA. Noting that this had not been done, he asked if the Council would look again at the area, as he felt it dangerous especially if puddles froze over. He asked if the S106 monies from the development behind the Rugby Club could pay towards it. He concluded by noting that the Dennis Timpson Stand, next to the football pitch adjacent to East Street, appeared to be being misused as a public lavatory. Jeremy Rawlings noted that both issues would be placed on the agenda of the Recreations and Services Committee, the Police already having been informed of the latter. Desmond Eley noted that the resurfacing work had not been forgotten, and was instead waiting for budget, for example from S106 monies, to proceed. Mar y Swallow spoke briefly to ask why the double yellow lines outside her house had not been repainted. She believed this work had been authorised but, while other yellow lines on the High Street had been repainted, hers had not. Tom Winter, Secretary of Olney Rugby Club, was next to speak. He explained that he’d written to OTC with reference to the Council’s submission to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) about the change of use of the Football Club building. In that submission, he explained that OTC had written that the Rugby Club was not in a financial position to put forward a business plan. He noted that these references to the Rugby Club were factually incorrect – it was in a position to take over the lease and make structural alterations to the building as needed. OTC did not go back to the Rugby Club to ask for a business plan, in spite of the Club having formally expressed an interest in the building back in September 2018, noting it was in a position to move forward immediately. Over the next few months, he’d reiterated that the Club had the financial resources to go ahead. However, in one of those conversations, he felt a misunderstanding may have arisen over work on its clubhouse, which is subject to funding from the Rugby Union, which is temporarily unavailable. Its expressed preference at the time was for Olney Town Colts FC to take on the lease, with itself taking it on if they could not, while also noting that the Rugby Club retained an interest in the building. The Club is concerned the submission is somewhat misleading, that information has been put into the public domain which should not have been, perhaps calling into question the integrity of the way the Council worked. Perhaps it had been misrepresented to support a position OTC had taken. He concluded by saying that the Club has no issue with Bodyforce – but sees the misrepresentation as a matter of principle. Last up was Phil Morden who, having lived nearby and been a regular visitor over the last 35 years, had recently moved to the town. He was appalled at the amount of traffi c passing through Olney and also Weston Underwood, which now seemed like a de facto bypass. He’d been interested to read how OTC had helped get the Lavendon Road residential development overturned, due to it not being in the Neighbourhood Plan. That plan had also included the need to reduce traffi c problems, he noted, for example reducing the number of HGVs travelling through the town. He could see no evidence of OTC or MKC having done anything about this. He asked if any progress was being made, and for regular updates for people in the town. Jeremy Rawlings noted that Nor thampton Council had just approved a new housing development just South of Brackmills, from which quite a few residents would likely be travelling along the A509 to and from Milton Keynes. He also explained that the two routes identifi ed for a bypass are preserved in the Neighbourhood Plan – none of their area is allocated for building purposes. However, he explained that a bypass would be dependent on Central Government funding – it costing a signifi cant number of millions to build.

    Approving the Minutes
    Kevin Viney had an issue with one item on the draft minutes of last month’s meeting, in which Councillor Eley had noted that there had recently been a political stand on the Market Place and that this was neither allowed nor authorised. He felt that description signifi cantly cut short the ensuing discussion, in which the Town Clerk had confi rmed that authorisation had been given and in which Kevin had noted that, in the past, all political parties had been welcome to use the Market Place provided this had been properly requested. So, he felt this wording on its own was somewhat misleading, and that those extra points should be added. Jeremy Rawlings noted he was happy for that to be changed.

    Amazing Grace 250
    AG250, shorthand for Amazing Grace 250, is the 250th anniversary of the Amazing Grace hymn being written by John Newton to be delivered at a service in St Peter and St Paul church on 1st January 1773. Paul Collins stepped out of the meeting for this item, having declared an interest because the Cowper and Newton Museum, of which he is a trustee, may benefi t from part of any monies granted by the Council towards the Town’s celebrations in general. This was felt to be a laudable aim and, after some discussion, the Council concluded it was minded to grant up to £5,000 for each of the next three years. This will likely come from the Sydney Dix Community fund.
     
    Pensions discretions policy
    This item, to approve OTC’s pension discretions policy, followed on from Danny Conway’s speech during the Public Participation section. As background, Andrea Vincent noted that most Council staff were members of the Local Government Pension Scheme administered by Buckinghamshire County Council (Bucks CC). One staff member had asked for retirement on a fl exible basis, and this required OTC to get an up to date Employer Discretions Policy, it’s current one being some 20 years outdated and thus not valid as far as Bucks CC was concerned. Councillors had a template policy which discussed what employers might want to do in addition to the terms and conditions. She noted she’d checked with Bucks CC and they’d confi rmed it was an employer’s policy and not part of the terms and conditions, and that the Council as a whole needed to agree an up to date policy. She described various discretionary points from the Policy, namely, giving extra pension where someone might retire early, adding sums of money for people taking fl exible retirement, waiving age limits due to illness, and about the ’85 year rule’ being switched on or off. That rule means a retiree can start to draw benefi ts if the sum of their age and years worked under the scheme add up to at least 85 years. All of these came with signifi cant costs, and it was up to OTC’s discretion to decide which it would allow. The Human Resources (HR) Committee had recommended a policy on each discretion, and OTC debated whether to approve these policies. The long ensuing discussion is summarised for brevity. Joanne Eley noted that any discretionary payments would have to be made from Council funds (in other words, Public funds) resulting in money needing to be raised from the Precept. This point was noted widely. She noted that the pension was more generous than those elsewhere and that the amounts involved would be very signifi cant for OTC. She also noted that Councillors should be aware that a discretionary amount, which could be up to £6,500 per year per retired staff member, would burden the precept payers and future Councillors. It was not an easy decision to make, she said. Kevin Viney, the Councillor coming out most strongly against the policy, felt this a mean spirited financial attack on the staff, no consultation of whom had taken place. Given that morale is already low, he felt the policy’s approach to work conditions represented a move from a John Lewis to a Sports Direct – like relationship with its staff. He asked that the proposal be returned to the HR Committee and that full consultation be performed with staff representatives. Joanne Eley noted that delaying approval of the policy meant delaying a member of staff’s retirement. She asked if Kevin was aware of OTC’s 24.4% contribution to staff pensions. Peter Geary noted that the HR Committee had looked at this, made its recommendations and, if the Council had to go through the issues again, that’s what it must do. After some confusion concerning the impact of the potential extra £6,500 per year per staff member, Desmond Eley explained that, if given to two staff members, it would be an extra 7% on the precept. After further discussion, Jeremy Rawlings asked whether, given that approval for this proposal was required in order for the staff member to retire, Council could approve it in this meeting, reviewing the proposal in six months if felt necessary. This was seconded, voted on and agreed by a comfortable majority.

    Update on former FC planning application
    This refers to the topic which Tom Winter spoke about in the Public Participation section. Jeremy Rawlings introduced this item, noting that BodyForce had submitted a second planning application for the former FC building. There were plenty of submissions on the MKC Planning Portal in favour of the application with just one or two against, he said. Paul Collins started by explaining that Olney Town Football Club had found it impossible to continue and could not meet its obligations to maintain the building. A deed of surrender was prepared and signed, resulting in OTC becoming the freeholder of the building. A survey identifi ed the poor, dilapidated condition of the building, and the Council’s Working Group gave consideration to who could restore and use it. Discussions were had with interested parties, including the Rugby Club and BodyForce, the latter allowed to remain in the building for an interim period. Various of those parties had aspirations for the building, but the Working Group’s genuine feeling from the discussions was that neither the Rugby Club nor Olney Town Colts FC had the fi nancial capacity to improve the building, although clearly this was being disputed this evening. BodyForce had come forward with a detailed business plan and information on how it could be funded, so an announcement was made back in April that they were the preferred tenant. That announcement generated no negative reaction from the other interested parties, and it is only when the change of use planning application is being considered that they started making a comment. He felt the Council had acted properly, protecting the precept payers and ensuring a wide range of amenities were available to the town. Desmond Eley noted that there are past and present Councillors with strong ties to the sports community, but they are unpaid public servants and thus have a duty to Olney’s residents. Councillors are required by law to follow rules and regulations, and to make responsible decisions on how public money is spent. The former chair of the Recreations and Services Committee had led a Working Group to resolve the issues with the Football Club building, which otherwise carried the potential to saddle a huge debt on Olney Residents. This Working Group had presented a paper to full Council recommending it proceed with BodyForce. This had been agreed unanimously and the decision published on the Council’s website. Since then, the Council has spent time and money following that agreement. In the eight months since he joined the Working Group, no group or organisation had asked for an explanation, or what could be offered to enable a reassessment by the Council. He was disappointed that there seemed to be ongoing attempts to thwart the business of the Council. This second planning application will come before the MKC Development Control Committee on 23rd Januar y. Desmond Eley suggested resurrecting the regular Joint User Group meetings for those using the Recreation Ground as a way of avoiding misunderstandings in future.

    Bits ‘n’ Bobs
    A speed detection van will be spending around 16 hours per week in Olney for a period. This was as a result of speed data collected by Olney Speedwatch. The van has already issued 20 tickets for speeding on Aspreys in its fi rst week of operation. Kevin Viney pointed out that, due to the way in which the white lines around the Market Place have been repainted, it is no longer clear that there are four disabled parking spaces, there appearing to be only one. He suggested the Council ask MKC to paint ‘disabled’ for the three remaining spaces. Colin Rodden noted that there were drainage problems at the side of the High Street both outside Brocks and the old Natwest building. Peter Geary suggested Councillors take pictures next time these areas fl ooded, to send to MKC to help justify it investigating. Chris Tenant noted that the Sainsbur y’s developers had not replaced the 30 MPH turrets, which were meant to be moved further down Lavendon Road. OTC has asked MKC’s Highways department to reposition them. He also noted that, when pulling out of the Sainsbury’s car park, visibility left onto Lavendon Road is poor. With Kevin Viney also noting a road crossing issue in the area, Peter Geary suggested the Council arrange a meeting of the MKC Road Safety Team to discuss issues around the new Sainsbury’s development.

    Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th January in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



     
    -------
    Mercury's reports for 2020 Issues


    December Meeting 2019 (as reported in the January 2020 issue

    Public participation
    First to speak was Danny Conway, from the Milton Keynes area of UNISON. He started by noting that he was attending because Olney Town Council (OTC) was planning to discuss discretionar y powers related to the local government pension scheme. He explained that OTC did not seem to have consulted its staff on this change to their conditions, and it would have been good industrial relations to do so. Further, he felt that what the Council was doing was to its fi nancial disadvantage, the relevant clauses sometimes being useful. Next up was Martin Allen. Around a year ago, he had asked OTC to consider resurfacing the area between the Recreation Ground play area and the MUGA. Noting that this had not been done, he asked if the Council would look again at the area, as he felt it dangerous especially if puddles froze over. He asked if the S106 monies from the development behind the Rugby Club could pay towards it. He concluded by noting that the Dennis Timpson Stand, next to the football pitch adjacent to East Street, appeared to be being misused as a public lavatory. Jeremy Rawlings noted that both issues would be placed on the agenda of the Recreations and Services Committee, the Police already having been informed of the latter. Desmond Eley noted that the resurfacing work had not been forgotten, and was instead waiting for budget, for example from S106 monies, to proceed. Mar y Swallow spoke briefly to ask why the double yellow lines outside her house had not been repainted. She believed this work had been authorised but, while other yellow lines on the High Street had been repainted, hers had not. Tom Winter, Secretary of Olney Rugby Club, was next to speak. He explained that he’d written to OTC with reference to the Council’s submission to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) about the change of use of the Football Club building. In that submission, he explained that OTC had written that the Rugby Club was not in a fi nancial position to put forward a business plan. He noted that these references to the Rugby Club were factually incorrect – it was in a position to take over the lease and make structural alterations to the building as needed. OTC did not go back to the Rugby Club to ask for a business plan, in spite of the Club having formally expressed an interest in the building back in September 2018, noting it was in a position to move forward immediately. Over the next few months, he’d reiterated that the Club had the fi nancial resources to go ahead. However, in one of those conversations, he felt a misunderstanding may have arisen over work on its clubhouse, which is subject to funding from the Rugby Union, which is temporarily unavailable. Its expressed preference at the time was for Olney Town Colts FC to take on the lease, with itself taking it on if they could not, while also noting that the Rugby Club retained an interest in the building. The Club is concerned the submission is somewhat misleading, that information has been put into the public domain which should not have been, perhaps calling into question the integrity of the way the Council worked. Perhaps it had been misrepresented to support a position OTC had taken. He concluded by saying that the Club has no issue with Bodyforce – but sees the misrepresentation as a matter of principle. Last up was Phil Morden who, having lived nearby and been a regular visitor over the last 35 years, had recently moved to the town. He was appalled at the amount of traffi c passing through Olney and also Weston Underwood, which now seemed like a de facto bypass. He’d been interested to read how OTC had helped get the Lavendon Road residential development overturned, due to it not being in the Neighbourhood Plan. That plan had also included the need to reduce traffi c problems, he noted, for example reducing the number of HGVs travelling through the town. He could see no evidence of OTC or MKC having done anything about this. He asked if any progress was being made, and for regular updates for people in the town. Jeremy Rawlings noted that Nor thampton Council had just approved a new housing development just South of Brackmills, from which quite a few residents would likely be travelling along the A509 to and from Milton Keynes. He also explained that the two routes identifi ed for a bypass are preserved in the Neighbourhood Plan – none of their area is allocated for building purposes. However, he explained that a bypass would be dependent on Central Government funding – it costing a signifi cant number of millions to build.

    Approving the Minutes
    Kevin Viney had an issue with one item on the draft minutes of last month’s meeting, in which Councillor Eley had noted that there had recently been a political stand on the Market Place and that this was neither allowed nor authorised. He felt that description signifi cantly cut short the ensuing discussion, in which the Town Clerk had confi rmed that authorisation had been given and in which Kevin had noted that, in the past, all political parties had been welcome to use the Market Place provided this had been properly requested. So, he felt this wording on its own was somewhat misleading, and that those extra points should be added. Jeremy Rawlings noted he was happy for that to be changed.

    Amazing Grace 250
    AG250, shorthand for Amazing Grace 250, is the 250th anniversary of the Amazing Grace hymn being written by John Newton to be delivered at a service in St Peter and St Paul church on 1st January 1773. Paul Collins stepped out of the meeting for this item, having declared an interest because the Cowper and Newton Museum, of which he is a trustee, may benefi t from part of any monies granted by the Council towards the Town’s celebrations in general. This was felt to be a laudable aim and, after some discussion, the Council concluded it was minded to grant up to £5,000 for each of the next three years. This will likely come from the Sydney Dix Community fund.
     

    Pensions discretions policy
    This item, to approve OTC’s pension discretions policy, followed on from Danny Conway’s speech during the Public Participation section. As background, Andrea Vincent noted that most Council staff were members of the Local Government Pension Scheme administered by Buckinghamshire County Council (Bucks CC). One staff member had asked for retirement on a fl exible basis, and this required OTC to get an up to date Employer Discretions Policy, it’s current one being some 20 years outdated and thus not valid as far as Bucks CC was concerned. Councillors had a template policy which discussed what employers might want to do in addition to the terms and conditions. She noted she’d checked with Bucks CC and they’d confi rmed it was an employer’s policy and not part of the terms and conditions, and that the Council as a whole needed to agree an up to date policy. She described various discretionary points from the Policy, namely, giving extra pension where someone might retire early, adding sums of money for people taking fl exible retirement, waiving age limits due to illness, and about the ’85 year rule’ being switched on or off. That rule means a retiree can start to draw benefi ts if the sum of their age and years worked under the scheme add up to at least 85 years. All of these came with signifi cant costs, and it was up to OTC’s discretion to decide which it would allow. The Human Resources (HR) Committee had recommended a policy on each discretion, and OTC debated whether to approve these policies. The long ensuing discussion is summarised for brevity. Joanne Eley noted that any discretionary payments would have to be made from Council funds (in other words, Public funds) resulting in money needing to be raised from the Precept. This point was noted widely. She noted that the pension was more generous than those elsewhere and that the amounts involved would be very signifi cant for OTC. She also noted that Councillors should be aware that a discretionary amount, which could be up to £6,500 per year per retired staff member, would burden the precept payers and future Councillors. It was not an easy decision to make, she said. Kevin Viney, the Councillor coming out most strongly against the policy, felt this a mean spirited financial attack on the staff, no consultation of whom had taken place. Given that morale is already low, he felt the policy’s approach to work conditions represented a move from a John Lewis to a Sports Direct – like relationship with its staff. He asked that the proposal be returned to the HR Committee and that full consultation be performed with staff representatives. Joanne Eley noted that delaying approval of the policy meant delaying a member of staff’s retirement. She asked if Kevin was aware of OTC’s 24.4% contribution to staff pensions. Peter Geary noted that the HR Committee had looked at this, made its recommendations and, if the Council had to go through the issues again, that’s what it must do. After some confusion concerning the impact of the potential extra £6,500 per year per staff member, Desmond Eley explained that, if given to two staff members, it would be an extra 7% on the precept. After further discussion, Jeremy Rawlings asked whether, given that approval for this proposal was required in order for the staff member to retire, Council could approve it in this meeting, reviewing the proposal in six months if felt necessary. This was seconded, voted on and agreed by a comfortable majority.

    Update on former FC planning application
    This refers to the topic which Tom Winter spoke about in the Public Participation section. Jeremy Rawlings introduced this item, noting that BodyForce had submitted a second planning application for the former FC building. There were plenty of submissions on the MKC Planning Portal in favour of the application with just one or two against, he said. Paul Collins started by explaining that Olney Town Football Club had found it impossible to continue and could not meet its obligations to maintain the building. A deed of surrender was prepared and signed, resulting in OTC becoming the freeholder of the building. A survey identifi ed the poor, dilapidated condition of the building, and the Council’s Working Group gave consideration to who could restore and use it. Discussions were had with interested parties, including the Rugby Club and BodyForce, the latter allowed to remain in the building for an interim period. Various of those parties had aspirations for the building, but the Working Group’s genuine feeling from the discussions was that neither the Rugby Club nor Olney Town Colts FC had the fi nancial capacity to improve the building, although clearly this was being disputed this evening. BodyForce had come forward with a detailed business plan and information on how it could be funded, so an announcement was made back in April that they were the preferred tenant. That announcement generated no negative reaction from the other interested parties, and it is only when the change of use planning application is being considered that they started making a comment. He felt the Council had acted properly, protecting the precept payers and ensuring a wide range of amenities were available to the town. Desmond Eley noted that there are past and present Councillors with strong ties to the sports community, but they are unpaid public servants and thus have a duty to Olney’s residents. Councillors are required by law to follow rules and regulations, and to make responsible decisions on how public money is spent. The former chair of the Recreations and Services Committee had led a Working Group to resolve the issues with the Football Club building, which otherwise carried the potential to saddle a huge debt on Olney Residents. This Working Group had presented a paper to full Council recommending it proceed with BodyForce. This had been agreed unanimously and the decision published on the Council’s website. Since then, the Council has spent time and money following that agreement. In the eight months since he joined the Working Group, no group or organisation had asked for an explanation, or what could be offered to enable a reassessment by the Council. He was disappointed that there seemed to be ongoing attempts to thwart the business of the Council. This second planning application will come before the MKC Development Control Committee on 23rd Januar y. Desmond Eley suggested resurrecting the regular Joint User Group meetings for those using the Recreation Ground as a way of avoiding misunderstandings in future.

    Bits ‘n’ Bobs
    A speed detection van will be spending around 16 hours per week in Olney for a period. This was as a result of speed data collected by Olney Speedwatch. The van has already issued 20 tickets for speeding on Aspreys in its fi rst week of operation. Kevin Viney pointed out that, due to the way in which the white lines around the Market Place have been repainted, it is no longer clear that there are four disabled parking spaces, there appearing to be only one. He suggested the Council ask MKC to paint ‘disabled’ for the three remaining spaces. Colin Rodden noted that there were drainage problems at the side of the High Street both outside Brocks and the old Natwest building. Peter Geary suggested Councillors take pictures next time these areas fl ooded, to send to MKC to help justify it investigating. Chris Tenant noted that the Sainsbur y’s developers had not replaced the 30 MPH turrets, which were meant to be moved further down Lavendon Road. OTC has asked MKC’s Highways department to reposition them. He also noted that, when pulling out of the Sainsbury’s car park, visibility left onto Lavendon Road is poor. With Kevin Viney also noting a road crossing issue in the area, Peter Geary suggested the Council arrange a meeting of the MKC Road Safety Team to discuss issues around the new Sainsbury’s development.

    Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th January in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    Olney Council report for 6th January 2020

    Introduction:
    Mayor Jeremy Rawlings welcomed members to the first meeting of Olney Town Council (OTC) of 2020. He explained that the council had recently migrated to a new email system, which seemed to be working well. One of the individual members to reply to emails as OTC, which gives a ‘unified voice’. Unusually there were no members of the public wishing to speak at this month’s meeting, and with a short agenda Mercury looked forward to an early night. 

    Approving the minutes
    Jeremy Rawlings noted that concern about the state of the Dennis Timpson stand had been raised under public participation by Martin Allen and not Dennis Timpson himself. Chris Tennant pointed out that under Members Matters, minuted as ‘None’, he had raised the issue of poor visibility at the new Sainsbury’s entrance and also the fact that the developers had not replaced the 30mph turrets.  Additionally, the land beside the development (Site R) appeared to be being used as a rubbish dump. Colin Rodden noted that he had reported that there were drainage problems at the side of the High Street both outside Brocks and the old Natwest building, but that had not been minuted.

    Policy on charges for use of The Olney Centre
    Jeremy Rawling introduced this item saying some groups use the centre who have a verbal agreement with previous Town Clerks or mayors that get free or reduced rates, and none of this is documented. The proposal is to charge all groups the same amount and certain approved groups would get a grant to offset this. In the interests of transparency, the amount of the grant would be made public. Milton Keynes Councillor (MKC) Peter Geary declared an interest saying that he and his fellow Ward Councillors use the centre free of charge for their monthly surgeries, although he was happy for MKC to be charged. Steve Clark said that there had been a long-standing arrangement that had been agreed by OTC for over 20 years. Paul Collins felt that the core policy should be to charge the full fee for commercial use but a reduced rate for local groups. Peter Geary agreed, pointing out that local residents pay for the upkeep of the centre through the precept in the Council Tax. Desmond Eley noted that substantial remedial work will be taking place in the near future and the council needed to decide if the costs would be met through the precept, Section 106 grants or the hire charges.  Joanne Eley noted that OTC gave free usage or reduced rates to a number of worthy organisations, but the people of the town are unaware of it. If grants were made to offset the charges, these could be documented in the report which is presented at the annual town meeting. Jeremy Rawlings proposed that all users are notified of the standard charge but advised that they could apply for the offset grant and Olney Centre Management and Recs and Services Committees be asked to investigate a realistic commercial charge. This generated considerable discussion as to whether it is just simpler to maintain the status quo and charge a reduced rate. Joanne Eley pointed out that OTC already make some grants to groups that also get a reduced or nil charge, so it was essential to have a more transparent policy. Peter Geary proposed that the Clerk should be empowered to make a decision for one-off booking situations which would be notified to the Olney Centre Management Committee but where a regular booking is requested then the committee would make the decision. It was agreed to adopt the policy from the start of the new Financial Year.

    Community Infrastructure Fund
    The Community Infrastructure Fund allows parish and town councils to submit applications for their own community improvements or enhancements. It enables a variety of different public realm schemes that have a positive impact on a community to be implemented. These can include projects related to highways, community buildings, environment, landscaping etc. MKC has a total pot of £200k, and each parish/town can apply for a maximum of £20k to be match funded, which will be awarded in the current financial year for projects that must be completed within the next two years.  The deadline for applications is 7th February.  Jeremy Rawlings invited ideas as to what projects should be considered and where the additional funding should come from. Paul Collins said it should be a project to benefit the whole community and suggested outdoor gym equipment similar to that installed in Emberton Park. He had identified a number of potential suppliers, he said. Deirdre Bethune said the equipment in Harrold Country Park was of much better quality.  Town Clerk Andrea Vincent had already suggested a drinking fountain, as discussed at previous meetings, which then lead to something of a tangential conversation regarding the merits of drinking fountains versus refill points. Acknowledging that OTC had already discussed the provision of fixed drinking fountains, Steve Clerk suggested a scheme whereby local businesses could be encouraged to provide free water refills, as  Phonebox Magazine already does. This would be preferable to a fixed physical structure with all the cost of connecting it into the water mains, he thought. Deirdre Bethune thought it was not so inviting as having something that was ‘available and physical’, and not everybody would have the app showing the locations of refill points.  Paul Collins supported Steve’s idea, saying that people should be treated as adults are were quite capable of carrying a bottle and refilling it. Bringing things back on track, Desmond Eley wondered if the grant could be used towards the refurbishment of the public toilets on the market Place. Deirdre Bethune pointed out that the last time costs for the refurbishment were obtained it was in excess of £30k so did not get done. It was now more likely to be £50k, she thought. Peter Geary was of the opinion that the grant awarded to individual councils was likely to be less than £20k and would be better put towards a project that was already agreed.  Colin Rodden suggested asking for public input to decide a suitable project, but this was generally thought to be unfeasible, given the short timescale for submission and the likelihood of requests for a swimming pool. It was decided to investigate Paul Collins’ suggestion of outdoor gym equipment. Chris Tennant suggested that the equipment could be spread around the town to provide a ‘Trim Trail’. 

    Reindeer at Dickens of a Christmas
    Colin Rodden raised the issue of live reindeer being kept in a small pen at Fountain Court on Dickens of Christmas day and referred to a Times article condemning such displays. For information, the article stated that animal rights activists had been picketing events where live reindeer were present in an attempt to persuade the public to boycott them.  The protesters claimed that transporting and displaying the sensitive animals around noisy crowds caused them great distress and said they were not props to be paraded around for human entertainment. Colin wondered if it was appropriate for reindeer to be present at an event organised by OTC.  Jeremy Rawlings rejected the claims, saying that the display was organised by a private individual on private land, not part of Dickens and therefore in no way connected with OTC. He had seen the animals himself, and they did not look at all distressed. He said Steve Clark had refuted the article as it was extremely one-sided and not backed up with any qualifications.  Graham Harrison noted that the reindeer had been displayed at the property for a number of years previously and it just happened that this year coincided with Dickens. Steve Clark concluded by saying that if anyone had any concerns at this year’s event, then they should phone the RSPCA who will send out an inspector to investigate.

    unknown
    A Reindeer in Fountain Court, Olney

    Accessibility problems to public buildings
    Newly-elected councillor Debbie Whitworth, who suffers from MS and is herself a wheelchair user, raised the issue of difficult access to shops and other public buildings in the town for physically impaired people and wondered if the council could do anything to improve matters. Jeremy Rawlings said that where a planning application was made to improve access, then it would be looked on favourably by the council.  Steve Clark noted that when the Disability Discrimination Act was passed, it became incumbent on all businesses to take reasonable steps to enable accessibility, but in some premises it was just not practical. He noted that where wheelchair access was not possible, some businesses had made alternative arrangements, such as provision of an external bell button, but such arrangements had not always continued when the businesses changed hands. It was agreed that the council will initiate a communications campaign to actively promote improved accessibility to shops via a number of channels.

    Odds and Sods Peter Geary noted that Grounds Café in Emberton Park had now closed and the Park Liaison User’s Group (PLUG) would need to decide what was required as a temporary replacement so that MKC could start the procurement process. Steve Clark reported that a member of the public had complained about the ‘chaos’ caused by contractors currently working on the extension to Broomfield residential care home in Yardley Road. They arrive early in the morning and fill all the available parking spaces and have totally trashed the grass verge, he said. Clerk Andrea Vincent said she had received a number of similar complaints and had contacted the manager at Broomfield who assured her that remedial work would take place once the construction work was completed. Colin Rodden asked why Lime Street is currently closed. Peter Geary explained that it is due to a wall having fallen down and the road is expected to be closed for three to four months. Colin Rodden reported that the previous Saturday a number of youngsters had been seen cycling at speed on the pavement in the High Street and wondered if it was possible to have some sort of ‘shared use’ arrangement for pedestrians and cyclist.  Paul Collins reported that the Olney Masonic Club would be sponsoring the Graham Fulford Trust to offer free PSA testing for prostate cancer in The Cherry Tree between 10.00 and 13.00 on Sunday 1st March.

    Next Meeting The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    Olney Council report for 3rd February 2020 (Reported in the March 2020 Issue)

    Introduction
    Prior to the main meeting, Victoria Southern from Bovis Homes presented the outline plans for the new development off Yardley Road to the members of Olney Town Council (OTC). One point of discussion was the large area of land allocated for recreational use at the north end of the site. It appears that the landowner is only prepared to sell part of the land, initially, and will fence off the remaining one Hectare section which was expected to remain as publicly accessible open space (effectively retaining it as a ‘ransom’ strip as leverage to get permission for a second phase). Any future development would be beyond that which is currently agreed in the Neighbourhood Plan (NP). Chris Tennant observed that this would be outside of the ‘red line’ town boundary agreed in the NP. One member wryly observed that the fence might not stay up very long. Peter Geary requested that a meeting be arranged between Bovis, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Planning Officers and Ward Councillors, and residents of adjacent properties to address any concerns that they may have.

    Public Participation
    Two residents wished to speak at this month’s meeting. First was Catherine Rose from Olney Sustainable Futures group (OSF) and also a member of the Climate Emergency Working Group, who was attending with fellow member Jane Varley. Catherine thanked the members and staff of OTC that had been involved in their work so far and said that much of the proposed action would go through the council’s Recreation and Services Committee, but she wanted to bring the rest of the council up to speed. She said they would be attending the Pancake Race to provide some plant-based recipes and are looking at organising a free Eco fair, hopefully in the Olney Centre. This event was an item on the agenda of the main meeting. Catherine went on to say that the Rugby Club has developed its own sustainability strategy, and the group are looking to them to be a model for other community organisations in the town.  Next to speak was James Cooper who talked about the problems of parking in Conygere, particularly on market days. With parking on both sides of the road, there is very little room for traffic to pass and it is an accident waiting to happen, he thought. He had personally seen several near-misses and asked if double yellow lines could be provided. His second point was about prohibitively expensive property prices in Olney preventing young people from getting on the property ladder. His own daughter had been affected, he said, and quoted an example of a town similar to Olney where preferential treatment was given to local people who could show an ‘attachment’ to the town. If Olney had some land that could be used in a similar manner could a deal be done with a local trust to build such houses in the town? Olney will be a town without young people if something isn’t done, he said. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings, whilst having some sympathy, said that OTC does not have any building land. Peter Geary and Chris Tennant explained that of the 250 new houses that will be built at the north end of the town, 75 will be ‘affordable housing’ with shared ownership and 10% of those will be for local people, managed via a Housing Association. 

    Eco Fair
    This item followed on from Catherine Rose’s input to the public participation section. The proposal is to hold the event in the Olney Centre on Saturday 18th April. It would be a ‘co-production’ between OTC for which it satisfies a number of its aims for the Climate Emergency plans, and Olney Sustainable Futures which would undertake the planning and execution. It would consist of a number of elements: The food section would promote plant-based catering with snacks and cakes being available, along with tasting, demonstrations and recipes. The activities section would consist of games, non-food products, and information on climate plans, waste and recycling and grow your own. The repair section would cover gadgets and small white goods, and furniture and clothing. The Library might also be involved. Colin Rodden and Deidre Bethune supported the idea of having a joint OTC/OSF event. Deirdre suggested that OTC should waive the hire charge for the event. Paul Collins asked if the stallholders would be commercial entities, in which case consideration should be given to the rental aspect. Joanne Eley was concerned about the partnership aspect of the event, since OTC would be seen to be endorsing everything that happened at it, and suggested that it should be supported by way of a grant in line with the discussion about rental fees at the previous month’s meeting. The Climate Emergency Working Group of OTC is a separate entity to the Sustainable Futures group, she pointed out. A vote was taken and passed by a majority of 9 to 2, with those who voted against saying they did so only because they did not know enough about OSF as an organisation. Jeremy Rawlings said that the Climate Emergency Working Group would be tasked with providing a plan to be presented to full council at next month’s meeting to enable OTC to endorse the entire event.

    VE Day Celebrations
    The government have moved the date of the traditional ‘May Day’ bank Holiday from Monday 4th of May to Friday the 8th in order to celebrate the 75th anniversary of VE Day. Chris Roberts was in attendance representing the Royal British Legion. Steve Clark said that in the past similar events have been marked by the lighting of the beacon on Barnfield. It appears that other local organisations are waiting to see what OTC organises before making plans. It was agreed that OTC would work with them to come up with a plan. Peter Geary noted that although it will be a Bank Holiday, it will be the day following the election for members of OTC, and the count will be taking place.

    Mayor's Statement
    Mayor Jeremy Rawlings read out the following statement:  “Some councillors have breached the code of conduct by discussing confidential matters with individual members of staff and with others. They have commented disrespectfully and incorrectly on member colleagues and staff by name outside the realm of confidential council business. Some councillors are also misrepresenting council policies and decisions. This is of detriment to the council as a whole and must cease. In the same vein, I have asked the town clerk to speak to staff to remind them that they are not to discuss council matters or individual councillors in or outside work in such a way as to the detriment of the council, which is covered in the Staff Handbook, as this will result in disciplinary action.”  He explained that this has come about because a specific incident which is ongoing has been made more difficult by comments that certain councillors have made. He said he did not propose to hold any further discussion at the meeting but invited councillors to speak to him individually, if they wished.

    Annual Town Meeting
    This will take place on Friday 24th April at 7pm in the Olney Centre and is your chance to find out what the council have been doing during the past year and question them on any matters you wish.

    Budget 2020/2021
    This is the time of year when OTC produce the budget proposals for the next financial year, which in turn determines how much the precept (the portion of the Council Tax collected by MKC for local services and returned to OTC) will rise. Chair of Finance Paul Collins reported that the budget will increase from £243K to £260K which, allowing for the additional 27 taxable dwellings, will be an overall increase of 12.36%. The Band D ‘baseline’ figure will rise from £89.79 per month to £100.89. Desmond Eley said that it was important to have clarity as to what Section 106 money would be available from MKC now and in the future. Section 106, commonly known as ‘planning gain’ is a mechanism which makes a development proposal acceptable in planning terms, that would not otherwise be acceptable. It is focused on site-specific mitigation of the impact of development, and a proportion is usually made available to local/parish councils for capital projects. This can be a considerable amount of money in the case of major developments, such as that proposed for Yardley Road. Desmond said that he understood that MKC would be retaining this money in the future rather than passing it to the parishes. In this case, the precept is the only income that would be available for capital projects. Jeremy Rawlings thought that this was an ‘absolute disgrace’ particularly when MKC are looking to off-load more and more service provisions to the parishes. He pointed out that it had been necessary to significantly increase the fees that the council charges for things such as hire of the Olney Centre and market stalls. Burial fees have almost doubled, but that still made Olney almost 50% cheaper than Milton Keynes, he said. The budget was passed on a unanimous vote.

    Events
    Motorama, run by the Newport Pagnell and Olney Lions, will be held on the Market Place on Sunday 14th June. The Olney Group (TOG) will run Riverfest on Sunday 5th July on the Recreation Ground with the Riverfest Rocks musical event the night before in the marquee. Olney Rugby Club will be holding the annual 7s Tournament on Saturday 20th June. 

    Odds and Sods
    Kevin Viney noted that council website is now considerably out of date. A recently elected councillor had submitted their profile information, but that had still not been added. The most recent set of minutes were from June last year, and he had received complaints from residents who wanted to check that details of planning discussions had been faithfully recorded. The clerk reported that this is due to be addressed in coming weeks.  Graham Harrison said he had received complaints from residents of Timpson’s Row that car parking by people using the sports facilities was causing problems. Also, the pavement by the gate is now a ‘sheet of mud’ due to players removing their boots and scraping the mud off. He noted that the new LED street lighting was failing earlier than expected, particularly along Aspreys. Peter Geary responded that in some case it was the sensors that had failed, rather than the LEDs. Colin Rodden noted that a bench on Weston Road had been removed for repair over a year ago and still not replaced. He also reported that he’d recently had to use the public toilets on the marketplace and wondered if there was any money in the budget for air-freshener? Desmond Eley said he had been carrying out some research as to how much refurbishment would cost, which was in the region of £50K, and every member of the public he had spoken to had said that they would rather the money was spent elsewhere and they would prefer to use the facilities of the nearby pubs and cafes.

    Next Meeting The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.



    Olney Council report for 2nd March 2020

    Public participation
    Julia Chapman, who runs ‘My Little Vintage’ in Olney, was first to speak. Many years a passionate advocate of craft and up-cycling, she explained she’d run various vintage events elsewhere with attendances in the thousands. For example, a recent event in Towcester attracted 6,000 visitors over a weekend. She’d come to Olney Town Council (OTC) to learn who she should ask in order to hold such events in the town, for example on the Market Place. Jeremy Rawlings said the Council would look into it, and asked for an item to be added to the next meeting’s agenda. James Cooper had complained to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) about the state of Swan Court in Olney, where a mix of surface mud and leaf mulch made the lines hard to see and the surface slippery. While MKC acknowledged his reporting it, he had no way of knowing when the problem might be addressed. Peter Geary, a Ward Councillor, noted the appropriate ‘FS’ number to investigate. James also noted his concern re Angle Properties’ application to build retirement apartments near Sainsbury’s. Instead, houses and flats for young people were required, he felt. Chris Tenant explained that, with MKC having refused this application, Angle had asked for a Planning Enquiry but been given a, less costly, Planning Hearing for which the date was awaited. Chris explained that OTC had requested ‘Rule six status’, so it could have a seat around the table, presumably alongside Angle’s legal representatives, to put its case for refusal. Peter Geary noted that OTC needed to work with MKC, both having the same aim. The meeting will be public, likely in the Olney Centre, with anyone entitled to attend and contribute. OTC will publish the date once set.

    Annual meeting
    This item covered the deceptively simple task of setting the date of the annual meeting, when the Mayor and Deputy Mayor are elected for the forthcoming year and members appointed to Council committees. The annual meeting, usually arranged to coincide with a monthly full Council meeting, must be held more than four, but not more than 14, days after the Council elections, this year due to be held on Thursday 7th May. Thus, the combined annual-then-monthly meeting will be held on Monday 18th May. Note: As of 13th March, the local elections due on 7th May have been postponed for a year due to coronavirus concerns. At the time of writing, OTC’s website has May’s full Council meeting scheduled for the 4th, the first Monday in the month as usual.

    Bits’n’bobs
    The Council reviewed and approved its risk management register. This covers risks including governance, for example breach of confidentiality, and finance, for example unexpected expenses and payments not received. It also briefly discussed the West Northamptonshire Strategic Plan, Chris Tenant noting that various of the Northamptonshire growth plans, for example in Wellingborough and Kettering, would increase traffic on the A509 through Olney. Councillors agreed to note the document, but give no immediate response.

    Allotment proposal
    Desmond Eley introduced a proposal that, from 1st October, the Olney Allotment Holders’ Association (OAHA) take over day to day administration of the allotments including plot management, invoicing and rent collection. He said the Recreation and Services Committee had recommended the proposal be put to full Council for its view before spending the money required to draw up a proper legal agreement. The proposal is for OTC to pay an initial £500 setup grant, and receive 50% of the approx. £4,000 total annual allotment rents. OTC has to pay for maintenance of the road to, and mowing around the edge of, the allotments, and the water supply. Jeremy Rawlings questioned whether 50% was the right figure. Des noted that the finances of the allotments do not make sense as far as OTC is concerned – its costs far exceed the current rents – but that it had a statutory obligation to provide allotments to suit the level of demand from local residents. The allotments are not meant to break even. Paul Collins felt the document too vague on financial considerations, including a reference to an annual subsidy or grant – what was this designed to cover? He also felt there’d be no saving in Council administrative costs, as the office staff would of course continue to be employed. In summary, he was concerned the Council was halving its rental income while exposing itself to the need to pay for annual subsidies or grants. Now allotment administration was coming under control, he felt there was equally a case for keeping it in house. Colin Rodden noted the access road being in need of maintenance. Desmond explained that the Council was increasing allotment rents up to the statutory annual limit of around 2%, but this increase wouldn’t nearly cover costs. Sally Pezaro felt that, while there was insufficient detail in the document, the OAHA taking on administration would in fact reduce the costs to the Council since its office staff would spend less time doing it, freeing them for other work. Desmond noted that the annual subsidy or grant was very much up for discussion and review, once a year or so had passed and a clearer idea of the finances emerged. Joanne Eley noted that this was not the final document, only agreement in principle being required at this point. Peter Geary felt the allotments would best be managed as locally as possible, by the OAHA, but care was needed in drawing up the detail of the agreement. Councillors agreed in principle to proceed down this route, with a full proposal expected in three months or so. Desmond concluded the item, noting his intention to find a similar legal agreement between another Council and its local allotment association and adapt it – not reinventing the wheel.

    Climate change working group
    Deirdre Bethune introduced this item. Some members of the climate change working group had been surprised to hear, around six months after having appointed a Council employee, that he was not in fact allowed to be in the group. While that decision was fine in itself, first she was frustrated it had taken so long to inform them, and second that the group itself wasn’t told, some of them instead hearing the news at a Recreation and Services Committee meeting. Also, the group wanted to learn its remit. For example, group member Jane Varley had volunteered to perform an energy audit on all OTC property, the group feeling that the Olney Centre was the best place to start. Was this something the Council would like done? Jeremy Rawlings explained that if it was a Council working group, then it had to abide by Council rules, including members declaring interests and signing the code of conduct. If all members were not prepared to do that, it couldn’t be a full working group of the Council and therefore, while it could formulate policies and present them to Council to consider and adopt, it would operate (with an advisory role) outside the Council. Deirdre replied it had indeed been set up as a working group, but had not done any of these things as it had not been asked to. She felt sure all on the group would abide by the code of conduct, but that it still needed a remit. Joanne Eley was keen to avoid duplication. MKC had outlined but was still completing its strategy, so OTC did not yet have its remit from the Council above. Peter Geary explained that if the group was advisory, it could be set up more informally and give advice to the Council for it to decide on. However, if set up as a formal decision making body, only members who are Councillors could vote. Governance of unelected decision making bodies was fraught with problems, he said. The energy audit, however, was a good idea. Colin Rodden thanked the volunteers for spending so much time to move this forward – a good example of public engagement. He felt the Council needed targets amongst the various committees – we all need to do our bit as Councillors. Steve Clark noted the membership of the group is fixed, Council represented by himself, Deirdre and Colin, and three members of the public, Jane Varley, Sarah Michalik and Catherine Rose. Desmond Eley noted that the members of the public on a Council working group must be approved by the Council. Joanne Eley noted that, with all six group members also being members of Olney Sustainable Futures, why couldn’t that group advise the Council instead? Deirdre and Steve disagreed with this, citing that all six were probably also members of the Olney Noticeboard. Chris Tenant felt making the group an advisory one would be a good idea, with its remit based on topics it discussed while being formed. It should concentrate on changes which could be made at the local and community level.  Although no decision was made, the Council seemed to be moving towards making the group an advisory one.

    Exclusive Rights of Burial and Memorials
    Each full OTC meeting contains an agenda item ‘To approve Exclusive Rights of Burial and Memorials’. This generally passes with little discussion, reported rarely due to its personal nature. Jeremy Rawlings proposed removing it on the basis it’s not required and all Councillors do is say ‘yes’. Various views were expressed, Sally Pezaro thinking it be included only if controversial, Deirdre Bethune that it be retained as a courtesy to those who’ve died and their relatives. Peter Geary believed that Exclusive Rights of Burial are a legal agreement between the Council and whoever they’re granted to, which meant the item had to pass through Council even if only as a nodding exercise. Colin Rodden felt it should be retained and that, along with ‘Members’ Matters’ also coming off the agenda, this was part of a ‘dumbing down’ of the Council. Desmond Eley explained that an Exclusive Right of Burial is the right to have a body in the ground at a specified location, effectively the purchase of a plot. Therefore, if such rights remain an agenda item, Council must make sure those noted have purchased their plots. Joanne Eley felt the Council should let Andrea, the Town Clerk and absent this meeting, explain the case, her having just been on a relevant training course. The item was postponed until next month.

    Milton Keynes Futures 2050
    If you’re interested in the long term future of Milton Keynes, including Olney, surf to https://www.mkfutures2050.com/, scroll down and click ‘Learn more about the Strategy for 2050’, click ‘Read the Draft Strategy for 2050’ then search for Olney. The Council has until 17th April to submit its views on that document to MKC. Peter Geary explained that around 1500 houses were earmarked for Olney in the timeframe, reported elsewhere. The report notes ‘In areas that have poor access to services, additional people living nearby could help to make new facilities viable. As an example, growth at Olney would only be made feasible by the provision of a bypass and/or connection to the mass transit network, with significant benefits that created for the existing town.’ The Council had some fundamental decisions to make. For example, should it agree to this number of houses with only the promise of a bypass? Get this wrong, he warned, and Olney may end up with 1500 houses but no bypass. Chris Tenant noted that, at a recent Olney Development Group meeting, the group resolved that MK Futures 2050 should be an agenda item at this meeting. Yet it wasn’t. Jeremy Rawlings stated it should have been but this connection had been lost. Since it wasn’t on the agenda, Peter suggested closing the meeting, then having a general discussion to learn Councillors’ views so that an informed response could then be drawn up in time to be finalised at next month’s meeting and subsequently submitted. Further, he felt Councillors needed to talk to the public over the coming weeks to seek their views. Peter felt the 1500 houses would be ‘planned within months’ with developers keen to build them, yet a bypass would need national funding and could thus be a few decades away, if it ever happened. Chris Tenant noted that ‘a growth scenario’ suggested 1500 houses, and it was for Council to make comments on the various scenarios. He also referred to the mass transit system, which had a big ticket cost – fantastic, but something which Peter noted would perhaps not in fact make it all the way out to Olney. John Boardman asked Jeremy Rawlings if it was possible that Councillors could leave this meeting with some commitment from him to liaise with the Town Clerk to ensure the necessary mechanism be put in place to enable Councillors to comply with the matters Peter and Chris had raised. Jeremy noted that there was still time. Desmond Eley noted that the 2050 plan, with 1500 houses, is in complete compliance with Olney’s Neighbourhood Plan, which includes a bypass to the West, and which the people of Olney voted for by narrow majority. By having a Neighbourhood Plan, Olney had signed up for growth – Olney’s Plan had to be in line with MK’s Plans, he said. Therefore, Olney was having 1500 houses and he couldn’t see any way to avoid it. Steve Clark invited Councillors to research a Bedfordshire development called The Wixams, where a very large number of houses were built on the basis the development would get its own railway station. People bought houses on that understanding yet, after 10 years or so, the station is not built, and no funding is available for it to be so. Peter Geary felt this a very good analogy re the Olney bypass. Jeremy Rawlings closed the meeting

    Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.

    Notice: Olney Town Council Reports
    If you wish to view past Mercury Reports on Olney Town Council Meetings you can use the following link which will take you to the last few years of meetings: www.phoneboxmagazine.com/Olney-Council-Reports These reports are created by our reporter, who covers the meetings and reflect what was heard at those meetings. Any parts of the meeting held in confidence we are not privy to, therefore cannot report on.



    Olney Council report for 6th April 2020

    Notice: Olney Town Council Reports
    If you wish to view past Mercury Reports on Olney Town Council Meetings you can use the following link which will take you to the last few years of meetings: www.phoneboxmagazine.com/Olney-Council-Reports These reports are created by our reporter, who covers the meetings and reflect what was heard at those meetings. Any parts of the meeting held in confidence we are not privy to, therefore cannot report on.

    Olney Town Council Meeting Letter re Virtual Meeting May 4th
    Olney Town Council will meet, virtually, on Monday 4 May at 7.30pm adopting Government advice that meetings can currently be conducted online. They will use the Teams App and unfortunately members of the public will be unable to attend. It is hoped that Mercury from the Phonebox will be able to attend and report on the meeting. Unfortunately the agenda has not yet been set but anyone who has an issue that they wish to bring to the attention of all councillors, can do so by emailing townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. The item will be read out at the meeting but, as in regular meetings, it will not be discussed if the item is not on the agenda. Any item submitted will be acknowledged after the meeting and if necessary discussed at a future meeting.  * One of the main items that will be on the agenda for the meeting is a discussion and response to the MK2050 paper put out by Milton Keynes Council. This can be found on mkfutures2050.com. It’s a long read but comments would be welcome.  * Olney Town Council would like to thank all its staff for continuing their sterling work during these interesting and difficult times.    Deirdre Bethune deirdrebethune@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk

    Olney Council report for May 2020 as reported in the June Edition

    Public participation
    Given current COVID-19 restrictions, Council meetings are now being held online. Anyone wishing to speak in the public participation section is asked to submit the text of their speech in advance, to be read during the meeting. Ian Stokes, Chair of the Olney Town Colts Football Club, was the only person to submit a speech. Given that the football season had finished two months short of its usual nine, the Club intends to reimburse parents’ subscriptions to reflect saved expenditure. Ian asked, therefore, if it would be possible for Olney Town Council (OTC) to reimburse the Colts for two ninths of its annual rental. He explained that the Colts is a non profit making club, run solely by volunteers to provide football for over 360 local boys and girls. Ian’s request was passed to the Recreations and Services Committee for consideration.

    Admin
    Pre COVID-19, Council meetings had to be held face-to-face, with everyone together in a room. A recent bill passed by Parliament allows the meetings to be held online but, if a Council wishes to do this, it must first vote to confirm its intention. Councillors voted in favour, so the meeting continued. Having approved the minutes of last month’s meeting, Councillors then had to vote on whether to agree postponing the Annual Meeting, the post-election meeting where committee chairs are agreed and Councillors take on their roles. That would have been tonight but, with the lack of an election and resulting changes in post, the meeting was no longer required. Councillors voted to postpone the meeting for a year, to May 2021.

    Milton Keynes Futures 2050
    As noted before, if you’re interested in the long term future of Milton Keynes, including Olney, head to www.mkfutures2050.com/ and read the draft strategy. This had been discussed, with some level of urgency but not as an agenda item, in the previous full OTC meeting, the strategy coming with a 17th April deadline for the Council to submit its views. That deadline had now been extended until 22nd May, and Chris Tenant had drafted a response, now in front of Councillors to agree. Chris introduced his draft response. MK Futures 2050 is currently a strategy paper, to guide Milton Keynes Council (MKC) towards a formal policy. It does not carry development plan weight. Thus, the cited figure of 1,500 new homes for Olney is a theoretical one. His response had been guided by two fundamental principles: First, infrastructure must come before expansion, second that decisions on land use issues must be conferred on to communities through their democratically approved Neighbourhood Plans. He felt the potential of the rapid transit network was very interesting, as was that for a Western bypass. He also felt it important to distinguish the handling of urban Milton Keynes from that of the rural hinterlands around it. All Councillors were in favour of Chris’s document. Peter Geary further noted that, when the world restarts in three to six months, MK Futures 2050 will continue but the needs which drive it may be different in the new, post-lockdown world. So, for example, it may be that its planners need to pause and start again. OTC will submit the document as its response to the MK Futures 2050 draft strategy.

    Exclusive Rights of Burial and Memorials
    This item was to discuss whether Exclusive Rights of Burial and Memorials should continue to have their regular place on the full OTC meeting agenda. Deirdre Bethune, in a minority from the start, felt they should continue to appear as a mark of respect – it was something people had come to expect, she said. Arguments against this point included that discussing Exclusive Rights of Burial may fall foul of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and that granting them was a job for the Proper Officer (Town Clerk, Andrea Vincent), requiring full Council attention only by exception. Councillors voted by majority in favour of removing them from the agenda, all in favour bar one against.

    Councillor Communications policy
    This item was to discuss the proposed policy for Councillor Communications. When Councillors express their views via press or social media, they must make it clear that these views are their own and not the Council’s. As with much of this part of the meeting, the devil was in the detail and the apparently innocuous proposed policy wording, “the Councillor is talking on behalf of him/herself as a Councillor and/or individual resident, and is not making comment on behalf of the Town Council as a whole,” provoked discussion. The point at issue here, first raised by Desmond Eley, was that as a Councillor, a person is always regarded as such and no longer as a normal resident. The wording must reflect this, he said. Sally Pezaro raised the following proposed wording, “When commenting on social media platforms Councillors, when using their title Councillor, must always ensure that every comment they make is followed or preceded by a statement such as ‘I am speaking as an individual councillor/individual resident and not on behalf of the Town Council.’ ” As a regular user of social media, including for her work, this could cause practical problems, she felt. After some discussion, the key here appeared to be to omit the ‘Councillor’ title from such posts, the rule not then applying. Andrea will seek advice on certain parts of this policy, amend and bring back to full Council for approval.

    Agenda and Minute policy
    This, similarly dry item, was to discuss the proposed policy for Agenda and Minutes. The Proper Officer (again, Town Clerk) has legal responsibility for determining what should appear on the agenda. Colin Rodden asked what would happen if a submitted item was refused – was there an appeals process? This raised the general concern that the Town Clerk may have to make decisions on controversial or difficult items. Andrea will look for some wording to provide guidance on what should and should not be allowed on agendas. The proposed wording notes that “Minutes of a meeting will include formal resolutions, proposers and, where applicable, seconders, as well as actions.“ Deirdre Bethune stated that it would be very sad if the minutes contained only resolutions and their proposers, omitting the discussions around them – they’d contain nothing of substance, she felt. Andrea noted that her training said that, while minutes should describe that there had been discussion around topics, they should focus on procedure and regulations. Deirdre felt OTC had previously had very good minutes which had told people all about the meetings, but guessed people could still rely on the Phonebox Magazine for that. Again, Andrea will seek advice on certain parts of this policy, amend and bring back to full Council for approval.

    Admission to Report Public Meetings policy
    Members of the Public are, of course, allowed and indeed encouraged to attend Council meetings. A new sub-section of the Openness of Local Government Bodies Regulations 2014 notes that any person attending meetings is also allowed to ‘report’ on them. Its definition of ‘report’ includes “filming, photographing or making an audio recording of proceedings.” Therefore, for GDPR purposes, it is necessary that people be informed that a recording may be taking place, giving them the opportunity to say if they don’t want themselves recorded, in which case content containing them will be removed.

    Profit and loss
    This section was to review the pre-reconciliation profit and loss figures for the year ending 31st March 2020. Summarising, the figures are slightly better than break-even, showing a small profit. In Paul Collins’ view, this vindicated last year’s precept increase, stemming an ongoing reduction in reserves. Given COVID-19, the future was unusually hard to predict, he said. For example, the Olney Centre’s income was currently reduced to zero. However, the situation would become clearer as more Government guidance, on grants for example, emerged. How would people behave as the lockdown eased – how soon would public confidence return?

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    The Human Resources Committee had proposed that a full time post be advertised for Olney Centre caretaker with ad hoc cleaning duties. This work is currently performed on a contracted basis, but the Committee considered it better value to employ a person to do it. It also proposed that a contract be advertised to cover the cleaning, opening and closing of the public toilets together with regular deep cleaning of the Olney Centre, along with cover for the caretaker while on leave. Andrea asked whether, before the Council office got into full swing making arrangements for Dickens of a Christmas, Council should consider a Glastonbury-style fallow year.  Deirdre noted that, as Chair of the Dickens of a Christmas Committee, it would have been nice to have been asked about this first. She felt the Council should “hold tight” for a couple of months on the basis that the event may be, by Christmas, something the town would really very much want. Deirdre then closed down the discussion, noting the topic “wasn’t important enough to ask the chair about.” In summary Dickens of a Christmas is going ahead, unless events dictate and Council decides otherwise.

    The Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held online at 7.30pm on Monday 1st June, live streamed from a set of spare bedrooms near you. If you’d like your views read out at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.



    Olney Council report for June 2020

    Public access to meetings
    For the duration of the COVID crisis meetings of Olney Town Council will be held as online audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by clicking on a link on the OTC web page www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk Click on the ‘Announcements’ tab and scroll down to the announcement about the next meeting where you will find a link to the agenda and another to join the meeting on listen only.  This meeting was rescheduled from a meeting due to take place a week earlier which was opened and adjourned due to several members being unable to join. There were still some ‘teething difficulties’ at this meeting with two members being unable to join the audio conversation but they were still able to participate in discussions and vote via the text comments. 

    Public participation
    A member of the public asked if the council would consider offering space om the Market Place to companies such as cafes that wished to have outside space for tables and chairs because their premises were unsuitable for maintaining social distancing. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings reminded members that this had been discussed before, but no agreement had been reached as to how it might be implemented. Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that MKC had made a fund of £230k available to ‘restart the High Street’ and Olney might be eligible to apply for up to £30k. The fund is intended to pay for hire of consultants and equipment etc, so he suggested that Town Clerk Andrea Vincent investigates. Steve Clark supported the idea in principle but asked what would happen if demand outstrips supply? It would be unfair to offer space to some businesses but not others, particularly as it was possible that pubs would be open first and may request space so OTC would have to be very careful how they allocated space. It was agreed that Jeremy and Andrea would manage the process between them without reference to the full council or Recs and Services committee.

    Agenda and Minute policy
    This subject was discussed at length at last month’s meeting and there now appears to be a much more formal approach to what may and may not be discussed. There was certainly a drive to stick strictly to the agenda from some members at the meeting. Last month it was agreed by a majority that Exclusive Rights of Burial and Memorials should be removed as an agenda item. It appears that Members Matters has also gone, which was an opportunity for councillors to raise issues of their own or that had been communicated to them by members of the public. Councillors must now apply to the Town Clerk for any such items to be placed on the formal agenda and she will decide if it is appropriate. Mercury assumes that this is to enable a more efficient running of meetings in the current situation.

    Town Clerk's Report
    Andrea Vincent said she and Deputy Clerk had done a great deal of work with Paul Collins, Chair of Finance, to bring the budget up to date and be ready to speak to the Auditor later this month to enable the Annual Governance and Accountability Return to be completed and signed off. She expressed concern about the forthcoming year as income would be significantly reduced due to lack of income from the Olney Centre hire and reduced market stalls. Finance was a separate agenda item later in the meeting when the schedule of payments for the month of May showed a net loss of £14k since the majority of outgoings were still necessary but there was considerable loss of income. Paul Collins pointed out that precept (the portion of MKC Council Tax which is paid to OTC for services) needed to be included to give an indication of the true state of finances. Local councils are being doubly penalised he said, because unlike private businesses they are unable to claim a Business Rate holiday but as precepting authorities they are unable to claiming the retail, hospitality or leisure grant from central government. The Finance Committee have not met since setting the budget and Schedule of Charges for 2021 and it was likely that that budget would need ‘throwing out of the window’ and be completely revised, he said.   There appears to have been a misunderstanding amongst some councillors that they have a ‘Line Management’ role over the council workforce. Andrea stated that this was definitely NOT the case and all requests for work must come via the council office. A member of staff had left during the month, and Andrea wished him well. A show of appreciation was presented in the form of a few gifts and an afternoon tea. For Information: Richard Mynard was the member of staff in question and had been a Groundsman since 1984. The vacant post has now been advertised.

    unknown

    In addition to the Groundsman vacancy there is also a vacancy for a part time Caretaker. Detailed job descriptions have been produced and the caretaker post will also be advertised in due course. A spec has been created for the cleaning of the Olney centre which will be put out to tender and a contract will be created by the successful applicant.  A COVID 19 plan for the council has been produced and is constantly evolving. The purpose is to ensure that OTC can reduce the impact of potential infection from Coronavirus and/or continue to function in the case of absence due to illness, self-isolation. Olney Centre, council compound and cemetery closures are included in the plan. It will ensure the safe re opening of services and the running of council business. Peter Geary noted that Olney, along with many other communities, had set up COVID support Groups and they had done a really good job. All groups had had to move quickly to understand what is required. At one point the Olney group were providing support to approximately 120 households with around 280 volunteers. That need was now easing up but could be required again in the future. Jeremy Rawlings said it would be useful if the group could provide a written report detailing what they had achieved and what they felt their strengths and weaknesses were. Andrea reported that there had been many complaints to the council about large groups congregating by the bathing steps, and the ‘detritus’ that was then left. The grass had been scorched by portable BBQs and a number of patches will need to be reseeded. There had also been complaints of dogs running rampant, she said. It had not been helped by the re-running of articles in two national newspapers advertising the area as ideal for wild water swimming. Steve Clark noted that the area was referred to in some quarters as a ‘Victorian swimming pool’ and the council should actively avoid using the phrase and discourage others to do the same. He noted that Google Maps was guilty of this and despite representations from several local people, had still not removed it. Signage will be provided in attempt to resolve some of the problems, but Andrea was uncertain how effective that would be, particularly as most visitors were thought not to be local. Joanne Eley said there was a public health concern which the council could not ignore due to the huge amount of human excrement that had been left in the ditches and around the various sports clubs. Where public toilets remain closed the government guidelines are to bag it and take it home, she said. Peter Geary suggested contacting the Environment Health Department at MKC for advice.

    Rugby Club Planning Applications
    Jeremy Rawlings noted that OTRFC has submitted plans for three separate developments. The first is for an extension to the clubhouse to provide two unisex changing rooms on land which is owned by OTC, the second is for a new car park with 48 car parking spaces plus 2 coach spaces on part of Doff’s Field which is owned by the club, and the third is for a fifty seat stand also on Doff’s Field. OTC is not a planning authority and does not decide on such applications but may submit recommendations to MKC via their own Planning subcommittee. Jeremy suggested that individual members of the council could submit comments via the MKC planning portal, along with members of the public. Steve Clark, as chairman of the subcommittee suggested members submit comments to him but Malcolm Messenger was of the opinion that a planning meeting should be held since it would have a big impact on residents of Austin Avenue and Mobbs Way. There is also a public footpath running across the land proposed for the car park, he said, and there had been considerable debate, both for and against, on Facebook. Joanne Eley expressed concern that pedestrians would be walking through a car park which comes out on a blind bend. It was agreed to hold a planning meeting the following week to discuss all three applications. 

    OTC office hardware
    The hardware used by the Clerk and Deputy Clerk is now well past its prime and is to be replaced. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings handed over the chair to Steve Clark at this point as his company is one of those that had tendered for the work. The cost for two workstations, two docking stations and four monitors was quoted as around £3.2k with three years warranty from both suppliers but was available from Amazon for £2.9k with one year warranty. Paul Collins proposed that the equipment be purchased from Amazon which was passed unanimously with one abstention.

    Dickens of a Christmas
    Following on from last month’s discussion about whether to declare a Glastonbury style ’fallow’ year Jeremy Rawlings proposed that planning should continue, subject to government rules and regulations at the time and should be in the form of a very much cut-down version with a final decision being made in September. The Lions are very keen that it should go ahead, if at all possible, as it is one of their major fund-raisers and their income has seen a considerable reduction due to Covid. Peter Geary suggested that planning should continue until financial outlay was necessary and the final decision left to the organising committee, which was agreed. Andrea Rawlings said the office was already receiving many enquiries from ‘out of town’ traders and guidance was need as to whether they should plan for a full-scale or cut-down event. As Chairman of The Dickens Committee Deirdre Bethune supported holding a smaller event for local traders, which would reduce a lot of the workload for the office, with the Lions free to organise the craft fairs within whatever regulations exist at the time. Joanne Eley said that with social distancing rules still likely to be in place it was only fair to allow local shops who have had a bad year to have stalls in the road around the Market Place. It was agreed to plan for a smaller scale local event and make a final decision in September based on the regulations in place at that time.

    unknown

    Odds and Sods
    An audit of the allotments has taken place. In ‘normal’ times anyone not maintaining their allotment could lose it, but the council recognise that some holders are currently able to do so and will not be penalised. Desmond Eley reported that allotment holders had assisted the council in filling in some of the holes in the roadways and expressed his thanks.   As of the beginning of June market traders selling non-essential goods have been invited back to the Thursday and Sunday markets, which have been well supported by the public. The Recs and Services Committee of OTC have discussed permanent closure of all but the disabled public toilets on the Market Place (which are currently closed), except to market traders. This would be dependant of alternatives being available and discussions will be held with businesses around the Market Place to see if they would be prepared to open their facilities to non-customers, as happens in many other towns.

    The Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held online at 7.30pm on Monday 6th July, live streamed for members of the public to observe proceedings. If you have any issue which you would like read out at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk This replaces the previous public participation agenda item.



    Olney Council report for 6th July 2020 - On Line - In August's edition

    Public access to meetings - www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk - Announcements
    For the duration of the COVID restrictions, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be held online using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by surfing to www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, clicking the ‘Announcements’ menu and scrolling down to the announcement about the next meeting, where there’s a link to the agenda and another to join the meeting listen-only.

    Public participation
    Market Place proposal: A retailer on the Market Place was first to have her contribution read by Andrea Vincent, Town Clerk. Noting her awareness that a proposal to use some areas of the Market Place car park for seating had been discussed and rejected by OTC, due mainly to parking, antisocial behaviour and litter concerns, she wanted to express her and the majority of small retailers’ thanks for this. She was pleased the Council had listened to them. She continued that, if it wished to support the small businesses further, they’d prefer the Council to contact them directly rather than through a third party. Noting that Olney has a successful and attractive High Street and Market Place, she felt the lockdown had pressured many businesses, leaving some worried about their ability to survive. If help were available, they’d be very happy to work with the Council, she said. She concluded by thanking Councillors for their help with the situation on the Recreation Ground and bathing areas. A Timpsons Row resident had also been in contact, this time concerning the increased number of visitors to the Recreation Ground in recent weeks. They went on to share some incidents they’d seen, in the hope the information would be useful. The main issue in Timpsons Row was parking, it seeing typically 50 additional vehicles on warm days, obstructing pedestrians and traffi c. Noting that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) is responsible for parking in Olney, they encouraged OTC to work with MKC to take a firm stance on the issue – more restrictions and enforcement. Stating that most visitors to the Recreation Ground have to drive, they felt restricting parking would thus restrict visitor numbers – the issue wasn’t with people visiting the Recreation Ground, it was with their sheer number. Noting the nearby gate to the field and inadequate parking-related signage in the Row, they felt closing the gate during the Summer may help. Examples of antisocial behaviour have included residents being sworn at and threatened with violence, and a woman walking down the side of a house to change out of her swimming costume before getting in her car. A mass brawl was also noted, resulting in people walking past covered in blood. They asked residents, the Police, OTC and MKC to work together to devise solutions – else the situation would worsen each year. They concluded by thanking OTC for its work keeping the town in such wonderful condition.  Closing the Public Toilets: Last in this section, another contributor noted the consequences of OTC closing the public toilets during lockdown. This was without legal requirement, they said, toilets in many neighbouring towns remaining open. It had led to antisocial behaviour with people urinating and defecating on the Recreation Ground, outside commercial premises and in alleyways. This was a health and safety issue, and the lack of open toilets had put people off visiting the town, particularly the young, elderly and disabled. Given COVID, commercial premises were understandably reluctant to let the public use their facilities, they felt. They asked the Council to open and regularly clean the public toilets. They also noted that the Government had congratulated towns which had kept their toilets open, urging those who had not to reopen them safely. Andrea concluded this section, noting that OTC was following Government guidance to reopen the toilets, with the significant cost implications entailed.

    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Debbie Whitworth had sent her apologies. No declarations of interest were made.

    Approving the previous meeting’s minutes
    Colin Rodden asked whether the Council had talked about the public toilets being closed, as he couldn’t recall it, particularly given the noted possibility of permanent closure.  Jeremy Rawlings replied that the idea of retailers opening their facilities for the public, as happens in some other towns, had been discussed. That discussion had been started as it raised the possibility that the maintenance, management and refurbishment of the public toilets would not need to take place.  Desmond Eley noted that, pre COVID, a working group had been created to look into the remodelling of the Market Place, necessarily including consideration of the public toilets. The choices were to remodel, extend or close, retaining just the disabled facility and that for the market traders. The decision process is ongoing, pending the group gleaning the information required to make it.  Deirdre Bethune noted she didn’t feel it sensible currently to talk with retailers about opening their toilets.  The decision is on hold pending a clearer way forward with COVID.

    Town Clerk’s report
    Faster Internet Connection: OTC has engaged BT in order to achieve a faster internet connection and IP-based phones.  Jeremy noted that, in his professional opinion, he’d not touch BT with a barge pole, and agreed to talk later with Andrea.  Amazon Offer Expired:  The Amazon offer for new OTC office hardware that the previous meeting agreed to purchase was time limited and now expired.  Quotes from a third local supplier will be obtained, and the three brought to Council for a decision.  Olney Centre Income required: Noting the need for the Olney Centre to restart generating income, Desmond Eley mentioned that Room 2, normally used for marriages, was currently occupied by the Olney COVID Support Group’s equipment. The Council had asked it how much longer, but not yet received a response.  Jeremy will pursue this noting, at Graham Harrison’s suggestion, that the Council would need the full building in the near future.  Andrea noted the incredibly hard work of Council staff during the COVID restrictions. They had received a large number of criticisms, mainly about the situation with the Recreation Ground, but also some thanks. She thanked the team, a sentiment echoed strongly by Jeremy. The litter issues, he explained, were due to the amount being discarded. Anti-Letter Signage: The Council had devoted the resources to clear it up. Councillors discussed whether providing more anti-litter signage on the Recreation Ground would help, Deirdre thinking it would. Although no consensus was reached, the weight of opinion appeared to be that it would not.  Andrea noted that, even when the local Lions group had handed out bin bags to groups of people on the Recreation Ground, they had often not been filled. Joanne Eley noted that some of the unsung heroes in this episode were the Olney and Clifton Reynes Fishing association, working hard to clear up litter from the riverbank. Graham noted that this was a country-wide problem, not affecting just Olney. Jeremy explained that, although the “alcohol exclusion zone” signs were widely ignored, they gave the Police authority to act. Deirdre noted she may provide anti-litter signs at her own expense.

    Recreations and Services
    Recreation Ground Issues A multi-agency meeting had been held to discuss the issues on the Recreation Ground. Desmond explained what happened, the following is a brief summary: The mass gathering issue did not start with COVID, instead having grown over the last three or so years, fuelled in part by mainstream and social media. The option of closing the East Street car park or charging an admission fee was discussed and its many downsides noted, for example the logistics of charging a fee, and the impact on parking elsewhere including the effect on emergency services vehicle access. This was left with OTC to decide on and manage.  The public toilets should be opened as soon as practically possible. Thames Valley Police is pleased with the recently installed “alcohol exclusion zone” signs. Fencing could be installed to funnel visitors to discourage walking across sports pitches. OTC has lost all its income streams due to COVID and, in spite of multiple requests, no funding or grants had been made available to help it tackle these problems. A key safe will be provided to allow emergency services vehicle access from East Street.  The ensuing discussion was lengthy and, again, the following a brief summary: Deirdre asked Desmond to clarify the statement on fencing. The aim, he explained, was to funnel people entering the Recreation Ground from beside and behind the Rugby Club to walk between the Bowls Club and the MUGA, entering the Ground near the toilet block. That way, they’d be more likely to avoid the sports pitches, particularly the cricket pitch which had seen people walk across even while cricket was being played. Footpath locations and byelaws were discussed, as was the fact that OTC hires out the pitches to the clubs, which then expect a facility on which they can play sport safely.  Colin Rodden asked how decisions were being made, particularly on the fencing and signage. Desmond explained that no money had been spent without committee approval, and Jeremy Rawlings that in these difficult times decisions had to be taken quickly.  Jeremy asked Colin if he was happy with this, his immediate response being silence, and later one that more consultation was required.  East Street Car Park: Re the East Street car park, Peter Geary outlined three options: First, continue as now – people turn up in whatever numbers, the Council attempts to manage the paths they take to the river, clears up after them and stomachs the costs. Second, try to dissuade people at all costs – for example lock the East Street car park, but that would disrupt visiting teams and displace parking. Third, charge for the East Street car park to help mitigate the money spent by the Council – but the logistics and inconvenience for legitimate users would be significant. None is a perfect solution, but people expect OTC to do something, even if that’s the first option. It is public open space, and we cannot stop people from accessing it, he said. There are no easy solutions although, as lockdown continues to ease, people will at least have more choice of places to visit.  Skipping much of the discussion, the Council set up a small working group to look at charging for the East Street car park in peak season. Deirdre asked that the group keep all Councillors up to date, because that didn’t always happen. It was noted that, while there was insufficient time to make this decision in the very short term, it will not be straightforward to make in the long term either. For example, a permit holder scheme would help residents but be less obviously beneficial for sports match away teams.  David Coles’ open letter, as published in last month’s Phonebox, was also noted for Council consideration. This section concluded with Desmond asking Deirdre about her earlier comment re working groups not reporting back to the Council. He asked which working group Deirdre thought hadn’t reported back. She did not respond.
    Opening up the High Street
    This item noted the reasons the proposal to use some of the Market Place car park for seating was rejected. These were that, in spite of sending a letter to each shop nearby, no responses at all were received, and that the Police thought the idea “madness” and would attract antisocial behaviour.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    The Council had received three quotes for Autumn and Winter bedding plants, accepting Alban Hill Nurseries’. It will also seek quotes for a new mower for the Cemetery. Desmond reported that, in the second half of May, there appeared to have been a significant and sudden drop in the Council’s store of red diesel. Measures have been taken to ensure control and monitoring of the store, with others pending if agreed.

    Allotment Association Agreement
    Desmond noted that, as reported previously, the Recreations and Services Committee had been discussing the formation of a service agreement with the Allotment Association, expected to move forward in October subject to agreement. This had been done informally so far, but formalising the group of Councillors involved as a working group with authority to make decisions would be appropriate to continue this work.

    Finance
    Paul Collins provided a broad overview of the Council’s finances given COVID.  His major area of concern was the current reduced income from the markets and Olney Centre room hire. He noted that many of the room hirers have memberships skewed towards the at-risk age groups, meaning the drop in income could be relatively long term. In the three months to 30th June, these sources of income were down £9,500 compared with a year ago.  Unlike commercial businesses and non-profits, the Council had not been eligible for business rates relief or the Retail, Hospitality, and Leisure Grant – almost singled out for special, unfair treatment he felt. Further, none of the extra money paid by Government to higher-tier Local Authorities appeared to have trickled down to Parish Council level. Hopefully, this would change. In terms of expenditure, OTC had been mindful of the need to make significant savings, and thus expenditure for this financial year is more than £30,000 below that a year ago.  However, this level of saving would not be maintained once the Olney Centre was reopened. He hoped that, by October, the Council would have a clearer view of how things will turn out. He also noted the costs of the antisocial behaviour on the Recreation Ground, and of the enhanced public toilet cleaning regime. Andrea noted that cleaning both sets of toilets will cost £700 - £1,000 per weekDesmond raised the opportunity to promote Room 2 of the Olney Centre for marriages, noting the potential logjam for such events – it was important to know what was happening with that room. Jeremy will further ask the COVID Support Group about its plans. Although feeling that marriage bookings may not pick up until next year, Steve Clark agreed that OTC should indeed aggressively market use of the Centre for marriages. Deirdre asked about the state of the Recreation Ground toilets. These had been vandalised seriously pre COVID and, while that had delayed their repair, it would happen shortly.

    Olney Development Group
    Chris Tennant reported that a review of Olney’s existing Neighbourhood Plan had started. He then ran through the local development sites, of which just the residential ones are covered here.  On Site A, Lavendon Road, work had started on the building of 50 homes.  On Site B, Warrington Road, outline permission had been granted.  As for Site C, off Osiers Road adjacent to the business park, while not allocated for housing the construction of 66 homes was in progress.  On Sites D&E, off Aspreys and Yardley Road, very large scale archaeological site investigations had started. The reserved matters planning application for the 250 homes on those sites is live and out for consultation, with further drawings and reports received. OTC had objected to this application and asked for it to be considered by the MKC Development Control Committee. Chris noted issues with MKC Planning Department not necessarily consulting with members of the public and Councillors, something it is now reviewing. He felt this an effect of lockdown.  At Site R, the Sainsbury’s store is open but the planning application by Angle Properties and McCarthey & Stone, for sheltered and retirement living on the remaining land had, contrary to the Neighbourhood Plan, been allowed on appeal.  Jeremy noted that the Sites D&E reserved matters application contained significant changes. Chris agreed noting that, of most concern, a significant proportion of the promised public open space had since been extracted, no longer forming part of sites’ D&E delivery, never envisaged in the Neighbourhood Plan. Chris felt the MKC Chief Planner at the time, who’d since moved on, had perhaps dropped the ball in that regard by allowing this change as part of the Section 106 agreement. Essentially, the town was being held to ransom on a future development option North of Site E. He felt it important to note that OTC was unhappy with this situation – we can’t have part of a playing pitch delivered, where OTC hasn’t considered a future planning application on a site outside the settlement boundary. Other issues include access: The original land promoter did not own the land strip which could provide access from Aspreys so, while MKC and OTC were previously keen to pursue that access, it was not in the promoter’s gift to offer. However, the strip is owned by the chosen developer, Vistry (ex Bovis), meaning that it could, if it chose, deliver that access. Finally, the reserved matters application includes some three storey apartment blocks, never originally envisaged. It was already the highest site in Olney in topographical terms. He felt this change perhaps a little disingenuous. Peter Geary, agreeing with much of Chris’s description and noting it pretty disappointing, expressed confidence in the current MKC Planning Offi cer. Re the issues with the playing field, he felt these were known about before and were one of the reasons he was against the outline application. This was not exactly in the spirit of things, and he felt Chris was right about the current situation. Desmond asked Chris whether, given the recent building work, there were any Section 106 monies which OTC could draw down, with a view to accessing funds to spend around the town. Chris will look into this. 

    The Next Meeting
    The next council meeting will be held on Monday 7th September, at 7.00pm if online else 7.30pm if in the Council Chamber. If you’d like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.


    Discussion to decide if the Public toilets should be reopened (Held online on Monday 20th July.

    An extraordinary meeting of Olney Town Council (OTC) was held online, Monday 20th July, to discuss reopening the Market Place and Recreation Ground public toilets, closed since lockdown. Apologies for absence were received from Chris Tenant. No declarations of interest were made. Jeremy Rawlings reported that, as part of the ‘Olney is Open’ initiative, delegated to himself and Andrea Vincent (Town Clark), the Council had sought and received two tenders for ongoing cleaning of the toilets and, under those delegated powers, chosen the cheapest. It was, however, very expensive and raised concern from a number of other Councillors about the ongoing cost and whether OTC should bear it for the sake of reopening, so he organised this meeting in response.  He noted that the retailers, and Thursday and Sunday Market stallholders were keen for the toilets to open, a sentiment matched by the general consensus of an all-comers meeting at the Rugby Club. The ongoing cost involved was indeed significant at around £700 per week, equating to around £3,000 per month, for the duration of the pandemic, itself an unknown quantity. It would allow the toilets to open 8am – 5pm, closing three-hourly for cleans at 11am, 2pm and 5pm, that being the period specified by the Council’s insurers for COVID-19 infection control. The cleaning, using bleach or equivalent, would include all surfaces around the toilets and sinks, internal surfaces and floors, and all the touch points - door handles, etc. The contract could be stopped by OTC at short notice. Colin Rodden suggested obtaining sponsorship, but this would be hard in the current climate.  Malcolm Messenger suggested employing someone to do the work, but that would incur start-up costs and come with commitments.  Desmond Eley felt sorry for OTC’s staff, working harder for less pay than this, and that the tender was not good value.  Graham Harrison asked for the cost if just the Market Place toilets were reopened, Andrea replying it’d be half, and Deidre Bethune that the Recreation Ground toilets were also important given recent complaints.  Joanne Eley noted the earlier than usual closing time for the Recreation Ground toilets – what were people meant to do after 5pm? Paul Collins, chair of the Finance Committee, reported that OTC had seen a significant reduction in income and, to date, received no Government or Milton Keynes Council (MKC) money due to COVID-19. Having started to get the Council’s finances under control and set a budget for the year, this toilet cleaning alone would add £18 per year to the average home’s Council Tax precept. He felt the toilets wouldn’t be used much and that the Council could not afford this cost. He strongly opposed the idea of reopening. Peter Geary, noting this a difficult decision, proposed reopening both toilets pending a review at the next full Council meeting on 7th September.  This proposal, amended to first wait for upcoming advice from the National Association of Local Councils (NALC) and a final positive discussion with the Council’s insurers, appeared to receive a consensus. It would result in a cost of around £5,000, and the responsibility for taking the decision to reopen was delegated to JeremyDesmond and Andrea. In the meantime, the Council will continue trying to extract funding from MKC and Government. It will write to our local MP, stating it was under the impression that some funding would be available for this purpose and, unless some came forward, it would not be able to keep the toilets open. Also, it will attempt to gauge opinions in the town with a Facebook poll, notices and a Phonebox article. Jeremy Rawlings concluded the meeting, thanking Councillors for their input and for reaching a consensus.



    Town Council Controversy from the August Meeting (Reported in the September 2020 issue)

    Intimidation Resignation & Regret
    August is usually a month Olney Town Council do not have a meeting. With all that is going on at the moment a special meeting was called to discuss some recent problems, especially the Public Toilets in the Town. This meeting turned out to be a bit more lively that unusual, and caused the resignation of two councillors, following hard on the heels of a third councillor making a total of four resignations since February, and six in the last 15 months!

    unknown

    Public Access to Meetings
    For the duration of the COVID crisis meetings of Olney Town Council will be held as online audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by clicking on a link on the OTC web page www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk Click on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scroll down to the announcement about the next meeting where you will find a link to the agenda and another to join the meeting on listen-only. 

    Preamble
    There is not normally a meeting of OTC in August but as there were a number of issues to be discussed this meeting was called at short notice by the Clerk Andrea Vincent and Mayor Jeremy Rawlings in the light of ‘a rapidly changing situation’. 
    Deirdre Bethune asked why the minutes of the July meeting stated that an August meeting would be held when at that stage none was planned. Andrea said she had amended the draft minutes for the July meeting the day before. This was picked up under matters arising from the minutes of the previous meeting and the amendment removed.

    Public Participation
    In the absence of the opportunity to speak at public meetings, the public may submit written items to the clerk to be read out. Mercury would normally name those who speak at an open meeting, unless they specifically ask not to be identified. Under the new regime, the clerk redacts the names from any correspondence under alleged GDPR rules, so there exists the situation whereby councillors and public are not permitted to know who has submitted the written items. Note: If any member of the public wishes to be identified as the originator of correspondence to the council, they should state that in the letter/email to overcome any GDPR constraints.  This month there was an email from a person who owns a business but does not currently live in Olney, but in a neighbouring village. This person said they wholeheartedly supported Deirdre Bethune’s proposal to use the Sidney Dix Community fund (or any other funding source) to enable the public toilets on the Market Place and Recreation ground to remain open, as they are an asset to the town. (This was the subject of a later agenda item). A town meeting should be called before any decision is taken, they said. David Pibworth has contacted The Phonebox and asked to be identified as the author of this email. Another resident had also emailed to ask that the final decision on the toilets should be made by the public in the name of good governance, transparency, and democracy. The final decision should be delayed till after the May 2021 election with candidates declaring how they would act on the issue, this person believed. Kevin Viney has contacted The Phonebox and asked to be identified as the author of this email. Regarding the first email, Malcolm Messenger questioned Deirdre as to how a person living outside the town could know that she was going to present her proposal at the meeting. Deirdre explained that this person was ‘very local’, having interests and working in the town and her (Deirdre’s) intentions were public knowledge. Malcolm proceeded to press her very strongly, asking who had told this person. Deirdre explained that it was on the published meeting agenda which was in the public domain. Malcolm asked Andrea on what date the email had been received to which she replied that it was the date that the agenda had been published. A letter had also been received from Trevor York on behalf of Friends of Cobbs Garden Surgery, which donates over £2000 per month for health-related projects, equipment and services. A book of photographs of Olney over the years is being proposed as a fund-raiser, and Trevor asked if any colour photos in the possession of OTC could be included. It was agreed that OTC would loan any photos in its possession for the project.

    Apologies for Absence & Declarations of Interest
    There were no apologies for absence or declarations of interest. Jeremy reported that Debbie Whitworth had formally tendered her resignation, would not be joining the meeting and was no longer a councillor. Deirdre Bethune asked if a reason could be given. Jeremy declined to give one, but said Deirdre could ask Debbie if she wished. Deirdre replied that the public would really like to know why Debbie had resigned. Jeremy replied that it was up to Debbie to inform the public, not him. Deirdre suggested that perhaps the town Clerk would like to provide input as well, saying that Debbie had been considerably upset all weekend and did they care? She hoped the public were listening, she said.  Jeremy said Debbie had tendered her resignation and he had accepted it. Joanne Eley asked Jeremy to move on, saying that quite clearly there are reasons which are well documented in emails, and this was not a ‘show-boating exercise’. Jeremy closed the conversation by saying that if ex-councillor Whitworth wishes to make a public statement, then that is her prerogative, bearing in mind that whatever she says is still covered in part by the code of conduct.

    Proposed Reopening of The Olney Centre
    Andrea reported that the organisations that were previously regular users of the Olney Centre had been contacted asking when they wished to resume bookings. Not all had replied, but six that meet monthly had indicated that they wished to return in September. None of the weekly groups had provided a date, mainly because their members were previously in the shielding category and are not yet willing to commit.  Age UK previously held a lunch club once a week but were currently looking to only commence operations at the Peartree Bridge Centre from October and asked if the council could assist with travel expenses for users. If the Olney centre were to open it would need to be done with a caretaker and cleaning contract in place, but the council would need to consider the shortfall of income, Andrea said. Perhaps as a public body, OTC should consider reopening as a sign of the ‘bouncing back of the High Street, etc’? Jeremy asked what would be the cost vs income of opening in September? Andrea replied that each booking would provide in the region of £70, but outgoings would be considerably more. Colin Rodden asked how this would impact on the reopening of the library, which was not in Phase 1 of Milton Keynes Council’s (MKC) plans. Jeremy said that the library could open independently as MKC had their own cleaning contract. Graham Harrison said it was a ‘chicken and egg’ situation because if people saw the building open, they might come, but he would not like to see the building open before October. However, if an intended opening date were published, maybe more people would consider using it. Jeremy said much was dependant of the oft-hinted Second Wave. As Chair of Finance, Paul Collins suggested waiting till the September meeting when a proper cashflow could be provided. If a caretaker is employed, it is not easy to ‘turn the tap off’, he said, and the current budget was based on a pre-Covid expectation of £34K in room hire income. The current income this financial year is £900, so there are considerable financial implications he said. The £900 is from pre-bookings which may yet be refunded in the future, he explained. It was agreed to review the situation at the September meeting.

    Building Works for OTC Office
    As chair of the Olney Centre Management Committee Deirdre Bethune presented a proposal for changes to the OTC office, for which planning approval had been granted and had previously been discussed by the council. It would make for far greater safety when the Clerk or Deputy when working alone as the door could be locked and it would still be possible to communicate with the public through a hatch, which would make it easier to be Covid compliant, too.  It would create more usable space whilst distancing the clerks without having to make other changes to the existing arrangements. She’d hoped that it could be financed by a Covid grant, but the clerk had advised that this was not possible. It is, however, possible to take out public works loans which attract very little interest. The work could be done while the centre is currently closed, she said.  Joanne Eley said that in this uncertain time and without a cashflow she didn’t think that OTC should be taking out a loan at all, since the council could easily function with the current configuration. The council and residents should not be put into debt for a ‘nice to do’ she thought, since the duration of Covid is unknown, and the council currently has no income. Deirdre interjected to say she believed the work to be essential. Joanne continued that she would like to see the Management Committee produce a clearly thought out evidence-based plan on how it could be funded without taking out a loan.  Graham Harrison said he was astonished that the council could even think about spending £15k on the work but then tell residents that there was no money for anything else. It was just a ‘non-starter’ he thought.  Jeremy said he agreed that at this time the expenditure was inappropriate. Malcolm Messenger was of the view that when and if the centre opens Covid distancing could be provided with the use of a screen, and the door could be closed when privacy was necessary. Desmond Eley asked Andrea if she thought the changes were necessary to perform her duties. Andrea replied that there was already a reasonable plan to make the office Covid safe, so it wasn’t immediately necessary, but at some time in the future it was essential that changes were made to improve disabled access. Additional space could be found by moving some documentation into storage, she felt.  Colin Rodden expressed the view that keeping the office staff safe should be a priority, so as the Covid situation improves then anything that could be done to provide a better working environment would be helpful. Jeremy asked for a seconder for Deirdre’sproposal, and Colin Rodden declared himself prepared to second it. However, he then declined to vote in favour, saying he wanted more information. Joanne Eley interjected to say that it was not legitimate for a member to second a motion that he or she was not in favour of, but Peter Geary said it was a perfectly legitimate situation, which Joanne thought ‘crazy’. Deirdre said that there was obviously no support for the proposal and withdrew it. Jeremy said that the situation would be reviewed in the future as there may well be ways of resolving the issues without spending £15k.

    Use of The ‘Sidney Dix’ Community Support Fund to Support the Continued Opening of Public Toilets
    unknown

    Full details of the rules for this fund may be found on the OTC web site but to summarise:  The OTC Community Support Fund (previously known as the Sidney Dix Fund, after a local benefactor) exists to provide financial support for voluntary and community groups in the Parish. Grants will only be awarded for applications that promote or improve the economic, social, or environmental well-being of their area, and to organisations based within the Parish. Grants are normally only given for items of a capital nature which will have an ongoing benefit to residents of the town, although in exceptional circumstances other awards may be made. Deirdre Bethune put forward a proposal that under these exceptional circumstances it would be justified to use the fund to keep the toilets open for this year, providing a much-needed service for the town, which would avoid using funds from the Council Tax Precept. With many visitors to the town, including those to the museum for the forthcoming Amazing Grace celebrations, it was essential that public toilets were available. Those visitors will also be supporting businesses in the town. The high expense of keeping the toilets open seemed to be based on employing the services of a limited company with all the associated overheads, she said, and asked why it was not possible to employ an individual at a cheaper rate.  The decision was made by the HR Committee, the workings of which are not divulged to other council members, she said. Paul Collins said whether the toilets were open or not was not a big factor with regards to the museum, because most visitors are in large parties who then go to a restaurant to use their facilities, plus the Amazing Grace celebrations will not be taking place for two years.  He went on to say that because the Community Support fund is a ‘restricted fund’ the money therein cannot be transferred to other funds and cannot be used for purposes other than those stated. The philanthropist that set it up did so with the intention of providing modest grants to community groups. By no stretch of the imagination is OTC a community group and it is not legitimate to use the fund to meet OTC overhead costs, he said. He reminded councillors that on 28th April 2011 the councillor making the proposal reported to the annual town public meeting that the Sidney Dix Fund would shortly be renamed the OTC Community Fund and that its purpose would remain unchanged. It is a totally invalid proposal, he said. Deirdre replied saying she thought the community of Olney would like to be able to go to the toilet as part of their recreation, so it would be a justified use of the community fund.  Joanne Eley interjected to say that the proposal was against the council’s Community Grant Policy to which Jeremy agreed. Desmond Eley then read a statement explaining how the current situation had arisen. To summarise, he said pre-Covid the council recognised that a number of issues need to be resolved regarding the Market Place and the state of the toilets was one of them. A working group identified that the cost of refurbishment would be between £30k and £60k, depending on the solution chosen. The Recs and Services committee was informed by some members of the public – complete strangers unknown to the council, he said – that residents didn’t like or use the toilets, would not like to see that amount of money spent on the toilets and felt there must be better uses for the money. It was then suggested by ‘a councillor’ that the toilets be closed, with the exception of the disabled toilets, and only used on market and event days. Deirdre was actioned to ask retailers around the Market Place if they would be prepared to let the public use their facilities, but Covid meant this could not be completed. A meeting of the recreation ground Joint User Adjourned Group and others resolved that the then closed Market Place and Rec toilets should be opened as soon as possible.  This was reported back to the council which resolved to reopen them at a cost, established Adjourned by the clerk, of £38k per year. Because of the high cost, this would be reviewed at the September OTC meeting. An Internet Poll would be created to gauge public opinion. He finished by saying that in his opinion, the use of the Community Support Fund was inappropriate. Jeremy Rawlings said at no point had OTC talked about permanently closing the toilets. The temporary closure was due to Covid, and they were now open again with additional costs in the region of £700 per week. The decision to be made at the September meeting would be whether OTC would be prepared to continue with that funding. To use the Sidney Dix fund would be an abhorrence and absolutely disgraceful, he thought Peter Geary asked how much cash was currently in the fund (a figure of £35k was quoted) and what was the result of the poll which appeared briefly on the OTC and Olney Noticeboard Facebook pages? He suggested the final decision be delayed in order to give sufficient time to look at the conditions of the Community Support Fund, noting that after a year the fund would be exhausted and suggested that the agenda item should be adjourned.  Malcolm Messenger said that the poll was not a true vote as some respondents lived in New ZealandNorfolk, and Scotland. It should be a ‘paper vote’ to all households that pay the precept, he said. Jeremy said he agreed and wasn’t happy about the poll being posted. Deirdre asked where the figure of £18 per household came from. At this point, Joanne Eley interjected to say that the item under discussion was whether to use the Community Support Fund, not the finances and the proposal should have contained that information.  Deirdre responded by saying that the figure of £18 had not be made available until the poll went up. The following conversation was indecipherable with many people talking over each other, and Jeremy called the meeting to order. Colin Rodden felt that the council needed to understand how many people use both lots of toilets. He had been looking at the Covid website, and it was not clear how much cleaning was actually required as there seemed to be more emphasis placed on individuals to look after themselves. Cost could be cut by reducing hours spent cleaning, he suggested. Peter Geary, returning to the online poll, said it should be taken as a steer of public opinion and was not a referendum. It should be used as input to the building of the budget and setting the precept for the next financial year once the public had been given a full breakdown, he said, and once again recommended adjourning the item.  Paul Collins interjected saying he did not believe there was a need to adjourn since the point under discussion was quite specific and was an abuse of the fund. Graham Harrison said he had suggested at the last meeting that OTC place an advert in The Phonebox since Facebook was full of ‘Chinese whispers’ and not relevant. Deirdre pointed out that should already have been done as it was already an action from the minutes of last month’s meeting.  Colin Rodden felt that all councillors should be involved in the wording of any survey since he wasn’t happy with the wording and ‘binary’ nature of the poll that had been posted and then removed. Andrea pointed out that the matter of the toilets had been devolved by full council to herself, Desmond and Jeremy, and she had consulted with them before the poll was posted. Jeremysaid he was minded to adopt Peter’s suggestion to adjourn the item, but Joanne Eley asked how OTC could award themselves a grant and match fund it, as per the conditions of the fund. ‘The proposer’ was the immediate past financial Chair and should be fully aware of how these things work, she said. Graham Harrison suggested a vote and Jeremy agreed and asked for a seconder. Nobody offered to second the motion, so Jeremy said the proposal therefore fell. The following discussion is reported verbatim:

    Resignation:
    Deirdre: Can I just have a word please? Jeremy: Yes, and then we’ll move on. Deirdre: We will - well, I won’t because I am resigning. I have no confidence in this absolute shambles of a council. It has just been going downhill; we cannot keep staff. I’m sorry, I’m out of it – I resign. Jeremy: If you’d like to put that in writing, thank you Deirdre. Deirdre: I will put it in writing, but I am resigning, I have had enough. Unknown: Move on. Deirdre: I have been on that Council for 42 years… Graham: (Harrison): Yeah, that’s the problem. Deirdre: The last year has been HELL and the year before that was  also HELL, and there are certain Councillors and certain (indecipherable – spoken over) that have made it that way. Malcolm: (Messenger): You cannot do this in public. Jeremy: That’s enough, thank you Deirdre. Thank you VERY much,  that’s enough. Thank you. OK, moving on… Graham: Turn my microphone…

    OTC to Take Over Running of Youth Centre from MKC
    A letter had been received from the new Youth Centre Management Committee explaining that they were not asking OTC to take over the running of the Youth Centre but to provide a level of support and financial help in tackling the problem of rent and cost of repairs. More specifically, they were seeking help in negotiating an acceptable lease agreement with MKC which was currently demanding £12.5K per year rent, making the operation unviable based on current predicted hires. The building has become dilapidated through neglect by MKC over many years and now requires considerable investment, including what Peter Gearyreferred to as a six-figure sum to repair the roof.  The committee are in a stand-off position with MK Council and cannot seem to be able to converse with someone who can make a genuine decision. Indeed one person seemed to be deliberately obstructive. Jeremy said that when he and Steve Clark were on the previous management committee, they had similar problems. A long discussion took place, which would normally be reported in detail, but which unfortunately will need to be abbreviated due to space restraints. Colin Rodden reported that he and Peter Geary had recently attended a meeting with the new management committee. He reminded councillors that some years ago OTC were in the process of taking over full responsibility for the Youth Centre under the Community Asset Transfer Scheme, but MKC had withdrawn from the transfer when the Neighbourhood Plan identified the site for potential health service use, since a condition of the transfer would be that the entire site retains its original usage. Many local groups are currently using the Youth Centre, and it could be a valuable community asset with the associated green space. Petersaid that as Ward Councillor he would be negotiating with MKC to get a resolution which he hoped would result in MKC completing the major building works to enable the building to remain open. He will report back regularly to Olney Town Council. 

    Update on Section 106 Monies Due to OTC
    As Chairman of the Development Committee (DC), Chris Tennant gave an update on the progress of applications for Section 106 (Planning Gain) grants available to Olney Town Council. Developers pay an agreed sum to MKC, and local councils and other community groups can apply for portions of that sum for projects related to services that they provide as developments progress to completion. The Olney Neighbourhood Plan lists projects that the DC would endeavour to seek funding for and make applications on behalf of other community groups.  Desmond Eley said it was important that the DC started to deliver on the promises in the Neighbourhood PlanChris reminded Desmond that as a member of the DC, he (Desmond) had been actioned at the last meeting to test the process by providing a costed solution with a design of the Whirley Pits play area. Desmond said that, unfortunately, Covid had got in the way of the design process. Chris said he looked forward to receiving Desmond’s report at the next DC meeting. Joanne Eley asked how the promised public consultation with residents about the refreshment of the Neighbourhood Plan would take place. Chris said at a previous DC meeting, at which Joanne was present, the Communication and Engagement Strategy which contained that information was tabled and agreed. Joanne asked what that document looked like. Chris responded that it had been issued to her as a published document, but at the following meeting she had resigned from the Development Committee.

    The Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 7th September, at 7.00pm if online else 7.30pm if in the Council Chamber. If you’d like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.

    Footnote:
    After this meeting Deputy Mayor Sally Pezaro also resigned from the council.
    Letters from standing and previous councillors relating to the meeting:
    See pages 36 to 39 of the September issue to read letters received regarding this meeting from councillors and previous councillors regarding the conduct of Olney Town Council.


    Olney Council EGM report for 28th August 2020

    The Olney Town Council EGM held on Friday 28th August 2020 at 19:00 could not be watched or listened to. This issue has since been attributed to a poor internet connection. It is unclear if the issue has been rectified so that it will not occur again in the future.


    Public Access to Meetings:

    For the duration of the COVID-19 restrictions, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be held online as audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by surfing to the OTC web page, www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, clicking on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scrolling down to the announcement about the next meeting where you will find a link to the agenda and another to join the meeting listen-only. 

    Public Participation:
    Jeremy Rawlings introduced this section, highlighting its maximum 15 minutes’ duration and noting that, if more entries were received than can be read in the time, the remainder would not be read out until the next meeting.  Citing advice received, GDPR and other regulations, current practice is that contributors’ names are not read out. For the first time Mercury can remember, the sheer number of entries received did indeed mean that the time limit passed before all had been read. Most that were read out, around seven, were on the subject of the public toilets, all requesting they be kept open. Reasons included that closing them would make people shop elsewhere, the up-coming retirement homes being built near Sainsbury’s would increase the local elderly population and thus the need, it would have negative effects on people with certain medical needs, and that our values as a caring community would be undermined if they closed.

    Two entries dared to be different.:
    The first looked back, asking various administrative questions of the Council, including why Quarterly and Annual Financial Reports has not been published since 2018, particularly as the 2017/18 accounts appeared to have been qualified by auditors.The second looked forward, and a post-meeting enquiry revealed it to be from the happy-to-be-named Mike Pezaro. Noting an interest due to being from the husband of a recently resigned Councillor, but containing his own views, it discussed the possible implications of last month’s Council meeting and the working environment it depicted:  “The recent resignation of numerous Councillors and the Public meetings in which rude and bullying behaviour was clearly prevalent, and a weak apology made in retrospect, has led to my perception of the Council as an unpleasant and toxic environment to work in. I'm sure my view is representative of many people in the town, given the vocal response on social media. With multiple positions on the Council now being available, I am concerned that many capable and caring candidates will not put themselves forward for fear of becoming either associated with or a victim of noxious behaviours. What is Olney Town Council doing to address the underlying issues within the Council, and to encourage the Public to become part of a revitalised, compassionate team?”

    Planning application:
    This item discussed a planning application for an extension to 64 High Street, and associated concern from those living in an adjacent property. Steve Clark, absent from this meeting, had visited the concerned residents and written a report which Councillors now considered. Peter Geary had also visited, noting this one of the most interesting applications he’d seen in quite a while. Chris Tennant noted that planning is an assessment of technical and subjective points, taken in the round to get a balance. Subjective elements here included poor quality design and potential overdevelopment, and technical ones loss of sunlight, daylight and privacy. He felt Olney Town Council, OTC, should express its concerns to Milton Keynes Council.

    Public Toilets:
    Desmond Eley introduced this item, having written a paper that included a proposal. First, he noted that OTC had agreed in July that everybody wanted to keep the toilets open, and that it was only the financial restriction that made it decide to review the situation in September.  Basic facts had to be considered, he said. Any plan of action would have to stay contemporary with the latest and changing COVID-19 guidance, and unless the toilets were cleaned and disinfected after every use, they could never be guaranteed safe. He had taken a look at how other local authorities had dealt with the situation. His proposal reduced the number of cleans to one per day, and included the display of a notice on each facility stating that it cannot be maintained COVID-19 safe, and those who use it do so at their own risk.  In summary, his proposal aims to maintain the provision of the facilities in line with contemporary COVID-19 restrictions and public demand, with operational decisions made by the Council office, and the cost being within the yearly budget – as cleaning once a day should be. He recommended his proposal to Council. This was discussed at length, Peter Geary proposing an amendment – that the Council also seek advice that the plan is in line with current COVID-19 guidance. This was accepted by majority, then the main vote unanimously. Jeremy Rawlings concluded this agenda item noting that, in spite the social media interest in this topic, there had never been a proposal to permanently close the toilets. The Council had never discussed that, he said.

    Opening the Olney Centre for bookings:
    Jeremy Rawlings introduced this topic. The Olney Centre had closed in March due to lockdown and, now that some of the regulations had been relaxed and certain events made permissible, the Council should consider whether to reopen the Centre. The costs of reopening were quite significant compared to the income it may generate, he said. Specifically, the estimated loss to open from the quarter October to December was around £6,000. Note that the following discussion is independent of the preschool and library, each run independently within the building. Various views were put forward. Joanne Eley suggested delaying reopening, as there was little interest from Centre users. Colin Rodden believed the Youth Centre was planning to reopen in October, and felt it would be a really positive message to the community if the Olney Centre reopened at the same time. Paul Collins suggested finding some way for the Centre to operate which didn’t require caretaker input, for example asking the hirers to do their own setup and takedown, and restricting hires to certain days. Desmond Eley suggested Councillors could lock and unlock the Centre, saving more money. Peter Geary felt the Centre should open ASAP else hiring groups may go elsewhere, their income lost for good. Others felt a short delay might be in order, given the upward trajectory of new COVID-19 infections in the UK. Councillors voted unanimously to reopen the Olney Centre on 10th October or as soon as practical, for the least cost possible. The terms and conditions of hire will be amended to reflect changes in the service offered.

    Dickens of a Christmas:
    This item was to discuss whether to stage Dickens of a Christmas this year, given COVID-19. Jeremy Rawlings felt there were two alternatives: Cancel the event completely or run a small event with just the outdoor markets, maybe called ‘Olney welcomes St. Nicholas’. Chris Tenant, fully supportive of holding Dickens in a perhaps-reduced format, suggested obtaining a traffic regulation order to close the High Street for a fixed number of hours, leaving a wide thoroughfare giving more public space to allow proper social distancing and segregation of stallholders and public. Jeremy Rawlings noted that, while this might be possible, the A509 was a primary trunk road, so the diversion must also be along primary trunk roads. The diversion would be significant, all the way between the Chicheley and Warrington roundabouts. Peter Geary felt Chris’s comments deserved investigation, though the event would still need to be scaled down for this year, for reasons including that it may have to be cancelled at short notice. After further discussion, Jeremy Rawlings proposed that a small event be held, combining the Thursday and Farmers’ Markets, but including neither entertainment nor craft fair. This was passed by majority, with the naming of the event yet to be decided.

    Council Newsletter:
    Jeremy Rawlings explained that the Council used to write a newsletter, delivered to all houses in Olney by Council staff and Councillors. However, the birth of the Phonebox and Mercury meant it faded and fell from publication. The desire to resurrect it was mainly due to recent negative publicity on social media. People were not aware of the good things which the Council does, he said. The Council voted unanimously in favour, so expect to see the first quarterly newsletter drop through your letterbox soon.

    Bits ‘n’ bobs:
    Desmond Eley noted that the repair of the allotment tracks was felt by one allotment holder to be ‘the best job in 30 years’. Jeremy Rawlings said that a valid request for an election had taken place for the three recent Council vacancies, so the Council would remain five down until May 2021 when all 15 places would be up for election. So, it’d be ten Councillors until next May. “At the moment we’re still quorate”, he noted, “and hopefully that will remain so”.   The next meeting will be held on Monday 5th October, at 7.00pm if online else 7.30pm if in the Council Chamber. If you’d like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@ olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, stating whether you would like your name to be included with the communication to be read out.

    STOP PRESS: News in after the Meeting
    It is with great regret that Olney Town Council has taken the difficult decision to Cancel the Dickens of a Christmas event this year. Consideration was given to a downscaled event but after discussion with local traders and market traders, it was clear that it would not be right to stage an event to bring people into Olney from far and wide given the Covid –19 situation. We will reinstate this event as soon as it is safe to do so. There will be a Thursday Market every Thursday including Christmas Eve so you can get all the fresh festive produce for the big day. There will also be a December Farmers Market on Sunday 6th December.
    August: Mercury Report Public access to meetings For the duration of the COVID restrictions, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be held online using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by surfing to www.olneytowncouncil. gov.uk, clicking the ‘Announcements’ menu and scrolling down to the announcement about the next meeting, where there’s a link to the agenda and another to join the meeting listen-only. Public participation A retailer on the Market Place was first to have her contribution read by Andrea Vincent, Town Clerk. Noting her awareness that a proposal to use some areas of the Market Place car park for seating had been discussed and rejected by OTC, due mainly to parking, antisocial behaviour and litter concerns, she wanted to express her and the majority of small retailers’ thanks for this. She was pleased the Council had listened to them. She continued that, if it wished to support the small businesses further, they’d prefer the Council to contact them directly rather than through a third party. Noting that Olney has a successful and attractive High Street and Market Place, she felt the lockdown had pressured many businesses, leaving some worried about their ability to survive. If help were available, they’d be very happy to work with the Council, she said. She concluded by thanking Councillors for their help with the situation on the Recreation Ground and bathing areas. A Timpsons Row resident had also been in contact, this time concerning the increased number of visitors to the Recreation Ground in recent weeks. They went on to share some incidents they’d seen, in the hope the information would be useful. The main issue in Timpsons Row was parking, it seeing typically 50 additional vehicles on warm days, obstructing pedestrians and traffi c. Noting that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) is responsible for parking in Olney, they encouraged OTC to work with MKC to take a firm stance on the issue – more restrictions and enforcement. Stating that most visitors to the Recreation Ground have to drive, they felt restricting parking would thus restrict visitor numbers – the issue wasn’t with people visiting the Recreation Ground, it was with their sheer number. Noting the nearby gate to the field and inadequate parking-related signage in the Row, they felt closing the gate during the Summer may help. Examples of antisocial behaviour have included residents being sworn at and threatened with violence, and a woman walking down the side of a house to change out of her swimming costume before getting in her car. A mass brawl was also noted, resulting in people walking past covered in blood. They asked residents, the Police, OTC and MKC to work together to devise solutions – else the situation would worsen each year. They concluded by thanking OTC for its work keeping the town in such wonderful condition. Last in this section, another contributor noted the consequences of OTC closing the public toilets during lockdown. This was without legal requirement, they said, toilets in many neighbouring towns remaining open. It had led to antisocial behaviour with people urinating and defecating on the Recreation Ground, outside commercial premises and in alleyways. This was a health and safety issue, and the lack of open toilets had put people off visiting the town, particularly the young, elderly and disabled. Given COVID, commercial premises were understandably reluctant to let the public use their facilities, they felt. They asked the Council to open and regularly clean the public toilets. They also noted that the Government had congratulated towns which had kept their toilets open, urging those who had not to reopen them safely. Andrea concluded this section, noting that OTC was following Government guidance to reopen the toilets, with the significant cost implications entailed. Apologies for absence and declarations of interest Debbie Whitworth had sent her apologies. No declarations of interest were made. Approving the previous meeting’s minutes Colin Rodden asked whether the Council had talked about the public toilets being closed, as he couldn’t recall it, particularly given the noted possibility of permanent closure. Jeremy Rawlings replied that the idea of retailers opening their facilities for the public, as happens in some other towns, had been discussed. That discussion had been started as it raised the possibility that the maintenance, management and refurbishment of the public toilets would not need to take place. Desmond Eley noted that, pre COVID, a working group had been created to look into the remodelling of the Market Place, necessarily including consideration of the public toilets. The choices were to remodel, extend or close, retaining just the disabled facility and that for the market traders. The decision process is ongoing, pending the group gleaning the information required to make it. Deirdre Bethune noted she didn’t feel it sensible currently to talk with retailers about opening their toilets. The decision is on hold pending a clearer way forward with COVID. Town Clerk’s report OTC has engaged BT in order to achieve a faster internet connection and IP-based phones. Jeremy noted that, in his professional opinion, he’d not touch BT with a barge pole, and agreed to talk later with Andrea. The Amazon offer for new OTC offi ce hardware that the previous meeting agreed to purchase was time limited and now expired. Quotes from a third local supplier will be obtained, and the three brought to Council for a decision. Noting the need for the Olney Centre to restart generating income, Desmond Eley mentioned that Room 2, normally used for marriages, was currently occupied by the Olney COVID Support Group’s equipment. The Council had asked it how much longer, but not yet received a response. Jeremy will pursue this noting, at Graham Harrison’s suggestion, that the Council would need the full building in the near future. Andrea noted the incredibly hard work of Council staff during the COVID restrictions. They had received a large number of criticisms, mainly about the situation with the Recreation Ground, but also some thanks. She thanked the team, a sentiment echoed strongly by Jeremy. The litter issues, he explained, were due to the amount being discarded.  The Council had devoted the resources to clear it up. Councillors discussed whether providing more anti-litter signage on the Recreation Ground would help, Deirdre thinking it would. Although no consensus was reached, the weight of opinion appeared to be that it would not. Andrea noted that, even when the local Lions group had handed out bin bags to groups of people on the Recreation Ground, they had often not been filled. Joanne Eley noted that some of the unsung heroes in this episode were the Olney and Clifton Reynes Fishing association, working hard to clear up litter from the riverbank. Graham noted that this was a country-wide problem, not affecting just Olney. Jeremy explained that, although the “alcohol exclusion zone” signs were widely ignored, they gave the Police authority to act. Deirdre noted she may provide anti-litter signs at her own expense. Recreations and Services A multi-agency meeting had been held to discuss the issues on the Recreation Ground. Desmond explained what happened, the following a brief summary. The mass gathering issue did not start with COVID, instead having grown over the last three or so years, fuelled in part by mainstream and social media. The option of closing the East Street car park or charging an admission fee was discussed and its many downsides noted, for example the logistics of charging a fee, and the impact on parking elsewhere including the effect on emergency services vehicle access. This was left with OTC to decide on and manage. The public toilets should be opened as soon as practically possible. Thames Valley Police is pleased with the recently installed “alcohol exclusion zone” signs. Fencing could be installed to funnel visitors to discourage walking across sports pitches. OTC has lost all its income streams due to COVID and, in spite of multiple requests, no funding or grants had been made available to help it tackle these problems. A key safe will be provided to allow emergency services vehicle access from East Street. The ensuing discussion was lengthy and, again, the following a brief summary. Deirdre asked Desmond to clarify the statement on fencing. The aim, he explained, was to funnel people entering the Recreation Ground from beside and behind the Rugby Club to walk between the Bowls Club and the MUGA, entering the Ground near the toilet block. That way, they’d be more likely to avoid the sports pitches, particularly the cricket pitch which had seen people walk across even while cricket was being played. Footpath locations and bye-laws were discussed, as was the fact that OTC hires out the pitches to the clubs, which then expect a facility on which they can play sport safely. Colin Rodden asked how decisions were being made, particularly on the fencing and signage. Desmond explained that no money had been spent without committee approval, and Jeremy Rawlings that in these diffi cult times decisions had to be taken quickly. Jeremy asked Colin if he was happy with this, his immediate response being silence, and later one that more consultation was required. Re the East Street car park, Peter Geary outlined three options: First, continue as now – people turn up in whatever numbers, the Council attempts to manage the paths they take to the river, clears up after them and stomachs the costs. Second, try to dissuade people at all costs – for example lock the East Street car park, but that would disrupt visiting teams and displace parking. Third, charge for the East Street car park to help mitigate the money spent by the Council – but the logistics and inconvenience for legitimate users would be significant. None is a perfect solution, but people expect OTC to do something, even if that’s the first option. It is public open space, and we cannot stop people from accessing it, he said. There are no easy solutions although, as lockdown continues to ease, people will at least have more choice of places to visit. Skipping much of the discussion, the Council set up a small working group to look at charging for the East Street car park in peak season. Deirdre asked that the group keep all Councillors up to date, because that didn’t always happen. It was noted that, while there was insufficient time to make this decision in the very short term, it will not be straightforward to make in the long term either. For example, a permit holder scheme would help residents but be less obviously beneficial for sports match away teams. David Coles’ open letter, as published in last month’s Phonebox, was also noted for Council consideration. This section concluded with Desmond asking Deirdre about her earlier comment reworking groups not reporting back to the Council. He asked which working group Deirdre thought hadn’t reported back. She did not respond. Opening up the High Street This item noted the reasons the proposal to use some of the Market Place car park for seating was rejected. These were that, in spite of sending a letter to each shop nearby, no responses at all were received, and that the Police thought the idea “madness” and would attract antisocial behaviour. Bits ‘n’ bobs The Council had received three quotes for Autumn and Winter bedding plants, accepting Alban Hill Nurseries’. It will also seek quotes for a new mower for the Cemetery. Desmond reported that, in the second half of May, there appeared to have been a significant and sudden drop in the Council’s store of red diesel. Measures have been taken to ensure control and monitoring of the store, with others pending if agreed. Allotment Association Agreement Desmond noted that, as reported previously, the Recreations and Services Committee had been discussing the formation of a service agreement with the Allotment Association, expected to move forward in October subject to agreement. This had been done informally so far, but formalising the group of Councillors involved as a working group with authority to make decisions would be appropriate to continue this work. Finance Paul Collins provided a broad overview of the Council’s finances given COVID. His major area of concern was the current reduced income from the markets and Olney Centre room hire. He noted that many of the room hirers have memberships skewed towards the at-risk age groups, meaning the drop in income could be relatively long-term. In the three months to 30th June, these sources of income were down £9,500 compared with a year ago. Unlike commercial businesses and non-profits, the Council had not been eligible for business rates relief or the Retail, Hospitality, and Leisure Grant – almost singled out for special, unfair treatment he felt. Further, none of the extra money paid by Government to higher-tier Local Authorities appeared to have trickled down to Parish Council level. Hopefully, this would change. In terms of expenditure, OTC had been mindful of the need to make significant savings, and thus expenditure for this financial year is more than £30,000 below that a year ago. However, this level of saving would not be maintained once the Olney Centre was reopened. He hoped that, by October, the Council would have a clearer view of how things will turn out. He also noted the costs of the antisocial behaviour on the Recreation Ground, and of the enhanced public toilet cleaning regime. Andrea noted that cleaning both sets of toilets will cost £700 - £1,000 per week. Desmond raised the opportunity to promote Room 2 of the Olney Centre for marriages, noting the potential logjam for such events – it was important to know what was happening with that room. Jeremy will further ask the COVID Support Group about its plans. Although feeling that marriage bookings may not pick up until next year, Steve Clark agreed that OTC should indeed aggressively market use of the Centre for marriages. Deirdre asked about the state of the Recreation Ground toilets. These had been vandalised seriously pre COVID and, while that had delayed their repair, it would happen shortly. Olney Development Group Chris Tennant reported that a review of Olney’s existing Neighbourhood Plan had started. He then ran through the local development sites, of which just the residential ones are covered here. On site A, Lavendon Road, work had started on the building of 50 homes. On site B, Warrington Road, outline permission had been granted. As for site C, off Osiers Road adjacent to the business park, while not allocated for housing the construction of 66 homes was in progress. On sites D&E, off Aspreys and Yardley Road, very large-scale archaeological site investigations had started. The reserved matters planning application for the 250 homes on those sites is live and out for consultation, with further drawings and reports received. OTC had objected to this application and asked for it to be considered by the MKC Development Control Committee. Chris noted issues with MKC Planning Department not necessarily consulting with members of the public and Councillors, something it is now reviewing. He felt this was an effect of lockdown. At site R, the Sainsbury’s store is open but the planning application by Angle Properties and McCarthey & Stone, for sheltered and retirement living on the remaining land had, contrary to the Neighbourhood Plan, been allowed on appeal. Jeremy noted that the sites D&E reserved matters application contained significant changes. Chris agreed noting that, of most concern, a significant proportion of the promised public open space had since been extracted, no longer forming part of sites’ D&E delivery, never envisaged in the Neighbourhood Plan. Chris felt the MKC Chief Planner at the time, who’d since moved on, had perhaps dropped the ball in that regard by allowing this change as part of the Section 106 agreement. Essentially, the town was being held to ransom on a future development option North of site E. He felt it important to note that OTC was unhappy with this situation – we can’t have part of a playing pitch delivered, where OTC hasn’t considered a future planning application on a site outside the settlement boundary. Other issues include access: The original land promoter did not own the land strip which could provide access from Aspreys so, while MKC and OTC were previously keen to pursue that access, it was not in the promoter’s gift to offer. However, the strip is owned by the chosen developer, Vistry (ex-Bovis), meaning that it could, if it chose, deliver that access. Finally, the reserved matters application includes some three-storey apartment blocks, never originally envisaged. It was already the highest site in Olney in topographical terms. He felt this change perhaps a little disingenuous. Peter Geary, agreeing with much of Chris’s description and noting it pretty disappointing, expressed confidence in the current MKC Planning Officer. Re the issues with the playing fi eld, he felt these were known about before and were one of the reasons he was against the outline application. This was not exactly in the spirit of things, and he felt Chris was right about the current situation. Desmond asked Chris whether, given the recent building work, there were any Section 106 monies which OTC could draw down, with a view to accessing funds to spend around the town. Chris will look into this. The next meeting will be held on Monday 7th September, at 7.00 pm if online else 7.30 pm if in the Council Chamber. If you’d like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    • Public access to Meetings
    For the duration of the COVID-19 restrictions, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be held online as audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by surfing to the OTC web page, www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, clicking on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scrolling down to the announcement about the next meeting where you will find a link to the agenda and another to join the meeting listen-only. 
    Public Participation
    Jeremy Rawlings introduced this section, highlighting it’s maximum 15 minutes’ duration and noting that, if more entries were received than can be read in the time, the remainder would not be read out until the next meeting.  Citing advice received, GDPR and other regulations, current practice is that contributors’ names are not read out. For the first time Mercury can remember, the sheer number of entries received did indeed mean that the time limit passed before all had been read. Most, around seven, were on the subject of the public toilets, all requesting they be kept open. Reasons included that closing them would make people shop elsewhere, the up-coming retirement homes being built near Sainsbury’s would increase the local elderly population and thus the need, it would have negative effects on people with certain medical needs, and that our values as a caring community would be undermined if they closed.
    Two entries dared to be different
    Quarterly and Annual Financial Reports: The first looked back, asking various administrative questions of the Council, including why quarterly and annual financial reports has not been published since 2018, particularly as the 2017/18 accounts appeared to have been qualified by auditors.  Last Month's Meeting and the Working Environment it depicted The second looked forward, and a post-meeting enquiry revealed it to be from the happy-to-be-named Mike Pezaro. Noting an interest due to being from the husband of a recently resigned Councillor, but containing his own views, it discussed the possible implications of last month’s Council meeting and the working environment it depicted: “The recent resignation of numerous Councillors and the Public meetings in which rude and bullying behaviour was clearly prevalent, and a weak apology made in retrospect, has led to my perception of the Council as an unpleasant and toxic environment to work in. I'm sure my view is representative of many people in the town, given the vocal response on social media. With multiple positions on the Council now being available, I am concerned that many capable and caring candidates will not put themselves forward for fear of becoming either associated with or a victim of noxious behaviours. What is Olney Town Council doing to address the underlying issues within the Council, and to encourage the Public to become part of a revitalised, compassionate team?”
    Planning application
    This item discussed a planning application for an extension to 64 High Street, and associated concern from those living in an adjacent property. Steve Clark, absent from this meeting, had visited the concerned residents and written a report which Councillors now considered.  Peter Geary had also visited, noting this as one of the most interesting applications he’d seen in quite a while.  Chris Tennant noted that planning is an assessment of technical and subjective points, taken in the round to get a balance. Subjective elements here included poor quality design and potential over development, and technical ones, loss of sunlight, daylight and privacy. He felt Olney Town Council, OTC, should express its concerns to Milton Keynes Council.
    Public toilets
    Desmond Eley introduced this item, having written a paper that included a proposal. First, he noted that OTC had agreed in July that everybody wanted to keep the toilets open, and that it was only the financial restriction that made it decide to review the situation in September. Basic facts had to be considered, he said. Any plan of action would have to stay contemporary with the latest and changing COVID-19 guidance, and unless the toilets were cleaned and disinfected after every use, they could never be guaranteed safe.  He had taken a look at how other local authorities had dealt with the situation. His proposal reduced the number of cleans to one per day, and included the display of a notice on each facility stating that it cannot be maintained COVID-19 safe, and those who use it do so at their own risk. In summary, his proposal aims to maintain the provision of the facilities in line with contemporary COVID-19 restrictions and public demand, with operational decisions made by the Council office, and the cost being within the yearly budget – as cleaning once a day should be. He recommended his proposal to Council. This was discussed at length, Peter Geary proposing an amendment – that the Council also seek advice that the plan is in line with current COVID-19 guidance. This was accepted by majority, then the main vote unanimously. Jeremy Rawlings concluded this agenda item noting that, in spite of the social media interest in this topic, there had never been a proposal to permanently close the toilets. The Council had never discussed that, he said.
    Opening the Olney Centre for bookings
    Jeremy Rawlings introduced this topic. The Olney Centre had closed in March due to lockdown and, now that some of the regulations had been relaxed and certain events made permissible, the Council should consider whether to reopen the Centre. The costs of reopening were quite significant compared to the income it may generate, he said. Specifically, the estimated loss to open from the quarter October to December was around £6,000.  Note that the following discussion is independent of the preschool and library, each run independently within the building. Various views were put forward.  Joanne Eley suggested delaying reopening, as there was little interest from Centre users.  Colin Rodden believed the Youth Centre was planning to reopen in October, and felt it would be a really positive message to the community if the Olney Centre reopened at the same time.  Paul Collins suggested finding some way for the Centre to operate which didn’t require caretaker input, for example asking the hirers to do their own setup and take-down, and restricting hires to certain days.  Desmond Eley suggested Councillors could lock and unlock the Centre, saving more money.  Peter Geary felt the Centre should open ASAP else hiring groups may go elsewhere, their income lost for good. Others felt a short delay might be in order, given the upward trajectory of new COVID-19 infections in the UK. Councillors voted unanimously to reopen the Olney Centre on 10th October or as soon as practical, for the least cost possible. The terms and conditions of hire will be amended to reflect changes in the service offered.
    Dickens of a Christmas
    This item was to discuss whether to stage Dickens of a Christmas this year, given COVID-19. Jeremy Rawlings felt  there were two alternatives: Cancel the event completely or run a small event with just the outdoor markets, maybe called ‘Olney welcomes St. Nicholas’.  Chris Tenant, fully supportive of holding Dickens in a perhaps-reduced format, suggested obtaining a traffi c regulation order to close the High Street for a fixed number of hours, leaving a wide thoroughfare giving more public space to allow proper social distancing and segregation of stallholders and public.  Jeremy Rawlings noted that, while this might be possible, the A509 was a primary trunk road, so the diversion must also be along primary trunk roads. The diversion would be significant, all the way between the Chicheley and Warrington roundabouts.  Peter Geary felt Chris’s comments deserved investigation, though the event would still need to be scaled down for this year, for reasons including that it may have to be cancelled at short notice.  After further discussion, Jeremy Rawlings proposed that a small event be held, combining the Thursday and Farmers’ Markets, but including neither entertainment nor craft fair. This was passed by majority, with the naming of the event yet to be decided.
    Council Newsletter
    Jeremy Rawlings explained that the Council used to write a newsletter, delivered to all houses in Olney by Council staff and Councillors. However, the birth of the Phonebox and Mercury meant it faded and fell from publication. The desire to resurrect it was mainly due to recent negative publicity on social media. People were not aware of the good things which the Council does, he said. The Council voted unanimously in favour, so expect to see the first quarterly newsletter drop through your letterbox soon.
    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    Desmond Eley noted that the repair of the allotment tracks was felt by one allotment holder to be ‘the best job in 30 years’.  Jeremy Rawlings said that a valid request for an election had taken place for the three recent Council vacancies, so the Council would remain five down until May 2021 when all 15 places would be up for election. So, it’d be ten Councillors until next May. “At the moment we’re still quorate”, he noted, “and hopefully that will remain so”. The next meeting will be held on Monday 5th October, at 7.00pm if online else 7.30pm if in the Council Chamber. If you’d like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, stating whether you would like your name to be included with the communication to be read out.
    Late News: Dickens Cancelled
    It is with great regret that Olney Town Council has taken the diffi cult decision to cancel the Dickens of a Christmas event this year. Consideration was given to a downscaled event but after discussion with local traders and market traders, it was clear that it would not be right to stage an event to bring people into Olney from far and wide given the Covid –19 situation. We will reinstate this event as soon as it is safe to do so. There will be a Thursday Market every Thursday including Christmas Eve so you can get all the fresh festive produce for the big day. There will also be a December Farmers Market on Sunday 6th December.
    Public Access to Meetings
    For the duration of the COVID crisis meetings of Olney Town Council will be held as online audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings and view the presentations by clicking on a link on the OTC web page www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk Click on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scroll down to the announcement about the next meeting where you will find a link to the agenda and another to join the meeting. Town Clerk Andrea Vincent noted that there were 15 members of the public viewing the online meeting.
    Public Participation:
    In the absence of the opportunity to speak at public meetings the public may submit written items to the clerk to be read out. Mercury would normally name those who speak at an open meeting, unless they specifically ask not to be identified. Under the new regime the clerk redacts the names from any correspondence. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings introduced this section, saying that it needs to be done verbally due to the limitations of the currently used technology. He started by reading submissions to the September meeting that were not read out due to the maximum 15 minutes’ duration of this section. Speeding Traffic along Driftway The first was regarding the speed of traffic along Driftway, reminding the council that the last time the Speed Indicating Device (SID) was used to measure traffic flow and speeds it was evident that the majority of vehicles were exceeding the 30 mph limit. Since then the new Sainsbury’s store had opened and the footpath completed along the remainder of Driftway. This footpath is well used by shoppers and parents taking their children to the Middle School. There would be more compliance with the speed limit if drivers were more aware of the speed limit, the correspondent thought, and suggested that road markings, width restriction markings, or repeater signage fitted to the lampposts could be employed. Jeremy Rawlings said that his understanding was that none of the suggestions were lawful in a 30 mph zone, but the matter would be passed to the Recs and Services Committee. Closure of the Public Toilets The second letter was regarding the much discussed but no longer planned closure of the public toilets on the Market Place. The writer noted that the suggestion by an ex-councillor to use the Community Fund to finance the continued operation of the facilities was not approved. (For information: The OTC Community Support Fund, previously known as the Sidney Dix Fund after a local benefactor, exists to provide financial support for voluntary and community groups in the Parish. If granted, groups are expected to match the grant from their own funds). The correspondent noted that the council had apparently changed the rules last year to grant the museum £15k split over three years. They also understood that the current contractor completes the required cleaning in less than the allotted time and suggested that the council look to cut the allocated time (and therefore presumably the cost) and also explain how much it cost to clean the toilets pre-Covid so that the actual additional Council Tax sum could be calculated. Jeremy Rawlings replied that pretty much all of these issues had been addressed in a previous meeting. OTC Chair of Finance and Chairman of the Museum Trustees Paul Collins interjected to say that the letter was factually incorrect in saying that £15k had been allocated to the museum as that was not the case. The grant was to support other community groups in putting forward their own small projects for the Amazing Grace 250 celebration, he said. Mercury assumes that it would be down to those groups to provide their own matched funding, although that was not stated.  In Support of the Public Toilets The third letter was also in support of the public toilets and the correspondent said they were writing on behalf of the many users who did not have access to computers and emails or could not write letters. Again, Jeremy Rawlings emphasised that the toilets would remain open and the points raised had been addressed. The final letter was from members of FOLIO (Friends Of the Library In Olney) concerning the continued closure of the library. Milton Keynes Council (MKC) have stated that there is no date for opening up the four libraries that remain closed. The MKC Library Volunteer Coordinator has pointed out that those that have opened have done so with reduced opening hours and facilities. FOLIO asked for support from OTC to enable the library to be opened in the next phase. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that the Covid situation had changed significantly since that letter had been written and he did not see the library opening imminently. MKC had been very quick to close things down but not ‘overly quick’ in opening them up again, he said.
    Remembrance Day Parade
    A letter had been received from Chris Roberts The Royal British Legion (RBL) Olney Branch and North Bucks Group chairman asking what plans, if any, OTC have for this year’s remembrance parade on 8th November. Jeremy Rawlings said he could not see how it would be possible to hold a parade under the current Covid rules. Town Clerk Andrea Vincent put forward a proposal to close the Market Place for a much reduced event that could possibly be viewed by the public via a live video feed. Jeremy said attendance would have to be limited to six people and it would be impossible to prevent the public from attending. Peter Geary said his understanding that [nationally] parades would not happen, but events would be organised. The RBL should have guidelines to follow and all OTC can do is liaise with them, recognising that the situation could change before the event. Steve Clark agreed that the Market Place should be made available to the RBL and the council should try to get clarification as to what the max of six applies to, since that could easily be exceeded with sound/video engineers, a Church minister, the mayor and reps from the RBL. Graham Harrison pointed out that there would be an OTC meeting the week before the event where a fi nal decision could be made, which was agreed. Jeremy Rawlings finished by saying that it was sad times when the council had to consider cancelling such an important event.
    IT support and hardware tenders
    Two quotes had been obtained, one for £2900 and the other for £4100, and a third from a company that is used by several other local authorities was awaited. Joanne Eley asked if there was a cut-off date for the tenders and thought if so, the council should not wait for the last one if the date had been missed. Andrea Vincent replied that there was but many companies had been reluctant to quote as they considered OTC’s requirements to be rather ‘niche’ so she was attempting to be flexible. The current contractor was unable to provide the necessary back-up support and had declined to tender, she said. It was agreed to defer a decision to the Finance Committee.
    Odds and Sods
    It was noted that some councillors had not submitted a current Declaration of Interests to the clerk and were reminded to do so. Paul Collins noted that the Statement of Expenditure referred to August and not the current month, so it was agreed to roll it over to next month’s meeting.
    Town Clerk’s report
    The next Finance Committee meeting will look to considerably re-jig the budget in the light of the lack of income due to Covid.  The Annual Governance and Accountability Return (AGAR) is currently with the external auditor and there has been no feedback so far, so it is assumed that ‘no news is good news’.  New Part Time Cleaner As of the 28th September the council have engaged a self-employed part time cleaner for the external public toilets. The toilets are thoroughly cleaned each day on closure, a service that previous contractor was unable to provide.  The Olney Centre The Olney Centre is now open for bookings so long as they conform to the current Covid regulations. Several weddings have been booked but Andrea believed that OTC need to ‘smarten up their’ act to make it more attractive for weddings, as they are currently the only income stream for the Centre. She is working on a proposal which will be presented at the next meeting.  Thursday Market The Thursday Market is gradually increasing in size as stall holders return. Some of the traders have asked that there be a market on Sunday 13th December. OTC has instigated a poll of traders but at present there has not been much interest. There will, however, be a a Christmas Eve MarketMarket No Parking Signs There has been a complaint from the Thursday Market traders about cars parking overnight. Additional no parking signs are being provided on lampposts as the council’s insurers have said that the existing A-signs could cause damage to cars. Thanks have been received from a Farmers Market trader for the efficient work of the OTC office.  Ground Staff Thanks The ground staff have been thanked for their professional work in landscaping.  Freedom of Information Request There is currently a Freedom of Information request which is being progressed with the Information Commissioner’s Office.
    Olney Development Group
    This is the committee responsible for progressing and updating the Neighbourhood Plan (NP). Chris Tennant reported on the recent meeting of this committee saying that there are two significant government consultations as to how housing methodologies are calculated and also a white paper regarding planning for the future. Progress on the updating of the NP had been discussed, he said, and Section 106 funds (planning gain) from various developments are gradually becoming available. Refurbishment of Children’s play areas is being discussed with the Recs and Services Committee and the specification of the proposed community hall on the site of the Yardley Road development is being discussed with the developers.
    Recs and Services Committee
    Desmond Eley reported that there would shortly be a meeting of the committee. He said that while addressing the issue of council overspend it had been noted that council charges for market stalls, cemetery charges etc had not been increased for a number of years and had now fallen well below those of neighbouring councils. The full council had reviewed the charges over a year ago and decided to introduce increases in stages, rather than all at once, starting in April this year, and in the main charges were still below those of other councils.  There had recently been discussions on social media about increases to market stall charges, but they were relatively small and necessary. Negotiations regarding the lease of the ex-football club had stalled, he said because the solicitor at Garrard and Allen who was dealing with it had left the company and the one that had taken over had displayed a lack of knowledge on the draft lease and the current status. He said there were serious concerns about the performance of the council’s solicitors.  Olney Town Colts FC have asked for a reduction of their pitch rental due to the curtailment of their season due to Covid and to be able to pay the rental in stages.  They have also requested permission to install floodlights on their pitch on the Charity Field. Jeremy Rawlings thought that the floodlights would require planning permission from MKC and Chris Tennant agreed. Desmond said his main concern was that the lights would be pointing towards Timpsons Row, which would be an issue. Detail plans of the lighting patterns had been provided. Peter Geary said as landlords OTC would need to initially grant permission prior to formal planning permission being sought. It was agreed to discuss at the next Recs and Services Committee and then bring back to full council.  There have been requests from the public for additional dog bins, which are being progressed but there is an installation charge of £200 - £250 for each, plus the ongoing emptying charge.  Steve Clark pointed out that some play equipment on the Dagnell Road play area had been removed by MKC a couple of years ago and had not been replaced. MKC had not been forthcoming on his request for an update, he said.  Next Meeting The next meeting will be held online on Monday 2nd November, at 7.00pm. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Note:
    If you would like to be identified as the originator of any correspondence to that meeting in the Mercury report please contact the Phonebox at editor@phoneboxmagazine.com.
    Letter from the Mayor, Phil Geach
    Council Elections 6th May 2021 Whatever the next few months bring one thing is certain, as time goes on we will return to “normality” and our town will, with the care that has been shown by the residents, not only pull through but will flourish
    One thing that we should look to is that we will be having local elections (currently scheduled for 6th May 2021) and a number of people have expressed interest in standing for the Town Council.  I think that it is great for the ultimate welfare of the town to have as wide a choice of people from whom they can choose representatives as possible. We have seen a tremendous response from the town in response to Covid support volunteers and it would, in my opinion, be marvellous if we could continue this enthusiasm for public service going forward. I would hope that we could have representation from all sections of our community, business owners, a cross-section of age groups, etc. Some of those who have shown interest have commented that it would be good to know what being a Councillor required of them and I must admit to a lack of knowledge in these areas myself so I felt it might be helpful to seek some guidance.  To that end I am looking towards organising one or two “seminars” for those who may be interested.  The idea would be to hear from experienced individuals and cover such topics as: • Responsibilities of a town councillor • Duties of a town or Parrish Council • The relationship between the Town Council and Milton Keynes Council • The role of the Town Clerk I am currently in discussion with various bodies, including Milton Keynes Council and one of our Ward Councillors, as to how we might best achieve this and would hope to be able to publish a framework programme in the next couple of weeks. For the sake of openness; I am undecided whether or not to stand myself though I feel that, whatever my decision, people might find any information helpful in their personal choices.  The seminars would be to inform prospective candidates with no experience. I would like it to be impartial and not a forum for raising issues with the current council so, with that in mind, I would look to participants being those people who were considering standing and had not previously served on the council. Of course, as far as I’m concerned, anyone interested in just listening in would be welcome to do so, including past and current council members. I anticipate that, due to Covid restrictions, such seminars would be online and I’m exploring the price of a “Teams” Licence so I may ask participants for a small contribution to costs.  For those who may be considering standing a good first port of call would be to check your eligibility. Comprehensive guidance on this aspect can be found on the electoral commission website at electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/candidate-or-agent/parish-and-community-council-elections-england. Scroll down to Part 1 and select the Candidate guide - parish and community elections (part 1/6) pdf to view or download. Having read this if anyone would be interested in participating please drop me a line at: philip060521@outlook.com Take care and I look forward to a full mailbox! 
    Public access to meetings
    For the duration of the COVID-19 restrictions, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be held online as audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by surfing to the OTC web page, www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, clicking on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scrolling down to the announcement about the next meeting, where there’ll be one link to the agenda and another to join the meeting listen-only.
    Public participation
    The first communication was from an allotment holder. As one of the large majority of holders who is not a member of the Allotment Association, they much enjoy tending their allotment. The annual charges include the use of water, but the recently provisioned toilet facilities, provided mainly by lottery funding for the use of allotment holders, are designated for the use of Allotment Association members only. The correspondent felt that the toilets should be for the use of all allotment holders, and would support a modest addition to the charges towards their maintenance and repair. The second was from an Olney resident with a few suggestions. First, they felt Olney Town Councillors should retire at pension retirement age. Second, they suggested making East and West Streets one way, with limited parking and large roundabouts at their junctions. Third, they suggested a speed trap for the noisy cars heading North up the High Street to Santa Pod on Sunday mornings. Jeremy Rawlings said that pension retirement age was not a ‘thing’ anymore – people no longer have to retire at any age. He also noted that traffic concerns on East and West Streets had been discussed many times before and would be again. Indeed, there had been plans to discuss the topic pre lockdown.
    Community Land Trust
    Jeremy explained that, since earlier in the year, the Council has been investigating whether to establish a Community Land Trust for Olney, the aim being to promote the building of social housing starter homes for the young adults of Olney. The idea came about because some small packets of land in the town, with room for only one to three houses, had been identified as potential sites for building. Milton Keynes Council (MKC) said these land packets belong to Olney Town Council (OTC), which came as news to the latter. Councillors discussed it, then met with a specialist firm of solicitors. Andrea explained that, since OTC was not generally regarded as the type of Council that could build, a Community Land Trust would provide a vehicle with which to build dwellings. Alternatives could include a Housing Association, but then OTC would have no control over how the housing was let or sold. The Community Land Trust would be a trust of the people of Olney, working to create housing with a rationale as to the type of housing wanted, in perpetuity if desired. But, while OTC could have representatives on the Trust, the Council itself could not be that Trust – it would be an arms-length vehicle. The Council would then decide what land to lease or donate to the Trust, and the Trust would be able to raise monies itself. Also, small grants were available from the National Community Land Trust to help move towards creating Community Land Trusts. Jeremy concluded that more research was required before moving forward. Desmond Eley noted that the work was purely in the investigative phase at present. A report would then be written and presented to OTC for consideration. Colin Rodden felt this would be great for young people. Peter Geary said that, planning-wise, each site would be judged as usual and on its own merits. He also noted that, if there are pockets of land in the town which don’t have houses on them, it was probably for a reason.
    Statement of Expenditure
    This item was to review October’s Statement of Expenditure. Andrea noted that monthly expenditure was in the low £30,000s, while income was much less due to COVID – so OTC was eating into its reserves. Jeremy noted that the Public Toilet cleaning, opening and closing charge was just over £400 per month. The Council plans to keep both the Market Place and Recreation Ground toilets open, even though lockdown may reduce the number of people using them. Desmond Eley explained that OTC had taken another delivery of diesel this month, and was currently using around 30% of the volume it had before. Chris Tenant noted that the Olney Centre had been deep cleaned and bio-misted, requesting that the Council be mindful this may be required again. Andrea had been thinking of booking this quarterly, but with only one user of the Olney Centre since it being open, and it shortly closing again, the required timing may be rather different. Desmond noted he thought the virus only lasted 72 hours, in which case it was simply necessary to wait that long after a booking and there’d be no risk. Jeremy Rawlings and Paul Collins agreed.
    Town Clerk’s report
    Andrea presented this month’s report. She explained OTC had been surprised to receive a non-domestic rates bill for the Market Place car park, for which it didn’t know it was liable. It had therefore engaged a non-domestic rates specialist to look at the Council’s rates liabilities. Steve Clark noted he understood that, provided OTC used the Market Place as a market site first and did not charge for parking, rates did not apply. Andrea explained that, in fact, MKC had apparently been paying the non-domestic rates for the Market Place for the last 20 years in error. Joanne Eley asked whether, if OTC did pay rates on the Market Place, could it then charge for parking or collect fines? Andrea explained that the fines go to Napier Parking, the Council’s contractors, also noting she planned to speak with Napier as it wasn’t clear they were currently doing a good job. Peter explained that OTC had been advised some years ago that, if it made money from parking on the Market Place, it would have to pay rates there, this being why Napier were engaged on the current basis. Once it was confirmed that the new situation on rates was correct, it would be appropriate to renegotiate with Napier. Peter felt that in fact MKC may have been paying these rates under discretionary powers where, if an organisation gets relief for a proportion of business rates, MKC would pay the remainder. MKC was planning for next year, budgeting based on a worst case scenario, and looking for ways to make savings, he said. OTC did indeed need to engage specialist advice on this. Joenne Eley concluded this topic, noting that it seemed odd for OTC to pay Napier to issue tickets, with Napier also keeping the resulting fines.
    Olney Centre
    OTC is seeking quotes to address an issue where an Olney Centre outbuilding’s roof overhangs the property boundary, with water draining into the neighbour’s garage. The unfortunate coincidence of the Centre recently reopening for bookings, only to be followed closely by the second lockdown, was noted.
    Bits ‘n’ bobs
    The Christmas lighting has been safety-checked, with the aim of hanging them on all the usual A509 lampposts, including the new ones. The tractor shed roof has been cleared of many years of debris and is no longer leaking. Allotment invoices have been sent, with payment requested via BACS transfer, though many people were still paying via cheque. Graham noted that, when paying for his wife’s allotment, the bank’s security had questioned the account’s name – a possible problem. This will be investigated.
    Market Place
    The Markets have been working well, with the numbers gradually being increased while complying with COVID regulations. However, while the Council’s wish is to keep as many traders on the Market Place as possible, lockdown has meant it may need to contact the non-essential stallholders, depending on how Government regulations pan out. QR codes for the Market Place are now displayed on lampposts, with measures taken to encourage social distancing and the wearing of masks. The Council will help promote the Market and stalls on a rota basis. Remembrance Sunday will have only a small ceremony on the Market Place, live streamed so the Public can commemorate from home. There’ll be no parade, with the expectation that only participants in the ceremony will be present, socially distanced. Peter Geary later noted that the Council was not trying to restrict people from viewing in person, it was more a matter of the lockdown restrictions - the reasons for which people could travel and leave home. The Thursday Market traders will have a special market on Sunday 13th December, closing at 3pm.
    Odds 'n' Ends
    The Council has received numerous compliments on its Community News publication, for example “The newsletter looks good and definitely puts OTC on a professional footing.” Andrea and Jeremy thanked Councillors for helping deliver it. The Council’s Risk Management Policy and Plan has been compiled, reviewed by the Finance Committee, recommended to full Council, then adopted.
    Public participation
    If you would like to be identified as the originator of any correspondence to that meeting in the Mercury report please contact the Phonebox at editor@phoneboxmagazine.com.
    COVID Crisis Meetings
    For the duration of the COVID crisis meetings of Olney Town Council will be held as online audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings and view the presentations by clicking on a link on the OTC web page www. olneytowncouncil.gov.uk Click on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scroll down to the announcement about the next meeting where you will find a link to the agenda and another to join the meeting. A recording will also be available for a few days following the meeting.
    Public participation
    In the absence of the opportunity to speak at public meetings the public may submit written items to the clerk to be read out. Mercury would normally name those who speak at an open meeting unless they specifically ask not to be identified. Under the new regime the clerk redacts the names from any correspondence and official minutes, although the authors can request that their names are published in the Mercury report. Only one such request has been received this month, so Mercury assumes that all other correspondents prefer to remain anonymous. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings said there were six emails to be read. The first email was missed from last month’s meeting for which Jeremy apologised. The email was requesting that OTC produce a Town Plan which would have a wider scope than the existing Neighbourhood Plan. Jeremy explained that this would be discussed as an agenda item later in the meeting. The next email was regarding rubbish bags being put out on the High Street as early as Thursday evening. The correspondent thought this unhygienic and liable to encourage vermin and stated that bags should be put out no earlier than 5pm on Sunday evening. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that the issue had been reported to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) and Clerk Andrea Vincent said that any resident with similar concerns could report them via the MKC portal. The email also expressed concern about vehicles speeding on the High Street and said that traffic calming would be most welcome. The third email was concerning the use of the OTC land east of the allotments where, according to the correspondent, OTC is considering granting permission for a football training pitch. The Allotment Association are in the process of submitting a proposal for an orchard to the west of the field and hope that the rest of the field can be left as an eco-friendly wildflower meadow. This would be better for the environment and would help reduce Olney’s carbon footprint as it would not require mechanised mowing, bearing in mind the council’s declared Climate Emergency.  Considerable justification for this proposal was listed and the correspondent concluded by saying that in time the area could become an attractive and tranquil area. Later in the meeting Desmond Eley said that there had been no council resolution to change the use of the field from wild meadow whilst there was no other demand for its use but as the town develops there is a greater demand for sports pitches. Any such change would be discussed by the Development Group he said. Creating wild meadows is expensive in itself because it needs to be cut by heavy machinery and the mowings removed twice a year to stop them rotting down and fertilizing the land. This, plus loss of rental from the sports pitch would be a great expense to the council. The majority of OTC-owned land, consisting of Barnfield and The Goosey, is already wild meadow he said. The cutting is necessary because the land has been found to be very high in nutrients, having been over-fertilised. It will take at least five years of cutting and mowing to make it suitable as wild meadow. Peter Geary said in his expert opinion it would be decades before the land could become wild meadow as the nutrient level is well above that of even agricultural land. Such nutrients do not leach away and can only be removed by continual growing and cutting, he said, and all that would grow in the meantime are pernicious weeds such as thistles and nettles.  The fourth email appeared to be from the Allotment Association stating that the lock on the eco toilets had been damaged and hoped that this “wasn’t the work of the person who quoted the allotment toilets at the previous meeting” in an email regarding access to the toilets by allotment holders that are not members of the association. The toilets had been erected by a lottery grant and fundraising by the association, not OTC, the correspondent said and were maintained solely by the association. To change the management to OTC control would set a precedent to other organisations in the town. Jeremy said that there were no plans to do this as the facility was for allotment ‘users’ only although there seemed some confusion as the original debate had been around access to the toilets by non-members of the association. The fifth email related to the discussion at last month’s meeting re plots of land that have recently been identified as belonging to OTC and the possibility of creating a Community Land Trust for local housing. The correspondent requested confirmation that the land would be gifted without charge or any element of retained council ownership and asked why OTC would require council representation on the trust when such a trust’s activities are legally defined. Jeremy explained that this would be discussed later in the meeting. The last email, also relating to the plots of land asked that OTC draw up a map of all of them and displayed in the Olney Centre so that residents could use it as a reference source, since there is a great deal of interest in the matter. David Pibworth has contacted The Phonebox and asked to be identified as the originator of this email.
    Planning matters
    An application has been made for an extension to a house in Stonepit Close and a neighbour has raised an objection. The extension will extend up to the boundary of a shared driveway which Steve Clark agreed with the objector’s opinion that it might make access to other properties difficult for larger vehicles and will reduce the amount of car parking space available from four to two, due to relocation of the parking space to the front of the property. Steve also agreed with the objector that the extension would also have an impact on the nature of the cul-de-sac.  Chris Tennant expressed concern that this might be a breach of MKC’s off-street parking standards and could lead to additional roadway parking. Peter Geary agreed and recommended that the MKC Planning officer was made aware of this concern and it was agreed to write to MKC accordingly. Chris Tennant gave an update on five detailed planning applications concerning the mixed commercial development on Wellingborough Road, being marketed as Olney Park by Angle Properties. The plans include a 66-bed care home, a hotel, car showroom, office space, industrial units and a nursery. The applications dealt with infrastructure and access, drainage, phasing, and relocation of elements from outline planning permission. Colin Rodden reminded councillors that the council had had previous dealing with Angle Properties on the ‘Sainsbury’s’ site which had resulted in the company gaining planning permission for residential development on the site in contravention of the Neighbourhood Plan (NP). Could they do the same thing on this site, he asked?  Chris replied that the plans being considered were compliant with the NP and there was nothing to indicate otherwise. Peter Geary said that now the principle of development on the site had been determined there is nothing to stop Angle Properties coming back at a later date with a different application. A much-guarded discussion followed and there seemed to be deep suspicion that this might happen so Chris Tennant suggested that the applicant be asked the question. The next application was regarding the 250-home development on Yardley Road by Taylor Wimpey and Bovis Homes. The applicants had originally requested permission for a temporary off-site construction compound to the north of the site, but OTC had objected because it was outside of the agreed settlement boundary of the town in a farmer’s field. This had been withdrawn and replaced by a request for split compounds within the planning application boundary (but closer to existing homes, noted Mercury). The original construction access was to be along the farmer’s track to the rear of properties in Woodpits Lane, which OTC had objected to, and that has now been amended to move further away from those properties.
    Parking outside Olney Infant Academy
    As a school governor, Jeremy Rawlings introduced this item to note complaints from residents of Spinney Hill Road about inconsiderate parking by some parents dropping off and collecting children from school. He said he had been contacted by two residents, one of them an on-call emergency worker, who had suffered verbal abuse when challenging motorists who had parked across their driveway. Jeremy said the school had regularly sent out letters to parents asking them not to block driveways, which usually worked for a while but then the problem reoccurred. He said he had asked the PCSOs to visit the area and encouraged residents to report any instances of abuse to the police. Steve Clark, as an ex-governor, said in the past parents had been asked to use the old car park on the other side of Spinney Hill Road. It would probably worth the school including a map to show the location of the old car park in any letters, he thought. Andrea Vincent reported that emergency repairs are required to two walls at the Olney Centre, which have become very dilapidated, partly because previous repairs had not been performed correctly. It appears that cement had been used, so quotes were being obtained for a ‘dry stone wall’ repair. There is considerable variation in the quotes and a rather confused conversation followed so Desmond Eley suggested that the quotes be documented in a clear and concise way and revisited at the January meeting, which was agreed. The Olney Centre heating is in need of some urgent maintenance. A leak occurred under the floor of the pre-school and when it was fixed the heating for much of the rest of the building was found to be ‘unserviceable’. The work will require the re-routing of some of pipework to now be exposed above the floor and there was concern that they would need some sort of protection for safety reasons. Andrea said that they would be lagged rather than boxed in because the number of bends meant that there would need to be several access points. Colin Rodden was concerned that this would look rather ‘industrial’ bearing in mind that the centre is used for weddings and other events. Again, there is a huge variation in the quotations. The cheapest was considerably cheaper than the rest but was from a reputable company with several testimonials. Paul Collins suspected that heating companies in general were busy at present and inflated quotes might have been provided. It was agreed to accept the cheapest quote subject to detailed investigation.
    Covid Marshall Plan
    Andrea Vincent presented a plan to use funding from central government, via MKC, to deploy COVID Marshals in the town whose role would be to chiefly serve as a friendly and reassuring face in public places, providing advice and guidance to the public. Some would be deployed at weekend evenings when footfall to hospitality venues is at its busiest. They will be tasked with visiting pubs and other hospitality establishments to check that COVID-19 Secure measures are in place. Actions would include checking whether pubs have door staff to manage entry and exit, checking whether social distancing measures were in place in businesses, ensuring that track and trace customer information collection was taking place, and noting any large gatherings. The role would strictly one of observation and advice, and marshals would be not authorised to intervene in issues of enforcement. The intention was to use existing OTC groundsmen plus public volunteers, including OTC councillors. Joanne Eley observed that the marshals would be powerless, and many police forces were baffled by the role. It could give rise to confrontational situations and no amount of guidance would modify the behaviour of those who did not want to comply. Is Olney in need of this, she asked? Having consulted local retailers, they felt the money would be better spent proving masks and hand sanitisers she said. A long discussion took place and no member expressed support for the scheme, although Colin Rodden thanked Andrea and Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy for their work in producing plan. Paul Collins observed that the Olney Covid Support Group had 300 volunteers so surely they could provide 10 for this, if required? He would not want to use the already overstretched council ground staff as marshals, he said. Eventually it was decided that OTC would invite volunteers from other organisations fulfil the role but would not be providing resource itself. The funding would be used to obtain items such as high viz vests, masks and hand sanitiser which would be passed to the volunteers to use and distribute.
    OTC Strategic Plan
    Jeremy Rawlings introduced the draft plan, saying that it is a plan to provide a medium to long term vison of where the council want to be in three to six years’ time and how they want to engage with the public. Desmond Eley thought it ‘a good starter for ten’ and suggested that councillors take time to read and review it and then bring back to a future meeting. Mercury observed that this document was more of a plan for the council, rather than a plan for the town which had been requested in the email from the resident discussed in Public Participation.
    Town Clerk’s report
    Andrea presented the report, noting that the ground staff are fully employed at present. Colin Rodden enquired if there is any intention to employ more staff as he was concerned that they might be overloaded. As chair of Recs and Services Desmond Eley said he regularly spoke to the staff who were happy with the workload and any additional seasonal work would be covered by contractors.  The recreation ground toilets have been vandalised for the third time in as many weeks at apparently the same time of day each time. Repairs are costing around £200 each time and it is unlikely that the council’s insurers will continue to cover the repair costs without a hike in premiums so Andrea suggested that the toilets should be closed at lunch time. A discussion took place as to how the vandalism could be prevented, including use of CCTV, but eventually it was agreed that they should be closed at lunchtime.
    Freedom of Information Act 2000 request
    Joanne Eley thanked the staff for being ‘fantastic’ in supporting the town and councillors during the pandemic. In her HR report she said that social media and ‘local press’ comment regarding lack of response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request was a misrepresentation of the situation. The council office has replied and complied, she said and the ICO have been consulted and the matter is now closed. The complainant had been advised and had the right to appeal but did not appear to have done so, she said. Mercury has subsequently found what appears to be the Decision Notice on the ICO website under ref No IC-52639-C8L9 which indicates otherwise. The notice sets out in considerable detail the correspondence between all parties and concludes:
    Freedom of Information Act 2000 request Evidence
    Therefore, from the evidence presented to the Commissioner in this case, she does not consider that the Council provided a FOIA-compliant response to the request within 20 working days, the Council has thus breached section 10 of the FOIA. The next meeting will be held online on Monday 4th January, at 7.00pm. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk If you would like to be identified as the originator of any correspondence to that meeting in the Mercury report please contact The Phonebox at Editor@ phoneboxmagazine.com.
    -----
     
    Mercury's reports that were available in 2021
    Mercury's reports for December 2020 (as printed in our January 2021edition)
    January 2021 edition (December 2020 report)
    COVID Crisis Meetings For the duration of the COVID crisis meetings of Olney Town Council will be held as online audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings and view the presentations by clicking on a link on the OTC web page www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk Click on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scroll down to the announcement about the next meeting where you will find a link to the agenda and another to join the meeting. A recording will also be available for a few days following the meeting. Public participation In the absence of the opportunity to speak at public meetings, the public may submit written items to the clerk to be read out. Mercury would normally name those who speak at an open meeting unless they specifically ask not to be identified. Under the new regime the clerk redacts the names from any correspondence and official minutes, although the authors can request that their names are published in the Mercury report. Only one such request has been received this month, so Mercury assumes that all other correspondents prefer to remain anonymous. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings said there were six emails to be read. The first email was missed from last month’s meeting for which Jeremy apologised. The email was requesting that OTC produce a Town Plan which would have a wider scope than the existing Neighbourhood Plan. Jeremy explained that this would be discussed as an agenda item later in the meeting. The next email was regarding rubbish bags being put out on the High Street as early as Thursday evening. The correspondent thought this unhygienic and liable to encourage vermin and stated that bags should be put out no earlier than 5 pm on Sunday evening. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that the issue had been reported to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) and Clerk Andrea Vincent said that any resident with similar concerns could report them via the MKC portal. The email also expressed concern about vehicles speeding on the High Street and said that traffic calming would be most welcome. The third email was concerning the use of the OTC land east of the allotments where, according to the correspondent, OTC is considering granting permission for a football training pitch. The Allotment Association are in the process of submitting a proposal for an orchard to the west of the field and hope that the rest of the field can be left as an eco-friendly wildflower meadow. This would be better for the environment and would help reduce Olney’s carbon footprint as it would not require mechanised mowing, bearing in mind the council’s declared Climate Emergency. Considerable justification for this proposal was listed and the correspondent concluded by saying that in time the area could become an attractive and tranquil area. Later in the meeting, Desmond Eley said that there had been no council resolution to change the use of the field from wild meadow whilst there was no other demand for its use but as the town develops there is a greater demand for sports pitches. Any such change would be discussed by the Development Group he said. Creating wild meadows is expensive in itself because it needs to be cut by heavy machinery and the mowings removed twice a year to stop them rotting down and fertilising the land. This, plus the loss of rental from the sports pitch would be a great expense to the council. The majority of OTC-owned land, consisting of Barnfield and The Goosey, is already wild meadow he said. The cutting is necessary because the land has been found to be very high in nutrients, having been over-fertilised. It will take at least five years of cutting and mowing to make it suitable as wild meadow. Peter Geary said in his expert opinion it would be decades before the land could become wild meadow as the nutrient level is well above that of even agricultural land. Such nutrients do not leach away and can only be removed by continual growing and cutting, he said, and all that would grow in the meantime are pernicious weeds such as thistles and nettles. The fourth email appeared to be from the Allotment Association stating that the lock on the eco toilets had been damaged and hoped that this “wasn’t the work of the person who quoted the allotment toilets at the previous meeting” in an email regarding access to the toilets by allotment holders that are not members of the association. The toilets had been erected by a lottery grant and fundraising by the association, not OTC, the correspondent said and were maintained solely by the association. To change the management to OTC control would set a precedent to other organisations in the town. Jeremy said that there were no plans to do this as the facility was for allotment ‘users’ only although there seemed some confusion as the original debate had been around access to the toilets by non-members of the association. The fifth email related to the discussion at last month’s meeting re plots of land that have recently been identified as belonging to OTC and the possibility of creating a Community Land Trust for local housing. The correspondent requested confirmation that the land would be gifted without charge or any element of retained council ownership and asked why OTC would require council representation on the trust when such a trust’s activities are legally defined. Jeremy explained that this would be discussed later in the meeting. The last email, also relating to the plots of land asked that OTC draw up a map of all of them and displayed in the Olney Centre so that residents could use it as a reference source, since there is a great deal of interest in the matter. David Pibworth has contacted The Phonebox and asked to be identified as the originator of this email. Planning matters An application has been made for an extension to a house in Stonepit Close and a neighbour has raised an objection. The extension will extend up to the boundary of a shared driveway which Steve Clark agreed with the objector’s opinion that it might make access to other properties difficult for larger vehicles and will reduce the amount of car parking space available from four to two, due to relocation of the parking space to the front of the property. Steve also agreed with the objector that the extension would also have an impact on the nature of the cul-de-sac. Chris Tennant expressed concern that this might be a breach of MKC’s off-street parking standards and could lead to additional roadway parking. Peter Geary agreed and recommended that the MKC Planning officer was made aware of this concern and it was agreed to write to MKC accordingly. Chris Tennant gave an update on five detailed planning applications concerning the mixed commercial development on Wellingborough Road, being marketed as Olney Park by Angle Properties. The plans include a 66-bed care home, a hotel, car showroom, office space, industrial units and a nursery. The applications dealt with infrastructure and access, drainage, phasing, and relocation of elements from outline planning permission. Colin Rodden reminded councillors that the council had had previous dealing with Angle Properties on the ‘Sainsbury’s’ site which had resulted in the company gaining planning permission for residential development on the site in contravention of the Neighbourhood plan (NP). Could they do the same thing on this site, he asked? Chris replied that the plans being considered were compliant with the NP and there was nothing to indicate otherwise. Peter Geary said that now the principle of development on the site had been determined there is nothing to stop Angle Properties coming back at a later date with a different application. A much-guarded discussion followed and there seemed to be deep suspicion that this might happen so Chris Tennant suggested that the applicant be asked the question.  The next application was regarding the 250-home development on Yardley Road by Taylor Wimpey and Bovis Homes. The applicants had originally requested permission for a temporary off-site construction compound to the north of the site, but OTC had objected because it was outside of the agreed settlement boundary of the town in a farmer’s field. This had been withdrawn and replaced by a request for split compounds within the planning application boundary (but closer to existing homes, noted Mercury). The original construction access was to be along the farmer’s track to the rear of properties in Woodpits Lane, which OTC had objected to, and that has now been amended to move further away from those properties. Parking outside Olney Infant Academy As a school governor, Jeremy Rawlings introduced this item to note complaints from residents of Spinney Hill Road about inconsiderate parking by some parents dropping off and collecting children from school. He said he had been contacted by two residents, one of them an on-call emergency worker, who had suffered verbal abuse when challenging motorists who had parked across their driveway. Jeremy said the school had regularly sent out letters to parents asking them not to block driveways, which usually worked for a while but then the problem reoccurred. He said he had asked the PCSOs to visit the area and encouraged residents to report any instances of abuse to the police. Steve Clark, as an ex-governor, said in the past parents had been asked to use the old car park on the other side of Spinney Hill Road. It would probably be worth the school including a map to show the location of the old car park in any letters, he thought. Andrea Vincent reported that emergency repairs are required to two walls at the Olney Centre, which have become very dilapidated, partly because previous repairs had not been performed correctly. It appears that cement had been used, so quotes were being obtained for a ‘dry stone wall’ repair. There is considerable variation in the quotes and a rather confused conversation followed so Desmond Eley suggested that the quotes be documented in a clear and concise way and revisited at the January meeting, which was agreed. The Olney Centre heating is in need of some urgent maintenance. A leak occurred under the floor of the pre-school and when it was fixed the heating for much of the rest of the building was found to be ‘unserviceable’. The work will require the re-routing of some of pipework to now be exposed above the floor and there was concern that they would need some sort of protection for safety reasons. Andrea said that they would be lagged rather than boxed in because the number of bends meant that there would need to be several access points. Colin Rodden was concerned that this would look rather ‘industrial’ bearing in mind that the centre is used for weddings and other events. Again, there is a huge variation in the quotations. The cheapest was considerably cheaper than the rest but was from a reputable company with several testimonials. Paul Collins suspected that heating companies in general were busy at present and inflated quotes might have been provided. It was agreed to accept the cheapest quote subject to detailed investigation.  Covid Marshall plan Andrea Vincent presented a plan to use funding from central government, via MKC, to deploy COVID Marshals in the town whose role would be to chiefly serve as a friendly and reassuring face in public places, providing advice and guidance to the public. Some would be deployed on weekend evenings when footfall to hospitality venues is at its busiest. They will be tasked with visiting pubs and other hospitality establishments to check that COVID-19 Secure measures are in place. Actions would include checking whether pubs have door staff to manage entry and exit, checking whether social distancing measures were in place in businesses, ensuring that track and trace customer information collection was taking place, and noting any large gatherings. The role would be strictly one of observation and advice, and marshals would be not authorised to intervene in issues of enforcement. The intention was to use existing OTC groundsmen plus public volunteers, including OTC councillors. Joanne Eley observed that the marshals would be powerless, and many police forces were baffled by the role. It could give rise to confrontational situations and no amount of guidance would modify the behaviour of those who did not want to comply. Is Olney in need of this, she asked? Having consulted local retailers, they felt the money would be better spent proving masks and hand sanitisers she said. A long discussion took place and no member expressed support for the scheme, although Colin Rodden thanked Andrea and Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy for their work in producing plan. Paul Collins observed that the Olney Covid Support Group had 300 volunteers so surely they could provide 10 for this, if required? He would not want to use the already overstretched council ground staff as marshals, he said. Eventually, it was decided that OTC would invite volunteers from other organisations to fulfil the role but would not be providing resource itself. The funding would be used to obtain items such as high viz vests, masks and hand sanitiser which would be passed to the volunteers to use and distribute. OTC Strategic Plan Jeremy Rawlings introduced the draft plan, saying that it is a plan to provide a medium to long term vision of where the council want to be in three to six years’ time and how they want to engage with the public. Desmond Eley thought it ‘a good starter for ten’ and suggested that councillors take time to read and review it and then bring back to a future meeting. Mercury observed that this document was more of a plan for the council, rather than a plan for the town which had been requested in the email from the resident discussed in Public Participation. Town Clerk’s report Andrea presented the report, noting that the ground staff are fully employed at present. Colin Rodden enquired if there is any intention to employ more staff as he was concerned that they might be overloaded. As chair of Recs and Services Desmond Eley said he regularly spoke to the staff who were happy with the workload and any additional seasonal work would be covered by contractors.  The recreation ground toilets have been vandalised for the third time in as many weeks at apparently the same time of day each time. Repairs are costing around £200 each time and it is unlikely that the council’s insurers will continue to cover the repair costs without a hike in premiums so Andrea suggested that the toilets should be closed at lunch time. A discussion took place as to how the vandalism could be prevented, including use of CCTV, but eventually it was agreed that they should be closed at lunchtime. Freedom of Information Act 2000 request Joanne Eley thanked the staff for being ‘fantastic’ in supporting the town and councillors during the pandemic. In her HR report she said that social media and ‘local press’ comment regarding the lack of response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request was a misrepresentation of the situation. The council office has replied and complied, she said and the ICO have been consulted and the matter is now closed. The complainant had been advised and had the right to appeal but did not appear to have done so, she said.  If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk  If you would like to be identified as the originator of any correspondence to that meeting in the Mercury report please contact The Phonebox at: editor@phoneboxmagazine.com.
    unknown
    unknown


    unknown


    Mercury report for the Council Meeting of January 2021 as printed in our February edition
    January 2021 Meeting
    Public access to meetings For the duration of the COVID-19 restrictions, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be held online as audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by surfing to the OTC web page, www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, clicking on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scrolling down to the announcement about the next meeting, where there’ll be one link to the agenda and another to join the meeting listen-only. If you would like to be identified in the Mercury report as the originator of any correspondence read out, please contact Phonebox Magazine  at editor@phoneboxmagazine.com. Public participation The first communication was entitled “Amazing Olney Heritage Trail”. Organised by the Archaeological Society, Cowper and Newton Museum, Olney Circular Walk, and Olney and District History Society, this is a project to make Olney’s history more accessible to the community. It may also encourage visitors to spend more time in the town, exploring local shops and businesses. The proposed project aims to make a trail around the town, signed by informative interpretation panels, accompanied by a downloadable map of the trail and, hopefully, also QR-code driven facilities. The groups involved would part-fund the project and offer their time and expertise, and it was hoped the Council would fund the approx. £15,000 cost. Recognising that money was tight at the moment, the letter noted that the time feels right for the town to come together around a project which would “shine a light” and look to the future. The second item read “Dear Mr. Mayor, I would like to ask again why your Council has not met their obligation under the Local Government Transparency Code. There is a requirement to publish, on a quarterly basis, details of all tenders and contracts exceeding £5,000 and all items of expenditure exceeding £500. I should like to be identified as the author of this request. My understanding is that NALC guidance states that members of the public speaking at meetings should be named in the minutes. Finally, I would welcome details of your response to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) ruling IC-52639-C8L9, as referenced in the January Phonebox Mercury report, as I don’t see it on the agenda for the January meeting.” Jeremy commented on the main three points this raised: • Re the obligations under the Local Government Transparency Code, OTC does publish on a quarterly basis all tenders and contracts exceeding £5,000, but there hadn’t been one for some considerable time. However, one had been awarded in December, for heating repairs in the Olney Centre, and that would appear on the website in due course. Re items of expenditure, the Council was a little behind with publishing these, but they will become available on the website. Remote working and resulting lack of access are presenting additional challenges currently. • Re the contributor being named in the minutes, Jeremy said he couldn’t find anything in the NALC guidance stating members of the public should be named in the minutes. OTC had also taken advice from other Councils, none of whom name public speakers in their minutes. If the meetings were taking place physically, the contributor would obviously be able to identify themselves but, again, their identity would not be included in the minutes. OTC believes this is the correct and proper way to handle this, compliant with GDPR regulations. • Finally, OTC believes it has fully responded to the ICO ruling. The information on the Information Commissioner’s website is not complete and OTC would be taking the matter up, citing additional emails and exchanges it’d since had with the ICO, which conclude this ruling. Again, he said, the ruling is not complete on the website. This would be dealt with over the next week or so. Declarations of interest Desmond Eley declared an interest in a later item on wall repairs, one of those who’d submitted a tender being a personal friend. Graham Harrison declared an interest in the Community Orchard item, his wife having an allotment in the town. Allotment Field Community Orchard The Council had received a proposal from the Olney Allotment Association for the creation of a Community Orchard. Graham Harrison outlined the proposal. The Allotment Association proposed to apply for planning permission to plant a Community Orchard consisting of heritage apple trees on a strip of land, approx. 150m x 12m, adjacent to and East of the allotments, naming the Orchard “Amazing Grace” in support of the 250th anniversary celebrations due in 2023. In addition, it proposed to support the continued management and rewilding of the remaining Allotment Field as a wildflower meadow. It believed the resulting space would be a great asset for the community. The Orchard, estimated creation cost around £5,000, would not result in a cost to OTC – the Allotment Association is raising its own funds. The Orchard would be fenced, and have a footpath through it with seating and display boards. Graham proposed and Steve Clark seconded that OTC support this proposal. Jeremy Rawlings asked whether that the proposal was effectively asking OTC for the use of the land, which Graham confirmed. Desmond Eley, in favour of the proposal, wanted to check whether this land could in fact be used for an orchard instead of allotments. Chris Tenant and Peter Geary did not think there would be any planning issues, Chris noting that the Orchard did not represent an Eastern limit to the allotments – if the area did expand, it’d simply have a strip of orchard within it. Colin Rodden asked if community consultation was required before moving forward. Jeremy felt this was not needed, the strip already being allotment land. Also, as noted by Joanne Eley, the proposal had effectively come from the community, with the community, specifically the Allotment Association, having done all the work. Peter Geary noted that the high level of fertility in the Allotment Field would make it difficult to establish a wildflower meadow for a significant time – a plan to strip nutrient out of the soil would be required. Desmond asked whether, given the history of the site as a football pitch, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) might expect parking to be provided. Peter Geary did not think this would be the case – people would walk to an orchard. Councillors voted unanimously in favour of this proposal. Town Meeting The Town meeting is proposed to be held online, Friday 16th April. The Council is working with its IT provider, hoping to give the public the opportunity to ask questions live during the meeting. The proposed date necessarily falls before that of the next local elections, Thursday 6th May, with the first meeting of the resulting new Council Monday 10th May. Wall repairs Three walls, one at the Olney Centre and two the Cemetery, required emergency repair and three quotes had been obtained. MKC has a duty to maintain the Cemetery walls, had seen the quotes and said it’d be happy to pay its part of whichever OTC chose. Andrea Vincent, Town Clerk, believed MKC had previously had work done poorly, requiring remedial work, and was thus keen to have this repair done properly. Desmond Eley believed that Quote B, the most expensive, was for significantly more work than the others, this difference in scope making it hard to judge value for money. Andrea explained that all three companies had visited site, judged the work required and come to different conclusions. She felt the company which had judged the most work to be required had included work to stabilise the whole wall concerned, rather than addressing only the specific issue requested. After some time spent discussing these differences, Desmond noting the quandary over job scope and that he was no expert in wall repair, Andrea felt it was a choice between having the job done completely and lasting a long time, or partially with more work required soon after as a result. Peter Geary noted that most of the variability between the quotes was in fact for the Cemetery walls, which MKC would pay for – the variability for the Olney Centre walls was very much less. Peter also felt that Quote B, while not the cheapest, would be the most economically advantageous over time. Desmond, noting that he’d earlier declared an interest, meaning his hands were tied, felt Quote B gave the best value provided the resulting quality of work was good. Jeremy proposed, Peter seconded and Councillors voted unanimously to accept Quote B, Desmond abstaining. Returning Exclusive Rights of Burial Jeremy explained that this item had arisen because a member of the public had previously purchased an Exclusive Right of Burial (EROB) and now wanted to return it and receive money back. EROBs reserve a physical space in which to be buried, Olney’s issued in perpetuity. The rarity of someone wishing to return one meant there was no existing policy on the issue. Opting not to allow the EROB’s return would lead to a space between graves which could not be used. Steve Clark felt the Council should allow return, with the money back allowing for a handling charge to reflect the administrative work involved. Demand for EROBs would be ongoing, so it would not be hard to sell the space. Peter suggested the refund be 80% of the original purchase price. Paul Collins asked whether the administration required was significant, Andrea replying not. Colin felt the handling charge must not result in profit for the Council. After further discussion, Peter proposed, Desmond seconded and Councillors voted unanimously in favour of a policy allowing EROBs to be returned, refunding 80% of the price paid at purchase. Olney Town Council Strategic Plan Jeremy thanked Desmond for his work on the plan, and thoroughly recommended adopting it. Desmond, noting he’d taken the original supplied by Andrea and adapted it, thanked Jeremy for his feedback. Desmond asked if Councillors should vote to accept the plan as a draft, which the newly elected Council could then choose whether to adopt, or to adopt the plan, which the new Council could then decide what to do with. Peter suggested the latter would be the best policy, with a caveat that the six month rule should not apply, meaning the new Council, likely elected in May, could change it immediately if it saw fit. Steve felt the Council should adopt it in principle, with the suggestion it be reviewed annually. Desmond proposed, Jeremy seconded and Councillors voted unanimously to adopt the plan in principle, with the suggestion it be reviewed annually. It would be published shortly for all to see. Town Clerk’s Report A small water heater in the Pre School has leaked onto a hand drier, both having to be replaced. Works to update the Olney Centre heating system have been commissioned and will start Monday 11th January. The Markets continue to take place, each subject to the COVID restrictions in place at the time, although the January Farmers’ Market would not take place due to insufficient traders willing to attend. The ground staff continue to mow the grass – unusually, it had not been cold enough to pause its growth. The public toilets remain open, and the vandalism has abated. Graham noted the poor state of the fence between the allotments and the Allotment Field. While Andrea noted the Council was due to look at this, Graham felt it should be regarded in the context of the Community Orchard work, which itself included fencing there. A complaint had been received about a malicious Facebook post. Finally, Andrea concluded by noting a compliment received from a Market trader about how the Council was supporting the markets through the ups and downs of the COVID regulations.  Joanne asked if it was correct that the Council had received several letters from the complainant associated with the ICO ruling. Andrea confirmed, noting the same complainant had been responsible for more than one ICO request. Joanne noted her concern about this. She then asked if the malicious Facebook post was the one recently discussed on social media. Andrea confirmed it was, noting the Council had posted a Christmas letter, under which a malicious follow-up comment had been posted under the Council’s Facebook account, thus suggesting it formed part of the Council’s Christmas message. It did not. The Council’s IT support is following this up, including tracking the IP address via which the post was made. Referring to the ICO request, Peter felt the Council should respond as the law says it should and, if it feels it has done, the Council’s job is completed. If the complainant is not satisfied, it is for them to take it up with the ICO, which may then choose to contact the Council again. He also noted that a person may make as many requests as they want. Re the Facebook post, once the person is identified, he felt they needed to be reported to the authorities, their actions being a clear breach of the law for which they deserved the consequences. Statement of Expenditure Here, Councillors had the chance to review the Statement of Expenditure. Paul questioned an £825 payment of professional fees to EMW Law, included under Administration / Legal fees. Andrea explained this was for a Human Resources (HR) issue, Paul feeling it should thus be included under HR Support. Paul also noted a couple of oddities in the Staff section, with two Pension charges rather than the expected one, and some maths related to staff salaries not adding up. These were felt due to administrative issues, which will be corrected. Desmond queried the £350 charge for Olney Centre / Electricity, given that the Centre was closed, asking if perhaps it was due to drying out costs following the heating leak. Andrea confirmed this, the drying out requiring five large dehumidifiers running continuously, some of the cost also due to portable electric heaters being used in place of the central heating. Paul asked whether the drying out costs were being covered under the insurance payout due to the leak, Andrea saying she’d check. Development Group update Chris Tenant reported that Angle Properties had given a useful presentation of their emerging proposals for the site off Warrington Road. Angle is looking to implement the outline planning permission granted in 2017, bringing this forward on a phased basis: infrastructure, employment, then a care home. Peter Geary explained that a stakeholder group had been set up by MKC to solve issues between OTC and a number of nearby residents, and the developer of the Aspreys site. The pre-Christmas flooding issue which affected, amongst other places, the Aspreys - Yardley Road - Driftway roundabout, and a section of Driftway to its North East, was discussed. As a result, on Christmas Eve, the developer dug a number of ponds on site, improving the situation should that much rain occur again in such short order. Peter explained that roads, gardens and garages had been flooded, but no homes. There was also a ditch between the old and newer parts of the Aspreys development, the drainage of which had never been properly finished. This must be resolved, he said, and that should happen in the next few weeks. Work on the development site had caused the flooding problem, and been admitted by the developer who was working to repair any damage caused. Chris thanked Councillors for the swift action taken when the flooding occurred. However, he noted that the flood mitigation measures taken on the site were temporary, the final works not being due for completion until April. Winter still has some way to run. Peter also discussed the Community Centre on the Aspreys development, recommending the Council appoint its own Quantity Surveyor, paid out of Section 106 monies, to ensure the proposed building offered good value for money. Desmond and Chris agreed. The next meeting will be held online on Monday 1st February, at 7.00pm. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk,  townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.

    Mercury report for the Council Meeting of February 2021 as printed in our March edition
    February 2021 meeting
    Public access to meetings For the duration of the COVID crisis, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be held as online audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings and view the presentations by clicking on a link on the OTC web page www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. Click on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scroll down to the announcement about the next meeting where you will find a link to the agenda and another to join the meeting on view/listen only.  Public Participation In the absence of the opportunity to speak at public meetings the public may submit written items to the clerk to be read out. Mercury would normally name those who speak at an open meeting unless they specifically ask not to be identified. Under the new regime the clerk redacts the names from any correspondence and official minutes, although the authors can request that their names are published in the Mercury report.  The first communication came from the organisers of the Cherry Fair requesting permission to hold the event on the Glebe Field on 26th June 2021, recognising that it may not be possible for it to take place. Permission was granted, in principle, and it was agreed that Town Clerk Andrea Vincent would progress. The second item was regarding a previous request for a Town Plan to compliment the Neighbourhood Plan. The correspondent noted that his request had seemingly been hijacked and re-presented as a Strategic Plan for OTC. It is the facilities and provisions for residents of a fast expanding town which should be under discussion and not some memoranda for councillors, he thought. This letter was also published in the February edition of The Phonebox where the author identified himself as William Parlor. Mayor Jeremy Rawlings said the request would be dealt with by the Development Committee, rather than full council. Milton Keynes Council (MKC) New Councillor Code Of Conduct Jeremy Rawlings introduced this item, explaining that OTC would need to consider a revision of their Code of Conduct as a consequence. There were a number of changes, he said, particularly around the use of social media. MKC Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that MKC was currently scrutinising the document and felt it better for that to take its course and see what recommendations came forth and then adopt them for OTC. Jeremy proposed that it should then be discussed at next month’s OTC meeting. To Agree The Budget For 2021/2022 And The Precept For information, the precept is the sum collected from residents by MKC via the Council Tax which is returned to OTC to provide local services. As Chair of Finance Paul Collins presented the budget document, explaining that it had initially been formulated by himself and Town Clerk Andrea Vincent, followed by reviews with the Chairs of budget holding committees and then a final review to full council and finance committee. He said OTC was still recovering from the effects of poor historic financial management. The council does not have significant reserves on which to fall back but progress has been made over the past two years. Notwithstanding that the level of reserves is still below the level he though prudent for an authority of OTC’s size. It was essential to set a balanced and not a deficit budget and to rebuild reserves. Regarding income and expenditure, there was the issue of the Market Place refurbishment, long term decline in income from the Sunday and Thursday markets, plus the need for OTC to pay rates on the Market Place which had previously been paid by MKC. The Olney Centre is underused, which calls into question the need for a further Community Centre on the Yardley Road development. The ‘precept base’ would show growth in the future as the current pipeline of new housing is delivered. Open space income should be ‘relatively stable’, he said, as clubs have received government support.  Provision has been made for anticipated legal costs, IT support, and the community newsletter. The cemetery costs now properly reflect the cost of cemetery maintenance, he said. £5000 per annum for the next three years has been granted to the museum for the Amazing Grace 250 year anniversary in 2022/23, the purpose of which is to encourage community groups to come forward with small-scale projects as part of those celebrations. Provision has been made for OTC by-elections, although the costs of the full-council elections in May will be paid for by MKC. Although it is difficult to budget in current circumstances Paul said that in the event of overprovision the net result would be to build up reserves so that the incoming council inherit financial stability and are able to look ahead rather than dealing with ‘legacy issues’ as had been necessary over the past two to three years.  The precept will be set at £285k which on a tax base of 2580 households equates to £110.47 per Band D household, an increase of £9.58 per annum. This equates to approximately four cups of coffee over the year which he felt residents would not begrudge. Peter Geary thanked Paul saying that OTC was very nearly bankrupt, having run a deficit for six out of seven years and used up its reserves. Desmond Eley noted that there is a considerable list of outstanding work required on the renewals and maintenance of the Olney Centre and the modest amount already earmarked plus that in the budget would not cover the full extent of the work so more would be required in future years. The budget and increase in precept were passed unanimously. Documents previously suppressed by the Council Jeremy Rawlings introduced this section saying that certain documents were originally discussed under confidential items (when press and public were excluded) and subsequent information received indicated that most should be made available to the public. Peter Geary said that OTC regularly vote to exclude press and public for reasons such as HR and other things, but it would be sensible to review to see if they are still relevant at a later date. No one could be in any doubt that problems and angst had existed within OTC over the past year or so and people had been listening to and speaking of things that only told half the story. Everyone ‘from The Phonebox down’ should be able to see as much as possible, he thought. Many documents will be straight forward and can be released immediately, but others will need some thought and advice. As part of his initial local government training he had been told that anything that would have to be provided as part of a Freedom of Information Act request should be provided straight away and not kept confidential. Some matters, such as tenders or financial information, could justifiably be kept confidential at the time but should eventually be made public he said. There are other issues that might provide residents with a wider knowledge of what has gone on, rather than ‘people’s memories, hints and talking’ he said. He proposed that the clerk review all confidential documents going back five years and any obvious one be released immediately. Any that need further discussion should be discussed in closed session prior to the public session of next month’s meeting and then the decision to release would be made in the public section with the documents being made available shortly after. It would be necessary for some documents to be redacted to remove words and names. Jeremy Rawlings supported the plan, saying that there had been ‘issues’ with the council going back ten years or more and releasing the documents would show that they were moving towards a well-run council that has proper governance and makes correct and proper decisions. This would put them in a good position to hand the reigns over to new councillors come May, he said. The proposal was seconded by Chair of HR Joanne Eley and passed unanimously. Town Clerk’s Report Andrea Vincent reported that Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy had been working through the many council contracts and had identified some duplicates that had already been cancelled and others that were no longer required, such as the franking machine, which would be cancelled when they came up for renewal. The year 2019/20 Annual Governance and Accountability Return (AGAR) was submitted on time and the figures approved by the external auditor. The supporting papers were submitted to the internal auditor but not to the external auditor because of an administrative oversight. The public right to view was properly publicized and exercised by the public.  Andrea reported that the Olney Centre is ‘showing her age’. The works to future-proof the heating system have started, although a second leak had been found. A buddleia tree has been removed from the centre chimney and the roofing contractor is looking for a leak in the roof which is causing water ingress to the centre. Work has begun on the wall at the Olney Centre. All external public toilets remain open and vandalism seems to have abated. There have been two complaints to the monitoring officer about two individual Councillors. Yardley Road development Chris Tennant reported on the monthly liaison meeting between Taylor Wimpey, Bovis Homes, OTC/MKC and local residents. The problems of deliveries to site and the temporary traffic lights on Yardley Road were amongst the matters discussed. On-site wheel washing facilities are being provided to resolve the mud being deposited on the roads. A new website has been set up to assist in communication with the local community and to enable them to have a single point of contact. A link will be provided on the OTC webpage and Facebook page, along with the Olney Noticeboard. Temporary drainage measures had been put in place following the ‘surface water drainage incident’ i.e. flooding, which occurred on Christmas Eve. The permanent drainage will not be completed until at least April. Peter Geary said that an online public meeting is due to be held to discuss the planning applications for the temporary access roads and impacted residents will be notified by post. Desmond Eley noted that one of the proposed access roads would be on Aspreys opposite the Foxhill junction. A proposal for a permanent access road on the original design had been rejected, he said, so how could a temporary access in the same place be justified? Peter replied that it was in the position of the proposed permanent footpath/cycleway/bollarded emergency access and just because a planning application had been made it did not necessarily mean it would be granted. Odds And Sods - Correction Joanne Eley reported that a Teams Meeting had been held with several shopkeepers regarding the 'Opening up the High Street’ initiative and the funding available. The shop keepers have been invited to apply for funding from OTC. The printed Mercury report for February, printed in the March edition, had the Odds and Sods section of the previous meeting (January 2020 meeting) inserted in its place. A cut and paste error which we have corrected on this on-line edition. Town Meeting The Town meeting is proposed to be held online, Friday 16th April. The Council is working with its IT provider, hoping to give the public the opportunity to ask questions live during the meeting. The proposed date necessarily falls before that of the next local elections, Thursday 6th May, with the first meeting of the resulting new Council Monday 10th May. Next Meeting The next meeting will be held online on Monday 1st March. The start time may be later than usual, due to the pre-meeting discussion on release of confidential documents. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.  If you would like to be identified in the Mercury report as the originator of any correspondence read out, please contact Phonebox Magazine at editor@phoneboxmagazine.com
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting of March 2021 as printed in our April edition
    This month’s Olney Town Council meeting was too long to report in full, so we have listed here a summary of the highlights. As the full Town Council report is available on-line those wishing to listen to the full details should go to www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk
    A full written report by our Mercury reporter can be found on our webpage: phoneboxmagazine.com. The printed magazine report has been assessed by the editor to give an overview of the meeting, describing the most important aspects, without listing every single point made. In this way readers can decide for themselves how much they want to read and in how much detail – and can draw their own conclusions on the decisions made by the Council. Public access to meetings For the duration of the COVID-19 restrictions, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be held online as audio meetings using the conferencing platform Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to proceedings by clicking on a link within the OTC web page: www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. Click on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scroll down to the announcement about the next meeting, where you’ll find one link to the agenda and another to join the meeting on view/listen only. Public participation The first letter reported the dumping of rubbish on the small island of the Goosey river stretch, noting that with recent flooding this had been an environmental disaster. OTC is in contact with the owner’s solicitors and will keep the correspondent informed of progress. The second letter, sent anonymously, expressed concern at the treatment of the Council on social media. The correspondent requested that the Council replies to the questions publicly on social media and in the local press.  Note: The Council’s reply to the above letter, posted Wednesday 3rd March, and other posts going back to at Wednesday 3rd February, provide some background to recent changes at the Council. These can be found at: facebook.com/pg/OlneyTownCouncil/posts, and can be viewed with or without a Facebook account. Public Art Louise Izod, Public Art Officer at Milton Keynes Council (MKC), gave a brief presentation on Public Art, and specifically how OTC could utilise its Section 106 monies for Public Art purposes.  Looking at Olney, her investigations suggested that around £27,000 was available to spend now, with potential for a further £233,000 in the near future. She recommended OTC seek public involvement to produce a plan. Chris Tenant explained that OTC maintains a tracker of Section 106 monies, so he would be able to help tie down what was available. He calculated the total pot of Public Art money to be about £345,000.  MKC Councillor Code of Conduct This item was to review the MKC Councillor Code of Conduct and consider its adoption in place of the current OTC Code of Conduct. Jeremy Rawlings noted that MKC was yet to approve it.  Demand-Responsive Transport proposals Jennifer Wilson-Marklew, an MKC Cabinet member with areas of responsibility including public transport, had been invited to speak concerning significant up-coming changes to bus services. A new demand-responsive, all-electric transport service called MK Connect, a mix of shared taxi and bus, will be introduced on Wednesday 31st March prior to the withdrawal of various subsidised services. The to-be-withdrawn services affecting Olney and its surrounds are no. 37, and the no. 21 Olney–Lavendon stretch. The new service may be used up to 11pm, seven days a week, where no fixed service exists or none is running at the time. The service will cost £3.50 during peak hours (7am–9am, 4.30pm–6.30pm), and £2.50 at all other times. Concessions are available, costing £1 for All in 1 MK cardholders for example, with Older Person’s and Disabled Person’s bus pass holders travelling free after 9.30am on weekdays and all day at weekends. The service will arrive within 30 minutes in urban areas, 45 minutes in rural locations, and pick-up and drop-off within 400 metres of locations requested. Once booked, users will be guaranteed a seat, and wheelchair-accessible vehicles will be available on request. Further information is available here: https://ridewithvia.com/mk-connect/, and the booking line is 01908 252526. The changes will be publicised, including posters in bus stops, leaflets posted to homes in affected areas and by Parish Councils, including Olney’s. Amendments to OTC Standing Orders Jeremy Rawlings put forward two proposals: all elected chairmen of committees must have attended chair training within six months before or after their appointment; and all members of the Finance, Human Resources and Planning Committees must attend subject-specific training within six months of appointment and then at regular intervals afterwards. Chris Tenant asked that “regular intervals” be defined, Peter Geary replied that it meant yearly, with additional training when underlying changes to the subject matter demanded it. Councillors voted unanimously in favour of these amendments. Rugby 7s tournament Olney Rugby Club has requested use of the Recreation Ground for the Rugby 7s tournament on Saturday 17th July. Permission was granted subject to COVID restrictions in place at the time, and similar conditions to those imposed in 2018. Tenders to repaint the Olney Centre interior Two quotations had been received, other companies declining to quote due to the size of the job. Of those two, only the first had quoted for all the work required, the second planning to do so in the next few days. The Council is keen to complete the decoration before the Centre reopens so, once the full second quote is received or seven days have passed, the Council will accept one of them. Town Clerk’s report The request for the up-coming year’s precept has been submitted, and documents for the Annual Governance and Accountability Return (AGAR) are being prepared. Annual staff appraisals have been put back to early in the new financial year, bar the Town Clerk’s already completed one. The Council will be testing technology to allow the annual Town Meeting, planned Friday 16th April, to be online. The Olney Centre heating works are almost complete. Work on external walls has been finished, as has that near the Church. All the Markets are taking place, the numbers of stalls being increased gradually in line with emerging COVID regulations. The Cemetery continues to function under COVID guidelines. Clerk’s report: Complaints about individual Councillors Two complaints had been looked at by Monitoring Officers, each concerning an individual Councillor and on separate matters. Both were dismissed as having no case to answer. Jeremy Rawlings concluded by explaining that, for members of the public listening to proceedings and considering standing for Council, there is a complete set of rules and regulations, a Code of Conduct, and also the OTC Standing Orders, to which Councillors are bound by law. He noted that there is a route for both public and Councillors to complain and raise issues about Councillors’ conduct, as exercised here. Clerk’s report: Complaints about the Council as a whole Andrea Vincent explained that other complaints, more general to the Council as a whole, had been received in the past year. All of these had been found to have no foundation, she said, but had caused great cost to the public purse. Another complaint was from a former member of staff who was concerned that their personal information had not been handled properly. They had become aware that OTC had disclosed information from their personal record on its website and also published the same information on its Facebook account. The Council thanked the correspondent for the letter, adding that it understood the concerns raised and said that the complainant was “within your rights to contact the ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office)”. Human Resources Committee report Joanne Eley said that an allegation – reported in the Phonebox Magazine – that HR documents had been shredded, was untrue and urged anyone with factual evidence that this had taken place to come forward to the Council, MK Council or the police, as it could be a criminal matter. Finance Committee report Paul Collins reported that the Council has allocated £5,000 per annum over three years to support the Amazing Grace 250 celebrations which, it is hoped, will take place in 2022–2023, but added that a report in the Phonebox Magazine that the money had been allocated to the town’s Museum was not accurate.  Recreations and Services Committee report Desmond Eley explained that the Town and Deputy Town Clerk have completed specific cemetery training, and are getting the records in line with current legislation. The grounds staff continued with all maintenance on open spaces except the watering of hanging baskets.  The sports pitches soil has been tested, with scientists recommending no more general fertiliser be applied for at least another five years. Public toilets have been kept open throughout most of 2020. The failure of the old Victorian underground pipe-work in the Olney Centre has been remedied and future-proofed. Planning Committee report Steve Clark reported a Planning Application related to the ‘apple store’ at the top of the lane down to the orchard in East Street. Members of the Planning Committee had been given an informal presentation by the family concerned and their developers regarding the potential development of a small part of the orchard site. This would require access from East Street – that currently existing is too narrow due to the presence of this property. A Planning Application has been lodged with MKC to remove the property, due to its poor state of repair, allowing access to any subsequent development on the orchard.  Development Group report Chris Tenant first declared an interest, living near the Aspreys / Yardley Road development. There has been concern about surface water run-off from that site, though there has been no further incident, temporary measures having been put in place by the developers. The full drainage scheme is slated for completion by April. Construction traffic routing has now been tightened. It appeared some vehicles had not followed the procedures in place: that Yardley Road and Driftway must be used to access the A509. Also, there will be further closures of Yardley Road due to associated works by Thames Water, noted on the Council’s website. Library and Museum reports Colin Rodden noted that, while Olney library is currently closed due to COVID, a click-and-collect service is available. Books can be ordered from milton-keynes.gov.uk/libraries and collected from Olney Library at times available via that page. Paul Collins noted that the Cowper and Newton Museum now has an online booking system and an online shop. It is hoped that the shop and gardens will open mid-April, and the Museum mid-to-late May, subject to the lifting of COVID restrictions. The next meeting will be held online on Monday 12th April, at 7.00pm. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. If you would like to be identified in the Mercury Report as the originator of any correspondence read out, please contact Phonebox Magazine at: editor@phoneboxmagazine.com
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting of April 2021 - taken from the on-line meetings on the web

    Olney Town Council Reports for April 2021
    Phonebox Magazine's reporter, known as Mercury, listens intently to the reports of the Olney Town Council meetings each month. The reports are printed in Phonebox. Below we have the recorded minutes of the latest Town Meeting and the Council Meeting for April.


    OLNEY TOWN COUNCILLORS (as at April 1st 2021): Chris Tennant Desmond Eley Graham Harrison Jeremy Rawlings Joanne Eley Malcolm Messenger Paul Collins Peter Geary Stephen Clark
    Audio Report for The Olney Town Meeting of Friday 16th April 2021
    The Mayor
    The Mayor, Jeremy Rawlings, welcomes residents to the meeting and informing of the ability to ask live questions during the meeting. The meeting is to consist of a factual appraisal of the council to the town by the chairs of the various committees, followed by the mayor's statement.
    Chris Tennant
    Chris Tennant, Chair of the Olney Town Council Development Group, kicked things off with his review of development around the town and the Olney Neighbourhood Plan.
    Paul Collins
    Paul Collins, Chair of the Finance Committee, informed residents of the state of the town's finances, with regard to loss of revenue due to the Covid crisis, steps taken to reduce costs and the 9.5% rise in the precept
    Joanne Eley
    Joanne Eley, Chair of Human Resources, told of the disarray, serious breaches in HR, paperwork not up to date and written contracts not being held by the council that had now been rectified.
    Stephen Clark
    Stephen Clark, Chair of Planning, gave a review of the work of planning especially since the covid virus started.
    Desmond Eley
    Desmond Eley, Chair of the Recs and Services Committee, reported on the issues facing the committee, which covered the cemetery, fields, toilets and flower displays to name but a few.
    Jeremy Rawlings
    Jeremy Rawlings gave the Mayor's report, consisting of his concern over "keyboard warriors", downright lies on social media, and warned that new councillors do not have superpowers and must be aware of the principles of the Nolan Report
    Emails and questions received from the public
    The council had received two emailed questions. One regarding development regarding traffic in the town and medical services. The other was a concern about councillors declaring freemasonry. The IT failures were questioned as was concern over the number of councillors who had resigned.
    2021 April
    Audio Report of the whole Olney Town Council Meeting April 2021


    Audio Report for Agenda Items for the Olney Council Meeting of April 2021


    The Start - A Minutes Silence for Prince Philip
    A minutes silence for Prince Philip. The Book of Condolences that is Covid Secure can be signed at the Council Offices
    Email from a citizen
    One email read out regarding the Public Arts Fund money that is available


    Apologies for Absence
    1: No Apologies for Absence - 003
    Declarations of Interests
    2: No Declarations of Interest declared on Agenda items - 004


    3. Approve the Minutes of 1st March
    3: Minutes approved after two corrections to the Minutes were offered up - 005
    4. The new CAB Advice Service Offer
    4. Information regarding the new CAB Advice Service offer agreed subject to Chris Tennant's amendment - 006


    5. To receive a report about the Allotment field from interested residents
    5. The report, being comprehensive, was passed to the Recreations and Services Committee to report on - 007
    6. To review the MKC new Councillor Code of Conduct
    6. It was said that a vote could not be taken on something the council had not seen. But it turned out the Code of Conduct had been on the agenda last month, and if no changes had been made to it, it would be voted as acceptable - 008


    7. Request to use the Recreation ground for a scaled down Riverfest
    7. Nearly 16 minutes of twists and turns resulted in a simple agreement that if the charity field were ok with it, and Covid was not a problem, it would go ahead - the "Swingometer" was really going some at this discussion - 009
    8. To agree to hold the May OTC meeting on 17th May rather than the 10th
    8. With virtual meetings not being extended the council has to decide when to have the next meeting: 24th May decided, with a fallback (sic) [fallforward] to 17th May if it's not possible on the 24th - 010


    9. To consider redesignating sub committees
    9. Sub committees have been designated advisory to allow virtual meetings to take place onliine - 011
    10. To consider a quote for the re-painting of the Library area in the Olney Centre
    10. The quote has been passed. The council are responsible for decoration, not the Library. Their is £6,000 in the Library Support fund which will be used to pay for it - 012


    11. To agree the appointment of a Quantity Surveyor to review development plans
    11. Peter stepped out of the room. The Quantity Surveyor was appointed. Payment to be claimed from Section 106 money, not from the Precept - 013
    12. To review the proposal for purchase of land at Dinglederry and consider if an independent valuation is required.
    12. This item was deferred and "kicked down the road to the new council". - 014


    13. To receive the Town Clerk's Report
    13. Precept accepted, Staffing levels busy, Shredder especially useful, Applicant for zero hours contract received. As far as the Goosey goes it's their land and they will do with it as they choose" and other general news - 015
    14. To receive an expenditure report
    14. The expenditure report covering routine stuff including a Finance Refresher Course - 016


    15. To receive reports from Chairs or Committees and Councillors who represent OTC at external meetings
    15. The Chairs or Committees and Councillors who represent OTC at external meetings Report - 017
    16. To Exclude Everyone
    16. Exclude the public and the press. Everyone was happy to do so, therefore the formal part of the public meeting ended - 019

    Olney Town Council Elections
    unknown


    unknown


    unknown


    unknown


    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting in the May 2021 edition (April Meeting)
    April Meeting
    Mayor Jeremy Rawlings opened this month’s meeting with a minute’s silence in memory of Prince Philip, and also ex-councillor Rosemary Osbourne MBE who has recently passed away. Public access to meetings For the duration of the COVID-19 restrictions, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be held online as audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by navigating to the OTC web page, www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, clicking on the ‘Meetings’ tab, then scrolling down to the announcement about the next meeting, where there will be one link to the agenda and another to join the meeting listen-only. If you would like to be identified in the Mercury report as the originator of any correspondence read out, please contact The Phonebox at editor@phoneboxmagazine.com. Public participation One letter had been received regarding last month’s Mercury report stating that OTC would be eligible to apply for £345,000 of Section 106 money for public art. The correspondent thought it ’morally irresponsible to contemplate syphoning off S106 monies for wasteful projects such as public arts’ in the current economic crisis. Jeremy Rawlings noted the comments but said producing art puts money back into the economy and believed that it had a good effect on public wellbeing. It was also a legal agreement between the developers and Milton Keynes Council (MKC) and could not easily be diverted elsewhere. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that if the money was not spent it would remain in the developer’s pocket, so it was far better that it was spent in Olney rather that being paid to their shareholders. Citizens Advice Service A document has been received from MK Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) stating how they propose to provide service in the post-Covid environment. Town Clerk Andrea Vincent reminded councillors that prior to lockdown OTC paid CAB to provide a fortnightly face to face presence in Olney. The new offer has resulted in a price increase of around £2000 per annum. In general, 80% of their support and advice service had been face to face with the remaining 20% being phone, email and webchat. During lockdown this had fallen to 5% face to face with 95% being phone, email, webchat and video calls. Post Covid it was expected that 20 to 25% would be face to face with the remainder being phone, email, webchat and video calls. Paul Collins observed that the new proposal, with increased cost, was based on a weekly service which was not currently budgeted for and felt that more clarification was required before a decision could be made. Chris Tennant said that he felt it a small price to pay to provide a professional service for people of need in the town and recommended approval so that there is no interruption in the service. Joanne Eley observed that during lockdown there had been no face to face service provided so it would be difficult to argue for an interrupted service when there had been none. Andrea said that OTC had not been charged during this period. Jeremy Rawlings questioned the need for an increased face to face presence with increased cost when the proposal was for the majority of the service to be provided remotely, which should cut their costs significantly. It was agreed to ask for the service to continue but to go back to CAB and ask them to quote for a fortnightly service, as previously agreed. This would then be discussed by the new council at their first meeting in May. Allotment Field A very detailed and comprehensive report had been received from interested residents regarding the current and future use of the field. Due to the nature and complexity of the report Jeremy Rawlings felt that it would need to go through the council process of having a sponsor/seconder and should be dealt with by the Recs and Services Committee who would make a recommendation to full council. Peter Geary agreed saying that the council needed to develop and implement a plan, bearing in mind all of the calls on the land.   MKC Councillor Code of Conduct Peter Geary confirmed that the Councillor Code of Conduct had now been adopted by MKC. Previously OTC had considered its adoption in place of the current OTC Code of Conduct, pending adoption by MKC. It was agreed to accept it in full as of 1st May so that it would be in place for the first meeting of the new council. Application for scaled-down Riverfest An email had been received from local volunteers The Olney Group (TOG) requesting permission in principle to hold a scaled down Riverfest, minus the raft race, over the weekend of 3rd & 4th July Covid restrictions permitting. Roger Mann is happy to be identified as the author of the email and this month’s Mercury reporter. Clerk Andrea Vincent said that the requested location of the Charity Field was leased to OTC by the Ann Hopkins Smith Trust and OTC as tenants will have to ask the charity if they want a commercial venture to take place. Jeremy Rawlings declared an interest as a member of the trustees. Steve Clark observed that the event had taken place for a number of years, with OTC having a presence and suggested if it went ahead this year then OTC should consider having a presence so that the public can meet and chat with councillors. Members of the trustees have regularly attended in the past and no objection had been raised so a precedent had been set, and assuming the lockdown roadmap proceeds as planned he proposed that permission in principle should be given.  Andrea Vincent said OTC had failed to request permission in the past so it was not a question of the trustees having tacitly agreed but an error on the part of the council. Desmond Eley said the lease required OTC to consider the effect of noise on nearby residents and also thought that an event where alcohol would be available was at odds with the council’s own ban on alcohol on the recreation ground, which would require the police to ‘turn a blind eye’. (For information, a Temporary Event Notice permits entertainment and alcohol sales at a location where it is not usually permitted). Jeremy Rawlings said there is a difference between ad-hoc random drinking and a properly organised event. Chris Tennant said that it is an event from the community for the benefit of the community and assuming Covid restrictions were lifted he wished to support Steve’s proposal. The town needs something to look forward to and having a cold beer down by the river at an organised event is something to look forward to, he thought. Andrea Vincent replied that OTC had no information about any rules or restrictions that TOG would set up and no information about their finances, so councillors needed to consider that they are granting a financial asset for a period of time to a group that has given no indication of how they intend to manage the event, what their finances are and what they intend to do with the money raised. Malcolm Messenger asked if ‘the company’ running the event had provided any Risk Assessment and insurance documentation. Peter Geary said that he saw no reason for the landlords to object but felt it important to check with them. Steve Clark said that TOG had confirmed that Insurance and Risk Assessments would be in place and would be reviewed and updated if the Covid situation changed. TOG usually provide a report on their activities and finances to the town at the Annual Town Meeting, he said. Malcolm Messenger asked if updated Risk Assessments could be requested should Covid still be an issue, so that the public are kept safe, but Steve Clark expressed the opinion that there was not much point since TOG had stated that the event would not take place if Covid was still an issue. It was agreed to grant the request, subject to permission from The Ann Hopkins Smith Trust being granted at their next meeting on 12th May and also to Covid restrictions being lifted. Jeremy Rawlings concluded by saying that he, for one, was quite looking forward to the event. Apologies and declarations No apologies for absence had been received, all Councillors being present. No declarations of interest were made. Library redecoration The library will be repainted by the company engaged to redecorate the rest of the Olney Centre at a cost of £6904. Malcolm Messenger asked why only one quote was being considered and Andrea Vincent said it had been missed from the original tender for the rest of the Olney Centre since although MKC lease the rooms from OTC, OTC as landlord is obliged to maintain them. Joanne Eley thought it unfortunate timing, just as the service was reopening, but Andrea said the librarian was very happy for the work to progress. Engagement of a Quantity Surveyor Jeremy Rawlings explained that this had come about due to the soaring costs of the proposed community centre on the Aspreys development and the duty of care that OTC have to get value for money. Desmond Eley said that the hall is to be funded from the developer’s S106 funding agreement with MKC but the building is not as big as OTC would like. A plan for a larger hall has been presented by the developers but they have said that it will cost twice the original amount so the suggestion has been made to transfer other funds from S106. The actual cost of the original design was not determined as an amount of money (rather an indicative cost per square metre, said Jeremy), so OTC are effectively blind. OTC need to ensure complete transparency and proper financial management with independent financial advice. Chris Tennent said that his original advice to OTC to engage a quantity surveyor was based on a need to fully understand the costs and any additional funding requirement that could be met from S106 funds transfer and other sources, such as Sport England. Speaking as the OTC rep on the Steering Group he said the developers would need to submit a reserved matters planning application for the detailed design of the new facility. Feedback had been obtained from sports clubs in the town, via the Joint User Group he said, and it was important to continue to engage the community. Andrea Vincent said that although the quote to engage the quantity surveyor was quite significant, due to the amount of work involved, she thought it could be reclaimed from the S106 funding rather than be OTC funded, which Chris Tennant confirmed. Town Clerk’s report A suitably qualified applicant has come forward for the temporary zero hours groundsman post and will be employed subject to references. The owner of a large part of the Goosey is looking to provide an alternative route for access to their land and their representative has met with the Rights of Way officer of MKC and the Town Clerk. There has been a long-standing attempt by OTC to ensure that the existing traditional footpath, which is considered far more suitable, is registered as a public right of way. The owner’s legal representative has indicated that they are keen to sell the land but as yet no proposal has been put forward. Thanks is due to the Clerk for subsequent information and clarification on this matter. A large allotment has been returned to the council and is in the process of being divided into smaller plots and allocated to those on the waiting list. Market stalls continue to increase with more non-essential traders attending. The potholes on the Market Place will be repaired by MKC with hot tar, but unfortunately the expected completion date of 12th April will not be met. Two former councillors have raised separate Standards complaints about two existing councillors. A number of compliments have been received, including for the Clerk in helping a resident with landscaping issues and supporting an A Level student with a project. Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy was thanked for helping a young person with a DofE award and for her flexibility in supporting those arranging weddings at the Olney Centre. The ground staff have been thanked for how well the town is looking. Agree the date for next meeting Jeremy Rawlings explained that currently the government roadmap for exiting lockdown allows indoor meetings to take place from 17th May, the preferred date for the first meeting of the new council, known as the Annual Meeting. However, as pointed out by Joanne Eley, the announcement would probably be made at 5:00pm on that date which would be insufficient time to organise a meeting. Additionally, the dispensation that allows council meetings to take place virtually will have expired on 1st May so meetings must take place face to face. However, regulations dictate that the first meeting of a new council must take place within two weeks of the election on 6th May, so the next preferred date of 24th May would fall outside of that statutory period. The Clerk said she was awaiting information from The National Association of Local Councils (NALC) as to whether an extension would be possible under the circumstances. A discussion followed around how a face to face meeting with public attendance could be achieved with a number of options put forward. It is likely that the council will meet in the council chamber with the meeting streamed both online and to members of the public in a separate room in the Olney Centre. It was agreed to hold the meeting on 24th May pending advice from NALC and if that is not possible to fall back to 17th May. Note: The Clerk has subsequently been advised that the two week period commences when the current council retires, which is four days after the election, so that date of 24th May is confirmed. Details of the format of the meeting and public attendance will follow. Opening the High Street Joanne Eley reported on a meeting between OTC and a sub-group of MKC who are leading the economic recovery plan, plus two reps of the local shopkeepers’ forum. Government restart grants are available, she said, which had been added to by MKC making grants available for independent retailers and a further pot for those businesses that have received no support because they fell outside of the original criteria. There is a ‘Rediscover Local’ social media campaign and MKFM will be providing free promotion for a small number of local businesses and an Olney independent shopkeeper has been invited to submit their story for a free citywide advertising feature. MKC are inviting proposals from local councils as to how they can help open their own high streets and Olney will be looking to apply for a grant to support a Unique Selling Point restart project.   The next meeting will be held on Monday 24th May, at 7.00pm, further details to follow. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.


    This was in the Phonebox April edition
    Mercury Report  This month’s Olney Town Council meeting was too long to report in full, so we have listed here a summary of the highlights. As the full Town Council report is available on-line those wishing to see full details from it should go to www.olneytowncouncil.co.uk Public transport, had been invited to speak concerning significant up-coming changes to bus services. A new demand-responsive, all-electric transport service called MK Connect, a mix of shared taxi and bus, will be introduced on Wednesday 31st March prior to the withdrawal of various subsidised services. The to-be-withdrawn services affecting Olney and its surroundings are no. 37, and the no. 21 Olney–Lavendon stretch. The new service may be used up to 11pm, seven days a week, where no fixed service exists or none is running at the time. The service will cost £3.50 during peak hours (7am–9am, 4.30pm–6.30pm), and £2.50 at all other times. Concessions are available, costing £1 for All in 1 MK cardholders for example, with Older Person’s and Disabled Person’s bus pass holders travelling free after 9.30am on weekdays and all day at weekends. The service will arrive within 30 minutes in urban areas, 45 minutes in rural locations, and pick-up and drop-off within 400 metres of locations requested. Once booked, users will be guaranteed a seat, and wheelchair-accessible vehicles will be available on request. Further information is available here: https:// ridewithvia.com/mk-connect/, and the booking line is 01908 252526. The changes will be publicised, including posters in bus stops, leaflets posted to homes in affected areas and by Parish Councils, including Olneys. Rugby 7s tournament Olney Rugby Club has requested use of the Recreation Ground for the Rugby 7s tournament on Saturday 17th July. Permission was granted subject to COVID restrictions in place at the time, and similar conditions to those imposed in 2018. Tenders to repaint the Olney Centre interior Two quotations had been received, other companies declining to quote due to the size of the job. Of those two, only the first had quoted for all the work required, the second planning to do so in the next few days. The Council is keen to complete the decoration before the Centre reopens so, once the full second quote is received or seven days have passed, the Council will accept one of them. Town Clerk’s report. The request for the up-coming year’s precept has been submitted, and documents for the Annual Governance and Accountability Return (AGAR) are being prepared. Annual staff appraisals have been put back to early in the new financial year, bar the Town Clerk’s already completed one. The Council will be testing technology to allow the annual Town Meeting, planned Friday 16th April, to be online. The Olney Centre heating works are almost complete. Work on external walls has been finished, as has that near the Church. All the Markets are taking place, the numbers of stalls being increased gradually in line with emerging COVID regulations. The Cemetery continues to function under COVID guidelines. Clerk’s report: Complaints about individual Councillors. Two complaints had been looked at by Monitoring Officers, each concerning an individual Councillor and on separate matters. Both were dismissed as having no case to answer. Jeremy Rawlings concluded by explaining that, for members of the public listening to proceedings and considering standing for Council, there is a complete set of rules and regulations, a Code of Conduct, and also the OTC Standing Orders, to which Councillors are bound by law. He noted that there is a route for both public and Councillors to complain and raise issues about Councillors’ conduct, as exercised here. Clerk’s report: Complaints about the Council as a whole Andrea explained that other complaints, more general to the Council as a whole, had been received. In the past year. All of these had been found to have no foundation, she said, but had caused great cost to the public purse. Another complaint was from a former member of staff who was concerned that their personal information had not been handled properly. They had become aware that OTC had disclosed information from their personal record on its website and also published the same information on its Facebook account. The Council thanked the correspondent for the letter, adding that it understood the concerns raised and said that the complainant was “within your rights to contact the ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office)”. Human Resources Committee report Joanne Eley said that an allegation – reported in the Phonebox Magazine – that HR documents had been shredded, was untrue and urged anyone with factual evidence that this had taken place to come forward to the Council, MK Council or the police, as it could be a criminal matter. Finance Committee report Paul Collins reported that the Council has allocated £5,000 per annum over three years to support the Amazing Grace 250 celebrations which, it is hoped, will take place in 2022–2023, but added that a report in the Phonebox Magazine that the money had been allocated to the town’s Museum was not accurate. Desmond Eley explained that the Town and Deputy Town Clerk have completed specific cemetery training, and are getting the records in line with current legislation. The grounds staff continued with all maintenance on open spaces except the watering of hanging baskets. The sports pitches soil has been tested, with scientists recommending no more general fertiliser be applied for at least another five years. Public toilets have been kept open throughout most of 2020. The failure of the old Victorian underground pipe-work in the Olney Centre has been remedied and future-proofed. Planning Committee report Steve Clark reported a Planning Application related to the ‘apple store’ at the top of the lane down to the orchard in East Street. Members of the Planning Committee had been given an informal presentation by the family concerned and their developers regarding the potential development of a small part of the orchard site. This would require access from East Street – that currently existing is too narrow due to the presence of this property. A Planning Application has been lodged with MKC to remove the property, due to its poor state of repair, allowing access to any subsequent development on the orchard. Development Group report Chris Tenant first declared an interest, living near the Aspreys / Yardley Road development. There has been concern about surface water run-off from that site, though there has been no further incident, temporary measures having been put in place by the developers. The full drainage scheme is slated for completion by April.  Construction Mercury Report traffic routing has now been tightened. It appeared some vehicles had not followed the procedures in place: that Yardley Road and Driftway must be used to access the A509. Also, there will be further closures of Yardley Road due to associated works by Thames Water, noted on the Council’s website. Library and Museum reports Colin Rodden noted that, while Olney Library is currently closed due to COVID, a click-and-collect service is available. Books can be ordered from https://www.milton- keynes.gov.uk/libraries and collected from Olney Library at times available via that page. Paul Collins noted that the Cowper and Newton Museum now has an online booking system and an online shop. It is hoped that the shop and gardens will open mid-April, and the Museum mid-to-late May, subject to the lifting of COVID restrictions. The next meeting will be held online on Monday 12th April, at 7.00pm. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@ olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. If you would like to be identified in the Mercury Report as the originator of any correspondence read out, please contact Phonebox Magazine at: editor@phoneboxmagazine.com A full written report by [our Mercury reporters] can be also be found on our webpage: phoneboxmagazine.com - The printed magazine report has been assessed by the editor to give an overview of the meeting, describing the most important aspects, without listing every single point made and every decision reached. In this way readers can decide for themselves how much they want to read and in how much detail – and can draw their own conclusions on the decisions made by the Council.  

    Public access to meetings For the duration of the COVID-19 restrictions, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be held online as audio meetings using Microsoft Teams. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by surfing to the OTC web page, www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, clicking on the ‘Meetings’ tab, then scrolling down to the announcement about the next meeting, where there’ll be one link to the agenda and another to join the meeting listen-only. If you would like to be identified in the Mercury report as the originator of any correspondence read out, please contact The Phone Box at editor@phoneboxmagazine.com. Public participation The first letter reported the dumping of a large pile of rubbish on the small island on the Goosey, noting that with recent flooding this had been a disaster for the environment. Olney Town Council (OTC) is already in contact with the owner’s solicitors, will be meeting with them this month and will keep the letter writer informed of progress. The second letter requested it be read out at the March meeting. But the writer would like to remain anonymous in the minutes and recorded meeting. [Some of Mercury’s notes here have been omitted by the Editor because of unsubstantiated personal views against former Councillors and their names being used; that we would not publish without the writers’ name being made available to ourselves]. It hit out at what say as “the public trial by social media of the Council which, in my view, has been relentless since August 2020. It appears to me that close friends of ex-Councillors associated with and supported by the Phone Box appear to have cornered the local media in trying to influence residents to their way of thinking without a full story.” And the “tireless onslaught which, rather ironically, constitutes bullying” It then went on to request that “the Council replies to the questions publicly on social media and in the local press, to give a more balanced coverage of events?” Jeremy Rawlings noted that the Council would be replying in due course. He explained that other letters had arrived at the Council, some of which would be addressed later in this meeting. Note: The Council’s reply to the above letter, posted Wednesday 3rd March, and other of its posts going back to at least Wednesday 3rd February are worth reading as they provide some background to recent changes at the Council. These may be found here, https://www.facebook.com/pg/OlneyTownCouncil/posts, which may be viewed with or without a Facebook account. Apologies and declarations No apologies for absence had been received, all Councillors being present. No declarations of interest were made. Public Art Louise Izod, Public Art Officer at Milton Keynes Council (MKC), gave a brief presentation on Public Art, and specifically how OTC could utilise its Section 106 monies for Public Art purposes. MKC has a broad definition of Public Art, examples including follies and landmarks, sculpture, and artists in residence. It “is about inviting the vision, creativity and skills of artists to engage people freely with place, in a well considered way”, she said. Some of the contributions from development are used to help fund Public Art. Looking at Olney, her investigations suggested approx. £27,000 was available to spend now, with potential for a further £233,000 in the near future if certain developments, notably that adjacent to Yardley Road and Aspreys, go ahead. She recommended OTC seek public involvement to produce a plan. Chris Tenant explained that OTC maintains a tracker of Section 106 monies, so he would be able to help tie down what was available. He calculated the total pot of Public Art money to be about £345,000, due to about six developments. Desmond Eley asked how long it would take from a potential Public Art project being identified to achieving funding for it – the question asked in the context of the Amazing Grace celebrations planned 2022-2023. Louise replied that timescales for individual projects were around one year to 18 months while, if a plan was put in place first, that would add an initial six to eight months. Andrea Vincent felt it may be worth starting some work immediately, in parallel with creating a plan and encouraging community involvement. MKC Councillor Code of Conduct This item was to review the MKC Councillor Code of Conduct and consider its adoption in place of the current OTC Code of Conduct. Jeremy Rawlings noted that MKC was yet to approve it, though planned to do so shortly, so proposed to defer this until next month. Peter Geary explained that, while OTC could theoretically adopt it now, if Councillors wanted to propose any amendments, they could be checked for legality prior to MKC debating adoption of the new Code next month. The Code should be ready for the new OTC elected in May to sign up to, he said. Amendments to OTC Standing Orders Jeremy Rawlings put forward two proposals: All elected chairmen of committees must have attended chair training within six months pre or post their appointment; all members of the Finance, Human Resources and Planning Committees must attend subject-specific training within six months of appointment and then at regular intervals afterwards. Chris Tenant asked that “regular intervals” be defined, Peter Geary replying yearly, with additional training when underlying changes to the subject matter demanded it. Joanne Eley noted that most of those chairing committees who’d joined in 2017 had attended Finance, Planning, Effective Councillor-ing and chair training. Although she’d chaired many bigger committees than these, she felt those who were minded to give of their best had already attended the training and kept well abreast of these issues. Councillors voted unanimously in favour of these amendments. Demand-Responsive Transport proposals Jennifer Wilson-Marklew, an MKC Cabinet member with areas of responsibility including public transport, had been invited to speak concerning significant up-coming changes to bus services. A new demand-responsive, all-electric transport service called MK Connect, a mix of shared taxi and bus, will be introduced Wednesday 31st March prior to the withdrawal of various subsidised services. The to-be-withdrawn services affecting Olney and its surrounds are no. 37, and the Olney – Lavendon stretch of no. 21. The new service may be used up to 11pm, seven days a week, where no fixed service exists or none is running at the time. The service will cost £3.50 during peak hours (7am – 9am, 4.30pm – 6.30pm), and £2.50 all other times. Concessions are available, it costing £1 for All in 1 MK cardholders for example, and Older Person’s and Disabled Person’s bus pass holders travelling free after 9.30am on weekdays and all day at weekends. The service will arrive within 30 minutes in urban areas, 45 minutes in rural locations, and pick-up and drop-off within 400 metres of locations requested. Once booked, users will be guaranteed a seat, and wheelchair-accessible vehicles will be available on request. Further information is available here, https://ridewithvia.com/mk-connect/, and the booking line is 01908 252526. The changes will be publicised, including posters in bus stops, leaflets posted to homes in affected areas and by Parish Councils including Olney’s. Rugby 7s tournament Olney Rugby Club has requested use of the Recreation Ground for the Rugby 7s tournament on Saturday 17th July. Permission was granted subject to the COVID restrictions in place at the time, and similar conditions to those imposed in 2018. Tenders to repaint the Olney Centre interior Just two quotations had been received, other companies declining to quote due to the size of the job. Of those two, one of which is local, only the first had quoted for all the work required, the second planning to do so in the next few days. The Council is keen to complete the decoration before the Centre reopens so, once the full second quote is received or seven days have passed, the Council will accept one, likely the cheaper. Town Clerk’s report This was a long item, containing much relevant to recent changes at the Council. Some information is skipped and other compressed for brevity. The request for the up-coming year’s precept has been submitted, and documents for the Annual Governance and Accountability Return (AGAR) are being prepared. Annual staff appraisals have been put-back to early in the new financial year, bar the Town Clerk’s already completed. One-to-ones continue. The Council will be testing technology to allow the annual Town Meeting, planned Friday 16th April, to be online. The Olney Centre heating works are completed bar some final making good. A bin in front of the Olney Centre was set alight, this being seen, the fire extinguished and the Police informed of the criminal damage. Work on external walls has been finished, as has that near the Church. All the Markets are taking place, the numbers of stalls being increased gradually in line with emerging COVID regulations. The Cemetery continues to function under COVID guidelines, this proving hard for the families involved. OTC has sought guidance from the institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management, which has proved helpful. Clerk’s report: Complaints about individual Councillors Two complaints had been looked at by Monitoring Officers, each concerning an individual Councillor and on separate matters. Both were dismissed as having no case to answer, the Monitoring Officer noting both Councillors acted correctly. The outcome statements will be published on OTC’s website. The first concerned Desmond Eley’s part in the discussion of the agenda item “To agree a tender for the emergency repair of three walls” in January’s full OTC meeting. Desmond noted: “I find it rather ironic that former Councillor Mr. Viney made an unjustified, petty complaint about my perfectly acceptable conduct, particularly as he did not always comply with the Code of Conduct during his time as a Councillor. He has wasted hundreds of pounds of public money, and I am very happy for the full decision to be published. For the record, the Milton Keynes independent person advised that I stepped in to provide professional advice so that the matter could be resolved. That decision seemed to be in the best interests of the Council and the residents of Olney.” Regarding the second, Jeremy Rawlings explained: “This was raised by Councillor Colin Rodden, against me, who accused me of bullying and harassment. The independent person found no evidence of this whatsoever and, in fact, dismissed the claim completely. The complaint was rejected and, again, the adjudication, the report will be published in full on the Olney website.” ... and Collin Rodden responded: “It was unfortunate, and I didn’t want to go through the Code of Conduct, but I did feel that unfortunately there was no further way for me to actually go, unfortunately. So I think that, hopefully, though the various opportunities we’ve got through the various Codes we’ve been talking about tonight, and that we’ve put forward to the next Council meeting, we can look at those to make sure that all Councillors are protected, and that we have respect for each other and ensure that we don’t have a war over emails, and that people talk to each other, and that there’s more respect between various Councillors within OTC.” Jeremy concluded by explaining that, for members of the public listening to proceedings and considering standing for Council, there is a complete set of rules and regulations, a Code of Conduct, and also the OTC Standing Orders, to which Councillors are bound by law. They are important, available on the OTC website, and those considering standing would do well to read them to ensure they are fully conversant with the way the Council operates. He also noted that there is a route for both public and Councillors to complain and raise issues about Councillors’ conduct, as exercised here. Clerk’s report: Complaints about the Council as a whole Andrea explained that other complaints, more general to the Council as a whole, had been received. In the past year, one former Councillor had sent over 25 emails, including a Subject Access Request and three Freedom of Information (FOI) Requests, as well as complaints registered with the MKC Standards Office. All of these had been found to have no foundation, she said, but had caused great cost to the public purse. The first complaint was received from a member of the public and (different) former Councillor: Since the beginning of February, the Council had received 10 emails, on the matter of the Clerk’s Statement and the publishing of a Report, from a former Councillor. The complaints, where evidence had been provided, have been responded to as below. No evidence of bullying of the former Councillor has been provided. However, this will be investigated because it is a complaint and must therefore go through the process. The Council’s response was as follows, verbatim bar some reformatting: "I was not the Clerk at the time but have spoken to the Mayor and others who were on the Council at the time to build up an understanding of what happened. Having read the independent report and in the absence of other evidence, the report is correct. The complaint by the former Clerk clearly came as a surprise to most of the Councillors at Olney Town Council, especially the content. Olney Town Council took the complaint seriously and commissioned a full independent investigation that interviewed numerous people on the Council including yourself. The main allegations by the then Clerk were found to be baseless, however a number of significant weaknesses in the way the Council operated, and governance were highlighted. The Council has worked hard to correct these in the intervening time. The Council received a FOI request for the report after it was announced that we were looking into all business over the past five years that, at the time, the Council had decided to keep confidential and not make publicly available. The Council took professional advice as to whether the report should be released. The advice was it should. When a report is released under FOI it is normal practice to make it publicly available, which OTC did. I am sorry that you are annoyed by the release of the report, the Council has a duty to follow the rules. The very reason for this complaint arising in the first place was that the rules had not being followed. OTC has followed these rules in this case." The second complaint was from a former member of staff: In brief, they were concerned that their personal information had not been handled properly. They felt that they had become aware that OTC had disclosed information from their personal record on its website and also published the same information on its Facebook account. The Council response was as follows, verbatim as above: “Thank you for your email and I understand your concerns. The Council received a Freedom of Information request for a copy of the report on 5th February 2021. This came from a member of the public. The report is a summary report to the HR Committee of Olney Town Council which met on 11th March 2019 and Full Council on 1st April 2019. This summary report was in the papers for both March/April meetings and the agenda/minutes of the meetings show that you provided the papers for that meetings and Clerked them. Further the Mayor sent you a grievance outcome letter summarising the report's recommendations. This came with an instruction to forward to your colleagues which they tell us you did not do and there were no copies of such correspondence on their files. The summary report is not on anyone's personal record. This is a quite different document to the Investigation Report which of course regardless of an FOI would need to remain confidential as it is in people's personal records. Advice was taken from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) who clearly stated that the document should be published under the FOI Act in full. It was at no time marked confidential by the authors. We enquired of the ICO about names of staff and Councillors. They advised that redaction was not necessary as public servants Councillors, and staff should expect publication of their names and activities in the public interest. They also advised that the report was not exempt information under The FOI Act part II, having looked at it closely, there was no option for us other than to publish following the FOI request. Having received that advice, the Council took the view that although not necessary we would redact the names of staff. I also wrote to all staff (past and present) by first class post as courtesy to let you all know the document was to be published. As you had not given permission to use your home address, so I contacted “your most recent employer” who agreed to forward a letter to you. That was sent to them in an envelope with a first-class stamp to forward to you, your envelope also had a first-class stamp attached. You clearly had sight of the Summary Report when preparing for the March/April 2019 meetings. All other staff involved in the process did have a copy as I ensured this was the case when I took up my post in July 2019. The Council should not have suppressed the summary report to the HR Committee document in the first place. I'm unclear why this path was taken. You are of course within you rights to contact the ICO.” Clerk’s report: Compliments The OTC office had been thanked for its assistance with the repairs for the Church wall, having negotiated with MKC to get the work done, and is now negotiating to see if further walls near the Church can be similarly attended to. Colin Rodden thanked Andrea for contacting MKC re cutting back vegetation along the pathway between Olney and Emberton. This was looking really good, he said. Human Resources Committee report Joanne Eley explained that the Deputy Town Clerk, Sarah Kennedy, has gained her Introduction to Local Council Administration (ILCA) qualification and is embarking on her Certificate in Local Council Administration (CiLCA). The Town Clerk, Andrea Vincent, is part way through gaining her CilCA. Both regularly attend other training courses to give them the skills to manage their roles. Joanne then said the following, reproduced verbatim: “As the current HR Chair, I take exception to the false allegation reported in the Phone Box, implying that HR documents may have been shredded by current staff or Councillors. This is untrue. The source of this serious allegation is not identified but is asserted to be an anonymised comment posted on the Olney Noticeboard. This is not reliable, and the statements are defamatory. I would like to invite anyone with any factual evidence that this has ever taken place to come forward to the Council, Milton Keynes Council or the Police as it would indeed be a criminal matter. I cannot speak for what has occurred prior to my being elected HR Chair in September ’19, or prior to the appointment of the current Town Clerk in July ’19. There are certainly gaps in our documentation dating from before the respective appointments. The custom and practice employed prior to the dates stated above have been stopped. The former admin team issued confidential minutes on red paper, handed them out around after the exclusion of the press and public, and collected them back up after the end of the meeting. What happened to them after is a matter for the former incumbents. This was certainly not good practice, and lacked transparency. The report recently published highlights how this poor practice failed to stop a breach in confidentiality. Please everyone take note, this is untrue. The Council is duty bound to report fact, as a regulated and monitored organisation, that is accountable. We are working within the legislation and rules to correct the past failures that have been many years in the making. We have established good governance and transparency. Cronyism, which undermines democracy and is a moral hazard, no longer exists. At no time in the history of Olney Town Council has there been more transparency around Council working. For the record, I reiterate that this is my March 2021 report. No HR report was received by Council in February 2021. Given the editorial in this month’s Phone Box stressing how factual they are, and I quote ‘Mercury report, written by our independent reporters, that are a factual account of what has gone on’, I will therefore be writing to the Editor, asking him to explain why the report is not a factual contemporaneous report in this issue. See page 9 – this HR report was published in the January 2021 issue as a report delivered in December 2020. Whilst on the subject of the January issue, I take this opportunity to report to both Council colleagues and the residents, that the former Councillor who requested the FOI referred to has not exercised their right of appeal on the ICO ruling. Finally, on behalf of the staff team and the HR team, I thank all those residents who have taken the time to call, personal message and email in their support throughout the wake of the protracted media attack. In particular, those who stepped away from their family celebrations to convey to us how shocked and angry they were at the New Year’s Eve meddlesome ridiculing of the Town Clerk and Council.” Jeremy Rawlings thanked Joanne and the members of the HR Committee for the meticulous way they have worked since 2019 in order to bring the situation back to normality. Finance Committee report Paul Collins gave this report, part-reproduced verbatim: “I would like to correct a couple of statements in the latest issue of the Phone Box in Mercury’s report of the last Town Council meeting, in reference to the Community Support Fund. We have there allocated £5,000 per annum over three years to support the Amazing Grace 250 celebrations, which we hope will take place in 2022 – 2023. The report says I said that ‘£5,000 per annum for the next three years has been granted to the Museum for the Amazing Grace 250 celebrations.’ That is not correct. That money has not been allocated to the Museum. That is a fund specifically designed for the purpose of encouraging small community groups to come forward and suggest a variety of small-scale celebrations. The Museum itself is engaged in a project where we anticipate applying to external funders for approximately £350k, which is a project, I’m sure you’ll agree, in a different league to the one being referred to in the report. There is another point I’d like to raise in relation to the Phone Box, and this relates to a comment by a columnist, part of whose column is headed up ‘Council matters’, wherein it is stated that the mistakes made in the last AGR are in black and white and can be rectified by correct accounting next year. That is a totally false statement. There has been no challenge to the accounts submitted in terms of the actual numbers stated in our annual governance report, which has been signed off by both our internal auditor and our external auditor. The comments made by the external auditor were not a challenge to the actual numbers in our accounts, but they concerned procedural matters which have already been referred to by the Town Clerk. I can only surmise that the purpose of this was to smear myself personally and potentially other members of the Finance Committee. I wholeheartedly reject that. I think it’s a disgraceful way to conduct journalism.” Jeremy Rawlings reiterated that it was a procedural matter – some of the documents required were not submitted. As soon as the issue was raised, they were submitted and everything was fine. There was no issue with the content of any of the accounts or documentation sent to the auditors. Everything had now been approved. Joanne Eley added that the Mercury report is always unattributed to the actual author, month on month. She would be writing to the Phone Box, to ask that the public can see the name of each article’s author, it not being accountable otherwise. Jeremy explained that, over the years, there had been inaccuracies, and noted that there were times in the past when the Mercury reporter would speak with Councillors to verify accuracy but he did not believe this had happened, or at not with him, for well over two years. Recreations and Services Committee report Desmond Eley explained that the Town and Deputy Town Clerk have completed specific cemetery training, and are getting the records in line with current legislation. The grounds staff continued with all maintenance on open spaces, as they have throughout the pandemic, with the exception of the watering of hanging baskets. This included grass cutting, performed throughout the winter due to the lengthened grass-growing season. The introduction of management controls by the office and head grounds man had achieved a 57% decrease in diesel purchases, saving 3,200 litres for the year. These controls included fitting a padlock to the tank after the stock took a major hit mid May 2020. Further management control has led to a significant reduction in bedding plant expenditure, hoped to be reduced further this year while maintaining the existing displays. The soil of the sports pitches has been tested, the soil scientists recommending no more general fertiliser be applied for at least another five years. A rogue fertiliser order received in September 2019 was taken back by the suppliers’ agent without charge, and no purchases have since been made. Some nitrogen may need to be applied in Spring to parts of the pitches only. This evidence-based management of the Recreation Grounds is saving around £3,000 per year, and is also in line with the Council’s Environment Management Plan. An audit of machinery has been performed. It was established that two pieces of equipment were being held outside the town and out of the Council’s direct control. They’ve since been relocated to the Council’s compound. Public toilets have been kept open throughout most of 2020 and remain open today. Feedback on this and the cleaning regime established has been very positive indeed. The failure of the old Victorian underground pipe-work in the Olney Centre has been remedied and future-proofed, and turned out to be the cause of the long-term dampness in the Pre School area. Planning Committee report Steve Clark reported a Planning Application related to the ‘Apple Store’, at the top of the lane down to the orchard in East Street. Members of the Planning Committee had been given an informal presentation by the family concerned and their developers regarding the potential development of a small part of the orchard site. This would require access from East Street, that currently existing being too narrow due to the presence of this property. He believed it had not been used for human habitation for many decades – perhaps 60 – 70 years. A Planning Application has been lodged with MKC to remove the property, due to its poor state of repair, thus facilitating access to any subsequent development on the orchard. The state of the building and difficulty securing it mean it will likely be taken down without further consultation. This was a legitimate process, and not part of any future Application for the orchard site, he said. Development Group report Chris Tenant first declared an interest, living near the Aspreys / Yardley Road development. There has been concern about surface water run-off from that site, though there has been no further incident, temporary measures having been put in place by the developers. The full drainage scheme is slated for completion by April. Construction traffic routing has now been tightened, it appearing some vehicles had not followed the procedures in place – that Yardley Road and Driftway must be used to access the A509. The application for construction traffic access off Aspreys has been withdrawn on the advice of MKC. However, the developers will be able build a tarmac road on-site, along the path of an existing farmer’s track to its North Eastern edge. This will not require planning permission and thus not receive the usual checks and balances: Concerns remained, therefore. OTC has asked MKC to review this decision. Also, there will be further closures of Yardley Road due to associated works by Thames Water, noted on the Council’s website. Significant planning reform consultations are underway, particularly one concerning permitted change of use from retail and commercial to residential. If adopted, Chris felt it would imply a parallel planning system, where owners of commercial or retail properties could in effect change their use to residential without a Planning Application. This is of concern to market towns up and down the country, he said, it representing a threat to town centres. Joanne Eley noted that the biggest threats to retail were the pandemic and its aftermath. If some retail businesses were threatened, surely housing was preferable to empty units. It was hard to predict how our High Streets would be after the fallout from COVID. The best solutions to this were to support local businesses and shop locally, generating a thriving town centre, she felt. Desmond Eley asked if the Council could do more to encourage local shopping as the situation develops, in its newsletter for example. Joanne felt the whole shopping landscape had changed countrywide, for example young professional couples shopping online and on their way back from work, rather than using Olney for their weekly shop. Steve Clark gave some background, noting that OTC has seen various Planning Applications over the years for moves between retail and residential, and has always viewed them with sympathy to the local traders. However, not requiring a Planning Application was a retrograde step, he felt. Steve also asked Chris whether he would write an article for the next issue of the Council newsletter, summarising the main points about the various developments taking place around the town, Chris replying in the affirmative. Library and Museum reports Colin Rodden noted that, while Olney library is currently closed due to COVID, a click-and-collect service is available. Books can be ordered from https://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/libraries and collected from Olney Library at times available via that page. Paul Collins noted that the Cowper and Newton Museum now has an online booking system and, albeit scaling up, an online shop. It is hoped that the shop and gardens will open mid April, and the Museum mid-to-late May, subject to the lifting of COVID restrictions. =-=-=-=xxxx=-=-=-= The next meeting will be held online on Monday 12th April, at 7.00pm. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.


    Mercury's reports for 24 May 2021

    Olney Council report for the new Council 24 May 2021
    First report of the meeting printed in the May edition of Phonebox Magazine
    unknown
    Public access to Meetings
    Change: Out with the Old - In with the New
    It’s out with the old and in with the new as local elections ring the changes for Olney Town Council. A new era has begun at Olney Town Council after an incredible 6th May local election night brought about wholesale changes to the committee’s set-up and personnel.  Only Peter Geary and Chris Tennant were left from the previous council, which had been reduced to just nine members before the elections, following accusations about councillors’ conduct, bullying tactics, and a raft of resignations.  Some old faces have returned to the council chambers, among them Deirdre Bethune and Colin Rodden, while a host of first-time councillors took their place at the council table on 24th May, for the first meeting since the poll – coincidentally, the Annual Meeting of the Council (see report on page 17 of this month's issue).
    It's the biggest voter turn-out in the town’s history – more than half of the electorate took part.
    Tom Johnston
    In the biggest voter turn-out in the town’s history – more than half of the electorate took part – Ben Brown became the youngest-ever member of OTC, which also welcomed some well-known faces from around the town, including theatre producer and Phonebox columnist David Pibworth, foster carer Naomi Brock and lecturer Ian Stokes. With 15 seats on the council up for grabs a new look set-up was to be expected but it was the dramatic way in which the residents of Olney voted with their feet and made such sweeping changes, that caused the biggest surprise. 
    “It’s not about what happened on election night, it’s about what has happened over many years,” said Peter Geary.  “New people are coming on to the council all the time so it’s not going to be that much different. If you look over the last few years, there have always been new people.”
    Ben Brown is looking ahead to helping the town return to a new normal, as lockdown measures are eased.
    “I think I’m most looking forward to helping the town get back to a bit more normality, post-Covid,” he said. “I’d like to see cancelled events return, a thriving High Street and a busy recreation ground. The Town Council doesn’t have the power to fix everything, but it can certainly be a force for good in many areas.”
    With six women on the council now, there is a greater male/female mix, something that is welcomed by newly elected Jane Varley.
    “Women make up more than 50 per cent of the population now so it’s good to see so many on the council,” she said. “I am looking forward to siting down and working with the new council, and I want to lead on biodiversity and sustainability.  “I want to take the town forward. People come out in their droves to volunteer for this town – there is so much community spirit out there and we should harness it and make use of it.”
    Full list of elected Olney Town Council councillors:  Trevor Aldred | Dee Bethune | Naomi Brock | Ben Brown | Philip Geach | Peter Geary | Debbie Hall | David Pibworth | Colin Rodden Dan Rowland | Ian Stokes | Christopher Tennant | Jane Varley Leanne Ward | Debbie Whitworth


    First Meeting of the New Olney Town Council (As in the June 2021 Issue)
    The winds of change were sweeping through the main hall of the Olney Centre for the first meeting of the new council and not just because of the increased ventilation necessary to meet Covid guidelines.  This first meeting was unusual in that there were only two members of the previous council successful in the recent election.  As his final act as outgoing Mayor, Jeremy Rawlings opened the meeting, congratulating the new members and inviting nominations for the new Mayor.  Chris TennantTrevor Aldred and Phil Geach were nominated and indicated their willingness to stand, and following a secret ballot, Phil Geach was declared the winner. Jeremy then handed over to Phil and left the meeting. Phil’s first job was to oversee the election of a new Deputy Mayor. Naomi BrockDan RowlandBen Brown, and Colin Rodden were proposed, and Naomi Brockwas successful in the ballot.  There were 27 items on the agenda, many being mandatory procedural items that could be approved with a minimum of discussion. Others were deferred to future meetings when the members would have had time to review and understand the supporting documents as they felt they could not commit to roles and positions without understanding the commitment required.  Several subcommittees exist, and members were invited to put themselves forward to serve on those, considering any conflicts of interest that may exist.  Full details of the committee members will be published in the full report in the July edition of The Phonebox. Finally, Phil noted that there was no AOB on the agenda, but Town Clerk Andrea Vincent explained that this was not permitted under local government rules and only agenda items may be discussed. Phil suggested that when the Standing Orders are reviewed consideration is given to making this possible. The next meeting will be held on June 7th, once again with limited public access but the technical issues which plagued the online sound quality at this month’s meeting have been identified and will be resolved.
    MAY MEETING: NEXT MEETING 7 JUNE
    At the start of the meeting, one Letter was read out for the new Council's perusal
    DATE 13th May 2021 As a resident on Olney of 26 years, I wish to challenge the council on a number of matters in relation to the recreation ground off East Street (The Rec). It should be applauded that notice is being taken of the concerns of the various sports clubs which use the rec, namely doing whatever is possible to reduce or remove the incidence of dog faeces on the pitches, asking other users to move around the perimeter of sports pitched when in use, and so on. However, in doing so, the council is now operating to the detriment of the silent majority of individual and family users of the area, as they do not speak with one voice, and I thing the balance needs to be redressed. Therefore can the council please, with immediate effect, arrange the following;-

    1. Remove the temporary Heras fence panels between the childrens’ play area and the MUGA. This serves no useful purpose and merely serves to cause more people to walk across pitches, not less. Who thought that one through, it is simply a great inconvenience? Is it even legal to do this? During the height of lockdown the alternative narrow path to the left became effectively unuseable as it was not possible to pass at less than 2m distant from others. And in the rain earlier this year the narrow was an unmaintained mudbath. Either scenario not very user friendly.
    2. Remove, level or surface the two paths that now have a loose and rough covering of tarmacadam road planings applied. Is it applied, or simply chucked? This is a serious hazard to many users, namely people with pushchairs, wheelchair users, those with any form of walking support, and the paws of dogs walked there. At present this surface is a disgrace, and it will only be a matter of time before somebody injures themselves and registers a claim against the council.
    3. Either arrange for additional parking for sports use, or cut down on the number of pitches on the rec. On most Saturdays and Sundays, when Olney are “at home”, the whole area is a sea of cars and those that park are very inconsiderate. The “No sports Parking” signs in the area are a very poor attempt at a solution. Persuading those that live in Olney to walk rather than drive might also assist, but I doubt that many will listen.
    4. In allowing the various sports clubs to mark out their pitches, please ensure that they allow a greater margin around the sides. If you want to ensure that dog walkers and others do not traipse across pitches, you need to allow enough room for them to do so.
    5. And finally, and this is an issue I have directly raised to officials at times, screen off the main football pitch situated directly on East Street. This is extremely close to the childrens’ playground, and the foul language that can be heard loudly and clearly from inconsiderate players is sometimes appalling. The officials questioned seemed to have no power to tell the players to grow up and mind their language.
    In the meantime I have decided not to take my granddaughter to the playground on match days. Name and Address supplied
    Public access to meetings
    For the duration of the COVID-19 restrictions, meetings of Olney Town Council (OTC) will be restricted to however many rooms may be available in the Olney centre, the public can also go online to listen to the live audio meetings. Members of the public can listen to the proceedings by surfing to the OTC web page, www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, clicking on the ‘Meetings’ tab and scrolling down to the announcement about the next meeting, where there’ll be one link to the agenda and another to join the meeting listen-only. If you would like to be identified in the Mercury report as the originator of any correspondence read out, please contact Phonebox Magazine at editor@phoneboxmagazine.com.
    Next Meeting The next meeting will be held online on Monday 7 June, at 7.30pm. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Olney Council report for June 2021
    Second Meeting of the New Council
    This was the second meeting of the new Olney Town Council (OTC) since the last Mercury report. A summary of the first, the Annual meeting, was published in the May edition of The Phonebox but anyone wishing to know about the proceedings in more detail can read the official minutes on the OTC website or listen to a recording on The Phonebox website:
    Public access to meetings
    Only one member was present to speak.  John Bates asked about progress of the Neighbourhood Plan (NP). The plan set a limit of 300 new houses up to 2031 but that had already been exceeded, he said. The plan’s stated objectives include additional parking, accessibility, pedestrian, and cycle routes; to reduce traffic problems; to use developer contributed funds to improve community facilities and infrastructure. Even before the 250-house Yardley Manor site begins, Olney is suffering from these problems, he said, and called upon the council to resist any further expansion to Olney.  Mayor Phil Geach said the council would formally respond in writing. Another resident had written regarding the lack of recordings of past meetings on the OTC website, as happens with Milton Keynes Council (MKC). He had asked for his name to be read out, but Phil declined to do so, not because of the non-disclosure policy of the previous council but because the correspondent had said he was on holiday and unable to attend in person. At the start of the formal part of the meeting Mayor Phil Geach called a minute’s silence for the victim of the recent tragedy at the river in Olney. Phil reported that there had been an error in the counting of votes for the position of Deputy Mayor at the last meeting where Naomi Brock had been elected. Naomi had actually been one vote short of an absolute majority, but the other candidates had subsequently agreed not to ask for a re-run and said they fully supported her in the role. A vote was taken to reconfirm Naomi as Deputy Mayor which was passed unanimously. Colin Rodden pointed out that he had not received an apology from the office, as had been promised.
    Citizens Advice Service
    At the April meeting a proposal from MK Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) stating how they propose to provide service in the post-Covid environment had been discussed. The proposal was for a weekly combined face to face service and phone/online service at a cost to OTC of £5,850 per year, whereas the pre-Covid service had been fortnightly and considerable discussion had taken place at that meeting regarding the need for face to face consultations in the digital era. Ian Stokes asked how well the service had previously been used and Andrea said that all five appointments were always booked within two days of being opened up. There was some discussion as to how those without the technology could access the online facility, since there seemed to be an implication that OTC would somehow provide the capability. Using the PC in the library would not be particularly private, thought Deirdre Bethune. The preference appeared to be for a fortnightly service so it was agreed that Phil would speak to the CAB and come back with a proposal at the next meeting.
    Watering of High Street hanging baskets
    Deirdre Bethune explained that the hanging baskets in the High Street are put up by volunteers from Olney Events, having originally been done by the Floral Fiesta Committee and then The Olney Group (TOG). When Olney used to enter the Britain in Bloom competition we gained additional points for community involvement, she said. The baskets have always been watered by the council ground staff , along with the council-owned baskets around the Market Place, but there had never been a formal written agreement for them to do so. Colin Rodden asked how much time was spent on the watering and Andrea replied that it took two hours, two or three times a week, depending on the weather. A vote was taken to formalise the arrangement which was passed unanimously.
    Recreations and Services committee
    Ian Stokes presented a proposal to split the existing committee into two new and separate committees, due to the diverse nature of the areas of responsibility. The fi rst would cover environment and community services, to include environmental impact and climate emergency, and the second would cover sports and recreation. Since writing the proposal he had realised that Olney’s heritage was a big part of the town and should also be considered. Many of the new members had indicated they wished to serve on the Recs and Services committee, so perhaps there was an opportunity to split it, he suggested. Deirdre Bethune said that in the past there had been two separate committees but there had been such a high degree of cross-over that they had been combined. This would become clearer once the committee had met for the fi rst time, she thought. Peter Geary agreed, saying that 75-80% of the committee’s work involved parks and recreation and managing the fl eet of machinery. The council was keen to be ‘lean,’ he said, and putting in another committee with the associated overheads could be seen as creating unnecessary bureaucracy. He suggested sticking with the existing arrangement for six months and then review. David Pibworth asked if the Kitchener Centre came under the remit of Recs and Services, since it is used by the people of Olney who OTC represent and there was a great deal of concern in the town regarding its future. Andrea replied that it is managed by MKC so OTC is not directly responsible, but Phil said any issues and concerns can be raised to MKC via the Parish Liaison Group. It was agreed that Ian would look at how matters such as School’s liaison and environmental issues could be dealt with and to revisit in six months’ time.
    Surgery for councillors
    Phil explained that his prime reason for becoming a councillor was to listen to residents, and other new members also wished to increase engagement with the community. They felt the best way to do that was with face to face meetings and he’d approached the clerk with a proposal to use a room in the Olney Centre for a regular surgery. The Clerk had initially said that he should personally pay for use of the facilities, with which he had disagreed. After some discussion he proposed a motion that, subject to certain conditions, members of the council should be permitted to use the Olney Centre for surgeries without charge which was passed.
    Engagement of a Quantity Surveyor
    At the April meeting a discussion had taken place about the soaring costs of the proposed community centre on the Aspreys development and the duty of care that OTC has to get value for money. It had been agreed to engage a Quantity Surveyor to produce a report. This had now been received but unfortunately the report was marked as In Confi dence and not to be circulated outside of the council, so after much discussion it was agreed to move the matter to the confi dential items part of the meeting when press and public would be excluded. Peter Geary agreed, saying that because the document was marked In Confi dence the council had no choice, but the results of those discussion should be made public at the earliest opportunity. In general, there must be compelling reasons for members to vote to discuss an item in closed session. Phil Geach agreed, saying that in future the clerk would be required to provide an explanation as to why an item should be confi dential when the agenda was published in advance of the meeting so that members can make an informed decision. This led to further discussion about exclusion of press and public in general, and Colin Rodden said there were a number of complex items with which the new members would need to be brought rapidly up to speed. Chris Tennant, as Chair of the Development Group, expressed his disappointment that the document marking meant that the item could not be discussed in open forum because he had come prepared to give the council and members of the public a full update on the NP and in particular the Yardley Manor site. Phil Geach proposed that the item was moved to Confidential Items, which was agreed by a majority with two abstentions. However, when the vote was taken at the end of the open meeting for the public and press to be excluded, the majority of members chose to abstain from the vote, which was still passed by the majority of those who voted.
    Club House at the Recreation Ground
    Later in the meeting there was an agenda item to discuss the club house on the recreation ground formally owned by Olney Town Football club which Andrea Vincent proposed should be discussed in closed session. Andrea explained that she wished to provide a full and open history which would include commercially and privately sensitive information. David Pibworth said he was not happy with the proposal but would reluctantly accept it if the information was subsequently made public. Peter Geary said members should be clear that if they were not convinced that an item should be discussed in closed session then they should vote against it, but they should understand the legal ramifications. Naomi Brock questioned whether the subject was confidential since a great deal of information was already in the public domain. David asked for clarification of the legalities and Andrea replied that she would be in breach of GDPR by mentioning personal and commercial information about people. Phil asked if it would be possible to discuss the matter without identifying those individuals and Andrea replied that she did not think so. Further discussion took place and eventually Peter Geary proposed that Andrea should compile a detailed, confidential briefing to be circulated at least 10 days before the next meeting where a vote would be taken as to whether it should be discussed in closed session which was passed.
    Sale of land in Dinglederry
    For info: This does not refer to ‘the mound’ of which there has been much discussion on social media. Two residents of Dinglederry have approached the council with a view to purchasing separate strips of land adjacent to their properties. The fi rst is a gated alleyway which leads nowhere. The previous council had asked for a land agent valuation to be obtained, but Andrea Vincent said none of those approached had responded. Peter Geary explained that it was originally intended to be part of a public footpath which never came into being and was of no amenity value whatsoever and the price being off ered was reasonable. He proposed that the council agreed to sell the land and the vote was taken and passed. The second is a small triangle of land containing a dog bin and lamppost. There is a gated entrance to the resident’s rear garden across the land which the resident indicated may be required for a mobility scooter in the future. Andrea Vincent said the dog bin could be easily moved but not the lamppost. Deirdre Bethune said she had been to check and believed there was already room for mobility scooter access. Peter Geary said he was not convinced about the request and suggested that the mayor and others visit the site and discuss with the resident, which was agreed.
    Annual Governance and Accountability Return (AGAR)
    Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy explained that this document would need to be signed off by the Clerk and Mayor at this meeting. A few members said they hadn’t received the document, so it was agreed to have a brief adjournment at the end of the meeting to allow them to read it. It was subsequently signed off .
    Clerk’s report
    In response to Andrea Vincent’s report that the public toilets remain open, Leanne Ward said she had received feedback that the toilets Mercury Repored on the recreation ground need to be open for longer as they currently close at lunch time. Andrea said that following vandalism last year the decision had been made to close early, but the council was looking to keep them open until 3:00 or 4:00pm. Leanne said that when she had been responsible for maintaining the toilets the vandalism had occurred later and that she thought 6:00pm was more reasonable. Jane Varley said that when she had been at the Rec litter picking, she had noticed that people were still using the bushes because the toilets were closed at 1:00pm. Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy said a deep clean takes place at 5:30pm after which they could be closed, which Leanne thought was reasonable but 6:00pm would be preferable for weekends. It was agreed to discuss with the cleaners and to investigate the provision of signs stating the opening and closing times. An advert for the Olney Centre caretaker role had been prepared and would be advertised when bookings start to return. Phil Geach noted that it was a zero hours contract, which he said he was opposed to. He proposed a motion that the council is opposed to zero hours contracts, which was passed by a majority with one abstention. There is one standards complaint being investigated by the MK Monitoring Officer about a previous councillor.
    Odds and Sods
    New members said they had no idea what the individual items on the finance report referred to so it was agreed that the Clerk would provide an additional breakdown in the future. It was agreed that all councillors would be enrolled as a group to the National Association of Councils at a cost of £16 per head. At the previous meeting Town Clerk Andrea Vincent had advised members that David Pibworth was not eligible to join the working group on Press and Media Communications as he writes a regular column for The Phonebox. Phil Geach said he and David had subsequently sought advice and been informed that this is not the case, so would respectfully be declining the Clerk’s advice and David would be joining the working group.
    Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th July. Members of the Public are welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the Mayor decides is appropriate.
    Olney Council report for July 2021
    Public access to meetings 
    With the planned lifting of COVID-19 restrictions due on 19th July, this was expected to be the last full Olney Town Council (OTC) meeting to be held, socially distanced, in the large room at the Olney Centre. 
    Public participation
    Two letters were read out in this section. The fi rst, from Zina Bage, concerned the number and speed of HGVs passing through Olney, then moved on to traffic and parking, in particular considering the new housing being built. Mayor Philip Geach explained that OTC was inviting the Head of Highways at Milton Keynes Council (MKC) to visit in the coming months, and would put these points to her. The second letter concerned parking in Oakdown Crescent, the issues cited refl ecting the long term paucity of parking in the surrounding area.
    Process review
    Trevor Aldred offered to conduct a process review, in order to improve business practice and efficiency, and measure performance so that the Council can tell whether or not it is improving. Councillors voted to take him up on this offer once the new Town Clerk was in post, Andrea Vincent having resigned recently after around two years’ service.
    Community building at Aspreys
    Chris Tennant explained that the Quantity Surveyor’s report had been forwarded to the Developers, and would be discussed in a meeting later in the week between them and representatives from OTC, to talk through the options and a revised proposal for the building.
    Town Clerk’s report
    With Andrea not being at this meeting, this was handled by Sarah Kennedy, Deputy Town Clerk. Phil Geach reported that the Town’s retailers had written a note to express their gratitude for the retail initiative and the work Andrea had put into it. He thanked Andrea for her service to OTC and wished her well in her new role at Wolverton. Naomi Brock had received much feedback from local residents about poor landscaping, including grass not being cut. Deirdre Bethune noted that OTC generally takes on an extra grounds person to assist during the Summer. Also, heavy rainfall had at times promoted stronger than usual grass growth. Sarah Kennedy suggested publishing a schedule of work, so residents could see when each area of grass was due to be cut. Peter Geary noted that these issues were not unique to Olney – pretty much every public authority which cuts grass is currently having such problems.
    Change of area for Community Orchard
    Jane Varley noted that the previous Council had approved the creation of a Community Orchard, sited adjacent to the allotments. This item was to review a recommendation from a tree expert to rotate it by 90 degrees, sited instead adjacent to the southern end of the fi eld, where it is likely to thrive better, the remainder of the fi eld being used as a wild fl ower meadow. It would also make it easier to extend the allotments if required. Councillors voted to accept this recommendation.
    Community Fete
    Dan Rowland requested approval for the Council to investigate holding a Community Fete on the Recreation Ground. It would be a fun event to bring the town together, particularly given COVID and the cancellation of both Riverfest and the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF). Starting with 28th August, various dates and locations were discussed, attempting to avoid clashes of time and location. It was noted that there was a relatively short time remaining until what would be a Summer event. Councillors voted to approve the principle of a Community Fete, with the fi nal date and decision delegated to the Mayor and the Offi ce.
    Committees
    Chris Tennant reported that the Development Group will be reworking the Neighbourhood Plan. This will be followed by public consultation before adoption by the end of 2022. The latest works on Yardley Road are complete, the drainage and sewage connections having been put in place by the Developer. Works towards the end of July will see the installation of a pelican crossing on Aspreys, with further works next Summer yielding additional safety improvements. Colin Rodden reported that the Human Resources Committee was recruiting for two temporary posts to support Sarah in the offi ce until a new Town Clerk could be appointed. Trevor Aldred reported that the Planning Committee had attended a meeting with the developers of the Warrington Road site, and looked through around 20 planning applications.
    Dog bins
    Naomi Brock has been looking into the possibility of off ering sponsorship of the dog bins, aiming to cover the approx. £2.50 per week cost to empty each bin, and £500 cost to buy each new one when required. Councillors voted to approve the idea in principle.
    Working groups
    Naomi reported that the Public Toilet opening hours have been extended, now open from 7.30am – 5.30pm Monday to Friday, and 9.30am – 5.30pm at weekends. The Council is considering siting a new bin south of the tree-line behind the existing one near the Swimming Steps. Bin bag dispensers at the Recreation Ground are also being considered, recognised as not being without risk. Graffi ti was also discussed, as was parking (currently a very serious issue) and CCTV. In addition, a community litter picking group was being looked at, to act as somewhat of a visual deterrent, as well as to collect litter. Diff erent ways to maintain, and perhaps adopt, play areas were also noted. Finally, the Police can now use the facilities in the Olney Town Colts Clubhouse 24-7. It’s hoped this will encourage more of a presence in Olney and the Recreation Ground.
    Exclusion of Public and Press
    Towards the end of many Council meetings, Councillors vote on whether Public and Press should be excluded so that confi dential items may be discussed. Usually, this is the prelude to the end of the Mercury report but, this time, it was used merely as a technical mechanism so that the document on which the forthcoming discussion would be based could be received, any confi dential parts redacted, and then the ensuing discussion conducted in public.
    Club House at Recreation Ground
    This item concerns the southern end of the Club House adjacent to the football pitch on the Recreation Ground adjacent to East Street, previously occupied by Olney Town Football Club and currently occupied by Caveman Conditioning. The northern end of that building is occupied by the Olney Town Colts Football Club, and is not part of this discussion. It was clear from the start that, while the previous Council had discussed this topic as a confi dential item, this one was determined to discuss it in public, with only the minimum required pieces of information redacted. Phil Geach explained that the redacted parts of the document noted above were the “terms of tenders, and proposals and counter-proposals in negotiations and contracts”. Also, names and organisations could not be mentioned and, as they were not spoken, they are not reported further. Jane Varley was keen to draw a line under the previous Council’s handling of the situation, and get on with resolving it. Deirdre noted that she’d spoken with the person concerned, and they still had a strong interest in staying in the building. Chris Tennant summarised the current situation: The southern end of the building had fallen into disrepair due to decades of neglect, meaning signifi cant structural defects must be remedied, probably a complete rewire, roof repairs, plumbing work and a lot of TLC. The Council went through a tendering exercise, with expressions of interest being sought from various groups, in and outside the town,  to become preferred bidders for taking a long lease on that end of the building. That lease was to be on the basis that the leaseholder would take responsibility, and fund the costs of repairing the building and fi tting it out as needed. A preferred bidder was selected and a contract of the lease issued, but the costs to repair the building spiralled and the preferred bidder was unable to complete the contract for the lease. So, there is no preferred bidder in place, but the organisation involved remains keen to take the building on. The building has fallen back to OTC as an asset, and needs significant investment to make it suitable for use. The issue to be resolved is what OTC should do with this asset. Ian Stokes noted that it was a former community building, and that the process adopted by the previous Council was disgraceful, secret, private and deceitful – he had papers to prove it, which he was happy to publish. There are other interested parties who wish to take on the building, and always have been – but they were dismissed. He also felt that the rental fi gures he’d seen were farcical (i.e. too low) for a commercial rent – other businesses would be very keen to have such preferential rent for this building – perhaps six to a dozen. This building could be a way to raise funds to maintain the Recreation Ground during the Summer, he felt – security, litter picking, etc. If it was to be rented to a business, a commercial rent must be charged. Peter Geary felt the mistake by the Council dated back four to fi ve years, when it took on the building in the state it was in, rather than enforcing the terms of the lease to ensure the building was handed back in ‘a cleared condition’. It is not an asset, it’s a liability, for which the Council is responsible. There now appeared to be two options for the Council: pay for the repairs, or lease it to an organisation which would fund them. Leanne Ward felt that it was a community building, taken away from the community and run by a commercial enterprise which hadn’t put anything back into it. A commercial building should attract a commercial rent. This was the reason for the hostility from the Rugby Club, the Football Club, etc. It was only fair to make it available to all interested parties, giving them a chance to lease it. Naomi Brock felt that perhaps a few different organisations could use it. Dierdre Bethune noted that the original OTC-commissioned Quantity Surveyor’s report, which identifi ed a cost-to-fi x very much lower than that believed now, led the plan to be that the existing tenant would make all the repairs in one go. However, the much-increased costs had led to them instead wanting to make them scheduled over time. Phil Geach felt the majority were minded to almost start from scratch, in an open and transparent way, not excluding any interested party. An inspection will be performed to see if the building is safe and, if it isn’t, the cost to make it safe will be estimated.
    Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 2nd August, at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk.
    unknown
    Olney Town Council Meeting 2/8/21
    This is a general summary / highlights of the meeting and is not the minutes
    Public speaks Sue Warren referred to item 7 on the agenda regarding Oakdown Crescent and its parking problems. She has been asking for the council to look at this problem for 10 years. So far, the only progress has been for an ambulance bay to be marked out. Later on in the meeting it was brought up as a topic that should be discussed by the parking working group. Linda Baker letter referred to the problem of enough capacity for badminton players and requested that any new facilities built in Olney ie. The Aspreys development would have suffi cient height for those who wish to play badminton. Bev Wright spoke at the meeting had originally wanted to speak at the meeting on another matter. Beverley Wright was commenting on the fact that she believed that the public should be able to speak at the beginning of the council meeting on any topic whether on the minutes or not otherwise the topic a member of the public may want to talk about may never come on the agenda. According to the Mayor The standing orders say differently but in this instance he would allow her to talk on any subject.  Mayors update A user group has been set up by Naomi Brock re litter picking that is working well. More bins have been placed at the rec which is helping. There is still graffiti, drinking at the play park most nights despite being reported to the police. CCTV and security regarding the rec There was a lively debate on whether OTC should employ security staff at the rec on busy weekends. Naomi Brock would prefer a long-term solution for Olney of a warden. Leanne Ward thought security staff would only push the problem elsewhere. There was a general feeling that something should be done for this summer at least and it was agreed to ask for quotes from different security firms as a more immediate remedy. CCTV was also discussed but was agreed that it doesn’t actually stop problems at the rec. Football Club Quotes were considered re a safety inspection of the Football Club building that is in a parlous state. It was agreed that a building inspection was called for followed by an electrical report. Working group for areas of concern in the town. A working group was set up to look at parking issues in the town. Removal of publication of personal matters relating to a former employee The item has now been taken down and it was agreed that personal matters should never be publicised in the first place. It was agreed that the former employee would receive an apology. Update on the Community Building at Aspreys. Chris Tennant is spearheading this project. It has been decided that the base design should be such that it can be enhanced in the future as further monies become available.  Update re the Goosey Island land. The owner of this land has offered it for sale at the price of £125k Councillors thought this valuation was way above its true value. There was some interest in crowd funding as an option but ultimately the whole idea was rejected. Some figures were discussed as to what the value might be should it ever be considered as a purchase. To review the expenditure report Council were informed that IT is now fully wired for WiFi. The Deputy Towns Clerks Report Received and noted. To approve drafts of the amended OCM, Finance and Dickens of a Christmas Terms of Reference now that the committee meetings have taken place. Terms of reference agreed.
    Olney Council report for September 2021
    Public access to meetings
    Mayor Phil Geach explained that at last month’s meeting a resident wanted to speak on a matter that was not an agenda item for that meeting. The Standing Orders approved by the previous council did not permit this, although they chose to ignore this rule. He had suspended that Standing Order on that occasion and explained that the council were currently consulting with Bucks Association of Local Councils (BALC) as to whether the Standing Orders could be amended to permit discussion on any subject in the future. In the meantime that rule would be suspended at this and all future meetings until a decision had been made. This was an agenda item later in the meeting where, after much discussion as to when and why this rule had been made in the first place, it was agreed to amend the Standing Orders at the next appropriate meeting, subject to advice from BALC.
    Public participation
    The only person wishing to speak was Lee Hindle regarding what she described as the ‘tatty and shambolic’ state of the town. In the past a temporary groundsman had been employed by the council for the summer months, but this had not happened this year. A previous groundsman had returned on a voluntary basis – mainly in the cemetery and churchyard, she said, in order that the other ground staff could get on top of the mammoth task of maintaining the rest of the town, and things did improve greatly. She commended Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy for her efforts and visibility but suggested that the ground staff need to ‘pull their fingers out’ to get the town back to looking as it had done in the past.
    Olney Health Hub
    As Chair of the Olney Development Group, Chris Tennant provided an update on the proposals to relocate the existing Cobbs Garden Doctors Surgery (CGDS) to vacant land adjacent to the Olney Youth Centre off Austen Avenue, as identified in the Neighbourhood Plan. CGDS has also considered the Warrington Road site on the edge of the town owned by a developer that has outline planning permission for a range of use. Also present from CGDS were Chris Herman (Advisor), Dr Maggie Winter and Practice Manager Penny Giraudeau. Presenting his report, Chris Tennant explained that the current medical centre opened in 1992 to serve 6,000 patients. It now has 8,500 which will grow to 9,500 with the new houses being built. The practice would ideally like to reopen its list to surrounding villages where they have historically taken patients, and this could see their list grow to 12,000. Demand for appointments is high, one factor being the larger than average number of elderly patients. The current surgery does not meet current regulations in terms of building design, space, disability access, car parking and other areas. Primary care has changed over the last 30 years with increased medical care being provided in the community and this is likely to increase in the future, putting additional strain on the existing building. Not only does the practice need to increase the amount of clinical space but also the administrative area available to their staff. An independent review two years ago concluded that the current building is severely restrained and would need to double in size to meet current building standards, which would not be possible on the current site. They would like to incorporate a modern IT service and develop the role of telemedicine. There has been interest from a dentist and optician to provide a One Stop Health facility. The Youth Centre and adjacent land is currently owned by Milton Keynes Council. (For Info: MKC ceased funding Youth Services some years ago and since then the building has been in a steady state of decline. It was recently leased to a team of local volunteers who have undertaken some renovation work and opened it as the East Street Community Centre). There is a significant amount of Section 106 money (‘Planning Gain’ from the new housing developments) to support the project, circa £719k. If the partners were to own the new surgery the balance would be funded via ‘borrowing cost reimbursement’ or notional rent. The other option would be for a commercial developer to build and fund the development, again using the Section 106 money available. In October 2020 some Section106 money was secured from MKC by CGDS, with the help of OTC, for the practice to appoint a professional advisor to look at a project feasibility study. The brief included site search/investigation, viability appraisal, NHS funding, heads of terms, and preparation of an outline business case and funding requirement from the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) in order to progress to the next stage. The advisor was appointed in October 2020 and has been working with CGDS on project feasibility and negotiation with MKC Property Services. Several meetings have been held between MKC and CGDS since December 2020 and initial designs for the Austen Avenue site prepared but the project seems to have stalled over issues such as how to fund and provide the replacement for the existing Youth Centre building. Discussions with Anglian Water over the sewer that runs below the site have been positive and with a 6m easement it is possible to locate the proposed Health Hub building and replacement Youth Centre on the site. Considerable discussion then took place. The preliminary plan shows a new entrance to the facility off Austen Avenue, roughly where the existing Youth Club building stands. Colin Rodden was concerned about the increase in traffic and was keen to get public engagement for the whole project as soon as possible. Practice Manager Penny Giraudeau said that the Patient Participation Group had recently been revitalised and were keen to be involved in any consultations. With regards to replacement of the Youth Club building, the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) had expressed a preference for building refurbishment rather than replacement where possible, Colin said. He asked about CCG funding and Chris Herman said it was not guaranteed that they would agree to provide funding. It was important to get a commitment from MKC to release the land, he said. Leanne Ward asked what additional services CGDS would be considering providing on the site, expressing a preference for those lacking in town, rather than services such as dentist and optician which are already existing. Dr Winter explained that CGDS currently has patients with the smallest square footage of anywhere in MK and they are ‘bursting at the seams’ and had been for some time. The new premises would enable them to look at expanding their range of services and list, but that would be dependent upon employing additional doctors.  A new building on the Warrington Road development was being considered, but she would prefer to remain in the centre of town for ease of access. The surgery would still focus on providing a good core service, she said. Ward Councillor Peter Geary noted that CGDS proposed to fund the building of the new Youth Centre and pointed out that OTC had recent experience in the cost of building such a facility. The cost of building the Community Centre on the new Yardley Road development had turned out to be much higher than anticipated and he thought that a funding gap existed in this case to provide a similar sized facility, even with an element of Section 106 funding. Although in need of considerable renovation, the existing building is fundamentally sound, he said, and could be renovated at less cost than a new building. However, this would not deliver the benefits of a new building in terms of aesthetics, energy efficiency or usability. Chris Tennant said there appeared to be considerable support from MKC for a new building as part of the overall scheme. A vote was taken and it was agreed to support CGDS with their relocation plan.
    Mayor’s report
    A data connection hub has been installed in the High Street by MKC and no one seems sure what it’s for. It is apparently for topping up bus data points cards but is not located at the bus stop. Phil Geach said it had been installed without consultation to OTC or the conservation officer. MKC has apologised and it will probably be moved to the bus stop. The MK Connect service has been of variable quality and communication from MKC has been poor. They have promised to give OTC a seat at the table for future discussions around the service. Phil said he had also enquired about the possibility of an electric shuttle bus around the town when the Yardley Road development is built. 
    OTC Community Fund
    This fund, previously known as the Sidney Dix fund, after a local benefactor, is available to community groups in the Town. Chair of Finance Ben Brown explained that the application process has a yearly cycle with applications being submitted to the council by May, discussed at the finance committee in July and then ratified by full council in September. For a number of years the number of grants awarded have been minimal and therefore the pot has grown to circa £35,000. The money in this reserve cannot be spent by the council and can only be used for the purpose of community grants. The finance committee are proposing that the community fund is advertised more widely and the deadline and timetable for grants be temporarily suspended to allow applications at any time. Leanne Ward asked if schools could apply to the fund and Ben said he was of the opinion that schools fell within the criteria of community groups. It was agreed to suspend the existing application process for 12 months and allow applications to be made throughout the year. A current application of £500 from the Cowper memorial United Reformed Church towards a community quilt project for the Amazing Grace 250 celebration was approved, as was a grant of £3000 to the Rugby Club towards their new changing rooms
    Olney Fireworks
    The Olney Group (TOG) has requested permission to hold the annual firework display on the recreation ground on Sunday 7th November, subject to whatever Covid regulations and advice may be in place at the time. The council agreed to the request.
    Club House at Recreation Ground
    This item concerns the southern end of the Club House adjacent to the football pitch on the Recreation Ground adjacent to East Street, previously occupied by Olney Town Football Club and currently occupied by Caveman Conditioning. Following on from the detailed discussion at last month’s meeting, Jane Varley reported that legal advice had been obtained regarding the existing tenant confirming that they have rights as a sitting tenant. However, no lease has ever been signed so OTC are within their rights to go to the tenant and seek a review of this non-existent lease and to set a lease at a commercial rate. A building survey has been completed and the results were due on 17th September. An electrical survey is also planned but that will now be delayed until the results of the initial survey are available. Should the building be deemed unsafe to occupy then OTC would have a duty of care to ensure that Caveman Conditioning vacate the building. There was considerable discussion around whether the council would be liable in the meantime, but Peter Geary observed that none of the other council owned properties had received a full building survey recently, so it was taken on trust that they were safe unless there was evidence to the contrary. It was agreed to wait for the result of the survey before taking any further action. 
    The next meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 4th October, at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk.
    The Mayor's Memo as in the September Magazine
    unknown
    This last week, three months after becoming Mayor, saw my first two official engagements; the opening ceremony of the new Cabin on the Community Allotment and an awards ceremony at Olney Fire Station.
    On the face of it you may not think that these two events have a lot in common but for me each, in their own way, symbolises the caring community in which we are so lucky to live. The first event was last Saturday when I had the honour to appear alongside Gladys Olujobi representing the Co-op. The store has supported so many community initiatives and we are truly grateful for their continued presence and engagement in day-to-day life in the town.  The Allotment Association, chaired by Elaine Herniman, has worked tirelessly to bring the joy of gardening, self-sufficiency and achievement to so many. The Community Allotment, with its raised beds, wide, well-tended paths, poly tunnel and now bright and spacious Community Cabin complete with solar power, is a haven for all who use it, bringing an opportunity to enjoy all that being an allotment holder can bring but on a smaller more manageable scale. The variety of fruits and vegetables being grown is an inspiration to us all and truly a pleasant way to spend a few hours. We are all too aware of the precarious balance that exists on our planet; the harmonious interaction of humans, and the ecosystem that supports us is vital to ensure our continued survival and it is beholden on us all not to lose sight of our duties as custodians, not owners, of the world we inhabit.  The Council is currently exploring a number of projects to help us better support our environment and subsequently make Olney a nicer place for all. We have recently given our support to a new meadow to the east of the allotments and, bordering the south side of that, a community orchard. With the future in mind we are exploring solar power for Council Buildings and the introduction of more charging points for electric vehicles, all of which we will be looking to provide by means of grant-aided funding and therefore at minimal impact on the finances of the Council. The Council is also working with Milton Keynes to take more open spaces into local ownership and thereby give us more opportunity to determine how best to support wildlife whilst keeping areas available for recreation. On Tuesday evening I hot-footed it from a Finance Meeting to the local fire station where I was treated to a demonstration of the expertise of our town firefighters during a series of drills. To say that these fellow residents of ours are dedicated to keeping us safe and train hard to ensure that they can, would be to vastly understate the level of their commitment to the town. Following the drill I presented a certificate of achievement to Firefighter Craig Price for attaining qualifications in firefighting proficiency requiring two years of training. Congratulations Craig!  A number of things were apparent to me during my visit. The level of camaraderie, professionalism and good humour displayed by the crew was evident and I was immensely reassured that some of our own cared enough to give of their time and offer up their personal safety for their neighbours. What did concern me was the simple lack of numbers of crew available. On Tuesday there were four firefighters in attendance out of a current establishment of six. To put this into perspective, in order to be able to offer a viable service to the town an establishment of 12 is needed. There have been a couple of incidents over the last year or so where comment has been made over the lack of attendance of the Olney fire engine. The simple fact is that there were not enough crew to man it. We need to acknowledge that if we wish to retain this invaluable facility in the town then we need more people to step up to join our current team. The requirements to join are not onerous; you need to be 18 years old or more and be physically fit. The Fire Service knows that not everyone can be available 24/7 so it is quite ok if you can only offer time during the day or after say 6pm as long as you can get to the station in East Street within 8 minutes of receiving a call.  I know from my work in the Covid Support Group that the community spirit in Olney is second to none so I implore all of you ladies and gentlemen who can offer up some of their time to contact Station Officer Des O’Connor at doconnor@bucksfire.gov.uk or simply pop along to the Station on a Tuesday evening for a chat. Likewise any businesses that would like to encourage their staff to join our retained Firefighters and would like to discuss how they might help, or simply learn more, please contact either Des or me for a chat. In the meantime, I am sure you, like me, would like to thank these brave neighbours of ours for all they do. Finally, please do say hello to me, or any of the Council who you see in the town, or feel free to pop along to the ‘surgery’ held every Thursday 6pm - 7pm in the Olney Centre for an informal chat. Remember we are here to support you and represent your views and we always welcome any feedback.
    unknown
    unknown
    unknown
    unknown
    Olney Council report for September 2021
    Public Speaks
    Public access to meetings  Mayor Phil Geach explained that at last month’s meeting a resident wanted to speak on a matter that was not an agenda item for that meeting. The Standing Orders approved by the previous council did not permit this, although they chose to ignore this rule. He had suspended that Standing Order on that occasion and explained that the council were currently consulting with Bucks Association of Local Councils (BALC) as to whether the Standing Orders could be amended to permit discussion on any subject in the future. In the meantime that rule would be suspended at this and all future meetings until a decision had been made. This was an agenda item later in the meeting where, after much discussion as to when and why this rule had been made in the first place, it was agreed to amend the Standing Orders at the next appropriate meeting, subject to advice from BALC. Public participation The only person wishing to speak was Lee Hindle regarding what she described as the ‘tatty and shambolic’ state of the town. In the past a temporary groundsman had been employed by the council for the summer months, but this had not happened this year. A previous groundsman had returned on a voluntary basis – mainly in the cemetery and churchyard, she said, in order that the other ground staff could get on top of the mammoth task of maintaining the rest of the town, and things did improve greatly. She commended Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy for her efforts and visibility but suggested that the ground staff need to ‘pull their fingers out’ to get the town back to looking as it had done in the past. Olney Health Hub As Chair of the Olney Development Group, Chris Tennant provided an update on the proposals to relocate the existing Cobbs Garden Doctors Surgery (CGDS) to vacant land adjacent to the Olney Youth Centre off Austen Avenue, as identified in the Neighbourhood Plan. CGDS has also considered the Warrington Road site on the edge of the town owned by a developer that has outline planning permission for a range of use. Also present from CGDS were Chris Herman (Advisor), Dr Maggie Winter and Practice Manager Penny Giraudeau. Presenting his report, Chris Tennant explained that the current medical centre opened in 1992 to serve 6,000 patients.  It now has 8,500 which will grow to 9,500 with the new houses being built. The practice would ideally like to reopen its list to surrounding villages where they have historically taken patients, and this could see their list grow to 12,000. Demand for appointments is high, one factor being the larger than average number of elderly patients. The current surgery does not meet current regulations in terms of building design, space, disability access, car parking and other areas. Primary care has changed over the last 30 years with increased medical care being provided in the community and this is likely to increase in the future, putting additional strain on the existing building. Not only does the practice need to increase the amount of clinical space but also the administrative area available to their staff. An independent review two years ago concluded that the current building is severely restrained and would need to double in size to meet current building standards, which would not be possible on the current site. They would like to incorporate a modern IT service and develop the role of telemedicine. There has been interest from a dentist and optician to provide a One Stop Health facility. The Youth Centre and adjacent land is currently owned by Milton Keynes Council. (For Info: MKC ceased funding Youth Services some years ago and since then the building has been in a steady state of decline. It was recently leased to a team of local volunteers who have undertaken some renovation work and opened it as the East Street Community Centre). There is a significant amount of Section 106 money (‘Planning Gain’ from the new housing developments) to support the project, circa £719k. If the partners were to own the new surgery the balance would be funded via ‘borrowing cost reimbursement’ or notional rent. The other option would be for a commercial developer to build and fund the development, again using the Section 106 money available.  In October 2020 some Section106 money was secured from MKC by CGDS, with the help of OTC, for the practice to appoint a professional advisor to look at a project feasibility study. The brief included site search/investigation, viability appraisal, NHS funding, heads of terms, and preparation of an outline business case and funding requirement from the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) in order to progress to the next stage. The advisor was appointed in October 2020 and has been working with CGDS on project feasibility and negotiation with MKC Property Services. Several meetings have been held between MKC and CGDS since December 2020 and initial designs for the Austen Avenue site prepared but the project seems to have stalled over issues such as how to fund and provide the replacement for the existing Youth Centre building. Discussions with Anglian Water over the sewer that runs below the site have been positive and with a 6m easement it is possible to locate the proposed Health Hub building and replacement Youth Centre on the site.  Considerable discussion then took place. The preliminary plan shows a new entrance to the facility off Austen Avenue, roughly where the existing Youth Club building stands. Colin Rodden was concerned about the increase in traffic and was keen to get public engagement for the whole project as soon as possible. Practice Manager Penny Giraudeau said that the Patient Participation Group had recently been revitalised and were keen to be involved in any consultations. With regards to replacement of the Youth Club building, the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) had expressed a preference for building refurbishment rather than replacement where possible, Colin said. He asked about CCG funding and Chris Herman said it was not guaranteed that they would agree to provide funding. It was important to get a commitment from MKC to release the land, he said. Leanne Ward asked what additional services CGDS would be considering providing on the site, expressing a preference for those lacking in town, rather than services such as dentist and optician which are already existing. Dr Winter explained that CGDS currently has patients with the smallest square footage of anywhere in MK and they are ‘bursting at the seams’ and had been for some time. The new premises would enable them to look at expanding their range of services and list, but that would be dependent upon employing additional doctors.  A new building on the Warrington Road development was being considered, but she would prefer to remain in the centre of town for ease of access. The surgery would still focus on providing a good core service, she said. Ward Councillor Peter Geary noted that CGDS proposed to fund the building of the new Youth Centre and pointed out that OTC had recent experience in the cost of building such a facility. The cost of building the Community Centre on the new Yardley Road development had turned out to be much higher than anticipated and he thought that a funding gap existed in this case to provide a similar sized facility, even with an element of Section 106 funding. Although in need of considerable renovation, the existing building is fundamentally sound, he said, and could be renovated at less cost than a new building. However, this would not deliver the benefits of a new building in terms of aesthetics, energy efficiency or usability. Chris Tennant said there appeared to be considerable support from MKC for a new building as part of the overall scheme. A vote was taken and it was agreed to support CGDS with their relocation plan. Mayor’s report A data connection hub has been installed in the High Street by MKC and no one seems sure what it’s for. It is apparently for topping up bus data points cards but is not located at the bus stop. Phil Geach said it had been installed without consultation to OTC or the conservation officer. MKC has apologised and it will probably be moved to the bus stop. The MK Connect service has been of variable quality and communication from MKC has been poor. They have promised to give OTC a seat at the table for future discussions around the service. Phil said he had also enquired about the possibility of an electric shuttle bus around the town when the Yardley Road development is built.  OTC Community Fund This fund, previously known as the Sidney Dix fund, after a local benefactor, is available to community groups in the Town. Chair of Finance Ben Brown explained that the application process has a yearly cycle with applications being submitted to the council by May, discussed at the finance committee in July and then ratified by full council in September. For a number of years the number of grants awarded have been minimal and therefore the pot has grown to circa £35,000. The money in this reserve cannot be spent by the council and can only be used for the purpose of community grants. The finance committee are proposing that the community fund is advertised more widely and the deadline and timetable for grants be temporarily suspended to allow applications at any time. Leanne Ward asked if schools could apply to the fund and Ben said he was of the opinion that schools fell within the criteria of community groups. It was agreed to suspend the existing application process for 12 months and allow applications to be made throughout the year. A current application of £500 from the Cowper memorial United Reformed Church towards a community quilt project for the Amazing Grace 250 celebration was approved, as was a grant of £3000 to the Rugby Club towards their new changing rooms Olney Fireworks The Olney Group (TOG) has requested permission to hold the annual firework display on the recreation ground on Sunday 7th November, subject to whatever Covid regulations and advice may be in place at the time. The council agreed to the request. Club House at Recreation Ground This item concerns the southern end of the Club House adjacent to the football pitch on the Recreation Ground adjacent to East Street, previously occupied by Olney Town Football Club and currently occupied by Caveman Conditioning. Following on from the detailed discussion at last month’s meeting, Jane Varley reported that legal advice had been obtained regarding the existing tenant confirming that they have rights as a sitting tenant. However, no lease has ever been signed so OTC are within their rights to go to the tenant and seek a review of this non-existent lease and to set a lease at a commercial rate. A building survey has been completed and the results were due on 17th September. An electrical survey is also planned but that will now be delayed until the results of the initial survey are available. Should the building be deemed unsafe to occupy then OTC would have a duty of care to ensure that Caveman Conditioning vacate the building. There was considerable discussion around whether the council would be liable in the meantime, but Peter Geary observed that none of the other council owned properties had received a full building survey recently, so it was taken on trust that they were safe unless there was evidence to the contrary. It was agreed to wait for the result of the survey before taking any further action.  The next meeting will be held on Monday 4th October, at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.


    Kitchener Centre Update
    The show will go on
    Following a meeting organised by Olney Town Council with Victoria Collins, Director of Adult Services and Andrea Natale, Head of Day Services, we have good news regarding The Kitchener Centre. 
    The Kitchener Centre, currently operating on Tuesdays and Thursdays, are intending to open for another day. They hope to have it up and running to five days a week as soon as possible. Rumours that any attempt to close the centre - as happened in 2015/16 - have been quashed. The local medical centres can refer people with care needs to the Kitchener Centre. We will be letting as many people as possible know so that more people with care needs can be introduced to the facility. We have been assured that while assessments are required, timescales will be kept as short as possible. It is hoped that it will be run by local staff. We will be looking into the possibility of the centre being used by others when it is not operating as a day centre. David Pibworth on behalf of  Olney Town Council.
    unknown


    Olney Council report for October 2021
    Sue Warren wished the Council to note the continued parking problems in Oakdown Crescent and asked that they took whatever action they could.
    No apologies received
    Declarations of Interest
    Ian Stokes and Chris Tennant both declared interest concerning item six of the agenda: Update of the Football Clubhouse
    Approval of minutes from OTC meeting on 6th September
    Trevor Aldred asked if a written report referred to in item 21/145 (proposed new Health Hub) had been circulated. Chris Tennant said that it had. Colin Rodden asked if there was any chance to engage with people living in the area proposed for the new Health Hub, land near East Street and Austen Avenue. He said he would like to see heightened engagement with them on it.
    Temporary Deputy Clerk appointment
    Mayor Philip Geach said that the council have appointed a temporary Deputy Clerk to assist in the council’s business, and asked for this to be retrospectively approved. Colin Rodden asked if the post had been advertised and Philip said no as it’s a temporary appointment. Chris Tennant said he thought the council had advertised for a temporary position and a permanent position and the Mayor said they had ‘gone out’ for a temporary Clerk’s appointment but had had no applicants. He proposed that 1) OTC approves the appointment of a temporary clerk and 2) they will review the situation on a regular monthly basis. Deirdre Bethune suggested they should review it up until Christmas saying it doesn’t have to be reviewed every month. Peter Geary agreed that a December review might be good with the question: does the temporary Deputy Clerk deliver the services we want delivered? Philip agreed that December is sensible for the review and proposed that it is brought up in the December OTC meeting.
    Request for an Olney Dog Show
    A request has been made to hold a dog show in the summer of 2022. Pre-Covid there was a dog show on the Rec and now an application has been made to use the recreation ground on Sunday 31st July on the field alongside the tennis courts, just past the toilets. Ian Stokes said the dog show was well organised last time with volunteers helping, plus they took all their rubbish home with them and the parking had been organised properly. Jane Varley asked where are they going to park this time? With a likely deluge of visitors, she said, do we allocate them parking? Ian Stokes remembered that previously they had parked sensibly adding that other visitors can use the available parking spaces. The charity Animals in Need would benefit from the event.
    Update on the Football Clubhouse
    Jane Varley reported that a recent report by a surveyor had stated that the Clubhouse building was safe to occupy. The key safety concern, she said, would be the electrical installations, ensuring they have been isolated and are maintained for the changing rooms to be used, and she added that a report on this should be sought. Once the inspection was complete a further report should be provided for any items deemed dangerous, but there was not an immediate risk to occupants. She said there should be a ‘Fragile Roof’ sign put up on the building’s roof and added that the building also needs a test for asbestos. Deirdre Bethune asked: was none of this done before? Jane replied that an electrician is providing a full report, but he has already suggested that the building is safe to use. Deirdre said she was more concerned about asbestos than the electrical issues.  Dan Rowland wondered whether it would be useful to get a Health & Safety report adding that the OTC is responsible for the building and yet can’t demonstrate that it has the situation under control. He added that it’s not known if there is asbestos present or, if it is present, whether it’s safe. Trevor Aldred said its echoes his experience of the Youth Centre where there were lots of safety issues to consider. Naomi Brock said they need to know for sure if there is asbestos and if so, is it covered under the building’s insurance. Dan said OTC have a duty to inform the insurers about asbestos when the building is being hired out. David Pibworth said that the fire escape was not good enough while Debbie Hall added that asbestos is only dangerous when it’s damaged. Colin Rodden said the fire doors need looking at and the tenant should be asked if he can make them safe. Philip Geach said they should investigate whether Health & Safety officials will carry out these surveys adding that he thought they definitely need to have an asbestos report. Leanne said the Clubhouse issue keeps coming back to the table and they keep spending more money going backwards and forwards with surveys. Jane Varley agreed: she said one report said to have a greater electrical survey while another said have an asbestos report. Naomi suggested there was no point spending more money on surveys if they were not going to use the building. Ian Stokes believed they were spending thousands on the building but only to ‘put a sticking plaster on it’. Dan Rowland said there were commercial activities going on at the building and yet OTC was not sure that it was safe. He said no commercial activities should now be allowed until it was declared safe, adding that OTC is responsible for the building. Deirdre Bethune said they should be coming to a decision on this. Philip Geach said the lease was delayed and then when it came close to anything being done, the repairs were deemed too expensive. Leanne thought it was not professional to expect the tenant to pay for all the repairs and to put the rent up too. Chris Tennant said the tenant had agreed to a graduated rent to offset the capital investment they were making. Chris added that the main issue with the building is that there was a legacy of under-investment in terms of its structure, water ingress and asbestos issues. He said there was support for the tenant on the basis that a commercial rent was put in place and the tenant brought the building up to acceptable standards. He suggested OTC should form a Working Group to meet with the tenant and discuss future rent arrangements and a package of remedial work. Debbie Whitworth said safety was paramount here. Ian Stokes asked if OTC need to spend more money on a building that they don’t know the future of. He said it’s drip, drip, drip spending all the time. Dan Rowland said that OTC needs to make sure the insurers are happy to continue insuring the building. And if not, can they find another insurer to cover it? Leanne noted that if the tenant has insurance, isn’t that enough? Peter Geary said there was building insurance in place but not public liability. He said much of the concerns are the tenant’s liability, not the council’s. David Pibworth said he did not want to affect someone’s running of a business but that safety issues have to be looked at. Philip Geach summed up that the concerns are: 1) The immediate safety of the building; 2) The tenant being able to continue there; 3) Insurance cover; 4) Health & Safety long term. Naomi said they should urgently write to the tenant and tell them if, for example, they can’t use the water. Ian agreed, saying that if there is no clean running water then you can’t have people working in the building. Philip Geach proposed, and it was agreed, to send a copy of the building report to the tenant adding that nothing in the survey says that the building is not safe. Peter Geary said, as we are lay people – we’re going round and round here and that this was the role of the proper officer. Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy said there were two reports. One said it was not unsafe and the other highlights electrical issues, stating that anything deemed unsafe is disconnected. The two reports say the building is safe, in her view. Ben Brown asked if they should allow the Deputy Clerk to commission the remedial works and asked if OTC were happy with the recommendation that the building was safe. Philip Geach said the Deputy Clerk should speak to the insurers and make sure the building is suitable but, if at any time it is deemed unsafe, then she can shut the building. This was agreed by councillors although David Pibworth abstained.
    Deputy Town Clerk’s Report
    The AGAR (Annual Governance and Accountability Return) is complete and there were no exceptional matters. A new caretaker has started and is working 25 hours a week which makes a combined total effort in the office of 84.5 hours. A groundsman has left the council and options for a new grounds team are being investigated. New IT equipment has been bought and new WiFi around the council building is working well. The Olney Centre is operating well and has been very busy with bookings and queries coming in every day.  The annual flailing of hedges has begun and bedding plants for Autumn/Winter need to be ordered. A decision as to which supplier to go with was required. Sarah Kennedy said she had received many complaints about weeds all over town. The grounds team are going to concentrate on the north and south entrances to the town (Bridge Street and Wellingborough Road) for weed maintenance. An Olney Middle School and Olney Infant Academy meeting took place which Debbie Whitworth attended. Debbie reported that Milton Keynes are running a programme called Modeshift Stars and schools that hold the right accreditation have seen many positives including cleaner air and road safety improvements. OIA had issues with weeds nearby and there has also been a recommendation to extend double yellow lines outside it. There is also a petition for a ‘20’s Plenty’ sign.  Chris Tennant said Red Routes were becoming quite overgrown and said that, to encourage parents to use them to take their children to school, could OTC make the routes safe. He said there were various routes completely overgrown. Sarah Kennedy said that this year has been ‘crazy’ with the growth of weeds. But she added that now that weeds are dying down, staff are starting to catch up with their maintenance.
    Expenditure Report
    Colin Rodden said he was looking forward to getting the library open and receiving more visitors. He said that FOLIO have received a grant from the Co-op to make it more user friendly and attractive.
    The Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 1st November, at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.

    Olney Council report for 1st November 2021
    Public participation
    There were no members of the public wishing to speak at this month’s meeting.
    Mayor's Report
    Mayor Phil Geach reported that the Cowper and Newton Museum AG250 committee (Amazing Grace 250th anniversary) have an Olney Town Council (OTC) representative post which was vacant, and he would be taking it up, unless anyone else wished to do so. They would be looking for support in their application to the Heritage Lottery Fund, and to purchase some heritage signs for the town for which an application to the OTC Community Fund would be made. Public engagement is key, and the museum will be looking to hold a public meeting early next year. Phil reported that he, Chris Tennant and Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy had attended a meeting virtual with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) housing department regarding protected housing on the Yardley Manor development. There will be 19 properties, varying from one-bedroom flats to five bedroom houses available for rent, which will be earmarked for residents of Olney or people with a strong connection with Olney to have ‘first bite’ at an affordable rent. Milton Keynes Council (MKC) are undertaking a publicity drive and a public engagement meeting was due to be held before the end of the month to provide more details to prospective residents. This year marks the 100th anniversary of the formation of the Royal British Legion and the remembrance parade would be taking place on Sunday 14th November. As an ex-serviceman David Pibworth would be placing the wreath on behalf of the council.  Summer security patrols Ian Stokes reported on the security patrols that took place for a period of eight weeks during the summer by a private security company to reduce the instances of antisocial behaviour. He said the feedback had been very positive, although they had been spoken to quite aggressively at times. They’d had incidents to deal with every weekend and he felt they’d done a good job. The council now needed to decide if they wanted to repeat it next year. Jane Varley said the council should consider how they wanted to manage ‘the whole nine yards’ to include litter, parking and antisocial behaviour so that they are not playing catchup again. Naomi Brock observed that antisocial behaviour continued to take place at the recreation ground so it was not something that could be dismissed just because the weather had changed. Phil said that funding for CCTV was being sought and he would report back in due course. He said he had not initially been in favour of the private security patrol but because of the positive feedback he was now a convert. It was agreed to revisit at the January 2022 meeting.
    Events for 2022
    The AG250 celebrations had already been discussed, said Phil, but the other big event was the extended Bank Holiday from the 2nd to the 5th of June for the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee. The main celebrations would probably involve street parties on Sunday 5th and possibly the lighting of the beacon on Barnfield. MKC Ward Councillor Peter Geary noted that for street parties to take place it was usually necessary to obtain a road closure order, as anything more than a cul-de-sac could cause problems. OTC could act as a conduit to MKC to facilitate this, he thought. Ian Stokes wondered if OTC should organise an event on the recreation ground instead of or as well as local street parties. It was agreed to form a small working party to look at the options.
    Football Club building
    This has been a subject of considerable discussion for some time and the saga continues: Phil reminded members that although the council try to discuss the issue in an open way they should be mindful of the need to avoid identifying individuals or businesses. Note: for the avoidance of any doubt, there is now a large sign on the outside of the building which says ‘Caveman Conditioning’. Jane Varley reported that structural, electrical, and asbestos surveys had been completed, the latter being a repeat of a previous survey which had come back ‘clean’. The others had identified that the building is safe to use but there is considerable work required to bring it up to spec. She proposed that three quotes should be obtained to identify the relative costs of repair and refurbishment or demolition and rebuild. Peter Geary agreed and thought that demolition might be cheaper as the council would be able to reclaim the VAT. Colin Rodden expressed surprise that the electrical report had identified cracked sockets as he thought council had already paid for repairs in the past. Jane responded that anything deemed unsafe had been disconnected. Peter Geary said that any electrical report would normally identify two things: Does it comply with the minimum safety standards and then a list of things that could be done to make it even better, the former being the present situation. He said that historically the council had experienced difficulty in getting comparable quotes when tendering for repairs, so it was essential to have a relatively tight brief. The current state of the building industry means that there is plenty of work available and builders are unlikely to even reply without such a brief. Dan Rowland was concerned that the report identified minimal RCD protection and questioned whether the council in a position to declare it safe. Jane replied that the electrician had passed it as habitable. Naomi Brock questioned whether the water was safe to drink, and Phil said the report identified that there are standing pipes which may pose a risk of Legionnaire’s Disease but does not state that the water is unsafe to drink. Naomi Brock expressed her frustration that this was the fourth meeting of the new council where the matter had been discussed, but Peter Geary thought that the decision to obtain quotes to bring the building up to a standard of which OTC could be proud was progress, although he had grave concerns that the council would not be able to afford it. Chair of Finance Ben Brown supported the proposal but said the unknown expense was making it very difficult to set a budget for next year.
    Odds and sods
    Dan Rowland reported that The Emberton Park Users Association are appealing for more volunteers. A fish survey to identify the number of fish in the lakes is to be carried out in November. Dogs will be banned from the conservation area and signage will be erected. The poplars along the road are to be cut down during the winter and a replanting scheme will take place. Exclusion of press and public ‘To consider exclusion of Public and Press Representatives pursuant to the Public Bodies (admission to meetings) Act 1960 on the basis that publicity would be prejudicial to the public interest by the confidential nature of the business to be contracted.’ Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy had urged members to vote in favour of exclusion on the basis that personnel matters were to be discussed. Items concerned included: • Personnel issues • Possible breach of GDPR •  Discussion revolving around legal matters the public circulation of which could be prejudicial to the council’s position and might in themselves give rise to legal proceedings. The motion was proposed, passed and Mercury duly excluded himself. 
    The Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 6th December, at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk:
    No December 2021 meeting was held due to Covid restrictions
    ----
     
    Mercury's reports for 2022
    Mercury report for the Council Meeting of January 2022 as printed in our February Edition
    January’s Olney Town Council meeting was shorter than usual due to Government guidelines on public meetings, which state that they should only be held where absolutely necessary and where they are held, they should be kept as brief as possible. The meeting was held in a larger room than normal in the Olney Centre and councillors’ chairs were well spaced out around its perimeter. Here is a summary of proceedings.
    Public Speaks
    The Mayor wished everyone a belated Happy New Year and started proceedings, asking if anyone from the public had anything they wished to say. Mr and Mrs Andrew Prosser from Olney said the pathway that connects Dinglederry to Rivetts Close had collapsed and appeared sunken where there are two traffic bollards. The sunken area is wet and full of leaves and they said they knew of people who had slipped over there. It was only a matter of time, said Mrs Prosser, before someone breaks a hip. Phil Geach said the matter would be referred to Milton Keynes Highways Department. Mr and Mrs Prosser also noted the dirty state of most of the town’s street name signs and said their son Marcus, also from Olney, would be prepared to get a team of volunteers together to wash them – would that be allowed? Mayor Geach said the idea would be considered and the Clerk would respond accordingly. Mr Prosser also noted the brightness of the street lights in his road. His house is illuminated by ‘daylight’ lights all night, he said, which even keeps the local blackbirds awake. Could they be turned down at all? The Mayor noted the address and said it would be referred to Milton Keynes Highways Department.
    Apologies for absence
    These were received from Chris Tennant, David Pibworth, Debbie Whitworth, Debbie Hall, Jane Varley and Colin Rodden.
    Previous minutes
    The Mayor requested that the minutes from the previous meeting in November (December’s gathering was cancelled due to Covid) be approved by councillors and asked if anyone had any points to raise. There were no points, and the minutes were approved.
    Schedule of meetings
    The Mayor said there was a draft schedule of forthcoming meetings to be approved. Deirdre Bethune said she would prefer it if the schedule was done half yearly and revisited after the May Annual Meeting. She said that the chairs of various committees might change during the year so it would make more sense to plan later meetings throughout the year. Phil Geach asked if there was any statutory reason why that can’t happen. The acting clerk Sarah Kennedy said that she would look into the options and schedule meetings accordingly. Ian Stokes asked if some Joint User Group (JUG) meetings could be scheduled in. Phil said the acting town clerk would look into the proposal.
    Budget 2022/23
    Phil Geach said that the next motion was to approve the Annual Budget and precept for the Following Year. He then invited Ben Brown, Chair of the OTC Finance Committee to speak. Ben wished to highlight some acknowledgements. He said Sarah Kennedy needed thanks for working on the budget papers over the last few months. It’s been a difficult job, he said, but he believed she had produced a good budget. He also wanted to thank those involved in budget setting last year. It was a difficult time with many uncertainties but it’s a budget that got us through that time with a projected surplus for the year, Ben said, adding thanks to all committees who have fed into the budget. On then, to this year’s proposed budget. The headline figures show they are projecting an income of £159,640.03 and expenditure of £466,825.49. This means the precept request will be £307,185.46 an increase of 3.4% on last year. Throughout the process, Ben said the feedback he received from councillors and residents was that they need to be mindful of the increased cost of living and to keep any increase in the precept minimal. The increase of 3.4% is below inflation and in line with the council tax increase by Milton Keynes Council.  The headlines from income are that they are predicting slightly increased income this year on the assumption of no further restrictions. We have very generously held rents and rates flat for this year, he said. This includes recreation ground rents, allotment rents, market stall fees and cemetery fees. They have also held flat pricing of room hire at the Olney Centre for local groups. This was a reflection of the feeling that sports clubs, social clubs and residents have experienced difficult times and it would be inappropriate to increase fees at this time. However, it is worth signposting now that having been held for two years, he said, an increase is likely across the board next year.  On income, Ben Brown said that this budget should not stand still. There will be work by the office to look at increasing revenue, particularly for services provided by the council to people outside the town.  On expenditure, the biggest cost as ever is staffing costs, Ben said. OTC are proposing an increase in the staffing budget this year, due to consideration of engaging two additional members of staff. This is in response to increased demand for services. That is a message across all our expenditures, he said, adding that they are seeing increased demand. They have had to increase the budget for dog bins, waste collection at the Rec and also security for the Rec in the summer months.  As with income we’re not standing still and actions will be taken to ensure the public are getting value for money, added Ben. Where grants are available to replace revenue expenditure he will seek to do so. Reserves currently stand at £251,571. This is broken down as follows: * earmarked reserves £116,122; * restricted reserves £75,643.56; * general reserves £59,806.  As part of putting this budget forward we are proposing that the finance committee urgently review reserves policy which will include reviewing the risk register, making an assessment of assets and making a recommendation to the council for reserves levels, said Ben.  He added that he will also be proposing, as earlier mentioned, that they formulate plans to increase revenue and monitor spending so the projected surplus for 2021/2022 is realised. Deirdre Bethune asked how Ben’s report states extra staffing when none had been approved. Ben replied that the staffing proposal would go before the HR committee and that to include it in budgeted items was prudent. Peter Geary said there had been some recent changes to the budget following a meeting last month, and asked what they were. Ben said there was a change relating to refurbishing the Market Place toilets. That was £10,000 and was originally going to come from the reserves but that had now been changed.  Deirdre Bethune said some income had come from the town’s hanging baskets. It’s £1,000 of income, she said. Ben agreed that it was £1,000 of income that they weren’t expecting. Peter Geary asked if the council’s budget would have a surplus or a deficit at the end of the year. Ben said that they were £80,000 better off than they were at the same time last year so they were projecting surplus, but he couldn’t say by how much right now. Peter Geary said that it’s good practice to monitor budgets throughout the year. It won’t be a straight line, he said, adding that the council should put forward how it wants to spend money. This expenditure is for the good of the town, he said, and if we are not spending it, we are not benefitting the town. Deirdre said the reason why there was a surplus was because of the unusual year last year in which not all the money was spent.  Mayor Geach said that it had been a difficult budget for the committee to prepare during Covid times in which they did not know what was happening in the future. They had no idea on income or expenditure he said, adding that Ben and Sarah had done a great job for which he gave his thanks. The Mayor also acknowledged that the previous Council had set a realistic and prudent budget and thanked the previous Finance Committee and Chair. Peter Geary agreed that it had been a difficult budget to report on. We look for savings, he said, and we look at extra costs against the things we wish to do.  Trevor Aldred added that he thought they should look closely at the whole reporting process.  Deirdre also offered her thanks and asked if the council accept the budget and the precept budget. Both of these were voted in favour.
    The Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 7th February 2022 at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk


    Olney Council report for February 2022 as printed in our March edition
    The February gathering of Olney Town Council (OTC) was well attended, with councillors, invited speakers and members of the public all present. With no December 2021 meeting taking place and a shortened version arranged for January, the agenda for this session was much longer with a long list of items on the agenda.
    The Olney Centre’s large meeting room was once again the venue for this meeting. Here is a summary of proceedings.  Mayor Philip Geach opened by mentioning the passing of Jock Smail, saying he would be sadly missed, and passed on his condolences to Jock’s family. The Mayor mentioned a letter received from resident Nigel Richards about lack of visibility for motorists at the zebra crossing near the One Stop and also up near the new Sainsburys where, he suggested, vegetation should be removed to improve visibility for traffi c turning towards Sainsburys. He also stated that the road closure on Lavendon Road from 12-23 February ‘will be awkward’ and are there any implications of Francis Jackson Homes residents wanting to park on the Olney side of the works?
    Apologies for absence
    These were received from Jane Varley and Colin Rodden, while Chris Tennant had signalled that he was going to be late attending.
    Declarations of interest
    These were noted from Ian Stokes (Olney Town Football Club), Trevor Aldred (Community Orchard) and Peter Geary (Landscaping).
    Previous minutes
    The Mayor requested that the minutes from the previous meeting in January be approved by councillors and asked if anyone had any points to raise. Deirdre Bethune said the resolution of the January meeting was subject to the clerk obtaining certain advice and that the minutes should refl ect what happened in the meeting, not what advice was obtained afterwards. Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy said advice had been obtained from the SLCC (Society of Local Council Clerks) and had been noted. Peter Geary proposed that the minutes be accepted as they stand. This was approved by all of the meeting except Deirdre, who declined.
    Landscaping Services Agreement with Milton Keynes Council
    Kay Pettit, Programme Manager for Parish and Town Councils at MK Council was invited to speak about the landscaping services in Olney for the next few years from 2023 when a new arrangement will have to be agreed. Pre-2014 landscaping in the town was paid for and carried out by MK Council. It was then decided to put it out to tender. MK Council were willing and happy for the devolution of landscaping services and Olney Council agreed to take it on. A similar decision was made in 2018. MK Council continued to sign up parish councils to deliver their own landscaping and in 2020 Olney signed up again. A new agreement is now being sought from April 2023 but ideally Milton Keynes Council is looking for an agreement by March. Maps and a list of service requests has already been sent to OTC, said Kay, but until Olney agrees, nothing can move forward. Deirdre asked if the grant from MK for landscaping actually covers the cost of the work. Kay said the amount was based on what Serco, a public services provider, charged MK for work which was then broken up across the borough. This figure, though, would not be known until later in the year. Ian Stokes noted that OTC was being asked to agree to sign up in March, but the actual cost would not be known until October or November. What if we don’t like the actual fi gure when that point arrives, he asked. Kay said OTC could still withdraw from the agreement at that time if they didn’t like it. Debbie Hall asked if it was possible to take over the maintenance of Olney’s play areas without actually owning them, adding that Olney’s play areas were ‘tattier’ than many of those in Milton Keynes. Peter Geary said that if OTC took them over, they would need to be in a useable state. Debbie said that if we were responsible for the play areas, we would have more immediate control over them.  Ian Stokes said there was lots of growth coming in the area, but the current maps don’t show that. Kay answered that MK Council would pay more for that upkeep if it was necessary. Phil Geach mentioned Whirly Pit Roundabout which Kay said had now been added to MK’s mapping system, although not in the current agreement, adding that ‘some very fast roads lead into it’. MK would like Olney to take on Whirly Pit Roundabout, but Phil Geach felt that, as they had the appropriate equipment and that it was not currently part of the existing agreement, MK should keep it, and at a safe level. Peter Geary said trees and foliage on the roundabout should be kept at low level, while Deirdre added that the rules seems to change between lots of growth to stop drivers ‘dashing through’ to cutting it all back. What will it be next year, she asked. Peter Geary said they really should make a decision before March and Ben agreed, saying it would be useful to know the costs.
    Hedging around the Amazing Grace Community Orchard
    Elaine Herniman and Rohan Wedge from the Community Orchard committee attended the meeting. They had fi rst asked if they could create an orchard in January 2019 and it was agreed in January 2021 that they could – and that it should be tied in with the Amazing Grace (AG250) celebrations this year when the town will start commemorations of the 250th anniversary of the world-famous hymn. They asked to change the lower end of the Allotment Field and had received funding from the MK Community Foundation and the Co-op Community Fund. They plan a 25 tree-planting session on 19th - 20th March which will include the planting of hedgerows to mark the orchard with a natural boundary and create an environment for wildlife too. There would also be a log circle erected, they plan to buy two large picnic benches and there would be two information boards and possibly some sculptures. The committee wanted to ask OTC if they could move ahead with this planning. Trevor Aldred asked if the two hedgerows would cause problems for existing growth, but Elaine said there would be no confl ict in putting hedgerows near the trees. Peter Geary asked if the equipment such as spikes used to protect the hedgerows would contain plastic. Elaine said equipment had been secured from the Woodland Trust but she was not sure if it was plastic.  Ian Stokes said he loved the whole idea but was worried about vandalism: would people hang around at night and turn the place into a fi repit? Elaine said that the area was near a well-trodden path and that there would be an element of self-policing by local people. She hoped residents would help to keep the area free of litter and look after it. Debbie Hall added that she thought teenagers tended to discipline themselves. The planting of hedgerows was agreed in favour, and the other equipment discussed would be presented and decided upon at a later date.
    Mayor’s Update
    Phil Geach said that last summer a ‘Data Point’ had appeared at the Market Place bus stop. He has had a meeting with Milton Keynes Council to discuss moving the equipment to the right of the bus stop or even put it inside the shelter. Deirdre asked if he could look at re-siting the ‘horrendous’ waste bin next to it. The rehousing programme on the Yardley Manor estate was going well. OTC had a good relationship with MK Housing , Phil said. There are 19 houses on the estate which MKC have agreed will be kept for Olney residents forever, he said, and added that further meetings are planned to discuss families that need help.  Two lifebuoys are ready for positioning by the water down at the Rec, said the Mayor. He asked what plans are being made for the Queen’s Jubilee celebrations. Dan Rowland, who is the Chair of the Working group responsible for Jubilee events, said that there were plans for celebrations on 4th June possibly using the Football Club. There might also be some staging where some events involving children could be held, such as singing ‘Amazing Grace’. People could also be encouraged to wear 1950s style costume or red, white and blue clothing. It would, he added, be like a town picnic and might encourage people to socialise with each other. There was also talk of a play about John Newton (the Olney-based cleric who wrote Amazing Grace). David Pibworth said that they had not received the rights to do this yet and this could take time to achieve and might not be possible. Better, perhaps, to ask people what they wanted to see. Dan Rowland said if residents wanted to take part in the celebrations the town could do something similar to the annual Dickens of a Christmas event, with stalls around East Street. He said vintage vehicles might be possible to arrange. They were also looking at lighting the town’s beacon. Ian Stokes said the ideas were very ‘weather-reliant’ and that there should be a ‘Plan B’ to weatherproof it. Debbie Hall pointed out that Newport Pagnell’s Vintage Event was planned for 4th June, so there could be a clash there. Deirdre Bethune said Olney’s event was a local aff air with the people of Olney performing. Debbie said local people would organise their individual street parties themselves, although Naomi Brock, while adding that there was a May Ball planned at the Rugby Club, asked how many people would prefer to organise a street party against coming to a town event.  Ben Brown said nothing had been budgeted for yet, causing David Pibworth to say that time was against them so they should move now more swiftly. Mayor Geach said they should perhaps plan one big event and plan a smaller one, as a ‘Plan B’ including lighting of the Beacon.
    Deputy Town Clerk Report
    Sarah Kennedy said she had received an email seeking approval to use the Market Place for the annual Motorama car event on 12th June. The River Festival was another event seeking permission. They want to use the Rec, said Sarah. The main part of the event would be on the rugby fi elds with the nursery fi eld being used as a marshal-controlled parking area. Deirdre Bethune was concerned that if the weather was bad this arrangement could ruin the fi eld, but Ian Stokes said no other events were planned there so it would probably be OK. He did though, ask for proper control of that parking area adding that when glass bottles are left there it can be dangerous for players using the pitch afterwards. Mayor Geach said approval could be granted subject to checks on the weather. The Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) was another request to consider but was approved in theory. Organisers were asking for permission to put a marquee on the Market Place, similar to that used for the Pancake Race. Peter Geary asked how the tent would be secured to which Deirdre replied it would be with stakes, which had not caused a problem in the past. Any holes were always fi lled in afterwards she added. Phil Geach said he had asked if fi xed pilot holes could be installed with some grant funding but was told ‘no’ because they were considered permanent.  Sarah Kennedy also said that St Peter and Paul Church asked to use the Glebe Field for parking. Deirdre said she did not think they should allow parking there and Ian said it would create a diffi cult access point. But Debbie Hall said this was literally for one or two days in the whole year – ‘yes’ the clerk added: 16th and 17th July. The Mayor said that allowing the parking would be setting a precedent, but Debbie thought they were objecting for nothing. Naomi Brock believed that access would be diffi cult and Church Street could end up ‘rammed’ and dangerous. The Mayor wanted to know if the fi eld would be matted and marshalled. Clarifi cation would be sought from the organisers. The clerk said that an interim internal audit took place in December. The report concluded that ‘there has been a signifi cant improvement over the course of the year’. The Mayor said that our thanks to Sarah for her hard work should be minuted. Sarah reported that discussions were taking place with the Cricket Club to arrange using OTC’s equipment during the forthcoming cricket season. The council have been making insurance arrangements for this initial trial period. Sarah added that arrangements will be reviewed again after the initial trial period.  The clerk said that a safety report on the MUGA (Multi Use Games Area) had come back fi ne. The goalposts needed securing and there were some problems with broken glass and mould on the surface but once this was sorted, the MUGA would re-open.  A number of grant applications had been made: £40,000 was available for certain work. Application had been made in respect of the redecoration of the Market Place toilets, and the planting of trees around the Market Place; and lights for next Christmas. She added that the Olney Centre was busy and had received many requests about holding birthday parties.
    Tennis Club new floodlights
    Phil Geach said the Tennis Club wanted to renew its fl oodlighting. LED lights have been asked for, he said, and OTC can have a say as they are the landlords. It could be approved in principle subject to any planning application and conditions. He asked if OTC accept the proposal and that was carried.
    Policing in Olney
    Mayor Geach said that, following an informal meeting with the police, they have said that policing, including spot checks will be increased during the summer on the Rec. Their approach will be more robust and tickets will be issued. There will be a general increased visibility of PCSOs. Phil said he spoke to Matthew Barber (Thames Valley Police and Crime Commissioner) recently but was waiting for a response from him. Naomi Brock said that she had been hearing about the increase in PCSOs for some time and asked if anyone knew what their shift patterns were.  Phil said they don’t usually work during the night. Naomi said OTC really need to keep a closer eye on what the police actually do this year – she didn’t believe anything would change. Phil said the police wanted to change the way they do things, but, at present, are limited to the hours in which the neighbourhood team operate. The hours, he said, are the problem. David Pibworth complained that the police say they are going to do something more and then they don’t. The police are not good enough, he added, and we have to address that. Leanne asked that OTC really try to produce ‘something different’ this year to show they are trying to change things. Peter Geary said he could ask Milton Keynes Council for another PCSO. Phil asked if he would take that plan forward and Peter said he would ‘certainly ask’. Debbie Whitworth said Olney was not on the police radar because the town is ‘too nice’ and Ian Stokes agreed saying we do have to do something ourselves.  David Pibworth asked if councillors thought residents would pay more to have ‘their own police force’ even though they are already paying for one (in their Community Charge).  Debbie Hall said we don’t need to pay for a full year’s policing. We need more police in the summer, for example down at the Rec, along with security personnel, but we don’t need it all year. Naomi disagreed: ‘we need it all year round’ she believed. David Pibworth said some people don’t know how to report issues to the police on-line. Could we get a liaison councillor of some kind, he asked. Phil said that he didn’t believe that the police will accept reports of crime from “third parties”. Debbie Hall said she tried to report an issue on the ‘101’ police line and it just rang out. Police should be going into schools, talking to teenagers, investing time in the local area. Children would respond well if they had talks with the police, she believed, adding that if the police were increasing giving out tickets the teenagers would know something was happening in the town. Leanne said OTC should concentrate on the policing side of it. Having people on the ground generally does disperse groups. The key to it, she said, was providing a feeling of security for residents.
    Football Club building update
    Deputy Clerk Sarah Kennedy said she was hoping for a report on the building in the next few days. We have done all the investigative work, she said, and soon we can make a decision on it. The tenant of the building was aware of this and would be kept informed, she added.
    Johnsons Field ownership
    Phil Geach said he discovered that OTC has a 999 year lease arrangement on the fi eld and was waiting now for a report about what the intentions are for the playing area there. 
    Possibility of hybrid OTC meetings
    The word ‘hybrid’ is a bit of a misnomer – in this context it means fi lming or recording the meeting so that more people can follow what’s happening even if they are not there. David Pibworth asked if OTC would allow a camera to show the meeting going on or even just recording equipment so that residents could listen in. Mayor Geach said that it might make it easier for residents to follow and take notes.  Ben Brown said that the cost should not be a problem but that there was a chance councillors might say different things when they were being recorded than if it was an unrecorded meeting. They might be worried that something could be taken out of context, he added. Leanne said she would object for that very reason: that things are misunderstood, it gets put on to social media and then councillors feel the backlash of that from residents. It has happened to her in the street before, she said.  Debbie Hall said she would be against filming meetings but is not so concerned about recording them. Phil Geach said it might be useful for people who can’t attend a meeting to at least know what’s going on, even though councillors doing so could not vote in that way. However, he said it had potential subject to further investigation and costs being established. Dan Rowland accepted the point about views being misunderstood but he added that councillors are only there because the people of Olney have put them there and they agreed to take on the role. Peter Geary said if it cost £500 to organise some kind of recording equipment all well and good, but if it was £5000, he would not be so agreeable. Let’s get the costs, he said. Sarah Kennedy said that the scheme would involve a lot of internal work for council staff. Sarah pointed out that when meetings were live streamed during Covid that the average number of listeners was three.
    Constitution of committees
    Discussion was had over possible splitting of the Recs and Services Committee into two due to its large size and also combining HR with fi nance. Due to the crossover of decisions it was agreed that further work be done on this. The HR committee was discussed in which Naomi Brock and Debbie Whitworth were considered for inclusion. Deirdre said it was the only committee limited in numbers. Ian Stokes said he was happy to resign from the committee to allow Naomi and Debbie in. Colin Rodden can not take his place currently as he is injured and unavailable. It was proposed that Naomi and Debbie replace Ian and Colin, which was carried.
    This is my header
    Next Meeting - March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday, March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting. or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.


    Olney Council report for March 2022 as printed in our April edition
    Apologies
    Ian Stokes and Trevor Aldridge. Phil Geach arrived later to the meeting which was initially chaired by Naomi Brock. Office minutes were taken by Jane Brushwood in the absence of the town’s Acting Clerk who was sick.
    Public Participation
    A 15 minute forum open to the public.  Two members of the public wished to speak:  The first was Stuart Dorrill who gave a talk regarding the leased premises used by his company Caveman Conditioning and discussed later in the agenda. He asked two questions: • How passionate are Olney Town Council in supporting the health and well-being of residents? • How important to OTC are local businesses to the town? He reminded councillors that Caveman now employs nine local people from Olney.  The second speaker and resident was Andrew Prosser who wanted to thank OTC for progressing a street lighting issue in Dinglederry.
    Declarations of Interest
    Declarations of interest were stated by Peter Geary (knowledge of a land agent) and by Chris Tennant (trains with Caveman Conditioning) regarding items discussed later in the meeting.
    Approve minutes of 7 Feb 2022
    Debbie Whitworth stated that she and David Pibworth were incorrectly recorded as not attending the last Full Council meeting.
    Expression of town’s solidarity with Ukraine.
    After discussion on this subject it was proposed that OTC would put Ukrainian fl ags at both the Olney Centre and the Market Place to show solidarity with the Ukrainian people. Dan Rowland additionally suggested that the Clerk check that there are no fi nancial or energy links with Russia and it was agreed to investigate this.  Debbie Hall said that posters showing solidarity were also available from the Phonebox Magazine, which have been produced by Orchard Press at no charge, and that she and Alex Thomsen would be organising Ukrainian flags down the High Street as a private initiative. Deirdre Bethune suggested fl ags could also be put on existing High Street Christmas tree brackets should residents wished to do this.
    Speed Watch initiative
    Information was given by Keith Wheeler (MK Council) and Lee Turner (Thames Valley Police) regarding Speed Watch initiative. This was a partnership (paid for by a grant from the Police & Crime Commissioner) that allows local councils to participate in gathering data about speeding problems in a more coordinated way for the benefi t of residents. It permits hand-held devices to be used by authorised volunteers at ‘hot spots’. Speeding drivers will be checked rapidly for valid road tax and MOT and will receive graduated warning letters followed by enforcement action. Evidence of persistent speeding will start the process of looking at suitable traffic management such as road signs, speed indicators, calming etc.
    Napier parking and parking management in Olney
    Napier parking presented outline proposals for the East Street sport’s club car park covering structural matters such as pot holes, white lining, signage. payment (such as pay and display, permits and exemptions) and legal enforcement including using ANPR cameras and wardens. This would be for a possible fi ve year contract. It was confi rmed Napier had no power to remove a vehicle. Total income generated for these 100 spaces was estimated at around £60-70,000/year with a proportion of this going to OTC. Ben Brown suggested that OTC should consult with users as parking charges were always controversial amongst both visitors and residents. Chris Tennant asked that in the interests of procurement transparency, more than one tender be sought. Jane Varley would work up a proposal and put this to a full committee of OTC.
    Mayor’s update
    New trees were now being planted around the edge of the Market Place that were due to bloom shortly. It was noted by Mercury that these trees were coupled to fi rm posts and protected by a steel ornate cage to hopefully give protection from careless parking. Work on completely refurbishing the toilets had begun which will include a mother and baby/disabled user push-button access. This was fi nanced with the help of a grant. The Cherry Fair was now going ahead after all. New grant-funded Christmas lights for the High Street/Market Place had been obtained. Another two families had benefi tted from the new aff ordable housing in Olney, although it was noted that help had been requested with regard to fl ooring and white goods that was not initially supplied in these properties.
    Landscape Services Agreement
    It was agreed that from April 2023, existing arrangements would stay in place, but it was noted that this would not include any local council work on the Whirly Pit roundabout (for example cutting down vegetation) which would have been prohibitively expensive. That work would continue to be done by MK.
    Review proposed changes to OTC’s reserves policy
    Ben Brown proposed that the reserve policy document changes would put the duty on the Responsible Financial Offi cer (Town Clerk) to make a recommendation on reserve levels. This should be reviewed every year. It was also proposed that full council accept a reserve of a 35% target for net revenue expenditure by March 2025. This was agreed. MK Northeast Rural Community Forum Phil Geach agreed to represent Olney at the MK Northeast Rural Community Forum formally named the Neighbourhood Action Group. User groups, police and parish councils meet quarterly.
    Live streaming meetings
    Phil Geach had investigated possible costs for making council meetings available to the public after they had taken place. In particular, he had looked at the example and costings of Stantonbury that had successfully introduced a video system for later playback. It was estimated that in Olney, the cost would be around £5000. It was noted by Mercury that such a system was proposed at the previous council meeting by David Pibworth and others in the interests of transparency, openness and democracy. After much discussion about the numbers of people who might want to watch meetings after they had taken place (Deirdre Bethune controversially suggested three!), it was emphasised by Naomi Brock and Colin Rodden that it was important to put this to the town via both an OTC page and in the Phonebox so that a meaningful level of support was obtained. This proposal was supported unanimously.
    Reports on the condition of the fabric of the council premises, formally the Football Club
    Following a recent OTC report on subsidence together with costings for building and roof repair, there were additional possible costs reported by Jane Varley on drainage issues. As a business was currently operating on the premises (Caveman Conditioning), costings would be provided to councillors at the end of the council meeting where the public were excluded with regard to demolish, repair or demolish and rebuild. It is understood by Mercury that this item was again deferred to a future meeting given the large potential costs involved, estimated to be nearly half a million pounds, for full demolish and rebuild.
    Queen’s Jubilee
    Queen’s Green canopy
    A discussion took place on a number of potential locations for seven trees representing seven royal decades of service. Sites especially considered included the Community Orchard (near the allotments) and Barnfi eld (at the town’s beacon location off Aspreys). Although the trees were now ready to be planted, Peter Geary said that the council needed to understand the eventual height of tree and soil type to determine a suitable position and, if Barnfield was chosen, to ensure that rare fl ora that included orchids, were not damaged in the process. The final decision was delegated to Jane Varley as Head of Recs and Services who would consult with the arboreal expert at Milton Keynes for advice, location and design.
    Jubilee event
    Dan Rowland as head of the Jubilee event working party explained that he and his team had put in considerable work on this and had had enthusiastic off ers of help and participation from the schools, Cowper and Newton (Amazing Grace 250th celebration) and Royal British Legion as well as a number of arts-based contributors such as the Saltmine theatre company. The event, including stage hire, had been fully costed and potential funds found from a Milton Keynes Arts Council grant covering the cost of £8,800. This ensured there would be no cost to Olney Town Council. Given the interest and demand for such an event after two years of Covid restrictions, Dan believed there was great enthusiasm to celebrate the Jubilee and requested that the above funds be underwritten by the council in the unlikely event that the grant application were to fail. However to the surprise of shocked councillors and visitors, the news was revealed that Olney Town Council office had pre-emptiveley withdrawn the application without adequate explanation to the working group.  As a result, one working group councillor, David Pibworth, had resigned. Dan added that while the office had mysteriously and embarrassingly blocked the resubmission of the application, he understood from MK that it would still be possible to resubmit if there was suffi cient goodwill and support by the council. Phil Geach said as the Clerk’s line manager that while he had no information about the reason for the withdrawal, he would find out what had happened and report back
    [STOP PRESS: Application rejected]
    It was agreed that there would be a further discussion to resolve this critical Jubilee event agenda item on Thursday 10th March 2022. The meeting ended with two remaining agenda items where there were no comments on items reviewing OTC Expenditure or Representations at external meetings.
    Special adjourned council meeting to discuss the Jubilee event held on Thursday 10th March
    Phil Geach said there may have been some ‘confusion’ over the application process and thanked the working group team for their hard work, adding that their on-line submission had been very detailed. The Mayor added that there had been much heated discussion on this subject and everyone owed a duty of courtesy to each other. He then invited further comment. Dan Rowland agreed that there had been much misunderstanding but it was time now to put that behind us, move forward and put the application back on track for the sake of the town. He proposed resubmitting the application.  Debbie Whitworth stated that a huge amount of eff ort had been put into this event to date and Chris Tennant and Naomi Brock believed OTC should now look positively at this important town occasion. The Head of fi nance, Ben Brown, admitted that it had been a mistake to not include this event in the budget and while he could not agree to underwriting the occasion itself he did support it in principal. He added that in any case the Queen’s green canopy and tree planting should be considered by the public as a signifi cant contribution by the council. Jane Varley believed that this event was rather ‘niche’ but this was strongly challenged by Dan Rowland and Naomi Brock who pointed out that up to 1000 school children and their families were involved as well as expected visitors to the cultural acts and the ‘picnic in the park’ celebration. Peter Geary however believed that a reference to 2000 people should be downgraded just in case this fi gure was not realised as this might affect future applications. Ian Stokes also believed that a successful event might dilute attendance to the town’s pubs! Colin Rodden felt that such talk was rather negative and suggested that councillors should get behind this application more enthusiastically and patriotically. Colin added that as the event falls in next year’s budget, perhaps some finances could be found from there. Peter Geary recommended that the Amazing Grace participation be removed to cut down on costs but it was pointed out by Dan that the submission included a requirement to include two or more cultural partnerships. In the meantime Phil Geach outlined his own separate attempt to organise an evening Jubilee event at Barnfi eld (involving fi reworks and beacon lighting) and was confident in fi nding sponsors in due course. At this stage no grant application had been made and it was simply at the ‘expression of interest’ stage. The quoted cost of fi reworks alone was in the region of £3000-£6000 and there was some discussion – previously led by Deirdre Bethune – whether loud explosions were appropriate at this sensitive time of invasion in Europe. It was agreed to consider ‘quiet’ fi reworks as a possible alternative.
    Conclusion
    The Mayor, Phil Geach, stated that he now supported the event and given that children would be key participants, said that he was probably able to off er £2000 of sponsorship money. Mercury understands this cash was generated by local egg sales earlier in the year by school children. He added that more volunteers might need to be co-opted to the working group as well as on the event itself which was agreed.  Finally while a proposal to underwrite this event by Colin Rodden was rejected by a majority of councillors, a second proposal agreeing to urgently resubmit the application itself was supported unanimously.
    Next Meeting of Olney Town Council Monday 4th April


    Olney Council report for April 2022 as printed in our May edition
    Opening Statement
    Mayor Phil Geach opened the meeting by explaining that normal procedure would be for the meeting to commence with the 15 minute open forum Public Participation item but this month he would be suspending a particular Standing Order (3F for those that follow such matters) so that an item not on the agenda could be discussed. Mercury assumes that this means the following will not appear in the o fficial minutes of the meeting.
    Standing Order suspended
    Phil said a letter had been received from a member of the public which he felt was of such importance that he was happy for it to be read out and he would also answer the questions raised therein. Deputy Clerk Jane Brushwood then read out some extracts from the letter. The correspondent said she was perplexed by what she had read in Phonebox Magazine regarding the application for a grant from Milton Keynes Council (MKC) for the Queen’s Jubilee and the fact that a councillor had resigned over the matter.  Why was the application withdrawn, she asked, and if it was due to an administrative technicality this was not an acceptable reason as any grievances should have been ‘ironed out’ before the application was withdrawn. Why had the item vanished from the agenda of the current meeting?, she asked. Phil explained that he hadn’t personally withdrawn the application and nor did he instigate the withdrawal. The Clerk, otherwise known as the ‘Proper Offi cer’, is the only person authorised to submit grant applications on behalf of the council, he said. The Clerk is also responsible for ensuring that the council does not commit any act which might leave it legally exposed. He went on to say that members of the Jubilee working group had requested that the Acting Clerk submit an urgent application, due to the impending deadline. The Acting Clerk contacted the mayor and asked if the application could be submitted and retrospectively approved at the next council meeting, to which he agreed. Two members then asked the Acting Clerk to assist with the application, which she did by email but made clear to the members that they should not submit the application themselves as they did not have the authority to do so, and all such matters should go through her.  Milton Keynes Community Foundation then replied via email saying that the application should be submitted online. The working party, being keen to meet the deadline, submitted the online application but neglected to inform the Acting Clerk. Two days later the Acting Clerk received a copy and noted that not only had it been submitted without her knowledge or approval it had now been amended to include a statement which could be misleading as it stated that the council intended to work with other named community groups in the future, which had never been discussed or agreed by the council.  Following independent legal and professional advice the Acting Clerk concluded that whatever the motivation it would be wholly inappropriate for the application to proceed so she withdrew it. Dan Rowland, a member of the working party, attempted to interject at this stage saying that was one side of the matter and asked for the right to reply but Phil refused, saying it was not part of the meeting.  [The reason neither Dan, nor indeed any other councillor, was able to speak at that time was that the letter was only able to be answered as it was addressed directly to the Chair not the Council as a whole. As it was not an agenda item discussion was not allowed under Council Rules.] Phil said he had no doubt that the working group acted with the best of motivations and the Acting Clerk did what she thought was right in terms of legal procedure and governance. There was no judgement, those were just the facts, he said. In answer to the question of why it had been removed from the agenda Phil said it had never been on the agenda, so it had not vanished.  Dan Rowland once again attempted to interject but Phil said he was just responding to questions asked in the letter. He concluded by saying that he hoped the questions had been suffi ciently answered and people would now move on and try to do something that was right and worthwhile for the town. The correspondent had also made a comment about Phil personally, saying he didn’t know ‘how the town ticks’. Phil admitted that he wasn’t born in Olney but moved here after careful consideration and had grown to love the town, fi nding the residents kind, supportive and considerate. He said he disagreed with the author, listing several things that he considered made Olney tick whereby people give their time freely to the community. 
    Public Participation
    Joanne Eley asked why the Union Flag was not fl ying alongside the Ukraine fl ag by the war memorial in the Market Place. Phil said the council would reply in writing as the item was not on the agenda.  Nigel Richardson said he moved to the town seven months ago and living near Sainsbury’s was aware of the problems concerning the Whirly Pit roundabout. He said that the roundabout was too big and should ideally be completely reprofi led but recognised that that would be expensive. As a minimum the vegetation which was currently preventing a clear view of the pedestrian crossing outside of Sainsbury’s should be removed. Referring to the crossing outside of One Stop, he said it is impossible to see pedestrians waiting to cross at night because the white lights on the poles are too bright and there are too many bollards nearby. Moving on to the various sets of roadworks that had taken place in the locality, he said there were problems with the protocols operated by Milton Keynes Council (MKC) which were evident in other villages too. Contractors shut the roads for far longer than necessary and do no work for much of the closure. He asked that residents complain to MKC and suggested there should be penalties for overrunning. Lastly, he said that when the MK East development starts there is a potential closure of the A509 between J14 and Newport Pagnell for up to six months which OTC needs to be aware of.
    Whirly Pit Roundabout Public Consultation initiative
    Debbie Whitworth reported that following on from a visit from herself, Ward Councillor Keith McClean and an MKC Safety Officer, MKC had confi rmed that they would continue to review and monitor the situation regarding the pedestrian crossing on Lavendon Road. Many members of the public had expressed their dissatisfaction with the CCTV footage and survey, and the fi ndings of the report that there were no problems regarding pedestrian safety. Debbie said she had emphasised that there had been major changes since the roundabout had been installed, with new housing, retail outlets, supermarket and a future nursery which would all have a huge impact on the dangers associated with more traffi c and higher footfall. MKC are aware of the poor sightlines caused by the vegetation and will regularly cut it back, but Debbie said that was insuffi cient and she will push for total removal of the vegetation. She said in that past week she had been made aware of three ‘near misses’ and as a result parents were not happy for their children to walk to school, which was in turn leading to more cars in the vicinity of the school. Debbie suggested that there should be a public consultation questionnaire on the matter and asked that the council support the suggestion. She said that the MKC Safety Offi cer was fully supportive of a survey but when questioned by Deirdre Bethune as to whether MKC would fund it she replied that they wouldn’t. A discussion then took place as to the best format of the questionnaire to gain the maximum exposure that wouldn’t be totally web based. Deirdre felt that it was important to understand the costs involved and Phil Geach said the wording would need to be chosen carefully so as not to include leading questions which could infl uence the outcome. It was agreed to seek the views of the public regarding the Whirly Pit roundabout and traffic management. A small working group will defi ne the questions which will then be agreed by the full council.
    Odds and Sods
    Stuart Dorrill had written to ask that the minutes of the previous meeting be amended to include the correct name of his business Caveman Conditioning, not Bodyforce. The Rugby Club’s annual 7s tournament will take place on Saturday 18th June and the club have asked for permission to use the Nursery Field (football pitch) for car parking, which was granted.
    Council co-option procedures
    Following the resignation of David Pibworth, a vacancy now exists on the council. Phil Geach explained that an election would be called if within 14 days of a vacancy being declared 10 members of the electorate requested an election. No such request had been received so the vacancy will now be widely advertised and fi lled by co-option at the June meeting. Advertisements will be placed on the town noticeboard, the OTC website and in the Phonebox. A policy document for co-option exists which had been sent out to all councillors for review and none had any comments.
    Exclusion of press and public
    ‘To consider exclusion of Public and Press Representatives pursuant to the Public Bodies (admission to meetings) Act 1960 on the basis that publicity would be prejudicial to the public interest by the confi dential nature of the business to be contracted.’  The items on this part of the agenda were: • An update on personnel matters • To discuss and approve a proposal relating to the future of the Football Club building at the recreation ground. The motion was proposed and passed so Mercury and the seven members of the public present duly excluded themselves.
    Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 9th May, at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Annual Town Meeting
    The Annual Town Meeting will take place at The Olney Centre on Friday 20th May at 7:00. All Olney residents are permitted to attend and question their Town Councillors, Ward Councillors, and police representatives.


    Olney Council report for May 9th 2022 as printed in our June edition
    Annual Meeting with elections of officials, etc.
    This sitting was the Annual Meeting of Olney Town Council – an important gathering which included the election of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor among the items on the agenda. New Town Clerk Jane Brushwood also took a place at her fi rst OTC next to Mayor Phil Geach.
    The Mayor started the meeting by saying that as usual there would be a 15-minute open forum Public Participation section and that, as with last month, he was suspending Standing Order 3F which meant that an item not on the agenda could be spoken about. 
    Public Participation
    Resident Kevin Viney gave mention of how proud he was that Olney has shown its support for the people of Ukraine by fl ying their fl ag in solidarity and of the town’s residents who have given generously to this cause. He also had a point to make about the Annual Veterans’ Dinner, saying: ‘I’d like to make a small mention of how proud I feel for our town which has shown its support for the people of Ukraine by fl ying their fl ag in solidarity and of course for the many residents who have given generously to this cause in other ways.  ‘I was however taken aback to hear a proposal that the Annual Veterans’ Dinner should be downgraded from a full meal with drinks to simply tea and cake in order to save money. Is that really the best we can do for those who have served this country and to remember in some cases people who gave their lives? ‘I listened to a lone voice, councillor Rodden, who argued for the main meal to be restored and who wondered, in comparison, how it was that OTC could spend tens of thousands of pounds on legal fees following a grievance complaint from a former member of staff . He was told to keep quiet despite this fi nancial information being in the public domain. As it happens, the Head of the Finance sub-committee later confi rmed that at least £4,000 of hospitality money went unspent during the Covid years and a veterans’ full meal would be a small fraction of this. ‘So, could I ask the council to reconsider this rather mean-spirited decision – and to do so by the 20th May for the Town Meeting – where I note incidentally that wine will be served by the council to the public seemingly without any embarrassment or irony.’ The points made were noted by the Council.
    [Editor’s note: following this OTC meeting, the council decided that the Annual Veteran’s Event will include a buff et, consisting of sandwiches and wine, along with tea and cake.]
    Election of the Mayor
    Before moving on to the election procedure, Phil Geach asked the Council to bear with him for two minutes. As you know, he said, I’m not standing. But I want to say thank you so much for doing me the honour this time last year of electing me to be Mayor. It had been a thoroughly enjoyable year for the most part, he added to a hushed room, even with a few trials to overcome. But overall it had been a great honour and whoever took over from him would do an ‘even better job’, he said. If there was not a clear majority on the fi rst vote, Phil said he was unwilling to use his ‘casting vote’ and would put the vote back to Council. If, after a second vote though, the situation was the same, he said he would reluctantly use his vote. As it turned out, that was not going to be needed. Ian Stokes thanked Phil for his time as Mayor. It was a very diffi cult year, he said, but he wanted to thank Phil for ‘everything he had done for the town’.  Only two council members were put forward for the vacant post: Ben Brown, nominated by Ian Stokes and seconded by Jane Varley, and Debbie Whitworth, nominated by Dan Rowland and seconded by Debbie Hall.  Members voted and Ben Brown was elected Mayor by a clear majority. Ben accepted the decision with thanks and best wishes from the outgoing Mayor. He thanked Debbie Whitworth for standing, saying ‘it’s always good to have a choice’. He thanked Phil for his year in offi ce and acknowledged the work that the Mayor had put in. 
    Election of the Deputy Mayor
    Dan Rowland nominated Debbie Whitworth for this position which was seconded by Naomi Brock. There were no other nominations so a ‘paper’ vote was not deemed necessary. Councillors were happy to agree the appointment with a show of hands and it was carried unanimously.
    Apologies for Absence
    Moving on to business, there was one apology for absence, Leanne Ward. Nobody had a declaration of interest to register, and the minutes of the last meeting in April were deemed an accurate record.
    Annual Business
    We have lots to cover here, said new Mayor Ben, now in the chair with the offi cial chain around his neck. Let’s do it line by line, he said. Receive the minutes of the last meeting by various committees: There were no comments or amendments so Ben suggested the minutes for Finance, Planning and ODG (Olney Development Group) were acknowledged as received. Many of the items on the agenda had come direct from Standing Orders said Clerk Jane Brushwood, so they were unlikely to attract comments or amendments from Councillors. ‘Consideration of the recommendations made by a committee’, for example, brought no comments. It was the same for ‘Review of delegation arrangements to committees, staff and other local authorities’ and ‘Review the Scheme of Delegation and Terms of Reference’. Appointment of Members to Committees: The next agenda point concerned councillors joining various bodies. The Dickens Committee currently contains Phil, Deirdre Bethune, Naomi, Ben and Debbie Whitworth. Did anyone want to leave that group or join it, asked the Mayor. There were no changes. The Finance Committee currently includes Trevor Aldred, Phil, Peter Geary, Debbie Hall, Colin Rodden and Ben, and there were no changes. The HR Committee’s Jane Varley decided to leave while Colin nominated himself to join. The Olney Centre Management Committee, the Olney Development Group, Planning Committee and Recs and Services Committee all remained the same. There were no appointments of any new committees so the agenda moved on to the review and adoption of Standing Orders. Ben suggested that, as the current Standing Orders might be out of date, the council should accept them now with a view to reviewing them and bringing them back for adoption at the council’s July meeting. Jane Varley asked if the whole committee could get involved with that and Ben said that a working group should do it. Peter Geary said that the recommendations that were being made for changes and those things that were up for discussion for change, should be explained, as that would cut down a huge amount of time for other council members. No issues could be seen in terms of the review and adoption of Financial Regulations apart from bank signatories which would be dealt with later. Review of representation on or work with external bodies: Councillors make themselves available to sit on other bodies, such as charities. Chris Tennant volunteered to take a place on the Ann Hopkins Smith Almshouses Charity, Trevor Aldred and Dan Rowland volunteered themselves to help with the Cowper & Newton Museum, Deirdre Bethune volunteered for PLUG ([Emberton] Park Liaison Users Group), Debbie Whitworth for the Olney Ward Forum and Ben Brown put himself forward for Milton Keynes Association of Local Councils. Ian Stokes volunteered for the Olney Pre-School, and Debbie Hall said she would be the link between the council and Olney Senior Citizens. It was agreed that nobody from the council has sat on the Olney Chamber of Trade for some time, and the Clerk said the Parishes Forum was one for the Milton Keynes Council to deal with. Peter Geary said that was relatively important because it dealt with matters that aff ected all parishes. Ben and Debbie Whitworth agreed to be the points of contact for that. For the Wind Farm Fund Committee, former Councillor Mike Hughes has in the past attended on behalf of OTC. It was proposed that he be asked to continue in this role. Keyholders were confi rmed as Phil, Deirdre and Naomi with Naomi and Deirdre as emergency contacts.  For inventory of land, buildings and equipment, Ben said this was postponed last year and put under review while the assets were inspected and he proposed the same was done this year. Last year that work was done by the Recs and Services Committee. Ian Stokes asked if the work could be broken down into sub-sections within the assets. Ben wondered if two months (up to July’s meeting) was long enough to carry out the reviews but it was agreed that the Clerk would coordinate the various reviews in time for July. Reviews of arrangements for insurance cover, staff subscriptions, the Council’s complaints procedures, and the Council’s freedom of information and data protection legislation brought no objections. The policy for dealing with the media should be combined with a policy for dealing with social media said Jane Varley and that was agreed. There were no amendments to the Council employment policies while the review of the Council’s expenditure incurred under section 137 of the local Government Act (which concerns donations to charity) should be looked at said Peter Geary, to make sure the Council is complying with it. The fi rst Monday of the month at 7pm is the agreed time for OTC meetings. Can that stay the same, asked Ben. Peter said 7.30pm used to be the normal time which was more convenient for those councillors who have a daytime job. Some councillors didn’t agree with this though, saying 7pm was more convenient, and it was agreed that the start time would remain the same. Approve the schedule of payments: This concerns the rates the council charges each year for buildings such as the Olney Centre and the East Street building. Ian Stokes wondered how there was a fi xed fee for electricity charges at these premises when the Council doesn’t know what the bill is, adding that the bill will have gone up by 60% over last year. Ben suggested that they adopt and approve the schedule of charges, notwithstanding a review that is going on concerning the East Street building, and this was agreed. The next point on the agenda was the AGAR (Annual Governing Accountability Return) which Ben said they could not do that evening but he could supply a timeline of what was happening. The end of year internal audit would happen mid-May, the end of year audit report would be signed off on 6th June (the next OTC meeting), when certifying of the accounts would also take place. There will be an extraordinary fi nance committee meeting before 6th June. The council needs bank signatories. Currently these are Ben Brown and Phil Geach, as former Mayor. For continuity, said Ben, they would need another signatory to take the place of Phil and that should be the Chair of Finance. But as Ben is currently the Chair of Finance it was agreed that another signatory would be required. Clerk Jane Brushwood was suggested, as was another member from the Finance Committee and, as the Clerk suggested, would it be sensible to have the new Deputy Mayor also listed as a signatory? This was agreed and Debbie Whitworth was added to the signatories list. CCTV quotes for the Recreation Ground and East Street car park: The Clerk said there were no quotes yet. But I can assure you, she added, my offi ce will get some.  Jane Varley said the Council had not determined what they were trying to achieve with CCTV. Do we want CCTV, she asked, and what will it achieve? Colin Rodden said they are trying to reduce anti-social behaviour at the Rec while Naomi added that it has become an on-going issue. Almost every evening there is vandalism at the Rec she added.  But what will CCTV prevent do you think, Jane continued to probe. Do we want to say we’ll have a monitoring service, she asked, adding that there is no electricity supply for the cameras and it hasn’t been budgeted for. Ian Stokes said he has some experience of this because of his involvement with the town’s Colts football club. They have involved the police and security fi rms in the past and, although CCTV fi lm is not enough to prosecute, the police say that CCTV was a deterrent to signifi cantly reduce crime. They also say a monitoring service is worth having because the police ‘just don’t come out to Olney’. He said crime had become more regular and ‘more aggressive’. We know security guards have been challenged with dogs for example, said Ian. There have been fi res in the stand and dugouts and they fi nd smashed glass regularly. If we do nothing it’s negligent, he added. If cameras can cover the car park, the access road and the rear of the Colts club it would be useful.  Jane said that’s a good start as ‘we need to know where the issues are occurring so we can decide where we want any cameras sited’. She said she would rather see personal patrols out there rather than relying on CCTV but it was pointed out that this would be even more expensive. Naomi said the Council has got to be proactive and sort this out. Let’s be seen to be doing something, she implored.  Ben suggested they go ahead and get quotes and Ian added that once the quotes were in, the Council should write its own specifi cation and then ask the security fi rms to re-quote against that spec. He added that any fi lming should be of good enough quality that perhaps can be used in court as evidence.  The Clerk said that without a plan in place she had made inquiries about security at the car park, the MUGA (Multi Use Games Area) and the access road. Start high and come down to what we can aff ord, she suggested. Colin asked if the Rec would put up some money too if the system was upgraded. Ian said there was a case for charging a fee for parking in the East Street car park during private events. It’s a revenue opportunity that we have not been using, he added. Naomi asked if the police would give recommendations on CCTV equipment but Clerk Jane said they wouldn’t. It was agreed that Jane would meet with security companies while Naomi off ered to talk to Crime Prevention Offi cers.
    Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 6th June at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Extraordinary meeting of OTC
    Mercury was unable to attend an extraordinary meeting of OTC held at the Olney Centre on 27th April, to discuss proposals for the Jubilee event. It was agreed that schools will participate in baking and painting, bunting would be left up for the summer, and additional bins were required. A Picnic in the Park event, beacon lighting, and the fl ying of flags used in the Christmas tree brackets, were all mentioned as ideas. Hanging baskets will be put up before the Jubilee week. Naomi Brock proposed that the same security fi rms be employed as last year, Friday evenings, Saturday and Sunday, starting at the Jubilee weekend until mid-September and that CCTV be investigated.


    Olney Town Council met for the Town Meeting, which is held once a year.
    Mayor Opens Meeting Recently elected Mayor Ben Brown welcomed the audience of 25 members of the public and councillors to the meeting, explaining that it would be very different to the meeting held last year online, due to Covid restrictions. Olney Development Group Report On behalf of the Olney Development Group (ODG) Chris Tennant gave the first committee report explaining that the role of the group was to monitor and review the implementation of the neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) responding to changes in national and Milton Keynes Council (MKC) policies, plus liaising with local businesses, schools, healthcare providers and others to enhance the social and community infrastructure and environment by use of the Section 106 funds received from developers. He gave a short update on the sites identified in the ONP (Olney Neighbourhood Plan) Lavendon Road (site A). A 50 house development is progressing well with occupation, including affordable homes underway.  Warrington Road (Olney Park, site B). New offices, warehouses and 66 bed care home is underway and OTC is currently liaising with MKC and the developers for a potential new Aldi supermarket.  Osier Way (site C), Construction of 66 houses and flats is underway with many occupied. Yardley Manor (sites D and E). Construction of 250 homes, including 75 affordable properties for rent or shared ownership of which 10% are allocated through the Local Connections policy. East St Community Centre or Youth Club (site H). Site H is earmarked for a new health and community hub and negotiations continue with the various partied involved, including Cobbs Garden Surgery. It appears that a decision has been made to refurbish the existing community building, rather than demolish it and build a new facility, as originally proposed. Site R is the Sainsbury’s site (now open) and the McCarthy and Stone retirement village, the latter of which is in contravention of the NDP, but for which the developers successfully appealed against planning refusal. Site S is Stilebrook Road Industrial area where three new warehouses have been completed and the rest of the site is safeguarded for employment use. The new council have commenced the five year review of the ONP to reflect changes of site allocation and planning policy. Finance Report Ben Brown presented the finance report, as Chair of Finance. He said the council had faced a difficult year with the income from the precept almost being wiped out and reserves having to be drawn upon very early on. Building a budget in normal times was difficult enough but almost impossible in the middle of a pandemic. The year had ended with a surplus of nearly £52,000, since income from bookings and markets returned quicker than anticipated. The council had made a number of grants including to the Rugby Club for new changing rooms, to the church for Amazing Grace 250 celebrations, and to Ousedale School for the 5G all-weather surface. Olney Centre Management, HR and Dickens of a Christmas Committees Reports Deirdre Bethune gave a combined report for the Olney Centre Management, HR, and Dickens of a Christmas Committees. The council had called upon former Deputy Clerk Jane Brushwood to help during this period and following a competitive recruitment process Jane had been appointed Town Clerk. The full report of this special meeting appears on our website [appears below]: www.phoneboxmagazine.com


    Olney Town Meeting - Full Report

    Olney Town Council meeting - Mercury
    Opening the Meeting: Recently elected Mayor Ben Brown welcomed the audience of 25 members of the public and councillors to the meeting, explaining that it would be very different to the meeting held last year online, due to Covid restrictions. Olney Development Group Report On behalf of the Olney Development Group (ODG) Chris Tennant gave the first committee report explaining that the role of the group was to monitor and review the implementation of the neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) responding to changes in national and Milton Keynes Council (MKC) policies, plus liaising with local businesses, schools, healthcare providers and others to enhance the social and community infrastructure and environment by use of the Section 106 funds received from developers. He gave a short update on the sites identified in the ONP. Lavendon Road (site A) 50 house development is progressing well with occupation, including affordable homes underway. Warrington Road (Olney Park, site B) for new offices, warehouses and 66 bed care home is underway and OTC is currently liaising with MKC and the developers for a potential new Aldi supermarket.  A member of the public later noted that despite the overwhelming public support for the building of Sainsbury’s, MKC had initially refused planning permission and hoped that the same would not occur for the proposed Aldi.  Chris responded that there is ‘latent demand’ for retail capacity and spend in the town, but there is a paradox in that the neither the outline planning permission granted by MKC for site B or the NDP allocate that site for retail, so although OTC supports the principle of more retail it could not support the plan in totality.  Mercury notes that the same developer who claimed there was insufficient support for additional retail on the Sainbury’s site, and successfully overruled the NDP and MKC planning refusal to build the new McCarthy and Stone residential homes at a public enquiry during Covid, now finds that there is sufficient demand to build an Aldi on the other side of the road. Money talks? You decide… Osier Way (site C), construction of 66 houses and flats is underway with many occupied.  Yardley Manor (sites D and E), construction of 250 homes, including 75 affordable properties for rent or shared ownership of which 10% are allocated through the Local Connections policy. This initiative was championed by former mayor Phil Geach. Regular meetings take place between OTC, MKC, the developers, and two local residents. The ODG continues to liaise with the developers on the design of the community building which they are obliged to deliver before the 125th dwelling is occupied early next year.  The site of the East St Community Centre or Youth Club (site H) is earmarked for a new health and community hub and negotiations continue with the various partied involved, including Cobbs Garden Surgery. It appears that a decision has been made to refurbish the existing community building, rather than demolish it and build a new facility, as originally proposed. Chris was later asked about the timeframe for this, as Cobbs Garden Surgery appears to be struggling to meet demand now and would not be able to cope with the demand generated by the new houses, particularly the retirement homes.  A long discussion took place and Chris said MKC has allocated £750K of Section 106 funding, appointed a Project Manager and agreed a land transfer deal in principle. It had always been recognised that the new developments would need to have social infrastructure improvements running in parallel but currently there is a time-lag.  A member of the public asked if Cobbs Garden Dental Practice would be relocating to the new hub, as suggested at a previous OTC meeting. Was it right that a private practice that does not accept HNS patients should reside in a publicly funded building? Chris said that OTC agreed, and the dental practice may be reconsidering its view on accepting NHS patients. Site R is the Sainsbury’s site (now open) and the McCarthy and Stone retirement village, the latter of which is in contravention of the NDP, but for which the developers successfully appealed against planning refusal.  Site S is Stilebrook Road Industrial area where three new warehouses have been completed and the rest of the site is safeguarded for employment use.  Five Year Review of the ONP The new council have commenced the five year review of the ONP to reflect changes of site allocation and planning policy. Other projects include the new full sized Astroturf pitch at Ousedale campus, replacement of the surface of the Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA) at the recreation ground, a skate park, repair and refurbishment of the former Football Club building (which will be subject to public consultation), regeneration of the Market Place, enhancement of OTC’s own buildings as part of drive to become carbon neutral by 2030, allotment enhancements, installation of new cycle stands, enhancements to East Street (Rugby Club) car park, and enhancements to play areas.  A question was asked if it is possible for OTC to have any influence over the carbon neutrality of new houses being built and the refurbishment of the East Street Community Centre. Chris answered that the current building work complies with existing building regulations, but new and more stringent standards will come into effect in June this year. However, the final decision on planning policy rests with MKC. As regards the East Street Community Centre, he said the building is ‘of it’s time’ and the best thing that OTC can do is to influence such things as the upgrade of the heating and insulation. He said OTC would push for the new community building at Yardley Manor to be built according to the new standards that will be in place when building commences, not when planning permission was granted as suggested by the developers. Finance Report Ben Brown presented the finance report, as Chair of Finance. He said the council had faced a difficult year with the income from the precept almost being wiped out and reserves having to be drawn upon very early on. Building a budget in normal times was difficult enough but almost impossible in the middle of a pandemic. However, the previous council had set a good budget which had steered the new council through a difficult period and this year the finance committee had been able to build on this good work.  The year had ended with a surplus of nearly £52k, since income from bookings and markets returned quicker than anticipated. The surplus had been added to the reserve funds which had enabled the council to exceed the target of reserves being 35% of expenditure two years ahead of expectations.  Ben said he understood that reserves can be a divisive subject, but his view is that reserves exist to protect the council’s future and the past two years had shown that they need to be prepared for unexpected events. He agreed that OTC need to be more dynamic with their reserves and ensure that they are fit for purpose and used when necessary.  The precept increase had been maintained below inflation at 3.4%. The council had made a number of grants including to the Rugby Club for new changing rooms, to the church for Amazing Grace 250 celebrations, and to Ousedale School for the 5G all-weather surface.  Ben was asked about the size of grants available and said that it varied from a few hundred to a few thousand pounds. The maximum is £10k but it is usually nearer £3k and application forms are available from the council office. He thanked all the OTC staff and particularly former Deputy Clerk Sarah for her attention to finance and the significant improvements noted in the recent audit. Olney Centre Management, HR and Dickens of a Christmas Committee Reports Deirdre Bethune gave a combined report for the Olney Centre Management, HR, and Dickens of a Christmas Committees. She said the new council had ‘lost the plot’ very early in its tenure which had created a great deal of work for former deputy clerk Sarah Kennedy who had been left on her own in the office as the council attempted to recover from the pandemic and had done an awesome job. Unfortunately, she had now moved on but has maintained contact and continues to provide assistance.  During the time that Sarah was acting clerk the council had employed Laura on a temporary basis, who was now a permanent member of staff. The council had called upon former Deputy Clerk Jane Brushwood to help during this period and following a competitive recruitment process Jane had been appointed Town Clerk.  The Olney Centre had been closed during Covid and the caretaking and cleaning contracts had not been renewed so staff and councillors came in to open up. Initially hirers had been reluctant to return but now things have picked up and a cleaner and caretaker had been appointed. A quieter Dickens had been organised last year. Planning Committee Report Trevor Aldred presented the Planning Committee report. MKC are the Planning Authority and OTC participate in the consultation process, having no actual powers. They can support, object, or pass no comment. Objections can only be justified on planning policy grounds such as non-compliance with the NDP.  The MKC planning portal exists to allow viewing of and commenting on planning applications, but it is not very user friendly so Trevor said he has prepared a user guide for anyone who wishes to use it. It is possible to email MKC so that a member of staff enters the comments on the portal, but he said there appeared to be little Quality Assurance of that process, so it is better for residents to enter comments themselves.  Social media comments were unlikely to influence decisions, he said. Of the 150 applications considered in the last year 20% were supported, 15% objected and the rest ‘no comment’.  Some applications which OTC have objected to have been overruled and supported by MKC but none of those supported have been objected to by MKC. The Planning Committee had assisted a resident in an Enforcement Order. [The full report is available below] ===============
    OLNEY TOWN COUNCIL  REPORT TO THE TOWN MEETING - 20th MAY 2022  FROM THE OTC PLANNING COMMITTEE  Summary of Activities for the Past Year 
    • INTRODUCTION and CONTEXT
    The OTC Planning Committee participates in the overall Consultation process, developed by MKC, relating to all Planning Applications received by them. As such, the OTC Committee’s role is primarily a consultative one – and it has no real decision making powers. However, it is allowed to Comment, Support or Object. Objections must be based on the relevant planning policies – i.e. objections must be made on the grounds that the particular Planning Application does not comply with those policies. Objections cannot be based on anything else: e.g. a Facebook posting: “I don’t like that development very much – it should have been a Harrods, not a Woolworths”. There is an online system, provided by MKC, for individuals to raise a comment or an appropriate objection to a particular application. Interested parties are encouraged to make their feelings known via this online system. (You can write or email MKC, and they will key your opinions in, on your behalf). A ‘crib-sheet’ is available on request to assist in this regard. Note: Social Media posting may influence the opinion of Planning Committee members – but they are unlikely to influence the decisions of MKC!  KEY ACTIVITIES IN THE PAST YEAR  During the year, the Committee has met once a month, and considered around 150 Planning Applications. This has involved reading / reviewing c. 1,000 technical papers, drawings and other documents, some of them very dense and written in a language that only approximates to sensible English! They have ranged from the very large (e.g. the Warrington Road development) – to the very small (replacing a house window). We have ‘Supported’ around 20% of these - and ‘Objected’ to approximately 15%. The remainder we have Commented / No Commented - (i.e. we do not wish to Object or Support).  Our main focus has been to try to protect and enhance our buildings estate and to preserve the amenity values of our residents - wherever we can.  There have been some cases where we have objected - but MKC have permitted the application. There have been no occasions when we have supported an application but MKC have declined the application.  In addition, we have assisted a member of the public requesting an ‘Enforcement Order’ – and have attended an MKC Development Panel, to better articulate an objection that we had made.  We have also worked alongside our colleagues on the Olney Development Group – in particular, monitoring the Warrington Road development, hosting a public participation event on the Aldi development, and developing an update to the Olney Neighbourhood Plan.  =============== Recreation and Services Committee Report The report from Recreation and Services Committee Chair Jane Varley was read by Ben Brown in Jane’s absence. The committee had commenced the year by approving the re-siting of the Amazing Grace 250 Community Orchard and approving the continued use of the allotment field as a wildflower meadow (additional sports use had been considered).  The market place toilets have been refurbished and trees around the market place renewed. Quotes are being reviewed for resurfacing the Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA) on the rec. Two speed guns have been purchased for the Speedwatch Group.  An open day is being planned to demonstrate what the public can do to reduce carbon waste later this year.  A question was asked as to why the planting of the Jubilee tree canopy had not received more publicity. Ben explained that the trees had arrived unexpectedly early and had to be planted in a hurry. Naomi Brock said there would be a public opening ceremony involving local school children and a commemorative plaque. Mayor's report In his Mayor’s report Ben Brown said since the last town meeting there had been an election many new faces appearing and two experienced councillors returning. He thanked the past Mayor Phill Geach and Deputy Naomi Brock for their hard work over the year, much of it unseen by the public. The new council had listened to concerns of residents, particularly on the matter of visitors to the recreation ground and security guards had been employed to enforce the rules already in place. The council will monitor the situation during the coming summer, he said. It was good to see town events such as DickensPancake RaceRiverfest and BOFF returning, and he looked forward to the forthcoming Jubilee celebrations.  He thanked all the councillors for their hard work over the year and said it had been a learning process for them all, but he believed that everyone who puts themselves forward does it for the right reasons. Ben said he was looking forward to his year as Mayor and was very proud to be able to represent the town. Thames Valley Police Report The Thames Valley Police report was read out by Ben Brown, firstly from the MKC Road Safety Office. Parishes are starting to sign up for local Speedwatch schemes and need volunteers. They are continuing to monitor the situation at the Whirlypit Roundabout, High Street pedestrian crossing and parking outside schools. The PCSO report for the last month identified 2 reports of unsocial behaviour (community), 1 criminal damage, 2 shoplifting, 2 theft, 1 burglary (business), 4 concerns for safety, 2 suspicious persons, 2 suspicious persons (vehicle), 1 RTA no injury, 1 RTA minor injury, 1 fraud. Ann Hopkins-Smith Charity Report Chris Tennant gave a report on behalf of the Ann Hopkins-Smith Charity, saying that the finances were in good shape, despite a heavy maintenance schedule for the Alms Houses in 2020. The welfare of the 12 residents is always of major concern to the trustees, particularly during the pandemic. Should a vacancy occur, eligible residents will be invited to apply to the trustees. Cowper and Newton Museum Report Paul Collins gave the report from trustees of the Cowper and Newton Museum, starting with a history of the museum for the benefit or new residents. The museum attracts over 5000 visitors from all over the world but was obviously impacted by the pandemic. The ‘Quackery and Enlightenment’ display, Dickens stall in the courtyard and spooky walks have proved popular and many maintenance and development projects have taken place or are underway. A number of heritage boards will be provided around the town. Three trustee vacancies and the two OTC nominated trustee positions remain unfilled. The Heritage Lottery grant for AG250 celebrations has been successful.  Newport Pagnell and Olney Lions Club Report Trevor Aldred presented the report from Newport Pagnell and Olney Lions Club. The club had run several successful fundraising events, including a Hoe DownMotoramaWhisky Tasting, and raised other funds through selling the town calendars and an easter egg raffle. Donations had been received from several sources, including Olney Classic Car Club and The Olney Group (TOG), the latter for assistance at their events. This had enabled them to donate around £10,000 to good causes locally, nationally, and internationally including Ukraine. [The full report is available below] and on their Facebook page.
    =============
    Newport Pagnell & Olney Lions Club (CIO)  Registered Charity Number 1184025  REPORT TO THE OTC TOWN MEETING - 20th MAY 2022 
    • REVIEW OF THE YEAR 
    SUMMARY  It’s been a difficult year again for the Club in terms of our low Membership – and this has been magnified by the effects of the Covid pandemic. But we have recruited a wonderful new Member, and we have had some fantastic support from new Friends – which is hugely encouraging.   With this re-charge of our energies and resources, we have ‘doubled-down’ and worked really hard. In these difficult times, we have tried even harder to bring our humanitarian aid to those in need. INDUCTION OF A NEW LION INTO OUR PRIDE and a COUPLE OF NEW FRIENDS!  Lion Angela actually joined us a little while ago. She brings enthusiasm, energy, bags of ideas and a real positivity. Angela is a real asset to our Club - and we are all delighted to have her on board. Also joining us recently are Friends Terry and Chris, who have hit the ground running, organising and participating in a number of our events. We welcome all three to the Club and hugely appreciate their fantastic contribution to our meetings and fund-raising activities.  FUND RAISING EVENTS  Hoe Down Event: We held our very first Hoe-Down Event. This went extremely well – despite it pouring down with rain all day! There were lots of smiley faces in attendance! I think we snatched victory from the jaws of defeat, despite the best attempts of the met office to throw a spanner in the works. There was a great community feel to the event, which I believe everyone enjoyed.  Motorama Car Show: We were delighted to announce the return of Motorama, to the Market Place in Olney, on Sunday 12th September 2021.This was the 25th year of running Motorama, having started back in 1996 on the Olney fields as part of Fiesta celebrations - and moving to the Market Place in 2008. Our proceeds from Motorama 2021 (around £1,500) were used to donate toCancer Research UK and The Princess Poppy Rainbow appeal – with, a little also going to our Charity Fund, which has been badly hit this year – with no money coming in, but requests for funds/grants still being supported.  Lions Toast Event: Our latest ‘Lions Toast’ whisky tasting event took place at the Carlton House Club. We were running the event to support DrugFAM, a charity that supports families, friends and relatives of those who are coping with someone with a drug, alcohol or gambling addiction. The speaker for the evening was Simon Coughlin, CEO of Remy Cointreau (Spirits Division) who gave us a true insider’s view of the whisky industry and the development of Bruichladdich (pronounced Brook-Laddie) distillery, one of the main employers in the Scottish Hebridean Island of Islay.  £1,000 was donated!  Town Calendars 2022: Again, we produced and sold two town calendars, in Olney and Newport Pagnell. I’m delighted to report that the profit of the whole campaign was around £4,300 – which is a fabulous result. Thank you so much to all who helped – the people of Newport Pagnell and Olney; the retailers of both towns, and our very generous sponsors!  Easter Egg Raffle: For various reasons, we didn’t feel that we could go for our full-blown Easter Egg Raffle event this year, so we came up with a slightly cut-down version of things. Our good Friend, Terry, made us up a beautiful Easter Chocolate Hamper - which we sold raffle tickets for, in Olney and Newport Pagnell. As a result of this event, another £500 will go local Lions Clubs in Ukraine and adjacent countries to help the Ukrainian people.  Sundry Donations Received: We received a number of donations during the year – in particular from the Olney Classic Car Club and The Olney Group – who presented us with a handsome cheque which was very gratefully received! A big ‘THANK YOU’ to all who have supported us.  SERVICE ACTIVITIES  We have conducted nearly 1,000 hours of community service, including:  Distribution of Christmas Parcels: We were delighted to re-introduce our Christmas parcels, after being forced to cancel last year. We purchased and distributed around 300 tins of yummy-ness to some of the local senior citizens in Olney, Newport Pagnell and surrounding villages. The whole Club, including some ‘retired’ members, pulled together to deliver the parcels, over the Christmas period.  Olney Fireworks: Again we helped out at the Olney Fireworks display - a really great show, well organised and very professional. Saw a lot (and I mean a lot) of happy faces! WELL DONE to The Olney Group for organising this fantastic event. Many thanks must go to our small army of Friends, who worked on the main gate with us - we couldn't do it without you - Great teamwork and fantastic spirit of friendship!  Amazing Grace Community Orchard Planting Event: Lions and Friends had a great day, helping out at the Amazing Grace orchard planting event, held in March. We: 
    • ran the reception desk for all the volunteers checking in
    • planted a few trees ourselves
    • sold a great many of our raffle tickets (and everyone loved the prize)
    • ‘flew our flag’ and engaged with our local community
    • collaborated with another local organisation - (Amazing Grace Community Orchard)
    • mingled with the Town Mayor and other OTC Councillors
    • had a great deal of 'fun and fellowship’
    • It was immensely satisfying to be a part of a really nice, worthwhile, community event!
    Tree Maintenance – Avenue of Oaks: In this period, a small team of Lions and Friends, led by our resident tree expert Martin Ward, did a bit of maintenance on our ten oak trees – mulching, and replacing the tree spirals that protect the base of the trees. We also carried out some work on our trees in Newport Pagnell. The young trees - well, saplings really - seem to be growing quite happily! - despite the recent windy weather.  DONATIONS  We have donated around £10,000 to charitable causes, including:  We made several designated donations to the Lions Club International Foundation (LCIF) – including responding to appeals for Haiti, European Floods, USA Tornado, Tonga Tsunami, Madagascar and Ukraine. In turn, LCIF has made considerable donations to global causes including around $1.4m in humanitarian aid to Ukraine. The Club also donated £800 to ‘Advantage Africa’ – (a locally based charity).  Our Club made a donation of £1,400 to the Milton Keynes Hospital Cancer Ward, Lions Family Room (As did several other local Clubs in our Zone). This room provides a private space for patients and their families in sometimes difficult times.   We also made a number of other donations – including Lifelites, Cancer Research, Kids Cancer Charity, South Central Ambulance Service Charity, MK Food Bank and The Woodland Trust.  GENERAL  During the year, the Club continued to work hard to build on the successful relationships it has with the local community, local businesses and with other organisations in the town – who the Club tries to help on a ‘you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours’ basis. For example, as noted above, the Club has assisted The Olney Group (TOG) at their fireworks event.  The Club has a regular feature in the Olney Phone Box magazine, that provides information about what we are doing in the current period – and we are grateful for that support. We also make a regular contribution to Turvey News.  The Club would like to sincerely thank the local community, shops, businesses, OTC Councillors and other organisations for their continued and extremely generous support for our activities – and with which we could not do without! In addition, the Club would like to make a special ‘thank you’ to the small army of Lions Friends, that also help us out when we are a little short of hands – throughout the year.  We urgently need new Members and Friends - (an easy, low commitment, way of helping support our work). If you can help, just fill in your details on our Contact Page, (on our website), or reach out to us on our Facebook page - and we’ll take it from there!  As previously noted above, the Club is always on the look-out for new members. We have some great ideas and bags of experience. But we urgently and desperately need extra help (Members and Friends) to boost our team if we are to take advantage of this. There is a real danger that we will be forced to scale back on some of our activities if we cannot secure more ‘hands-on-deck’. To contact the Club, you can visit our website or leave a comment/message on our Facebook page:   www.npolneylions.chessck.co.uk/  www.facebook.com/NPOLionsclub  Many thanks to all the members of our local communities, our shops, pubs, councillors, and other businesses and organisations – and especially, to our group of Friends for their support. We really could not do it without you!  Thank You ============== MKC Ward Councillors' Report The MKC Ward Councillors’ report was given by Keith McClean. Keith started by saying he wasn’t sure if he was now a City Councillor following the overnight news that MK had finally been granted City Status by The Queen. Keith noted that the No 21 bus service had been considerably reduced and the replacement MK Connect service was rather ‘Marmite’ – love or hate it.  The ward councillors continue to work with MK on improvements to safety at the Whirlypit roundabout and he noted that the Aspreys/Yardley Road roundabout had had the signage replaced and wondered how long it would last. He discussed progress on Yardley Manor, the proposed medical centre, and efforts to prevent traveller incursionsKeith forewarned that by this time next year residents with a single green recycling bin will have another three to go with it as MKC move away from the current bag/box policy to wheelybins. He said he had personally argued a year ago that all planning decision should allow space for the additional bins but that had not happened, and applicants were reluctant to do it retrospectively. This caused considerable discussion amongst those present, and it was pointed out terraced houses, particularly those in the High Street would not have space or access to store the extra bins. Keith said alternatives were being investigated elsewhere in MK but he did not know the result of those trials yet.  Debbie Whitworth noted that single bins degraded the visibility at the OneStop pedestrian crossing but another three per resident will be absolutely lethal and something needs to be done now before an accident occurs.  Chris Tennant asked if MKC had any plans to address the pressure that the MKEast development would place on the A509 and particularly Olney High Street over the 15 years of construction. Keith replied that MKC would be working with the developers to look at the routing of construction vehicles but the A509 is a trunk road and traffic restrictions would be difficult. Ideally, they would use the M1, he said. There are several imminent scheduled road closures, he said, and MKC were working with the developers to minimise delays and ensure that the duration of closures was limited to that which was strictly necessary to complete the work. He confirmed that there is no provision in the MKEast budget to finance a bypass around OlneyNaomi Brock asked that in the absence of a bypass could traffic calming schemes be considered and Keith undertook to raise the matter with the MKC Road Safety Office and head of highways to consider schemes similar to those introduced along the A428.  Chris Tennant asked about once proposed Rapid Transport System that would link Central MK with MKEast and on to Olney. Keith replied that the original plan for MK included a four armed monorail but the latest he had heard suggested it might be a driverless autonomous vehicle on the road but there were currently no funds for it.  Town Meeting Closed Ben Brown thanked everyone for attending and closed the meeting at 8:45pm.


    Olney Council report for June 2022 as printed in our July edition
    There were absences aplenty and one new arrival in this month’s sitting of Olney Town Council. The Mayor was away and the Deputy Mayor was unavailable following a busy Platinum Jubilee weekend.
    Town Clerk Jane Brushwood asked the gathering – which was quite depleted – if anyone would be happy to chair the meeting in Mayor Ben Brown’s absence. Deirdre Bethune stepped forward, a former mayor and therefore well qualified for the task. She took the chair at the head of the table and started by congratulating the Jubilee Committee for a job well done.
    Public Participation
    There is always a 15 minute Open Forum at the start of any OTC meeting: were there any members of the public wishing to speak, asked Deirdre. A deathly silence signified that there were not.
    Apologies for absence
    Moving on to business then, Deirdre asked if there were any apologies for absence. The half empty table in the Olney Centre told its own story: there were quite a few. The Clerk read through the list – Trevor Aldred, the aforementioned Ben Brown and Debbie Whitworth, Leanne Ward, Phil Geach and Debbie Hall were all absent. Mercury noted that Peter Geary wasn’t there either – he had presumably not sent his apologies. There were no declarations of interest from the table and Deirdre reminded everyone present that if they suddenly remembered they have an interest to make it known immediately. Item number 3 on the agenda was to approve the minutes of the OTC meeting of 9th May and the extraordinary meeting of 27th April. Ian Stokes had a query about a schedule of payments on the East Street building (the former football club) being approved from the May meeting. It says there’s a fixed fee on utilities, he pointed out, but that can’t be the case because it’s not a set amount, it had to be the actual bill that had been paid. That was noted by the Clerk. Colin Rodden brought up the statement read out by resident Kevin Viney at the May OTC meeting about the Veterans Lunch and the flags reported in Phonebox Magazine and the expenditure that had been paid out for those. But he shouldn’t have known what that expenditure was, queried Deirdre. No, said Jane Varley, fanning the flames of intrigue… someone’s been talking. The Clerk intervened and said that the minutes are only a summary of what was said and so they should move on. They did, and therefore the minutes for both meetings were approved.
    Co-option of one additional Councillor
    It was time to consider a new member for the council, to fill the seat vacated by the departed David Pibworth who resigned earlier this year. There were four applicants, reported the Chair: Frederick Parkinson, Mary Prosser, David Tyler and Zoe Westbourne. A tick box form was sent around the table from which Mary Prosser (pictured) was announced by the Clerk as ‘the winner’. She took her place at the table and immediately sat next to Jane Brushwood who offered to share her papers. Welcome to the team, said Deirdre. Mrs Prosser beamed delightedly.
    Mary Prosser
    On with business, the next item on the agenda was to review and approve the OTC Risk Management Register. Has anybody got any comments on it, asked the Chair. I have, said Colin Rodden. In fact, I’ve got quite a few so maybe I should send them to you. They were mainly comments and suggestions, he said. As it’s a work in progress document you can add to it as you go, said Jane Brushwood, adding: Are they additions? Yes a little bit, Colin replied, they are about accidents – if we have an accident book – and near-misses as well which you don’t mention in there. Near misses? asked an incredulous Naomi Brock. But isn’t that why we have a risk document in the first place? It’s all part of the reporting procedure said the Clerk and she was happy to accept Colin’s notes to add to it. Reports from Councillors who represent the council at external meetings was the next topic up for discussion. Has anyone been to anything other than the Jubilee meetings which are external anyway. It would just be the PLUG (Park Liaison Users Group) meeting, said Jane Brushwood. On receiving an expenditure report Deirdre said she should declare an interest because she had received some money. But that was only refunding, interjected the Clerk. I know it’s only refunding but I just think it should be declared in case anyone saw my name and thought ‘what’s that about?’. It was only a refund – it wasn’t for your benefit, the Clerk reinforced. Ian Stokes asked if they could see the expenditure figures listed cumulatively against budget. Can we see how each sub-heading is working against the budget?, he asked. I will find a way to do that, said the Clerk. The next item was concerning a review of the Council’s expenditure under a particular part (section 137) of the Local Government Act. It’s asking why we have reported as ‘nil’ expenditure under that section, explained the Clerk. It’s because we have to put it in there, you can’t put it anywhere else. That was the explanation I was given, she said, and it was an explanation that was accepted by all around the table. The Council then considered a £100 grant or donation to FOLIO (Friends of the Library in Olney) to help them provide Zoolab, an organisation that allows children to see and handle furry animals for £229. Is it a one-off visit, asked Naomi. Well, it’s an annual paid-for event, the Clerk cleared up. Has anyone got any objections, she asked. There were none. The Amazing Olney Heritage Trail was also discussed. Tom Jones, from the Olney Archaeological Society, had been in touch with Jane Varley about putting up new heritage trail signs around the town. We can’t say yes to putting up signs on pavements, for example, because they don’t belong to us, said the Clerk. We can only approve on places that belong to us. I have a problem with it, said Deirdre because we haven’t been told how many there are going to be or anything. I don’t want to be negative about the Heritage Trail but I would like to have some more information about how many signs are being planned. Colin Rodden said he thought it was only around five additional signs. It’s a tremendous thing, he added, and said that the organiser was only looking for the Council to show that they are positive about the idea so that he can then apply for funding. Jane Varley said she thought one is being planned for the Market Place bus stop and one at The Knoll landmark. But I don’t know where the rest of them are going, she added. Chris Tennant said he would be happy to support the idea, adding that the more we can say to help educate visitors to the town the better. It’s a good thing in principle, so let’s get some more detail he added. Naomi suggested they ask Tom to present to them at the next OTC meeting and check if there is any current signage that is out of date. So Chris summed it all up by proposing that the Council support the endeavour subject to the applicant coming to the OTC and giving a five minute update. If he’s unable to get into us he could send details, suggested Deirdre, otherwise could be stuck waiting for another month. It was all agreed. The next consideration was for the funding of an e-bike for Olney’s PCSO. The Clerk told the committee that the PCSO’s sergeant had rung her to say she was concerned about the idea, adding that there was more to this than just buying an electric cycle. There was the matter of looking after it, housing it safely, health and safety, training, insurance and other items that had not been budgeted for and were beyond this group. Why are we providing this to the police, questionned Jane Varley. To give it to the PCSO so that he can get quickly from one area of the town to another if he had to, said the Clerk. Naomi said he’s not just our PCSO though, he’s not here 100% of the time. In fact, she added after a moment’s thought, he’s not even here 50% of the time.  Ian Stokes asked how much this bike would cost. The taxpayers already pay for the police service, he added. He had further questions: Is it solely for use in Olney? I’ve never seen the PCSO on a pedal bike, let alone an e-bike – don’t we already pay for police vehicles? Is there really a benefit to the town?  Colin said he loved the idea of having a bike over a car. Ian said it was worth looking at if it was a real benefit to the town and proposed they come back with more details. He added, tongue in cheek, that they could put the officer on a normal bike for six months and if he looked after it they might consider an electric one.  That got a chuckle from the room, but Deirdre trumped him with the pun of the evening: Shall we just park it then? She meant the idea, not the bike. She went on to propose that the Council does not fund this e-bike and wait until they receive more information and a request from the police service rather than the PCSO himself before they reconsider it. That was agreed.
    Olney Bypass
    Deirdre said that MK Council has been asked about an Olney bypass and councillor Keith MacLean has gone to the planning policy manager at MK and asked about whether or not we are likely to get one. She said they don’t really need to comment at the moment but just be aware that this is happening. Chris Tennant said that the matter was sitting in the policy framework to which Deirdre said it’s been sitting there for 17 years. Colin Rodden asked if OTC needed to ask the town and its people whether they wanted a bypass and take that to MK. If there is a big surge of support, he said, they could go back to MK Council but at the moment we don’t know if Olneyites want a bypass or not, he added. Chris Tennant said the emissions data was falling so the argument for having a bypass also fell away. Is the counter-argument, such as is childhood asthma getting worse, enough to get a new bypass? We must continue to propose that safeguarded routes (within the Neighbourhood Plan) are  kept just that: safeguarded. He said this was a regional issue. To get to Milton Keynes from Wellingborough or Kettering for example you have to go through Olney. If lorry drivers want to get from Corby to the M1 that’s the way the satnav will take them. The MK East construction will go on for the next 20 years, he added with a hint of doom. And all the suppliers for that project are going to come through Olney. Is that the lever we can use to get the bypass, he asked.  Deirdre asked if there was anything else they can do at the moment. We have been positive said Chris, we have safeguarded the route. We need to discuss Weston Underwood too, said Colin, and Emberton. Ian Stokes asked if this matter already sits in ODG (Olney  Development Group) to which Chris replied yes. Ian said that Chris’s points about the MK East construction is hard hitting stuff and a game changer.  We have made active representations to make sure the bypass stays in the transport plan, said Chris. Deirdre suggested they go back to Milton Keynes Council with their thoughts and Chris said that he would do that as chair of ODG. Finally to the update on the council’s Annual Return. This needs to go to the Finance Committee said Jane Brushwood after which we will have a short extraordinary Full Council meeting. I need to go through it with the Mayor (who is also on the Finance Committee) and before it is sent to external auditors, and this needs to be done before 1st July. 
    Whirly Pit roundabout
    The long standing issue of the Whirly Pit roundabout was brought up again. The Clerk said that Debbie Whitworth had been ‘harassing’ ward councillors about the roundabout. Deirdre said there are pictures of how the roundabout might look and it’s all a question of whichever is this year’s safety fashion because there was a time when the council made sure things grew up on roundabouts so that drivers would have to be more careful when looking. Now they are taking vegetation away, she said, and then probably in three years’ time they will want to put it all back again. It’s about removing all the high level vegetation, she said, adding that she didn’t think OTC were even meant to comment on it at this stage. Well I think we need to comment to MK Council, said Naomi. I thought the discussion was about the danger coming down Drift Way but it seems to be about that coming from the other side of the road. Chris Tennant said this had a wider implication of taking a strimmer or chainsaw to the middle of every roundabout which he was happy to support if it improved visibility. However it doesn’t help with the safe crossing, which is still an issue, he added. And vehicles still approach that roundabout at speed, it’s still quite a way to cross that road and we should be doing a bit more lobbying to get a pedestrian crossing installed at that location. Colin Rodden said it was worth looking at more ideas, citing the roundabout in Milton Keynes near the main Tesco superstore where fences had been put up so that motorists physically had to slow down to look properly as they arrive. They need to look at speed indicator devices, while variable speed limits, 50 to 40 to 30, should be looked at for when you come into the town. People still think Drift Way is 40 limit, they think Aspreys is a 40 he said. We should get MK Highways with Thames Valley  Police together for a meeting to talk about a speed initiative. Naomi added that the council should go back to MK and tell them this roadway now does need to be completely reconsidered because it is exceptionally dangerous. There is no way to get across the junction from Osier Way. It probably needs to be a traffic lighted junction she added, saying let’s go back with all our arguments. Chris added that a four way traffic lighted junction would be expensive, but eminently safer. Deirdre wondered if they could ask for a smaller roundabout and Ian asked what were their chances of getting the junction changed. Slim to none at this moment in time, said the Clerk. Ian said we must keep plugging away for safer crossing and junctions, there are children crossing, families crossing – you can’t get across that road safely, he lamented. And if you have dogs with you it’s even worse. Colin agreed saying that we need to address not just this roundabout but the whole of Olney. Jane Brushwood asked for Councillors comments to be sent to her urgently.
    Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 4th July at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.

    July 4th 2022
    Public participation and letters to the council
    There were two members of the public present at the start of the meeting but neither of them indicated a wish to speak in the public participation section. Another entered after the meeting had started. At the end of the meeting he raised an issue regarding the eviction of an allotment holder. Mayor Ben Brown let him speak and then Town Clerk Jane Brushwood said the allotment holder had been into the office to speak to her and the matter had been resolved. Ben Brown said several letters had been submitted by members of the public, all thanking the council for the recent Armed Forces day. It had been pointed out that all attendees were over 70 years of age so Ben asked that if anyone knew of any service personnel in the town who wished to be added to a register they make them known so that they can be invited to future events. He thanked the councillors that attended and the office staff for making it a successful day.
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Apologies were received from Debbie Hall, Phil Geach, Dan Rowland, Chris Tennant, Keith McLean and David Hosking. The latter two are Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Ward Councillors who are now invited to Olney Town Council (OTC) meetings to present a report, along with Peter Geary who is also a Town Councillor. There were no declarations of interest at this stage.
    Ward Councillors report
    Peter Geary said that this was the first time there had been a ward councillor report to OTC for 14 years, although it was a regular agenda item for other local parish councils. Mercury recalled that this was a regular feature when Steve Clark and Graham Mabbutt (who sadly passed away recently) were Ward Councillors. Peter gave an update on the new footpath along Aspreys which is being constructed to provide connectivity to Yardley Manor. It had been noted that the existing lampposts are currently situated in the middle of the path, but he said new ones were on order and would be provided in the correct location and MKC would not adopt the path until the work was completed to their satisfaction. Naomi Brock said there had been much discussion about the path on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook group and asked if there was any cost to the Council. Peter replied that although it appeared that the work might be being done twice there was a certain logic to the order of the work, since the existing lights could not be switched off until the new ones were available and ready to be installed. There would be no cost to the council, he said, and admitted that he didn’t look at the Olney Noticeboard much as it was ‘too depressing’. He gave an update on the proposed new doctors surgery on the site of the old youth club (now East Street Community Centre). There had been something of a ‘log-jam’ with MKC regarding the purchase of the site over the last six months, which the ward councillors were working to clear. Colin Rodden asked if some timescales could be provided, since MP Ben Everitt had been chasing MKC but had not had a response. Peter replied that much of the information was commercially sensitive, but they hoped to be able to provide more information in the next six to eight weeks. MKE (East) will be an issue for the next 15 years said Peter. Work has started and the A509 road closure between J14 and the ‘Land Rover’ garage for two weeks from the end of July and will have an impact. It will then be closed for six months from the end of October to March 2023. The Holiday Inn will remain open and there will be access in either direction, but Moulsoe will effectively be cut off. With one of the main arterial routes into MK closed more traffic will go down the H3 past Newport Pagnell, causing significant congestion. Ward councillors were challenging the need for the duration of the closures but very little could be done, he said. Ian Stokes noted that this would have an impact on emergency vehicles getting to the hospital and Peter agreed.
    PCSO's report
    Town Clerk Jane Brushwood said no Police Community Support Officer (PCSO) report had been received, although a response had been received to a question raised last month as to why an incident of arson in the football pitch dugout was not included in the crime stats. She explained that the dugout did not qualify as a business premises so it would have been included elsewhere in the stats, although councillors said it would have been nice to know under which category. Ben said he and Jane had recently attended an informal meeting with the policing team and it was the same old story of lack of resources. The area north from Newport Pagnell is geographically 57% of Milton Keynes but is currently policed by one full time PC and three PCSOs. He emphasised the importance of reporting incidents to the police so that they could decide if a crime had been committed. The issue of antisocial behaviour on the recreation ground had been discussed, particularly the lack of police presence to issue fines for violation of the alcohol exclusion zone. The Chief Constable can give powers to private security firms to issue the fines, and this will be investigated. Peter Geary noted that in MK the Parks Trust have employed wardens to carry out this function and suggested that advice was sought from them as to how that was working and even the possibility of them coming out to Olney. Jane Brushwood said training could be given to locally appointed wardens to do this but felt that they should work in teams of no less than two. Ian Stokes asked if it would be possible to claw back funds (presumably from MKC), since Olney residents were paying the police (through the council tax) for a service they were not providing. Ben said they could ask but he was pretty sure what the answer would be.
    Expenditure report
    Ben said it was difficult to get an accurate picture of the council’s finances three or four months into the financial year, but a better picture would emerge in the next couple of months. Jane Varley asked if the costs of the Jubilee event had been covered by S106 contributions to which Deirdre Bethune replied that they had been more than covered. Trevor Aldred questioned the costs of IT and Jane Brushwood said that a revised quote had arrived that day on which she would be seeking Trevor’s advice.
    Reports from External Meetings
    Debbie Whitworth reported on the recent Parish Forum and North East Rural Community meetings, the highlights of which were: • Central Government support for bus services will cease in October and routes may see minor adjustments.  • MKC has produced a bus service improvement plan but did not receive any government funding. • The MK Connect service is growing and on the whole MKC consider that it is working well but residents are still advised to email or ring 01908 252526 with any issues or complaints. • Emberton residents have problems with the No. 21 bus service and are unable to use MK Connect.  • MKC will be demonstrating the new wheelie bin scheme later in the year and answering residents’ concerns.  • SABA parking enforcement attend Olney three times a week and in future will also visit the OTC office weekly for a list of parking ‘hotspots’ which they will then target. • There is no longer any central funding for Speed Indicating Devices (SIDs) and in future each parish will need to fund their own devices at a cost of £3000 to £6000 each.  The subject of SIDs caused considerable discussion. Thames Valley Police (TVP) will only consider deploying mobile speed monitoring cameras once six months’ worth of SID data has been provided to them and it was not clear to members what the criteria for further action would be. Naomi Brook thought that this was contrary to what TVP had previously advised. Peter Geary said the first point of collecting data was a local speed watch initiative with speed guns, then ‘truvelo strips’ which monitor traffic 24/7 for 2-3 weeks. His experience was that TVP would only then deploy mobile units if there was a likelihood of 15-16 offenders per hour. He noted that the closure of the A509 would lead to an increase in traffic along Aspreys and through Weston Underwood as motorists attempted to avoid the resulting congestion. Ian Stokes asked what the process was for getting average speed monitoring cameras installed. Peter Geary noted that along the Bedford to Northampton road there were such cameras in several places. There needs to be a request from the local authority and the police to kick the process off, he said, and while Bedford and Northampton police and councils were ‘on it’, Milton Keynes and TVP were not. It will be an agenda item for the next meeting. Deirdre Bethune reported on the recent Emberton Park Liaison User Group (PLUG). Consideration is being given to closing the two existing roadway gates to prevent cars driving all the way round, although exemption is likely to be given to fishermen. Park Manager Sam Flowers had received an award from MKC for his prompt action in saving the life of a heart attack victim and is a true asset to the park, she said.
    Section 106 allocations
    A list of headings for Section 106 proposals has been created in what appears to be an attempt to identify which committee is responsible for applying for each category of the overall pot of funds. Jane Brushwood felt that it should not be the responsibility of a single committee. It was agreed that each committee would consider proposals within their own remit and then bring them back to full council for ratification in order to avoid lengthy discussions at full council. Peter Geary said it was essential that OTC identified the priority areas to allocate this one-off sum of money which would not be repeated, since there was no appetite for further significant growth in the town. Trevor Aldred said it was important for residents to know how to apply for S106 funding and Peter agreed, saying that this was community money, not just OTC money. Most of it will be ‘hived off’ for services such as schools, universities, and health long before it ever reaches parish level, he said, so it is not actually a huge amount that will come to OTC.
    Committee membership review
    New member Mary Prosser has already joined the Finance Committee and will decide which others she wishes to join. A discussion took place about the term of reference of the various committees, as there was felt to be some overlap. Ben Brown said Phil Geach had written to say that he wished to be on all committees. Deirdre Bethune pointed out that the HR Committee had a limited membership so that other councillors could be consulted in the event of a dispute, although it appears this limit is not documented in Standing Orders. Peter Geary agreed, saying he thought it had been documented previously. Deirdre expressed her opinion that Phil Geach’s request should wait until he attended a meeting since he had not attended any since he stood down as mayor. A vote was taken with only three members voting in favour and one (Deirdre) against. Ben asked if there were any abstentions, which resulted in what appeared to be an embarrassed silence, and no one put their hand up, effectively abstaining to vote to abstain! Mercury was concerned that the fence might collapse with so many members sitting on it… Deirdre then said she would ‘decline to vote’ and expressed her dissatisfaction with the result. Ben said the vote had been taken and passed and Ian Stokes said assumptions had been made without knowing why Phil had been absent. Update: Phil Geach has subsequently resigned from the council. This means that two vacancies now exist, following the resignation of Leanne Ward. Most often vacancies are filled by co-option but 10 residents have written to the MKC Returning Officer requesting an election (at a cost of £7000 to the pubic purse) for Leanne’s vacancy, so Mercury assumes that this will only be required if more than two people put their name forward to fill both vacancies.
    The recreation ground
    A long discussion around the problems caused by visitors to the bathing steps on the recreation ground took place, a brief summary of which follows and not in chronological order: Ben Brown said there had already been one day where there had been a large number of visitors which had led to complaints about BBQs, consumption of alcohol, and traffic congestion including blocking of emergency access in the East Street car park. Naomi Brock said she had observed a PCSO’s vehicle blocking the emergency access. The problem will not go away, she said, and thought the council should look at how it could make money from the situation by charging for parking during the summer months, charging ice cream vans, and providing portaloos. She requested that white lines marking the parking bays should be repainted which would lead to more cars being able to park. Jane Varley felt that it was the responsibility of OTC to provide parking for visitors, for which it could charge to cover the costs of rubbish collection, security etc. and wondered if local businesses might like to make their car parks available. Debbie Whitworth suggested providing additional car parking on the football pitch for around 250 cars, as had recently happened for the Rugby 7s and Riverfest. There was no point in attracting more people until the parking issue was resolved, she said. Ian Stokes immediately declared an interest as Chairman of Olney Town Colts FC, saying that additional parking should be on an area designed for parking. Naomi Brock asked what the objection was to cars parking on the football pitch and Ian replied that the Colts rented the pitch from OTC and their season started in August so there was an overlap. There were also concerns around health and safety. Riverfest and Rugby 7s organisers had done a brilliant job in litter picking but who would remove every bottle top, which could cause horrendous injuries to players, he asked? Cars constantly driving over the pitch would damage the surface and it was a pitch, not a car park. There is an area between the pitch and East Street which had been used for the Rugby 7s parking and had room for around 30 cars, he said. Peter Geary said that MKC had previously approved plans to use that area for parking and had provided a grant for the mesh membrane, but it had not been popular with residents and had been dropped. Ian Stokes suggested it could be marshalled or locked and used for visiting sports teams in the event of charging being introduced to the rest of the car park. Peter Geary said the whole issue was a problem which had been discussed by the previous council in the first lock-down and could not be resolved in half an hour. A plan needed to be drawn up to decide whether to stop [the problem] or monetarise it and then consult with the public. Charging would bring problems of visiting sports teams having to pay to park, he said. Trevor Aldred said the council had no strategy on the issue, but Ben Brown said the solution to that is for members to bring proposals to the meeting for discussion. The discussion eventually moved on to the issue of antisocial behaviour and it was agreed that this was more of a problem in the evening after family groups had left, so the private security patrols will be increased. 
    Odds and Sods
    Jane Varley has updated and circulated the Standing Orders so the agenda item was deferred to the next meeting. Likewise, the Employment Policy and Procedures document will be reviewed at the forthcoming HR meeting and brought back to full council at the next meeting.  The Risk Register has been updated and individual actions will be identified and allocated to individual members.
    Exclusion of Public and Press
    Mercury had to leave for this section, but the council’s draft minutes reported: ‘An update on personnel matters: Rob Mungham has been appointed as Deputy Clerk. We were lucky enough to have several excellent applicants who we would be happy to work with, but Rob stood out and we’re looking forward to him starting 1st August.’ The next meeting will be held on Monday 1st August, at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Olney Council report for August 2022
    Public Participation
    There is always a 15 minute Open Forum at the start of any OTC meeting where the public can ask questions or make a comment. The Mayor opened proceedings by asking if anyone wished to speak. Up stood Damon Flynn, from Olney’s fishing club. He had been to the recent extraordinary meeting about the trouble down at the Rec and said the council had his admiration because he felt ‘everything was being thrown at them’. He added that his, and other people’s view, was that the recreation ground issues will only be sorted out by the police, through fines, car towing and similar action. But his main point was about the potential move to charge people to park at the Rec. I think that’s one of the worst decisions you could make, he said. There’s only a problem in that area for 15 or 16 days a year, he added, why start thinking about charging people to park there? The rest of the year would affect local people who never cause any problem there such as dog walkers and the sports clubs including his fishing association. The plan would not stop the people they don’t want parking there, he added. They will just go off and park somewhere else. The Mayor thanked him for his thoughts. Jan Oates stood up next and, as if to confirm Mr Flynn’s assertion about the council having everything thrown at them, fired off a litany of complaints. First, Long Lane’s drains are blocked with weeds so water won’t run away when it rains. Second, a leak in West Street has resulted in a pile of mud being left in the middle of the road – when would it be cleared up? Third, we don’t have any police presence anymore. Fourth, she had heard about Olney houses getting four bins each – was that really going to happen? Fifth, there is pavement widening going on in Long Lane – when is that going to be finished? Sixth, the pavements generally need clearing.  It was as if a Medieval caterpault had been released: the complaints came raining down on the beleagured council.  When the tirade finally ended, it was Peter Geary who popped his head above the parapet. The bins programme is definitely going ahead, he said. Well, only a small percentage of people want that, returned Mrs Oates, her anger barely concealed. Why don’t we have any say in it?  The bins issue is a borough council matter, explained Deirdre Bethune. Clerk Jane Brushwood attempted to douse the flames of discontent by asking for Mrs Oates’ email address. She said she would contact MK Council on her behalf. Mrs Oates wasn’t finished yet though. Will I get any response, she asked. We pay our council tax but don’t seem to have much of a say. Peter said the wheelie bin consultation had been going on for two or three years. Trials have been on-going and you either love it or hate it but it is happening so people need to get used to the idea. But what about people who live in flats, pressed Mrs Oates. There are other options for people in flats said Peter. As for the weeds issue he said, that’s got a place on the agenda all of its own later. Debbie Hall said that the bin system works well in the vast majority of councils in Britain including the Wirral, where she comes from. Not many areas have four bins to deal with though, pointed out Peter.
    Apologies for absence
    Ben asked if there were any apologies for absence. The Clerk said she had received them from Naomi Brock, Trevor Aldred, Dan Rowland, Colin Rodden, Chris Tennant and MK Ward councillor Keith MacLean. The table looked quite empty and, of course, Phil Geach and Leanne Ward had recently resigned, explaining two more of the empty seats. However new Deputy Clerk Rob Mungham boosted attendance by one. Ian Stokes suddenly intervened and asked, with an air of intrigue, if item 15 on the agenda, an update on the ‘Astro Project’, could be moved to ‘Confidential Matters’ as there was something he could not disclose publicly. Everybody’s ears pricked up at that. Ben agreed that he could. Next, the Mayor asked if there were any declarations of interest to be made. There were none. OK, does anyone have any comments about the minutes from the last OTC meeting? Silence. Right, I propose we approve those minutes – any objections to that, asked Ben. Nope.
    East Street Parking
    One item was moved up the agenda, and it had already been raised of course – the parking charges in East Street Car Park. Matt Croft from Napier Parking was there to offer a service to the council. Operating since 2006 Napier have worked in Olney before, on the Market Place. He said he would be happy to work with the council to help generate income from parking, being fully aware of the issues at the Rec. How long would the contract be, asked Ian Stokes. Napier would be happy to do a trial period but they would expect to agree a long-term relationship, said Mr Croft. Is it a standard ticket machine or ANPR, Ian probed. We have used ANPR before said Mr Croft, but we like to use standard machines, either coin operated or pay by card. The deal would include a uniformed presence for extra security – using ANPR relies solely on the technology. Additionally, Napier would offer a litter picking service for the car park too – although that wouldn’t include the whole of the Rec. That would be a lot of litter, agreed Ian.  What about people with exemptions, asked Debbie Hall. There is a management system which handles all that, said the Napier man. We can do discounted permits, residents permits, whatever the council needs. Do you take all the profit from this, pressed Debbie. No we take a percentage, 35%, of the income generated from the car park, said Mr Croft. But if we exempt sports club members, that means you might get very little income and might not make a profit to cover your costs for the year, said Deirdre, clearly relishing her new role as a harbinger of doom. We would have to discuss exemptions and if we made them available for a lot of people, you wouldn’t make a penny, she added. Mr Croft tried to ignore that bombshell and carried on manfully, explaining how clubs could pay a small annual fee and for that they would get parking permits to display at East Street. Peter Geary said that the council’s Recreation and Services committee would need to discuss this matter fully and then work up a business model to understand how much to charge for parking. But he added that at some point OTC would have to consult with people in the town as to what they would like to see. The people in favour of parking charges to help run the Rec and the people against the idea both have perfectly reasonable arguments, Peter added. Ben summed up proceedings: do we want to take this forward? Do we want Napier to come up with a proposal? The Mayor agreed that the matter should go to Recs and Services and Peter reiterated that the matter should be made known to local people adding that he didn’t think the idea would go down well in the town. Ian Stokes said the council had to address the wider issues of anti-social behaviour at the Rec. What is stopping us charging a day rate in that car park, he asked. Nothing said Deirdre. OK, so let’s not not consider it, he said. That spectacular double negative meant that he felt the plan was worth thinking about at least, as it could help combat the anti-social behaviour. The consultation is a longer-term and more robust thing, he said, but there’s nothing stopping us, on the occasional day, invoking parking fees there. Let’s not kick it two months down the line to the Recs and Services meeting who might or might not make a decision.  You’d be lucky if you get something from Recs and Services this summer, said Peter Geary grimly,  we’re looking at next summer now. If we’re willing to use the cash reserves that we have to pay for security and other things, without seeking to recoup any revenues from what is potentially a fee-charging car park, that’s fine, but we shouldn’t not consider it, said Ian. A second double negative – he was on a roll.  We also need to take into account the standard of parking there on busy days, said Jane Varley. People park badly, they are knocking people’s wing mirrors off, and essentially it’s dangerous. We’re overcrowded, people can’t get in and out, blocking the emergency exit so even if we’re saying this car park is full we need to do something about it. Napier sensed an opportunity here. We can repair and double yellow line that entry service road and we can mark the car park too, their spokesman offered. Temporary parking would mean temporary signs, is that possible, asked Debbie Hall. A nodding round the table suggested that it was. There were two proposals:  1. A short term one to address parking on problem days and charge a day or hour rate for parking and; 2. Investigate whether OTC proceeds with handing over supervision of East Street car park to a management company. Both were carried. Ben continued with the Rec issue by asking Ian to give an update on how volunteers might be able to help at the sports ground. Ian said there would have to be a risk assessment first, which Jane Varley was looking into, and then the plan is for a group of volunteers to get together on hot days with a view to preventing people bringing alcohol and  barbecues to the Rec. We are trying to address the anti-social behaviour, the barbecues, the booze and the drugs, said Ian. There have been threats and abuse down by the river when trying to move visitors on. Once people have been drinking for several hours, Ian said, that becomes a problem. The volunteer idea is to discourage visitors from bringing those things with them to the Rec. We would ask people very nicely and politely if they knew that barbecues were not permitted on the Rec, but we can’t enforce it. I suggest we have private security there at all times, and we have already put up posters discouraging alcohol, litter and (you guessed it) barbecues. They had not had a chance to properly trial the idea yet but Ian had politely spoken to three people and they had all put their barbecues back in their car. There is a request out for volunteers he said and he hoped that the passion that townsfolk had shown about the Rec would turn into volunteering. Peter Geary said they need to understand what is enforceable and what isn’t – alcohol use comes under a PSPO (Public Space Protection Order) for example, while barbecue usage comes under bylaws and he would like to know where that bylaw actually sits and what its wording means. The Clerk said she’d had a meeting with the Parks Trust who had given her some guidelines on policy but that the wording of that policy would take some time to get through so that they can understand what’s expected of them. Jane Varley said that as the various sports clubs will have things organised on the hot days, could the council contact JUG (Joint User Group) and find out where and when specifically those events were taking place and perhaps issue them some parking permits so that the council are not penalising them.  Ian Stokes said there were other places to park during the summer months, near to the tennis club for example or by the MUGA (Multi Use Games Area), so there are areas that OTC can provide without penalising anyone or diluting revenue that could come from the car park.
    CCTV
    Ben asked Ian to give an appraisal of how CCTV plans were progressing. Ian said that cameras will be going up on the Rec in early September. They are fixed cameras which will be recording for 30 days and in the event of an incident the data can be retrieved. All except one of the sports clubs has opted in to support the idea and the one that hasn’t is still awaiting a vote from their committee. He believed it would be a low cost solution for the council with possibly some grant funding. It benefits everyone, he said. A camera near the cricket club for example would be able to pan and zoom into the area near the river and will be good for data gathering while being a deterrent. All sports clubs have been informed that they will have to make a contribution towards the cost of the CCTV, the more that get involved the lower the cost for everyone. Ben said he hoped Olney people can see what the council are trying to do for them at the Rec. Jane said it’s important that when clubs are using the Rec field, someone is marshalling the entry gate and closing it behind them adding, ominously, that there were travellers in the area. It should be a condition of contract when using the field that people must shut the gate. That gate is really for emergency vehicles, council vehicles and access for maintenance, said Ian. Driving up to the football club is totally unnecessary and people shouldn’t be driving there as a matter of course. Ben said they would review who were the keyholders for the gate.
    Ward Councillors report
    MK Council’s David Hosking had been invited to speak, his first opportunity to do so. He talked first about the road closures between the Tickford roundabout and junction 14 of the M1 motorway reminding everyone that a number of closures will be in place until March next year as part of MK’s plan to build 5000 new houses and industrial units in that area. He said that they have been working with Highways officers to reduce the impact on road users over the coming months. Work will begin shortly on Olney’s Whirlypit Roundabout, including the roundabout itself and an installation of a traffic island on Warrington Road to improve pedestrian safety.  The issue of the new bins also came up in David’s presentation but most of what he said had already been covered earlier so he whizzed through that section. Ben asked if a decision had been made over whether petrol or diesel cars could park in this area’s designated electric vehicle bays and David said they could – there was currently not enforced EV parking only. Jane Varley brought up the issue of bins again. What happens if people don’t have enough space on their property to store four bins? Without access to the rear, some people would have to wheel the bins through their house and out of the front door. Boxes similar to what we already use and, in some cases, brown bags could be issued said David, with help from Peter Geary.
    Reports from external meetings
    The Clerk said she had attended an interesting talk by an ecologist which also discussed bio-diversity and flooding on footpaths in certain areas. Ben Brown said he had been to a launch event for the Amazing Grace AG250 celebrations at Olney’s museum. 
    Standing Orders
    Jane Varley has been working on this document with Deirdre Bethune and Trevor Aldred. There are not any major changes she said, but we have taken all the gender references out. No you haven’t, interjected Deirdre. Oh are there a few we have missed, Jane asked. Yes there were but the Clerk would put it right. The changes we have made are largely to the wording where it made no sense in the first place, said Jane Varley. Amendments had also been made to things that are out of date such as Covid regulations and we were also asked to limit the number of councillors that sit on each committee, said Jane. For Recs and Services for example we might as well have had a full council meeting as 13 of the 15 councillors were on this committee, and that is barmy. Peter suggested that they go through the document page by page and made detailed changes, too many to list here. These were all agreed by the council and Ben’s proposal to adopt the new document was carried. Jane was also responsible for the Employment Policy and Procedures document which had been reviewed by the HR committee. She proposed that they were accepted as read, and all were in favour.
    Section 106 allocations
    The Clerk said that the council is totally refurbishing the MUGA area at a cost of £79,000 and that all of that will be spent this year. Ian agreed and said that if the council move quickly now they can get the repairs done in 2022. The Clerk also had one quote in for the allotment drive which at £23,000, the council can afford to do with the funding available. No approval was made about the allotment quote as The Clerk is waiting to get three estimates. Ben said that the council continued to identify S106 pots of funding they can use and was pleased that the MUGA work could go ahead. Speed detection equipment for Olney roads were also discussed with potential funding from the CIF (Community Infrastructure Fund). There is no money in our budget for it, said the Clerk. If we wait until next year’s budget and put some money aside for it, we will then have to wait another year to apply for funding for the cameras (up to 50% of the cost), so it wouldn’t hurt to put in an application now, she added. What are we actually looking for, asked Peter. We’re not looking for speed cameras are we? No, we’re looking for SIDs (speed indicator devices), said The Clerk. So should we apply this year, asked Ben. This is one where you do apply and you also use your reserves and then rebuild that cost back into your budget for the following year if you feel you need to, explained Peter. So there’s no issue applying for grants even though you have spent the money, queried Ian. No you can’t do it if you have spent the money, said Peter. What you do is you apply for the grant now then you spend the money as soon as you get the grant, then you rebuild it into your budget. We need to decide how many SIDs we want, and where we want to put them. The council agreed to think about that and then put it to the Services Committee to decide where the equipment is going.  Weeds reared their ugly heads again. The Clerk said there were two departments responsible here: general waste and street cleaning personnel deal with the weeds on the road and pavement while the gutters are the Highways Department’s responsibility. Two different departments, two different problems, she said. The guttering people have a real problem getting access to the drains in the High Street, she added, as there are always parked cars there. There was a proposal that all the cars down one side of the High Street are removed and cleared out and the next day they do the other side. They have asked us how we can help them with that. They are looking at different ways of dealing with weeds in the gutters but they also asked if people could clear the weeds from outside their own houses. Ian brought up the plan by Anglian Water to flush through the town’s pipes. If we have blocked drains we are going to have standing water everywhere, he said. Should we tell Anglian about the problem with our drains?  A blocked drain should be reported through the proper channels, said Peter. Weeds in the gutter are a different issue and ever since the council stopped regularly clearing the gutters this has become a more regular problem. Scraping it all up is hugely labour intensive and there’s not a lot of spare cash for local authorities currently, he said. Highways are asking for help specifically to access the drains. If they want access then it means don’t park any cars on the west side of the High Street one day and the east side the next day.  If they want to do that, said the Mayor, then we could do a letter drop telling people. I think they need to put bollards around the drains rather than stopping parking and affecting trade in the town, said Deirdre. If the Highways department allocated two days for drain clearing should we help them, asked Ben. That’s great for people who live here, but what about visitors to the town, asked Ian. The proposal to do the letter drop and use cones to keep visitors’ cars away from drains was approved.
    Skatepark
    Ian Stokes was having a busy night. He now wanted to make a proposal that the council authorises the Clerk to agree the specification, costings and the location for a skatepark in the town with the budget limited by Section 106 funds available and community fundraising. Ian has already met with skatepark users and people who understand how to run them and was anxious to get things moving this time, rather than talking about it again and again. In other words, he was asking the council to get their skates on.  The location is difficult here, said Peter, and it will require planning permission so we would have to start consulting with people, because these things do cause problems. A park in Broughton was barricaded up and closed because people were driving 50 or 60 miles to use it and then there was anti-social behaviour there.  The reason why this discussion has been going on for seven years is because there was always one or two people on this council who did not want it, said Peter. It’s much easier to stop something than it is to get it moving and that’s what one or two people did at every opportunity, they would filibuster it and that’s why it kept getting kicked out. That’s what we’ve got to change, said Ian. We need to give the Clerk the authority to go forward and bring a proposal back to the council. Peter wanted to make sure the construction of any park gave them the lowest maintenance and running costs so they don’t end up with a large liability for it.  What are the costs involved here, asked Debbie Hall. Earls Barton is a benchmark, said Ian, and that was about £80,000. Let’s remember this isn’t about the preconception of 14 year old boys using this. It’s about families, parents, kids, all skating together, and people  using their bikes. We should be encouraging those things.  We need to provide something that is good for the residents of the town, not one that is the ‘best in the country’, said Peter. That’s what draws in enormous amounts of people into the town with all the anti-social behaviour that brings and we will end up firefighting another problem. All points were considered and Ian Stokes’ proposal was agreed. 
    Allotment Association
    The town’s Allotment Association has offered to take over the management of the allotments in Near Town. Debbie Whitworth thought there might be a GDPR data protection issue as the council still have legal ownership and that would need to be investigated. Ben said that notice would need to be given to every allotment holder and if they allowed the Association to take over the day to day management of the allotment the council would not divest itself of its responsibilities. Peter Geary said that he thought the council should offload as many responsibilities as they can, although the council could continue checking that areas such as health and safety were carried out properly. Considering how much the Allotment Association has achieved so far, said Debbie Hall, I think it’s worth giving them that opportunity to let them look after their own area. How long would any agreement be, asked Deirdre. They haven’t decided that but Peter said that there should be a break clause in any agreement just in case  things were not working out and the council could ‘take back’ the allotments if necessary. Ben summarised the plan: they were agreeing to the proposal subject to all the details being acceptable. Jane Varley, Debbie Whitworth and the council office were delegated to begin discussions to iron out those details. That was carried.
    Exclusion of public and press
    Mercury was asked to leave at this point along with any remaining members of the public because of the confidential nature of business to be conducted. 
    Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday, 5th September at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Extraordinary Meeting 26th July
    More than 100 members of the public attended this extraordinary meeting to discuss concerns about the recreation ground in Olney.
    Locals residents expressed their anger at what was happening at the Rec and their dismay that seemingly nothing was being done. The police can’t be relied on to get involved, one resident said. It was time to ‘take back our town’, said another. Witnesses had seen gangs of youths, drug dealers, people turning up in vans with pillows and quilts, gas canisters and alcohol. Someone’s car had been keyed, while another resident came across a group of about 20 people wandering around as if lost. Cars were parked badly on pavements so that children had to walk in the road, someone reported. There was a call for the Rec to be completely closed on certain days with a police presence to enforce this. Another resident suggested that a dossier of complaints is built up to be presented to the police for review.  One Olney person said that respectful visitors are welcome but others need to be dispersed by the police. Mayor Ben Brown said the three main areas of concern are anti-social behaviour, parking and litter. All of these can be monitored but that comes at a cost to the council and therefore residents.  It was proposed that until further talks with Thames Valley police have taken place security firms be employed to help with policing of the area. Volunteers are also being called upon to assist, although they will need training before they do anything. Residents were asked to continue monitoring the situation so that the police are aware of potential mass gatherings.
    Olney Town Meeting report for September 2022
    Public participation and letters to the council
    There were several members of the public wishing to speak at this month’s meeting, three of them on the same subject of the Johnsons Field play area development. For information, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) have submitted proposals to develop Johnsons field with tree planting and enhanced play equipment and this was a formal agenda item discussed later in the meeting. The first person to speak said the existing open layout of the field and play area was one of the things that attracted him to the area 24 years ago. He said he was delighted that Olney Town Council (OTC) were investing in facilities for young people to meet their needs. He pointed out that the existing zip wire and skate park had been in a poor state for a long time, due to lack of funds he assumed, and hoped that they would be fixed before investing in any new equipment. He hoped that funds would be put in place for the ongoing maintenance of the existing and any new equipment. He observed that placing any equipment or tarmac in the centre of the field would dissect the existing area which is well used for many formal and informal sporting activities, thus reducing the available space and flexibility. He welcomed the provision of new equipment but thought the obvious location would be around the outside of the field. The current open site lines across the field meant that children could play safely within clear view of their parents. Adding trees might create a ‘Parisian’ park type feel but the amazing view and spaciousness would be lost. Sadly, the trees might also create an environment for antisocial behaviour, including alcohol consumption, which would reduce the appeal as a play area to young children and parents. He asked that residents should be consulted about the plans and thought it was a case of ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ but please fix what’s broken. The next person spoke on the same subject and covered much of the same ground, saying that the plans seemed to show significant change to the character and layout of the field which the public were unaware of. She asked that the council should not make a decision at this meeting but delay until more detail was available, and residents had been consulted, particularly with regard to the extension to the paved football and basketball area, the amount and height of the additional tree planting, location of re-wilding area, seating and new signage.  The next person to speak said he had lived in the area for almost 30 years and the large open space had been a major factor in his moving there. The community make good use of the facilities as they are, he said, but agreed that the play equipment was in poor condition, with much vandalism over the years. The proposed path through the middle would dissect the field and lose much of its unique character. Bill Morgan then raised the matter of air quality in Olney. He said he was shocked to read in the Air Quality report for 2021 that the Air Quality Management Area for Olney declared in 2008 had been revoked. He thought this a travesty and the reason that MKC had given was that levels of Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) have fallen over the years. However, the most dangerous pollutant is particulate matter (PM2.5) which gets deep into the lungs and bloodstream and comes from exhaust fumes and brake pad dust. The only place that MKC measure PM2.5 is outside their own office in MK which is not representative. He urged that the council investigate further and consider placing their own monitoring equipment in the High Street. Ben Brown said he was unaware that the 2008 area had been revoked and would follow it up. James Cooper spoke about the application by Hutchinson 3G to place a 5G mast outside the Maya restaurant within the conservation area. He said he had spoken to a number of people who were not aware of the application and thought it ‘outrageous’ and an eyesore. It would be better located on the industrial estate, he suggested. Ben Brown said that OTC had formally objected to the application. Brian Pollock then spoke on the same subject, agreeing that it would be an eyesore. He listed what he said were a number of specific valid planning reasons for objecting, including key policy in the MK Local Plan. The Conservation Officer of MKC appeared to agree, having stated that it conflicts with policy in Plan:MK and the government’s National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). Brian said he was pleased to see that internally to MKC there was an officer prepared to say ‘Don’t let this happen’ and hoped the Planning Officer would heed this advice, but if he or she didn’t then OTC and he as an individual should go to MKC and state their case. 
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Apologies were received from Ian Stokes, Naomi Brock, Deirdre Bethune and Trevor Aldred. Chris Tennant declared a non-pecuniary interest in the agenda item regarding future use of the Football Club building as a member of Caveman Conditioning and Olney Town Colts FC. Ben Brown declared an interest in the phone mast proposal as he lives opposite the site, although it was not a formal agenda item.
    Ward Councillors report
    Peter Geary started by speaking about the previously mentioned phone mast application. This differed to most applications that come through OTC as it is actually a notification and objections must be raised within 56 days or it automatically goes through, he said. Objections must be made on specific planning grounds rather than objectors saying they just don’t like it. The government, backed by industry, have implemented the notification process to hasten the deployment of 5G infrastructure. The details of how this relates to ‘Higher Level’ conservation areas has been the subject of a consultation, the result of which is not clear however, so Peter has asked Ben Everitt MP to seek clarification from the Planning Minister. His concern is that resulting emerging policy could become statutory policy very shortly, overriding all previous policy such as MK Local Plan and NPPF. Even if the current plan was rejected this time round it could still be resubmitted if the policy was subsequently changed by the incoming Planning Minister. OTC and individuals have responded with quality planning objections, but more are required before the decision is made at the end of September. Peter said he was not opposed to 5G but thought there were better locations for the infrastructure, particularly as The Knoll is ‘almost sacrosanct’ to many residents and development there has been resisted in the past. Chris Tennant said that Hutchinson 3G had consulted with OTC prior to submitting the notification and had listed all the other sites they had considered. OTC had responded that any site within the town, particularly in the conservation area in a setting of listed buildings, would be considered inappropriate and it should be on the edge of the town. That recommendation had obviously fallen on deaf ears, and they had submitted the notification anyway. Debbie Hall asked who owned the land and Peter replied that it was MKC but that would not be an influencing factor in the decision as the annual rent would be in the region of £1000 per year. The second issue he reported on was the proposed new doctor’s surgery in East Street. The delegated MKC cabinet member would be making a decision on 3rd October as to whether the partners can purchase the site from MKC. If that was approved, then the next step would be to apply for planning permission. OTC should work to ensure that any money MKC make from the sale of the land are reinvested in the town, most likely on the existing building on the site, i.e. The East Street Community Centre.
    PCSO's report
    PCSO James Andrews was absent for the first part of this item as he was attending an incident, so Ben Brown read out the crime stats for the past month. There had been three reports of unsocial behaviour, two thefts, two criminal damage, three public order, three suspicious persons (two concerning a person and one concerning a vehicle), one road traffic collision. James joined the meeting later and reiterated that the only way he could justify asking his superiors for additional resources in Olney is if the public report all incidents and suspicious activity, which is not currently happening. It is important that people continue to report suspicious vehicles, he said, because burglaries by out of town ‘tourists’ are very often preceded by a scouting mission. He understood the issues that resident have with long waits on the 101 phone service but said that people should also use the online service https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/ as half the call handlers will be answering phone calls and half will be monitoring and reacting to online reports at any one time.
    Expenditure report
    Peter Geary noted that the monthly report had only been sent out earlier that day and, while some councillors may have had time to read it, other people present may not have done. He asked that should this happen in the future then the mayor should give a brief overview of anything that stands out and Ben agreed to do that. It was early in the financial year and a difficult economic climate, he said, but he appreciated the importance of the finance committee and full council monitoring spend, as the time to set the next budget was approaching.
    Section 106 allocations
    Town Clerk Jane Brushwood listed the projects currently being funded by S106. These included play areas, pre-school resurfacing, allotments, East Street car park, and replacement windows for the Olney Centre. Ben Brown explained that these were all improvements that OTC would normally fund but they were looking at allocating S106 funds from MKC. The Multi-Use Games area (MUGA) would be completely upgraded at the beginning of October and would comprise resurfacing, new fencing, and low energy floodlighting.
    Johnsons Field development
    Ben explained that Johnsons Field is owned by MKC who had sent the first draft of a proposed plan to OTC for comment. The Clerk said that Phil Snell, Project Manager - Landscape Services had visited the site and spoken to residents and had observed that there is a large volume of pedestrian traffic across the middle of the field, which was why the proposals included a made up footpath. The existing skate park area would be enhanced, and the play area replaced by gym equipment. A new play area is proposed in the centre of the field. Chris Tennant thought it important to engage with the community and agreed that the route across the middle to the Infant School is well used and becomes muddy in the winter. He said MKC had put forward a similar proposal a few years ago and he appreciated the attempts to increase biodiversity and to address the poor state of the existing equipment. Peter Geary suggested that Phil is thanked for the proposal and invited to give a presentation and discuss with residents. He suggested an article in Phonebox Magazine which would be paid for by MKC. Ben Brown proposed that OTC respond to MKC and will run a consultation with residents, which was passed unanimously.
    Additional project meetings
    There are several projects taking place in the Olney Centre, particularly the Pre-School area, which require regular and rapid decisions to be made. As the management committee only meets four times a year the Clerk suggested a smaller sub-group could be formed to meet on an ad-hoc basis as and when required. Peter Geary said the council was elected on being open and while meetings of the OC Management Committee are open to the public the same could not be said of ad-hoc meetings. Ben Brown proposed that the OC Management Committee are asked to meet more regularly, which was agreed.
    Splitting of Recs and Services Comittee
    At a previous meeting Ian Stokes had proposed splitting this very large committee into two separate ones, as follows. Environment & Community Services would cover Environmental Impact, Climate Emergency, Cemetery & Church, Defibrillators, Dog Bins, litter and grit bins, Events supported by OTC, Markets, Maintenance & management of OTC buildings except TOC, Parking, Public Toilets, Speeding, Wildlife sites, Barnfield, Goosey, Glebe Field. Sports and Recreation would cover Allotments, Joint Users Group, Landscape except wildlife sites, Landscape Machinery, MUGA, Parks & Recreation, Play Areas, Schools Liaison. Ben Brown said the existing Recs & Services committee had very narrowly voted in favour of the proposal by one vote and it had now come to full council for ratification. He said he was nervous about proceeding with the split but noted that in its present form it had become unproductive because of the sheer volume of matters it had to deal with. Peter Geary said whatever decision was taken should be reviewed next May. After much discussion a vote was taken and the proposal rejected by five to two with two abstentions.
    The recreation ground
    Ben Brown reported that the volunteer scheme had been a success, whereby volunteers stood by the entrances reminding visitors that alcohol and BBQs were not allowed. The Clerk reported that the lines in the car park had been repainted and CCTV installation would start the next day. The regular private security patrols will be suspended as visitor numbers have decreased and the allocated budget almost spent. Peter Geary said the council needed to assess whether the security patrols had made that much difference and build into next years budget, as there still appeared to have been lots of issues and litter still being left. Jane said since the various measures had been introduced the litter had reduced. Deputy Clerk Rob Mungham reported that there was now a team of 20 volunteers, mostly from the community and not council members or employees and they would be having a ‘mop up’ meeting in October. Ben proposed that the private security patrols be suspended forthwith (unless there was a peak in visitors before the end of September) which was agreed.
    Flag flying policy
    This item caused much debate and frayed tempers. Ben Brown reported that over the last few months there had been several emails into the office regarding the flying of flags for events such as the Jubilee and in support of Ukraine. Newport Pagnell has a very good policy for flag flying whereby the council staff know exactly when various flags should be flown, he noted. An outline model document was presented to members which Ben said he would like to consult with various people on and bring back to the next meeting. Debbie Hall asked why it was necessary to have a policy and thought it ‘over the top’. She thought it had been precipitated by complaints about flying of the Ukrainian Flag (Mercury noted that there had also been comments on social media and a question asked at a previous meeting under public participation). Although Ben said this was not the case, she said she thought it too much of a coincidence. Debbie Whitworth said that High Street residents flying the Ukrainian flag had had them removed with no warning or explanation. Debbie Hall noted that this [the Ukrainian flag in the marketplace] had been taken down the day before Ukrainian Independence Day. Ben replied that it had been done after consultation with the Royal British Legion regarding the Jubilee, with no malicious intent and was precisely why a policy was required. This had been a mistake. Peter Geary said comments had been made that if the Ukrainian (or any other nation’s) flag was flying above the war memorial then the Union flag should be flying as well, which was perfectly reasonable. David Tyler said that when the Queen eventually dies there is a strict protocol which will need to be followed – prophetic words, in the event.
    Odds and Sods
    The Remembrance Sunday parade will take place on 13th November. It is ‘owned’ by OTC but organised by The Royal British Legion. The parade will probably commence from just outside of the Market Place, rather than the church as in previous years. In response to a question about stopping the traffic, Peter Geary replied that there should be a police officer present who is empowered to stop passing traffic for the duration of the minute’s silence. Permission was granted for The Olney Group (TOG) to hold the annual fireworks event on the recreation ground on Sunday November 6th. Out Of Office has applied for an alcohol licence and OTC have no objections.
    Committee membership review
    New member Ron Hall expressed a wish to join Dickens of a Christmas and David Tyler Planning. They will attend meetings of other committees before deciding which others to join. Deirdre Bethune and Debbie Whitworth will join the Finance Committee.
    Consultation on future use of the former Football Club building
    A draft public survey document was presented, the introduction of which read: “The East Street building is in a serious state of disrepair. It is yet to be decided whether to repair and restore or knock it down and start again. Any grant funding that is be available, will depend on the future use of the building, so Olney Town Council needs to determine what residents would like to see there.” Much discussion took place and members agreed that more information and detail would be required for the public to make informed comments. Colin Rodden observed that whatever decision was made would entail considerable expense, even with available grants, and at least there was current income from rent from the current tenant. Ben proposed that OTC obtained advice from a survey expert and Peter Geary agreed, saying it was important for the public to realise that it would be a consultation and not a binding referendum where the council would be obliged to implement the most popular suggestion. Whatever was decided it was essential to have flexibility for other uses in the future. It would be a huge project and a suggested figure of £120,000 was a fraction of what would actually be required, he thought. 
    Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 3rd October, at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Olney Council report for October 2022 as in the November edition
    They were talking rubbish again at Olney Town Council’s monthly gathering. The incendiary subject of wheelie bins was always going to roll up at some point in the evening. And, just like the pong that lingers in the air after the bin men have been round, it’s a topic that refuses to go away.
    Apologies for absence
    It was a busy night in the council chambers with only Deirdre Bethune sending apologies so the meeting table was pretty full. Councillors tend to head for their ‘usual’ place each month but that wasn’t an option for new boys Ron Hall and David Tyler. Ron squeezed into a slot halfway down the right hand side while David found himself at the far end among the grandees of Peter Geary, Chris Tennant and Ian Stokes. As no members of the public wished to speak, business could get straight on. Were there any declarations of interest, asked Mayor Ben Brown. Item 14 (Yardley Manor Community Building) brought two responses: Chris Tennant said he was a neighbour to that development while Trevor Aldred said he had a vested interest in another community building (the one in East Street). The Mayor moved on to item 3 on the agenda (Approving the minutes of the previous OTC Meeting) when Colin Rodden suddenly piped up with a declaration of interest query from that past gathering’s minutes: the Royal British Legion was mentioned and I’m a card carrying member, he said. Nobody quite knew what to do with that earth-shatterer, but Ben nodded graciously and then attempted to get the minutes approved. They duly were.
    PCSO's report
    The Mayor then moved item 5, the report from local police community support officer James Andrews up the agenda just in case James ‘gets called away suddenly’. He needn’t have worried: as the uniformed officer was about the tell us, he rarely gets called to anything. According to his latest stats in the last six months he has only had 11 calls for ASB (anti-social behaviour) which were mainly children seen smoking down at the Rec. Hardly the Brink’s-Mat heist.  There was some discrepancy between these figures and those shown on the official police website because of the different definitions used for crimes or alleged assaults, but James was confident his were correct. The PCSO was thankful to the Council for setting up a tent on the Market Place recently where residents could go and report things they were unhappy with, such as ‘kids messing about on Johnson’s Field’, or ‘someone has parked across my driveway’. James needs all these reports for his stats – without them he said, he couldn’t respond and he therefore ‘didn’t have a leg to stand on’. So the message from the officer was ‘report stuff’ through the official channels. He added that some residents were surprised when James actually contacted them but he added he was happy to do just that as he had ‘time on my hands’. Debbie Whitworth asked what notice James can give that he is going to be at the Market Place, because many residents and traders there had told her they didn’t know the police were going and if they had known they would have been ready for him. Not much, was the PCSO’s reply. Colin Rodden asked, on that subject, if Olney could have a regular police visit to the Market Place so that the community could keep in touch and share ‘Intel’ to give him information. That’s fine said James but he added that he still wants people to call in with their issues because he needs to get his stat numbers up. I need names, he said, I need details, and then, with a touch of The Sweeney about him, he added, I need you to say: ‘I’ve got a victim’. Some people tell me about an issue that they’ve kept to themselves for nine or 10 days, James said. And, with his frustration just noticeable, he added: so why didn’t they tell me earlier?
    Ward Councillor's report
    Peter Geary started with some good news – the 5G mast destined for Olney’s High Street has been refused. He wasn’t really surprised, the plans put the mast right in the middle of a conservation area. However, he added, it’s not the end of the planning process as there is a right of appeal and also some changes to planning policy coming that will make it easier for developers to build them. So who knows what’s going to happen in the future?, he asked. Peter reported last month about the new medical centre and added this time that there were now opportunities to find out about plans and ask questions about this very important issue.  The MKE project, which closed the A509 in the summer between Newport Pagnell and the M1 motorway for water services, was due to be closed for another six months. But he said those plans had been delayed now for at least six months because Milton Keynes Council have undertaken to deliver a bridge over the motorway and other engineering works but have discovered they can’t afford them now. A bridge too far? MKC are currently looking at ways to make the projects cheaper. The road closure is now expected next March, he said, adding, with the look of a man who has heard it all before, that it could well be ‘some time after that’. The other issue to discuss said Peter is wheelie bins. They’re a subject everyone is all too aware of as they are brought up in most parish council meetings that he goes to. The wheelie bins, said Peter without a hint of irony, are ‘rolling out’. The decision for them to come to Olney has been made and there is no turning back from that he added. Some people love it, some people hate it, he added, but the decision was made years ago (so it’s not going to be thrown out). The thing to do now is to understand which properties the scheme really is unsuitable for because collections start in less than a year’s time and it’s important to get those properties identified because it will otherwise be ‘a real mess’ at the start of the contract. Getting anything changed after it has started will be very difficult, he warned, so when council inspectors come round to finalise details it’s important that in the coming months people who can’t get their bins behind their properties are given another option. Jane Varley wondered if the consultation would take place during the day when people are out at work and not available to take part. The last part of the consultation now is understanding which areas are going to be problematic and which aren’t, said Peter. The High Street in Olney is potentially a problem, he warned, but a lot of it can be resolved if everyone works around it. 
    Expenditure report and budget to date
    Everyone had been sent the expenditure report already as requested, said the Mayor. It takes them up to September which is about the halfway point in the financial year, and they could start to look at some projections he said. For example, said the Mayor, we are under where we would expect to be on cemetery income. I won’t dwell too long on that one said Ben, with a hint of the Grim Reaper, we’re expecting it to pick up towards the end of the year. That was a bold forecast to say the least. Ben also noted that even though the cemetery has had fewer new residents recently, it meant that expenditure was down too. The Market Place had more good news – it was over by 50% of their forecasted budget which demonstrates that trade generally there was good, with the projected number of traders in and they were getting reasonable feedback from them that the market was going well. The Olney Centre too brought good cheer – income from that was slightly up. Were fees paid in advance for users of the Centre, Ben asked the Clerk Jane Brushwood. They should be, but they haven’t been, came the rather cryptic reply. We are trying to get all fees paid in advance in accordance with the rules and regulations the Clerk added and it’s gradually getting up to where it should be. The Centre has hosted a lot of good groups and a variety of interests so that’s good news, Ben said.  Total income was at 96% of where they expected to be which included preset money upfront – the bulk of their income. Specifically on expenditure, there were questions to be answered particularly about what has been spent on the Rec. Security, for example, was budgeted at £6,000 but the council had already spent £13,126 – more than double the budget, said Ben. Repair and maintenance were also over budget, there were additional costs of £1,417 on extra bins, and CCTV had cost £1,000. Some of the Rec money will be recouped from participating sports clubs, said Ben so overall on total expenditure, they were at 50% of what they budgeted and are looking at a surplus at the end of this year. Overall we are in a healthy space, said the Mayor, with the exception of the Rec, where we have massively overspent but we committed to the community that we would do many things there and we will get a final costing for it and look at further measures for next year. Peter Geary asked about how some expenditures were accounted for citing, for example, the cost of CCTV down at the Rec which is a capital expenditure and should not fall into the Revenue budget line. Ben wasn’t even sure the cost had been billed yet and the Clerk confirmed his fears – they haven’t had the final bill she said. Despite that, the Mayor reiterated the council’s budgetary situation. Without wanting to tempt fate, said Ben tempting fate, we’re in a pretty good position.
    Councillors who represent at external meetings
    Councillors had been busy last month turning up at meetings on behalf of the Council. Trevor Aldred said he had attended a Cowper & Newton Museum trustees meeting which he said was compromised a little because not all the trustees were there. Not that I know who all the trustees are of course, he added. There was an update on collections and new display cases and Trevor reported that the man who tends the vegetable gardens is retiring, the paths from the flower garden to the summer house need repairing and there was an update on the AG250 Amazing Grace campaign and a finance report with a discussion about increasing admission charges. Mary Prosser reported on a meeting with LCWIP (Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan) about a red route from the Industrial Estate down to Driftway. There is space for a route in that area, said Mary, but not once you get down to West Street and in other parts of the town where there is no opportunity to introduce the scheme due to current parking, pedestrian crossings and other safety issues. The proposal, said Mary, is in an embryonic state and is likely to take at least five years for it to go much further.  Debbie Hall attended the Olney-Newton Link meeting about the Sierra Leone charity. Discussions centred around how the money raised was being spent in Newton, Sierra Leone. The Mayor had also been busy with external meetings – he attended the Proclamation in Olney’s Market Place, to officially announce the new King. And, from one form of pageantry to another, Ben was at the Justice Service hosted by Buckinghamshire’s High Sheriff. This one had been a long time coming to Olney – 1000 years in fact – and Ben was delighted to have been involved as he welcomed several mayors from around Buckinghamshire to the Cowper & Newton Museum. He also went to a coffee morning at the Carlton House club in aid of Macmillan Cancer Support with Deputy Mayor Debbie Whitworth, who helped with the organisation. More than 100 people attended, said Ben and over £1000 was raised for this good cause.
    Section 106 spending
    The Clerk reported that the tennis club have managed get their lighting completed. Works at the MUGA (Multi Use Games Area) are well underway. New lighting for the MUGA and for CCTV is being set up and will be done for November when the electrician will use a cherry picker to link in Christmas tree lights too. Although if the CCTV was linked to the posts that have the MUGA lighting it would only work when the lights were turned on, or as the Clerk brilliantly put it ‘when you put a coin in the meter’. She meant this literally: the MUGA lights are token operated and stay on for one hour at a time. Talking of coinage, there are quotes now for resurfacing at the allotment which will be discussed and agreed by the Recs and Services committee and plans for the Olney Centre have also been received. They include a package of measures including the pre-school mezzanine, door widening, double glazing and solar heating. Things are happening she said encouragingly. The Clerk is waiting for details from Milton Keynes Council on proposals for the Johnson’s Field play area before the next OTC meeting in November. Ben Brown said he was pleased that the council were accessing S106 money for good use. The MUGA for example with its upgrade, is now attracting bookings where in the past it had been neglected. Colin Rodden asked if there was any more news about the proposed skate park. Yes, that’s tied in with the Johnson’s Field work said the Clerk. 
    Updates on the Rec
    The Mayor asked Ian Stokes to give a quick update on the CCTV situation if he had one. Ian said he didn’t – not an official one anyway – but he was able to give a brief summary from memory. With grants and contributions from the sports clubs benefiting from the new cameras, the project is ‘cost neutral’ to the council he reported. The deterrent is there, he said, as is evidence gathering which allows the council to use images to prosecute wrong-doers. Ian said that next year they should look at using portable cameras that can be moved around because if you put fixed CCTV on the Rec you simply move vandalism problems somewhere else. Trials continue and some CCTV images that Ian had seen were good quality and he was interested to see if they could act on some of the vandalism they have had down at the football club recently. This should not be a passive thing said Ian, getting tough. Whether we can pick up the CCTV images and publish them or get the police to take action we’ll have to see. Yes, the Mayor agreed, and it’s worth announcing to the town that the images we have are good quality. Colin Rodden said vandalism was regrettable but we must be careful that we don’t have trial by media, he added. We need to get images to the police and let them do their job. The only access to the images is through the council offices, said Ian, so it’s very tightly controlled. PCSO James suggested the council gets a CCTV book so that when he comes to collect any images he can sign for them. This indication of the police getting on board with the cameras idea went down well and was agreed. On a separate matter Naomi Brock said that litter is still a problem on the Rec and they needed to retain litter picker volunteers if possible.
    Citizens Advice in Olney
    Debbie Whitworth said she had been in touch with Ben Thomas, the director of Citizens Advice MK (they have dropped the word ‘Bureau’ from the title) who said he would be agreeable to bringing back the outreach service to Olney and specifically the Olney Centre. With Autumn approaching, said Debbie there are many residents who will be facing challenges. There are pockets of depravation in Olney which will be hit hard in the winter months and having access to the CA in the Olney Centre will make a real difference to their lives. Debbie proposed that they invite Ben Thomas to the council offices to discuss the CA’s return to the town. We’ve had Citizens Advice before so I don’t know why they disappeared the last time, said Debbie Hall. There was a 12 month contract before, said Jane Varley Varley, but I think they would be prepared to get a trial down to six months. The Mayor understood that previously there were not enough people using the service and the cost of the sessions was getting too high per person. However, he said he realised that in the current circumstances that might well have changed. It’s a great service, said Jane Varley. It’s a ‘nice to have’. But unless we’re seeing a massive benefit for CA to come out to people and it’s proving cost effective, residents might well want us not to overspend on our budget. Peter Geary was in favour of the plan. People from Olney used to have to go to central Milton Keynes to see the CA, he said. There was no booking service, you had to sit and wait your turn, sometimes for two or three hours. Some people had to get their bus back to Olney and never got a chance to see the CA. It was a big problem. He said he would support a six month trial at least, to see what the demand was like. We need a letter saying what it will cost, how many sessions we get for that, and what issues we are dealing with. Let’s start soon, it will give us a chance to understand whether we want to continue or not. Let’s kick it off as soon as possible agreed Ian Stokes, it’s going to be a tough winter. So how much will it cost, asked Peter. It’s around about the £2000 mark, said Debbie Whitworth. Is that every two weeks and for a full day?, pressed Peter. Well I don’t know the details of that, said Debbie, clearly realising she would have to get some advice of her own. There is some demand said Naomi, who runs the Olney is Kind community project, but I’m not sure someone coming and sitting in here is going to make much more difference than you or I sitting here. Most information can be found on-line she said, her far-from-high opinion of the agency gradually revealing itself. She wanted to know what service was being offered, but added she was still happy to give it a try. It was proposed that Ben Thomas visits the council and this was carried by a majority.
    Other items
    Late night opening dates in Olney have been set at 24th November, to coincide with the festive lights being switched on, and 8th December. A volunteer policy needed to be agreed and insurance for volunteers confirmed. Colin Rodden asked if a risk assessment had to be carried out first. That’s done for everything we do, said the Clerk.
    Community fridge
    The Clerk said there had been lots of talk about this service but she had been doing several grant applications which are not coming in quickly enough. I would like approval to spend the money needed beforehand and get the funds later, she said. It’s going to be needed more and more as we go into the hard times ahead. Jane Varley asked if the Co-op had been asked because she understood that they were anxious to put money into this project. Peter Geary was fearful that the vast majority of grants he had come across don’t allow retrospective applications so he thought a check was needed on the financial implications if the applications were rejected. A shed is proposed outside the Olney Centre with a fridge inside and some shelves and people literally just help themselves, explained the Clerk. This is not just for people who can’t afford food, it’s also for stopping waste. Costs would roughly be: shed £2000, fridge £1500, table, solar panels, electric supply, troughs outside for a herb garden, signage. That’s a total of about £4,700, she added. The proposal was made to set the project up with an initial budget of £2500 and the Clerk would check to see if a retrospective grant can be arranged later.
    Yardley Manor Community Building
    Ian Stokes said he had been concerned about the proposed community building on this new estate for some time. He said he didn’t think the proposed building was fit for purpose. The design changes that the council put in have been ignored. Are we going to end up being burdened with a building that we have no use for, Ian wondered. This should be a community building that will be used by the community he said. We should be making this a ‘wellbeing’ centre, we should be making it a ‘knit and natter’ centre, a ‘parents and toddlers’ centre, a coffee shop. We don’t need more sports facilities he added. It’s going to be in the middle of a new housing estate with lots of families there. I fear this building is being dumped on us by the developer: do we want to stop it and if so, how can we stop it? Ben said that at the recent planning committee meeting the council voiced their objection to the building. Chris Tennant agreed – we wrote a letter of objection against the building he said, with detailed comments which were checked by industry professionals. Since then there have been alterations to the plans, changes to the way they heat and light the building. That said the comments we made still stand. It’s got changing rooms that we don’t think are fit for purpose, it’s got a hall that is too small. We aren’t the only objectors to the building, added Chris. Milton Keynes Council have also objected so we need to try to get some amendments done and a building that is closer to our wishes.  Can we refuse to take ownership of the building? It was fighting talk from Ian, met with silence. Good question, said the Mayor. More silence. I don’t know the answer to that one, he said. Even more silence. Actually, nobody knew the answer to that one. Ian was up for further fighting talk: We need to tell the developer ‘crack on if you want to’ but we’re not taking ownership of it, he boomed. We don’t want to get to that point though, do we?, countered Colin. There’s clearly a disconnect and I don’t know how we get around that.  We told them what we want and they have clearly just carried on wholesale, said Jane Varley, joining Ian’s side in the fight. That’s why we have this problem. We have talked to them and they are not listening.  Were the changes you wanted more expensive for the developer?, asked Debbie Hall. No, we know it’s affordable, the changes we were proposing were fundamental ones, said Chris. The rooms and layout, basic changes to make them usable for various groups, he added. The changes were not implying additional costs, confirmed Trevor. That’s right, because there were two versions, agreed Ian. There was the Rolls-Royce version, he said, adopting the tone of a car dealer, but this was the Mondeo version – it needed different wheels on it and different bumpers to make it roadworthy.  Chris suggested that they pick up the conversation with the consortium and the Mayor proposed that the council writes a letter to the developers to re-engage with them over this topic.
    Ann Hopkins Smith charity
    Letters from the charity concerning the charges for the lease of the town’s Charity Pitch were accepted by the council. Ian Stokes abstained as he had a declaration of interest.
    Next meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 7th November in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the Mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk:  townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Olney Council report for November 2022
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Apologies were received from Naomi Brock, Jane Varley and Trevor Aldred. Chris Tennant declared a non-pecuniary interest in the agenda item regarding an update on the Yardley Manor Community Building as a nearby resident. Dierdre Bethune questioned whether it was necessary for Chris to do this every time the subject was discussed but Mayor Ben Brown thought he should in the interests of transparency.
    Ward Councillors report
    Peter Geary gave the report on behalf of the ward councillors. The road closure in bridge street had been requested by Cadent to provide gas to the new properties in the ex-Wine Bar and it was expected that water and electricity services would be provided at the same time to avoid further road closures. It will be disruptive, he said, but one-way local access via Lime street will still be possible, as will access via Coneygere. The main diversion routes will be through Weston Underwood and Turvey, he said. The closure will commence at 09:30 on Monday 14/11/22 for 24 hrs a day and should be completed by the following Friday Milton Keynes City Council (MKCC) have created a funding package of £180K for ‘keeping people warm’ which will be distributed to parishes according to perceived need. Some parishes will get £12K, some will get £4K and the rest will get £500. As some smaller surrounding parishes will not be in a position to spend their allowance, he thought it would be a good idea for Olney Town Council (OTC) to pool funds with them and ‘do something sensible with it’ for their residents as well as Olney’s. The final issue was the much discussed issue of the changes to the No 41 Northampton to Bedford bus service. Contrary to popular rumour, MKCC has not cut funding for the service which they had subsidised for many years in order for it to divert from Lavendon to Olney and back out to Yardley Hastings, Peter said. The operator had declined to continue to do this, so MKConnect have been asked to consider crossing the border to connect with the service terminating at Turvey. However, this is not considered a reliable alternative and so far they have been reluctant to do so, although the ward councillors would continue to push them to so do. Colin Rodden noted that students at Bedford Sixth Form were suffering great inconvenience and wondered what else could be done. Unfortunately, it comes down to money, said Peter, as costs of fuel and driver wages were increasing and usage had gone down since Covid. He emphasised that MKCC would continue to offer the subsidy right up to the end of the current budgeting period but the moment the budget happens it would have to be withdrawn if it hadn’t been spent in the current period. That subsidy was £100K a year, he said, and noted that if the 1000 people who signed the petition to retain the service were prepared to pay £2 per week it could be maintained (but presumably not much use if the operator declined to accept it). Local authorities were restricted to a 2% increase in Council Tax Precept and with inflation running at 10% and MKCC was already calling on reserves to fill a £5M deficit and balance the budget. Debbie Whitworth said she had had a meeting with a representative from Stagecoach who had agreed to a further meeting to which representatives from the local authorities of MK, Bedford and Northampton would be invited, together with MPs for those area affected and the heads of the colleges in Northampton and Bedford and she said she truly believed that the collaborative approach would lead to resolution.
    PCSO’s report
    There was no PCSO report this month, so Ben Brown read out the crime stats for the month. Ron Hall asked if there was indication where the reported incidents had taken place. Ben said it wasn’t possible to break the stats down to that level but would ask PCSO James Andrews if there were any particular areas of concern.
    Expenditure report
    Ben Brown presented the monthly expenditure report for October and although it was not discussed, Mercury noted a sum of £9339.77 to MKCC for ‘election costs’. This is presumably for the recent OTC election where Ron Hall and David Tyler were elected and was necessary because 10 residents had written to the Returning Officing requesting an election, rather than have the vacant posts filled by co-option. Ben said that the budget setting for next F/Y was currently underway and meetings of the finance committee and would be finalised at the December meeting so that it could be presented to full council in January. Last year was the first time that many of the ‘new’ members had been involved in this exercise and there were items of expenditure that had been missed, so he urged all councillors to ensure that their sub-committees identified any items that need to be included in the budget.
    Reports from External meetings
    Ian Stokes reported that he and Town Clerk Jane Brushwood had been to the Pre-School AGM and said there had been a good turn out of supportive parents to what was obviously a dedicated team. The main issues appeared to be capacity and the limited floor space available but there were limits to the numbers that could be accommodated due to child/helper ratios and number of toilets. It is a well-run facility managing on a tight budget and a valuable tenant, he said.
    Section 106 allocations
    Jane Brushwood reported that the Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA) at the recreation ground was currently being refurbished. Laying of the surface was due to be completed by the end of that week but subsequent marking out of the lines was very weather dependent, she said. The booking diary of groups wishing to use it was already full, she said. Colin Rodden noted that it had been in a dilapidated state for some time and the return to use was some that should be communicated to the public and celebrated as a success.  Although not Section 106 funded, jane said that the provision of a Community Fridge was underway with a shed on order, so she hoped it would be up and running within the next 3-4 weeks.
    Recreation ground and volunteer scheme
    During the summer the group had been set up with the intention of advising visitors of the restrictions that apply to the consumption of alcohol, use of barbecues and to discourage the leaving of litter. Deputy Town Clerk Rob Mungham presented a report of the recent meeting with volunteer marshals, where all bar one had said they were willing to participate next summer. The current group number 16-18 but many more were needed, he said. Ian Stokes interjected to say that to effectively cover the three entrances to the recreation ground for two hours at a time ‘hundreds’ of volunteers were required. Given the size of the population and the number of comments on social media he hoped many more people would come forward and join the rota. Rob agreed, saying it was unrealistic for the current group, however committed, to manage the period from the end of May to September. The intention is to commence in time for the May half term holiday and school year 11/13 study leave as they could be busy times if the weather was good, particularly during the evening which had not previously been covered. Ian said the main purpose was to help and advise rather than confront, and those that participated had found it a positive experience. There had been some abusive and threatening behaviour, he said, but that had been directed to the paid security controls down at the river, not the volunteers on the entrance. It was important to continue with those patrols he thought, but they could be reduced if more volunteers were in place. Peter Geary said the cost of those patrols would need to be built into the budget for next f/y. Ben Brown said there had been recent reports of antisocial behaviour at the recreation ground, but all of the CCTV cameras were now working 24/7 and were providing very clear pictures enabling the identification of individuals which will be passed on to the police, when necessary. Jane Brushwood said she had printed off some pictures of individuals seen climbing on the roof of the football stand and stuck them to the wall (with faces pixelated) with the caption “Hi guys, we’re watching you – smile for the camera”. They had been removed but those individuals now knew they had been identified, she said. Colin Rodden wondered if in the event of the individuals falling through or off the roof if OTC could be held liable and Ian Stokes suggested there might be a duty of care to display warning notices. There was little sympathy expressed around the table for such an occurrence. 
    Flag flying policy
    At the September meeting Jane Brushwood had presented a draft flag flying policy which had been the subject of much discussion and some disagreement and this month the updated version was resented. Deirdre Bethune noted that it wasn’t mandatory to have such a policy and Jane agreed but said it was advisable. She said there were some Olney specific considerations, such as Pancake Day when it has been a tradition to fly the Kansas state flag alongside the Union flag. Debbie Hall noted that the Ukrainian flags had been removed from the OTC flag poles and wondered if they would be reinstated after Remembrance Sunday? Peter Geary said that if any other flag was flying in front of the war memorial in the Market Place, then the Union flag should always be flown alongside it. Information on which flags should be flown and when are readily available, he said, including the flag of St George on St George’s Day. Would that be flown during the football World Cup, her wondered? Jane said there was simple answer to that as OTC did not possess one. Returning to the subject of the Ukrainian flag, Debbie hall wondered if it should also be flown on Remembrance Sunday to remember conflicts around the world but David Tyler interjected to say that Remembrance Sunday was specifically to remember British Service personnel, not other nationalities, and Peter Geary agreed saying it was the one day that the Ukrainian flag should not be flown. One particular paragraph caused much discussion:‘From Summer 2021 government guidance states that UK Government building flagpoles should not remain empty – the default should be flying the Union Flag if no other flag is being flown. This guidance is aimed at UK Government buildings, however, they encourage local authorities and other local organisations to follow suit where they wish to fly flags.’ Deirdre asked if the Olney Centre was considered a government building in that context? She proposed that the paragraph be removed and OTC could decide if they wanted to fly a flag. Colin Rodden was of the opposite opinion, saying that OTC needed to be patriotic. Jane pointed out that the policy also stated ‘Flags are normally flown from sunrise to sunset but they may also be flown at night, when they should be illuminated’. There then followed a lengthy discussion about the merits of paying someone or raise and lower the flag at various time of the day and night vs the cost and environmental impact of providing floodlighting, particularly, as Jane pointed out, there is currently no power supply where the flagpole is located. Eventually the proposal to remove the paragraph was defeated by a majority but it was agreed to remove the paragraph referring to sunrise, sunset and floodlighting and the updated policy was agreed unanimously.  Returning to the issue of the Ukrainian flag, it was agreed that it could be flown after Remembrance Sunday and then reviewed periodically. Dan Rowlands asked about the flags along the High Street and Ben said they were the responsibility of individual households and not OTC. Debbie Hall said there had been amazing support for this action and although some people had been against it, the vast majority of right thinking people were really happy to see the flags. Although some had become ‘tatty’ the householders were committed to renewing them.  It was further agreed to fly the Kansas State flag on Pancake Day.
    Outdoor nativity
    A request had been received from the combined St Peter & St Paul and Baptist Churched to put on an Outdoor Nativity on Sunday December 11th in the Guinea Orchard park (around the back of the museum/The Swan/old Rectory). There would be two performances of around 30 mins mid-afternoon. This would be a great event for the community, open to all and bringing the original Christmas story to life in a fun and yet meaningful way. The request was granted.
    Yardley Manor community building
    Chris Tennant reported that planning permission for the building had now been passed with a raft of conditions attached that address the majority of points that OTC had raised, including energy efficiency, landscaping, cycle and electric vehicle parking. The internal design had not changed, and it would have a ‘barn aesthetic’, he said. Local residents were pleased that they would be getting a community facility, together with sports pitches and play areas. Ben Brown said that there were lots of groups interested in booking it and it would be an asset to the community. Ian Stokes said in his opinion the building was still a white elephant, albeit a more environmentally friendly one, but would be a burden on public funds as the design did not address the issue that OTC had originally raised. The changing rooms and floor footprint are not suitable for sports teams. The developer was building what they wanted to build, not what OTC wanted, he thought. Chris said he fundamentally disagreed with that view as the Yardley Manor community are desperate for the building. Colin Rodden said that the building was not just for the Yardley Manor residents, but the whole community and he hoped it would take some pressure off the recreation ground. Peter Geary said decisions would need to be made as to whether it was run by OTC and its staff or another community group. Debbie Hall thought it would be a great asset to the community and would be a ‘marvellous’ facility.
    Johnsons Field development
    At the September meeting a first draft of the proposals from MKCC for enhancing Johnsons Field had been discussed, following a number of representations from residents in the public participation section. The updated plans have not yet been produced by MKCC so the item was deferred to a future meeting. However, Peter Geary thought it worthwhile to decide how OTC would consult the public on the plans now, so that a detailed response could be provided at the earliest opportunity, since the present council had been elected on a promise to consult with the public. Members suggested stalls on the Thursday and Sunday markets and at Dickens of a Christmas, as well as a consultation evening and permanent display at the Olney Centre, social media and online surveys 
    The next meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 5th December, at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Olney Council report for December 2022
    Intro
    It was a bitterly cold December night when Olney Town Council gathered for their monthly get-together and councillors turned up stamping their feet and blowing into their hands. Thankfully someone had turned the Olney Centre’s heating system up to full chat to take the edge off, but even that over-worked boiler wasn’t prepared for the frosty atmosphere that was to come. Milton Keynes Council were not happy…
    Apologies for absence and declaration of interest
    Maybe it was the freezing weather or perhaps just that busy time of year but there were several absences. Trevor Aldred, Deirdre Bethune, Naomi Brock, Ian Stokes, Jane Varley and deputy mayor Debbie Whitworth all sent their apologies. The council chamber echoed with emptiness. Mayor Ben Brown asked if anyone had any declarations of interest. There were none. The minutes of November’s meeting had to be approved next, and they duly were. So, it was all going smoothly.
    Ward Councillor's report
    But here’s where the good cheer and bonhomie of a pre-Christmas council get-together took a turn for the worse. Ward Councillor David Hosking was in town to deliver his council’s regular report and you could see there was something troubling him. The body language was all wrong: there was a slight shaking of the hand that gripped his notes, he moved from one foot to the other, and there didn’t seem to be any eye contact.  Councillor Hosking started with a reference to an item that was further down the agenda: seeking feedback on the MKC proposal for electric vehicle (EV) charging points on Olney’s Cattle Market car park. He and his colleagues wanted to know if local people think the site, near Market Place, is suitable for additional vehicle chargers. Olney already has some electric plug-in points at the other end of town plus one on Market Place. The focus of the Cattle Market chargers, said David, was on Olney residents, rather than people who come in from outside of town. They would be useful for residents who need to charge their cars but don’t have their own chargers at home. Eight bays are considered to be economically viable, he said. The Ward Councillors’ role is to listen to residents and represent their views as best as possible, he reminded everyone, and to find the best solutions he would also like to hear the views of OTC as part of that process. His second update concerned another service provided by MKC, namely the Highways. I’ll touch briefly on the A509 closure (near The Swan pub), he said, as the icy atmosphere returned to the room. We did our utmost to reduce disruption here, he boomed. There was gas, electric, and water utilities all at the same time along with a number of other improvements to the road, and the problems were exacerbated by contractors finding a sink hole, which meant the road would have to be closed for a further three days to try to minimise disruption to residents and visitors to the town.  He stopped for a pause and the room knew that this was the root of David’s unrest. On he went: it was disappointing that there were some people that took it upon themselves to speak to retailers in particular and to offer advice about how they should deal with that particular problem. And all I say to that, he added, the anger palpable in his voice, is that four out of five roads into Olney during that eight day period were open. Candidly I say to the town council that criticism of our officers – many of whom live in the town by the way and who have social media accounts and look at what’s going on – has not gone down well.  Hindsight remains a very inexact science doesn’t it, he asked without requiring an answer. It was a strange comment but, whatever he meant, David’s message was clear – MK council felt very aggrieved.  Barely pausing for breath he continued: secondly, we have published a number of upcoming closures on the Noticeboard because one of the criticisms that we took was that communication was poor. Just to confirm that doesn’t include any emergency closures. OTC had taken criticism not just for the A509 issue but for other issues too and David agreed that residents are now confused about who is responsible for various services in Olney. It’s not just highways, he said, it extends to a number of services provided by MK Council – planning for example, 5G masts, waste and recycling collections to housing and social care services. All of those are the responsibility of MK City Council. So please, said David looking directly now at the Mayor, between us can we make it clear about who is responsible for what in the town so that we can serve our residents – the people we are supposed to be serving – together.  Colin Rodden jumped to OTC’s defence. A number of retailers have contacted me about that closure. I think it might have been helpful if we had said businesses were still open even when the road was closed, he suggested. There are lessons to be learned from that, if the A509 was ever closed again. We should let the businesses know that we are working together. I feel that for councillors in situ who speak to retailers and so on, on a daily basis, there is going to be some criticism. Yes countered David the fury still blazing in his eyes, but I would not go on to the Noticeboard and criticise your Clerk for example, I would do it in a different way.  So, the problem is councillors posting things on the Noticeboard, is that what you are saying, asked Colin. Yes, said David, at the end of the day, our officers are human beings and nobody likes being criticised do they? Especially when they have tried to make sure things were done well and, in my opinion, taken good decisions. People don’t understand the legislation behind these closures, Peter Geary waded in. They don’t realise that if there is going to be a closure you try to co-ordinate it so that the three services can be done together. Peter agreed that signage does need to be discussed but added that very few people read signs these days anyway. Well, there must have been something wrong, said an incredulous Debbie Hall. There are pictures of enormous lorries going through Coneygere (the narrow road at the back of Olney). Yes, repeated Peter, people don’t read signs. Debbie added that a day into the roadworks and with so many roads closed, Olney had the feel of a town that wasn’t open. Colin Rodden agreed: the town was incredibly quiet he said, and shops’ takings were considerably down. And there is the problem, said Peter, his hands raised in dismay. You’re criticised if lorries come into the town trying to get through and then you are criticised when the road closures are working and the town feels empty. You will never, ever get it right, he added with the shake of the head. The Mayor said it was obvious that education, and learning from this, was an important part of the process. He said he appreciated that MK Council had done what they could to minimise the disruption in what he described as ‘one of the hardest places in the Milton Keynes area to close a road’. He said he had been contacted by local businesses and that some of the emails were ‘not pleasant’ but he added that his council were not criticising MK officers – on the contrary they were supporting them. He proposed that both councils get together and have a meeting to discuss ways to improve the situation in the future. Residents don’t know who is responsible for which services, he said, and it was noted that OTC are not responsible for example, for planning, waste management, housing and the highways and should not be responding to residents on these matters. The Ward Councillors should be dealing with these. Chris Tennant said it might be useful if OTC and MKC agreed a schedule of who does what concerning town matters. People in the street don’t know what’s going on, he said, and it would be good if people could be directed to a website perhaps, with information on what’s happening in the town, then everyone is clear, he said. Yes said Ben, there are lessons to be learned here and the main one is communication. Let’s get a date in the diary for that meeting to discuss improvements. Councillor Hosking had another meeting to attend and left the table in a flurry of annoyance. He must have kicked himself then, that he had to return to the room because he had forgotten his car keys. Have a Happy Christmas David, Colin Rodden called after him.
    PCSO's report
    PCSO James Andrews was unable to be present at the meeting but he had sent in crime figures for November to the Clerk. The Mayor read through the gory details: two cases of stalking and harassment, three suspicious persons, two suspicious cars, two suspicious ‘other’, three thefts, two public orders and four road collisions. Overall said Ben cheerily, there was a decrease in crime and if there are any questions James can be contacted. 
    Expenditure report and budget to date
    The Mayor gave a summary of the main points: they are projected to exceed budget on income he said, for the Thursday Market and the Farmer’s Market, which is held once a month. The Farmers Market might be affected for the next couple of months because December’s one was Dickens of a Christmas and there is no Farmers Market planned for January. There are a good number of stall holders he said. The Olney Centre has also generated good income, with many rooms being booked out throughout the day and into the evenings. The MUGA (Multi-use games area) was likewise – there are already nine regular bookings during the week and targets for that are expected to be exceeded. On water rates and utilities, expenditure is up but they are often not used much in some areas as consumption hasn’t been as high as expected. Expenditure for maintenance on the Rec is up but that’s to be expected, he said, considering the extra work they had to do there controlling visitors and ensuring extra waste collections on the recreational space. Staffing is a big use of budget and there was a slight increase in payments to temporary staff and contractors said the Mayor. We are in a healthy place, though, and let’s ensure we retain that position.  Councillors who represent at external meetings There were no external meetings by councillors to report but Ben had been busy. He attended a past players lunch at Olney Rugby Club where they also unveiled a memorial at which Mary Prosser attended in her capacity as British Legion Standard Bearer. There was also the Remembrance Sunday event which was well attended by councillors (and Mary was Standard Bearer again), he opened the Christmas Tree Festival at the church and was hosting at the annual Dickens event, for which he had already received great feedback including praise and thanks from towns-people.
    Section 106 spending
    Work on the MUGA has been halted, said the Clerk, because of the colder weather. It hasn’t had its final top surface coat she said and it hasn’t got its lines yet but it is useable as it is she added. That will all be done when the weather gets a bit drier, added the Mayor. One thing that does use up money is the Rec and a separate report was given about this land. The newly-installed CCTV cameras have been very successful said the Mayor and are providing excellent coverage of the area. There are other security issues to be covered including getting more volunteers to help keep an eye on the Rec and advertisements asking for people’s help will go out for that. Related to that was an agenda item to approve annual events on OTC land. They get asked for permission throughout the year said the Mayor on events such as the March Pancake Race, Motorama on the Market Place, the River Festival, Fireworks at the Rec, BOFF food festival and the Dickens event in December. There is a one-off request for July for an AG250 (Amazing Grace) event on the allotments field. Chris Tennant said that there will also be a Rugby Sevens match which uses Rugby land, of course, but also OTC land for parking. It’s a potential income generator he said, for parking. Five pounds a car, 200 cars, he added with a glint in his eye and the cash registers clearly ringing in his ears. There were nods of agreement all around the table for that little enterprise. The Farmers Market at Dickens will be discussed at a later date, said the Clerk because some people think the first week of December is too early for this festive event. However, if it’s not held on the 3rd or 4th of December, some of the market stall holders could be elsewhere, she added.
    Proposal for twinning with Olney, Illinois
    This is the most interesting item on the agenda this evening said the Mayor. It was certainly quite an unusual topic to be discussing at an OTC meeting. The Clerk had received a letter and some information from the US town asking for the two Olneys to become ‘sisters’ as the word ‘twinning;’ isn’t actually used. There are three other Olneys in the States, said the Clerk but is this something that we would like to do? Has anyone ever been to Olney Illinois, asked Peter Geary. No, said everyone around the table. Well, I have, said Peter proudly. The jet-setter had passed through the town and knew all about its rare albino squirrels. He thought the ‘sistering’ idea was a good one, well worth exploring further. Ben agreed, he would like to explore this – there’s a unique connection with the name, he said, and it could open up opportunities such as visits and education for local schools and the museum. He proposed that the matter is further investigated and everyone agreed. Peter said that Milton Keynes had been twinned with a city in Belgium but that had ‘fizzled out’ as ‘nothing had happened’. The council would not want the same happening with the two Olneys.
    EV charging points on the Cattle Market car park
    The Mayor said he was in favour of more EV (electric vehicle) points in the town but that the parking bays should not be exclusively set aside for EVs, which is similar for other parts of Olney. The council has not historically been in favour of EV-only parking.  Peter Geary said he thought the charging points could work well during the day for visitors and then double up as chargers for residents who do not have their own power point at home. It should be a reliable and secure site, he added, and said that what the town needs is fast-chargers which power up cars at a much quicker rate than the trickle charge of home units. It’s time also to change the one on the Market Place for a fast charger, he added. For residents using the car park overnight, a slow charger would be fine but not for visitors looking for a quick power boost.  David Tyler is an EV owner and he agreed that fast chargers are definitely needed and that ‘EV-only’ parking should be enforced only overnight when local people want to make use of them. Debbie Hall said she thought electric charging bays should be for EVs only as visitors want to be sure that there is a good chance of a bay being available for them if they come into the town. Peter Geary said the Market Place bay is often empty even though there is no enforcement against petrol cars there. In fact, he said the person who uses it most is the traffic warden when he comes to do his regular inspections. There might come a day when it is enforced, he said, but that’s not now. The main aim of this latest plan is to help local people who need to charge their cars overnight, not for visitors who require a boost for a couple of hours. Chris Tennant proposed that the council support the installation of new chargers but then add afterwards (and here is the kicker, he said) that they want to see some more fast chargers and also ensure that there’s more security at that car park. Talking of charging, another item on the agenda was a proposed art installation on the new Yardley Manor estate. Peter Geary was straight in, asking if there was a charge for ownership and upkeep. It will have a running cost for the maintenance of it and there needs to be a debate about who owns that artwork, he said. There’s potential for vandalism too, and what happens if someone runs over it and knocks it flat: is there insurance? Usually, said Peter, developers give councils a sum of cash and say: go and sort out some public art. But this developer has decided that they are going to organise the art themselves and they have commissioned an artist who has the backing of the MK arts officer.  It was proposed that the council takes ownership of the sculpture, subject to negotiations. That commits them to nothing but demonstrates their interest and allows the Clerk to start negotiations.
    The next meeting
    The next meeting will be on Monday 9th January at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the Mayor deems appropriate, please contact the town clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    ------
    Mercury's reports in our 2023 editions
    Mercury issue for January 2023 (December 2022 meeting)
    Intro
    It was a bitterly cold December night when Olney Town Council gathered for their monthly get-together and councillors turned up stamping their feet and blowing into their hands. Thankfully someone had turned the Olney Centre’s heating system up to full chat to take the edge off, but even that over-worked boiler wasn’t prepared for the frosty atmosphere that was to come. Milton Keynes Council were not happy…
    Apologies for absence and declaration of interest
    Maybe it was the freezing weather or perhaps just that busy time of year but there were several absences. Trevor Aldred, Deirdre Bethune, Naomi Brock, Ian Stokes, Jane Varley and deputy mayor Debbie Whitworth all sent their apologies. The council chamber echoed with emptiness. Mayor Ben Brown asked if anyone had any declarations of interest. There were none. The minutes of November’s meeting had to be approved next, and they duly were. So, it was all going smoothly.
    Ward Councillor’s report
    But here’s where the good cheer and bonhomie of a pre-Christmas council get-together took a turn for the worse. Ward Councillor David Hosking was in town to deliver his council’s regular report and you could see there was something troubling him. The body language was all wrong: there was a slight shaking of the hand that gripped his notes, he moved from one foot to the other, and there didn’t seem to be any eye contact.  Councillor Hosking started with a reference to an item that was further down the agenda: seeking feedback on the MKC proposal for electric vehicle (EV) charging points on Olney’s Cattle Market car park. He and his colleagues wanted to know if local people think the site, near Market Place, is suitable for additional vehicle chargers. Olney already has some electric plug-in points at the other end of town plus one on Market Place. The focus of the Cattle Market chargers, said David, was on Olney residents, rather than people who come in from outside of town. They would be useful for residents who need to charge their cars but don’t have their own chargers at home. Eight bays are considered to be economically viable, he said. The Ward Councillors’ role is to listen to residents and represent their views as best as possible, he reminded everyone, and to find the best solutions he would also like to hear the views of OTC as part of that process. His second update concerned another service provided by MKC, namely the Highways. I’ll touch briefly on the A509 closure (near The Swan pub), he said, as the icy atmosphere returned to the room. We did our utmost to reduce disruption here, he boomed. There was gas, electric, and water utilities all at the same time along with a number of other improvements to the road, and the problems were exacerbated by contractors finding a sink hole, which meant the road would have to be closed for a further three days to try to minimise disruption to residents and visitors to the town.  He stopped for a pause and the room knew that this was the root of David’s unrest. On he went: it was disappointing that there were some people that took it upon themselves to speak to retailers in particular and to offer advice about how they should deal with that particular problem. And all I say to that, he added, the anger palpable in his voice, is that four out of five roads into Olney during that eight day period were open. Candidly I say to the town council that criticism of our officers – many of whom live in the town by the way and who have social media accounts and look at what’s going on – has not gone down well.  Hindsight remains a very inexact science doesn’t it, he asked without requiring an answer. It was a strange comment but, whatever he meant, David’s message was clear – MK council felt very aggrieved.  Barely pausing for breath he continued: secondly, we have published a number of upcoming closures on the Noticeboard because one of the criticisms that we took was that communication was poor. Just to confirm that doesn’t include any emergency closures. OTC had taken criticism not just for the A509 issue but for other issues too and David agreed that residents are now confused about who is responsible for various services in Olney. It’s not just highways, he said, it extends to a number of services provided by MK Council – planning for example, 5G masts, waste and recycling collections to housing and social care services. All of those are the responsibility of MK City Council. So please, said David looking directly now at the Mayor, between us can we make it clear about who is responsible for what in the town so that we can serve our residents – the people we are supposed to be serving – together.  Colin Rodden jumped to OTC’s defence. A number of retailers have contacted me about that closure. I think it might have been helpful if we had said businesses were still open even when the road was closed, he suggested. There are lessons to be learned from that, if the A509 was ever closed again. We should let the businesses know that we are working together. I feel that for councillors in situ who speak to retailers and so on, on a daily basis, there is going to be some criticism. Yes countered David the fury still blazing in his eyes, but I would not go on to the Noticeboard and criticise your Clerk for example, I would do it in a different way.  So, the problem is councillors posting things on the Noticeboard, is that what you are saying, asked Colin. Yes, said David, at the end of the day, our officers are human beings and nobody likes being criticised do they? Especially when they have tried to make sure things were done well and, in my opinion, taken good decisions. People don’t understand the legislation behind these closures, Peter Geary waded in. They don’t realise that if there is going to be a closure you try to co-ordinate it so that the three services can be done together. Peter agreed that signage does need to be discussed but added that very few people read signs these days anyway. Well, there must have been something wrong, said an incredulous Debbie Hall. There are pictures of enormous lorries going through Coneygere (the narrow road at the back of Olney). Yes, repeated Peter, people don’t read signs. Debbie added that a day into the roadworks and with so many roads closed, Olney had the feel of a town that wasn’t open. Colin Rodden agreed: the town was incredibly quiet he said, and shops’ takings were considerably down. And there is the problem, said Peter, his hands raised in dismay. You’re criticised if lorries come into the town trying to get through and then you are criticised when the road closures are working and the town feels empty. You will never, ever get it right, he added with the shake of the head. The Mayor said it was obvious that education, and learning from this, was an important part of the process. He said he appreciated that MK Council had done what they could to minimise the disruption in what he described as ‘one of the hardest places in the Milton Keynes area to close a road’. He said he had been contacted by local businesses and that some of the emails were ‘not pleasant’ but he added that his council were not criticising MK officers – on the contrary they were supporting them. He proposed that both councils get together and have a meeting to discuss ways to improve the situation in the future. Residents don’t know who is responsible for which services, he said, and it was noted that OTC are not responsible for example, for planning, waste management, housing and the highways and should not be responding to residents on these matters. The Ward Councillors should be dealing with these. Chris Tennant said it might be useful if OTC and MKC agreed a schedule of who does what concerning town matters. People in the street don’t know what’s going on, he said, and it would be good if people could be directed to a website perhaps, with information on what’s happening in the town, then everyone is clear, he said. Yes said Ben, there are lessons to be learned here and the main one is communication. Let’s get a date in the diary for that meeting to discuss improvements. Councillor Hosking had another meeting to attend and left the table in a flurry of annoyance. He must have kicked himself then, that he had to return to the room because he had forgotten his car keys. Have a Happy Christmas David, Colin Rodden called after him.
    PCSO’s report
    PCSO James Andrews was unable to be present at the meeting but he had sent in crime figures for November to the Clerk. The Mayor read through the gory details: two cases of stalking and harassment, three suspicious persons, two suspicious cars, two suspicious ‘other’, three thefts, two public orders and four road collisions. Overall said Ben cheerily, there was a decrease in crime and if there are any questions James can be contacted. 
    Expenditure report and budget to date
    The Mayor gave a summary of the main points: they are projected to exceed budget on income he said, for the Thursday Market and the Farmer’s Market, which is held once a month. The Farmers Market might be affected for the next couple of months because December’s one was Dickens of a Christmas and there is no Farmers Market planned for January. There are a good number of stall holders he said. The Olney Centre has also generated good income, with many rooms being booked out throughout the day and into the evenings. The MUGA (Multi-use games area) was likewise – there are already nine regular bookings during the week and targets for that are expected to be exceeded. On water rates and utilities, expenditure is up but they are often not used much in some areas as consumption hasn’t been as high as expected. Expenditure for maintenance on the Rec is up but that’s to be expected, he said, considering the extra work they had to do there controlling visitors and ensuring extra waste collections on the recreational space. Staffing is a big use of budget and there was a slight increase in payments to temporary staff and contractors said the Mayor. We are in a healthy place, though, and let’s ensure we retain that position.  Councillors who represent at external meetings There were no external meetings by councillors to report but Ben had been busy. He attended a past players lunch at Olney Rugby Club where they also unveiled a memorial at which Mary Prosser attended in her capacity as British Legion Standard Bearer. There was also the Remembrance Sunday event which was well attended by councillors (and Mary was Standard Bearer again), he opened the Christmas Tree Festival at the church and was hosting at the annual Dickens event, for which he had already received great feedback including praise and thanks from towns-people.
    Section 106 spending
    Work on the MUGA has been halted, said the Clerk, because of the colder weather. It hasn’t had its final top surface coat she said and it hasn’t got its lines yet but it is useable as it is she added. That will all be done when the weather gets a bit drier, added the Mayor. One thing that does use up money is the Rec and a separate report was given about this land. The newly-installed CCTV cameras have been very successful said the Mayor and are providing excellent coverage of the area. There are other security issues to be covered including getting more volunteers to help keep an eye on the Rec and advertisements asking for people’s help will go out for that. Related to that was an agenda item to approve annual events on OTC land. They get asked for permission throughout the year said the Mayor on events such as the March Pancake Race, Motorama on the Market Place, the River Festival, Fireworks at the Rec, BOFF food festival and the Dickens event in December. There is a one-off request for July for an AG250 (Amazing Grace) event on the allotments field. Chris Tennant said that there will also be a Rugby Sevens match which uses Rugby land, of course, but also OTC land for parking. It’s a potential income generator he said, for parking. Five pounds a car, 200 cars, he added with a glint in his eye and the cash registers clearly ringing in his ears. There were nods of agreement all around the table for that little enterprise. The Farmers Market at Dickens will be discussed at a later date, said the Clerk because some people think the first week of December is too early for this festive event. However, if it’s not held on the 3rd or 4th of December, some of the market stall holders could be elsewhere, she added.
    Proposal for twinning with Olney, Illinois
    This is the most interesting item on the agenda this evening said the Mayor. It was certainly quite an unusual topic to be discussing at an OTC meeting. The Clerk had received a letter and some information from the US town asking for the two Olneys to become ‘sisters’ as the word ‘twinning;’ isn’t actually used. There are three other Olneys in the States, said the Clerk but is this something that we would like to do? Has anyone ever been to Olney Illinois, asked Peter Geary. No, said everyone around the table. Well, I have, said Peter proudly. The jet-setter had passed through the town and knew all about its rare albino squirrels. He thought the ‘sistering’ idea was a good one, well worth exploring further. Ben agreed, he would like to explore this – there’s a unique connection with the name, he said, and it could open up opportunities such as visits and education for local schools and the museum. He proposed that the matter is further investigated and everyone agreed. Peter said that Milton Keynes had been twinned with a city in Belgium but that had ‘fizzled out’ as ‘nothing had happened’. The council would not want the same happening with the two Olneys.
    EV charging points on the Cattle Market car park
    The Mayor said he was in favour of more EV (electric vehicle) points in the town but that the parking bays should not be exclusively set aside for EVs, which is similar for other parts of Olney. The council has not historically been in favour of EV-only parking.  Peter Geary said he thought the charging points could work well during the day for visitors and then double up as chargers for residents who do not have their own power point at home. It should be a reliable and secure site, he added, and said that what the town needs is fast-chargers which power up cars at a much quicker rate than the trickle charge of home units. It’s time also to change the one on the Market Place for a fast charger, he added. For residents using the car park overnight, a slow charger would be fine but not for visitors looking for a quick power boost.  David Tyler is an EV owner and he agreed that fast chargers are definitely needed and that ‘EV-only’ parking should be enforced only overnight when local people want to make use of them. Debbie Hall said she thought electric charging bays should be for EVs only as visitors want to be sure that there is a good chance of a bay being available for them if they come into the town. Peter Geary said the Market Place bay is often empty even though there is no enforcement against petrol cars there. In fact, he said the person who uses it most is the traffic warden when he comes to do his regular inspections. There might come a day when it is enforced, he said, but that’s not now. The main aim of this latest plan is to help local people who need to charge their cars overnight, not for visitors who require a boost for a couple of hours. Chris Tennant proposed that the council support the installation of new chargers but then add afterwards (and here is the kicker, he said) that they want to see some more fast chargers and also ensure that there’s more security at that car park. Talking of charging, another item on the agenda was a proposed art installation on the new Yardley Manor estate. Peter Geary was straight in, asking if there was a charge for ownership and upkeep. It will have a running cost for the maintenance of it and there needs to be a debate about who owns that artwork, he said. There’s potential for vandalism too, and what happens if someone runs over it and knocks it flat: is there insurance? Usually, said Peter, developers give councils a sum of cash and say: go and sort out some public art. But this developer has decided that they are going to organise the art themselves and they have commissioned an artist who has the backing of the MK arts officer.  It was proposed that the council takes ownership of the sculpture, subject to negotiations. That commits them to nothing but demonstrates their interest and allows the Clerk to start negotiations.
    The next meeting
    The next meeting will be on Monday 9th January at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the Mayor deems appropriate, please contact the town clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Mercury issue for February 2023 (January 2023 meeting)
    Intro
    If December’s meeting of Olney Town Council had been a tad light on personnel, the same could not be said for January’s gathering. The Olney Centre’s council chambers were positively buzzing with activity and renewed 2023-inspired vigour as councillors got back into the swing of things with the dawn of a new year. In fact, when Ron Hall arrived with just seconds to spare before the 7pm start time, fellow councillors on his side of the table had to shuffle up reluctantly to let him in – like passengers making room for someone who has just managed to jump on a train as it pulls out of the station.
    Apologies for absence and declaration of interest
    So it was that only Deirdre Bethune, Trevor Aldred and Colin Rodden had passed on apologies for no-showing. Councillor David Hosking was back to deliver Milton Keynes Council’s regular update and with both Town Clerk Jane Brushwood and Deputy Town Clerk Rob Mungham in attendance, there wasn’t an awful lot of elbow room at the table. Are there any declarations of interest, asked Mayor Ben Brown. There were three: Ian Stokes and Ben (sports club committee members) and Chris Tennant (association with the Caveman Conditioning group). Well, I’m not going to say Happy New Year, said the Mayor, adopting the tone of Ebenezer Scrooge. It’s the 9th of January and I only say that in the first week.  There was a pause while everyone took in those rather un-festive comments. We were half-expecting a ‘boo!’ but that brief silence possibly prompted Ben to have a change of heart: Happy New Year everyone, he finally uttered. The minutes of the December meeting were duly approved and it was on with the business in hand.
    Ward Councillor’s report
    David Hosking was in attendance once again. He, at least, was willing to wish everyone a Happy New Year. And a healthy one too, he said, 2023 is likely to be a challenging one for many and I hope that together MK City Council and OTC can continue to serve the residents of Olney and particularly those that need us most.  He had six updates to run through: EV charging points, litter, roads, Olney High Street, MK Councils budget consultation and housing growth. So a fair bit to cover, he said.  Those round the table noticeably settled themselves into their chairs for a long night ahead at that point. But they needn’t have worried – Councillor Hosking pranced through business like a Lipizzaner stallion. There was skill and finesse on show here as well as speed – David had another meeting to attend himself, so he wasn’t hanging around.  He mentioned that he had been seeking feedback since December on potential electric vehicle (EV) charging points in Olney’s Cattle Market car park. The vision was for eight parking bays with emphasis on people living in the town rather than on visitors. What was clear from the feedback David had received was that there was general support for the introduction of the charging bays but not necessarily at the expense of existing parking spaces in the town. That feedback was passed on to MK council officers and the plan to provide those spaces has now been removed. David went on next to litter: a problem that blights our area, he said, particularly on roadside verges. Ward Councillors have received several comments from residents about the A509 from the Land Rover roundabout right down passed Chicheley Hill into Olney and out towards Warrington. Part of the problem is that much of the vegetation has gone over the winter months so you can now see more litter. David and his team have spoken to MK officers who will publish a new cleansing programme for that road, he said, and also Chicheley Hill out to Stagsden. The cleansing programme had been interrupted he said, with officers doing other jobs but it will be re-started. Traffic management will be necessary on some stretches of the road, said David quickly, hoping it would be a throwaway line. ‘Traffic management’ usually translates as ‘temporary traffic lights’ and everyone knows that’s not a prospect that Olney residents driving home for the night ever want to consider. However, an accident on one stretch of the road a few years ago means that traffic management is necessary, said David, the memories of the furore surrounding the roadworks outside the Swan Inn in November clearly still hurting back at MK Council’s offices. Moving on David said that the roadworks on Lime Street and Weston Road over Christmas had been completed and that traffic lights had been removed. He said he had noticed that Anglian Water were ‘back in town’, almost as if an old nemesis had turned up uninvited. Ian Stokes stuck his hand up sheepishly. It’s my house, he said, there’s a flood. Thank you for that confirmation, said David, I should come here more often.  One disappointing item was the works being done to repair a strange and faulty piece of road on the A509 that refuses to go away, reported Councillor Hosking. It’s known as the ‘Roller-coaster’ and drivers will know it from the way it dips up and down alarmingly. A repair attempt had been made but hadn’t been successful. Ward Councillors had asked officers to look at that again and report back. They are also looking at repairing some potholes that have appeared around the town, keeping residents awake at night especially when HGVs pass through Olney in the twilight hours. Moving on to the High Street and providing support for retailers in the town, David said that it was well-known that businesses had been affected by Covid and that MKCC were keen to do whatever they could to help. There will be some further information on that coming up soon, he added, but I wanted to keep everyone up to speed at this point. We hope that it will be financial support as well as other types of help.  MKCC are currently consulting on its budgets for 2023/24 and the headline is an increase in Council Tax of 4.99% which includes social care precepts and social housing as well. OTC will be able to review that budget and comment on it to Milton Keynes. Finally he wanted everyone to know that an outline planning application for a further 800 new houses was granted as part of the Milton Keynes East project. This will increase traffic during the construction phase and also once the houses have been completed and people are living there, he warned. It won’t be helped by a new crossing which will almost certainly slow traffic down and might result in safety issues for pedestrians. David and fellow Ward Councillor Peter Geary have both voiced their concerns and spoken in objection to that decision but the vote has gone against them. 
    PCSO’s report
    Local PCSO James Andrews wasn’t able to be at the meeting so Ben said he would run through the report for December. The Clerk interjected and said that a last-minute report of stalking and harassment had been received which slightly changed the report. Breaking news, said Ben, there’s an extra one to add. The list included the following: one stalking & harassment, two suspicious persons, three suspicious vehicles, one theft, three criminal damage, one public order, two burglaries, two road collisions and four concerns for safety. If anyone has any queries, they can be passed to James via the Clerk, said Ben.
    Expenditure report and budget to date
    The main part of the meeting tonight is agreeing next year’s budget, and that will fall into that, said Ben. Nobody knew what he meant by that second part.  We have seen a progression, said the Mayor, and there’s going to be a small surplus. There’s nothing in there where we’re way over budget apart from the obvious open space budgets such as the Rec, but on the positive side the council have made some really good savings. They have reviewed contracts, for example, and it has certainly helped with budget setting this year. Ian Stokes asked about a particular expense under ‘Market Projects’: what’s that for, he queried. Is that on the Market, asked Ben, desperately trying to find what Ian was talking about. Yes, said Ian, fourth line from the bottom. Ah yes, said Ben, that’s for the refurbishment of the toilets. No it’s not, said the Clerk, who had clearly been waiting to see how Ben was going to answer. It’s for the electric bollards – the power points, she said adding without a hint of irony: it came as a shock to us. We held some money back originally, she said, but now the balance is due.
    Councillors who represent at external meetings
    Did anyone represent the council at any meetings asked the Mayor. Well, there was the AG250 event on 1st January, said the Clerk, and you were there. Yes, said Ben, that was the kick-off event over the Christmas period and of course Olney was featured on Songs of Praise on Sunday. There will be the AG250 events throughout the year and we will make sure we advertise those and attend wherever we can.  We also had the Christmas Lunch which some councillors took part in, said the Clerk. On Christmas Day? asked Ben. Yes, said the Clerk, and you could see she was thinking: well, when else would it be? It wasn’t a council thing, she said, but it was held here in the Olney Centre. The volunteers are too modest to take any credit but thank you to those who gave up their time to do that, said Ben.
    Update on S106 spending
    The Clerk said she’d had a meeting with Vistry Homes who are building on the Yardley Manor development on the outskirts of Olney. The discussion was about the proposed community building – Vistry were concerned that OTC were not prepared to take it on and were confused as to why the council had rejected it. They were asking what it is that OTC do want. I told them that it doesn’t meet any of our requirements as it’s neither a sports hall nor a community centre, said the Clerk. Separately, she had shown S106 officers from MKCC around the Olney Centre to demonstrate to them how things are done there and what improvements are needed.  The council now have a feasibility report about the Olney Centre. Ben said that the report was about looking at improvements to the building such as windows being changed and double glazing and the building of a mezzanine floor on the pre-school area so that they can have an office and kitchen upstairs and give more floor space for the children. They also want to increase door widths and add in solar panels and improve the heating system and refurbish the toilets. The Kitchener Centre has also been informed of funds available to them and they will make applications directly. Anyone can look at S106 availability, said the Clerk. There’s a computer programme on it, which is sat on my laptop and I will find out how it works and let people know, she said. But it is publicly available – it’s supposed to be all-singing, all-dancing. Chris Tennant congratulated the Clerk’s office on the work they have done on the Olney Centre project. He said one of the main benefits of the work was in reducing carbon emissions. Yes, agreed the Clerk, we are trying to get rid of the gas completely, she said, and we are looking at alternative ways of heating the building. She said they had been looking at something called a varied refrigerant flow system. There was total silence at this revelation. Clearly no-one had heard of it before. Someone had to break the hush: that sounds good, said the Mayor, to sighs of relief around the table.
    Updates on the Recreation Ground
    The Mayor said that updates on the Rec will appear on the agenda every month even though ‘there’s not a lot of swimming going down there at the moment’. The Deputy Clerk said that, in fact, two people had been in the water a few weeks ago.  Ben said that CCTV, which had been improved recently, is now offering greater coverage of the Rec and the car park. Some of the sports clubs there have added in their own CCTV on top of what the council had contributed, he added. The message for everyone is that if you are doing anything silly down there, you will be seen. The quality of the cameras is now so good, said Ben, that ‘you can see the raindrops on the river’. Volunteer marshals have been meeting to discuss what they have learned from previous years and there will be a call for more volunteers.
    Schedule of charges
    At this point two members of the public – Phonebox columnist David Pibworth and Kevin Viney, both of them former councillors – upped sticks and left the meeting without so much as a ‘by your leave’. Was it something I said?, asked Ben. Always, replied Ian Stokes. And we were just getting to the most exciting part of the night, said Ben, the draft schedule of charges.  These are what the council charges tenants to use its facilities and there had been a proposal to increase these by 2.5%. There was one exception to that: the Olney Centre where there would be no increase. Ian Stokes had been doing his maths homework. There seems to be an anomaly on our proposed rentals, he said. Rentals for the East Street building were different from that charged in the Olney Centre. We are not being consistent, he said. There’s nothing to stop us doing that, said the Mayor, we are entitled to. He added that they need to review it which could be done by the Recs and Services committee. Ian said he thought the council were undercharging for the East Street building and other facilities including the MUGA recreation area when compared with the Olney Centre. Peter Geary said that the council have a duty by law to make the best use of its facilities and can’t be seen to be offering lower rates. The Mayor said that he understood Ian’s frustrations and that further reviews would be made when they had clearer comparisons.
    Draft budget for 2023/24
    The Mayor reported that there was a forecasted income of £160,114.40 for the coming year and a forecasted expenditure figure of £500,050, which meant that there would be a precept request (what the council earns against what it spends) of £339,935.60 to Milton Keynes City Council. This is a 2.9% increase on the current precept. This was approved by the council and the precept sent to MKCC. Ben thanked Peter Geary for ‘getting his head in a lot of budgets’ at the Milton Keynes offices. It’s a budget we can be proud of, said Ben, and we have delivered good value to the people of Olney. On the subject of budgets, Peter Geary said that Ward Councillors have a discretionary grant of £1000 per year each to spend on community events and he was open to suggestions. Applications to receive this funding, as long as it’s match-funded, should be directed to Ward Councillor Keith McLean. The King’s Coronation later this year has been suggested for example, said the Clerk.
    Johnsons Field update
    The Mayor thanked the MKCC team for helping to develop a plan to improve the Johnsons Field recreational area in Olney. The Clerk said that planning permission would be required because new features are being proposed, not just repairs, before a public consultation process could be started.  Ian Stokes has always been a big fan of a new skate park and this was another opportunity for him to campaign to get one built. I think this is a good plan, he said. It’s a good use of space and offers facilities for a wide range of ages. Can I recommend that we do push for the skate park, he said. That is something that consistently comes back and children in the town ask for again and again. Ron Hall agreed that the plan had been mentioned several years ago and it is an ideal opportunity now to build it. Residents of Johnsons Field have expressed some concerns about these plans and I think we should be mindful of them, said Dan Rowland. There were nods of agreement around the table. Any other comments, asked the Mayor. From our experience, let’s not make the same mistakes again, said Ian. Can we include CCTV into these plans? There was again a long silence (and perhaps even a groan from someone) as it became clear that Ian might be on his own where closed circuit cameras were concerned. Again the Mayor had to break the hush: that’s a question we can go back to, he said. Councillors agreed that they would keep Olney residents informed about the Johnson Fields plans with exhibitions or displays so that people could make their own minds up in time to give their views. The Olney Centre and the Farmers Market were both identified as sites for the displays and information. A new footpath going across the Field is also proposed but where to put it? Peter Geary said the best way is to see where the grass becomes most worn out by people and then put the path there. Nobody could disagree with that logic.  A 28 day public consultation process was proposed and agreed. The council will also propose to MKCC that the current zipwire and an unused tyre swing on the Johnsons Field site is removed to make room for the proposed skate park.  Could Ian Stokes finally be getting his wish of a proper place for people to take their skateboards? Park that thought…
    The next meeting
    The next meeting will be on Monday 6th February at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the Mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Mercury issue for March 2023 (February 2023 meeting)
    Public participation and letters to the council
    There were two members of the public present but neither expressed a wish to speak, so the meeting quickly moved on to:
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Apologies were received from Naomi Brock, Ian Stokes and Trevor Aldred. There were no declarations of interest and no comments made on the minutes of last month’s meeting.
    Ward Councillors report
    David Hosking gave the report on behalf of the Milton Keynes City Council (MKCC) ward councillors. The first item concerned the litter on the A509 between Newport Pagnell Cazoo roundabout, (previously known as Land Rover roundabout but actually called Tickford Roundabout) and Chicheley. He reported that this stretch has now been ‘cleansed’, a term used by the MKCC officer responsible he explained. There are plans to do further stretches of the road which will necessitate traffic management. The ward councillors are leading on an initiative to clean up parts of Olney and will be organising community litter picks on the first Saturday of every month, starting on 4th March and meeting at 10am in the Market Place. Tea and coffee will be provided free of charge by The Cherry Tree for all volunteers, he said. He thanked Judy Spencer, who already organises a group of regular litter pickers, and said there was an opportunity to work together. Regarding the much discussed Aldi application, he said Historic England had requested a report from Oxford Archaeology, as evidence of a Roman building had be found on the site. Until that report is published the planning application will be held in abeyance by the planning officers. They will then make a recommendation to MKCC planning committee whether to grant or refuse the application. He stressed that the decision will be made purely on policy and not public opinion. The fact that the application conflicts with the Olney Town Council (OTC) Neighbourhood Plan (NP) and MKCC’s own policies means that it will have to go to the committee. Regarding the NP, he reminded councillors that it designated the site of ‘the Old Youth Club’ in East Street as a new health centre. Contrary to what has been said in the press and elsewhere it has NOT been confirmed that it will not be built. It was disappointing that after 12-18 months of work put in by the ward councillors to ensure an option for the land purchase from MKCC that things had stalled. They were continuing to work with the practice, the Integrated Care Board (which replaced the Clinical Commissioning Group) and the member of Parliament to ensure that the scheme moves forward.  He then moved on to the much discussed issue of changes to the bus service. He said the ward councillors had been speaking with the Britannia bus company who had now submitted their plans to MKCC, West Northants Council and Bedford Borough Council to run a two hourly service starting in early April using two single decker buses, to include diversion through Olney and Lavendon. With two other attempts having fallen by the wayside, this would seem to be the best chance or reinstating the service, he said. It would be incumbent on the travelling public to use the service to ensure its long-term sustainability, since Stagecoach already operate on part of the route. The ward councillors would continue working with Britannia to ensure that the service starts as planned and to support the long-term viability.  Next on David’s list was a meeting that the ward councillors had attended with MKCC regarding the new waste and recycling service which is due to start in September. An announcement had been made that sacks would be provided to those properties deemed unsuitable for the multi-wheelie bin proposal. A postcode check will shortly be available on the MKCC website where residents will be able to identify the proposals for their property, with an option to appeal if they do not agree.  Next David spoke about an incident on the ‘One Stop’ zebra crossing where a pedestrian had been injured. Improvements had been made some years ago to improve visibility and lighting, but the ward councillors felt that it could be made safer still and have arranged a site visit with the MKCC Head of Highways and await the police report before deciding on the next steps. Deirdre Bethune thought that the lit posts were more of a hindrance than a help. The brightness of the lights actually made it difficult to see pedestrians waiting to cross. Colin Rodden said he thought there were too many bollards. Several other members then related their own experiences of near misses on the crossing.  Finally, David reported that MKCC would be making £50,000 available to be distributed amongst parishes for the King’s Coronation. There would also be funding available from the National Lottery, he said.  Regarding litter, Colin Rodden asked what was happening to tackle those causing the problem, noting that there was a particular problem around the benches by the war memorial. It was great that the community was being urged to clean up but he felt that education was equally important. At this point Deputy Mayor Debbie Whitworth left the meeting in some obvious distress. David continued, saying that 80% of litter in MK was takeaway food packaging and waste discarded from vehicles. He said a trial of technology already in use elsewhere in the country is due to take place later in the year in MK using number plate recognition technology. Debbie Hall then returned to the subject of the number 41 bus and speaking with barely concealed anger she said she would like it to be put on record the amount of work that Debbie Whitworth has put into resolving the situation and suggested that was the reason she had left the meeting. She had arranged meetings with all parties involved, including MKCC, and David had made no mention of this in his report, said Debbie H. David said he was more than happy to acknowledge the work she had done and apologised if that had not come across. Returning to the litter issue Dan Rowland agreed it was good for the public to be involved but questioned if MKCC’s cleaning contractors Serco could do more. Peter Geary said that councils were being asked to take on extra responsibilities with less money and the budget is therefore severely stretched already. Chris Tennant returned to the subject of the new health centre, saying that as landowners MKCC had the ability to ‘unstick’ the project which was currently stuck due to a funding issue and asked if MKCC had any capital funding which could be used for this. Peter Geary responded saying there is, but it wouldn’t get the funding over the line as there were lots of things that have happened, lots of things that currently aren’t happening and some of the things that Chris had mentioned were part of it but there were other things as well and we will just have to wait and see what happens, but he was confident that Olney would get its new medical centre! The Elephant In the Room was probably in grave danger of disappearing up its own backside after that very clear and concise summary of the situation, thought Mercury. Although nobody appeared to want to acknowledge it, it was clear that the funding the practice had expected to get from the CCG and subsequently the Integrated Care Board has not been forthcoming and therefore the project has stalled. Peter continued by saying he thought the funding would come from a range of sources, but it was difficult to talk about it in public when agreements first needed to be reached in private. Colin Rodden said he was disappointed with progress since it had been known for a long time that Cobbs Garden would not have the capacity to meet the forecasted demand. The Neighbourhood Plan had been in place for some time, he said. Peter said that Chris Tennant was working with the surgery and the right people to get things moving but MKCC had no control over the Integrated Care Board. Previously, Milton Keynes had its own Clinical Commissioning Group, but the new Integrated Care Board was now responsible for Milton Keynes, Luton and Bedfordshire so suddenly there were many more GP practices and things were being dragged in numerous ways.
    PCSO’s report
    There was no PCSO present and no report this month. 
    Expenditure report
    Mayor Ben Brown presented the report saying that there was nothing unexpected this month and the council was on course for a small surplus at the end of the Financial Year.
    Reports from External meetings
    Town Clerk Jane Brushwood reported that she, Ron Hall and Debbie Whitworth had attended the waste and recycling meeting mentioned earlier by David Hosking. She had noted some interesting statistics: MKCC currently processes 38,000 tonnes of recycled waste and 36,000 tonnes of black sack waste each year. They have purchased 300,000 new wheelie bins of which 100,000 are already in use and the electric vehicles that will be used in the future for collecting bins will be powered by the waste that they collect. The recycling plant is currently powered by generating electricity from the collected waste and in the future this will be used to charge the electric vehicles. She reported that she’d also been to the Emberton Park Liaison User Group where the proposals to make part of the circular roadway pedestrian only had been discussed. The Adventure Cycles that were trialled last year are due to be reinstated on a permanent basis from Easter. Ben Brown reported that Debbie Whitworth had attended the reopening of the Oxfam Bookshop following refurbishment and he had officially opened the Community Fridge (he confirmed that the light did indeed come on). It was something that the community could be proud of, he said, and is available to anyone who wants to use it to reduce food waste.
    Section 106 allocations
    Town Clerk Jane Brushwood reported that she had shown the MKCC ‘Section 106 lady’ around the refurbished Multi Use Games Area (MUGA) on the recreation ground who was impressed with the work and the fact that it is regularly used by a range of different groups and S106 funding will be made available for resurfacing of other areas, including the driveway to the allotments.
    Recreation ground and volunteer scheme
    Ben Brown said that the now fully functioning council CCTV was working well in conjunction with the CCTV operated by some of the sports clubs. He expected to shortly start forward planning for the expected influx of summer visitors. Ben thanked the volunteers who had helped last year and asked the members to encourage anyone they knew who might be interested in helping this year to come forward. 
    Talk with your councillor and Community Events
    The Clerk said she and Mary Prosser had attended a series of presentations by the National Association of Local Councils (NALC) and had been particularly impressed with the session on Community Enrichment. Woughton Community Council do some fabulous work, she said, and felt that the Olney Centre could be used as a facility for residents to come and talk to the council, but also to run things like a youth club, adult social care tea and chat and similar. She asked for permission to further investigate the possibilities. Jane Varley said in principle it was a brilliant idea and in the past OTC had held a weekly surgery but there was very low take up. Consultations on specific issues, such as Johnsons Field development and Yardley Manor Community Centre were well attended though. Peter Geary said the ward councillors currently hold a monthly surgery and attendance is variable. The OTC office is open during the day and residents can contact the clerk or councillors via the phone or email, so the council is already pretty open, he thought. Debbie Hall said it was a shame that the youth club had closed in East Street but understood that it had been run largely by volunteers. Peter Geary said he had been a trustee for a few years and past councillors Steve Clark and Jeremy Rawlings had sat on the management committee for some 30 to 40 years. While there had been paid full and part time youth workers there with volunteers it had been fine, but the full time employee had then been spread across several other clubs but eventually there were not enough volunteers or trustees to carry on, so it had ‘fizzled out’. A similar situation had occurred at Lavendon, he said. The Clerk asked if it would be possible for OTC to pay for a part time youth worker. Peter said there were youth teams at MKCC that could advise. It was agreed that Jane would investigate and report back at a future meeting.
    Civility and Respect Protocol
    Ben Brown presented a 10 page document produced by NALC which gives guidance on how councillors and officers of the council manage their working relationship. The Clerk said that it had been discussed at one of the NALC presentations and she felt that OTC should adopt it. Peter Geary said it fitted with the Nolan Principles (of public life) which all councillors had signed up to anyway and added flesh to the bones of what the council should be doing. There had been some recent changes to standards rules and members’ register of interests which could be included in training when the opportunity arises, he said. Ben proposed that it was adopted, David Tyler seconded and it was passed unanimously.
    Coronation Celebrations
    Ben Brown said that since the last meeting Buckingham Palace had released details of the guidelines for events over the bank holiday weekend. Monday had been proposed as a ‘volunteers day’ he said and invited suggestions as to what could be done in Olney. He noted that other organisations and businesses in the town were looking to put on events. Colin Rodden asked if the council needed to make a budget allowance and Ben said there is a grant available from MKCC but members needed to bear in mind what had happened with the application process for last year’s jubilee celebrations! The Clerk suggested using social media to find out what residents want and Peter Geary agreed, saying if people wanted to close their cul-de-sac for a street party, for example, then OTC could advise on how to do it. Debbie Hall suggested that residents could clean their street signs or perhaps weed the areas outside their properties. Dan Rowlands asked if the council would be organising events or facilitating events for others. Playing devil’s advocate, Ben wondered whether the council could justify a ‘big money event’ in the middle of a cost of living crisis. Dan suggested forming a sub-committee to collate feedback from the community which he would steer, and that was agreed. Colin Rodden wondered whether the Market Place should be pedestrianised for the day for the retailers to ‘put something together’ but it was pointed out that closing the Market Place was very unpopular with the traders. Peter Geary suggested buying some new flags as the existing ones were dirty when they’d been put away in the shed and hadn’t got any cleaner when they were pulled out 10 years later! 
    Cycle and footpath links to surrounding villages
    The Clerk reported that she had received an email from Emberton Parish Council to consider using Section 106 funding to improve the footpath and cycleway connectivity between Olney, Emberton and Sherington. Emberton P.C. does not have any S106 funding available and wished to use some of that allocated to Olney, she explained, but she didn’t think it would be possible to use S106 for such a project, particularly as footpaths and cycleways were the responsibility of Highways. Peter Geary was of the opinion that Olney already had good links with Emberton via the existing cycle path and Emberton Park. The cycle path continued to Alban Hill and then shared the road to Sherington Village, which he admitted was not ideal. There is an existing path to Weston Underwood and a right of way to Clifton Reynes, which only left Lavendon with no connectivity and unless they could find £1M would not happen. He suggested working with Emberton P.C. to see what ideas they might have and how much it was likely to cost. He agreed to speak to the chair of Emberton P.C. Chris Tennant noted that in and around Cambridge the council had reached agreement with farmers to segregate vehicular and pedestrian/cycle traffic by ‘jumping’ hedgerows and locating cycleways on the edge of fields.
    Local events
    The Cherry Fair committee have requested permission to use the Glebe Field between 23rd to 26th June although it wasn’t stated what date the event would take place. The Lions have requested use of the Market Place on Sunday 11th June for Motorama. The Olney Group (TOG) have requested use of the recreation ground for Riverfest, including the raft race, on 1st and 2nd July, with parking on the Nursery field. All requests were granted.
    The next meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 6th March, at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Mercury issue for April 2023 (March 2023 meeting)
    Intro
    What’s a fiver worth these days? A pint of beer, according to Councillor Chris Tennant. That’s what he wants to charge people to park their car on the recreation ground’s Nursery Pitch on East Street. It’s small change to most people you’d have thought, and hardly worth any consideration. Not a bit of it at Olney Town Council’s monthly meeting – that fiver took up more discussion time than any other topic on the night’s agenda.
    Public participation
    The public seating area was quite busy – eight members of Olney’s populace had braved the wind and turned up for the meeting and, as it turned out, three of them were up for speaking. First came former councillor Kevin Viney who was angry that Cobbs Garden was ‘bursting at the seams’ and no longer taking any new patient registrations. He linked it to the explosion of new homes in the area and on that point he added he was disappointed that plans for a new ‘health hub’ in the town were not going ahead. He asked that OTC writes to Milton Keynes Council to convey ‘dismay’ at this decision. With just the merest of glances in the direction of Ward Councillor David Hosking – who was due to present at the meeting later – Mr Viney added that he thought Olney townsfolk would like to see the ward councillors, and our elected MP for that matter, all ‘doing something’ about this health situation regularly, and not just near election time.  Mr Viney was followed by two more public speakers; teenagers who wanted to show their support for the proposed redevelopment of Johnsons Field. They had turned up with dad Martin Mayes. The likeable pair told councillors how much they enjoyed skateboarding and were looking forward to the new development. They spoke well about how the sport helps their physical fitness as well as their mental well-being. Personally, said one of the lads to a hushed council chamber, skate boarding makes me feel free and alive. It reduces stress and stops me having any worries I might have, he added. There was hardly a dry eye in the house and the boys rightly received a round of applause from councillors as they sat down. Thanks for that, said Mayor Ben Brown, we will keep you updated on Johnsons Field. Well done for coming in to speak, he added, you spoke a lot more sense than some people do. Ben kept his gaze downwards at that point to avoid glancing at anyone and giving away who he was thinking of. You can go now if you want to, said a smiling Deirdre Bethune to the two boys. She had clearly had a quick glance down the agenda and knew that this was hardly going to be an evening of fun and laughter for a couple of teenage lads. We’ll stay for a bit, said Dad, the boys want to see local democracy in action. Hmm… you had to admire their enthusiasm. I’ll try to keep this as interesting as possible but feel free to leave at any time – we won’t be offended, reaffirmed the Mayor.
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Peter Geary, Jane Varley and Debbie Whitworth had sent apologies. Trevor Aldred was also absent from the meeting. Any declarations of interest, asked the Mayor. Ian Stokes said that a later item about parking on the sports ground might affect him as chairman of a local sports club. The minutes from the meeting held in February were duly approved.
    PCSO’s report
    Local PSCO James Andrew was on hand to deliver his report personally and asked if everyone around the table had seen his latest crime figures. There were nods of agreement. So were there any questions, asked the officer. David Tyler wondered how to report badly parked cars on zig-zag lines outside schools for example. Not to me, said James. It’s MK Council’s responsibility where zig-zags are concerned – we only do unnecessary obstruction of the highway. Colin Rodden raised the subject of cars sticking out from their parking bays along the High Street. At least that stops them parking on the pavement, said Deirdre. Well, some vehicles do both, returned Colin. As long as those cars are not bringing traffic to a complete stop, said James, there’s nothing we can do about it. Colin also asked about speeding issues in Olney. PC Andrews said there have been talks between the local police and the Thames Valley Force about bringing Community Speedwatch (where local residents use police equipment to do their own monitoring of roads) into the area. He said he would report further when he could. Ben thanked James for all the work that he does. Recreation ground marshals are due to meet soon as the spring and summer seasons approach and Clerk Jane Brushwood invited the PCSO along to the next meeting of the group to support the volunteers in their roles.
    Ward Councillor’s report
    David Hosking was again in attendance to present the ward councillors report to OTC. With local ward councillor elections looming in just a few weeks, David was anxious to show support for OTC, its local initiatives and the town in general.  He first wanted to cover the ‘Bins on Tour’ event, held at the Olney Centre. David made it sound like a grunge metal concert. The subject of wheelie bins has been trundling along for some time now and lots of people had come out to talk and make their views heard, he said. Everyone was respectful toward MKCC’s officers, regardless of their view of them, and he was pleased about that. One thing I will say, said David, is that the bins are coming, rightly or wrongly, and we will be working hard to make sure that people who can’t store them will have coloured sacks provided. ‘Rightly or wrongly’? That certainly didn’t make it sound like David was 100 per cent behind the wheelie bins idea. He added that he’d spoken to the council’s ‘waste team’ and, given the number of people who had attended the ‘Bins on Tour’ meeting and the types of questions raised, they will provide a report about the whole rubbish situation moving forward.  David also told councillors that a ‘stage 3’ road safety audit is planned for the troubled zebra crossing near the One Stop store on Olney High Street. MK councillors do think that the crossing could be made safer, he said, but it’s important that safety officers do their work with a comprehensive review of road safety measures before any proposals are made. For anyone who drives on the A509 between the Chicheley Hill roundabout and Sherington High street will notice it’s now litter free. Councillor Hosking said that the section would be closed overnight for a week in late March to allow for safe litter picking. Other roadworks will be carried out near the roundabout while it’s closed, he added. He then went on to talk about school places. Ousedale School, he said, had been massively over-subscribed for this year’s Year 7 entry in September. Because of this many children from the surrounding villages have not been offered a place at either the Olney or Newport Pagnell campuses. It’s the first time that this has happened he warned. Although it won’t affect Olney children this year, he added, it might be worth thinking about for future years.  It took a little longer than hoped, said David, but a retail forum and networking event for retailers was organised at Olney Rugby Club. It was organised by an group called Collaborate UK and supported by the ward councillors as part of their backing of local traders and hospitality suppliers. David also reported that MK Council had set their budget for the 2023/24 financial year and that it included a 4.99% increase in council tax. He was sorry to announce that no provision for a new rural bus service had been included in that budget. Councillor Hosking said that a community litter pick had proved highly successful with ‘an army’ of litter pickers collecting more than 30 bags of rubbish. Trash was collected from various areas of town but mostly to the east of the High Street. Talking of community spirit, David thanked David Phillipson and his Pancake Race committee for another successful event and congratulated Deirdre Bethune for completing the course and Eloise Kramer for winning it. Naomi Brock said she was concerned how long it had taken for any movement on the High Street crossing, because every day there is an issue there, including a near miss for herself recently, she said. Will someone have to be killed before something gets done, she asked with exasperation evident in her voice. Well I certainly hope nobody is killed before something gets done, countered Councillor Hosking. He said he was recently nearly hit by an HGV truck that had ignored the red lights outside the Bull Hotel further down the High Street. The point he was making was that these things happen on light controlled crossings as well as zebra crossings. He was confident that road safety officers would be starting investigations and reporting on the crossing in the next few weeks and everyone should wait for the report so that they have some findings to talk about. I’m sorry if that’s a bit of a non-answer, he added. Deirdre said one of the easiest places to cross the High Street was near the old NatWest Bank where there is an island. That’s where she always crosses, she added. Could a ‘splitter’ island be installed by the One Stop crossing, she wondered. Even looking at something like that slows traffic down, she said. But David wasn’t going to be drawn. I’m not a professional on this he said, and I want to wait for that report to come. Colin Rodden asked whether OTC could launch a campaign to encourage people to use the town’s bins more and thus reduce litter. Debbie Hall said the state of the town’s rubbish bins was a cause for concern and could be putting people off using them. Are they ever washed, she asked, they are disgusting. The Clerk agreed that they could all do with a scrub down and added that she would like to get the whole lot of them cleaned but it’s not easy to get that done. Perhaps it’s something we could have sorted for the Coronation, proposed Debbie. The lustre was starting to wear off for the two teenagers and dad Martin had seen the warning signs. The boys had started to get fidgety (and who can blame them?) and so they thanked everyone and left straight after David Hosking’s presentation. Perhaps they sensed that it wasn’t going to get any better than that. If we insist on talking about bins, that’s what’s going to happen, quipped Ben. 
    Expenditure report and budget to date
    There was no unexpected expenditure said the Mayor. Income from the Olney Centre is up, he said, and generally the council are tracking for a small surplus for this financial year. A wall at the back of the playground in the pre-school collapsed recently, said the Clerk. It was during the Christmas holidays when there was nobody about, she said. It could have been bad, she added with a shiver, you don’t want to see the pictures – it’s really scary. That will cost £16,000 to repair, she reported. It can’t be covered by insurance and just goes to show that you can’t take anything for granted in terms of expenditure, said the Mayor. The Clerk said OTC are hopeful of covering the expenditure through S106 funding (money for community projects). 
    Councillors who represent at external meetings
    Did anyone attend any meetings, asked the Mayor. Ian Stokes said that he and the Clerk had been to a meeting with the Football Association, the Football Foundation, local councillors and turfing specialists. It was about promoting how local councils offer facilities for sports. Applications for grants from the Football Foundation have been opened up to parish councils now, said Ian, to help provide more sports facilities and with upkeeping them. The Mayor and Mary Prosser had attended the Pancake Race, said Ben, and he was delighted with the way it went. It’s a good advert for the town, he added. The Mayor, Naomi Brock, Debbie Hall, Mary Prosser and Debbie Whitworth all attended the grand opening of the community fridge, the facility behind the Olney Centre. Donations have mainly come from residents – with not much from shops so far, said a disappointed Clerk, but the service is proving a very popular way to cut waste. Have my five jars of gherkins gone, asked the Mayor, who’s a big fan of the pickles. All gone, confirmed the Clerk. People will take anything, said Ben.
    Update on S106 spending
    The Mayor confirmed that feedback received from residents about the Johnsons Field proposals had now been collated and will be sent to the relevant MK Council department so that it can be added into the final proposals for the planning application. There is clear messaging from these comments said the Mayor. The Clerk reported that resurfacing is planned to take place at the allotments, the MUGA (multi-use games area) and the East Street car park entry road including re-marking of parking bays and disabled bays. 
    Updates on the Recreation Ground
    The Mayor said the Rec’s volunteer marshal group will be meeting later in the month with the target to get as many people involved as possible. It has to be well manned to be effective, said Ben. There will be advertisements going out to attract new volunteers, he added. He said that the issue of parking enforcement in the area had been raised, particularly in the summer months when it gets very busy. Ian Stokes wanted to raise an issue: have we got plans for disabled parking there? It’s in the plans, said the Clerk. As part of the re-lining work down there it will include disabled spaces. We did re-marking temporarily last year and it worked, she said. How do we enforce that, pressed Ian. Preparations were being made and lines for the bays will be properly painted and marked out, said the Mayor. Watch this space, he said, pleased with his irony. We could produce cards for volunteers to put on people’s cars asking them to park considerately, said Debbie Hall. Can we do that, asked Naomi, incredulously. Can we actually do that? There were nods around the table that suggested they could. Yes that’s one for the volunteers said the Mayor. I don’t think there’s anything off the table in terms of what we can do for enforcement. David Hosking said he would consult with his ward councillor colleagues on ways to enforce parking regulations while, on the subject of volunteers, Ian Stokes said there should be a JUG (Joint User Group) meeting to encourage people to volunteer for marshalling duties. The Mayor said the local Olney and Clifton Fishing Club has been doing some more testing of the water that runs through the Rec area. The river, especially down by the Victorian bathing steps, is a popular attraction but samples had confirmed that water pollution is a problem there.  The Clerk said she would like to organise some signs for the area to discourage swimming down there. Colin Rodden said the council should ’push back’ and find out why water companies, farmers and other industries are polluting the waterways. We have a duty of care to inform people about the water, said the Clerk and if we don’t and people get sick, they can come back at us about it. Yes we should challenge the water companies about it, said David Tyler. Ron Hall agreed. This is a national problem and it’s a disgrace, he said. The fishing club are continuing with their testing, said the Clerk. They are doing the swimming steps and a bit further up and I have asked them to let me have a report on it. They will do it for us and we will contribute towards the cost, she added. And would you like us to ask for you officially to do that, asked the Mayor. No, said the Clerk, I didn’t ask, I just did it, because I think it’s important. OK, said the Mayor, clearly not in the mood to continue with that conversation. The Clerk also thought the extra signage was important. Debbie Hall wondered what words can be used on any signs. How do you define ‘dangerous’, she asked. It’s dangerous because of the reeds and the foam in the water and all the rest of it, but this is pollution, said the Clerk. Could we perhaps have a colour coded system, said Dan Rowland, a kind of red, amber, green, so people can judge the toxicity for themselves. That suggestion sounded complicated and the total silence in the room that followed it did nothing to encourage its deployment. The Mayor agreed that measures should be looked at that discourage people from entering the river, a view shared by all around the table.
    Requests to use areas for parking for Rugby 7s and Olney Open Garden Events
    Various requests have been made to use the nursery pitch at East Street for car parking for these two important events. The Rugby 7s events has previously been marshalled and controlled by their own organisers, said the Mayor. Ian Stokes said that parking for long periods can compact down the earth which can affect the pitch. They have also requested parking on the strip of land outside the football club, said the Clerk. But I don’t think you can do that when that area is used by visitors.  Colin Rodden remembered past events in that area where visitors have parked badly in surrounding streets and ‘across residents’ drives’. Is there anything we can learn from those events, he asked. Nobody else thought the Rugby game would have that same impact though.  Chris Tennant brought up the subject of charging for parking in that area to ‘remunerate the potential impact’ of cars stopping there and the resultant repairs. This subject has come up before and is always hotly discussed. He suggested levying ‘the price of a pint’, £5 for each car. It would only be right and proper he said. The main problem with that is that cars then spill out onto the surrounding roads because people don’t want to pay for parking and although it’s only five pounds, most people don’t carry cash any more, said Naomi Brock. Ian Stokes said they have to be consistent. We don’t ask people to pay when the Raft Race is on, he said, so why would we ask when it’s the Rugby?  Dan Rowland asked Chris why OTC had not considered charging before. We have never been that commercial, was the quick reply. Naomi thought that people will try to park in the Rugby Club car park which is free, and fill it up. It is a well-attended event, said Chris with a shrug of the shoulders.  On they went: Do we need to charge £5 or can it be a smaller sum? What sort of damage does parking do to the pitch surface? How will the £5 charges be collected? Who’s collecting the money? The questions continued as the minutes ticked by. Eventually the proposal to charge £5 to park at the Rugby 7s event was approved. And so it started all over again… The Olney Open Gardens had also requested to use the Nursery Pitch for their event this year. It will be especially busy in the town that weekend as it clashes with the regular Motorama event down at the Market Place.  Should we charge for them to park there, asked Debbie Hall, adding that while the rugby club will be making money from their event, the Open Garden was for charity. Are all groups equal, she asked. We should talk to the individual clubs first before we just say, here’s a charge, said Ron Hall. There is an environmental impact here and the £5 levy offsets that impact, said Chris Tennant. I don’t know why the Open Gardens need parking, said Deirdre. It’s not that big a thing unless there are a lot more gardens this year. Yes but Motorama’s on the same weekend, said the Clerk, that’s why they think they won’t be able to get parking around the town. Why don’t they change the date of their event, posed Ian Stokes. The gardens will still be there, he added with a degree of logic. No, said Deirdre, bringing Ian firmly back to earth, it’s linked to a national thing, working with Willen Hospice.  OTC voted to allow the Open Gardens to use the pitch as a car park but it did not agree to charge the £5 levy – that was voted against. It was a close thing though – the Mayor having to us his casting vote to say no.
    Other matters
    The Mayor thanked ward councillors for their grant of £150 towards the forthcoming Coronation’s flags and bunting. The interim audit report was received with thanks to Deputy Clerk Rob Mungham for his work. Coronation celebration plans in Olney were discussed. There will be celebrations in the town on the Saturday including big screens showing the ceremony at Olney Baptist Church, while tea parties, lunches and a ‘Big Help Out’ of sign cleaning and litter picking will also take place. The resolution to participate in a ‘Sister City’ programme with Olney, Illinois was signed by the Mayor. And a request for new signage for three houses along Aspreys was received. Councillor Hosking said he would raise the issue with MK Council as signage is their responsibility.
    The Mayor
    Ben Brown confirmed that this would be his last meeting as an Olney Town Councillor as he no longer lives in their area. That makes him ineligible to stand as a councillor. He thanked fellow councillors and wished them well. Ian Stokes led the applause and gave praise from councillors for Ben’s work saying everyone recognised all the work he had put in.  Ben had enjoyed his time in office and would be taking some good memories away with him. A fiver for his thoughts…
    The next meeting
    The next meeting will be on Monday 3rd April at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or at any time the Mayor deems appropriate, please contact the town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Mercury issue for May 2023 (April 2023 meeting)
    Preamble
    Prior to the formal opening of the meeting Milton Keynes City Council (MKCC) Ward Councillor Peter Geary noted that the first item on the agenda was ‘To elect a Chairman’. This item was necessary following last month’s resignation of Mayor Ben Brown. Peter observed that more correctly it should be ‘To elect a mayor’ since it was not possible for the meeting to take place without a mayor. While most members present probably assumed that Debbie Whitworth would chair the meeting as the Deputy Mayor, Peter pointed out that this was only possible when the deputy was substituting for the incumbent mayor. Without a mayor the meeting would have to be adjourned, he said.
    Election of new Mayor
    Town Clerk Jane Brushwood opened the meeting and asked if there were any nomination for the role of mayor? Dan Rowland nominated Debbie Whitworth and there being no other nominations Debbie was formally adopted as mayor. She later signed the declaration of acceptance of office but declined to wear the chain of office.
    Public participation
    Local resident James Cooper spoke on the subject of the expansion of Olney without adequate infrastructure being in place. James said he was concerned to read in The Phonebox that Milton Keynes has withdrawn the promised funding for the new doctors’ surgery and that there is a shortage of places at Ousedale School. Milton Keynes had forced the town to accept the building of 400 new houses which equates to 1200 people, 300 at least of which would be children, he thought. With the existing surgery having now closed its list it is time for Olney to stand up to MK and say enough is enough until funding can be found to put things in place and stop exploiting Olney, he said.
    Apologies for absence, declarations of interest and matters arising
    Apologies were received from Debbie Hall, Ron Hall, Chris Tennant and Ian Stokes. Ward Councillor David Hosking had sent apologies although not strictly necessary as he attends in his role of Ward Councillor and is not a member of OTC. Note: Trevor Aldred was not present, having recently submitted his resignation from the council. No declarations of interest were received.
    Ward Councillors report
    Peter Geary gave the report in the absence of David Hosking. Council Standing Orders do not permit discussion of items raised under Public Participation unless they are a formal agenda item at the current or future meeting but on this occasion Peter used the Ward Councillor report to respond to the points made by James Cooper. He said neither Milton Keynes Council (MKC) nor central government dictated that Olney should take additional housing. Referring back to the Neighbourhood Plan (NP) referendum in 2017, he expressed his opinion that ‘Olney’ was the place that had decided to accept additional housing. Many months before (six, nine, 12 months he suggested) MK had set a target for growth outside of the urban settlement, including Woburn Sands, Hanslope and Newport Pagnell, which more than exceed that figure. Olney did not have to expand; it chose to expand he said. He said he didn’t want to go through the arguments again as it was ‘quite difficult for certain people at the time and raised the temperature a lot’.  Some of the warnings that people made at the time may or may not have come true, he thought. The lack of school places is not due to expansion but a ‘birth blip’ and some other issues that have cropped up. Normally some children go to schools outside of MK or to the private sector but for whatever reasons that has not happened this year. There are 26 children within the catchment area that have not got a place at Ousedale but none of them are from Olney parish although seven are from Lavendon. The line for the catchment area runs through the middle of Lavendon so currently some children who have been together at Primary School are currently due to go to Ousedale and some to Stantonbury. There are others from North Crawley, Sherington and Stoke Goldington equally impacted, he said. The ward councillors have met with the MP and Head of Ousedale to try and find a resolution, but the school is not prepared to exceed the cap on the entry numbers on an ongoing basis, although it will do so this year if three additional teaching staff can be recruited. Olney Middle School has been able to cope with ‘the blip’ by providing additional classes for the year groups affected but those classes are not full.  Dan Rowland later noted that there was some Section 106 money which had been allocated to education and wondered how much and what it had been spent on? Peter could not remember the figure but thought it in the region of £2M and said it would have been split across MK College, the university and all three schools but it was unlikely that it could be spent to alleviate the current blip. He suggested that the Development Group ask for a report from MKCC on how the money was being spent. Moving on to the doctors’ surgery, he said that MKCC had never agreed to fund it, apart from a contribution from Section 106 (Planning Gain) which comes from the developers, not the council and the cost to build the new surgery will be many times that amount. At the time there had been ‘positive talks’ with Milton Keynes Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) but that had since merged with Bedfordshire and Luton to form a new Integrated Care Partnership (ICP) and since then things had become much more difficult. There are other issues going on at the surgery which need to be addressed but which he could not talk about he said. The existing building is insufficient for the needs of the community as it has the highest ratio of patients to floor space anywhere in the area and if money cannot be found from the ICP it will have to be found from elsewhere. Returning to the issue of the ‘One Stop’ pedestrian crossing where there had been recent reports of some pedestrian near misses, Peter said a safety audit had taken place both during the day and at night and the report completed. However due to the forthcoming MKCC elections on 4th May it had been embargoed under purdah rules as it could be construed as an election issue. Nothing will happen until after the election which he thought extremely disappointing, particularly as the report had been available for publication a week before the start of the purdah period. Colin Rodden noted that when the crossing was originally installed MKC Highways had said it was the safest design possible at the time so he was not sure how it could now be made safer. Regarding the proposed Aldi development, Peter said the archaeological survey of the discovered Roman remains and subsequent report had been completed and the decision now rested with the MKCC planners. The developers will now decide how they wish to proceed and MKCC will then decide whether or not to grant planning permission. The option of displaying the mosaic under a glass floor in the store was not possible since the current design locates the car park over the mosaic. This would mean changing the design and he thought the construction of the shop over the top of the remains would be considerably more detrimental. He hoped a decision could soon be made as there is without doubt a desire in the town for an Aldi. Colin Rodden asked if there was anything that OTC could do regarding the mosaic, presumably with regards to preserving or displaying it. Peter said that OTC can request permission to speak at the meeting of the Development Control Committee where the application would be discussed and make their views known. He suggested the council discuss it at a future meeting and decide what they would like to happen. Deirdre Bethune questioned Peter’s assertion that it was ‘Olney’ that had decided to take the additional housing by voting in favour of the Neighbourhood Plan. She said OTC was only told that MK would already reach its target growth without additional housing in Olney at a very late stage in the process of producing the NP. OTC had observed what was happening elsewhere in MK where parishes were having additional housing ‘put upon them,’ and having been told to put a development plan in place decided to go ahead and plan for housing where they thought it would be suitable. It wasn’t a case of just wanting more housing but having prepared the NP to include infrastructure that was expected to be in place, such as the new surgery, it seemed the best decision to go ahead with the plan to include additional housing. Peter said he completely agreed but wanted to get rid of the myth that Milton Keynes dictated that Olney must have additional housing. Colin Rodden recalled that at the time OTC was told there would be development in Olney with or without an NP. Peter agreed but said it was a matter of scale and came down to a decision of whether Olney wanted 100-150 houses or 350. Jane Varley observed that the eventual number was actually 457 and Peter replied that there were lessons to be learnt from that since some of those had been built on land that had been identified in the NP for employment use, but the developers had successfully appealed, overturning objections from OTC and the refusal of planning permission by MKC. Where land is allocated for development and is not developed for the intended purpose, i.e., employment, then it automatically reverts to housing and that should have been considered in advance, he thought. 
    PCSO’s report
    There was no PCSO present, but a report had been provided for February and March. Mostly the figures showed no change or a slight decrease in each category although Mercury noted an increase from three to six in cases of Stalking and Harassment. Criminal Damage had risen from one case to four.
    Expenditure report and budget to date
    The Clerk presented the final report of the Financial Year, saying that there was nothing unexpected this month and the budget was pretty much on track. There was a large outgoing of £24,418.05 for the resurfacing of the allotment track but that would be returned from S106 in the next F/Y. A similar situation exists for outgoings to the Tennis Club and for the Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA), Jane said.
    Reports from External meetings
    The Clerk and Debbie Whitworth had attended the Parish Forum. The Bucks Fire rep had reported that the average callout rate for July is 41 events but last year it had risen to 220.
    Section 106 allocations
    As mentioned before the allotment lane has been resurfaced, although installation of speedhumps is outstanding. Resurfacing of the track beside the MUGA is in progress and the delayed final surface and marking out of the MUGA was due to take place over the Easter Bank Holiday. 
    Applications for Accessibility Fund
    The Clerk said she had received a request for a section of additional pathway to enable easier access to Johnsons Field. Debbie Whitworth said she would be investigating this and noted that previous applications to MKCC had been successful, such as the dropped kerb outside Out of Office. She said she had placed an article in The Phonebox inviting residents to come forward with other ideas.
    Coronation Celebrations
    The Clerk reported that she had applied for grants from MKCC which had been verbally agreed. There will be a public screening of the Coronation ceremony in the Baptist Church on the Saturday. Street parties will be held on the Sunday. The Scouts, Guides and Brownies will all be involved in ‘The Big Clean-up’ on Bank Holiday Monday. Peter Geary said that the community litter pick which David Hosking has been leading for the last couple of months will also move to the Monday.
    Merging of Planning Sub-committee and ODG
    The Planning Sub-committee and ODG (Olney Development Group) will be merged into one, since many members sit on both. There was a long discussion around about what the new committee should be called and eventually Peter Geary suggested the name Development Committee, since it would deal with applications that needed to be dealt with immediately plus the long term vision. He noted that the current ODG membership contains some people who are not councillors and therefore would not have a voice on planning matters. Colin Rodden was concerned that including the word ‘Development’ might suggest that the council was in favour of the town ‘growing like topsy’. Dierdre Bethune responded that the term Planning implied a subsequent development and suggested members were overthinking the matter.
    Odds and Sods
    A volunteer marshal meeting has recently taken place with another due to take place at the end of April. There will be ongoing appeals for more volunteers in The Phonebox and social media.  FoLiO (Friends of the Library in Olney) requested a grant towards their summer entertainment (usually £100) which was agreed.
    The next meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 15th May, at 7pm in the Olney Centre, the previous two Mondays being Bank Holidays. This is known as the Annual Meeting where elections to the role of mayor and make up of sub-committees, amongst other things is agreed. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    The Annual Town Meeting
    The annual Town Meeting will take place on 19th May where the council will report to residents what it has been doing over the past year and what the plans are going forward. Residents can raise questions and have their say on matters which are of concern to them.
    Mercury issue in June 2023 (May 2023 meeting) and The Annual Town Meeting (19th May)
    Intro
    It was a big night for Olney Town Council at May’s monthly gathering – the election of the town’s Mayor was on the agenda, as was the prospect of a new Deputy Mayor, and the room had a positive buzz about it as councillors came in and took their places. But with those two key appointments in the offing, the night wasn’t going to pass without a high-profile resignation too.
    Public participation
    Only one member of the public had taken his seat on one of two rows of chairs placed around the official meeting table, and he indicated he did not wish to address the council. But wait a minute, someone else appeared at the last gasp and sat himself down in the far row of public seats – it was Peter Geary, a long-standing and hard-working Olney town and Ward councillor. It seemed slightly odd that he chose to sit there but maybe he just needed some space. Perhaps he had heard that fellow councillor Ron Hall had recently recovered from Covid and didn’t want to get too close to him. Oh well, each to his own and nobody seemed to take much notice at this point.
    Election of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor
    This appointment has to happen every May, regardless of the length of time the current incumbent has been in office. Debbie Whitworth had only been keeping the seat warm for a matter of weeks, after Ben Brown had quit and left town, so in theory, we were facing the potential of Olney having three Mayors in as many months if someone new got the nod. It was the Mayor’s post to fill first and Debbie Whitworth duly called the meeting to order and asked for nominations for the post. Dan Rowland said he would like to propose Debbie and, as there were no further suggestions the job was hers if she accepted it. Of course she did and gleefully signed the declaration of office or, as Town Clerk Jane Brushwood cheekily put it, she ‘signed her life away’. Next up was the post of Deputy Mayor. Any nominations? Up stepped Dan again: I nominate Colin Rodden, he said. Any others, asked the Mayor. Mary Prosser put Debbie Hall’s name forward. Both nominees accepted and so we went to a vote. Now don’t expect any Eurovision Song Contest-style voting committees or brightly lit, computer-controlled results boards here. At OTC they do it the old fashioned way – a bit of paper. Round the table the slips went for each councillor to write down the name of their chosen favourite. But here’s where it got interesting. Someone passed a slip to Peter Geary who refused it. I have resigned, he said. Cue hushed silence as everyone waited for an explanation. It hadn’t been this exciting since Liz Truss stepped down as PM. There are too many meetings held locally on the first Monday of the month, said Peter, and I can’t be at all of them. He attends several parish meetings during the month and he had reached the point where he ‘has to be in other places’, so the decision was made to resign. Business had to continue, even after that announcement, and the Clerk looked at the collected scraps and declared four for Colin and six for Debbie Hall which meant that Debbie was declared the new Deputy Mayor. Did she accept? Absolutely, she said with a smile and received a warm round of applause from everyone, including Colin. Debbie H was handed her official chain upon which she gazed with awe and amazement. Made from pure gold, it’s worth a few bob. That’s a Consort Chain, said Deirdre Bethune as if trying to take some of the shine off the prize, not a Deputy Mayor’s Chain. No matter, Debbie H loved it and held the item in her hands like she was never going to let go. She would have to do so eventually, of course – it was destined to be returned to the council’s safe.
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Councillors Ian Stokes and Jane Varley were unable to attend on the night and there were no declarations of interest. In fact, the silence that followed this particular item on the agenda was about to set a standard for the night, because very little else on an agenda containing more than 20 items, brought any input or involvement to speak of, from anyone around the table. Perhaps councillors were trying to work out how they were going to cope with the prospect of the two most senior members of their committee both being called Debbie.  Or maybe they were still reeling from the Peter Geary bombshell.  Nevertheless that’s how it panned out – until Mercury was given his marching orders under an exclusion clause on the basis that publicity would be prejudicial to the public interest because if its confidential nature. But more of that shortly.  The minutes from the last meeting in April were approved by all and we moved into Annual Business. There were no comments made about receipt of the minutes from the last meeting of various committees such as Finance, HR and Planning. There were numerous items on the agenda such as review of delegation arrangements to committees, terms of reference, appointment of members to committees, review of standing orders (council rules, not the bank instructions), review and adoption of financial regulations, review of inventory of land, council subscriptions, the complaints procedures and council policies, but nothing produced any debate or dialogue of any great note. Everything is ticking along quite nicely at OTC it seems. There were further items concerning payment schedules, the AGAR (annual governance and accountability return) and approval of the council’s bank signatories but again all of this – much of it red tape to be fair – was nodded through with alarming speed.
    Press and Public Exclusion
    It was at this point that the press (Mercury) and public (Peter Geary and the other member) were excluded from the meeting because of a confidential matter, so that wrapped up business as far as Phonebox was concerned.
    The next meeting
    The next meeting will be on Monday 5th June at 7pm in the Olney Centre, If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or at any time the Mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.


    THE ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
    The Annual Town Meeting took place on 19th May in the Olney Centre, and an Open Forum, where the public can speak, was included. The Mayor’s report takes up a large part of these proceedings. Debbie Whitworth started by thanking outgoing Mayor Ben Brown and also paid tribute to councillor Trevor Aldred, who has also resigned. OTC is looking for a new councillor and anyone interested is encouraged to talk to current members. The Mayor’s report ran through many of the items and activities the council has been involved in during the last year. They included the Community Fridge which was opened in February, the resurfacing of the lane to the allotments, CCTV at the Recreation Ground and the Market Place, remedial work at the MUGA (multi use games area), bay marking at the East Street car park, river monitoring at the Rec, traffic speeds and SIDs (speed indicator devices), the AG250, Jubilee and Coronation celebrations, sistering with Olney, Illinois, the Yardley Road Community Centre and the on-going Roman mosaic situation at the new Aldi store. She says new things for 2023-24 will include a refurbishment of the Olney Centre, new play areas for the town, refurbishment of the Rec toilets, new water fountains and new bins for the High Street.  Olney has entered the Best Kept Village competition and, with the Olney Open Gardens in June, the Mayor said she was hoping the town would continue to look ‘blooming’ lovely. There was also a Thames Valley Police Report, reports from the town’s Finance, Olney Centre Management, Development and Recreation & Services committees followed by brief summaries from the Ann Hopkins Smith, Cowper & Newton Museum, Newport Pagnell and Olney Lions charities and the Ward Councillors. 

    Mercury issue for July 2023 (June 2023 meeting)
    Preamble
    The public attendance at the June meeting of Olney Town Council (OTC) was the highest that Mercury could remember, with people standing crammed against the walls and tumbling out of the doors! Town Clerk Jane Brushwood announced that the council chamber was only insured for 25 people so the majority would have to leave, which they did, although there were still well in excess of 25 people present, including the council members. Mayor Debbie Whitworth opened the meeting, reminding attendees that members of the public could address the council for a maximum of 3 minutes each, but the total could not exceed 15 minutes. If any group wished to speak on the same subject, she said they should select an individual to speak on their behalf. From the ‘public gallery’ ex-councillor Paul Collins raised a point of order that it could be extended beyond 15 minutes at the mayor’s discretion, but Debbie said on this occasion she would stick to 15 minutes.
    Public participation
    Local resident Mr Cooper spoke on the subject of the Roman Mosaic on the proposed Aldi site, which he felt was of national importance. The proposal to rebury it would be stupidity, he said, and was like ‘putting a box over the Tower of London’. For the loss of two parking spaces the developers could install a Perspex viewing window so that it could be appreciated. As far as he was aware nobody had invited the local schools and residents to visit the site. He asked who present had seen it? (nobody raised their hands). How many people knew about it? (nearly everyone raised their hands). He asked for a public meeting to discuss the options. This was an agenda item later in the meeting. Next to speak was Mr Mason, regarding the ‘One Stop’ pedestrian crossing. There had been a recent low speed accident where a lady had been knocked over on the crossing. The driver had not seen her crossing, he said. He was reluctant to let his own children use the crossing and there was general confusion when traffic in one direction stopped but the other did not. And only that day a pedestrian had been clipped by the wing mirror of a car that did not stop. Milton Keynes City Council (MKCC) Highways Dept claimed that the public had objected to the installation of an audible pelican crossing, but the pelican crossing by Midland Road was near flats and elderly residents’ accommodation and there didn’t appear to have been any complaints. Does it need a death before action is taken, he asked? Next to speak was Paul Collins expressing his surprise and dismay that OTC had served Caveman Conditioning with a 28-day notice to quit the former Olney Town Football Club building on the recreation ground. When he had been on the council there had been a ‘tsunami’ of emails in support of Caveman when its future had previously been under threat, he said. He presented what he believed to be a timeline of events:  
    • November 2022: Recs & Services committee agrees to appoint an Agent to negotiate a new rent and recommend that £50,000 be allocated to carry out repairs to the building during fiscal year 23/24.
    • January and March 2023 – no mention of this item on the Recs and Services agenda.
    • April 2023 Finance Committee agrees to appoint property solicitors.
    • May 2023 Olney Town Council agrees to serve a 28 day notice on Caveman to quit its premises.
      The normal course of events would be a series of updates by the Recs and Services Committee, followed by a recommendation to the full council. It would appear to be a failure of governance and transparency, he said, and questioned whether ‘the smell test’ had been passed? He asked that legal action be suspended, in view of the strong public interest, and the item placed on the agenda of the next full council meeting. The paper presented to the council last month in the ‘Confidential Items’ part of the meeting be made public together with the Letting Agent’s report. He expressed the opinion that given the short notice, OTC appeared to have fi rm plans for the building and invited them to share their thoughts with residents. Next up was Corina House, also on the subject of the Caveman eviction notice. As a resident of Olney, Corina expressed her concern that the 28-day eviction had been served without providing proper rationale. Firstly, when members of the community had written to the council, they were told it was for Health and Safety reasons and that the owner, Stuart Dorrill, had been informed. This was incorrect, she said, as Mr Dorrill was not informed that this was the reason for the eviction notice, and she wondered why residents were being told that this was the case. Secondly, she asked what are the health and safety concerns? The last report completed for the building did not highlight such health and safety concerns, and Olney Town Council has not, as far as she was aware, been into the building since, or requested any further assessments, so what are the council basing this on? Where is the evidence for such significant concerns that it is necessary to evict a business with 28 days’ notice, a completely unrealistic timeframe to re-model a business, putting the livelihoods of those who work there at risk and causing distress to the hundreds of members. How is this in the best interest of our community? There has been no engagement here with either the owner of Caveman Conditioning, its employees, or with residents who use the facility, she believed. Corina said she understood that the council are also telling residents that it would be inappropriate for the council to discuss a private business matter in public, but they cannot disagree that there is significant public interest here, and it is their duty to address this transparently. It appeared to her that the decision to take such drastic action against this local business, without proper consultation, or consideration for the impact on the employees and the community, is a grave mistake and has potential to damage community confidence in Olney Town Council. She asked that the council please reconsider their action, conduct their business with fairness, transparency, and compassion. Finally, Matt Chandler spoke on behalf of Olney Town Colts Football Club. He said the decision to issue the eviction notice had absolutely nothing to do with the Colts. There had been a lot of ill-informed and unhelpful speculation on social media regarding the future of the building. The building in question is attached to the Colts’ building but they have no interest in it and suggested that any further questions are addressed to the council via the correct channels, rather than social media. At the end of this section Mayor Debbie Whitworth thanked everyone who had spoken but reminded those present that subjects raised in the open forum and not on the agenda do not warrant an immediate response. It is not a discussion forum, merely an opportunity for residents to have their say, and the open forum was therefore closed. She invited everyone to stay but predictably only a handful of the public remained.
    Apologies for absence, declarations of interest and matters arising
    Apologies were received from Debbie Hall and Ron Hall. Nobody declared an interest in an item of this month’s agenda. Chris Tennant said that he had declared an interest on an item at last month’s meeting, but the minutes had not recorded this correctly. For information, the published minutes now record that during the Confidential Items part of the meeting (when public and press are excluded) the Caveman Conditioning eviction was proposed and agreed and ‘Cllr Tennant declared an interest on this agenda item, as a paying member of Caveman Conditioning, therefore abstained from voting’. Colin Rodden asked that the minutes be amended to state that the reason for the eviction notice was on Health and Safety grounds, which was agreed.
    Ward Councillors report
    Keith McLean gave a brief report, saying that very little happens in May in terms of MKCC June meetings, due to the changes in the council. The much-discussed reinstatement of the 41 bus has started and, although it does not directly affect Olney residents, from July the 21 bus will go through Emberton again. There was good news regarding the rejection by Ousedale School of the applications for 25 students from the surrounding villages. The school had that day issued a statement saying that they would be offering places to all students on the waiting list as they were able to put on an extra class. A group of travellers had been moved on from Sherington using an interim injunction, he said, and MKCC were seeking an injunction to ban that group of travellers from the city forever. Ward Councillors Debbie Whitworth and Peter Geary would be meeting with the MKCC Head of Highways to discuss the safety of the One-Stop crossing but the recent audit had found ‘nothing significant’. Naomi Brock asked if it would be possible to see the results of the audit and questioned the findings since she lives on the High Street and sees the problems every day. Keith replied that he hadn’t seen it either but thought that the contents would be revealed at the meeting with ward councillors later in the week. Colin Rodden expressed the opinion that a major contributor to the issue was speeding, since he had personally clocked speeds of 50mph when participating in Speedwatch.  
    Update on the Roman Mosaic site
    Tony Williams from Angle Properties had been invited to speak at the meeting. There had been a lot of misinformation, both online and in print so he wanted to set the record straight with the facts, he said. He started by explaining the timeline of events, starting with the granting of outline planning permission for the whole of the site in December 2018. It was granted subject to eight conditions, but archaeological investigation wasn’t one of them, which he considered to be an error by MKCC. Tony said he then proactively contacted the MKCC Archaeological Officer and along with his archaeological consultant agreed a way forward outside of the planning condition discharge, since there wasn’t one to discharge. A way forward was agreed by all parties in December 2020 and in June 2021 Angle put forward a ‘watching brief’ scope as part of the infrastructure phase which included the access road, drainage, and other aspects. Oxford Archaeology undertook the work, and some very minor artefacts were found and donated to MK Museum. In October 2021 Angle submitted a written scheme of investigation to MKCC for the area which had been identified as archaeologically sensitive, which was approved, and it was under that investigation that the mosaic was discovered in February/March this year. From that it could be seen that Angle had done things entirely properly and the accusations that had been flying around, including an article in The Phonebox, about not following policy were entirely incorrect. All documentation is publicly available on the MKCC Planning Portal, he said. Following the discovery of the mosaic Oxford Archaeology prepared a report and several site meetings were held with interested parties, including Heritage England, to discuss the way forward. It was then that the ‘preservation in situ’ option arose as that is the established policy in this country under the government’s National Planning Policy Framework and also locally under Plan MK and the adopted Olney Neighbourhood Plan (NP). The drainage and landscaping design has been changed to avoid potential damage. Full recording and documentation of the mosaic is taking place and a detailed display provided on site, the details to be decided if the outline planning permission is approved. The current plan is for the mosaic to be re-exposed for public viewing, probably in the late summer, and then immediately covered up for preservation. Ian Stokes asked why couldn’t plate glass be put over the mosaic and left on public display? Tony said only a small part had been displayed and further excavation risked causing damage. It is not in very good condition, lacking the ‘wow’ factor, he said, and there was a strong risk of damage from the water table. The expert advice was that only in exceptional circumstance was preservation with display achievable. Colin Rodden remarked that Angle had ‘done really well’ out of Olney by building Sainsburys and also over-riding the NP by building 40 additional residential units on land that had been earmarked for retail use. Was he hinting that there was an element of Karma to the predicament that they now found themselves in, wondered Mercury? Tony said there had been considerable misinformation on that issue since it was well known that Aldi had a desire for a presence in Olney for some time, but they had made it clear that they didn’t want to be located behind Sainsburys on a country lane. When the Planning Inspector granted planning permission for the McCarthy Stone residences, he particularly acknowledged the fact that no mainstream retailer would be interested in that location. Dan Rowland asked if the forthcoming outline planning application would include public consultation on the future plans for the mosaic or would it be behind closed doors? Again, Tony said all of the information was live on the Planning Portal and OTC would be consulted as part of that process. Chris Tennant said that OTC had received notification of the amended plans but suggested a more proactive Public Relations approach from Angle.
    Recreation Ground matters
    Ian Stokes announced that Olney Town Colts FC had received a grant of £73,000 over the next six years from The Football Foundation for incremental maintenance of the Nursery Field pitch and improvements to the turf and soil, but it comes with conditions on usage, six monthly inspections and groundsmen’s qualifications. All of the money will come back into the town to pay for work that the groundsmen are already doing, he said. Town Clerk Jane Brushwood said that more volunteers were needed for the summer patrols as the 16 current volunteers were mainly councillors or members of council staff. Spartan will be returning for regular security patrols. Naomi Brock wished to raise the issue of the Caveman Conditioning eviction notice under this agenda item, but Debbie Whitworth replied that it was not on the agenda and could not be discussed, particularly as the Caveman members had left the meeting. Chris Tennant asked when would the council be discussing it? Debbie Whitworth said it could be on the agenda for the July meeting or Chris could call an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) if two other councillors supported the proposal. Jane Brushwood said the council could not revisit the decision to evict for six months and the matter was now in the hands of solicitors. She emphasised that the building is falling down, is unsafe and is a liability. The future of the building should be discussed at the Recs and Services meeting, she said, and it would not be fair to carry on discussing it without the interested parties being present. Chris thanked Jane for the timeline of events that had been sent to the new councillors to bring them up to speed and said that it was such an important matter it warranted an EGM. Dan Rowland agreed, saying the reason that the council had got into the current situation was down to a lack of communication, albeit unintentional. Deirdre Bethune noted that subsequent to the eviction notice the owner of Caveman had been invited to meet with the clerk and mayor but had not responded and she suggested that the EGM should not take place until after that meeting. Although Chris had put forward the proposal it was not voted on and it was agreed that he would put forward the proposal with the support of two other councillors ‘through the right channels’. The next meeting will be held on Monday 3rd July at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.     
    The Next Meeting                       
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 3rd July at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.     
    Mercury issue for August 2023 (July 2023 meeting)
    Preamble
    Olney Town Council’s monthly meeting in July coincided with the first day of the Wimbledon tennis championship. It was a lovely evening and, as play continued in South London, councillors dragged themselves away from their tellies and made their way to the Olney Centre. When they arrived they found Mayor Debbie Whitworth holding (centre) court and in the mood for a Grand Slam. There was a full quota of councillors present, notwithstanding the recent resignations, and the public seating area was as packed as Roland-Garros in mid-June. You could sense that the evening was going to be a busy one. 
    Public participation
    This was the time set aside for people to have their say. Resident Ian Barnes got things underway. A volunteer marshal at the recreation ground (the Rec) he had recently posted on the Olney Noticeboard Facebook page a catalogue of issues concerning the recreation area in the hope that the public would get engaged too. He said that regrettably, there were very few comments about potential improvements that they had not already seen. The few ideas they did receive were not considered ‘satisfactory’, he added. He said he visited the East Street car park daily and feels that usage is ‘pretty light’. Shoppers leave their cars at the top of the car park he said, whereas sports people tend to go further in. He said he thought the whole issue of the car park and the Rec had become a ‘bit of a monster’ with too few marshals, a lack of police presence and people with no respect for authority. He called for temporary fencing near the river to at least be trialled for a few months.  James Cooper stood up next to address the council about the Roman mosaic find at the new Aldi site. He said that in his more than 30 years as an Olney resident, he had rarely come across a subject that has ‘disturbed’ people as much as this. We have had lots of questions he said, but not many answers and those that we have received have only come from the developers. He said Olney residents have not had the opportunity to ask their own questions directly to the developers (Angle Property). He called for a public meeting to be arranged including the developers and Oxford Archaeology (the heritage experts). He said local people wanted answers they could trust rather than hearing ‘just what people want to feed them’. 
    Cobbs Garden Surgery
    With no apologies for absence and nobody declaring an interest in any agenda items, the meeting could move on to the business in hand. There was a problem already though – the Ward Councillor’s report was next on the list but the Ward Councillor wasn’t there to speak. OK, next on the agenda should have been the PCSO’s report but – guess what – there was no PCSO available either.  The Mayor, though, had already headed that little problem off at the pass, and she elected to move item 10 ‘Updates on Cobbs Garden’ up the list so that invited experts could give a presentation on the latest news. The other items could come later. Present were Maria Wogan, Janine Welham and David Picking of the Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board (BLMKICB) who were there to give the Council an update on the current situation and future prospects for the much-loved Olney Health Centre. A briefing document that councillors had been sent earlier talked specifically about the challenges with the premises, said David Picking, and where the Care Board are in relation to it. They will answer questions, said David, but if they can’t they will take them away.  Colin Rodden wondered if the land behind the town’s fire station that had been earmarked as a possible site for a new surgery (with add-ons such as a dentist), was available indefinitely. He also noted that there was £700,000 of S106 funding (money for community projects) available and wondered if that could be used to improve the current surgery where it is sited now or put towards the proposed move to the new site. It’s our neighbourhood plan, he said so it’s important we get involved. How do we work with you, he asked.  David Picking agreed that it would be good to have a date to work towards concerning the proposed new site. Nothing has been set in stone yet though, he said. There’s no intention of losing the S106 money, he confirmed. We know we can work towards using the S106 money to create more space and facilities at the current site, he said. How would you do that, asked Deirdre Bethune. There is space that isn’t used all the time in that building, said David, particularly the front right-hand space where there’s an opportunity to create two more clinical rooms. But very much at the moment, he added, the ball is in the court of the partners at the practice. He had clearly been watching the tennis before coming to the meeting.  Ian Stokes couldn’t resist a tennis pun of his own. You said previously you had an allocated amount in your baseline budget, he said to David. That was a good one. David agreed that was the case, mainly to reimburse rent and rates. So can we actually recruit doctors, asked Ian, because they have vacancies.  Naomi Brock said she was confused on how far the current practice can go seeing as it is no longer able to meet the needs of people in the town. As it can’t take any more patients she wanted to know who was making decisions on where the practice was going next. It was proposed that a meeting should be set up between the BLMKICB, OTC councillors and the Cobbs Garden surgery partners. David agreed but said he would let OTC know when that’s appropriate as he didn’t want to arrive without having more details to bring to the table.
    Report on air quality
    I’m just going to rejig the agenda again, said the Mayor, and I’d like to invite Megan Harrison to talk about air quality. Megan, an Environmental Health officer at Milton Keynes City Council (MKCC), was visiting Olney to explain to OTC the results of the town’s recent air quality tests. She described how a test has been made at Bridge Street going into High Street South for nitrogen dioxide levels. It’s a very busy road there and articulated vehicles use it, she said, as if nobody knew that. Councillors nodded politely though. The Government has an ‘objective level’ of 14 micrograms per cubic metre for NO2 but on the High Street, the figure is 42 micrograms. This is considered to be ‘only slightly above’ the objective, said Megan. Further monitoring is going on, she added. Over the years with improvements to vehicles, national levels have come down. In Olney these levels have been at this point for nine years so testing can cease, she said.  The environment department wanted to continue monitoring but the equipment is on an unmetered power supply which means they pay a set fee to National Grid. Being metered would mean a lower electricity bill, however, a channel would have to be dug where the monitoring box is on the Church Hall’s car park on High Street South. An ‘inconvenience’ fee of £100 was offered to the church but this had been refused – the church group had asked for £1000 so it’s unlikely to go ahead now. The plan is to apply for DEFRA funding to help provide further monitoring systems in the future. So the narrow bit at Olney High Street is OK is it, Debbie Hall wanted to confirm. Yes it is, said Megan. Chris Tennant said the data was interesting and wondered if there were any corresponding studies into childhood health and related illnesses. Yes, very much so, said Megan. Whenever I feel slightly worried about Milton Keynes’ levels I look at London where it’s much worse with really elevated levels, she added cheerfully. We are monitoring here without any action aren’t we, said Debbie H. Yes, was Megan’s short answer. Debbie hadn’t finished: no matter how high levels go there’s no solution is there, because that’s a national problem. We do send our figures to the Highways department said Megan, and I know that over the years there have been a number of changes. But she didn’t elaborate on what those changes were. 
    Update on the recreation ground
    I have yet another rejig here now said the Mayor, as the agenda was metaphorically thrown out of the window for good. Ian Stokes was tasked with presenting an update on the Rec. He said that management of the ground was ‘still not working’ and said there were ‘still problems’ in terms of controlling crowds and the influx of visitors to the Rec and the river. Ian’s fed up with the anti-social behaviour at the recreational ground, such as visitors walking across the cricket pitch during a match or forcing their way into the pavilion to use the toilets. Now is the time to take some action, he thundered, or we are going to miss this summer.  Proposals have been put forward such as fencing, charges for car parking, parking permits and double yellow lines. But certain things were out of the council’s control such as charging for East Street parking. We haven’t got a magic wand here, Ian added, but we need to make some decisions quickly and not pontificate again. ANPR (number plate recognition) is another option that has been mentioned and Ian added that ‘we could put two people on the entrance gate, charging for car parking’ almost immediately on a Friday, Saturday and Sunday and that would be ‘cost neutral’, He agreed that it would then have to be backed up by parking enforcement in other areas of the town as drivers go looking elsewhere to park.  Burying our heads in the sand and sitting back doing nothing, yet again, is not the right thing to do, he boomed. There’s a mixture of things we could do here – let’s try something he said, because doing nothing is no longer an option. Naomi Brock agreed that something should be done as a deterrent and said let’s try some HERAS (temporary) fencing down near the river. That won’t work, said Deirdre, it is easily taken down by hooligans. But we can’t just sit here having these conversations without trying things, countered Naomi. Deirdre said she thought it would be ‘horrendous’ to have fencing across the Rec and was more in favour of the security personnel idea.  Colin Rodden said that introducing paid-for parking would encourage drivers, not discourage them, because ‘we would be providing a facility to people’. Security volunteers can’t enforce anything and the public know that, said Naomi. We don’t want to discourage people coming to the town so maybe we commercialise it and have ‘official’ people and ‘proper eyes’ down at the Rec, she added. Fencing was again discussed but not everyone liked the idea – security would be needed in addition, said Deirdre. Ian proposed that a special meeting of the JUG (Joint User Group) be held, followed by a public meeting of OTC, where local people can have their say, to decide the future actions to be taken on the Rec. That was agreed. 
    Ward Councillors report
    Ward Councillor Keith McLean wasn’t at the meeting but he sent his report to be read out by the Clerk, Jane Brushwood. A group of travellers had recently pitched up in Sherington, North Crawley and Little Crawley. Each time they pitch the council has to obtain an injunction to move them on, lasting only three months. Keith asked for a wider-ranging injunction which was granted for the whole of Milton Keynes district for two years. There is a power of arrest attached if they return – it’s a first for MK, he added. An update was given on the pedestrian crossing near the One Stop shop in Olney. Keith said a safety audit report had found that there were ‘no safety concerns’ with the road layout there. Keith and the Mayor met with Graham Cox, the Head of Highways at MKCC, who said he could alter the approach to the crossing by removing some of the parking bays to improve driver visibility.  The Mayor was clearly disappointed by this latest decision. I would like to add that the residents I have spoken to are obviously not happy at all, she said. Just as they were last year with the CCTV exercise. With the near misses we have had on that crossing, how can Highways deem it safe? Where we go from here, I don’t know, she added sadly. She implored residents to continue sending concerns directly to MKCC. Colin Rodden said there were £10,000 worth of SIDS (speed indicator devices) available and asked if some of those could be sited near the crossing. 
    Expenditure report
    Dan Rowland picked up on the SIDS just mentioned by Colin. Are we making use of them, he asked. The Clerk said they had used SIDS before and will use them again – 50% of the cost of the devices had been covered by a Community Infrastructure Fund. Dan also asked about the electricity bill for May from the football club building currently being used by the fitness company Caveman Conditioning. It appeared to be only partly paid, he thought.  The Clerk reported that Caveman Conditioning had paid £121 for May and ‘yet it is costing us (the council) £166’. So the town is subsidising a commercial business, stated Dan. Effectively yes, agreed the Clerk. Back to the SIDS again – Colin asked when they would be put up. We only got them a few days ago, countered the Clerk, her body language saying ‘Give us a chance mate’. Is there any help needed putting them up, asked Colin. No, said the Clerk. And where are they going, asked Colin, not letting this one go. In the areas where there are Speedwatch signs, said the Clerk.  Ian Stokes had a bright idea. Can we check out the calendar for Santa Pod events and have SIDS on the High Street on those days, he asked. It’s not just noise that’s a problem with visitors to the racetrack, he warned, it’s drivers accelerating from 20mph to 50mph up the High Street. Colin clearly hadn’t been watching the tennis that evening – he had been poring over the town’s accounts. What is this £8000 payment to the National grid, he demanded. That is to do with the upcoming refurbishment to the Olney Centre, said the Clerk. It included solar panelling and air source heat pump work.
    Councillors at external meetings
    Mary Prosser said she had been to a 25th anniversary celebration at the Almshouses where most of the trustees and residents attended. Debbie H went to the AGM of the Olney Newton Link. Debbie and Ron Hall, Colin and Debbie Whitworth went to the Armed Forces Tea at the Olney Centre. Letters of thanks had been received by the Mayor. Mary and Colin also attended the AG250 celebration event when a school from Liverpool came down to Olney as guests. Deirdre and Debbie W attended a Folk Afternoon at the Museum. And Ian Stokes logged onto a national forum on council action over anti-social behaviour. 
    New Councillor
    James Cooper, who had spoken earlier about the Roman mosaic, now stood again to ask if he would be considered as a new councillor. He spoke with great feeling about his time in Olney and his enthusiasm for joining the council. I have been in Olney for 37 years, he said, so I am ‘nearly accepted’ as a local. Deirdre slapped that one down. You’ve got to be born here for that mate, she said. James continued undaunted. I feel I need to protect Olney, he said, and I hope my experience will help the town. I have a great love for Olney and we’re lucky to live here. That impassioned speech seemed to do the trick: James was voted unanimously on to the council and asked to take his place at the hallowed table. 
    Other matters
    A Landscape Agreement was approved. A grant application from the Growing Minds charity in Olney was also nodded through. And ANPR came up again – with discussions planned for its installation at the Rec access road and car park. The Clerk was given permission to look for a new buggy for groundworks staff, considering electric vehicles if appropriate. Colin Rodden wanted to know if depreciation meant that the old buggy, which had been ‘well used’ according to the Clerk, would be written off. There’s no such thing as depreciation in council, said the Clerk, it’s either on or off the books. Colin hadn’t finished though. We need some financial planning in place for that, he demanded. We have it, countered the Clerk. We have planning for it and we have S106 money too, she said. This was shaping up like a tennis match. 15-love to the Clerk. If I can get this paid for, for free, she added, why would we use our own budget? When you say ‘free’, returned Colin, what do you mean? I mean the Section 106 money, countered the Clerk. Left and right went councillors’ heads as they followed this exciting rally. That’s not free money, responded Colin, clearly in the mood for battle now. No, but it’s there to be used, the Clerk returned again, this time with a backhand. Colin went for the lob. It’s not free money Jane, he boomed. It’s there for the whole community, and we’ve got to make sure we’re getting the best use from it. From a financial point of view – and I sit on the Finance Committee – we do need to make sure we’ve got the funds.  The crowd held its breath waiting for the ball to land. Well, if you sit on the Finance Committee you’ll know that it’s on there then, accounted for within the budgeting process, said the Clerk. It was a volley of the highest quality and the winning point.  I’m just putting it out there that we need to watch our finances, murmured Colin, realising that now was the time to back down from this particular contest. New balls, please… 
    Next meeting
    The next meeting will be on Monday 7th August at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or at any time the Mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. 
    No August meeting to report in the September issue.
    Mercury issue for September 2023 (August 2023 meeting)
    Preamble
    All ok for this meeting.
    Public participation
    A resident who overlooks Johnsons Field spoke about the residents’ concerns over the revised plans produced by MKCC (Milton Keynes City Council) for improvements to the play area. Although they support the plans to improve the play facilities for younger children, they are concerned about the potential for antisocial behaviour. The park will create a focal meeting point where there will be potential for misuse. It is a sad state of affairs that the freedom of many is limited by the behaviour of a few, but it is this minority that will make the lives of the nearby residents a misery, he said. The greatest concern is the proposed skate park which for some residents will only be 30 metres away. He said he had provided the council with a document describing exactly how much noise skating actually creates and it is surprisingly loud. The document contains details of legal noise limits for both day and night which he believed would be exceeded. The document also contains case studies where proposed and existing skate parks between 100 and 200 metres away are causing serious design and environmental impact problems. He quoted an example of a local council being served notice by its County Council to close a similar skate park because the legal noise limit had been broken. Finally, he proposed that OTC (Olney Town Council) re-visit the issue of the provision of a skate park in Olney after the failed plan at the Recreation Ground. Martin Mayes later spoke in favour of the plans for Johnsons Field. He said his sons and their friends were keen skateboarders and regularly visited larger, out of town skate parks. The proposals for Johnsons Field are much smaller and would not generate footfall from large numbers of out-of-town visitors. It would also be used by scooters and BMX bikes and combined with the fact it would be made from concrete and not steel would limit the noise generated, he thought. The health and confidence-building benefits to people with neuro-diverse needs that do not fit in with team sports are considerable, he said. He understood the previous speaker’s concerns but said he had spoken to a number of residents in the area with young children and overall they were positive about the plan. On the same subject, a resident had emailed to ask what plans were in place to maintain the new equipment, particularly as the existing equipment has been allowed to fall into a state of disrepair. They also asked that the additional traffic and parking be considered. Another resident had written to complain about dog poo (seven on the football pitch that Saturday morning) and dogs not being kept on leads on the recreation ground. There appear to be no signs for ‘stupid, inconsiderate owners’ stating that dogs must be on a lead on council land, they said, and not everyone likes dogs bounding up to them when they are playing or watching sports. Martyn Wilkinson spoke about a petition he is producing to introduce a 20mph limit on Weston Road. Vehicles accelerate up to Bay House and then have to stop due to cars parked on the blind bend but once past there they accelerate up the hill and 80% are breaking the speed limit, he thought. It would not be long before someone was seriously injured or killed. An awareness of 20mph might concentrate the mind, he thought. Surrounding counties all have 20mph zones but MKCC did not appear to want to know.
    Pat Brock
    Prior to the start of the meeting Mayor Debbie Whitworth acknowledged the passing of Pat Brock, a past member of OTC.
    Apologies for absence, declarations of interest and matters arising 
    Apologies were received from Ian Stokes. Chris Tennant declared an interest on an agenda item dealing with the former football club building, as a member of Caveman Conditioning.
    Update on Cobbs Garden Surgery
    Dr Katie Herman, GP Partner at Cobbs Garden Surgery introduced a number of reps from the practice and Patient Participation Group, including her father Chris Herman, who had previously been a GP in Newport Pagnell and had now come out of retirement to take on the role of Managing Partner, and a new GP, Dr Brady. She also introduced David Picking who is the Integrated Care Board (ICB) Primary Care Development Lead. Katie said there had been lots of changes at the surgery over the last six months which had been tough for everyone, but they now had a plan which had recently been communicated out via Facebook and the surgery website. Chris’ role is to assist Katie and Dr Brady in stabilising the practice by implementing changes to ensure the viability and strength of the surgery going forward. There has been discussion with two larger practices in MK to either merge or be taken over but neither of those would have worked in Olney’s favour so they will remain independent to meet the needs of their patients. The patient list will be opened again at the beginning of next year, she said. David Picking said his role was to support the practice in whatever path they decided to go down. It was good news but there is still a lot of work to be done and things put in place, but there is now a clear vision and path to be enacted. Chris said one of the criticisms levelled at the practice was that they didn’t keep people informed but with constant change that wasn’t always possible. Difficulties in staff recruitment had led to the merger discussions but David’s success in recruitment meant that was no longer necessary. Although there are currently locum GPs at the practice the preference is for long-term partners or salaried doctors who are committed to the surgery. Chris said he has brought in an HR/Business specialist who he has worked with before and who will work with the partners to review all staff contracts, processes and procedures and also appoint a member of staff to be responsible for the Care Quality Commission (CQC) aspects and staff training for CQC registration and what represents good practice. They would be undertaking a ‘Deep Dive’ into how the surgery works and what is the best way of servicing patients. There will also be regular reports back to OTC. Dr Brady said that as a traditional GP she was looking forward to working at the surgery and that she and Katie have very similar ideas about taking things forward. Deirdre Bethune asked about the progress of the proposed new building In East Street. Chris said they now had an agreement with MKCC to buy the land, but it had not progressed because nationally there is very little additional funding for capital projects. Chris said he felt strongly that would change and he was looking to use a small portion of the allocated S106 money to get planning permission so that building can start quickly when the funding is made available. It would only take around 15 months for the building to be operational once started, he thought. The long-term aim would then be to open up the list to surrounding villages and provide consultant led community based clinics.
    Ward Councillor's report
    Ward Councillor Keith McLean apologised for sounding very nasal as he had just returned from a visit to the National Arboretum and was suffering from hay fever! Leading on from the Cobbs Garden presentation he said he and fellow Ward Councillor Peter Geary and previous councillor David Hosking had worked with the surgery on the plans for the new surgery and it was good to hear that they were moving forward with applying for planning permission after three years of stop-start. He had expected the Market Place traffic lights to be fixed two weeks ago but they hadn’t. He’d then been told that they’d be working that very day, but they weren’t. A positive email had been received that day from an MKCC officer saying that they would be looking into the 20mph zone suggestion. Colin Rodden asked if the police would monitor compliance, but Keith replied that the Chief Constable had confirmed that they wouldn’t. Naomi Brock asked if there were any proposals for average speed cameras such as those in Turvey and elsewhere in Bedfordshire. Keith said there wasn’t and expressed the opinion that there may have been political motivation involved in Bedfordshire, for what good it had done. At a cost of £100,000 he didn’t think they would be suitable for Olney High Street, anyway. Keith said he had received several compliments about the work carried out during last month’s overnight closure of the A509 between Emberton and Chicheley roundabout, which had included sign repair and cut back of vegetation. Some repairs to Olney High Street had also taken place at the same time, he said. The number 21 bus had been reinstated but had not been reliable and there were reports of passengers being missed. Keith said he had requested a report from the operator regarding failure and also passenger numbers. It was a case of ‘use it or lose it’ he said. The delayed 53-week closure of the A509 to Junction 14 had come as a surprise to the ward councillors but as the project had now moved from the plan to the build stage there was little that could be done, he said.
    PCSO's report
    Prior to presenting the crime stats Debbie Whitworth reported that PCSO James Andrews had recently progressed his career by stepping up to Police Constable in Thames Valley Police and she thanked him for his enthusiasm, hard work and commitment to the community and said he would be missed.
    Johnson's Field update plans
    MKCC has provided OTC with revised plans after considering feedback from OTC and residents. The main change is the removal of the Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA). Chris Tennant suggested that the revised plans be presented to the community, but Jane Brushwood was of the opinion that OTC had already done that and fed back the comments to MKCC who had revised the plans accordingly. It could take ‘years’ to progress if they kept going back to MKCC with every revision, she said. The correct course of action would be for MKCC to now formally seek planning permission and residents could raise comments and objections as part of the planning process. Deirdre Bethune said OTC had spent so many years debating the skate park that it would now be the children of those who originally requested it who would be using it. We now need to get on and do it, she said. Debbie Hall said she’d listened to arguments for and against and on balance she was in favour. Members had been elected to make decisions and in her opinion they had consulted, listened to feedback and now was the time to make a decision. Chris Tennant said that OTC must make clear to MKCC that its approval is conditional on provision for future long-term maintenance. Debbie proposed that the plans be accepted, subject to a few ‘tweaks’, and the motion was unanimously approved. Minor improvements to Dagnall Road play area were also approved unanimously.
    Ex-Football Club Building
    Jane Brushwood reported that OTC had given Caveman Conditioning notice to quit the building but at the EGM in June both parties had agreed to extend the notice period by six months to 20th December. There had already been considerable council expense in terms of solicitor’s fees and there were more to come, as well as the cost of historic electrical inspections and structural inspections and reports. She said fi ve years ago it had been agreed that the tenant should only pay one-third of the commercial rate rental and pay a capped rate for electricity on condition that they completed the necessary building work, but they had not done so. They had continued to pay the reduced rental as well as only paying the electricity at the capped rate of five years ago. Also, they had only just started paying their rates bill. OTC now needed to progress the renovations themselves but the only way they could do that was to apply for community ownership funding, which can only be used for community buildings and not ‘personal businesses’. The council should start that process now and not wait until they took possession of the building on 21st December, she said. The lease for the extended six-month period had finally been written up by OTC’s solicitors, she said, but thought it unlikely that the tenant would sign it. OTC had the choice of sending it direct to the tenant or to the tenant’s solicitor via their solicitor. Colin Rodden asked if OTC still intended to go out to public consultation as to what should happen to the building i.e., renovation or demolition and rebuild? Jane said yes but thought it best to offer some realistic suggestions rather than a blank sheet, and Naomi Brock agreed. A long discussion took place on the matter but eventually it was decided that Jane would draft some proposals for comment, based on plans produced five years ago. Naomi and Chris Tenant both recalled that at the EGM OTC had stated that it would charge the full commercial rate for the duration of the six-month new lease. Jane said it had been impossible to find a surveyor prepared to quote a level for the current commercial rent. It was therefore agreed the full commercial rent set five years ago would be charged for the duration of the revised lease. David Tyler proposed that the lease be sent via solicitors which was agreed upon.
    Farmer's Market
    The present make-up of stalls means that the market no longer meets the strict criteria for the name Farmers Market. At the August market there were eight stalls which met the criteria and 22 that did not although efforts had been made to increase the number of ‘farmers’ attending. A number of other names were suggested, including Sunday Market (Dan Rowland thought this sounded like a car boot sale), Monthly Sunday Market, Olney Town Market, Artisan Market or Arty-F*rty Market! Eventually, it was agreed to carry on calling it the Farmers Market, since it is not officially registered as such. So that’s all good then…
    Section 106 updates
    Colin Rodden asked what the £100,000 expenditure on the Olney Centre had been used for, noting that the doors into the council chamber were new. Just the doors! joked Jane Brushwood. In fact, a massive amount of work has been carried out in the Pre-School, she said, including the provision of a mezzanine floor which had enabled the kitchen, stores, and office to be relocated. This had freed up more space for children, which meant more toilets were required. All of this had been completed in six weeks ready for the start of the new term. Debbie Whitworth thanked office staff Jane, Rob, Laura and Caretaker Bruce for their exceedingly hard work through much disruption, mayhem and noise without complaint. This had involved some excessively early starts and late finishes, she said. Additionally, the Rugby Club floodlights are being updated to LED with S106 funding.
    Odds and Sods
    There is considerable silting up of the River at the north end of the Goosey which slows the flow and has resulted in excessive weed and algae growth. This in turn leads to more silting up. The Environment Agency had advised that the latter can be addressed with a non-invasive herbicide. OTC have agreed to pay for the work to be carried out by the fishing club. The annual Firework Display organised by The Olney Group (TOG) will take place on Sunday 5th November. Mary Prosser reported that the care alarm system for the 12 residents of the Alms Houses was being updated but most of them now had mobile phones rather than the landlines required to support traditional life-line systems. Negotiations are underway with a company to provide a sim-card based system. There is currently a waiting list of 17 people, nine of which are Olney residents.
    Next meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 2nd October at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. 
    Public participation
    Residents were seeing red at Olney Town Council’s monthly meeting, and every public seat was taken before the meeting was started by Mayor Debbie Whitworth. So what was the cause of all the consternation? Redways – the rubicund cycle paths that are so popular in Milton Keynes but don’t seem to attract the same fanbase in Olney. But, as we were to learn later, the residents lining up to express their displeasure probably needn’t have worried. Resident Ralph Terry was the first member of the public to express his ‘deep concern’ at proposals made by MK City Council to install the cycle paths along the High Street, which he said would have severe effects on businesses and everyone in the town and cause congestion along the High Street and throughout Olney. It has been badly thought out, he said. The cycle lane would mean parking spaces would have to be taken away, which would have an effect on local shops. People will ‘go elsewhere’, said Ralph. A 20 mph speed limit throughout the town and proposals to make East Street and West Street one-way systems would do nothing to ease congestion; indeed, it would make it worse, he said. The Mayor told Mr Terry that his permitted three minutes of speaking time were almost up, so he just managed to call for HGV lorries to be banned in Olney before he sat down. Leo Murray agreed with Mr Terry that the proposals do little and asked for evidence that they would be useful. He lives on West Street and didn’t like the sound of the one-way system nor the proposed works near the road’s St Joseph’s Convent site, where redevelopment is being planned. Julia and Shaun Chapman, who live and run a shop on the High Street, asked what the purpose of the proposals is and what would they achieve. An impassioned Mrs Chapman even suggested that if the plans went ahead and parking was taken away, they would consider moving their business out of the town. Zenon Szczech was concerned that lime trees at the convent site would have to be pollarded (massively pruned) if the development work went ahead. This, he said, could affect the views of local people. He was also concerned that the Redway plans for the High Street could involve the removal of trees along the High Street. 
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Naomi Brock and Chris Tennant were not available – Councillor Tennant was representing OTC at an MKCC planning meeting. Ron Hall and Deirdre Bethune said they were on the BOFF committee, matters about which were being discussed later. Deirdre also had an interest in the Redway plans for the High Street, as she lives on the road.
    Special presentation by David Coles Architects
    At this point there would normally be a Ward Councillor’s report, but as there was no other ward councillor available to speak, the mayor said she would deliver a report later, and the meeting moved on to a special presentation by well-known local architect David Coles about the proposed St Joseph’s Convent development. David brought with him Chris Green, a town planner, to present to the council early plans for the proposed redevelopment of the convent site on West Street. They are large buildings on the site and are little used. However, the sisters wanted to retain some accommodation and the chapel. The plan is to meet the sisters’ ongoing needs with a proposed development, said David. DCa are acting directly for the convent as a charitable trust, and this is an initial consultation with no formal planning application made yet. Proposals include removing two of the current buildings, to be replaced with 11 houses, accessed by several entrances from West Street. This is a sensitive scheme, said David. It’s a low-density plan bearing in mind the local area. They will retain the style of the new homes there in keeping with existing neighbouring properties on West Street and on St. Joseph’s Close. David said they were grateful for resident feedback, which has already been received, and they had taken particular note of concerns regarding potential alternative access from Long Lane, as well as concerns regarding the potential cutting or loss of trees, a point which had been raised earlier in the meeting. David thought that would be the end of the presentation and made to return to his seat. But Debbie Hall was having none of that. Something that I think the whole town will be asking, she said, is this: is the charity off ering the land for a new doctor’s surgery? That’s not really in my remit, returned David, clearly trying not to get drawn in. I haven’t been involved in any discussion like that, but I don’t think that would work for lots of reasons. I realise it’s not your remit, said Debbie H, but I felt this had to be raised because so many people in the town will be asking themselves: why on earth is that not going to be made into the new doctor’s surgery? Silence from David. So I’m guessing this has to do with money, boomed Debbie. David remained quiet, hoping that would be that. OK, so what will be the value of those individual houses then? Debbie asked. That’s another thing that’s not really in my remit, said David, but you know, they are a mixture of three and four-bedroom houses, and you all have your thoughts on what those values might be. Our remit is not only to achieve quality for the environment but also to get the best value for the nuns: they are our clients and a registered charity, he offerred. Ian Stokes wasn’t impressed with that and weighed in with some tough quizzing of his own. In their own words, said Ian, adopting the tone of an Old Bailey barrister addressing a jury, the nuns are dedicated to the service of the poor and needy. But there’s no social housing here, no affordable housing, nothing that local key workers can afford, and I think that’s just horrendous, really. There was much nodding and agreeing around the table, much to David Coles’ chagrin. He couldn’t wait to sit down. Colin Rodden threw him a lifeline. Will this development be environmentally friendly? he asked cheerfully. Oh yes, said David, happy to be addressing a different type of question. We will be using traditional materials and modern methods of construction where it’s appropriate. And hopefully, labour and materials sourced locally. And with that he took his seat before anyone else piped up.
    Report from Community First Responders
    There wasn’t just one presentation for councillors to enjoy this month – Steven Hickman of the Community First Responders also addressed the chambers. As volunteers, they respond to medical situations in Olney and Newport Pagnell. A small team – there’s only three of them – they have spent more than 700 hours responding this year and also attend local gatherings such as Fireworks and Christmas events, taking the total number of hours’ service up to 1200. There is a cost to this, and funds come from charitable donations, and it’s not cheap – to train a new CFR costs £2,500 and regular updates and training throughout the year costs up to £300, so they are always looking to get donations. If you have any revenue streams, please let us know, Steven asked optimistically. They also do defibrillator and CPR awareness training and school visits, and Steven asked that the message was ‘put out there’ that this training was available. They are always looking for more volunteers. Ian Stokes asked if the CFRs charge for the training. We ask for donations, said Steven.
    Ward Councillor's report
    Back on to the agenda they went, and Debbie W reported directly on Ward Councillor matters on behalf of herself and the two other Ward Councillors, Peter Geary and Keith McLean. Cllr Geary has written to the Chief Executive of Milton Keynes City Council asking for a full explanation on why it’s necessary to close the A509, London Road, between Tickford Roundabout and Junction 14 of the M1 for 18 months. The Councillors have asked for improved signage in the area of the roadworks following a proposal by a resident, but MKCC has so far declined to alter anything. Regarding the buses, said the Mayor, seven bus routes remain on a ‘use it or lose it’ basis, including the 21 and 41 services. Residents are encouraged to continue to make use of these services, which will support the justification for their continued provision after the six-month funding has ended. We need the public to use the buses, or they could lose them, warned Debbie. We are four weeks in since the start of the new wheelie bins campaign, and there are still some houses that have not yet received their bins, said the Mayor. The first month of replacement wheelie bins, new waste and recycling sacks and waste collections has now passed. Some collections have been delayed or missed altogether in the opening month, and it’s up to residents to report these. The success of this reporting has been mixed, though, said the Mayor. With a month’s grace period of getting used to the new system now passed, the contractors now face the prospect of penalty charges for missed collections, so it’s in their interest to get these collections right, warned the Mayor. The proposed 20 mph speed restriction through Olney continues to be considered, with data collection currently in place on various roads around the town. The town’s speed limits are largely under consultation, she said, and there are plans for residents to be consulted. Now she moved to the Redway issue – the reason that such a large number of people had turned out to speak. The local walking and cycling implementation plan (the ‘Redway’ to everybody else) can be best described as a ‘false start’ Debbie W read out. The relief in the room was palpable, and you could see people looking at their watches, wondering if they could excuse themselves from the meeting now that that little hot potato had been laid to rest. Debbie said that, given the overwhelming negative response to the plans, the scheme would not be progressing to the ‘next stage’. She added that residents had a couple more weeks to make their views known. Offi cially, the Council voted unanimously to throw out the cycleway proposal.
    The PCSO's Report
    Nobody was expecting much here. As Clerk Jane Brushwood said, we haven’t even got a PCSO as such. PCSO Arlene (Ormston, who covers a different area) had sent in a report to the Council. It included a list of reported crimes in Olney between September and October: two assaults with injury, three assaults without injury, one criminal damage, one dangerous driving, one drink or drug driving, one drug offence, three harassment, one public order, three shoplifting, one stalking and one theft from a vehicle. Non-crime related incidents included a road traffic collision with injury and one without. We have also had vehicle theft from surrounding villages, said the Clerk, before delivering the bombshell that popular PCSO Dave Huckle was leaving the service to become a community safety officer at MK Council. 
    Updates on the Recreation Ground
    The Mayor said that this item had been put on the agenda permanently, but as summer was now over and things have ‘quietened down there’, she asked whether it could be removed for now. Ian Stokes said the Rec should be discussed at least quarterly otherwise, ‘May will come around next year, and we will have to start all over again with it’.
    Section 106 spending
    Colin Rodden asked for more detail on £200,000 that has been shown against the Olney Centre. The Clerk described how extensive refurbishment work on the Centre had been continuing with replacement windows and a new heating system that is ‘sort of in’. A pre-school stairway and more windows are due to be fitted during the school half-term week before work starts on the Clerk’s own office when she and her staff will be ‘kicked out’ and told to work in the council chambers. She added that the East Street Community Centre had been successful in receiving some S106 money, and said that she would be helping them to ‘spend every penny of it’.
    Request from BOFF for 2024
    Now, it was time for another presentation – the third of the night. Simon Timmins and Scott Rosborough from the BOFF committee explained how the event has been highly successful for the last two years. Next year, they are proposing to run the event on the 7th and 8th September, but they want permission to set up on the Thursday immediately after the Market packs up. A new comedy night is also planned for Friday (6th) evening. Debbie Hall said it would be useful because the Market Place car park would already be free of vehicles. The plan was approved by the Council.
    Updates on Astroturf project
    Ian Stokes said that a joint Astroturf project between Ousedale School and Olney Town Colts FC is about to start and will be finished by next March. The £800,000 plan means that the school will have use of the pitch during school days while OTCFC can use it in the evenings. The facility would also be available for hire. The next meeting will be held on Monday 6th November. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting or any time the Mayor deems it appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.co.uk.
    Prelude
    Ian Stokes said that a joint Astroturf project between Ousedale School and Olney Town Colts FC is about to start and will be finished by next March. The £800,000 Town Clerk Jane Brushwood opened the meeting by announcing that Mayor Debbie Whitworth was indisposed, and Deputy Mayor Debbie Hall was on holiday so, in order for the meeting to start, a Chairman would have to be elected. There was much shuffling of feet and looking at the table but, just before the Clerk sent everybody home, Chris Tennant offered his service and took his seat at the head of the table.
    Public Participation
    Andy Davies spoke on behalf of Stuart Dorrill, proprietor of Caveman Conditioning. He explained that following the EGM in June, Stuart had been pleased to receive the revised lease document for the building previously occupied by Olney Town FC in September and had responded a week later. Milton Keynes City Council (MKCC) building control had visited the site and was happy that the building was safely habitable. The Caveman team were currently in negotiations to find a new site for the business, but it was taking some time. As a result, Stuart was asking for an extension to the lease and was offering payment in advance up to February. This was the subject of an agenda item later in the meeting. A resident of Mobbs Close spoke regarding the access gate onto the East Street (Rugby Club) car park. This was also an agenda item, and she asked that any decision by the council be delayed as the residents were seeking further advice. Next to speak was Kevin Viney. Kevin reminded councillors that a little over five years ago, permission was granted for 250 new homes on what is now known as Yardley Manor. A developer is now looking to add 200 further homes on an adjacent site called Site E Extension. He believed that this was only the thin end of the wedge and Olney was being ‘softened up for more houses beyond this, which would drive a coach and horses through the Olney Neighbourhood Plan (NP) that was supposed to provide protection from such building work until 2031. The additional 1000 plus residents would place a terrible further strain on schools, transport, parking, and the doctor’s surgery which is already near collapse. It will bring noise, pollution, and disruption to those already affected by the current building work. Developers already have ‘form’ in riding roughshod over the NP breaching the allocation of commercial and retail use, he said. He urged OTC to send MKCC a robust objection to the plan and demand that they prioritise the well-being of the town over blind approval of construction projects, which overwhelmingly favour developers.
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Apologies were received from Debbie Whitworth, Ron Hall and Debbie Hall. Ian Stokes declared an interest in the item regarding the former football club building as Chairman of Olney Town Colts FC, and Chris Tennant declared a similar interest as a member of Caveman Conditioning.
    Ward Councillor’s report
    Ward Councillor Peter Geary reported on the new Milton Keynes local plan, MK2. A plan would normally cover a period of 10 years, he said, but MKCC had chosen to extend theirs to 18 years up to 2050. An extra 63,000 houses are required to be built, 20,000 of which already have permission or presumption of planning permission. MK2 is due to be submitted by MKCC in June 2025, so over the next 18 months there will be a call for sites to provide the additional 42,000 houses. Some would be in the city of MK, he said, but a significant number will be required in the rural areas. Things are likely to move very quickly, and the ward councillors thought it sensible to draw the rural parishes together. It was not possible to stop a local plan, he said, but it was important to have input to shaping it to ensure that infrastructure is provided at the right time. Chris Tennant said the OTC Development Committee had resolved to take an active role in shaping the plan and work with the other parishes, including Emberton and Sherrington, since they would all be expected to deliver additional growth. Colin Rodden thought OTC was ‘jumping the gun’ a bit as it was only a consultation and Olney might not be expected to expand. He reminded councillors that under the previous plan, Newport Pagnell had elected to build more than their allocation of houses, although the then MKC ‘didn’t know what they were doing until the last minute’. Peter Geary said that in all previous local plans the rural parishes, including the key settlements of Olney, Newport Pagnell and Woburn Sands, had been given an allocation of houses. However, Woburn Sands is now full so there will be no more development, and Newport Pagnell is not far off. James Cooper asked if MKCC would be knocking down the old Netherfields of this world that should have been knocked down 30 years ago and stick in twice as many houses? There is likely to be some redevelopment, thought Peter, but it was unlikely to be a major component of the plan. He finished by saying that there are still a few problems with the new wheely bins to be sorted out, and with the dark nights coming on urged resident to report any faulty streetlights to MKCC or the ward councillors. He then excused himself as he had to attend the meetings of Emberton and North Crawley parish councils.
    PCSO’s report
    The Clerk said that Olney does not currently have its own PCSO, but Arlene Ormston was valiantly trying to cover Olney as well as her other villages. The Clerk read out the month’s crime stats, none of which were particularly dramatic, but she noted that one of the thefts was of a Portaloo. Mercury assumed that the police were investigating but currently have nothing to go on.
    Representatives at outside meetings
    As a trustee of the Ann Hopkins Smith Alms Houses, Mary Prosser reported the maintenance was proceeding as planned, but each of the 12 residents had been delivered three wheely bins which were rather unnecessary. MKCC had refused to take them back but the trustees were forbidden to dispose of them so if anyone needs a bin. Ian Stokes reported that he had attended the Pre-School AGM and the committee wished to pass on their thanks to the Clerk for her excellent work in project managing the extensive refurbishment of the building. The Clerk reported that she and James Cooper had attended the AGM and awards ceremony of Bucks and MK Association of Local Councils, where they had accepted a long service award on behalf of Deirdre Bethune for her 45 years service to OTC. Chris Tennant presented Deirdre with her framed certificate.
    Section 106 update
    The Clerk said that refurbishment of the Olney Centre was nearly complete and solar panels will be installed shortly. The users of the centre had all been very understanding and flexible and very few sessions had needed to be cancelled. Chris Tennant thanked the Clerk and the office staff, saying that there had been times when there had been no power or heating. Colin Rodden said that the East Street Community Centre (Old Youth Club) had been allocated £15,000 of S106 funding but had not been able to use it because the age and state of the building did not meet the carbon neutrality requirements. The heating needed replacing but S106 funding would only apply for the installation of a heat pump, and the poor insulation of the building meant that it would not be viable. The Clerk explained that the criteria are very strict so the funding for renovations would have to come from elsewhere, although MKCC as owners would be replacing the windows. Colin asked if OTC could put pressure on MKCC to invest in the building, but the Clerk thought it would not be appropriate for OTC to ‘stick their nose in’ as they do not own or even run the building. It is down to the community group that runs it, she said. Chris Tennant noted that construction of the new Astro-Turf facility at the Ousedale campus, partly funded by S106 had commenced, as had the new mixed use community centre at Yardley Manor. He said the council had been approached by a developer who was looking at a short list of sites for a new open-air lido. It was a potential future project which might come in through S106, he said.
    River water pollution
    Mark Butterfield from Olney and Clifton Fishing Association gave an update on the pollution levels in the river. He said the phosphate and nutrients were now at ‘fertiliser factory’ level, leading to excessive algae and vegetation growth. The association normally spend 5–7 days a year managing the river, but this year had already spent over 100 days. One member is now qualified in weed control, he said. The main causes of the pollution is farm run-off (around 65%) and sewage discharge, and many of the local sewage outlets are not monitored. The Environment Agency have tested and claim there is not a problem, but have not provided data to back up this claim. Mark said he is testing every month, and it is clear there is a problem. He believed that traces of e-coli had also been found. Chris Tennant suggested raising the issue with DEFRA, perhaps via our MP Ben Everitt, and Mark replied that he had recently written ‘a rather nasty letter’ to Ben, which had resulted in him turning up on his doorstep. He hadn’t provided any answers, particularly when Mark had pointed out that he, Ben, had voted in favour of dumping sewage in our rivers. It was agreed to set up a working group that will report back to full council each month.
    Ex-Football Club Building
    As previously reported, OTC had given Caveman Conditioning notice to quit the building, but at the EGM in June both parties had agreed to extend the notice period by six months to 20th Dec. The Clerk said the council had received a letter from Caveman’s solicitors asking to extend the temporary lease to the end of March 2024, payment of the rent which had been agreed by both parties on the draft lease being conditional on the extension being granted. She then briefly referred to an email that had been received the day before directly from Caveman asking for a further extension. She reminded members that Caveman had only been paying rent at one-third of the commercial rate for the last five years, which equates to a loss of £42,000, which OTC could have spent on renovating the building. The council were being ‘blackmailed’ she felt. Dan Rowland pointed out that, additionally, Caveman had only been paying for part of their electricity usage. Ian Stokes said that although MKCC Building Control had spuriously declared that the building was not in imminent danger of collapse, having kicked the wall (which he likened to a mechanic kicking the tyres at an MOT), the electrical inspection had identified ed 2 x C1 defects (danger present, immediate action required), 7 x C2 (potentially dangerous, urgent remedial action required) and 3 x C3 (improvement recommended). He reminded Chris Tennant that he (Chris) himself had stated that there were parts of the building which he would not enter. Chris countered by saying that only certain parts of the building were open to the public and the dangerous area of the old changing rooms had been ‘isolated off ’. Colin Rodden thought as landlords OTC had mitigated the risks of allowing the tenant to remain and at least they were getting an income in the absence of a consultation and plan for the building. Chris then referred to the details of the recent email in which the tenant had confirmed receipt of the draft tenancy agreement three months after the EGM and stated that he had been unable to find suitable alternative premises and requesting an extension to the spring of 2024, June at the very latest. Chris said the positives were that OTC would continue to receive income while the consultation on the future of the building took place. The tenant was offering to pay four months upfront and then the previously agreed-on rent on a monthly basis until June. He suggested that a building in active use is probably better than having it boarded up and closed with the associated risk of vandalism. Deirdre Bethune said she thought Caveman was a very good business asset to the town but was concerned that having agreed on a temporary lease to December, they had asked for an extension to March and then to June. What guarantee was there that they would not ask for another if they could not find alternative premises? she asked. Naomi Brock said she thought that OTC should have issued the temporary lease immediately after the EGM in June and there had been a catalogue of errors, but the Clerk said that their solicitors were not there ‘at their beck and call’ and the period between all parties agreeing at the EGM and the draft lease being issued was reasonable. Referring back to Colin Rodden’s opinion that OTC had mitigated the risks of allowing the tenant to remain, Dan Rowland said that OTC had honoured what was agreed at the June EGM, but allowing the extension posed further safety risks which concerned him. Ian Stokes said his main concern was safety, but the residents of Olney had already subsidised the Caveman business to the tune of £42,000 in rent and were continuing to subsidise their utility bills. OTC was going round and round in circles with a tenant who time and time again over the last five years had not done what they said they’d do, he thought. Naomi Brock proposed that the temporary lease be extended on a fully repairing and insured basis to 31st March 2024. At the end of this period the tenant will be evicted, regardless of whether they have found alternative accommodation. This was voted on and passed by a majority. Secondly, she proposed that following the public consultation a plan for the future of the building be presented at the January OTC meeting. This was passed unanimously.
    Gate from Mobbs Close to East Street car park
    When the site was being built, OTC gave the builders permission to use the car park and put in a gate to allow them access to the site. When they finished, they were supposed to reinstate the fence, but it appears they didn’t, and furthermore, they gave residents a key to the gate. There is a risk of creating a presumed right of way and OTC having to maintain the area, so they are not happy and had planned to continue the shrubbery and block the access. The Rugby Club are not happy with the gate as it is very close to their changing rooms and the back doors to the clubhouse, so it has some security and safeguarding issues, particularly when women or under 18s are using the changing rooms and from dog walkers using the passageway as a short cut to the recreation ground. Having got used to using the ‘cut through’, the residents are reluctant to give it up and have asked for time to explore the options. This was agreed upon and will be discussed at a future meeting.
    Refacing the Town Clock
    Although not widely known, the clock attached to the old Nat West building, currently occupied by David Coles Architects, was paid for by public subscription to mark the Silver Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II in 1977. The South Face is considerably sun damaged, and the tenant has requested that it be replaced. The Clerk said that when he took possession of the building, the tenant had agreed to ‘look after the clock’ and maintain the electricity supply, but maintenance remained the responsibility of OTC. A quote in the region of £1000 has been received. David Tyler questioned whether a 1970-style clock was in keeping with the location of a conservation area, although admitting that he ‘wasn’t even a twinkle in his dad’s eye’ when it was installed! The consensus was not to question the historic decision to provide it. (At this point Mercury recalled the saga of the Millenium Floral Clock, which at the time was the subject to much critical discussion, with some saying it would make Olney look like a ‘downmarket seaside town’. The mechanism mysteriously disappeared before it could be installed and, despite valiant investigative efforts by Ron Hall at Phonebox Magazine, was never seen again). It was agreed to allocate some funds in the next financial year so that the town could collectively contribute to their clock from their Council Tax precept.
    Odds and Sods
    To mark the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings in 1944 the town beacon on Barnfield will be lit at 9.15pm on 6th June 2024. Next Meeting The next meeting will be held on Monday 4th December at 7.00pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting or any time the mayor deems appropriate please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Preamble
    ‘Please shut the gate’ is a sign we have all seen, and most of us will abide by that request. It’s part of the Countryside Code after all, and anyway, it’s good manners – if you use a gate, you shut it after you. So when representatives of an Olney street, which has been enjoying its own access gate, attended the regular Olney Town Council meeting to secure the opening’s existence, they probably weren’t expecting it to be shut up for good…
    Public Participation 
    June Keating from Mobbs Close in Olney stood to give her case for the access gate. She was there on behalf of her entire street although, to be fair it was only her and her daughter present so, compared with some resident rebellions seen at the Olney Centre in 2023, this one wasn’t so much ‘mob-handed’ as ‘Mobbs-handed’. She said that an access gate between Mobbs Close and the recreation ground (the Rec), which has been there for five years, had recently been ‘rather crudely blocked off ’ so that residents could no longer use it.  The gate had been damaged too, and we have since found out that it was the Town Council which did this, said a forlorn Mrs Keating. She said the gate was the property of the residents of Mobbs Close – 23 people have a key to it which is used on a regular basis for people to get to the Rec, the bowls club, the tennis club and other facilities there. She said that by having the gate operated by residents, it would only enhance security down at the Rec by ‘sort of keeping an eye on things’.  There had been a matter raised, she added, concerning the privacy of the Rugby Club’s changing rooms near to the gateway and if this was the case, surely a screen could be erected on the railings there to solve that problem. Mrs Keating said that this was a ‘trivial’ issue that ‘concerns very few people’ and wondered why OTC’s time and resources were being used here when they were ‘surely needed elsewhere’.
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Councillors Colin Rodden, David Tyler and Deirdre Bethune were unavailable. Deirdre was at another meeting – Town Clerk Jane Brushwood said Deirdre indicated that she would attend if that one finished in time. Ian Stokes declared an interest in a later item on the agenda concerning the town’s former football club building as he is chairman of Olney Town Colts, and Chris Tennant had a similar interest to declare concerning that building as he was a member of an organisation that uses it.  Just before the last meeting’s (November) minutes were approved, Ian Stokes had a question. Was it not agreed that the current tenant of the ex-football club (Caveman Conditioning) pay council legal fees? he asked. That was met with stunned silence around the table. Can you say that again, please, said Mayor Debbie Whitworth. Well, I know this was discussed because I raised it, said Ian. We were talking about incremental legal fees and whether they should be covered because they seem to be escalating, he added. The Clerk confirmed that the matter had been discussed but it wasn’t included in the resolution.
    Ward Councillor’s report
    Councillor Keith McLean was in town to deliver the Milton Keynes ward report. He had a number of items to go through. We still have problems with MK Connect (the local transport service). The issues continue, and I’m not quite sure what the remedy is, he said. The number 21 bus service was another ‘problem’ item on Keith’s agenda. People have come to me on this, he said, and last week I had two reports: one where the bus driver decided that Emberton didn’t exist anymore and went straight up the bypass and on another occasion, apparently, people were invisible at the bus stop by The Forge. For the first one, Keith continued, the bus company said, ‘Ah that’s a new driver’. I went back and said – excuse the pun – do you not ‘on-board’ your drivers and familiarise them with the technology and routes? Keith said he was aware of an App that contains this information, but he didn’t have any more details.  The ward councillor continued with his next item: the roadworks at the bottom of the A509 from Chichelely Hill. If you go past the road that you can’t go down, you will notice that there is something missing there. It’s a white elephant known as a bridge. I can’t believe they went to the trouble of putting the bridge up to save closing the road and then finding that they didn’t need it and took it down, said Keith. I hate to think how much it cost.  Next on the list was the 20mph speed limits. Following a meeting back in September there has been gathering of speed data in a number of areas, he said. There were a couple of places that he was disappointed did not get checked, for example the stretch of Weston Road between the A509 and Lime Street, even though Keith asked twice for that. But the outcome is that they are going to go ahead with 20mph speed limits on Aspreys and on Yardley Road and the residential roads going off them. There is not the budget to do any more speed restricting, said Keith, this is just Phase 1 and will be starting early 2024 and finished by the middle of the year. Part of the speed limits will involve engineering works, putting in humps on both Yardley Road and Aspreys. Keith finished with one other subject that he had discussed at ‘a number of these meetings’. The question of safety of the crossing at the One Stop shop has been raised again, he said. He explained how he had been told recently by a Highways officer that there had been agreement to put in a ‘covert surveillance device’ at the crossing to record traffic movements over a week in that area. It had to go through procurement, but it had been agreed in principle.  Debbie Hall asked Keith about the 20mph limit, which seemed to be happening only on the west side of the town. What about East Street? She asked. Keith said he did ask for the whole of Olney to be included in the research, but it was felt that there was not enough budget to do everything. He added that he thought people would be surprised at the speed of cars along East Street – it’s self-policing, he said, and in a lot of places where it’s narrow cars don’t get over 30mph. It’s done using a matrix scoring system and unless a lot of cars exceed the limit no action is taken, he explained. It also needs a pavement down there, said Debbie H, not letting the subject go.  Keith said that’s an engineering issue. Ian Stokes asked if the High Street was part of the data gathering. The Mayor said that data gathering strips had been put along the High Street and that the information has to be sent to Thames Valley Police.  Chris Tennant said he thought there was still an issue with speeding from the industrial estate at the north end of the town coming down to the roundabout at the top of Drift Way. Keith noted that there were actually no houses alongside that stretch.
    PCSO’s report
    Olney still does not have a PCSO, but some crime figures had been sent to the Clerk by Arlene Ormston, who is being ‘run ragged’ as she tries to cover Olney as well as her own villages. The Clerk had figures that covered 6th November to 4th December and included 1 x Action Fraud (of a banking protocol), 3 x public disorder and 1 x antisocial behaviour between neighbours. Other incidents that are not crime-related include some road-related issues and a suspicious person on the Market Place.  The Mayor added that she had been told there will be two new PCSOs coming to Olney: one on board in December and one coming in early January. Both new officers will have several weeks of training.
    Expenditure report
    Councillors had been sent a copy of the latest expenditure report by the Clerk. Did anyone have anything to say about it, asked the Mayor. The resounding silence meant there was no comment on what was a straightforward document this month.
    Representatives at outside meetings
    There was also little to report from councillors who had represented OTC at external meetings. Debbie Hall said she had attended a meeting of the Olney Newton Link, where they are starting a project to build a new community centre rather like the one in Olney. The Clerk said that she and the Mayor had met with Barclays Bank to discuss the provision of a new financial facility in the town. It’s not a hub, said the Mayor. No, they don’t like that word, agreed the Clerk, because it suggests lots of different banks. They are putting a Barclays van on to the Market Place twice a month on the Thursday market. There won’t be cash banking there, but there will be other things – we’ll find out soon enough. It will be starting in January, she added.  We also have social prescribers coming in. Social prescribing is sort of like a citizens’ advice, explained the Clerk, which will include advice on things like physical and mental well-being, housing, finance and heating. The council will set up a ‘coffee morning type of thing’, she added, so that people from Olney and surrounding villages in a wider area can access the service. The Council is hoping to create some advertising material about both the Barclays banking service and the social prescribers scheme. 
    Section 106 spending update
    The cemetery path said the Clerk, from the road up to the lych gate, has been surfaced and from there the existing path is going to be resin bonded again. Surfacers will be coming back to do the edges and finish the job, she added. And the top surface will not be able to be done until the weather changes in the Spring next year, she said, but it is quite safe until then. Of course that’s all being done under Section 106 funding, the Clerk confirmed. 
    River Water Pollution Group update 
    Dan Rowland told everyone that an action plan had been put forward to monitor water quality. However, he wasn’t sure what the timescale was for this research. The Mayor said that Mark Butterfield (from Olney’s fishing association) was carrying out research on behalf of OTC and had been working with Bedford Council and their scientists there. We have also asked the Clerk to reach out and work with Newport Pagnell Council, so it is like two councils working together, said the Mayor. Testing will also continue to be carried out at the bathing steps area. We will collect as much data as we can before we take the whole situation to the Environment Agency, the Mayor added. We’ll get as much groundwork in as we can. Then we will be in a better position to request full data on the river pollution and, if necessary, we can ask for an FOI (Freedom of Information) to find out exactly what the EA are testing. Ian Stokes said this must remain an agenda item for the future and one to keep an eye on, especially with the heavy use of the Rec in the summer. This report can ‘dovetail’ into that, he added. The Council can get test kits for water quality monitoring, said the Mayor. What will they be testing for? asked Debbie Hall. E.coli, said Dan. OK, so what’s the action taken from that information we receive, returned Debbie H. We can share it with other fishing clubs in the area, answered the Mayor, to understand what they are doing too.
    Update on the ex-football club
    The Clerk said the present tenant’s solicitors have agreed on a lease which she has ‘yet to see signed’. It has not been signed as far as I’m aware, she added. That’s the only update I’ve had. I’ve had other small bits and pieces, and plans are being put in place for a meeting in January. We’ll have the results of the questionnaire on Neighbourhood Planning (which includes a specific question about the building), as you know, she said. The Olney questionnaire is still live, said Chris Tennant. Yes, but only until the 15th of this month (December), said the Clerk. We’ll get that all put together and the results of that will form part of the plan, she added.
    Gate from Mobbs Close to East Street car park
    This had already been brought up by a resident earlier, and now the issue was to be discussed as an agenda item. OK, well, you all know about this because it has been going round and round, said the Mayor. And we need to make a final decision this evening. Well, just like we’ve got the problem with the football club said the Clerk, this is a problem I feel that we are going to pass on to people in the future. And it’s not these residents, it’s not necessarily us councillors, the fact of the matter is that by allowing it (the gate), we are putting ourselves at risk of being sued when the path is slippery, when the gate doesn’t work or whatever. The gate should not have been there. It should be put back as a metal fence, and there’s hedging in there – that’s what should go back in. It should have been reinstated when the builders left, but they didn’t do that. We have had a letter from the managing agent of that estate, said the Mayor. In it, she said, the agent had offered to erect some signage saying that using the gate is done at ‘one’s own risk’. I’m sorry, added the Mayor, but that means absolutely zilch. The Clerk agreed.  We all know that if someone was to slip there and crack their head open, it would be the council’s fault as it’s on council land, she said. That’s the top and bottom of it. Whether it’s in my lifetime or your lifetime or sometime in the future, it‘s a responsibility that we need to remove. Ian Stokes said he thought the council could mitigate the problem by having an agreement that people use the gate at their own risk. We have passageways throughout Olney that are exactly like that, he said, alongside Costa, alongside Allens, up to the Co-op. But they don’t belong to us, said the Clerk. The onus is on mitigating the risk; that’s my point, said Ian. I take your point about liability, but I’m talking about if the residents are signing up to use the gate at their own risk, and there’s no cost to the council for producing the signage. The point about the changing rooms is a red herring because no architect would design changing rooms that you can look into, he added. I’m with Ian on this, said Naomi Brock.  People walk in a lot of places that are OTC land and that we wouldn’t take liability for, but we have allowed people to use this, so why has the risk changed? Because we didn’t know about it before, said the Clerk. But why did we allow people to use it then, asked Naomi. Because it was put there to allow builders who were parking in our car park to gain access to the building site and were allowed to put the gate in for that, and when they finished they should have taken the gate out. Chris Tennant wanted something cleared up. So the planning permission allowed for some new fencing there, he asked. Yes, but not for a gate, said the Clerk. OK, so the council allowed temporary access for the builders and temporary use. So now we are asking, do we as a council allow unfettered access to our land? Obviously, time has gone by – I worked on the town council five years ago, and I didn’t know about it then.  One option, said Debbie Hall, is to make good the passageway and get the planning permission. Well, to do that we have to make sure it is constructed to highway standards and properly done, said Chris. It would then have to be policed, properly lit, it would need correct surfacing, and made a size and shape for all residents’ use: residents of the town and not just residents of the estate. Jim Cooper couldn’t believe that the constructors had given people a key to the gate when they finally left the site. Why did they think it was in their power to give a key when it wasn’t theirs to give, he boomed. The gate should have been done away with, and the fence should have been reinstalled. It’s not a great deal of difference walking down Mobbs Close and back onto the Rec than using the gate, said the Clerk. I don’t see why we should put ourselves up for possible trouble in the future. It doesn’t benefit the town, said Chris. If it was a big open access gate for the whole town to use, would the residents of Mobbs Close still want it? The Mayor agreed. It’s got to be for the whole town, and it’s not. As it stands now it’s on our land and if anything happens we will be liable, in spite of any signage going up about risk, so sadly, on this occasion, I propose that we remove the gate. Hold on, said Debbie H. It’s a locked gate – that’s the issue here. Does Olney Town Council hold the keys to the gate, asked Dan Rowland. No, was the answer. Chris thought that allowing the gate to remain would set a precedent for the future. The Mayor said they could not defer any longer. Will the builders have to make this good, asked Debbie Hall. No, we would just go in and reinstate the fence, said the Clerk. The proposal was made by Chris Tennant and seconded by Jim Cooper to close the gate permanently and reinstate the council’s fence and hedge to secure its boundary. It was carried by a majority. Case closed – or should that be gate closed? 
    The Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday, 8th January at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation at the start of the meeting or at any time the Mayor deems appropriate please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@ olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    -----
    Mercury's reports in our 2024 editions
    January 2024 Issue (December 2023 Olney Town Council Meeting)
    Preamble
    ‘Please shut the gate’ is a sign we have all seen, and most of us will abide by that request. It’s part of the Countryside Code after all, and anyway, it’s good manners – if you use a gate, you shut it after you. So when representatives of an Olney street, which has been enjoying its own access gate, attended the regular Olney Town Council meeting to secure the opening’s existence, they probably weren’t expecting it to be shut up for good…
    Public Participation 
    June Keating from Mobbs Close in Olney stood to give her case for the access gate. She was there on behalf of her entire street although, to be fair it was only her and her daughter present so, compared with some resident rebellions seen at the Olney Centre in 2023, this one wasn’t so much ‘mob-handed’ as ‘Mobbs-handed’. She said that an access gate between Mobbs Close and the recreation ground (the Rec), which has been there for five years, had recently been ‘rather crudely blocked off ’ so that residents could no longer use it.  The gate had been damaged too, and we have since found out that it was the Town Council which did this, said a forlorn Mrs Keating. She said the gate was the property of the residents of Mobbs Close – 23 people have a key to it which is used on a regular basis for people to get to the Rec, the bowls club, the tennis club and other facilities there. She said that by having the gate operated by residents, it would only enhance security down at the Rec by ‘sort of keeping an eye on things’.  There had been a matter raised, she added, concerning the privacy of the Rugby Club’s changing rooms near to the gateway and if this was the case, surely a screen could be erected on the railings there to solve that problem. Mrs Keating said that this was a ‘trivial’ issue that ‘concerns very few people’ and wondered why OTC’s time and resources were being used here when they were ‘surely needed elsewhere’.
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Councillors Colin Rodden, David Tyler and Deirdre Bethune were unavailable. Deirdre was at another meeting – Town Clerk Jane Brushwood said Deirdre indicated that she would attend if that one finished in time. Ian Stokes declared an interest in a later item on the agenda concerning the town’s former football club building as he is chairman of Olney Town Colts, and Chris Tennant had a similar interest to declare concerning that building as he was a member of an organisation that uses it.  Just before the last meeting’s (November) minutes were approved, Ian Stokes had a question. Was it not agreed that the current tenant of the ex-football club (Caveman Conditioning) pay council legal fees? he asked. That was met with stunned silence around the table. Can you say that again, please, said Mayor Debbie Whitworth. Well, I know this was discussed because I raised it, said Ian. We were talking about incremental legal fees and whether they should be covered because they seem to be escalating, he added. The Clerk confirmed that the matter had been discussed but it wasn’t included in the resolution.
    Ward Councillor’s report
    Councillor Keith McLean was in town to deliver the Milton Keynes ward report. He had a number of items to go through. We still have problems with MK Connect (the local transport service). The issues continue, and I’m not quite sure what the remedy is, he said. The number 21 bus service was another ‘problem’ item on Keith’s agenda. People have come to me on this, he said, and last week I had two reports: one where the bus driver decided that Emberton didn’t exist anymore and went straight up the bypass and on another occasion, apparently, people were invisible at the bus stop by The Forge. For the first one, Keith continued, the bus company said, ‘Ah that’s a new driver’. I went back and said – excuse the pun – do you not ‘on-board’ your drivers and familiarise them with the technology and routes? Keith said he was aware of an App that contains this information, but he didn’t have any more details.  The ward councillor continued with his next item: the roadworks at the bottom of the A509 from Chichelely Hill. If you go past the road that you can’t go down, you will notice that there is something missing there. It’s a white elephant known as a bridge. I can’t believe they went to the trouble of putting the bridge up to save closing the road and then finding that they didn’t need it and took it down, said Keith. I hate to think how much it cost.  Next on the list was the 20mph speed limits. Following a meeting back in September there has been gathering of speed data in a number of areas, he said. There were a couple of places that he was disappointed did not get checked, for example the stretch of Weston Road between the A509 and Lime Street, even though Keith asked twice for that. But the outcome is that they are going to go ahead with 20mph speed limits on Aspreys and on Yardley Road and the residential roads going off them. There is not the budget to do any more speed restricting, said Keith, this is just Phase 1 and will be starting early 2024 and finished by the middle of the year. Part of the speed limits will involve engineering works, putting in humps on both Yardley Road and Aspreys. Keith finished with one other subject that he had discussed at ‘a number of these meetings’. The question of safety of the crossing at the One Stop shop has been raised again, he said. He explained how he had been told recently by a Highways officer that there had been agreement to put in a ‘covert surveillance device’ at the crossing to record traffic movements over a week in that area. It had to go through procurement, but it had been agreed in principle.  Debbie Hall asked Keith about the 20mph limit, which seemed to be happening only on the west side of the town. What about East Street? She asked. Keith said he did ask for the whole of Olney to be included in the research, but it was felt that there was not enough budget to do everything. He added that he thought people would be surprised at the speed of cars along East Street – it’s self-policing, he said, and in a lot of places where it’s narrow cars don’t get over 30mph. It’s done using a matrix scoring system and unless a lot of cars exceed the limit no action is taken, he explained. It also needs a pavement down there, said Debbie H, not letting the subject go.  Keith said that’s an engineering issue. Ian Stokes asked if the High Street was part of the data gathering. The Mayor said that data gathering strips had been put along the High Street and that the information has to be sent to Thames Valley Police.  Chris Tennant said he thought there was still an issue with speeding from the industrial estate at the north end of the town coming down to the roundabout at the top of Drift Way. Keith noted that there were actually no houses alongside that stretch.
    PCSO’s report
    Olney still does not have a PCSO, but some crime figures had been sent to the Clerk by Arlene Ormston, who is being ‘run ragged’ as she tries to cover Olney as well as her own villages. The Clerk had figures that covered 6th November to 4th December and included 1 x Action Fraud (of a banking protocol), 3 x public disorder and 1 x antisocial behaviour between neighbours. Other incidents that are not crime-related include some road-related issues and a suspicious person on the Market Place.  The Mayor added that she had been told there will be two new PCSOs coming to Olney: one on board in December and one coming in early January. Both new officers will have several weeks of training.
    Expenditure report
    Councillors had been sent a copy of the latest expenditure report by the Clerk. Did anyone have anything to say about it, asked the Mayor. The resounding silence meant there was no comment on what was a straightforward document this month.
    Representatives at outside meetings
    There was also little to report from councillors who had represented OTC at external meetings. Debbie Hall said she had attended a meeting of the Olney Newton Link, where they are starting a project to build a new community centre rather like the one in Olney. The Clerk said that she and the Mayor had met with Barclays Bank to discuss the provision of a new financial facility in the town. It’s not a hub, said the Mayor. No, they don’t like that word, agreed the Clerk, because it suggests lots of different banks. They are putting a Barclays van on to the Market Place twice a month on the Thursday market. There won’t be cash banking there, but there will be other things – we’ll find out soon enough. It will be starting in January, she added.  We also have social prescribers coming in. Social prescribing is sort of like a citizens’ advice, explained the Clerk, which will include advice on things like physical and mental well-being, housing, finance and heating. The council will set up a ‘coffee morning type of thing’, she added, so that people from Olney and surrounding villages in a wider area can access the service. The Council is hoping to create some advertising material about both the Barclays banking service and the social prescribers scheme. 
    Section 106 spending update
    The cemetery path said the Clerk, from the road up to the lych gate, has been surfaced and from there the existing path is going to be resin bonded again. Surfacers will be coming back to do the edges and finish the job, she added. And the top surface will not be able to be done until the weather changes in the Spring next year, she said, but it is quite safe until then. Of course that’s all being done under Section 106 funding, the Clerk confirmed. 
    River Water Pollution Group update 
    Dan Rowland told everyone that an action plan had been put forward to monitor water quality. However, he wasn’t sure what the timescale was for this research. The Mayor said that Mark Butterfield (from Olney’s fishing association) was carrying out research on behalf of OTC and had been working with Bedford Council and their scientists there. We have also asked the Clerk to reach out and work with Newport Pagnell Council, so it is like two councils working together, said the Mayor. Testing will also continue to be carried out at the bathing steps area. We will collect as much data as we can before we take the whole situation to the Environment Agency, the Mayor added. We’ll get as much groundwork in as we can. Then we will be in a better position to request full data on the river pollution and, if necessary, we can ask for an FOI (Freedom of Information) to find out exactly what the EA are testing. Ian Stokes said this must remain an agenda item for the future and one to keep an eye on, especially with the heavy use of the Rec in the summer. This report can ‘dovetail’ into that, he added. The Council can get test kits for water quality monitoring, said the Mayor. What will they be testing for? asked Debbie Hall. E.coli, said Dan. OK, so what’s the action taken from that information we receive, returned Debbie H. We can share it with other fishing clubs in the area, answered the Mayor, to understand what they are doing too.
    Update on the ex-football club
    The Clerk said the present tenant’s solicitors have agreed on a lease which she has ‘yet to see signed’. It has not been signed as far as I’m aware, she added. That’s the only update I’ve had. I’ve had other small bits and pieces, and plans are being put in place for a meeting in January. We’ll have the results of the questionnaire on Neighbourhood Planning (which includes a specific question about the building), as you know, she said. The Olney questionnaire is still live, said Chris Tennant. Yes, but only until the 15th of this month (December), said the Clerk. We’ll get that all put together and the results of that will form part of the plan, she added.
    Gate from Mobbs Close to East Street car park
    This had already been brought up by a resident earlier, and now the issue was to be discussed as an agenda item. OK, well, you all know about this because it has been going round and round, said the Mayor. And we need to make a final decision this evening. Well, just like we’ve got the problem with the football club said the Clerk, this is a problem I feel that we are going to pass on to people in the future. And it’s not these residents, it’s not necessarily us councillors, the fact of the matter is that by allowing it (the gate), we are putting ourselves at risk of being sued when the path is slippery, when the gate doesn’t work or whatever. The gate should not have been there. It should be put back as a metal fence, and there’s hedging in there – that’s what should go back in. It should have been reinstated when the builders left, but they didn’t do that. We have had a letter from the managing agent of that estate, said the Mayor. In it, she said, the agent had offered to erect some signage saying that using the gate is done at ‘one’s own risk’. I’m sorry, added the Mayor, but that means absolutely zilch. The Clerk agreed.  We all know that if someone was to slip there and crack their head open, it would be the council’s fault as it’s on council land, she said. That’s the top and bottom of it. Whether it’s in my lifetime or your lifetime or sometime in the future, it‘s a responsibility that we need to remove. Ian Stokes said he thought the council could mitigate the problem by having an agreement that people use the gate at their own risk. We have passageways throughout Olney that are exactly like that, he said, alongside Costa, alongside Allens, up to the Co-op. But they don’t belong to us, said the Clerk. The onus is on mitigating the risk; that’s my point, said Ian. I take your point about liability, but I’m talking about if the residents are signing up to use the gate at their own risk, and there’s no cost to the council for producing the signage. The point about the changing rooms is a red herring because no architect would design changing rooms that you can look into, he added. I’m with Ian on this, said Naomi Brock.  People walk in a lot of places that are OTC land and that we wouldn’t take liability for, but we have allowed people to use this, so why has the risk changed? Because we didn’t know about it before, said the Clerk. But why did we allow people to use it then, asked Naomi. Because it was put there to allow builders who were parking in our car park to gain access to the building site and were allowed to put the gate in for that, and when they finished they should have taken the gate out. Chris Tennant wanted something cleared up. So the planning permission allowed for some new fencing there, he asked. Yes, but not for a gate, said the Clerk. OK, so the council allowed temporary access for the builders and temporary use. So now we are asking, do we as a council allow unfettered access to our land? Obviously, time has gone by – I worked on the town council five years ago, and I didn’t know about it then.  One option, said Debbie Hall, is to make good the passageway and get the planning permission. Well, to do that we have to make sure it is constructed to highway standards and properly done, said Chris. It would then have to be policed, properly lit, it would need correct surfacing, and made a size and shape for all residents’ use: residents of the town and not just residents of the estate. Jim Cooper couldn’t believe that the constructors had given people a key to the gate when they finally left the site. Why did they think it was in their power to give a key when it wasn’t theirs to give, he boomed. The gate should have been done away with, and the fence should have been reinstalled. It’s not a great deal of difference walking down Mobbs Close and back onto the Rec than using the gate, said the Clerk. I don’t see why we should put ourselves up for possible trouble in the future. It doesn’t benefit the town, said Chris. If it was a big open access gate for the whole town to use, would the residents of Mobbs Close still want it? The Mayor agreed. It’s got to be for the whole town, and it’s not. As it stands now it’s on our land and if anything happens we will be liable, in spite of any signage going up about risk, so sadly, on this occasion, I propose that we remove the gate. Hold on, said Debbie H. It’s a locked gate – that’s the issue here. Does Olney Town Council hold the keys to the gate, asked Dan Rowland. No, was the answer. Chris thought that allowing the gate to remain would set a precedent for the future. The Mayor said they could not defer any longer. Will the builders have to make this good, asked Debbie Hall. No, we would just go in and reinstate the fence, said the Clerk. The proposal was made by Chris Tennant and seconded by Jim Cooper to close the gate permanently and reinstate the council’s fence and hedge to secure its boundary. It was carried by a majority. Case closed – or should that be gate closed? 
    The next meeting will be held on Monday, 8th January at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation at the start of the meeting or at any time the Mayor deems appropriate please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@ olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. 
    January 2024 meeting (published in the February issue)
    Public Participation
    Trevor Aldred spoke on behalf of the trustees of the East Street Community Centre (previously the Youth Club). Trevor explained that the building is well utilised by about 50 groups each week, including karate, music, Zumba, drama, and others. It is run by a team of three unpaid volunteers and a modest rent is paid to Milton Keynes City Council (MKCC) as the landlords. Trevor said the heating in the building was installed in around 1966 and is now completely rugged (Mercury may have misheard this bit) and will cost around £30,000 to replace. MKCC will only assist with funding for a heat pump solution but the poor insulation and general state of the building makes this unsuitable. Trevor said he recognised that Olney Town Council (OTC) have no responsibility for the building, but MKCC had been inert, lazy, unresponsive, impolite, and unprofessional in their dealings with the trustees. The trustees have some money available, but Trevor said he thought it unfair that they should have to pay for repairs when all around were saying it was not their responsibility. As this was an item on the meeting agenda Trevor asked that the council bear this in mind in their discussion.  Mayor Debbie Whitworth said the council had received a letter from a young person who lives in the High Street supporting the introduction of a 20 mph speed limit and warning signs. It would make Olney a safer place, she thought.
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Apologies were received from Ron Hall, Debbie Hall, Naomi Brock and Chris Tennant. Ian Stokes declared an interest in the item regarding the former football club building as Chairman of Olney Town Colts FC.
    Ward Councillor’s report
    Keith Mclean gave the ward councillors report. MKCC had prepared their draft budget for the next Financial Year and Council Tax is likely to rise by 4.99%, 2.00% of which is for social care. Bids are now being invited from parish councils for their own projects, he said. Mercury assumes that this for the parish precept, the amount collected with the MKCC Council Tax which is then returned to parishes. Keith said he was shocked to receive an email stating that Willen Road will be closed for over a year from next month between Marsh End and Tongwell Roundabouts. He then went on to say that it won’t actually be closed but extensive roadworks to widen but not dual the road will be taking place which will lead to long delays, particularly as most people are using it as the unofficial diversion route to get to Junction 14 while the A509 is closed. There had been no holistic view of how to manage traffic over the next few years, he thought, particularly as the ‘white elephant’ bridge had been built over the A509 and then pulled down. There had been mixed reactions to proposals to introduce a 20 mph speed limit in the town, particularly as there was no evidence that the accidents that do occur are due to speeding, but the consultation would continue. Keith said that it was important that OTC are represented at a forthcoming meeting with MKCC planners to provide input to the impending Milton Keynes Local Plan. Over the past 4–5 months there had been a call for landowners to put forward sites to be considered for development. Although there had been changes to the National Planning Policy Framework in December Keith said he had been assured that the changes would not ‘trump’ any Neighbourhood Plans produced by the parishes. Colin Rodden asked when MKCC would be installing the posts for the Speed Indicating Devices (SIDs) that had cost OTC £10,000 and were currently sitting in boxes. Jane Brushwood interjected to say that it was in hand, leading Colin to ask when? Debbie Whitworth replied that OTC was going through the stages and Colin, clearly exasperated asked what was the problem? Jane Brushwood, equally exasperated said the problem was that OTC does not own the land that the poles will be installed on. Who does, asked Colin? MKCC replied Jane. Why don’t we put them on the lampposts like we used to asked Colin? Because we’re not allowed to and never were replied Jane. Debbie closed down the conversation saying she wanted to move on but Colin, eager to have the last word, said it would be useful to get a date. Debbie informed Keith that the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) restricting parking in Osier Way would go ahead, but the similar order for Oakdown Crescent had been delayed due to complaints from some residents of Weston Road who use Oakdown Crescent to park. Mercury was not remotely surprised to hear this as this very issue was the subject of many heated discussions at OTC meetings some years ago when a residents only parking scheme was being sought by a relative of an elderly Oakdown Crescent resident. MKCC are suggesting that the provision of dedicated disabled parking spaces goes ahead without delay, she said. There was a problem with the proposal to introduce a 20 mph limit at Yardley Manor, said Debbie, because the roads were not yet adopted by MKCC. The solution was for residents to lobby the developers to request a ‘Section 38 agreement’ whereby the developers can ask MKCC for their own 20 mph orders. If that is agreed it can be ready and in place for when the adoption takes place, she said.
    PCSO’s report
    Jane Brushwood said PCSO Arlene Ormstom had managed to get the monthly crime stats produced on her first day back after Christmas. One point of interest was the theft of a sheep from The Goosey. Other crimes included 2 x assault without injury, 1 x attempted burglary, 2 x criminal damage to cars, 2 x drink/drug driving, 1 x shoplifting from the Co-op, 1 x theft of handbag from shop, 1 x theft from vehicle. 
    Representatives at outside meetings
    Debbie Whitworth said she and Jane Brushwood had attended the Amazing Grace 250 service at St Peter and St Paul which had been very well attended. The event had included the showing of the video ‘Amazing Grace: Legacies at 250’ detailing the highlights of the year, which can be viewed via the museum website. They had both also attended a meeting of the Social Prescribers, Debbie said. There will be a drop in coffee morning on the third Tuesday of each month to link residents of Olney and surrounding villages to local services and activities to improve health and wellbeing. Debbie said she had also attended a meeting with a group that are keen to set up a ‘new vision for a youth club and crisis drop-in centre’ for teenagers with mental health issues. Since emerging from Covid Debbie said she had heard from schools and parents that many young people are having problems with their mental health, so she had reached out to Mind BLMK who have agreed to run sessions at the Olney Centre with a qualified outreach worker funded by MKCC. Jane Brushwood reported that she had attended the Christmas lunch at the Olney Centre to assist organiser Naomi Brock which had been attended by around 30 people. Lunches had also been delivered to those who could not attend. Deirdre Bethune said that she had recently joined the Cobbs Garden Surgery Patient Participation Group and reported that a new GP would be joining the surgery in January and a new partner in March. As a result, the patient list had been reopened from the beginning of January.
    Ex Football Club Building
    Jane Brushwood said a questionnaire regarding the future of the building had been included in the recent Neighbourhood Plan survey and the results had been collated and it was clear that the majority of residents want it as a community building for all to use. She presented a draft plan detailing the various stages of the project. Colin Rodden noted that the plan seemed to assume that the existing building would be demolished and replaced, but Jane said that was still to be decided by ‘the experts,’ although it might turn out to be the cheapest option. Ian Stokes agreed that the feedback showed that there was a desire for mixed community use and suggested that some preliminary work could start now, such as high level concept design and grant application. He wondered why the project currently sat with the Development Control Committee rather than the Recs and Services Committee, since it would be necessary to consult with the Joint User Group and other experts. David Tyler wondered if the Recs and Services had the capacity to take it on. Jane said that now that committee was smaller and had a chairman it took less time to make decisions, so she believed that had sufficient capacity. Deirdre Bethune said historically such projects did not sit within Recs and Services because several past councillors had also been associated with the sports clubs, implying that there could be a conflict of interests. Ian Stokes proposed that the progression of the project moved to the Recs and Services which was agreed unanimously. 
    Review of Council policies
    Some years ago the council produced policies for communications, complaints, and Co-option which are reviewed each year at the annual meeting. An additional policy had recently been produced for biodiversity. Jane Brushwood said that the size and number of the policies meant that it was too onerous for one person to review effectively so Jim Cooper and Dan Rowland had spent some time reviewing them and proposing the necessary changes. Colin Rodden was of the opinion that the Biodiversity policy was too general and did not go far enough in stating what OTC specifically was doing. Jane said that she had suggested engaging the services of an advisor to do just that, but the members had decided that the quote was too expensive and rejected the idea. Colin reminded members that there used to be a team of volunteers who worked on biodiversity projects, but the council had dispensed with them as they were not insured. Dan Rowland noted that the face to face communication section was very prescriptive in identifying negative body language (specifically, eye rolling, tutting, sighing, glaring, finger tapping, finger pointing, aggressive gesturing, and excessive sarcasm). Deirdre Bethune said it had been necessary because such behaviour had been evident from some members of the previous council. Additionally, it was agreed to change the references to ‘he/she’ to the now more commonly accepted single pronoun ‘they’.
    East St Community Centre (Youth Club) Asset of Community Value
    Background: Some years ago OTC applied to purchase the building and land from MKCC for the princely sum of £1 under the Community Asset Transfer (CAT) Scheme. The site had been registered as an ‘Asset of Community Value’ (ACV) meaning that MKCC could not sell the site to anyone else without giving OTC the option to buy it first. Since the necessary building repairs at that time would have cost in excess of £150,000 MKCC were happy to oblige, and negotiations commenced. Before the process could complete OTC allocated the site for the new health hub in the Neighbourhood Plan (NP) and intended to gift the land to the surgery. A condition of CAT is the asset must remain in its original use, so MKCC withdrew from the process. The ACV registration ran from 2017 to 2022 and has now expired. MKCC have stated that reregistering the ACV might conflict with OTC’s desire for MKCC to sell (note sell!) the site to Cobbs Garden for the health hub, because it cannot be a designated development site and an active ACV site, since it would render the site undevelopable in something of a Catch 22 situation. In 2022 MKCC valued the site at a minimum of £250,000 but stated that it could be higher if there is an uplift in the market. Jane Brushwood said that the current committee of volunteers running the building had asked if OTC could help with the required repairs to the building (as mentioned by Trevor Aldred in the public participation section) but she felt that OTC could not be seen to be spending time and money on a building which they didn’t own. However, she said she recognised that it was an important asset to the town and wanted to prevent MKCC from selling the site for any purpose other than the health hub. She said she didn’t think that MKCC had any plans or desire to sell it for any other reason than for the health hub but that could not be guaranteed. Jim Cooper said if a developer came along with a big offer, then MKCC would have to accept it. Colin Rodden wondered whether it would be possible for MKCC to transfer the building to OTC and retain ownership of the land, enabling OTC to assist with the necessary repairs? It was agreed that Jane would reopen negotiations for CAT with MKCC and look at the various possibilities, depending on the outcome of those negotiations.
    Planning application for St Joseph’s Convent
    As discussed previously, David Coles Associates architects have submitted plans to build 11 new homes on the site of the now disused convent under Application no: 23/02713/FUL. Debbie Whitworth explained that this would normally be dealt with by OTC’s Development Control Committee but they are not due to meet until 29th January and the deadline for comments to MKCC is the 27th, although under certain circumstances comments may be accepted after the cut-off date. It was agreed that Jane would speak to Chris Tennant, chair of the DCC and then respond on behalf of the council. She asked if anyone had particularly strong views on the matter and the general consensus was that no one was in favour of the development. Deirdre Bethune thought it a great pity that it couldn’t be used as the site for the new Health Hub. Debbie said that many residents had been in contact with her expressing their opposition to the development. 
    Parking restrictions at Johnsons Field
    Debbie Whitworth explained that currently applications for double yellow lines have to be submitted to MKCC as highways authority via the Ward Councillors. MKCC are now placing the onus on parishes, meaning that parish councils will provide a sanity check to requests from residents and apply to MKCC direct if they support the request. She said an enquiry had been received from residents of Johnsons Field, which is currently on hold until MKCC publish details of the revised process. OTC will then request a formal application from the residents and discuss and progress accordingly. Colin Rodden noted that if MKCC is going to invest in the proposed development of the play areas on Johnsons Field and then prevent visitors from parking nearby they are going to look ‘a bit silly’ and Jane Brushwood agreed, saying that it might lead to parking elsewhere, possibly across residents’ driveways during the school run. Jim Cooper thought that perhaps the residents were requesting the double yellow lines now in anticipation of parking problems once the development had taken place. Deirdre Bethune suggested that it might be something for the council to consider once the development had taken place and if it became an issue. 
    Odds and Sods
    Colin Rodden noted that the monthly expenses sheet included £2600 to a firm of tree specialists and asked why the council’s own grounds staff couldn’t do the work, since they presumably had chainsaw experience? The quote was for six or seven items of work which the ground staff are not qualified or equipped to carry out, replied Jane Brushwood.
    The Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 5th February at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    February 2024 meeting (published in the March issue)
    Preamble
    Thank heavens for Peter Geary. And it’s not often you’ll see those words written in the esteemed columns of the Mercury Report.  But, credit where it’s due, if it wasn’t for the hard-working Ward Councillor, February’s Olney Town Council get-together would probably have been the shortest in its history.  Or in the history of any other town council in Britain, for that matter. Even with Councillor Geary’s report included, the entire meeting lasted just 17 minutes. If he hadn’t been there to deliver his statement, the gathering would have been over like a shot.  Blink and you’d have missed it. Hmmm, now there’s a thought…
    Elizabeth Knight
    The meeting started with a tribute to the widely respected local writer and historian Elizabeth Knight who died recently. Mayor Debbie Whitworth addressed the hushed chamber with this opening announcement: “I’m sure you are aware of the sad passing of Mrs Elizabeth Knight on 17th January.  Councillors will know we wouldn’t normally mention every passing in the town, however I feel we have to acknowledge the passing of this great lady. Mrs Knight was a brilliant historian who, back in the day, ran the Cowper & Newton Museum. She had such a fascinating in-depth knowledge of our town. Liz was most helpful and supportive of the council; her suggestions for street names and the reasons why, have been invaluable. So on behalf of the council I’d like to express our sincere condolences to the family. Elizabeth was a much loved and well respected lady.” Deirdre Bethune noted light-heartedly that Elizabeth ‘considered herself a foreigner’ because she was not born in Olney. 
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    There were no requests from members of the public to speak so the Mayor moved swiftly to the agenda. ‘Swiftly’ was clearly going to be the theme of the evening.  Apologies for absence was the first item on the agenda. Chris Tennant, Colin Rodden, Debbie Hall and Ian Stokes were all unavailable. There were no declarations of interest on this occasion so the Mayor asked for approval of the OTC Meeting of 8th January (proposed and seconded by Deirdre Bethune and Mary Prosser) and an EGM (Extraordinary General Meeting) on 22nd January (Mary Prosser and Jim Cooper). Dan Rowland noted that the minutes for the EGM showed the meeting ‘ending before it had begun’. A simple typing error showed a 7.30pm start with a 6.50pm finish, when it should, of course, have been a 6.30pm start. But it brought much laughter around the table. Well spotted, quipped Town Clerk Jane Brushwood.
    Ward Councillor’s Report
    I see we have Councillor Geary here this evening, said the Mayor. Yes that’s right, Madam Mayor, came the reply and with the niceties out of the way Peter got down to the business of delivering the longest item on the evening’s agenda by a country mile. Some of you will probably know most of what I’m going to talk about, said Peter. That opener didn’t exactly ignite the flames of fervent anticipation, but councillors settled down to listen anyway. He previewed a planning meeting due later in the month (February). This is probably one of the most crucial meetings coming up, said Peter. This is the first time that Milton Keynes will grow significantly outside of its bounds since the city was first formed, so what’s coming up is pretty crucial. He went on to explain that the MK Council budget is ‘ongoing’ and there are budget consultation papers in circulation which OTC members would probably have seen, but he added that the consultation is now over. The headline fact from it is that Council Tax will rise by 4.99%, the maximum that it can go up by. When the budget went through and was put out to consultation there was £2 million of contingency left in there. In other words unallocated money, explained Peter. The money will be allocated quickly, he added, and we will see where it is going.  Moving on Peter said that within the next week or so there will be a decision made about the future of MK Connect (the transport service for residents who don’t have access to a bus). There has been talk about that service for the last couple of months, said Peter, and there was supposed to have been a decision made on its future already but that was deferred for more debate with the operator. But hopefully we will find out just what is happening with MK Connect because obviously it is quite crucial for us here and in the rural areas, he said.  There was a new set of parking charges in MK that came into effect as of 1st February, and the minimum time you can stay has been changed, he explained. So where you could have stayed for 15 minutes and paid for that in the past, said Peter, the minimum is now an hour and you pay the minimum charge for that. Thank goodness this OTC meeting wasn’t being held in MK then, or councillors would not have got their money’s worth from one hour’s parking charge. The 20mph speed zone consultation was due to start that week, said Peter, because they have to get it ‘over and done with’ before purdah (the period of time when restrictions on local councillor communications are imposed) at the start of the election period. That will run until Friday 22nd March, he added.  Peter then moved onto Oakdown Crescent in Olney where, he said, there are some issues going on there and these are being looked at by Ward Councillors, who are well aware of the situation.  Peter opened the floor up for questions or concerns from councillors. Is there any update on the One-Stop crossing, asked Dan Rowland. I have received no further update on that, said Peter, other than the fact that there was a meeting held six months ago, which the Mayor was at, and at which they basically said ‘this crossing is safe’ and since that point I have heard very little more. There was certainly a push-back from Graham Cox (MKCC Highways chief) saying he could do nothing for it. I have to say it is a very complicated issue as I am sure you are aware, added Peter. Especially in terms of if you moved the crossing what would happen then. Peter added that he would ‘wait and see’ if anything changes and if it does he was sure that OTC would receive an update. It was clearly a case of ‘cross that bridge (or road) when we come to it’.
    PCSO’s report
    PCSO Arlene Ormston was not present at the meeting but she had sent councillors a crime statistics report for January. The list of shame included one anti-social behaviour of driving on a grass play area and doing ‘doughnuts’, one further anti-social behaviour, one assault with injury, one attempted house burglary, eight cases of shoplifting from the Co-op, Morrisons and Sainsbury’s, and three reports of suspicious vehicles or persons.
    Expenditure Report and budget to date
    Has everybody gone through the documents, asked the Mayor. General nodding around the table confirmed that everyone had. Are there any views on the expenditure report, asked the Mayor. General shaking of heads confirmed that there weren’t. And the budget figures, does anyone wish to say anything or comment, asked the Mayor. Further silence around the table confirmed a similar response. 
    Councillors representing at external meetings
    Mary Prosser said she had attended an Anne Hopkins Almshouses meeting where the maintenance programme was discussed and reported to be going well. They are awaiting quotes for some quite big jobs that they are hoping to address, she added. In some rooms the plug sockets have been moved higher up the wall to a more comfortable level so residents don’t have to bend, she said. A coffee morning has been planned for the residents, giving them the opportunity to open up and chat about anything they want to talk about, said Mary. 
    S106 spending
    The Clerk said that work at the Olney Centre had now finished. It has been suggested, she added, that we apply for a defibrillator and a throwline in a lockable accessible cabinet for the riverbank, under ‘emergency services’ S106 funding. Deirdre Bethune added that she had sought advice from Cobbs Garden Surgery who said there could be scope for another throwline at a different part of the river. Public sessions on how to work defibrillators were also suggested, she said.  The Clerk added that talks to open a lido in the town, previously a popular idea, had ‘unfortunately come to a standstill’. 
    Update on river water pollution
    As you know we have monthly meetings on this, said the Mayor. And since the last meeting it was agreed that we should reach out to the city council, who are very supportive. A cabinet member there said they are currently requesting discharge and water quality readings but she didn’t know how long it would take. She said she would have more updates later.
    Biodiversity Policy
    There was an agenda item on updates for the ex-football club building, but there was nothing to add there, so the agenda moved to a plan to consider adopting the Biodiversity Policy recommended by Recs and Services Committee. It was recently recommended at an R&S meeting when it was noted that an additional 18 trees have been planted in the town this season, said the Mayor. MKCC had also agreed that Olney was to mow less and cut back hedges less frequently in a bid to encourage wildlife.  Christina Diamandopoulos said she would like to know how ‘we were going to bring the town with us’ when they start to tell people what’s happening and what has worked, to enthuse people about biodiversity.  This is a policy that has been put out, said Deirdre Bethune and we are just adopting it. So is the council agreement that we should adopt the policy, asked the Mayor. The general consensus was that they should. Deirdre proposed that it be adopted and Christina seconded that thought and the council voted in favour.  And that, as they say, was that. Councillors gathered their still-warm coats to leave as Peter Geary gave a cheery wave goodbye, happy that he had brought something to the (brief) party.
    The Next Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 4th March at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the Mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    March 2024 meeting (published in the April issue)
    Preamble
    Unusually, there was a full complement of councillors present for this month’s meeting. David Tyler declared an interest in the agenda item regarding the tennis club as a family member plays there. Chris Tennant declared an interest in the item concerning the 20mph speed restrictions as a resident of one of the roads impacted. Ian Stokes declared an interest in the item about the ex-football club as the chairman of Olney Town Colts, whose clubhouse is adjacent to the building, and also in the item about the tennis club as the Colt’s training area butts onto the proposed new fence.
    Public Participation
    Kevin Viney spoke regarding plans for additional housing in Olney. He said that when he had previously mentioned plans for a further 300 houses, he had been accused of scaremongering, but it appeared that Milton Keynes City Council (MKCC) is now ‘with shameless face’ pushing for up to 1100 homes. He noted that MKCC had yet to provide details of additional infrastructure such as a bigger surgery, school or even a by-pass to support such growth at the recent presentation to parish councils. Last year, the ‘shadowy’ Integrated Care Board announced that there was now insufficient money to fund the earlier-proposed health hub. Kevin thought Pete Townsend’s song ‘Won’t Get Fooled Again’ seemed appropriate. He believed a ‘united front’ was necessary to truly represent the views of concerned residents who were fed up with stretched school, health and transport problems groaning under the weight of existing building in Olney. He said Olney could count on MKCC, with their ‘cosy developer relationship’ to push Parish Clerks and councillors to sell the proposals to residents. Kevin thought the goal of MKCC was clear: to expand the town by one-third with large houses but reduce the number of affordable homes, and with land prices going for £1 million per acre, it would be a tempting offer for landowners.
    PCSO’s report
    PC Daniel Allen and PCSO Duncan Peerless were present to give the report. PC Allen explained that from May there would be four PCs and four PCSOs looking after Newport Pagnell, Olney, and the rural areas, which he said was the highest for some time. The crime figures for February were: 1 x burglary business, 2 x criminal damage, 2 x harassment, 1 x malicious communication, 2 x public order, 8 x shoplifting, 1 x theft. He said these figures were quite low compared with Newport Pagnell, which shows that Olney is a relatively quiet and safe area, based on reported crime. Mayor Debbie Whitworth said that PCSO Arlene Ormston once again had reiterated the importance of residents reporting crime rather than just being vocal on social media since the actual number of incidents occurring was much higher. Deirdre Bethune questioned figures for shoplifting, saying that shop owners had told her that incidents of shoplifting were ‘incredibly high’. PC Allen said that it was very difficult for the police to investigate shoplifting reports without evidence, particularly CCTV. Very often, businesses would report occurrences but would not provide the CCTV files for several weeks. Colin Rodden asked if the larger supermarkets that were more likely to have enhanced security arrangements were reporting incidents since they should be leading the way for the smaller shops, he thought. PC Allen said that in his experience they were not. Colin also asked about the policing of antisocial behaviour by the river during the summer months, and PC Allen said that it would be the primary focus of one of the new PCs.
    Ward Councillor’s report
    This month it was a double act with Keith McLean giving the first part. He welcomed the news that the police numbers were effectively doubling and said that the Police and Crime Commissioner are very focused on the issue of shoplifting. The public consultation by MKCC on the 20mph speed restriction was due to close on 22nd March, and although he did not know how many residents had responded, he had been asked by a resident why it did not include Weston Road. Later in the meeting, Colin Rodden asked why other areas had not been included, and Town Clerk Jane Brushwood replied that she had asked the same question and been told that it was because Aspreys, Yardley Road and all roads leading off from those had been chosen because two of the schools are on Aspreys and Yardley Road. They had been chosen for the trial, which might then be expanded to other areas of the town. This was just the first stage, said Debbie Whitworth. What about the High Street? asked Colin. There is not a school on the High Street, Jane replied. Colin said he thought it was fair to ask why other roads had been excluded. I’ve just given you the answer, responded Jane, bringing the somewhat circular discussion firmly to a close. Keith said there were some forthcoming changes to the MK Connect transport service. Some MKCC decisions are taken by the full council, some by cabinet (sub-committees), some by delegating decisions to cabinet members, and some by delegating to council officers. This matter was supposed to be decided by a cabinet member, but Keith said he had recently been informed that a decision had been made that from 11th March, a change to operate the service on a zonal basis would be implemented. For example, a resident wishing to travel between Astwood and Olney could do it in one journey as it would be within the northern zone. However, if they wished to travel from Olney to the hospital, they would be taken to the bus stop at Market Hill Newport Pagnell, where they would have to catch a bus. Naomi Brock asked if this would result in a separate charge for each leg of the journey, effectively doubling the cost. It was a further example of the rural population being treated as second-class travellers, thought Keith, particularly as Olney Ward, together with Newport Pagnell North and South combined, makeup 70% of the land area of Milton Keynes. He said he and Peter Geary had met with the Director to express their deep concerns, and it was likely that the implantation date would move to the end of March to early April. Peter Geary then took over to provide an update on the New City Plan for MK. He said that Kevin Viney was 95% correct in what he had said during public participation but emphasised that the plan was not the finished article and there are numerous stages yet to go through. It would be vital to listen to residents’ and professional views on what infrastructure needed to be included, he said. Olney currently has up to 1100 additional houses proposed, but some sites have already been rejected. MK, as a whole, has 300 sites proposed, but only 100 have made it to the next stage. However, the situation is evolving as landowners provide additional information, so some more will drop in, and others will drop out. The northern rural parishes will be working together to share information, he said. Deirdre Bethune said that Cobbs Garden Surgery is looking at obtaining planning permission for the new health hub, even though they still needed to get the funding to build it. Those plans would need revisiting to allow for 1100 new homes, so what should they be doing, she asked? Peter replied that he had been working with the surgery for a number of years to bring forth their plans, but a rough calculation of the potential Sect 106 income from 1100 new houses had indicated that it would not even be sufficient for what was needed already for the current population. The early planning application was important in order to get a principle in place for the site, he said. Colin Rodden asked if Olney would be expected to take additional housing before 2030, which was the expiration date of the current Neighbourhood Plan (NP). Peter said it depends on what happens in June 2025 when MKCC wants to present the plan to the Planning Inspector and at which stage it becomes an ‘emerging policy’. Nothing will happen until the final plan comes back from the Inspector, probably 12 months later. The plan may then require amendments before it is adopted, but from that stage onwards, planning applications could then come forward.
    St Peter and St Paul’s 700 anniversary
    2025 will mark the 700th anniversary of the founding of the church, and David Philipson was present to explain plans for the celebration and request the support of the town council. He said he’d been fortunate enough to obtain some archive material from local historian Liz Knight before she sadly passed away, and one particular item of interest was a program for the sexcentenary in 1925. Although there was no ‘smoking gun’ of definitive evidence that the building started in 1325, there was more evidence supporting it than there is of the pancake race starting in 1445, he said. The current proposal is for a week of celebrations commencing with a service on 29th June 2025, followed by the Cherry Fair, running through to 6th July, with a possible re-enactment of the Battle of Olney Bridge, which took place in 1643.
    Representatives at outside meetings
    Chris Tennant reported on the recent presentation by MKCC policy officers to the parish councils regarding the New City Plan. It pretty much echoed what Peter Geary had said, but Chris said that the additional 1100 houses for Olney was by no means a done deal, as may have been reported elsewhere. There were still a number of stages to go through, he said. Again, Colin Rodden expressed his concern that the existing NP was supposed to be valid until 2030, but the New City Plan could create more houses from 2026. Chris said that whatever was contained in the plan would not be adopted until 2026. The current NP was adopted in 2017, and the additional 300 houses had still not been completed six years later, he said. Naomi Brock asked how could the NP that had been voted on by residents and adopted now be overruled. What was the point of it, she asked? Chris said the original NP had served its purpose and was in the process of being modified to align with the current Plan MK policy. A new version would eventually be required to align with the New City Plan. Deirdre Bethune noted that a NP actually ‘has some bite’ whereas previous plans produced by residents and councils could be and were totally ignored.
    River Pollution Working Group
    Debbie Whitworth explained that a group of councillors had been working closely with two members of the Olney and Clifton Fishing Association as a result of concerns about phosphate run-off and algae in the river. A meeting was held last month, and another is due soon. MKCC are now on board, she said, and Nick Hannon, Assistant Director - Environment, Waste and Commissioning, is keen to bring in an ecology and water health perspective and has agreed to arrange representation from the Environmental Agency (EA). Debbie said this would be essential in order to compare the EA data with that measured by the Fishing association because they just do not match up. When the flooding subsides, the working party intends to investigate the E.coli levels, and she said there is video footage of raw sewage in the river north of Olney from surface water discharge. The council is actively trying to stop people entering the river in the summer due to dangerously high levels of pollution but has also given permission for Riverfest to take place, she said. Debbie Hall thought that the council would stop Riverfest ‘at their peril’, but Debbie said she was just referring to the raft race element.
    Ex Football Club Building
    The Clerk said the council have now taken possession of the building and has engaged surveyors and builders to investigate the drains, roof, and asbestos situation. During a recent visit, rainwater was observed dripping onto the electricity supply, which had now been switched off, she said. The rear wall is dangerously bowed and cracked, so Heras fencing will be erected at the rear of the building to prevent access. Renovation rather than demolition and rebuild might be possible, she thought. She hoped that some plans would be available for the next Recs and Services meeting on 18th March. Naomi Brock asked about security as the building was bound to suffer vandalism, she thought. Deputy Clerk Rob Mungham said the existing CCTV would be a good preventative measure. Ian Stokes said metal bars would be installed across the doors to prevent them being jemmied open.
    Double yellow lines
    As reported previously, responsibility for collating initial requests for additional yellow lines will now rest with parish councils. Requests from residents will come into OTC, who will then consult with impacted residents and businesses. If over 50% are in favour, then OTC will forward the request to MKCC. MKCC will review and then instigate full statutory consultation. Because of the volume of requests that MKCC currently receive, they have asked for them to be submitted en-bloc rather than in dribs and drabs. It was agreed that OTC would submit all requests annually in October, depending on volumes. Dan Rowland asked if the new process would come with enforcement. Debbie Whitworth said she had been assured that MKCC would enforce three times a week.
    Odds and Sods
    A vote was taken as to whether the council should support the proposed 20mph zones and associated traffic calming, which was passed unanimously. Ward Councillor Keith McLean has given OTC £150 from his ward budget to replace the trees on the Dinglederry mound. It appears that the mound is not a natural geological feature, nor was it created for any aesthetic reasons, rather the builders just dumped a huge pile of rubble which eventually grassed over. The Quaker Garden pergola has rotted and will be replaced at a cost of £2,850. The Tennis Club have requested permission to move their fence to enclose the club house. They have also made tentative enquiries about building a Padel court adjacent to the existing tennis courts. Naomi Brock reported that Olney is Kind (OIK) runs a community foodbank which gives out 20-30 food parcels a week. It is currently run from a private house, and they have asked for some storage space at the Olney Centre and permission to run it alongside the community fridge. As previously reported, the town clock, which was purchased by public subscription for the Silver Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II, needs refacing. As repairs have not been forthcoming, the current owner of the building to which it is attached, DCa Architects, has asked for it to be removed within 25 days as per the agreement. The Clerk asked if anyone had any thoughts about where it could be relocated to. Debbie Hall suggested, somewhat mischievously, that perhaps it could be situated next to the Millennium Floral Clock. This was met with much hilarity from Mercury, Councillor Ron Hall and David Pibworth (public attendee), who all recalled that the mechanism of said timepiece had disappeared in mysterious circumstances some 24 years ago before it was ever installed and was never seen again.
    Next Council Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday, April 8th, at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting or at any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk at townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Mercury Report for April 2024
    Wheelie bins rolled into the conversation again at Olney Town Council’s monthly meeting. But this time it wasn’t the new red and blue bins that were the cause of some heated exchanges, but the good old-fashioned black and green ones.
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    There were no requests from members of the pubic to speak so Mayor Debbie Whitworth moved immediately to apologies for absence on the agenda. Councillors Ian Stokes and Naomi Brock were unable to attend and had sent their apologies. Councillor David Tyler was also absent – but Clerk Jane Brushwood had not heard from him by the start of the meeting. There were no declarations of interest from anyone so the Mayor asked for approval of the minutes from the last meeting, held on 4th March. Everyone seemed happy with what they had read and Mary Prosser was pleased to propose the approval while James Cooper seconded.
    Ward Councillor’s Report
    Councillor Keith McLean was in attendance to deliver the news from MK Council as his colleague Peter Geary was tied up with other council business elsewhere. Indeed, Keith’s night wasn’t going to be over after the OTC meeting – he had another gathering to go to following it. Since the last meeting, a few major items have come up, said Keith. The new City Plan discussions have been ‘active’ he added. But no decisions have been made yet, he added, to no surprise to anyone around the table. There’s still a consultation going on, and certain landowners have put their areas forward, he added. It should have been wrapped up in March, said Keith, but unfortunately we won’t see anything until June as (at the time of the meeting) we are in ‘purdah’ when sensitive political items can not be discussed with the local elections looming. A new MK Connect ‘zoning system’ scheme had just started, continued Keith. It’s a plan that means the MK Connect buses run in zones rather than across the whole MK area. He said he had ‘popped over’ to Newport Pagnell that day at about 11am, and someone there told him that there had been no incoming MK Connect buses at all. Keith said he had also heard that there were problems with the service’s booking system.  I’m not surprised it hasn’t gone smoothly, he said with a shrug of the shoulders and the look of a seasoned pro who has seen all manner of delays, debacles and disappointments throughout his illustrious council career. He said he had asked for statistics to ‘see what has happened’, adding that local people had told him they use MK Connect to get to work and that they were very worried. The ward councillor added that he would be waiting to see what the bus company’s reaction was. He said people have to consider not only getting to their destinations but getting back again too and they would have to consider ‘when the last bus runs’. With buses done, it was time for the subject of black bins to come up, particularly about them being collected fortnightly. There has been ‘activity’ on social media about the bins, said Keith, adding that the matter ‘was discussed’ at Milton Keynes Council level.  What was? The Mayor jumped in suddenly. The possibility of the collection of black and green bins going to fortnightly, replied Keith. They were talking about going fortnightly, and those proposals are something that they would consider. So, it’s not pie in the sky, he reiterated, it was discussed at a formal MK council committee. I have also been asked about what’s called street cleansing or roadside cleansing, of the A509, the A422 and the B-roads, said Keith. I keep being told that it’s coming, and some of the verges have been cut from Olney up to Emberton. The challenge that I have is that those roads have 40 and 50 mph speed limits, and they are declared to be safe, whereas you can’t cut verges that are 60 mph routes unless you have traffic management which means you have to close the road. He added that he was disappointed that the work had not started. I’m confident those roads will be treated but I don’t know when, he said. The Mayor picked him up on the bins report. I hear what you’re saying about the bin collections and that report was a council officer’s report at full council in Milton Keynes, she conceded. There was a ‘but’ coming. But it’s not actually policy, there’s obviously speculation and lots of residents are getting concerned about it.  About what? It was Keith’s turn to jump in.  About the bins, said the Mayor, going fortnightly. It is a report by a council officer, but it’s not been taken forward, so I think it’s best to leave it there.  Keith smiled wryly and did what the Mayor suggested: he left it there. And so did everyone else – there followed a long and awkward silence as everyone was again left to consider the thorny subject of bin collection. James Cooper thought MK Connect is an example of how something has been ‘thought about’ but ‘not thought about’. People aren’t sure what to expect, he said. It seems a bit strange to change something that’s working into something that’s not working. The Mayor reiterated that residents who do have any issues with the service should tell ward councillors who have been instructed to report directly back to MK Council who will look into them. We have been told today that they could look to pull the trial, she added ominously. Is this new MK Connect scheme a trial period? asked Chris Tennant. Yes it is, said the Mayor but I myself, I have to get an MK Connect to Newport Pagnell and then get another bus (to Milton Keynes). We have lots of residents who have hospital appointments, for example. And on the bins, said Chris, checking his notes. Everyone looked round at him in horror – oh, not the dreaded bins again? Obviously, there is a lot of consultation over the changes from the old system to the new system. You would hope there would be a lot more consultation on the fortnightly plan rather than just an officer’s report. So, we should take that with a pinch of salt.  What’s the time frame for MK Connect? asked Dan Rowland. It hasn’t been published, but it’s a six-month trial, Keith replied. And the data from that will help to form the tender document for the new service that will start in 2025. That will be very tight for time though, he warned, but I’m sure officers are considering their options. And residents are urged to contact any of the ward councillors or customer services if they are having any issues, reiterated the Mayor.
    Roman coins
    Local historian Rachel Lewis was present to give an account of her work at the ancient Roman find alongside the construction site for the new Aldi store. More details are given on her private study on page 34 of this issue of Phonebox, but Rachel explained to interested councillors that she had been given access to the site and had also received artefacts from MK Museum, which she was able to split between Olney’s schools. There’s a lot of data here that will come out in the future, and because I went to school here, I thought it was right that the schools got something back. In return, she had made 1800 replica Roman dinaris, which were being made available to school children in the town. She thanked the council for their support. Rachel was thanked by the council for her work and research of Roman history in the town and received a warm round of applause for her efforts. Colin Rodden once again stated that he was sorry that developers had buried the Roman mosaic – he has long been a critic of that decision – but he added that he had reassurances from English Heritage that there will be representations about the ancient findings once the supermarket has been built and finished.
    PCSO’s report
    New PCSO Connor Braddish had sent the report, and Clerk Jane Brushwood read out the list. It appeared to be a little ‘assault’ heavy this month – there had been 21 of them, seven with injury and 14 without. The Clerk added that there were also five burglaries (two business and three residential), three cases of criminal damage, four of harassment, two malicious communications, six shopliftings, four thefts and two car or motorbike thefts. Among non-crime-related items were two suspicious persons. Deirdre Bethune asked why the crime report was not given to councillors before the meeting started. The Mayor explained that they like to read out the figures during the meeting so that the public (and therefore Mercury) gets to hear what’s been going on in Olney’s shady underworld of crime.
    Expenditure report
    All of you had those, said the Mayor, looking down at her report. Let’s take expenses first, she said, without a hint of irony. Everyone looked at the expenses sheet without much conversation. It looks as if the council is running up a significant operating loss, said Chris Tennant, because of the works we are doing at the Olney Centre. And we continue to report that we are, he added.  The Clerk allayed everyone’s fears. In the next couple of weeks, we will have about £250,000 coming through the door, she said. But unfortunately, it will be after the year end so it will look disastrous. But, she added, year by year we are very similar. If you took out S106 income and expenditure, let alone what’s due to come in and what has been spent in advance, we are only £2000 different from last year.
    Updates on S106 spending
    James Cooper asked about the Yardley Manor building plans. They are due to start in May and are finishing by the first quarter of 2025, replied the Clerk. Someone had also asked me about the play area there, she added. That has been commissioned and will be finished by May.  And Johnson’s Field? James pressed. I had a meeting with Laura Clancy, MK Council’s project development manager, and she is gathering all the information together for all the different areas, said the Clerk. She has to justify how she spends the money.
    Water pollution working group
    The Mayor said she and the working group were due to have a meeting with MK Council about the state of the local river. The big shock, she said, was that it’s the worst it has ever been for E.coli and the Ouse was now considered among the top five worst rivers in the country for being polluted. It’s considered very serious and unsafe to go in certain parts of the water, she added. Testing has been delayed in our area, said the Mayor, due to the flooding, but it will be restarted soon. Milton Keynes Council officials will be meeting with Environmental Services and the Environment Agency to discuss next steps. A clearly shocked Chris Tennant wanted clarification. You say that the river is among the top five worst in the country? he asked incredulously. Yes, said the Mayor, adopting the tone of a High Court judge passing a death sentence. Well, that’s awful replied Chris, getting the vote for understatement of the night. According to the river report the Ouse is as bad as the Thames now, James Cooper dropped in cheerfully.  Chris was still reeling. Are we mindful of future river-based activities he said, presumably thinking of this year’s annual Raft Race. Yes, came the Mayor’s reply.
    Ex-football club
    It’s all going to plan said the Clerk. We are where we need to be (on plans), but we need to know the funding. It’s a little bit chasing our tails at the moment. The planned toilets at the end of the building are going to cost more than £100,000 she said. I am really keen to pursue that because the current toilet block down at the Rec is not fit for purpose now, especially with Olney’s growing community.  We had a JUG (Joint User Group) meeting and reached out to all the clubs down there and none had any objections to having a new toilet block there, she said. It was agreed that the toilets should be incorporated into the current building plans and the application process for the new sports building, she added. In terms of cost, the council have to look at what they actually need and what they don’t need.  James Cooper started to explain the technical details of the building’s walls and cladding and how it’s all put together, but the Clerk was having none of that. Well, that’s for the experts she interjected, we are meeting with them next week. Councillor Cooper hadn’t finished. Well, I probably know more about building design and what goes into it than most people around this table, he said proudly. But that didn’t impress the Clerk. I’m not professing to know anything about it, she replied. I’m asking the experts. Well, be aware of experts, that’s all I would say, James added, somewhat cryptically. Would it be worth having Jim in the meeting? asked Chris Tennant, thinking he was being helpful. The Clerk shot Chris a withering glare. To be honest, it is an initial meeting, she said. It’s about discussing the different options there, so I don’t think there’s any point at this stage. We’ll look into it in more detail later. The storage space there – is that for various clubs to use the facilities, asked Ron Hall. Yes, said the Mayor. The fishing club said they have 650 members and were saying they were desperate for storage, said Debbie Hall. Well, I’ve already spoken to them about it, said the Clerk. The existing toilet block will become partly a Men’s Sheds Association charity space and partly for use by the fishing club. If they want to have a meeting space, they can use the new building like any other club or party or individual. No one person is going to have exclusive right to it, she added.
    Tennis club and padel court
    More sport followed and it was the turn of the local tennis courts and a potential padel court. The tennis club want to change their fencing, which is going to improve their clubhouse, but they need to be more definitive regarding the fencing, said the Clerk. They also mentioned a padel court, which has gone to Recs and Services and the JUG. Nothing is set in stone, again it’s just a wish list. The Clerk explained what a padel court is. It’s a cross between a tennis and a squash court. The ball goes off the wall and you can carry on playing without having to go and get the ball, so it’s more encouraging for children. If you look at a map of where padel courts are, it’s north of London, and then it’s Derby, and there’s nothing in between. So, this is why it was brought to me, added the Clerk. Are we keen to carry on doing it? Any sports we can get in Olney is probably good for the town. So where do we put it? The plan was to have it near the tennis courts and the MUGA (Multi Use Games Area). It doesn’t interfere with anybody, so how do we feel about it? Deirdre Bethune said that the one important thing was that it was see-through. There were objections to a cricket pavilion scheme there previously because it would change the look down towards the river, she said. Even though it’s glass you won’t be able to see as easily, she added. I think it’s a good idea, said Mary Prosser, with children getting their eye in with all sports, it would bring creation. Yes, it’s a good idea – just where to put it? added James Cooper.  If the club can’t get the money together for it, said the Clerk, is this something that we would be prepared to try to invest in for the tennis club and for the town? Have we got a problem with putting one there? And if the club are not prepared to put one there would we be prepared to? The proposal that the padel court be put in the tennis court vicinity was approved in principle. The revised layout of the tennis court’s fencing was also approved. And with that, it was game, set and match for the meeting.
    Next Council Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 13th May, at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting or at any time the Mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk: townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    May Council Meeting
    The first meeting of the Council Year is known as the Annual Meeting of Olney Town Council (OTC), not to be confused with the Annual Town (Public) Meeting, and is largely given over to administrative functions, such as electing a new Mayor and Deputy Mayor, reviewing the membership of sub-committees and reviewing standing orders and procedural and financial regulations.  A standard council term is four years, although the current council had served three years, owing to the previous council having run for five years due to the Covid pandemic, and an election was therefore due to be held in May of this year. Councillors Ron Hall, Debbie Hall, and Naomi Brock had all stood down. No one else had put themselves forward for election, which meant that all existing members who wished to remain on the council continued to do so, and no election was necessary.  This was in marked contrast to the events of 2021 when there were a large number of candidates and most of the existing councillors had either stood down or lost their seats, although few of the new councillors remained for very long and their resignations were either filled by co-option, by-election or remained vacant.  The council now consists of Chris Tennant, Christina Diamandopoulos, Colin Rodden, Dan Rowland, David Tyler, Debbie Whitworth, Deirdre Bethune, Ian Stokes, Jim Cooper, and Mary Prosser (and later Chris Shaw).
    Public Participation
    There was no one wishing to speak at this month’s meeting. Perhaps everyone was storing up issues to take to the Annual Town (Public) Meeting the following Friday, mused Mercury somewhat optimistically.
    Election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor
    Deirdre Bethune proposed Debbie Whitworth for Mayor, and Mary Prosser seconded. Is there anyone else wishing to stand asked Debbie? Silence. Is there anyone there asked Deirdre? Still silence, so in the absence of any other candidate, Debbie was elected without a vote, and she accepted.  For the role of Deputy Mayor, Debbie proposed Mary Prosser, and Deirdre seconded. Jim Cooper suggested the absent Chris Tennant. Has he shown an interest? asked Town Clerk Jane Brushwood. No, admitted Jim. In that case we can’t accept the nomination responded Jane, although she said she recognised that Chris is a very valued councillor.  Mary was therefore also elected unopposed.
    Apologies for absence and declarations of interest
    Colin Rodden and Chris Tennant had sent apologies. Dan Rowland was not present and had not sent his apologies, although he arrived later, having been unavoidably delayed. Nobody declared an interest.
    Co-option of new member
    Chris Shaw had previously been a co-opted member of OTC from July 2014 to the election in May 2016, when he had stood down. Chris said he moved to Olney in 1992 and had lived in the town or surrounding villages since then. He has had 40 years of professional experience in the property market and social housing, and since Olney is expanding, whether it wants to or not, he said the council needed expertise in that area. He has also had experience in the charity sector as a trustee of the MK Parks Trust and chair of a care home charity with local and national care homes and is currently a trustee of the MK Community Foundation. Chris was unanimously elected and took his seat at the table.  Note: This still leaves four vacancies on the council during a time of rapid expansion for Milton Keynes so if any resident would like to offer themselves for co-option please contact the Town Clerk at townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk or visit the council office in The Olney Centre.
    Annual business
    This consisted of a review of the following items:  a. To review the Scheme of Delegation and Terms of Reference  b. Appointment of Members to Committees  c. To review and adopt the Standing Orders  d. To review and adopt the Financial Regulations  e. Review the inventory of land and other assets including buildings and office equipment.  f. Confirmation of arrangements for insurance cover in respect to all insurable risks.  g. Review of the Council’s and/or staff subscriptions to other bodies.  h. Review of the Council’s complaints procedures.  i. Review of the Council’s policies, procedures and practices in respect to its obligations under freedom of information and data protection legislation. j. Review the Council’s policy for dealing with the press/media  k. Review the Council’s employment policies and procedures.  l. Determining the time and place of ordinary meetings of the Council up to and including the next annual meeting of the Council. The makeup of the various committees will remain the same, minus the members who have stood down, meaning that some will struggle to be quorate. Deirdre Bethune noted that there was no mention of the Annual Town Meeting in the Standing Orders, although it is a statuary obligation to hold one between 1st March and 1st June. Deirdre proposed that the Standing Orders be amended to state that it will normally be held each May, except in an election year when it will be held in April, i.e. before the election, so that the council can present reports for the previous year. She noted that this hadn’t happened this year, and as a result the council no longer had a Chair of Finance to report at the forthcoming Town Meeting. The proposal was agreed.
    To Approve the draft AGAR for submission
    AGAR stands for Annual Governance and Accountability Return. The AGAR is a set of documents and financial statements that local councils are required to prepare and submit each year. It is an essential part of the external audit process. The Clerk explained that this is then subject to an internal order before being reviewed by the Finance Committee and then full council before submission to the external auditor. All this must be done before 1st July, but the internal auditor has been unable to complete the task due to a family bereavement, but it was now underway.  The meeting closed 19 minutes after it started, which is incredibly brief in Mercury’s experience.
    Post-meeting odds and sods
    Although the meeting was now closed the Clerk reminded councillors that the beacon on Barnfield would be lit at 9.15pm on the evening of 6th June to celebrate the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings. Ian Stokes noted that the problems of antisocial behaviour on the Rec had started with the recent hot weather. There had been comments on social media asking what OTC was going to do about it, he said, but last year when the council had asked for volunteers to act as marshals residents had not supported them. This will be an agenda item at next month’s meeting.
    Next Council Meeting
    The next meeting will be held on Monday 3rd June at 7pm in the Olney Centre. If you would like to contribute to the Public Participation section at the start of the meeting, or any time the mayor deems appropriate, please contact the Town Clerk, townclerk@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk.
    Annual Town Meeting
    The Annual Town Meeting will be held on Friday 17th May. Read all about it below.
    Annual Town Meeting Summary
    Attendance
    When there are any contentious matters to be aired by the town then we can expect a packed hall so with all things relatively calm in Olney in recent times there was a small but friendly crowd of mainly stalwarts of the town to hear the great and good of Olney have their twopenny worth.
    The Ann Hopkins Trust (The Alms Houses, Weston Road, Olney)
    First to speak was David Chennells representing the Ann Hopkins Trust (or more commonly known as) who run the Alms Houses Weston Road Olney. I certainly didn’t know that it was nonprofit making in that no actual rent is charged to tenants except funds to cover costs of maintaining the buildings. Unsurprisingly there is a waiting list of 17. David gave particular thanks to Betsy Williams, a trustee who is always on hand to keep an eye on the tenants and their needs.
    Cobbs Garden Surgery
    Dr Chris Herman from Cobbs Garden Surgery spoke about where the surgery was at now in terms of staffing with at present 4 doctors and various ancillary staff. Chris acknowledged the help from the Patient Participation Group and Olney is Kind. Both of which are making a tremendous difference to Olney. The story of when and where they will ever get planning permission for a new surgery off East Street rumbles on with various roadblocks in the way. Chris lamented the fact that with new housing and the new care home the need for a new surgery was critical. It seems the mantra infrastructure before (homes) has been cast aside.
    The Mayor, Debbie Whitworth
    Debbie Whitworth, Mayor of Olney at various points in the evening referred to the achievements of the town. Debbie mentioned the Community Fridge which has saved 7 tons of food going to landfill. The allotments where bulk containers and rainwater harvesters have been provided. The community orchard has seen the mass planting of trees and crocuses. The recreation ground is always a concern due to concerns re the quality of the river water and the OTC is working with the Fishing Association to tackle and reduce sewage in the water.   The ex-football club is is to be a community building and is undergoing extensive works, particularly the planning of new toilets. The Olney centre has had many improvements in the past year and more space has been made available to Olney Pre School. Finance - Although there appears to be an overspend it is because of the delay in waiting for 106 monies. In general income is up and expenditure is down. Future works: the play areas in Olney which are in bad shape- there is work starting soon and hopefully will mostly be completed by the school summer holidays. The Olney centre in conjunction with MIND are hopefully starting a youth club for after school. Volunteers needed who are DBS checked. Aldi is due to open in August. There are CPR and DeFib training sessions coming up soon.
    The Olney Centre
    Deirdre Bethune talked about the Olney centre improvements, Dickens of a Christmas (footfall down a little due to the weather but steady trade). HR- there was a good team of staff headed up by the Town Clerk Jane Brushwood.
    The Development Group
    Report from the Development Group referred to the neighbourhood plan and how it affects Olney with the various suggested sites for building new houses or facilities.
    Olney is Kind
    Naomi Brock from Olney is Kind talked about their work with the Patient Participation Group and the new initiatives to help fund services at Cobbs Garden Surgery that would not be funded by the NHS. These include funding for a nurse for the elderly as well as ante natal classes in Olney. Naomi made a plea for foster carers as there are 400 children in the MK area who need care and only 70 foster carers. Could you help?
    Cowper & Newton Museum
    Tom Jones from the Cowper & Newton Museum outlined the work of the museum which has international recognition with visitor numbers growing all the time. This has led to the need for new toilet facilities which are now in the planning stage.
    Newport Pagnell & Olney Lions
    Trevor Aldred from Newport & Olney Lions gave a summary of the events and fundraising the Lions have been involved in. These include marshalling events such as the Fireworks to organising events such as Motorama (this year is 9.5.24) David Phillipson talked about the 700-year anniversary of the church SS Peter & Paul, Olney which will be next year (28th June 2025 to 6th July 2025, See separate info in other articles in the Phonebox as and when. Keith McLean Ward Councillor outlined the fact that MK Council is consulting on the NEW City Plan with a report due out soon.
    700th Anniversary of St Peter & Paul church
    David Phillipson talked about the 700-year anniversary of the church SS Peter & Paul, Olney which will be next year (28th June 2025 to 6th July 2025, See separate info in other articles in the Phonebox as and when.
    Ward Councillors report
    Keith McLean Ward Councillor outlined the fact that MK Council is consulting on the NEW City Plan with a report due out soon.
     

     

    EXTRA FILES FROM COUNCIL REPORTS 2011-2013
    Probably duplicates
    Mercury's reports for 2013 and before
    Mercury report for the Council Meeting of Monday 7th January 2013
    Public Participation
    Rena Partridge First to speak was Rena Partridge, noting that the street lighting at the north end of West Street is very poor and a danger for pedestrians, and asking if there’d been any progress on improving access arrangements to the Co-op car park. She felt the current access from Weston Road was dangerous, particularly for pedestrians exiting the car park. Steve Clark explained it was a pity that neither Ward Councillor was present, as they’d have the most up to date information for Rena. He commented only on her second point, saying that changes were under consideration but he didn’t know when they’d be made. Bryan Rice Second to speak was Bryan Rice, clearly not happy about the subject of parking in Oakdown Crescent and Weston Road. Noting that the latest round of complaints had been ongoing for around a year, he felt that nothing had been done and that the remit given to the Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Transport representative was ‘inept’. He noted a couple of ways he felt the situation could be resolved, that Councillors should ‘pull their socks up’ and that, if the situation didn’t get resolved, he’d be back the next month, and the next... until it did.  Steve Clark explained that neither Highways nor Parking issues were in the power of Olney Town Council (OTC) to solve – they were MKC issues. Ron Bull concluded this item, noting pointedly that there was a vacancy for a new Councillor, should one wish to put themselves forward.
    Recreation Ground dog fouling
    Rosemary Osborne had met Rob Ward, Neighbourhood Manager at MKC, to discuss various issues related to dog fouling. Namely, to consider whether the Recreation Ground should have a designated area for dog walkers, whether the improved signage has helped, and to discuss the proposed fencing around the football pitch adjacent to East Street. The decisions made in this meeting were to install dog bag dispensers at the main entrances to the Ground, to monitor the impact of the improved signage, to request that the Sports Clubs talk with dog walkers using their pitches and, if appropriate, hand out dog bags to them, and that an article would be produced for the Phonebox to educate people about the effects of dog fouling. Liam Costello noted that the proposed fencing around the main football pitch would make it easier for a dog control order to be applied to that area, but that for private land, such as that on which various rugby pitches are based, a joint scheme would be required. Ben Brock, one of the Rugby Club coaches, noted that the Club may well be in favour of such an approach. Peter Gage, who’d spoken on this topic in the Public Participation section of last month’s meeting and had come to listen to this one, felt that providing information and education to the Ground’s users was an excellent approach.
    East Street Car Park
    As noted in an earlier Mercury, OTC has sought advice from MKC related to the East Street Car Park extension, prior to it submitting a formal Planning Application. That advice highlighted two areas of concern. First, there are three large trees located to the edge of the proposed additional car parking area. These trees must be retained, implying that protection must be afforded to their roots, meaning that the space immediately around them can’t be used. Second, there must be a six metre over-run area between the football pitch and the additional parking area. This latter area of concern surprised Councillors, in that the Football Club’s Planning Application specifies that the fencing will be only two metres from the Pitch. After some discussions, Councillors decided to wait on the outcome of this Application, due to be considered mid January, then to consider having proper Architect’s plans drawn up for the site, including allowances for the tree roots.
    Berrells Court
    As reported previously, the Council is trying to facilitate surface improvements to Berrells Court. It’s contacted the landlords of properties on the Court and now has a list of those who’d be interested in collaborating to pay for the improvements. Councillors planned to discuss pricing for these improvements in the confidential items agenda item handled after the public, including Mercury, have left the meeting.
    Summer planting
    Tony Evans explained that the Council has received the quotation and plans for the summer bedding plants around Olney. Martin, the new Groundsman, is keen to add more of a ‘wow factor’ to the displays by using a wider range of informal plants and, as such, The Knoll and the bed outside the Cemetery Rest Room will trial these ideas. These have resulted in the quotation of £3077 being £480 more than last year. Councillors felt the would bring, and voted unanimously to accept it.
    Armed Forces Day
    Alan Richardson introduced this item noting that, each June, the Council hosts a buffet meal for war veterans in the Olney Centre. This is much appreciated, but the attendees would like to eat sitting together in one room, and the Olney Centre can’t accommodate this. Alan had talked informally with the Carlton House Club, and it appeared they could host the event in their function room, also providing the food. Councillors liked this, giving their unanimous approval for Alan to pursue this course of action.
    Pinders Circus
    After a successful visit to the Pyghtle last year, Pinders Circus has asked to visit again, the dates being Thursday 9th to Sunday 12th May. Councillors agreed unanimously to this request, with all bar one voting to keep the daily rate charged to the Circus unchanged this year. Surf to www.pinderscircus.co.uk for more information.
    Model T Ford Rally
    Councillors voted to allow the Market Square Car Park to be used as part of a Model T Ford Rally on Friday 7th June. All voted in favour bar three against. The benefits cited were that it’d be interesting for people to see, and should bring more people to the town. The drawbacks were the consequent lack of parking in the centre.
    Market Place Toilet refurbishment
    The toilet refurbishment having been completed, Councillors reviewed the cost breakdown. The main issue was a significant overspend of around £6,000, around a third of the expected total. This was discussed at some length and just the main points are covered here. Tony Evans asked if all the additional amounts had been sanctioned by Mike Hughes, the Clerk of Works appointed by the Council. Liam Costello replied that they had. Jeremy Rawlings felt that some of the overspend, such as that on unforeseen underground sewage work, was reasonable. Overall, there was concern about the issue and, when Rosemary Osborne suggested inviting Mike to a meeting so that Councillors could put their questions to him and he could answer them, it was agreed quickly.
    Specialist Nurse for the Elderly
    Steve Clark noted that, with OTC having funded a specialist nurse for the elderly for the previous year, Olney finance firm The MPA Group – surf to www.thempagroup. co.uk – have set a great example to other local businesses by taking on the funding of that post.
    TOG, PCSOs and torches
    Steve reported that during last year’s Fireworks Display, The Olney Group (TOG) was glad to have help from the local Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs). TOG realised that the PCSOs’ torches were considerably less powerful than those used by the event marshals, and asked whether it could purchase brighter ones to replace them. The response was positive, six bright new LED torches were bought, and they’re now in the hands of the PCSOs.
    Kitchener Centre
    The Kitchener Centre offers day care to older people from Olney and the surrounding villages. Steve Clark outlined a proposal which local GP and ex-Councillor Brian Partridge had discussed with him. Brian was instrumental in the original Kitchener Centre project and, with over a quarter of local people now being over 60, the need for this day care is on the increase. As such, the Kitchener Centre is bursting at the seams and would benefit from additional capacity. Brian had asked Steve if OTC would be involved in a project to raise funds for an extension to the building. This topic will be included on the next meeting’s agenda. Next Meeting - 4th February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
    Mercury report for the Council Meeting of Monday 4th February 2013
    Public Participation
    Isobel Ager-Righinioti The only person wishing to speak at this monthʼs meeting was Isobel Ager-Righinioti. Isobel said that she uses her bike for short journeys around the town in preference to driving a car. One afternoon last July she was riding down West Street and as she drew level with ʻThe Archʼ a car caused her to fall off her bike. She felt that a contributing factor had been the presence of the cobblestones in the road, which she said should not be there on such a narrow street and said she had legal advice confirming this fact. Would it not be better if East Street and West Street were both one-way, she suggested? Deidre Bethune responded, saying that one of the conditions of the planning permission which was granted for the houses served by The Arch was that some form of traffic calming must be provided and the cobbles were not actually part of the highway.
    Co-option of new councillor
    Following the resignation of Andrew Dooley, a vacancy had arisen on the council and, there being no call from the electorate for an election to fill the post, it fell to the council to fill the post by co-option. Only one candidate had put his name forward for nomination, that being Joe Stacey. Joe was invited by Mayor Steve Clark to give a brief resume of his reasons for wishing to join the council. Joe said he moved to Olney from Suffolk, where he had previously served as a councillor, in July last year and had found it to be a “smashing place”. He had worked for 40 years in the construction industry, he said, and hoped to bring some of this experience in serving on the council. There then followed a short discussion on what was the minimum period of residence before one could become a town councillor, with periods of between one and three years being suggested. Peter Geary said there was no statutory minimum and the council could elect “whoever they wished”. There being no other candidates, Joe was co-opted unopposed and took his seat at the table.
    Kitchener Centre
    Following the discussion at last monthʼs meeting about a possible extension to the Kitchener Centre, Dr Brian Partridge and centre manager Helena Newbold were present to discuss the proposal. Brian explained that the Kitchener Centre offers day care to older people from Olney and the surrounding villages and, with over a quarter of local people now being over 60, the need for this day care is on the increase. OTC had always been receptive to the needs of the elderly and took up the challenge of getting the centre built when the nearest similar facility was in Newport Pagnell, he said. One of the key roles of the centre was to enable the elderly to continue to live in their own homes rather than go in to residential care but the ability to remain independent becomes less as we grow older. The centre currently provides for 14 people per day between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm, enabling them to have a hot meal, meet other people and be gently supervised. Helena explained that there are two waiting lists in operation: The first is for people wishing to join the service and there are currently nine on the list with another six in progress. The second list is for people who already use the centre but want additional sessions and this currently stands at 12. Sadly, the only way that people move up the list is when others go in to residential care or pass away. The clientele covers a wide range of ages (more than 30 years) and abilities, with some people in their sixties with dementia attending sessions with those in their nineties. Over such a range it was inevitable that people would have different interests and ideally separate sessions should be available for different age groups, she said. Brian concluded by that he was garnering views as to whether there was a perceived need for further provision for the elderly in Olney and the surrounding area but so far the indication were positive. However, he wanted to be sure that if the centre expanded it would continue to be financially viable, particularly when public finances are being cut back. He did not have time to personally spearhead a fundraising campaign, he said, but thought that perhaps an individual with the right skills and sufficient time might be persuaded to volunteer. Ward Councillor Peter Geary suggested that a Business Case should be prepared and funding sought from MKC. Tony Evans said that since the centre opened in 2000, OTC had supported it and thought there was no question that they would want to be involved but wondered what sort of costs were likely to be involved and would it be just for the building and running costs or staffing as well. OTC could help get the ball rolling but agreed it would need someone to manage the fundraising on a full time basis.
    East Street Car Park
    As previously reported, OTC has sought advice from MKC related to the East Street Car Park extension, prior to it submitting a formal Planning Application. One of the points that MKC identified was that the Football Club had applied for Planning permission to erect a protective fence around their pitch to comply with league regulations and a condition of that permission being granted would be that there must be a six metre over-run area between the football pitch and the fence, The Football Club was subsequently able to argue that the 6m run off area suggested by planning officers was not actually an element of the league regulations, so the officers eventually agreed not to require this as a condition. Steve Clark said there were still a number of issues around the planned car park and the council recognised that an application for car parking may not be popular, so they intend to conduct a survey to gauge the amount of local support. If the outcome is reasonably positive, they would then apply for planning permission. Tony Evans said that in his opinion the town desperately needs more car parking spaces and was passionate that it should go ahead. Peter Geary was sure that there would be flak from residents and said that he did not want the council to start work on the scheme and then back out. He said he, personally, would not be voting for the scheme because it was too expensive for too few additional spaces. Jeremy Rawlings thought that additional parking was required but only at specific times and would only support the scheme if the additional parking was only available as an overflow on match days. John Sharp disagreed, saying that it was needed seven days a week and would be used. The existing East Street (Rugby Club) car park is too far away and too dark, he said. Eventually a vote was taken on whether to progress with the survey which was narrowly passed by four votes to three, the rest of the members present inexplicably choosing to abstain.
    Budget and Precept 2013/2014
    The finance committee have recommended an increase of 5.84% to the precept. This is the portion of the council tax which is collected by MKC on behalf of OTC. The Income & Expenditure Budget vs. Actual appeared to show a deficit of £15k, although there seemed some doubt as to whether it was a ʻrealʼ deficit. Peter Geary felt that the budget should balance and said that the council needed a plan to reduce the deficit and balance the budget. MKC is capped in terms of the amount it can increase the council tax and OTC could be the same. Tony Evans felt that they were a good set of figures and easily understandable. The budget was passed by a vote of five to three. Electoral Review of Milton Keynes As previously reported, The Local Government Boundary Commission for England has undertaken discussions with MKC and consulted publicly on council size and has decided that the number of councillor should be increased to 57, from the current 51. Each a councillor will cover 3300 residents as opposed to 3000 at present. The draft proposal as now been published and recommends that Milton Keynes be divided into 19 wards, each represented by three councillors. In most of urban MK this is fine but in the rural areas this leaves very large geographical areas with many individual communities requiring individual attention from their councillors in attending parish council meetings etc. For example a merged Sherington and Olney ward would comprise 17 parishes, which Jeremy Rawlings described as ridiculous. Steve Clark proposed that OTCʼs response to the document should be a request to maintain the status quo such that the current Olney ward continues to be represented by two councillors. The motion was passed by five votes to two, again with a number of abstentions.
    Neighbourhood Planning
    The council had received a copy of the document ʻQuick Guide to Neighbourhood Plansʼ. Since April 2012 local communities have been able to produce Neighbourhood Plans for their local area, putting in place planning policies for the future development and growth of their neighbourhood. The plan is subject to examination and referendum and then forms part of the Local Development Plan. This statutory status gives Neighbourhood Plans far more weight than parish/community plans, such as the  'Olney for You' document that was produced by members of the community over five years ago. Tony Evans thought that a plan for Olney is a 'must do' as it is an opportunity to influence the planners and wondered if it might be possible to reuse some of the Olney for You output. Peter Geary pointed out that if Olney produced a plan ii must fit in with the existing development framework and could not be used to override MKC plans. If, for example, MKC strategy was to build 400 new homes in the town then a Neighbourhood Plan could not be produced proposing no new housing. Unlike Olney for You it would need to be council led and the effort involved would be massive in comparison. Several such plans were being produced elsewhere in Millon Keynes, he said, and were clos€ to going to referendum. The council agreed to set up a working group of members to investigate the feasibility of producing a plan for Olney. 
    Superfast Broadband for Olney 
    Town Clerk Uarn Costello reported that he'd had meetings with MKC about the position of street cabinets that will be required for superfast broadband to be rolled out in Olney. Pete Geary explained that this is being enabled by an alliance between MKC, Bedford Borough and Central Bedfordshire Councils to provide superfast broadband to areas that are not part of BT's commercial deployment plans, as described in the Councillor Comer article in January's Phonebox. MKC has set aside £2.4m and has won a government grant of £ 140k to appoint a contractor to do the work, the contract being due to be let in August or September this year. However, since the meeting this has been overtaken by the recent announcement from BT that Olney is now part of its own commercial deployment some time in 2014.  Next Meeting - 4th March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th March In the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides Is appropriate.
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting of March 2013
    Public Participation
    Claire Wood Claire Wood addressed Councillors about the Church Hall on High Street South. The Church has been considering how the Hall could be better used, and aims to make it meet some of the needs within Olney and be more part of the townʼs community. Itʼs identified some projects to help it meet this aim: a Memory Club for those in the early stages of memory degeneration, a Youth Milkshake Café with two separate strands –to provide a place for secondary school young people to meet after school (initially weekly) and to provide training for them –and New Skill for those who need basic skills training, for example those recently bereaved whose partners had provided for them before. To achieve these projects, some changes to the Church Hall will be starting shortly, including improved access, improved toilet and shower facilities, a new meeting room, a mezzanine floor and a meeting area.
    Kitchener Centre
    Ann Lark and Nick Stacey from Age UK attended the meeting to discuss the Kitchener Centre, a day care centre for vulnerable older people from in and around Olney. Age UK has been managing the Centre under contract to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) since 2000. The contract to manage the Kitchener Centre and another day care centre in Bletchley, currently run by the British Red Cross (BRC), has been out for competitive tender, the bid process having just been completed. Itʼs not yet known who has won the contract, but Ann and Nick provided background information on what might happen next. First, the BRC did not submit a bid for the Bletchley centre, as running day care centres no longer fits with its national agenda. Second, and most important for Olney, the contract value specified by MKC is significantly below that which Age UK believes is required to continue to offer the current level of service at the Kitchener Centre. Age UK has been given notice to leave the Kitchener Centre later this year unless this issue is resolved. Responding to the clear, though not fully articulated, implications for the standard of care being offered, David Rumens, of Senior Voice MK and previously Olney Town Council (OTC), said his organisation would apply as much pressure to MKC as it could, and will also keep in contact with OTC on the subject. Olney Councillors were also clearly concerned about this issue. In the background, OTCʼs letter to MKC regarding the possibility of an extension has now received a reply, any consideration being put on hold until the end of June when the contract commissioning process should be near completion.
    Highways
    Andrew Jackman is the new Team Leader for Traffic Management at MKC, having replaced Richard Duffill in the post. Tonight he was attending the Council meeting to discuss various Highways issues in the town. Parking in Oakdown Crescent is a longstanding and contentious issue. Andrew agreed that there was severe pressure on parking there, as had been made clear to him by Ward Councillors Peter Geary and Debbie Brock and stated that, if there was a simple solution, itʼd be in place by now. Peter Geary outlined three current ideas, each with highly approximate ballpark figures: • A new road running from Dagnall Road through The Pyghtle to serve the properties which face it, £250,000. • A car park in the (retained) garden of 102 Weston Road, £85,000. • A residentsʼ parking scheme in Oakdown Crescent, £5,000. As is usual for this issue, a good deal of discussion followed. The main points were that Peter Geary felt OTC should propose a solution, Andrew wanted to understand the problem and have MKC work out the best solution and, when pushed by Ron Bull, Andrew said the issue would be addressed by the end of March 2014. Finally, Debbie Brock noted that the investigative work done so far hadnʼt gone to waste – it would still be useful when choosing the best way forward. The Olney Traffic Management Review in 2008 included the idea of having one-way systems in East Street and West Street. Andrew felt that using a one-way system to calm traffic was an odd idea, since evidence shows that such systems in fact make people drive 5-10 MPH faster. Based on the brief discussion which followed, which saw various Councillors expressing safety concerns regarding East Street, itʼs hard to see the one-way idea progressing further. Regarding potholes, Andrew explained that the Highways Authority has a duty to maintain roads in a safe condition. All roads are inspected regularly at least once a year. Defects, whether spotted during inspections or reported by members of the public, are dealt with in 24 hours if classified as dangerous or 28 days otherwise. The general condition of the roads has been contributed to by bad winters causing water which has penetrated the road to freeze and lift the surface. Insufficient maintenance on a national basis hasnʼt helped either. MKC is developing plans for a pothole month, likely April, during which the Council would deploy many road gangs to blitz the problem.
    Fairʼs fair
    OTC agreed to requests to hold the annual fair on the Recreation Ground between Wednesday 19th and Saturday 22nd June, and the Cherry Fair on the Glebe on Saturday 29th June.
    Olney Centre facilities
    Great news for those who attend Council meetings but, by the end, feel like theyʼve missed out on the interesting bits. OTC has received quotes to improve the Olney Centreʼs facilities for the hard of hearing. One quote was for a fixed system, building on the hearing aid induction loop already fitted in the Council Chamber and supplying boundary microphones and an amplifier. The other also provided microphones but, instead of using the existing induction loop, provided earphones and two mini loops which the hard of hearing could wear around their necks. No decision was made on the night, but one or both systems will be trialled during a real Council meeting.
    Fields
    Liam noted that the hedge laying on Crouchʼs Field has been completed. Also, the gate into Crouchʼs Field has been moved to comply with the right of way through to Nichols Field - the field to the East of Crouch's Field beside the river.
    East Street Car Park
    There was a brief discussion about the proposed extension to the East Street Car Park, particularly including how it would adjoin the proposed fencing around the Recreation Ground football pitch. Joe Stacey noted that, while a concrete path is planned to go all the way round the pitch, thatʼs not an FA requirement – the FA requires hard standing on only two sides. He suggested instead that the path at the East Street end could be removed from the proposals, thus creating more space for parking which currently looks pretty tight. Although the Football Club does have planning permission, and OTC as landlord has given its permission, OTC could change its permission if the Council felt that section of the path should not be included. The Council will discuss the issue with the Football Club.
    Community Asset Transfer and the Olney Centre
    Back in February 2012, Alan Richardson stated and Peter Geary confirmed that the Olney Centre was not an asset which would be affected by the Community Asset Transfer (CAT) scheme, as it was not MKCʼs asset to transfer. Now, however, legal opinions about this differ. The Olney Centre is held in a trust and, until recently, was believed to be owned by that trust and not by MKC, even though the trustees are wholly that Council. Day to day, MKC is responsible for certain aspects of the repair of the building while OTC is responsible for other aspects. The ownership of the Centre has been challenged, with the Queenʼs Counsel (QC) and the Charity Commission having been asked for advice. The QCʼs advice was that the Olney Centre was the property of the trust and hence could not be transferred. However, the Charity Commission believes that, since around £400 was paid on the transfer of the building in 1870, it seems to have been purchased by the predecessor to Buckinghamshire County Council, then reverted to that Council when it formed, and then to MKC in 1996. It is therefore currently thought that the property could be transferred under the CAT programme to a community organisation or group such as OTC. MKC is to arrange a Public Meeting at the Olney Centre at 6.00pm on Wednesday 22nd May to explain CAT and how it affects the Olney Centre. This may well be a very interesting meeting. Mercury thanks Peter Geary and Liam Costello for background information on this topic. Next Meeting - 8th April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 8th April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting of April 2013
    Public Participation
    David Rumens There was only one member of the public wishing to speak at this month’s meeting and that was ex-Olney Town Councillor David Rumens speaking on behalf of Senior Voice MK. David explained that the contract to run the Kitchener Centre was recently put out to tender by Milton Keynes Council and they had set a tender value of £312,000. Age UK is the only organisation to have tendered for the contract but its tender was rejected as it was substantially above MKC’s valuation. This raised the question of whether the original tender was correctly valued, he said. The fact that there was only one bid from an existing provider and that it exceeded the tender value by a considerable sum suggested that something may have gone wrong during the tender valuation process. There is considerable concern being expressed about the ability of Milton Keynes Council to deliver a Day Care Service at an equivalent standard on the allocated budget both now and in the future, he said. As things stand the service will be brought in house and decision will be made by Councillor Debbie Brock, as Cabinet Member of MKC with Portfolio responsibility for Adult, Older Years and Health, as to whether the council or Milton Keynes Service Partnership will manage the Day Care Service. This matter was discussed as a formal agenda item later in the meeting and David was invited to stay for that discussion.
    Superfast Broadband
    Present at this month’s meeting was Nick Brown from MKC planning department. Nick explained that his role was to negotiate with Openreach to identify the best locations for the additional street cabinets that are necessary to contain the equipment that provides the service. They need to be located as near as possible to the existing cabinets which they connect to. There is one such cabinet in the High Street opposite the Flower Shop and the proposed site of the equipment cabinet is in the Market Place, opposite Darwins Gifts and Cards. Nick explained that it could not be positioned next to the existing cabinet due to the requirement for Openreach to access the cabinet every time a customer was set up for the service, which would restrict access on the footpath. The proposed position would enable parking while the engineer carried out the work, he said. The usual locations selected were footpaths, which MKC own as part of the highway, so there are no issues with access. The member present felt that the box would be rather obtrusive in the proposed location so agreed to Nick’s request for it to be moved back a few feet on to the Market Place and rotated by 90 degrees so that it was parallel with the wall for the planter. Nick said he expected work to commence in 6-8 weeks.
    Future of the Kitchener Centre
    As reported last month, Age UK has been managing the Centre under contract to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) since 2000. The contract to manage the Kitchener Centre had been out for competitive tender and the bid process has just been completed. There had been 10 Expressions of Interest but only Age UK had tendered and its application had been rejected because it is £100,000 more than MKC’s tender value of £312,000. Jeremy Rawlings said the decision could be ‘called in’ if 20 members of the electorate requested it and suggested that David Rumens went down that route’. Why had the other nine parties declined to bid, he wondered. Could it be that the indicative price had put them off? He also observed that OTC only had Age UK’s estimate that it would cost more to run the service, since no other bids had been submitted. David Rumens said that as part of the bid process any interested party could submit questions and the answer would be made available to all of the other parties so they would have been fully aware that that Age UK had received no replies. Debbie Brock said that due diligence had been applied and MKC were confident that £312,000 to run the service is a realistic figure and as portfolio holder she felt that ‘internalisation’ is the best option. Jeremy said that, with respect to Debbie, MKC did not have a good track record on due diligence. Debbie said that good grounds would have to exist in order for the decision to be called in, but Jeremy replied that Age UK’s expert opinion that the service could not be run within that financial constraint should be sufficient. Jeremy formally proposed that OTC recommend that the decision should be called in. The motion was seconded by Deidre Bethune and passed by a large majority.
    Parking in Oakdown Crescent
    Following on from last month’s discussion about the Parking in Oakdown Crescent there was an item on this month’s agenda to discuss one of the options: A new road running from Dagnall Road through The Pyghtle to serve the properties which face it, i.e. numbers 70 – 92 Weston Road. This scheme would involve the council relinquishing part of The Pyghtle, which caused some consternation to members. Steve Clark observed that when permission was granted for the houses on The Pyghtle there was a condition that at least half of the land must be retained for recreational use. Even if OTC agreed to relinquish the land it was unlikely that MKC would fund the scheme he said, since it was estimated that it would cost £250K. John Sharp noted that part of the problem with parking in Oakdown Crescent was due to the fact that a fence that previously existed had fallen down. If that was reinstated then there would be no shortcut making parking there less attractive, he thought. Peter Geary stated that because the fence had been down for a number of years it was now effectively a right of way. Joe Stacey wondered if providing parking spaces in the garden of the houses in Oakdown Crescent might alleviate the situation but Peter Geary pointed out that most of the cars parked there did not belong to residents. (Mercury wondered if this might be a passing reference to the revolutionary ‘Driveway Parking Scheme’ announced in the April edition of The Phonebox, as did a number of other councillors, apparently!) Deidre Bethune proposed that the scheme be rejected in favour of one of the cheaper alternatives: parking spaces on the retained garden of 102 Weston Road. This was seconded and passed unanimously, meaning that every member present voted. This is a most unusual occurrence for OTC.
    Community Defibrillator at Recreation Ground
    The Joint User Group (JUG) has recommended that a defibrillator be located at the recreation ground for the use of the various sports clubs that use it. Steve Clark wondered if the clubs would be prepared to assist with funding and Town Clerk Liam Costello said that the individual clubs had schemes through which funding would be available. It would be housed in a lockable unit with a key or combination given out in a controlled manner. Alan Richardson wondered whether such a unit should also be located at the Olney Centre. It was agreed that OTC would contribute £1500 for the installation of a community defibrillator at the Olney Centre and £1000 for one at the Recreation Ground.
    Olney Brass request for funding
    The council have been asked to consider a request from Olney Brass that they award a grant of £2.5K towards the running costs of the youth section of Olney Brass for the coming year, possibly from the Community (previously Sydney Dix) Fund. As part of the application Olney Brass were required to submit a copy of their accounts and on inspection the council agreed to the request.
    Exclusion of Public and Press Representatives
    Whenever matters are to be discussed that the council deems to be of a confidential nature the following item appears on the agenda: ‘To consider exclusion of Public and Press Representatives pursuant to the Public Bodies (admission to meetings) Act 1960 on the basis that publicity would be prejudicial to the public interests by the confidential nature of the business to be transacted’. Joe Stacey questioned whether the item to be discussed warranted the exclusion of the public and press, since it was a matter of public interest. Debbie Brock agreed, saying that she had often questioned the rationale behind such exclusions. Peter Geary was of the opinion that because the matter was of a financial nature relating to the tendering of contracts this justified the exclusion. The council resolved to seek guidance from Bucks Association of Local Councils on when exclusion is justified. For information, the draft minutes published on OTC’s website state: The council considered quotations for surfacing work at the Recreation Ground. As all three contractors had provided different specifications, they are to be asked to re-quote on a like for like basis. 
    Annual Town Meeting - Thursday 2nd May
    This will take place at 7:00 pm on Thursday 2nd May in the Olney Centre and all Olney residents are invited to attend to question the council on any matter of concern to them. If you want to know why the precept you pay to OTC as part of the Council Tax has risen by 5.8% this year, why we may lose part of the recreation ground to a car park or have any other concerns, then come along and exercise your democratic right. 
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for May 2013
    Public Participation
    Brian Rice In this slot, Brian Rice spoke about parking in Oakdown Crescent. First, some background on this issue: In last month's meeting, Councillors rejected the option of a new road through the Pyghtle, reluctant to relinquish the land and believing that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) wouldn't finance the £250,000 projected ballpark cost. Instead, they unanimously agreed that the best solution would be to provide parking spaces on the retained garden of 102 Weston Road. They also discussed to what extent the lack of a previously existing fence, now allowing access from Oakdown Crescent to the back of the properties 70 - 92 Weston Road, was affecting the parking problem.  Brian made a number of points. He stated that the agreed solution would provide parking for only around six cars, when around double that was needed. He also felt that the projected cost of the new road was far too high, around £80,000 being realistic which, as it happens, is remarkably close to the ballpark cost of the agreed solution. Finally, Brian felt that the fence referred to had never existed, so access had always been available. John Sharp disagreed, saying there'd not always been access. A 1945 picture of the area, courtesy of Google Earth, appears to show that there was access at that time, though that in itself implies nothing about the situation when Oakdown Crescent was built. Mercury thanks Liam Costello for background information on this point.
    Annual elections and appointments
    The Mayor and Deputy Mayor were elected, this time round Steve Clark and Jeremy Rawlings being re-elected to their respective roles. Committee Chairs and members were appointed, almost completely unchanged from last year.  Usually, Standing Orders are formally adopted with little change but, this time, adoption was postponed pending change and review. Specifically, Deidre Bethune wanted to make them less gender-specific (i.e. male) and, following a debate started by Joe Stacey, there was general discussion about whether or not Committees should provide reports to full Council meetings. This latter point meant that the Council will review the Scheme of Delegation to Committees and Staff. 
    Inventory review
    Always an interesting topic, Councillors reviewed Olney Town Council's (OTC's) inventory of land and assets. Council regulations state that fixed cost accounting must be used, meaning that each item is listed with its purchase cost, these not being depreciated over time. Peter Geary and Joe Stacey felt that it'd be helpful to also include each item's replacement value. Tony Evans brought the ensuing debate to a close, stating that "We have to accept that these figures are absolutely meaningless", and "move on". 
    The Kitchener Centre
    This has become a contentious topic, with enough background information and vociferous disagreement to fill an article on its own. To fit the most into the space available, and try to keep it interesting, this is a mix of what occurred in the meeting and the background to it.  provides day care in Olney. As reported last month, the contract to manage the Centre had been out for competitive tender, and the bid process had completed with ten expressions of interest but only one bid, from the incumbent provider, Age UK. That bid was rejected because it was around £100,000 more than the price for which MKC believed it could manage the Centre in-house. So, that's what it decided to do. OTC disagreed with this decision, so voted by majority to call it in. As a result, two meetings on this topic took place between OTC and MKC.  The first meeting was adjourned after some delay. Steve Clark attended, and believes the delay was due to evidence, thought to be from MKC Officers, having been submitted late to the members of the panel, allowing too little time for proper consideration. Peter Geary believes it was due to there being insufficient supporting information for the committee to reach a conclusion.  Jeremy Rawlings attended the second meeting. He'd presented the Council's case that MKC's decision to manage the Kitchener Centre in-house should be called in. Debbie Brock, MKC Councillor and OTC Ward Councillor, had then presented the opposing case. Both presentations had been 'robust'.  Jeremy noted that the Officers who were justifying MKC's costs said that various management items, for example human resources, payroll and training, could be absorbed by Council departments with no impact on their budgets and thus not appear in MKC's contract price. The cost quoted by Age UK for these items was £45,000, and Jeremy felt that 'absorbing' such significant and real cost was impossible for a smaller organisation such as Age UK. A vote was taken, OTC lost, so the decision stands: MKC will manage the Kitchener Centre. Peter Geary, also MKC Councillor and OTC Ward Councillor, replied with his view. Peter felt that OTC needed to understand what it had agreed to when it decided to present its case to call in the decision: It delayed the process, which resulted in MKC having to extend care provision using the current providers at both the Kitchener Centre and the Bletchley day care site, thus putting care at risk if either provider had refused this extension. Peter cited the £45,000 Age UK management figure, questioning why OTC had backed Age UK quoting this amount when the spend would not be necessary if MKC ran the service. He also stated that the credibility of OTC had taken a nosedive, due to it presenting flawed figures, thus succeeding in uniting the MKC parties round the table to an extent rarely achieved, with the vote being eight to one against calling in the decision - there was no case to answer. He noted that OTC would shortly be asking MKC Officers to expand the Kitchener Centre, 'within weeks of effectively calling the same Officers liars'.  Tony Evans had heard enough. Forcefully disagreeing with Peter, he said that the first meeting had been 'a farce', that MKC had its figures incorrect and that if Peter didn't like OTC, he should 'get off it'.  Steve Clark called the discussion to a halt. Note that, if you're wondering why Debbie didn't express her views, she was absent from this meeting.  Mercury thanks Steve Clark, Jeremy Rawlings and Peter Geary for background on this issue. 
    Naval Cadet Corps 
    A while ago, the Naval Cadet Corps had identified a derelict building near the Emberton Park cafe and, with permission, started repairing it to make it suitable for use as the centre for a new Olney based Cadet Group. The Corps aims to start the new group soon, accepting children from eight to eighteen years living in Olney and the surrounding villages.  The work thus far has been paid for by the Corps, and thus money is very tight. In order to help complete this work, the Corps are now seeking a £4,500 grant from OTC. Councillors were generally sympathetic to the request but required more information in order to make a decision. So, a Corps representative will be invited to the next meeting.
    Speed Indicator Display units
    Speed Indicator Display units (SIDs) are the live vehicle speed indication devices you sometimes see on lampposts. Behind the scenes, they also note recorded speeds and times, the resulting data often proving useful to analyse traffic patterns and general driver behaviour.  Due to a recruitment freeze in MKC's road safety team, and MKC's SIDs needing replacement, it's inviting Town Councils to either purchase their own SIDs or to participate in a loan and operate scheme, where they'd borrow the SIDs and be trained to deploy and operate the units themselves. The Council liked the loan and operate scheme, and will tell MKC it would like to participate. 
    Private and confidential?
    At the end of most OTC meetings, Councillors vote 'to consider exclusion of Public and Press Representatives pursuant to the Public Bodies (admission to meetings) Act 1960 on the basis that publicity would be prejudicial to the public interests by the confidential nature of the business to be transacted'. This mouthful is almost invariably agreed, and Mercury, along with any remaining members of the Public make their way home, while Councillors stay to discuss the confidential business. It tends to get used to cover items such as personnel matters, where its use is uncontroversial, and tenders, where it isn't.  Councillors had received guidance on the legislation and how to interpret it. The initial position should always be in favour of disclosing as much information as possible about the decisions the Council takes, and only in limited circumstances should information be withheld, where there's justification, in law, for doing so. The relevant considerations in favour of disclosure include openness and accountability for tender processes and prices.  After some debate, in which it was clear that there was general agreement in favour of openness, Councillors agreed that tenders would not generally be regarded as confidential, and that the names of the companies and organisations concerned would be anonymised. This common practice would prevent, for example, one company gaining business-critical information from another's quotation. 
    Anemometer
    It was mentioned in passing that a planning application had been received from RWE npower renewables for a temporary 80 metre anemometer on land at Bozeat Grange, just South of Bozeat. For more information, surf to planning.wellingborough.gov.uk/portal, click Application Search, enter Reference number WP/2013/0162 and click Search.
    Hanging baskets
    The hanging baskets in the town during the Summer months, bar those around the Market Square, are all sponsored by local companies, organisations and individuals. Ron Bull, who's kindly organised this sponsorship in recent years, is not able to run it this time due to health reasons. As a result, the Council has stepped in and is starting to organise sponsorship for this year. So, if you've had a basket in the last few years, it'll be the Council approaching you to see if you'd like to sponsor one again this time round.  If you're a company, organisation or individual who'd like to sponsor a basket this year, please contact the Council by calling Liam or Sandra on 01234 711679, or emailing them at townclerk@ olneytowncouncil.gov.uk. Each basket has an individual plaque showing the name of its sponsor.
    Buses 
    As a result of MKC budget cuts, the Number 1 bus service between Olney and Milton Keynes will be considerably reduced from 2nd June - surf to www.milton-keynes.gov. uk/bus/documents/1.pdf. Essentially, most of the evening buses will be cut, and there'll be no buses at all on Sundays. The Council will ask MKC if any of these evening buses could be reintroduced.  Next Meeting 3rd June The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd June in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for June 2013
    Public Participation
    Samantha Chapman Samantha Chapman spoke about the cuts to the bus serice between Olney and Milton Keynes which have taken place since the beginning of June. Samantha said that as someone who works in Milton Keynes she was a regular user of the late evening bus service, which had now been cut. As a result she was now unable to work late nights and Sundays. She felt that it was unfair to penalise residents of Olney who do not have access to a car, particularly when the majority of shops do not shut until 8.00 pm. This subject was an agenda item later in the meeting so it was agreed to move it to become the first item.  Bob Blackie The next person to speak was Bob Blackie from the United Reformed Church. Bob said that the URC would be holding a flower festival on Friday 12th and Saturday 13th July, followed by a service on Sunday 14th. He thanked the council for their generous donation towards the running of the event and invited all councillors to attend.
    Cuts to Bus service
    As reported last month and discussed in public participation, because of Milton Keynes Council budget cuts, the Number 1 Arriva bus service between Olney and Milton Keynes has been considerably reduced. The last bus leaves Central MK at 19:18 and there are no Arriva buses at all on Sundays. Northampton based Meridian Bus will now be running a new service 101 on Sunday from Lavendon to Central MK, but this is being run as a commercial initiative and is not subsidised by MKC. Deidre Bethune was unhappy that Olney Town Council had not been consulted but recognised that it would not be possible to get all services reinstated. She wondered if it would be possible to get a specific evening bus reinstated. MKC ward councillor Peter Geary said that the council had a £20m revenue challenge and the original proposals had been far worse. One possibility could be provision of a linking bus from Newport Pagnell to the villages, he said, but consideration would need to be given to the likely demand and cost. Tony Evans said he'd had a lot of representation from young people, who are not the sort of people who come to meetings of OTC (and looking round the room, Mercury was inclined to agree!). The cuts had made it difficult for them to get to MK for an evening out, he said. The issue will be raised at the next meeting of the N.E. Area Forum.
    Naval Cadet Corps 
    As reported last month, the Naval Cadet Corps have identified a derelict building near the Emberton Park cafe and, with permission, started repairing it to make it suitable for use as the centre for a new Olney based Cadet Group. The work thus far has been paid for by the Corps, and in order to complete this work, the Corps is now seeking a £4,500 grant from OTC. Cdr. David Moth was present to explain more about the group and how the money would be spent. David explained that the Corps had now leased the building for a peppercorn rent from MKC and were refurbishing it at no cost to them. The group  will give boys and girls from the age of 8 - 18 from Olney and the surrounding villages the chance to learn about and participate in activities such as climbing, sailing and camping. A similar unit at Leighton Buzzard was created a year and a half a with 5 cadets now has a membership of 40 he said. Deidre Bethune noted that a large amount of the requested grant was to be spent on catering equipment and wondered if this was necessary at the start of the venture. David explained that all of the equipment had to be new and child friendly, due to Health and Safety regs, because it would be used by the cadets as part of their training in seamanship. Jeremy Rawlings proposed that the council award the full amount of £4500 but it was not passed by a majority on the vote. A subsequent vote to award a lesser amount of £3000 was passed with the understanding that the Corps can seek further funding at a later date.
    Church Hall renovation
    The Parochial Church Council are undertaking a major refurbishment of the Church Hall in order for it to be used for a number of community uses, including a memory club for those experiencing memory loss and a youth cafe. The PCC is seeking a grant of £5000 towards the cost of renewing the floor in the entire building and provided a very thorough cost breakdown of the entire project. The total costs for the renovation are in the order of £163K, £119K of which has already been raised and the total cost of the floor renewal is £12.5K. The council voted to grant the full £5000 requested.
    The Olney Centre Community Asset Transfer
    OTC has been offered the opportunity to obtain the freehold of the Olney Centre from MKC under the Community Asset Transfer scheme. MKC had recently held a public meeting at the centre to explain the options and see if there were any parties interested in moving forward with the scheme. It came as a surprise to the members of OTC who attended that OTC is not the only interested party and a private developer was also in the running. Tony Evans was of the opinion that this meant that OTC had no option but to start the process as soon as possible and Jeremy Rawlings agreed, saying that it appeared that any commercial company could join in the bidding process. Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that under the rules of the scheme the bidding had to be open to all but unless the applicant met the strict community usage criteria they would not progress to the next stage. There are a number of safeguards in place and the process can be stopped at any time. Tony said that if OTC was successful then MKC would hand ownership to them but would not do any maintenance prior to the transfer. A survey conduct two years ago had revealed that the building was 'not about to fall down' but there were a number of things that needed doing. Ben Brock was of the opinion that a full survey should be carried out as part of the transfer process. Town Clerk Liam Costello reminded members that the building came with a 'sitting tenant' of the MKC Library Service. Tony Evans proposed that OTC progress with stage 1 of the transfer process, which was passed unanimously. 
    Future of MKC Parish Wardens 
    A letter has been received from MKC explaining that the Parish Warden posts were created nearly a decade ago from central government funding and subsequently picked up by themselves. MKC now wish to 'delete' the six remaining warden posts, four of which are currently occupied. This came as something of a surprise to most members of OTC as they had no idea that Olney even had a warden or what duties they actually perform. Peter Geary explained that the wardens spent on average half a day per week in their allocated parish and could perform duties such as enforcing dog fouling fines, supporting the police and PCSOs etc. Castlethorpe Parish Council is currently undertaking a trial of directly funding a warden on an hourly basis to enforce a dog control area. Deidre Bethune suggested that OTC might be interested if the Castlethorpe trial actually resulted in some penalty notices being issued. Jeremy Rawlings suggested that OTC request a breakdown of what the wardens have contributed to Olney over the past few months before deciding what to do, which was agreed. 
    Council protocols
    During the meeting there were a number of separate discussions around the way that OTC conducts its business and manages its finances and these are summarised here. During the item concerning the Internal Audit Joe Stacey said that the council did not appear to have proper and adequate control over the spending of sub committees. Tony Evans replied saying that he believed this was not the case. Each subcommittee has devolved authority to spend up to £2k and all expenditure has to be authorised by the full council. Later in the meeting Joe requested that any item that was not resolved at a meeting should be an agenda item at future meetings until it is resolved. He felt that there was a risk of items simply 'dropping off' as things stand. Earlier in the meeting he had noted an issue that had not appeared in the official minutes of a previous meeting but had been covered in the Mercury report of the same meeting. Debbie Brock suggested the setting up of an issues register. Joe thought that as a matter of routine all committees should summarise the decisions they have made to the full council. Jeremy Rawlings pointed out that the minutes of all committee meetings are circulated to the full council but Joe felt that this did not give members the chance to ask questions. Liam Costello said that there was a risk that each meeting could end up effectively being held twice. Peter Geary proposed that these issues should be covered in a future debate about the council's Standing Orders. 
    Odds and sods 
    Jeremy Rawlings said that in due course the Youth Club would be up for consideration as a candidate for the Community Asset Transfer scheme. He wondered if the same individual who had shown an interest in the Olney Centre would also be bidding.  Liam Costello reported that High Street South will be closed for resurfacing from 19th to 28th August and during this time all traffic will be diverted along Weston Road and Aspreys.  The new Mayor of Milton Keynes, Brian White, will be in attendance at next month's meeting to address the council.  And finally ... Tony Evans observed that the banks along Driftway were looking good but MKC should be reminded of the requirement for regular mowing if they are to remain that way.  Next Meeting - 1st July The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 1st July in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for July 2013
    Introduction
    Steve Clark started the meeting by saying how wonderful it was to see Ron bull take his place back in the Council Chamber.
    Public Participation
    Brian Rice Now almost a regular at these meetings, Brian Rice spoke about parking in Oakdown Crescent. In an earlier meeting, Councillors had referred to ballpark costs for two possible ways to address the issue: £80,000 to provide parking in the retained garden of 102 Weston Road, and £250,000 to provide an access road through the Pyghtle. Sceptical of these figures, Brian asked if Olney Town Council (OTC) had investigated whether they were correct. Questioning the lack of consultation on the proposals, he reported that residents thought the 102 Weston Road proposal was 'funny'.  Liam Costello explained that OTC was still waiting for Milton Keynes Council (MKC) to propose a scheme and, once it did, it would be put to public consultation in due course. Peter Geary and Debbie Brock, OTC's Ward Councillors on MKC, said that a scheme should be proposed by MKC in this financial year.  Brian White Brian White, Milton Keynes Mayor, attended the start of the meeting. He wanted to show that the Mayoralty wasn't just for Milton Keynes town, but for the whole borough and, to do this, he aimed to be seen in every Parish. He also promoted the need for a two way flow of information between MKC and OTC. He spoke briefly about his two nominated Charities for the year: the International Campaign to Ban Land Mines (www.icbl.org), and Ted's Gang (www.tedsgang.co.uk), a local Charity supporting children with Shwachman Diamond Syndrome. 
    Youth Centre grant application
    Jeremy Rawlings introduced this item before, along with others, leaving the meeting having earlier declared a pecuniary interest. MKC doesn't fund youth work for the under 13s and, about 15 years ago, Olney Youth Centre felt it would be good to provide a service for that age group. So, it started an under 13s night on the first and third Mondays of each month, staffed by volunteers without the benefit of Council funding. These nights grew in popularity and now regularly attract 50-60 children. As they grew, they became harder to manage without professional help and, for the last two years, OTC has funded a professional Youth Worker to run them alongside the volunteers. The Youth Centre would like to continue funding this position, and is applying for a £1 200 grant to cover it for another year. With the various Councillors having left the meeting, those remaining discussed the item briefly before approving the application.
    Parish Wardens 
    Peter Geary introduced this item, explaining that about three quarters of the 17 Parish Wardens in Milton Keynes Borough area are currently employed by Parishes, the balance being employed by MKC and generally working in the smaller Parishes. These roles were cut from MKC's budget last year and one year's grace given to allow Parishes to buy in to paint for their work as a service. For example, OTC might decide to pay £4680 per year for half a day a week  of Parish Warden time. Either way, it needs to decide on the first year by the end of September. Examples of a Parish Warden's duties include weekly patrols for dog fouling and littering, and checks for household waste being put out early. This was discussed at length, the main points including that the Wardens may be trained to implement road closures, and an interesting explanation of how dog fouling enforcement works. In order to issue a ticket for dog fouling in an area not under a dog control order, a Warden has to be visible and prominent, watch the deed being done, watch the owner walk away, offer a bag and challenge the owner to pick up, and only on their refusal can the Warden issue a ticket. Most owners pick up when challenged, hence so few tickets being issued. Compare that with the more straightforward situation in which an area might be covered by a dog control order which, amongst other things, mandates that no dogs are allowed.  Jeremy Rawlings proposed that OTC sign up for half a day a week of Warden time for a year. A vote was taken, and carried with all in favour bar two abstentions. 
    Road closure
    The A509 will be closed for resurfacing between its junctions with Weston Road and Lavendon Road for approximately 8 days, the proposed start date being Monday 19th August. Local traffic will be diverted via Weston Road, Aspreys and Driftway, and through traffic diverted via the outskirts of Bramham on the A422 and A428.
    Traffic regulation order 
    In order to alleviate problems due to vehicles parking on or near various West Street junctions and on the North side of Spring Lane towards the High Street, MKC is considering introducing waiting restrictions, denoted by double yellow lines. Further, due to a request from a nearby resident, the existing restrictions on Spinney Hill Road opposite the School are being changed to allow more flexibility with parking outside the School's pick up and drop off times. 
    Scheme of delegation
    The proposed scheme set out the circumstances in which the Town Clerk and various Committees are authorised to act with delegated authority. So, while it seems pretty mundane, it's actually very important to the smooth running of the Council. For example, the scheme proposed that the Town Clerk can authorise emergency expenditure of up to £2,000 without requiring the approval of full Council.  The ensuing discussion centred mainly on one particular aspect of the scheme: the way in which Committees report their work to full Council meetings. Steve Clark explained that, in the past, this reporting would sometimes result in full Council reopening and debating recommendations made by the Committees, thus wasting time and lengthening Council meetings. Joe Stacey felt that since Committees would now be reporting on decisions rather than recommendations, these debates simply would not happen, and meetings would in fact be shorter.  The scheme of delegation was approved. 
    Bus services 
    Following on from the issue covered in previous Mercury reports, meetings are being held to see if it would be possible to reinstate a small number of the cut services. Peter Geary noted that the critical cost was that which MKC would need to pay to subsidise a service, per person per journey, and that, if this was less than £2.50, reinstatement may be possible. 
    Core planning strategy
    MKC will be talking with Olney and Newport Pagnell Town Councils about additional land allocation for small housing developments, with the Town Councils having a say on where these pieces of land might be. Peter Geary stressed the importance of this issue - local Councils should be able to have their say on housing and retail planning in their areas. 
    Hanging baskets 
    Ron Bull usually organises sponsorship for the hanging baskets on the High Street and Yardley Road, and recruits a team of people to put them up. It wasn't possible for him to do so this year, so alternative arrangements were made. He thanked Liam and Sandra for arranging sponsorship, and Mark Luckin, TOG, the Lions and others for putting them up. 
    Next Meeting - 2nd September The next meeting wlll be held at 7 .30pm on Monday 2nd September in the Councll Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always weloome to attend and, If they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    There was no Olney Town Council meeting in August 2013
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for September 2013
    Monday 1st July 2013
    It was the start of a new term and the chums of Olney town Council were excitedly telling each other what ripping adventures they'd got up to during the long summer vac…..
    Bench outside the Carlton House Club
    For many years Olney Town Council (OTC) had received requests for a bench somewhere in the middle of the High Street, so that pedestrians could rest on the long walk from one end of town to the other. The location of the bench had been the cause of considerable debate and eventually OTC had agreed to site it at the front of the Carlton House Club. At the time there had been objections from the club and the United Reformed Church, both fearing that it would lead to an increase in rowdy behaviour outside their premises. The council had agreed to review the situation after six months so Town Clerk Liam Costello had written to both organisations in July. No response had been received from The Carlton House Club and the URC had responded saying that they had not observed any adverse impacts. A number of councillors said they had observed the bench being used and felt it had been a success.
    Cattle Market car park
    This car park is owned by Milton Keynes Council (MKC) and some years ago bollards were placed at the Freemans Garden entrance to stop drivers ‘joy riding’ around the car park. This has caused issues to drivers who, finding that there are no spare spaces, have to back out on to Silver End. A number of suggestions had been considered by the Neighbourhood Action Group but the eventual proposal that they recommended to OTC was to lose half a parking space to the right of the current ‘keep clear’ bay to create a wider area for vehicles to turn in – creating 1.5 spaces for vehicles to turn in but losing an additional parking space. The half space could be used for a motorcycle bay. OTC agreed to support the NAG proposal.
    Olney Centre Zebra Crossing
    In order to increase the visibility for car drivers and pedestrians alike, bollards have been placed to prevent cars parking close to the crossing. However, due to the ‘imaginative parking’ for which Olney residents have become renowned it is still possible to squeeze cars into the gaps between the road and the pavement via the crossing itself.  The NAG has requested that more bollards be erected in order to prevent such opportunities. MKC Traffic Management Team have supported this suggestion and proposed that eight new bollards be installed. Colin Rodden was not in favour of the plan saying that he felt there were enough “large bits of metal” in the area already. He suggested that the solution would be to enforce the existing parking restrictions.   Though some members were sympathetic to this idea the consensus was that the traffic wardens do not attend regularly enough to do this. Mayor Steve Clark proposed that OTC support the installation of the extra bollards and Rosemary Osbourne seconded the proposal. It was passed by a majority with one vote against.
    Road junction improvements
    Plans for two schemes had been received from MKC. The first is a remodelling of the road system by The Knoll at the north end of town. The proposal is intended to make Yardley Road less appealing to HGVs and ensure that they use the more suitable A509 Wellingborough Road.  Tony Evans agreed with the aim saying that drivers were using Yardley road to save “a Farthings worth of diesel”. (For readers born after 1960 Mercury should explain that a Farthing was a quarter of an old penny, or 1/960 of a pound!).  The plan involves reducing the width of the roadway in a number of places and creating more traditional T junctions. Some of the space thus gained is proposed to be used to create additional parking spaces, eight of which will be on newly created space adjacent. MKC Ward Councillor Peter Geary said the costs would be in the region of £70k – to £80k and members seemed generally in favour of the scheme, although Tony Evans said it was important to maintain the character of The Knoll. The second scheme is for the long awaited improvements to the Weston Road/High Street junction by the Hallelujah Lamppost. The intention here is to slightly relocate the lamppost and remodel the island such that traffic turning left or right from Weston Road would need to keep to the left of the island. Traffic travelling from the south and turning left into Weston Road would do so as now. Traffic travelling from the north and wishing to turn right into Weston Road would do so via a new filter lane, keeping to the left of the new island. A new tactile paved crossing point would be provided on Weston Road by the entrance to the Coop and another on the High Street to the south of the junction with a central refuge.  This scheme caused more discussion than the first with Peter Geary observing that it was the eighth such proposal for this junction and none had been perfect, although he was less convinced of the merits of this one than some of the previous ones. Jeremy Rawlings disliked the amount of road markings and said he had quite enjoyed the lack of white lines during the recent resurfacing work, but Ward Councillor Debbie Brock said it was necessary for such a complex junction.  Mercury noted that it did not appear to address the issue of access to and from the Coop car park which was one of the problems with the previous schemes.
    Landscape maintenance and associated services
    MKC has recently approved a procurement process to test the market in terms of both cost and service standards as part of a ‘value for money’ review of the landscape services that include grass cutting, shrub, hedge and tree maintenance and weed control. OTC has been asked whether it wishes MKC to retain responsibility for the services, which would be put out to tender, or take responsibility for the services themselves. If they opted to take responsibility themselves they would receive an apportionment of the current budget, expected to be in the region of £24.25k.  Tony Evans was of the opinion that it would be good for OTC to control all maintenance but felt that the figure quoted would only “scratch the surface” of the actual cost. The expense of employing an extra person, purchasing the necessary equipment and depreciation thereof could easily exceed £50k, he thought. Debbie Brock was keen that OTC should not dismiss the idea without doing a full desktop estimate of how much it would cost. John Boardman asked if OTC had received any complaints about the existing level of service, which caused considerable amusement amongst members who have regularly listened to Tony Evans’ complaints about the state of the banks on Driftway.  He quickly qualified the question with “from the public” and Peter Geary replied that there had been numerous complaints in the last year. Jeremy Rawlings was of the opinion that if MKC continued to provide the service the standard would get steadily worse as they continued to cut costs, but Peter Geary said that by outsourcing MKC would get better value and standards would improve. Ron Bull said that OTC should take on the work and it was a golden opportunity for them to employ a young person as an apprentice.  Tony Evans suggested that the matter should be fully investigated with all the facts and figures, since OTC prides itself on the way it looks after its assets. It was agreed to invite Andy Hudson, Head of Environment and Waste at MKC to attend a future meeting to address the council.
    Play areas
    MKC has received a Section 106 financial contribution of £35,584.33 as planning gain from the residential development off Yardley road. This money has to be spent on improvements to public space and play areas in the town and expires in May 2017. In a letter to OTC they pointed out that some of the equipment at Dagnall Road and the recreation ground is nearing the end of its useable life and does not comply with current regulations. There are also issues with the structural fencing and equipment at the Cowper Tannery site. Tony Evans was concerned that MKC was suggesting using the money to replace equipment nearing the end of its life, since MKC were obliged to replace that, anyway. The money should be used for improvements, not maintenance he said. Peter Geary said that the money does not have to be spent just on play areas. It could be used on any open spaces, he said, and he also warned against spending it all in one go as there would not be any further Section 106 income for a long time. Tony Evans suggested getting input from the parents of children who use the play areas, as happened some years ago when some of the equipment on the recreation ground was replaced.
    Odds and sods
    A letter has been received from a young resident of Lavendon asking the council to provide a cycle path between Lavendon and Olney.
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for October 2013
    Public Participation
    Brian Rice Brian Rice, the only speaker in this slot, had come to discuss parking in and around Oakdown Crescent. He reported that the previous Friday evening, a large van had parked on a corner in the Crescent in such a way as to make it hard to drive cars, let alone emergency vehicles, round it. Noting that the Crescent was full of cars most evenings, he said that the parking issue needed to be addressed within the next 12 months.
    Colts changing rooms
    Olney Town Colts Football Club (FC) has raised sufficient funds to build changing rooms, and contacted Olney Town Council (OTC) to discuss where they would be best located. After discussion, the Recreations and Services Committee recommended they be placed in an extension to the left of the tractor shed, approximately symmetrical with the toilet blocks to its right. The Council approved this recommendation, with all in favour bar Ron Bull, who was against the location on principle, feeling that the Football Clubs should be located together. As background, Olney Town Colts FC has 23 teams covering the junior age range from U6 to U18, while Olney Town FC has various senior teams. The two clubs were due to meet on the same evening as this Council meeting.
    Traffic regulation order
    As reported in an earlier Mercury, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) has recently been considering various requests to restrict parking in parts of Olney. The proposals have been out for consultation and the results are now in. The double yellow lines on Spinney Hill Road opposite the School will, in fact, be retained. New double yellow lines will be painted on the North side of Spring Lane between the High Street and West Street, and at various West Street junctions between Dinglederry and Spring Lane.
    Community Asset Transfer
    Jeremy Rawlings reported that the Youth Centre had been added, to tranche seven of MKC’s Community Asset Transfer programme. He believed there were four or more parties interested in taking over the running of the Centre. Steve Clark noted that MKC still had the option to keep the Centre, being under no obligation to transfer it. Jeremy concluded the topic, by noting that two or more of the parties appeared to have ambitions to build on the field to the rear of the Centre, suspecting they were as yet unaware of the buried sewer pipe running East-West across the site to the pumping station behind, and the associated restriction that no building was allowed within four metres of its route.
    Citizens Advice Bureau
    As reported previously, the local Citizens Advice Outreach Service is supported financially by OTC, and had provided a report on its work between April 2012 and February 2013. It had seen 57 clients in that time, almost all from the Olney Ward, 34% aged 35-49, 26% aged 25-34 and 72% female. The biggest topics enquired about by its clients were benefits (43%) and debt (27%). It was noted that OTC had effectively paid approximately £100 per client, and that it would have been cheaper for it to pay for taxis to have those people seen in Milton Keynes, although that would not preserve their anonymity. John Boardman felt, and various Councillors agreed, that a representative from the Bureau should be invited to speak with the Council before the next anniversary of the funding, to allow Councillors to get a better picture of its operation.
    Bits’n’bobs
    Liam Costello noted that the allotment track is due for resurfacing in the next month or so. A site meeting has been held with the contractor, and tenants of nearby properties will be informed. Jeremy Rawlings had attended the opening night of the new Youth Café in the redeveloped Church Hall. Around 30 children came along, and Jeremy was impressed with both the Café and the Hall’s fresh new look. A new Café, La Cantina, has opened in Rose Court. It’s made use of the ‘pop up’ measures introduced by Eric Pickles to promote regeneration, where various kinds of retail outlet, including restaurants, can open for up to two years before gaining the usual planning consent – for example, change of use. However, it did not give the required 21 days’ notice to MKC Planners, who have since visited the Café and asked it to provide the information retrospectively. Steve Clark, also a member of OTC’s Planning Committee, noted that this area of planning was currently something of a minefield, with those setting up new businesses under these measures not necessarily aware of what permissions and licences they need to apply for. Next Meeting - 4th November The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th November in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for November 2013
    Olney Colts FC changing rooms 
    As reported last month, Olney Town Colts Football Club has raised sufficient funds to build changing rooms, so they are no longer reliant on the facilities of Olney Town FC. The Recreations and Services Committee of Olney Town Council (OTC) had recommended that it be built adjacent to the existing tractor shed and should reflect the style of the existing building. Following that meeting, the colts had engaged an architect to draw up some illustrative plans of the proposals, and he and Ian Stokes were present at the meeting to present these to the council. The building will contain two junior changing rooms, a kitchen, a changing room for match officials, showers and an over-flow changing room that could double as a function room. The entire building will be disabled friendly, said Ian. The plans met with general approval of the council and, having already agreed in principle to the proposals, agreed that The Colts could now proceed to the next stage of producing detailed plans and apply for planning permission. Deidre Bethune asked if the issue of the blocked sewer, which the building would connect to, had been resolved. For information the sewer, which serves all of the clubs and the public toilets on the recreation ground, runs along the boundary of the football pitch but diverts under the fence and private properties before joining with the main sewer in East Street. It is partially blocked by tree roots under the private properties and occasionally backs up and overflows during periods of exceptional use. Jeremy Rawlings explained that the blocked section was the responsibility of Anglian Water, who have admitted responsibility but prefers to reactively respond to blockages on each occasion and will only consider remedial work when it becomes financially advantageous to do so. 
    Berrells Court resurfacing and drainage
    The extremely poor condition of Berrells Court, off East Street, has long been a cause of concern with huge areas of standing water often covering much of the surface. It has never been adopted by Milton Keynes Council (MKC), and according to the Land Registry it does not have an owner. Planning Permission for a new property was granted almost two years ago, and a condition of this Permission was that the road surface should be brought up to standard with tarmac and drainage before construction could start. When OTC last discussed the matter in December 201 2, the proposal was to bring the surface up to adoption standard and seek adoption. The council has since obtained quotes for a tarmac surface with five soakaways but the fact that the soakaways would be directly under the road does not meet the standard for adoption. Town Clerk Liam Costello has contacted the residents of Berrells Court with a view to getting them to contribute to the costs and all but one or two had agreed. Joe Stacey questioned whether the specification needed to be so high for a residential road that gets very little use, particularly now that adoption is not being proposed. Liam agreed to seek alternative quotes for a lower spec. Ben Brock and Deidre Bethune wondered if residents who contributed to the work would be able to claim ownership once it was done. (For a wonderful moment Mercury had a vision of them installing a toll booth and charging the recalcitrant few for access to their properties!) Jeremy Rawlings expressed his displeasure with the whole proposal, declaring it 'a farce'. 
    Landscaping Services
    As previously reported, MKC has recently approved a procurement process to test the market in terms of both cost and service standards, as part of a 'value for money' review of the landscape services, that include grass cutting, shrub, hedge and tree maintenance and weed control. OTC has been asked whether it wishes MKC to retain responsibility for the services, which would be put out to tender, or take responsibility for the services themselves. A working party of Cllrs Evans, Geary, Boardman, Bull and Clark were appointed to look at the pros and cons of each option and have produced a detailed report which recommends that OTC take on the devolved service in house for an initial three year period, employing a part-time worker and leasing any additional equipment required. At the end of the three-year period, OTC can chose to hand the service back to MKC if it does not prove successful. The recommendation was put to a vote and passed unanimously. 
    Neighbourhood Plan
    The Localism Act introduced a right for communities to draw up 'Neighbourhood Plans' that can become part of the formal planning framework for the area. Once adopted, these Neighbourhood Plans form part of the statutory Development Plan for the area and give the local community more say and control over development in the area. They cannot be used to counteract or override existing core strategies but are more to provide a local input to the implementation of those strategies. At a previous meeting, Joe Stacey had strongly urged OTC to produce such a plan and had agreed to be part of a working group to investigate the feasibility. Joe had consulted members of other communities that had produced plans, including Stony Stratford, Woburn Sands and Winslow, and noted that some had obtained significant funding and produced large documents, whereas others had produced smaller documents in house at little or no cost. The working party had recommended that OTC allocate a budget of £7,000 for a Steering Group, consisting of five Town Councillors and four selected representatives of the community, to produce a Neighbourhood Plan for the parish of Olney. A vote was taken to proceed with the recommendation, which was passed unanimously.  A point of interest: The Working Party report refers to the MKC Core Strategy, which states that collectively Newport Pagnell, Olney and Woburn Sands are earmarked for an additional 1760 new homes over the next few years. These three settlements were chosen on the basis that they have the largest range of facilities and best public transport links in the rural area. All, bar Olney, have already embarked on producing Neighbourhood Plans, and based on historical growth patterns Olney would be expected to grow by approximately 250 properties in that time. As Olney has been identified as a key settlement, numerous landowners have put forward parcels of land to be considered for housing development. The suggested sites will now be examined in detail to see how sustainable they are, e.g. in terms of proximity of main services such as water, electricity and sewage and also how they would link in to the current highway network. One or more of the sites will then be included in the development plan as being suitable. To this end, most (if not all) of the landowners to the west of Aspreys have put forward plots of land to be considered, and the land thus far put forward is sufficient to build over 2000 dwelling, although this does not guarantee that they will be deemed acceptable and included in the development plan. The action of the landowners is not surprising bearing in mind the considerable increase in the value of green belt agricultural land that such designation would confer. Of course, any development at the Weston Road end of Aspreys would further accelerate the gradual sprawl of Olney towards Weston Underwood. Mercury is grateful to Steve Clark for clarification of the Milton Keynes Development Strategy.
    Kitchener Centre
    Earlier this year the council had discussed a possible extension to the Kitchen Centre, due to an increase in the need for day care for the elderly. Dr Brian Partridge and Centre Manager Helena Newbould, had attended to support the proposal, and explained that there were then two waiting lists in operation: The first for people wishing to join the service, and at the time there were nine on the list with another six in progress. The second list was for people who already used the centre but wanted additional sessions and that then stood at 12. Since then, the incumbent operator has lost the contract for running the centre and it has been bought in house by MKC. For some reason which was not made clear, there is no longer any waiting list and consequently no business justification for expansion. Debbie Brock, Cabinet Member of MKC with Portfolio responsibility for Adult, Older Years and Health, said that opportunities for additional services that do not involve expansion of the building were being explored.
    Parish Wardens
    Parish Wardens are employed by MKC and spend on average half a day per week in their allocated parish, performing duties such as enforcing dog fouling fines, supporting the police and PCSOs etc. Earlier this year MKC had informed OTC that it was proposing to 'delete' the six remaining warden posts, only four of which were then occupied, unless the parishes provided funding for them to continue. At the time, OTC requested a breakdown of what the wardens had contributed to Olney over the past few months, before deciding what to do. 23 other parishes had done likewise, and only three had expressed an interest in purchasing the services of the wardens so MKC has decided to end the service from 31 st March 2014. 
    Odds and sods
    Tony Evans reported that a vacancy has arisen at the Ann Hopkins Smith Almshouses and applications are invited from ladies of the parish who are over 60 of age in need of accommodation.  Deidre Bethune reported that the organisers of the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) would like to extend the event to cover the whole weekend of 6th & 7th of September next year. They currently have no clear plans for the Sunday but suggested it could encompass the Farmers' Market and other events. Steve Clark suggested a meeting between reps from BOFF, the Farmers' Market and OTC Rees and Services committee.  Debbie Brock passed on her thanks to The Olney Group (TOG) for another highly successful fireworks display.  Next Meeting - 2nd December The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd December in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    Mercury report for the Olney Town Council meeting for December 2013
    Public Participation
    Paul Collins, Chair of Trustees at the Cowper and Newton Museum, was the only member of the public to speak in this slot. After a recent unintended schedule clash between two musical events in the town, he urged the Council to consider implementing a central calendar for town events which local organisations would be free to use, thus reducing the possibility of such schedule related surprises in future. 
    Olney Dementia Project
    The Council listened to a presentation from Joy Oehlman on the Olney Dementia Project, organised by the Friends of Cobbs Garden Surgery and made possible through generous donations from local businesses. It's in response to David Cameron's Dementia Challenge, and Joy is employed on a fixed term one year contract. Olney has a higher than average proportion of older people and, nationally, increases in dementia detection rates (currently 44%) are expected to significantly boost the proportion diagnosed with dementia.  Two thirds of those diagnosed with dementia live in the community , with many of them feeling let down and misunderstood by those around them. The Project aims to increase awareness and understanding of dementia, trying to address issues such as shopping - dementia sufferers tend to feel more comfortable shopping locally - and signage. While not the first initiative in the UK, that honour falling to York, it is the first in Milton Keynes borough. 
    Big Olney Food Festival 2014
    Following on from last month, the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) has now formally asked the Council if it can extend its September 2014 event to two days. Sunday, the second day, would see the Farmers' Market stalls housed under BOFF's covered area, encouraged to serve hot food and to stay at the venue late into the afternoon. The Council agreed to this request.
    Proposed Road Changes
    Although only mentioned briefly in this meeting, two proposed road changes have entered their consultation period -the High Street junctions with Yardley and Weston Roads. If you visited the Council's stall at Dickens of a Christmas, you'd have seen their details on display.
    Hearing Loop System
    As reported previously, the Council has been trying to install an improved hearing loop system in the Olney Centre. This has been progressing very slowly, with an external company having agreed to install a trial system but not yet having done so. In order to guarantee some progress, Councillors voted that, if the trial system was not ready by the January full Council meeting, Jeremy Rawlings would investigate the purchase of one or two boundary microphones and equipment to connect them to the existing hearing loop, thus hopefully providing a useful fixed system for the Council Chamber. 
    East Street Parking
    Parking near the Sports fields at certain times during weekends continues to be a hot issue. Various possible solutions were discussed, and those which seemed most relevant are noted here. Firstly, the Rugby Club has offered an area in the West end of Doffs Field which could be used at weekends for sports related parking. Secondly, Tony Evans suggested the compulsory purchase of the vacant land North of and adjacent to the existing East Street car park, and currently classified as being for housing use. Peter Geary felt that the parking problem was a neighbourhood planning issue, that there was a logical process to pass through and that, since it was a problem for only around four hours per week, there may be easier solutions such as traffic management. He also noted that, with its housing classification, this vacant parcel of land was extremely valuable and, to purchase it, the Council would likely need to request that another piece of land be classified as being for housing use. If this was done, then the money from the sale could be used to fund the purchase of the land adjacent to the car park. Tony Evans felt that having decided to reclassify this land as being for housing use, thus significantly inflating its value, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) should fund the land purchase. The only thing which seemed certain at the end of the discussion, was that this issue will run and run. 
    Traffic Management Training 
    Since the Police are generally no longer providing assistance with closing roads for local events, two three-hour training courses are being run in December, which will qualify those who complete them to be able to close roads with speed limits of 30MPH and below. They'll be attended by representatives from various local groups, and from the Council. 
    Rugby News
    Duncan Taylor, previously a junior player at Olney Rugby Club, graduated to playing with Bedford Blues, now plays for Saracens and has six caps for Scotland. Councillors congratulated this major achievement.  Next Meeting - 6th January 2014 The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th January in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 

    Mercury's reports for 2012
    Olney Council report for Monday 9th January 2012
    New Town Clerk
    Mayor Steve Clark opened the meeting by wishing all present a happy New Year and welcomed the new Town Clerk, Liam Costello. As reported last month, Liam has seven years' Council experience, previously holding the post of Clerk to Marlborough Town Council. 
    Public participation
    Gerald Wilson The first person to speak was Gerald Wilson of C.T. Wilson and sons who spoke about the issue of parking in the High Street. This was discussed at last month's meeting with comments being made about the fact that the parking spaces are not marked out, leading to some vehicles parking so as to not make the best use of the spaces available. Gerald said that during the winter months it is necessary to park his coal truck outside of his shop sideways on, due to the length of the vehicle. Although this occupies more than one space it does create a layby of sorts, he said, enabling customers who wish to load coal and other heavy purchases into their cars to pull in. In the past there had been discussions about 'A' boards and displays of goods outside of some shops, he said. Whilst agreeing with Milton Keynes Council's (MKC) ban on 'A' boards, he felt Lhat his display added to the aesthetics of the High Street and it was necessary to display goods to show that the shop was open. He reminded the council that 30 years ago, via the Chamber of Trade, he had obtained an agreement with Bucks County Council, forerunner of MKC, to have a display and as far as he was concerned that arrangement still stood.  Roger Mann Second to speak was Roger Mann, who also wished to express his opinion about High Street parking and in particular the suggestion made at last month's meeting to realign and mark the spaces so that vehicles would have to reverse in to them and then drive out forwards. He reminded the council that last lime markings had been discussed they had decided that it would not be appropriate in the conservation area. The current alignment enabled drivers to spot a space and indicate, albeit belatedly, and pull in lorwards. If the parked cars were 'slewed' the other way it would not be possible to see a space until the driver was level with, or even past, the space. This would lead to drivers looking out of their passenger windows or rear view mirror, rather than the road ahead, he felt. Assuming the following vehicle had left space for the driver to reverse they would then need to complete the manoeuvre quickly so as not to hold up the traffic. A lot of drivers have considerable trouble with reversing and not particularly the elderly, he said. The danger was that the alignment of the traffic on the opposite side of the road would now present a better view of spaces, so drivers would probably pull across and park front-ways in to a space. When they subsequently backed out they would either have to reverse across both lanes ol traffic or find themselves lacing oncoming traffic. In conclusion he said that anything that improves the parking or traffic situation in the town is to be encouraged, but this would do neither, possibly making the latter worse. Gerald Wilson observed cryptically that his truck was probably the only vehicle parked legally in the High Street, anyway, as he left the meeting!
    Olympic Games - Olney Celebration
    Tony Evans reported on plans by the Baptist and Parish Churches to hold a combined event on the Recreation Ground to celebrate the opening of the Olympic Games on the evening of Friday July 27th. It would be a celebratory, family friendly, community event by the people of Olney for the people of Olney that reflects the aims of the Olympic Village in terms of its sporting and cultural agenda running from 4:30pm to 11 :30 pm. The council agreed to support the event so long as the sports clubs are in agreement but if significant financial support is required then an approach would need to be made to the council in the proper manner. Finance was a recurring theme during this month's meeting. 
    Cobbs Garden Surgery - Specialist Nurse for the Elderly 
    For a number of years the surgery employed an ex-District Nurse funded by Milton Keynes PCT. Last year the PCT withdrew the funding and it looked as though this valuable service would be lost. At the request of Cobbs Garden Patient Participation Group the Olney Town Council (OTC) had agreed to fund the post for a year at a cost of £13,500. Steve Clark noted with some concern that a journalist from BBC Three Counties Radio had recently visited the surgery and interviewed one of the partners who had given the impression that OTC had declined to renew the funding, due to budget constraints. Steve said that no such decision had been made and ii the journalist concerned had bothered to contact the council or visit the offices whilst he/she had been in town then they could have clarified the situation. Mike Hughes suggested that the partner had probably assumed that funding would not be renewed since the original decision had just been to fund it for a year with no obligation to fund on an on-going basis. 
    Continental Market
    Traditional Markets Ltd has applied to hold a continental market In Olney on Sunday 18th March. Debbie Brock recalled that there had been a few complaints from the public about lack of pricing signage on some of the stalls when a similar event was held last year. Mike Hughes said that some of the businesses around the market had complained that they had lost most of their trade that day to the market. The general feeling was that the council would support the event but the ofler of £250 from Traditional Markets was insufficient and  £450 should be charged. This was agreed by a majority. After the vote Tony Evans said that he assumed the ban on the selling of hot food would apply, as it did for the Sunday and Thursday markets. Debbie Brock said she thought ii was reasonable to relax this rule for a one-off event but Tony said this would send out the wrong message to the existing market traders and the ban should apply to all such events on the Market Place. Andrew Dooley asked if Tony thought it should also apply to the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) in that easel He proposed that the council agreed to the sale of hot food and the vote was carried by a majority. 
    Localism Act - Council Code of Conduct 
    Jeremy Rawlings explained the changes that would be necessary for councillors to meet their obligations to promote and maintain high standards of conduct. The key tasks that OTC has to achieve before 31 st March are: 
    • Adopt or amend a Code of Conduct 
    • Adopt or amend a Register of Interests for publication 
    • Set rules (standing orders) for disclosure of interests 
    • Manage standards and ethical governance as part of the wider corporate governance of the Council 
    MKC have an existing code which meets these requirements and considers that parish councils will have met their obligations ii they adopt MKC's Code, Register and Rules. Jeremy said that the new rules were considerably more stringent than those currently in place and it would be a criminal offence not to declare an interest in matters coming before the council. A number of councillors round the table will be obliged to be much more open in the information they provide regarding properties and land that they own etc, he said. 
    Finance Committee
    The Parish Precept (the amount of Olney residents' Council Tax which goes directly to OTC) has been retalned at the existing rate of £147,610 for the last 6 years. This has been achieved by using a reserve of funds that OTC has built up over the 'good' years and Mercury assumes that it was an effort to ease the burden on Council Tax payers during what, at the time, was thought to be an economically difficult period. However, these reserves have now exhausted and the current financial crisis means that there will actually be a deficit next year. Deidre said that the Finance Committee were proposing that the Precept should now be increased by 10%. Ron Bull suggested that it should be less that 10% so that the rest could be recouped in future years and Andrew Dooley said he would find it hard to support any increase, as the council should be cutting expenditure in the same way as householders are having to. Steve Clark closed down the conversation by saying that since this was the recommendation of the Finance Committee the full council and the full council should only be voting on it and questioning discussing it again. A vote was taken and passed by a majority.  Mercury is grateful to Town Clerk, Liam Costello, for providing the following information:  The total Precept will rise by 10% from  £147,610 to £162,371. However, due to an increase in the Council tax base figure  (which is the number of equivalent Band D Households in the parish) the actual increase to households will be 9.30%. This equates to 10p a week for a Band D property. 
    Odds and sods
    A quote of £2602 for the planting of summer bedding plants (red, white and blue) to mark the Queen's Diamond Jubilee had been received. Colin Rodden suggested that in the light of the previous item that an alternative quote should be obtained.  (Perhaps it would only be one third of the cost for a single colour, such as red, mused Mercury.) Tony Evans said that there were considerable cost savings obtained by continuity of the existing contract and any alternative contractor would need to do a considerable amount of pre-work which would be bound to be reflected in the quote. The council voted by a majority to accept the quote.  Debbie Brock said that MKC have served notice through the High Court in London to The Planning Inspectorate, Npower and the various Land Owners that they (MKC) have lodged an appeal agalnst the Planning Inspectors Decision to grant permission for the Nun Wood Windfarm .  Rosemary Osborne said that the issue of the path which runs between the bottom of Wagstaff Way and the play park and is liable to flooding should have been discussed at a meeting of MKC on 4th January but was missed off the agenda. She has been assured that it will be discussed in the February meeting.  Tony Evans said that he thought the banks on Driftway were looking 'better' at the moment but doubted that it would continue. The maintenance by MKC had been erratic last year, he said, and he would like a meeting with Rob Ward, MKC Neighbourhood Manager, to find out what the schedule is for this year. It would be a tragedy if what has been done so far is not maintained, he said.  Next Meeting - Monday 6th February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 6th February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting. or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
    Olney Council report for Monday 6th February 2012
    Public Participation
    Paul Watson The first person to speak was Paul Watson, a former Mayor of Olney. Paul had read in last month's Mercury that the Council had Increased its precept, the part of your Council Tax which goes to Olney Town Council (OTC), by 10%. He'd been astonished by this, given that he believed the Council's reserves to be very healthy. During the six years ended 31st March 2009, he stated that Income and expenditure had been under strict financial control, resulting in increases in the cash and bank reserves every year from £195,000 on 31st March 2003 to £386,000 on 31st March 2009, not including the money provided by Milton Keynes Council (MKC) for planning gain and land purchase.  He stated that this financial discipline appeared to have been abandoned and, in each of the years ended 31st March 2010 and 31st March 2011, cash and bank balances had fallen, by in total almost £80,000. Whilst current numbers were only available to the end of December 2011, an extrapolation of those figures to a 12 month period to 31 March 2012 suggested that the same downward spiral was continuing: Even with the 10% Increase in the precept, the Council was staring at an overspend or more than £65,000. Further, he noted that, if the Council had approved the Market Place Toilet renovations, which seemed to be so strongly supported by the Chair of Finance, that would have required a further £38,500, based on OTC's estimates.  Paul felt this was in stark contrast to OTC's staff having been on a pay freeze for three years, bar one Government allowance of £250 paid some time ago. He s1ated that OTC's current spending level was profligate, and that it wasn't too late to reduce spending by instructing the Chair of Finance to rescind the budget approved last month, eliminate the precept increase and prepare a budget which balanced income with expenditure. Members of the Public speaking in this slot are allowed a maximum of three minutes and, in this meeting, the limit was enforced vigorously by Steve Clark. So, Paul didn't get to finish his contribution.  Later In the meeting, Mike Hughes spoke to express his concern about this, and register his disgust at how harshly Steve had called time on the former Councillor's contribution. He felt It was a disgrace. Steve noted his comment.  For information, the minutes of December's Finance Committee meeting show that, of the eight people on the committee, two were absent and, at the vote to set the level of the precept, three voted in favour, one against and two abstained. This proposal was then brought to full Council and finalised.  Carole Russell The second person to speak was Carole Russell, asking the Council to continue part• funding a Specialist Nurse for the Elderly at Cobbs Garden Surgery. The Friends of the Surgery had been campaigning to raise funds but, while they'd raised nearly £2,000, this was nowhere near enough to fund the post. Carole felt that the nurse was a lifeline for the elderly in the area and that, particularly with Olney having a higher than average proportion of elderly people, it would be a travesty if the post could no longer be funded. She concluded by saying that the Friends would not give up raising funds in future and that she was sorry to have to tall back on the Council.  Terry How The third speaker was Terry How, expressing his concerns about the disposal of the land to the rear of 57 - 59 Moores Hill, a topic also covered later in this meeting. Terry felt that c􀁴rtain individuals had pocketed vast sums of money over the sale or the land. He stated that there'd been no representation from Olney's Ward Councillors, who seemed to know what was going to happen in advance of It happening. He was sure that the disposal of the land could have been handled better - it seemed to him to be a case of collusion al MKC, with Olney's Ward Councillors having something to do with ii. He slated that the situation stunk and asked that, If some individuals have made £200,000 to £300,000, how much would go back to Olney residents? He felt that the correct procedures had not been followed by MKC, who are under investigation by the Ombudsman about the issue. Terry fell strongly that a similar situation should not be allowed to happen again, and that OTC had a duty to make sure it didn't. For information, Olney's Ward Councillors are Debbie Brock, absent from this meeting, and Peter Geary, present and seated in the public viewing area. 
    Circus
    Pinder's Circus is due to visit Olney, with the likely time and place being 7th - 9th May on The Pyghtle. The Council will inform local residents.
    Grant Application for Nurse post
    Following on from Carole Russell's contribution, this agenda item was for the Council lo decide whether or not to accept a Grant Application for £11,550 which, added to the money raised by the Friends, would fund the Nurse post for another year. Tony Evans and Mike Hughes thought the post was important, were in favour of funding it but nervous that the commitment was open ended. Deidre Bethune S1ated that the Council had budgeted for the funding. Colin Rodden felt that there were certain things that the Council needed to do, but that it mustn't duplicate things that should be done by the Health Authority.  The Grant Application went to the vote, with all voting in favour bar one abstention - the Council will fund the position tor another year.
    Land to rear of 57 - 59 Moores Hill
    First, some background on this long running issue. Over the years, a number of Planning Applications to build houses on the land to the rear of 57 - 59 Moores Hill have been made and rejected. Now, an Application has been accepted by MKC and, contingent on that acceptance, a developer has purchased two thirds of the garden of one of the Council houses in Moores Hill from MKC, which has also granted an easement for access to the site via a thin strip or its land off Dinglederry. In addition, the developer has purchased part of the garden of a nearby privately owned Moores Hill property, a key area which Joins the access strip with the Council house garden area. The purchase of the two areas of garden, the granting of easement for access and of Planning Permission all come together to create an area of land on which houses may be built.  There were questions as to whether MKC has handled this process correctly, so a complaint was raised In order to discover what happened. MKC complaint investigations can pass through a number of stages - surf to http://bil.ly/z98jJZ for further information. The main findings of Stage two or the investigation were: 
    • There was no evidence of MKC consulting with OTC or OTC's Ward Councillors about the land disposal; 
    • The land was not advertised for sale in an appropriate publication. This was because MKC's Valuer felt that sale to this developer was the only viable option for achieving a development rate for the land, since this developer had already secured the key area of private garden. The Valuer should have set out the justifications for not advertising the land in writing, but appeared not to have done so. 
    • MKC used independent expertise to value the land at a development rate, and secured a price higher than this valuation. 
    • Summary: "In my opinion, the Council ... disposed or the land in accordance with relevant law and largely in compliance with Council Policy, There were some procedural issues which appear to have been missed but in reality these issues are unlikely to have resulted in any different outcome in the disposal." 
    Presumably, the investigation had been escalated further, as the Council had received the following letter from MKC: "The outcome of the stage three investigation Into the Council's processes surrounding the disposal of the above property interests concluded that Property Services had not properly administered the processes ln regard to consultation with Town and Parish Councils and their respective Ward Members. Although this maladministration occurred during the time of my predecessor (2010) I should like to apologise for any inconvenience caused to each of you. The protocols put in place ensure that evidence or timely consultation is included as part of the sign-off procedures, such that there Is now no scope for error or omission in the future. Jeremy Rawlings spoke first, having followed the land disposal issue from the start. He felt that Terry How was right - the support given to affected residents had been abysmal. He summarised the letter as saying that, yes, MKC had made a mistake, but that they weren't planning lo do anything much about it. He felt that OTC must make sure the issue gets raised to a higher level. Jeremy stated that the way the land disposal had been handled was wrong, but didn't know how to proceed further. He concluded by saying that the sale of the land was alter an MKC Planning Meeting in which most of the comments were against It yet, when it came to the vote, most Councillors abstained.  Mike Hughes asked Steve Clark, as Mayor, for his views and perhaps an undertaking to investigate possible ways to proceed. Steve agreed with Jeremy but, again, lei! it unclear what the Council could do. Tony Evans stated that OTC needed legal advice, MKC having operated Improperly and against its own protocol by not advertising the land sale. He also noted rumours that the land had since been sold on by the original purchasers lor a massive profit. He explained that OTC had said the situation was wrong from the start, that It should seek legal advice and, perhaps, that it should sue MKC.  Colin Rodden, a lone voice, questioned the validity of one public body suing another in these money-saving times. He also lelt that Olney had to be allowed to grow - houses had to be built somewhere.  Jeremy Rawlings stated that, while one Olney Ward Councillor is related to one of those who'd purchased the land from MKC, there was emphatically no suggestion that either Ward Councillor had done anything wrong.  Investigations after the meeting confirmed that the residents have raised the complaint to the Ombudsman and discovered that, while the Council was unable to raise it in this way, it's investigating other options, including whether it could support the residents' complaint.  Mercury thanks Jeremy Rawlings and other Councillors who've provided background for this section and helped ensure its accuracy. 
    Grant Application for Youth Centre 
    Jeremy Rawlings gave a brief introduction, saying that the Youth Centre was applying for a grant or £1,250, the salary of a professionally qualified Youth Worker for two sessions per month, for the year starting April 2012. The Council funded the post last year and the sessions have proved very popular with around 50-60 children attending.  Mike Hughes asked if the Youth Centre had tried to obtain funding elsewhere. Jeremy said that ii hadn't, noting that MKC doesn't fund these sessions tor Under 13s. Mike suggested that perhaps the session entry fee should be increased from 60p to £1.60 per person, thus covering the cost. Tony Evans felt that the Grant Application was very good value for money and that, with some people spending time criticising young people In the area, the Youth Club was doing something positive to help. Deidre Bethune concurred, saying that OTC needed to fund the sessions. A vote was taken and passed with all in favour bar two abstentions - the Council will pay the grant.
    Bits 'n' bobs
    MKC is running meetings to explain the process of Community Asset Transfer, in which it plans to transfer some of the assets it owns lo more local ownership. Peter Geary spoke briefly from the public gallery to clarify the purpose of these meetings. As Alan Richardson noted and Peter Geary confirmed, the Olney Centre is not one of these assets - it's not MKC's to transfer.  Some funds arising from the Petsoe End Wind Farm development are becoming available. with £7,000 assigned to the Olney Parish. This money must be allocated towards schemes "for the promotion, installation and education of renewable energy or energy saving measures" in the Parish. OTC will send a representative to the next meeting of the Community Development Liaison Committee, set up to administer these funds. 
    Parking
    The Council had received a letter from a local business asking that the Market Place Car Park time limit be increased from three to five hours. The Council refused this request for reasons including three hours being long enough, there being longer stay spaces in the town and the cost of changing the signage.  In the Cattle Market Car Park, a single parking bay is reserved for turning. However, Mike Hughes noted that it's often heavily encroached on by the vehicle in the next space, thus leaving insufficient angle for vehicles to turn. This results in cars having to back out of the Car Park onto the main road - hardly ideal. MKC has suggested increasing the reserved area to two bays, thus allowing cars to turn more easily. The Council ag.reed with this suggestion.
    Olympics event 
    As reported in earlier Mercury articles, the local Churches are organising an event on 27th July to coincide with the Olympics· Opening Ceremony. Tony Evans noted that this was progressing and that, once the finances had been estimated properly, the organisers must be encouraged to put a proper proposal to OTC. He felt ii would be a fantastic event, if it could be made to work.  Next Meeting 5th March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    Olney Council report for March 2012
    Public Participation
    Terry How The only person to speak at this month's meeting was Terry How, once again speaking about the disposal of the land to the rear of 57-59 Moores Hill. Much of Terry's statement was a reiteration of what he had said at last month's meeting and he noted that while the Ombudsman was now looking into the handling of the matter, none of his questions from last month had been answered. He repeated his assertion that the whole matter ·stinks" and said there appeared to be no transparency from the councillors who should be representing the residents. Mercury assumed that this was directed at the Milton Keynes (MKC) councillors, rather than Olney Town Council (OTC). He said that this was the "thin edge of the wedge for Olney" and, noting that the matter was on the agenda to be discussed when the public and press had been excluded, said that he thought it should be discussed in an open forum. Deidre Bethune asked why It was being discussed in private session and Town Clerk Liam Costello explained that OTC had sought advice from their solicitors which was confidential, at present. Although no discussion normally takes place in the public participation slot, Mayor Steve Clark said that he would allow some discussion to take place, but not regarding the solicitor's advice. It might be possible to communicate this advice to the residents once this had been discussed in the closed session, he said. Jeremy Rawlings said he had spent some lime working with the residents and MKC officers and, while the third and final stage of MKC's complaints procedure had found some shortcomings, it was by and large legal. OTC is not permitted to formally support the residents' complaint to the Ombudsmen, he said. Tony Evans noted rumours that the developer was now looking to buy additional land and build up to six houses. There had been no response to OTC's concerns about drainage, Highways impact in Dinglederry, loss of trees subject to Tree Preservation Orders and overlooking of houses in Moores Hill, he said. Steve Clark said that there were some questions around the procedures adopted for the land sale. When previous planning applications for the land had been submitted the MKC Planning Officers had agreed with OTC's recommendation that It should be rejected. However, this time round an officer had recommended approval and under such circumstance the Planning Committee is obliged to have good reason to ignore the advice of Its own officer in order to overturn this recommendation. Even ii this were to happen an appeal by the developer would usually be successful, he said.  Mercury is grateful to Steve Clark for providing the following Information regarding the Solicitors' advice: The gist of the legal advice was that it would be very unwise for the Town Council to contemplate Instigation of a judicial review into the matter as it would prove lo be extremely expensive and risky and would be hard to justify on the basis that MKC had 'generally followed the correct procedure'. Members were all of the opinion that they could not possibly justify spending a massive sum of public money to pursue this case given the very high risk that it could go against Olney Town Council.
    Hot food at Thursday and Sunday Markets 
    In the past OTC has always rejected requests from market traders to sell hot food on the Sunday and Thursday markets, not only because they didn't want to see things like burgers and hot dogs on sale but also in order to protect the interests of the businesses around the Market Place. Following a recent market where one of the traders had apparently ignored this rule, there had been some feedback at the Recreations and Services Committee meeting about how popular the product on sale had been because it was something different that was not regularly available In the area. Tony Evans reported that the Recreations and Services Committee was now recommending that this rule should be rescinded, subject to certain conditions. Deidre Bethune questioned the actual proposal from the R&S meeting, saying that she thought the recommendation from that meeting was to ·consider· rather than to  'allow'. (For information, the minutes of that meeting show that no vote was actually taken). Tony said that any trader wishing to sell hot food would have to apply in advance and comply with strict conditions. Mike Hughes was in favour of the proposal and said if anyone flouted the new conditions they would be ordered to leave immediately. A vote was taken and passed by a majority with two members voting against.  As an aside, Town Clerk Liam Costello suggested that sub-committees should be more autonomous and not be obliged to take every decision to the full council in order to get it approved. Mercury understands that this is common practice with many other local councils, such as Newport Pagnell, and would certainly overcome the frustration expressed by councillors in the past that, having fully discussed and agreed a course of action at a sub-committee, it is then discussed again at length by the full council. 
    Milton Keynes wind turbine policy 
    The council has been sent a copy of the document Draft Wind Turbines Supplementary Planning Document and Emerging Policy: Wind Turbines Planning Applications for comment, and also a request from the Chair of Castlethorpe Parish Council, Philip Ayles, to support the policy. Philip's letter noted that the existing policy is over 10 years old and was written when turbines were half the height they are today, which is typically 125m (the height of the local turbines at Petsoe End). In fact 200m turbines exist and plans for the first 1000m turbines were recently announced. Much of the policy is around the minimum separation distance between wind farms and housing. The policy is available at www.millon-keynes.gov.uk/wind-turbines and the public are invited to comment, although the consultation period officially ends on 28th March 2012. Unfortunately these documents were sent out in early February and were on the OTC agenda in March but this report will not appear until the end of that month.
    Milton Keynes Transport Strategy Review 
    MKC has written to the council asking for comments on the Transport Strategy Review. The policy is available at  www.millon-keynes.gov.uk/transport/ and the public are Invited to comment, although the consultation period is even lighter, officially ending on 23rd March 2012.
    Parish Partnership Fund 
    This fund is granted by MKC to local councils to enable them to apply for funding of up to 50¾ for improvements or facilities which they wish to provide in their local area, and applications are now being invited. Tony Evans noted that the path into the cemetery needed upgrading, while Deidre Bethune suggested improvements to the roadway to the allotments. Mike Hughes suggested the current hedge laying work that is taking place on Crouch's Field (previously known as 'The New Field'). John Boardman noted that some items of play equipment had been removed from the recreation ground for safety reasons, although Steve Clark said that a similar scheme, the Play Area Improvement Scheme existing specifically for such reasons and MKC was also inviting applications for funding under that scheme. It was agreed to get quotes for the suggestions which will presumably be discussed at a future meeting. 
    Parish Meeting
    This has traditionally taken place in April so that in an election year, such as this, the outgoing council are able to present the annual accounts prior to the start of the new council year, although Uam Costello said that this is not actually a formal requirement. The election for the new council will take place on 3rd May so it was decided to hold the Town Meeting on 26th April. Liam questioned whether the closeness of the two events might impinge on the members ability to 'go knocking on doors' but the opinion of some councillors was that if the electorate could actually be bothered to turn up at the meeting then it would save them the trouble! Mercury is usually almost as lonely at the Town Meeting as he is at the monthly OTC meetings, so ii you want the chance to meet your councillors before the election and question them on anything you like, please come along. 
    Odds and Sods 
    Tony Evans reported that Crouch's Field is looking good and the council workers have done an excellent Job, particularly with the fencing, The hedge laying is coming along well, also. He invited any councillors (and presumably the public as well) to go along and have a look.  Steve Clark reported on the recent meeting of the Emberton Park Liaison Group. There is concern about car movements in the park and the 10 mph speed limit is not well observed. A one way system is being considered, with two way traffic being permitted up to the cafe, he said. The downside of this would mean that access to the Sailing Club would result in a large circuit of the park, though. Consideration is also being given to extending the season for the static caravans, he said.  Rosemary Osbourne reported that MKC had now approved the work required to resolve the Issue of the path which runs between the bottom of Wagstaff Way and the play park that is liable to flooding. Work would commence in May and is due to be completed by August.  Mike Hughes reported 1hat a recent survey conducted by the Neighbourhood Action Group showed that the main issues concerning the residen1s of Olney were: 
    1. Traffic congestion 2. Parking 3. Dog fouling
    all of which came as a surprise to precisely no one, suspected Mercury.  Next Meeting - Monday 2nd April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, ii they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides Is appropriate. The Town Meeting will take place on Thursday 26th April and members of the public are invited to attend and question the council on any matters concerning them. Remember. it's your opportunity to make your voice heard and it's no use complaining that you don't know any of the people behind the names on your ballot paper or you don't agree with what your hard earned money is being spent on ii you don't attend. 
    Olney Council report for April 2012
    Filled to capacity
    The council chamber was filled to capacity by members of the public this month, many eager to speak about the plans to build houses on land to the rear of two houses in Moores Hill or listen to the council debate on the matter. The possibility of two more properties to the rear of a further house has inflamed the situation even further. 
    Public Participation
    Sue Warren The first person to speak was Sue Warren, once again addressing the council on the matter of parking in Oakdown Crescent. Sue said that the situation had worsened as two more nearby residents had recently passed their driving test. She asked Mayor Steve Clarke why he had not responded to a request for action some years ago from MP Mark Lancaster's assistant to himself and Graham Mabbutt when they had been Milton Keynes Council (MKC) ward councillors. (For information, Steve has informed Mercury that neither he nor Graham have any record or recollection of such a request being made). She criticised the council for addressing parking issues elsewhere in the town, quoting the erection of signs to dissuade drivers from parking near Crouch's field, whilst ignoring the plight of the residents of Oakdown Crescent. She criticised the Town Clerk for not following up a letter written in November to Richard Duffill, MKC Traffic and Parking Team Leader, and also Richard himself (who was not present) for not responding to any of her letters or emails, but suspected that the reason for that was her mother giving him a 'hard time' when he had visited to investigate the situation. Finally she criticised MKC Councillor Debbie Brock for not following up a request for information from the Ambulance Service after an incident where an ambulance had not been able to park close to the house of a sick resident. She challenged the councillors to take action and reminded them that it is an election year and there are 20 elderly residents who need their support to have a good end to their life instead of living in a car park.  Chris Kitchener Chris Kitchener spoke on behalf of the residents of Dinglederry about the plans to build additional housing using the rear gardens of some houses in Moores Hill with access via Dinglederry. Chris said that a number of applications had been made over the years for two houses, five houses and lastly three bungalows, all of which had been rejected. The latter had been the subject of an appeal to the Planning Inspectorate in Bristol. The residents had been supported by both OTC and MKC in those objections and in July 2002 MKC had placed a preservation order on trees in the gardens. In July 2004 she and her neighbours in Dinglederry had been approached by a firm of property developers with a request to purchase eight metres of their gardens to enable access to the gardens in Moores Hill but had turned down a considerable offer because they loved their existing rural outlook. She concluded by saying that the Government have stated that they want local people to have more say in the development of their localities and asked that they be listened to. Nick Shipton Next to speak on the subject was Nick Shipton. Please note that the following transcription is based on a statement read by Nick and The Phonebox cannot vouch for the accuracy of its content. Nick stated that as a result of the Stage 3 complaint which the residents had raised with MKC, they now had a letter and apology which stated that the sale of the council land and the easement of the 'ransom strip' was not carried out according to policy and process and was unlawful. He said that MKC had admitted that the land was sold illegally to the developer and was now considering compounding the situation by allowing further houses to be built. The original developer had since sold on the gardens on to a builder at a huge profit, he said, but local government law does not allow ex-council land to be sold on undeveloped. He also had a letter from Peter Smettem, Valuer to MKC, which stated that the easement over the council owned strip would be limited to three dwellings and another letter from Richard Jenden, Estates Manager, confirming this to be the case. This commitment should be upheld as promised, he said. The granting of the previous application will have a devastating consequence to many families living in Dinglederry and any further building in the area would ruin other families' home lives, including his own. The developer was not providing valuable services to Olney through the building of social housing, but was merely looking to make money. Due to the family relationship of the original developer to both of Olney's MKC ward councillors (Debbie Brock and husband Peter Geary) the residents will, again, not have the benefit of a ward councillor to support them, he said. With the previous application they were only able to secure the services of a 'proxy' councillor (i.e. a councillor with no interest from another ward) a week before the meeting at which the planning permission was granted.  Terry How The last person to speak was Terry How, who had spoken at the two previous meetings. He was highly critical of the two ward councillors, making a number of accusations, and called for them both to resign. In view of the forthcoming MKC elections and libel laws of this country, The Phonebox has decided not to report these accusations. 
    Easement to rear of 59 Moores Hill 
    This was the formal agenda item for the council to discuss this matter. The interested members of the public were still present for this item and some attempted to join the debate, but Mayor Steve Clark was strict in imposing the Standing Order which forbids this. Jeremy Rawlings informed the council that an application had been received for a further easement of the MKC owned access strip, as discussed in the public participation section of the meeting. This was not unexpected he said, as previous applications had included development to the rear of 61 Moores Hill. He said the whole thing was steeped in mystique and bad dealings and felt that MKC should be bought to account. He was frustrated that no one at MKC was being brought to account for the original mistakes in the consultation process. Deidre Bethune said that there was no point in objecting as MKC would just ignore the recommendation of OTC. Mike Hughes thought that the Mayor and Town Clerk should make an official and personal representation stating OTC's objection rather than proffering it in a 'limp' way. He felt it was time that OTC was listened to prior to the easement being debated. Background details should be provided pointing out that MKC has admitted previous wrong doing, he said. Town Clerk, Liam Costello, reminded members that MKC had admitted its previous mistakes but has been advised by its solicitors that it had not acted illegally so the only subject currently up for debate was the extension to the easement. Jeremy said that if OTC had a spare £1 00k it could take on MKC and probably win, but unfortunately it didn't. Steve Clark compared the situation with the strategy of a certain major supermarket chain when dealing with objections to planning permissions. Ron Bull suggested harnessing the power of the local media to point out that MKC had broken its own rules and the general consensus was that this was a good idea and should be investigated. 
    Church Community Festival for Olympics
    As reported previously, the combined Baptist and Parish Churches plan to hold an event on the Recreation Ground to celebrate the opening of the Olympic Games on the evening of Friday July 27th. It would be a celebratory, family friendly, community event by the people of Olney for the people of Olney that reflects the aims of the Olympic Vision in terms of its sporting and cultural agenda, running from 4:30pm to 11 :30 pm. The intention is that the event should be self­financing through proceeds from takings, together with sponsorship and donations from organisations. To that end the organisers have requested a grant of £2056 from OTC and an underwriting sum of £660 to cover the hire of toilets. In view of recent criticism of council spending the council decided not to agree to the grant outright but agreed on a majority vote to underwrite the event to the value of £2,716 to cover the costs of the marquee and toilets. The money will be paid by instalments to cover any costs when they incur, and is to be repaid if the event generates a surplus. 
    Community Parking Fund
    This fund is managed by MKC with the aim of providing additional parking availability in established residential areas and is delivered in partnership with Parish and Town Councils. The maximum award is normally £30k per Parish/T'own Council per year and a maximum of three applications may be made by each Parish, although the Parish is expected to contribute 50% of the costs. Tony Evans reported on two plans, the first to increase the number of spaces in the East Street (Rugby Club) car park and the second to provide a new car park at the East Street end of the Nursery Field (football pitch). At the moment there is a central dividing kerb, with two rows of perpendicular parking either side of it. There is a considerable amount of space between the rows of bays which often results in cars parking in the middle blocking access to and from the marked bays. It is proposed to remove the central kerb, moving the rows towards the pitch with the bays at 45 degrees, which should allow one, or possibly two, rows of additional parking. The second plan involves the creation of a new parking area behind the football pitch at the East Street boundary, to provide an additional 36 spaces. Mercury understands that a six foot high fence will be erected for protection. A vote was taken with a majority voting in favour of making two applications for funding under the scheme. The council is keen to hear views of residents and details of the proposals, including plans, can be viewed at the offices in the Olney Centre during normal offices hours of 9:00am to 4:00pm Monday to Thursday, and 9:00am to 3:00pm on Friday.
    Market waste skip 
    Councillors had noted that little waste is placed in the weekly skip and that the automatic sweeper is no longer used. This is an annual cost to the OTC of £16750. The last meeting of the Rees and Services Committee had recommended that the provision of a skip be discontinued and the market traders asked to clear their pitch at the end of the day and take their rubbish away. Tony Evans reported on a subsequent meeting with the market traders to discuss the issue where Neil Bowditch had managed to obtain a quote for a basic open top skip for £8060 per year. The council voted by a majority to have a six month trial and Debbie Brock thanked Neil for his initiative.
    Emptying of dog waste bins 
    There are currently 39 dog bins in Olney which are emptied on Monday each week, with a second collection on Thursday between the months of April and September (Mercury assumes this is in order to avoid unpleasant odours, rather than the impact of hot weather on the canine metabolism). The current contactor has quoted £2.69 plus VAT per bin for the first empty and £1.34 plus VAT for the second empty for an eight year contract running up to March 2020. The council consider this good value for money and agreed to renew the contract. 
    Disclosure of Interest 
    Town Clerk, Liam Costello, provided a summary of a document issued by the National Association of Local Councils (NALC) regarding members' conduct and the registration of and disclosure of their interests, as defined in the Localism Act 2011. The Act provides that every relevant authority in England is under a duty to promote and maintain high standards of conduct by its members and co-opted members and in doing so must adopt a code of conduct. The definition of co-opted member covers non­councillor members of sub-committees and joint committees who are entitled to vote at meetings. This would include such groups as the Dickens of a Christmas Committee, said Liam. The lack of a declaration of interest is now considered a criminal offence, he said. Mercury noted that the offence carries a potential fine of £5000 and/or disqualification for up to five years.
    Odds and Sods
    Representatives of OTC will in future be entitled to issue parking tickets themselves for parking violations on the Market Place on days when parking is prohibited, such as market days. The tickets will be enforced by its contractor, Napier Parking.  Deidre Bethune said she thought the thick yellow bus stop markers painted by MKC are an eyesore and noted that complaints had been received from members of the public.  Alan Richardson noted that parking around The Knoll was becoming a problem and suggested that double yellow lines should be provided.  Mike Hughes reported that he would be standing down at the forthcoming elections and thanked the council for an enjoyable time, including his two years as Mayor. Steve Clark thanked him for his valuable contribution.  The recent continental market was not judged to be a success. The food was of very poor quality and the whole event was described as scruffy and down at heel. Jeremy Rawlings noted that the German Sausage vendor was a burger van and Tony Evans said that the traders left all of their rubbish at the end.  Next Meeting - Monday 14th May The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 14th May in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. The Town Meeting will take place on Thursday 26th April and members of the public are invited to attend and question the council on any matters concerning them
    Olney Council report for May 2012
    Public Participation
    Kevin Osborne The first person to speak was Kevin Osborne, representing lhe Olney and Clifton Reynes Fishing Association. Over 30 years ago, the Association built a set of walkways and small bridges alongside the river between the Mill and Doff's Field in order to improve access for its members. Over time, the riverside walk has become taken for granted by the Public and, while the Association has no problem with non­members using the structures, this usage increases wear and tear. As such the Association is asking if they could contribute towards what has become a town facility, either by supplying materials or reducing the Association's rent.  Mike Hughes Mike Hughes, who's just stepped down as the Councillor, spoke very briefly to wish the Council and residents of Olney good fortune and a successful year.  Samantha Tomlin Samantha Tomlin, of the Olney Chamber of Trade (CoT), had asked the Council for permission for the CoT to use the Market Square on Friday 14th and Saturday 15th September for the Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF). This topic and that of the next speaker were to be discussed later In the meeting.  Paul Collins Finally, Paul Collins, a Trustee of the Cowper and Newton Museum, noted that ii was hosting a number of events starting on Sunday 16th September. On that day, the High Sheriff of Buckinghamshire will be starting a Charity horse ride from the North to the South of the County and. with Olney being pretty much at the Northernmost lip, the ride is starting from the Museum. 
    Elections 
    This was the first meeting of this year's Council, so ii started with various elections. Steve Clark was re-elected as Mayor with Jeremy Rawlings continuing as his deputy, both posts being uncontested. The committee Chairs stayed as last year although Deidre Bethune, absent this evening, had noted that, If anyone else wished to lake over as Finance Committee Chair, she'd be more than happy for them to do so. The Committee will elect its own Chair at its first meeting. 
    Storage unit licences 
    The storage units on the Recreation Ground are rented to The Olney Group (TOG), Olney Rugby Club and Olney Colts Football Club. The licences are due for renewal and, following advice from a Solicitor, they've been tightened up somewhat and, to reduce administration, now have a five year upper limit on their duration. 
    Big Olney Food Festival 
    As you may have noticed, the High Sheriff's horse ride will be starting one day after the BOFF. As such, the CoT and the Museum plan to coordinate and, after a brief discussion involving Councillors and, with Standing Orders temporarily suspended to allow it, Samantha and Paul, it seemed like this would work out well. The CoT offered either to have the BOFF Marquees taken down on the Saturday night, leaving the Square free for the ne-xt day, or to leave them up for the Sunday, allowing the Museum to use them with, if desired, some food stalts. This item concluded with the CoT being given permission to use the Market Square for 48 hours from midday Friday 14th September.
    Chantry Rise play area 
    As reported before, the lower footpath in the Chantry Rise play area is liable to flooding. To alleviate this problem, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) has proposed building a boardwalk over much of this path, similar to those in Emberton Par1<. Councillors liked this and, after a short discussion, it was approved. Debbie Brock concluded by thanking the Neighbourhood Action Group for its help pushing this through. 
    Olney Middle School Car Boot Sale 
    The Friends of Olney Middle School have asked the Council for permission to use the East Street Car Park to host a Car Boot Sale in the summer to raise funds for the School. Tony Evans started by noting that, while he didn't want to be a killjoy, the Council had always refused requests to use this Car Park for non-parking purposes. Steve Clark asked where people attending the Sale would park. Other possible nearby venues included the area between East Street and the nearby goalposts on the Recreation Ground - that which may in any case soon become a Car Park. After further discussion, a consensus was reached. The Council agreed in principle to support the event, and to hold discussions with the School about precisely where to hold it. 
    Dickens of a Christmas
    Introduced by Alan Richardson, this item was to request a budget increase for Dickens of a Christmas (DoC). In essence, Alan wanted to increase the entertainments budget from  £3,000 to £4,000 in order to provide more to see along the High Street - the aim being for the event lo be continuous between the Amaya restaurant and the Market Square. Councillors voted to accept this request - this was a major event which deserved the backing.  Peter Geary, while in favour of the increase, noted that it must be round without increasing the overall budget for the current financial year, currently projected to overspend by  £65,000. In other words, other things would have to be trimmed to compensate. Liam Costello noted that recent budgets had underspent compared with initial projections. Peter replied that the budget should be redrafted in order to make It realistic. 
    Sound and lights 
    Alan Richardson noted that the Olney Centre sound system, around 20 years old, had failed and, with that affecting bookings, the amplifier had been replaced by local company Impact.  The Council had budgeted £2,250 this year towards the ongoing replacement of the lamppost-mounted Christmas light curtains with more efficient LED versions. Councillors approved this expenditure and, with some local shops offering to make contributions to the local community, will see if that could make it possible to replace them more quickly.  The Jubilee Beacon lighting is being organised by a group of Councillors and one of the TOG members. It will be Iii at 10.1 Spm on 4th June. For more information on the Beacons Which will be lit around the UK, surf to http://bit.ly/Kg6YVX. 
    Development publicity
    Following on from Terry Howe's question at the Town Meeting, Ron Bull asked Liam Costello for the latest information on the Moores Hill development issues. Much as before, Liam replied that the Council was still waiting on MKC for an update and that, while publications had been made aware of the issues, he couldn't force them to publish them. 
    Long grass
    Tony Evans noted that the last lime MKC had cut the grass around Olney was 6th April, with the next cut being due for 18th May, six weeks later. He felt this was totally unacceptable. He concluded by comparing the schedule with those of previous years: Last year there were eight cuts, one every four weeks, while In the year before there were 13.  Next Meeting - Monday 11th June The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 11th June in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
    Olney Council report for June 2012
    Public Participation
    Sue Warren First to speak was Susan Warren. chasing for progress with the ongoing parking problems in Oakdown Crescent, asking about the outcome of the site meeting held on the 8th May and for any news on a letter concerning the issue sent to Milton Keynes Council (MKC) last November. She also brought some old letters, including one from Newport Pagnell RuralDistrict Council to Weston Road _ residents dated November 1968 which stated that the "tuming space, in Oakdown Crescent, is not to be used for long term parking and your cooperation to ensure this is so, is requested'. Susan concluded by saying that the Oakdown Crescent residents deserve better and that she would not give up.  Debbie Brock Debbie Brock responded that the site meeting had been on behalf of MKC officers working on several proposals to improve parking in the area but that the process would take time. Susan claimed that Debbie was not informing people of progress. Debbie concluded thisitem by explaining that there was nothing - to say but. when there was, she'd say it.  Barry Edwards Last to speak was Barry Edwards of Dodo Antiques, giving background on road closures he'd requested for consideration in this meeting. In summary, the closures are for the length of road between 2 and 8 Silver End for the daytime of various weekends over the summer for the purpose of charily fundraising antiques fairs. 
    Bits n Bobs
    Tony Evans and Ben Brock were not present, having sent their apologies.  Tony had sent a letter explaining that, following recent rainfall, the pitch between the Football Club and East Street was too soft for heavy vehicles and, thus, unsuitable for the fair due lo arrive on Monday 18th June. So, regrettably, his letter recommended that the Council cancel the fair In order to avoid the risk of serious damage lo the ground. Councillors agreed.  Debbie Brock noted that the April grass cutting date given In last month's meeting, and  reported by Mercury, was incorrect. e correct dale ls in fact 16th - 17th Apnl, ,:ti ten days later than given, meaning that the lime between cuts was shorter than claimed.  Councillors briefly discussed then agreed Barry's request for Silver End road closures over the summer. 
    Moores Hill development - part one 
    This item was to discuss correspondence from MKC regarding the easement to the land to the rear of Moores Hill from Dinglederry and, having earlier declared personal and prejudicial interests, Debbie Brock and Peter Geary left the meeting.  Jeremy Rawlings started the discussion, feeling that the decision, at Peter Geary's request, to split the single agenda item covering the development Into two parts was not ideal because the parts were not separable. He noted that John Bint, the Ward Councillor who'd represented residents' views at the Development Control meeting, had done a good job. After further discussion In which every Councillor who contributed appeared unhappy with the whole issue, bar Steve Clark who took more of a chairman's role, Councillors decided to note their displeasure and to make furtherrepresentations If and when a Planning.  Application for the land is received.
    Moores HIii development - part two 
    Having earlier declared only a personal interest in this item, which was to discuss the Ombudsman's Reports, Debbie and Peter retumed to the meeting.  As background, there were two Reports. The first responded to a nearby resident's complaint that MKC had failed to properly process a transaction involving the sale of Council owned land and that, as a result, he missed out on the opportunity to bid for the land. The second responded to another nearby resident's complaint that in addition to a similar MKC failing, MKC was at fault for the grant of an easement over the access to that land. He'd also claimed that a survey of Great Crested NeW1s should have been arranged and that incorrect information about Tree Preservation Orders had been presented to the Development Control Committee.  The Ombudsman's decision on the first Report was that there was no requirement !or MKC to advertise the land for sale but that rt should have consulted with Olney Town Council alternative (OTC) uses and for its the Ward Councillors about alternative uses for the land, a failing which MKC had acknowledge,cL The Ombudsman felt that the complainant had not suffered significant injustice because, even if his views on alternative uses for the land had been heard, the price obtained by the Council for the land reflected its development value and took into account the easement and, thus, would have exceeded and provided better value than any otter made by the complainant. The decision concluded with the Ombudsman saying that he needn't be further involved with the complaint.  The decision on the second Report was broadly similar, though also noting that MKC had behaved correctly regarding the ecological points. This decision concluded with the Ombudsman discontinuing his office's involvement in the complaint.  Back to the meeting, Jeremy Rawlings felt that, once again, the Reports had indicated errors in MKC's handling of the land sale but that the Ombudsman had ignored them. Peter Geary felt differently and, starting with "I wasn't going to say anything but...", gave his views. He felt that OTC had received a one sided recollection of what had taken place. The facts were that the Ombudsman had  identified some failings, for which MKC hadapologised, but concluded that these _failings  had not changed the overall outcome. Pet r felt there'd been one main failing - that 􀂡neither OTC nor them as Ward Councillors had been notified - but that much debate had taken place in OTC and in the town. However, the Obmudsman's Reports were from an independent, unbiased body with no axe to grind. He concluded by noting a concern that, with OTC having taken legal advice in this case due lo requests from concerned residents, a precedent could have been set for how it handles similar requests in future.  Andrew Dooley pointed out that this planning issue was different from others, as neither Ward Councillor had been allowed to represent the town. People thought they'd been abandoned by OTC and it could not change their views. Peter replied that he'd spent many hours on the phone to Nick Shipton, who'd spoken as a member of the public in April's OTC meeting, but that when it became clear they could no longer take part in the issue, he and Debbie had backed out. Going further, Peter slated that people had not been abandoned: This was a myth and not part of the complaints. In fact, someone had taken on representing residents' views a few days later. He noted that one complainant was an aggrieved developer who'd also wanted to bid for the land.  Debbie gave some background, some of which was in answering a post-meeting question from Mercury. She explained that Peter had been due lo speak In a Planning Meeting as a member of the public against the Planning Application. He'd declared a prejudicial interest and so was allowed to do this but would have had to leave before the debate had taken place. However, a day or two before the meeting, MKC received accusations about Debbie's conduct along with a strong view that neither she or Peter should have anything to do with the Application. As a result, they backed away from it apart from, when asked, helping lo arrange an alternative Ward Councillor to represent residents' views. She said that they'd never abandon people in the town, "we just wouldn't", and that the whole episode had been regrettable. She fell that OTC had been manipulated to an extent: One of its members, not present at this mooting, should not have been part of some conversations in this Chamber - not good news. Jeremy Rawlings concluded the discussion, saying that MKC had made an arbitrary decision not to advertise the land on the open market due to it not being possible to use standalone. He felt this had been glossed over. 
    Code of conduct and declaration of Interests 
    As regular readers will know, Councillors are obliged to declare ii they have an interest in any items being discussed. Peter Geary explained that not doing so will shortly become a criminal offence. This meant that Councillors must understand what constituted personal and prejudicial interests or else, in theory at least, they could end up appearing before a Court.
    Local boundary review
    Differences in the rate of population expansion across M1lton Keynes Borough mean that some Ward Councillors now represent many more people than others and, thus, MKC ls performing a Ward boundary review. First of all the Electoral Commission is asklng how m􀃘ny Councillors should sit on MKC. Once it knows this, the ratio of Ward Councillors lo people is known and the resulting Ward boundary positions will then be decided.  This raises the possibility of Olney, plus some surrounding villages, being split into two Wards and, thus, each Olney Town Councillor being elected to represent one or the other. Historically, OTC has not believed this to be a good situation, and discussion tonight confirmed this view. As a result, OTC's opinion was that the number of MKC Councillors should be increased to around 67 - 70, thus keeping the ratio of Ward Councillors to people about the same and, it hoped, avoiding Olney being split into two Wards.  Mercury thanks Debbie Brock and Peter Geary for providing background on this issue. 
    East Street car parking 
    OTC noted in this year's Town Meeting that it's looking to provide additional parking near the sports fields by changing some of the grass area between the westernmost Recreation Ground goalposts and East Street for use as a car park. Details of this proposal have been on display at Olney Town Council but, in summary, a reconfiguration of the existing nearby car park would provide an additional 25 spaces while the additional area would provide a further 36. The MKC Community Parking Fund may help fund this work.  liam Costello Introduced the Item noting that there'd been some opposition from local residents and suggesting that, since both parts of the scheme were feasible, OTC could apply for funding for the two, then make firm decisions later on which, if any, to implement. Noting that, in spite of the Council having sent consultation letters to nearby residents, some had first heard of the proposals from the Phone Box, Debbie felt that they were very much hypothetical - they may never happen. She also stated that the devices added to the existing East Street car park to reduce antisocial behaviour mustn't be removed by any changes. Councillors decided to submit formal applications to the Community Parking Fund, listing the reconfiguration of the existing car park as the priority.
    Football Club fence 
    Olney Football Club has informed the Council of plans to erect a perimeter fence around its main pitch on the Recreation Ground. Paul Tough, Chair of the Club, was present and, at various points, standing orders were lilted so he could answer questions.  Summarising, Paul explained that the fencing would be low, likely green in colour, and was required to meet new Football Association rules and thus allow the Club to continue to operate. It was not the intention to stop the public, or indeed the fair, from using the area. As such, the plans included two areas where the fencing would slide back to allow access, and that these would be closed just between Friday and Saturday evenings. An additional benefit would be the reduction of dog fouling on match days. Finally, given the earlier discussion on parking, he noted that, if the area between the westernmost goal and East Street did become a car park, it could be possible to have a temporary high net behind the goal, to be erected only on match days, thus avoiding a permanent, and likely less pleasing, high fence there.  Councillors voted in favour of the plans, with six voting for, two against and three abstalning.
    Bobs 'n' bits 
    liam said that the Jubilee Beacon lighting had been very successful, and thanked The Olney Group (TOG) and Neill Elliot for helping organise it. He also reported that a new head groundsman has started at the Council. Finally, all Ann Hopkins Smith Alms Houses are currently lull but the waiting list is empty, so any elderly Lady with strong Olney connections can apply for an Almshouse by writing to Tony Evans at Olney Park Farm, Yardley Road, Olney, Bucks.  Next Meeting - Monday 2nd July The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 2nd July in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    Olney Council report for July 2012
    More Public than Members
    There were more members of the public than councillors present at the start of this month's meeting, so Mercury was looking forward to an evening of lively debate. 
    Public Participation
    Jim Middleton Five members of the public spoke at this month's meeting. First to speak was Jim Middleton on the subject or the Olney bypass. Jim read from a statement he had submitted to the Milton Keynes Core Strategy examination hearing. Jim said as a resident of Olney he attended the MK South Midlands Panel but was not allowed to say anything at the examination. The point he had made in the written submission was that all the development of urban areas north, south, east and west of Olney was having a hugely detrimental effect on Olney with traffic getting ever worse. Jim said he was ignored, and the panel in fact allowed no transport schemes, other than those in the then government's short term plans. This was a pathetic response from so called professionals to a long term planning exercise, he said, and in his opinion there can be no stronger case for a bypass anywhere in the country than Olney. Jim's full submission can be downloaded from http://www.milton­ keynes.gov.uk/planning-policy/documents/REP-269971- 3_MiddletonMKlnqdoc1 OlneyBP.pdf  Karen Gilbert Next to speak was Karen Gilbert, owner of Beans Cate in the Market Place, on a subject that was obviously of concern to a number of members of the public present, namely the application by Real Estate Advisors Savills, on behalf of Calle Nero, to open a branch in the building previously occupied by Derby House Saddtery. Karen said hers is a small, independent business which would struggle to compete against a large, national chain. The rates in Olney were the highest of the lour locations where she had branches and while Caffe Nero could absorb high business rates, she could not.  Elaine Baxendale Elaine Baxendale also spoke against the application. She has been an Olney resident for nine years, she said, and one of the attractions of the town is Its small 'quirky' establishments. Local businesses would be certain to suffer, she feat. and questioned whether Olney needed another big concern. There was a need to consider the environment, she said. The planning application was discussed as an agenda item later in the meeting.  Brian Rice Next to speak was Bryan Rice on the continued problems of parking In Oakdown Crescent.  Richard Stone Richard Stone, Bar Manager of The Carlton House Club (formerly Olney Working Men's Club) spoke about the proposal to position a bench outside of the club. For Information, this has been the subject of discussions by the council for many years. Many elderly people have complained that there is no where to sit and rest whist making the long walk along the High Street and the council have been looking to find a suitable location for a bench. Richard said that one of the license conditions of the club was that members should leave the club in a quiet and orderly manner. Although the club has a smoking area within the grounds he was concerned that a bench at the front would encourage members who wished to smoke to sit on the bench and also take drinks with them, which would be against the terms of the license. As a previous licensee of The Bull he knew what problems a bench outside would attract, he said. Added to that he and his family lived above the club with bedrooms facing out on to the High Street and they would be bound to suffer disturbed nights, he said.  George Horncasltle George Horncastle, Secretary of the club spoke next and said whist he accepted that the bench was for the benefit of elderly members of the community it would be bound to attract other people and the club would be blamed for disorderly behaviour of customers leaving adjacent licensed premises.
    Best Kept VIiiage 2012 
    Although Olney is a town it is eligible for entry to this competition and this year won the Michaelis Cup for small towns. The competition awards are for Best Kept towns/villages, not beautiful villages, and care, cleanliness, maintenance and community effort were what the judges were looking for when they visited in June. There will be a brief presentation ceremony at the Olney Centre on 8th September. Mercury noted, somewhat ironically, that Savills Is one of the sponsors of the competillonl
    Planning application for Derby House 
    For information, this building has been empty since the Derby House Saddlery vacated the premises a year ago. It is a building of significant local importance and history, having been the site ol J.W. and E. Sowman which was established as an ironmongers in 1888 and went on to become a large emporium, finally being sold to Burgess' In 1962. Burgess' left the town in 1984. Real Estate Advisors Savllls have lodged two planning applications with respect to the premises. The first is to convert the upper floor into four two bedroom residential apartments. The second is for a change of use from a shop (use Class A 1) to a cafe  (mixed A1/A3) for occvpation by a branch of Calle Nero. In the Planning Statement Savills referred back to similar change of use applications which had been granted in Olney over the last 12 years. They also listed a number of natJonal appeal decisions which had established the justification for change to mixed A 1 /A3, which some councillors found somewhat intimidating. MKC ward councillor Peter Geary reminded the members that objections could only be made on planning grounds rather than the impact it would have on local businesses. However, the council might decide that there are already enough similar businesses nearby and any more would change the character of the town, in which case an objection might be justified. Multi-national companies like Savills and Caffe Nero have huge financial resources to appeal against any rejections he said, pointing out Tesco had successfully taken over two shops in the town. Mayor Steve Clark felt that Caffe Nero could not be regarded as a quality outlet and would not increase footfall in the town. He said it was regrettable that Derby House had closed the branch, since he knew of customers who travelled over 100 miles to shop there. Jeremy Rawlings thought it most unlikely that anyone would travel 100 mile to visit Caffe Nero, although he pointed out that if the application was rejected the building could be empty for many years. Peter Geary suggested that the council should support the application for the flats since it would reduce the size of the shop and make it more marketable. He also reminded councillors that if Gaffe Nero were so minded they could buy up one of the existing coffee shops in the town and would not need to apply for a change of use. Colin Rodden was concerned that the plans did not allow for sufficient car parking for the cafe and flats. Debbie Brock said that it was important that the Integrity of the front and rear of the building Is maintained so the proposed UPVC windows were not appropriate. Alan Richardson noted that the plans Included retlling of the entrance but pointed out the existing tiling is of historical importance. 
    Electoral Review of MIiton Keynes
    Mercury is grateful to MKC ward councillor Peter Geary for providing the background to this issue. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England has undertaken discussions with MKC and consulted publicly on council size and has decided that the number of councillor should be increased to 57, from the current 51. Each councillor will cover 3,300 residents as opposed to 3,000 at present. What now has to be decided is the way the wards in Milton Keynes are constructed. The starting point is 19 wards, each represented by three councillors. In most of urban MK this is fine but in the rural areas this leaves very large geographical areas with many individual communities requiring individual attention from their councillors in attending parish council meetings etc. For example a merged Sherington and Olney ward would comprise around 18 parishes. With this in mind the two councillors. The boundary commission says that if a parish is split then it must be warded. Two years ago OTC campaigned against proposals by MKC to impose warding but these proposals mean that parish would be warded by stealth. Both the Sherington Ward and the Olney Ward currently have the correct representation for the new ratio of 3,300 electors per councillor so little change would be necessary and maintaining the status quo may well mean that better representation could be given to the areas. If, however, the areas are to be merged it would be better to have one three-councillor ward as opposed to single councillor wards which would see Olney Town Council warded. Peter said that in his opinion the two-councillor ward has worked successfully for many years, with the two councillors dividing up responsibility between them. Jeremy Rawlings questioned if this would work across the political spectrum, but Debbie Brock said that she and Steve Clark had managed ok. Steve Clark said that Olney Councillors have always expressed a desire to represent all of the people of the town.
    102 Weston Road
    The Town Council have received notification from the Housing Revenue Account Strategic Landlord Asset Management Group within MKC that the ground floor flat forming part of the property is to be removed from their housing stock and disposed of. It appears that when the previous occupant left it was no longer fit for habitation and has been empty for the last two years. MKC cannot justify the 'extensive financial investment to bring it up to a suitable standard for future beneficial occupation·. Peter Geary explained that the property has many issues and would cost an enormous amount to repair so the money would be better spent on building another, more easily maintainable property somewhere in Milton Keynes. One of the by• products of the disposal might be a partial solution to the parking problems in Oakdown Crescent since the property has a large front garden, some of which could be retained and used for parking. This would need consultation with the residents, he said.
    Odds and Sods
    A kebab van has applied to MKC for permission to operate from the old cattle market car park, owned by MKC. The councillors agreed not to support the application on the grounds of there being another establishment nearby catering for the need. Steve Clark said the applicant seemed to be under the impression that MKC had already granted permission and suggested that OTC apply to take over ownership of the car park as a Community Asset Transfer so that they could fully control it.  Steve Clark reported that he had attended the Olney 2012 event to mark the start or the London Olympics and it had been a great success.  Rosemary Osbourne reported that the boardwalk over the flood plane in Wagstaff Way should have started but had been delayed by the bad weather! It was now expected to be completed by 20th August.  Next Meeting - Monday 3rd September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd September in the Council Chamber In the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. Official minutes of all meetings and much more information can be accessed via OTC's revamped website at  www.olneytowncouncil.gov.uk 
    Olney Council report for August.... 2011
    Public participation 
    No members of the public present (Mercury plus one!) wished to speak at this month's meeting. 
    Co-option of members
    A vacancy had arisen following the recent resignation of Nigel Birrell and there being no request for an election from the requisite number of the electorate, it fell to the council members present to fill the vacancy by co-option. The two candidates were invited to give a short address to the council to summarise their CVs.  First to speak was David Rumens, who was standing again following his failure to be co­opted to fill one of two vacancies at last month's meeting. David was first elected to OTC in 2008 and served for two years before having to resign due to ill health. Now that his health issues had been resolved David said he would welcome the opportunity of serving the town again as a member of the council. His experience in local government dates back to 1979 when he was elected to South Beds District Council and he has held many positions since. During his last stint on OTC he represented the council at many meetings with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) as he has a keen interest in resolving the enduring problem of high traffic volumes through Olney. He was also instrumental in the battle to keep Olney as a single ward, against the wishes of MKC who wanted to split it into three. He is currently a member of the Neighbourhood Action Group and is proud of his reputation as a 'campaigning councillor', he said.  The second candidate to speak was Tony Summerscales, a civil engineer in the water industry. Although he admitted he had no experience in local govennment he said that he had a young son and wanted him to grow up in a safe community and he was putting himself forward so that he could get involved in maintaining the town and its community for the enjoyment of the next generation.  A secret ballot then took place with Tony Summerscales receiving the most votes and he was duly elected. Steve Clark thanked David Rumens for his interest. David left the meeting at this point. 
    Flood Risk Management 
    Bruce Stewart, Senior Planning Officer - Strategic Flood Risk Management for Milton  Keynes Council was present to explain his role, which he has been in since March 2011, and the implications of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 which is gradually being implemented nationally. The current framework was largely established in the 1930s and 40s, he said and, although some updating had taken place, it did not comply with EU legislation and guidance. The new act meant that MKC as the Local Authority were obliged to take over certain flood responsibilities from the Environment Agency (EA) and Dept. for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). MKC has set up a parent Cabinet-led management group and three officer lead working subgroups comprising Strategic Flood Planning, Flood Prevention and Flooding Emergency Response. The principle shortcomings identified thus far are a lack of in-house water, drainage and flood expertise and a shortage of available funding to address problems in those areas. It isMKC's intention to form closer relationships with Parish and Town Councils who may be able to assist in providing information on local water and flood risk management issues, said Bruce. Mayor Steve Clark said that councils were frustrated that developers were allowed to put in planning applications for floodplains and Bruce replied that any applications with flood implications would now be submitted to him.
    Localism Bill 
    The Localism was introduced to Parliament in December 2010 and seeks to shift much of the decision making of central government to local authorities. Part of the bill deals with the right of communities to submit an 'expression of interest' to the local authority to provide or assist in providing a relevant service on behalf of that authority and that could lead to a transfer of assets from the authority. Steve Clark said that OTC already manages many of its own assets but the bill would widen the scope when it became law. MKC might come under pressure to dispose of some of its local assets such as car parks, the Olney Centre and Emberton Park, he said. In the event of the latter it was unlikely that Emberton Parish Council would be able to afford to manage the park but OTC could consider a joint venture, he suggested. MKC will be running a series of workshops during August and OTC will send representatives with a view to forming a sub-committee. This will doubtless be the subject of discussion at future meeting since in Steve's view it is a massive subject at which OTC should "nibble gently". 
    Recreation ground sewage pipe (continued)
    As reported last month the sewage pipe connecting the four sports club houses to the main in East Street has collapsed, which is why there is regularly an overflow when functions take place at the clubs, necessitating rodding by the council staff. Alan Richardson said that since the last council meeting he had had two meetings with Anglian Water and they had confirmed that from October 1 st 2011 the section of pipe which had collapsed would become the responsibility of Anglian Water under the new proposal to adopt private sewers and lateral drains. Although any work that Anglian Water deemed necessary would be done free of charge the replacement would not happen immediately, he said. The first time a blockage was reported Anglian Water would attend and rod the drain to unblock it. If it then became a regular occurrence then the gang would report it with a recommendation to consider replacement work. Eventually it would get replaced, he said. Deidre Bethune asked if the council would now reconsider the refurbishment of the Market Place toilets now that this particular problem would be resolved at nil cost to the council. 
    Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) 
    Deidre Bethune reported that this hugely popular event would take place for the third year running on Saturday September 12th. Last year's event had made a slight loss, she said, and since then the membership of the Chamber of Trade had reduced. In view of these facts she asked if the council would consider underwriting the event in case of financial loss, as they do for the Firework Night run by TOG (The Olney Group). A figure of £1200 was suggested. Ron Bull said that the Fireworks organisers had only found ii necessary to call on the underwriting once in the 20 year history and he was concerned that BOFF might regularly make a loss. Deidre said that BOFF does not have the funds to absorb the loss themselves. Tony Evans said that he had been a member of the BOFF organising committee for its first two years but felt that there was a big difference between BOFF and the Firework Night, which was organised for the Town. BOFF is a commercial event and stall holders make a profit. Although he agreed that it is a fantastic event he said he felt uncomfortable with the request for underwriting. Should the organisers not be looking to the stallholders themselves to make up any loss, he wondered. Mike Hughes said he felt OTC's role should be to encourage trade and visitors to the town and BOFF should be encouraged so he would not want to be part of any refusal. Eventually the requested for underwriting was agreed by a majority vote. 
    Stoke Goldington wind turbines application
    As reported last month, an application has been received to build 15 wind turbines at Stoke Lodge Farm, Stoke Goldington. Deidre Bethune said in her opinion MKC was in no position to consider this application at present because it does not have a current or adequate policy. Last month Jeremy Rawlings reported that the existing policy had not been updated for some time and MKC had been asked to update it to bring in line with national guidelines. In particular, there was no reference to consideration being given to the proximity of existing installations. There then followed a general discussion about the merits of wind power, in general. Colin Rodden said that he believed sustainable energy is required but wondered if data was available to support it. Deidre said the operating companies refused to publish data about the output of such installations, claiming that it was 'commercially sensitive', so it was impossible to know if they were efficient or not. Jeremy Rawlings said that when there is too much power in the grid it is easier to switch off wind turbines than coal fired power stations so the operators are paid to keep them stationary. Tony Evans said that the incentives to farmers to allow wind farms to be sited on their land were enormous so OTC needed to act quickly if they wanted to stop every farmer around having them. Alan Richardson said that if past experience was anything to go by, once an application was submitted there was nothing that OTC or anyone else could do to stop it. Steve Clark disagreed, saying that the Wind Farm at Petsoe End had been the first application submitted to MKC and that had only been passed by a narrow margin, so it was not a foregone conclusion. Although no formal vote was taken, an informal vote showed that the members were overwhelmingly against the proposal. Full details of the planning application, ref 11/01193/FULEIS can be found at http://publicaccess.milton-keynes.gov.uk/ 
    Odds and sods 
    The newly acquired field next to the Charity Field has been sprayed and ploughed and needs to be seeded as soon as possible after the end of August. A number of quotes for seeding have been received and the council agreed to a local quote of £1800. At the moment it is just known as 'the new field', so if anyone has a suggestion for a better name please contact the Town Clerk, or send your suggestion to The Phonebox.  Mike Hughes said that a resident had reported human excrement at the top of the children's slide on Johnson's Field the previous Friday. He had personally attended with cleaning equipment and removed it, but the incident had been repeated the next day. Rosemary Osbourne asked Debbie Brock what was happening about the provision of double yellow lines at the entrance to Chantry Rise, as turning right on to Weston Road was extremely dangerous. Debbie replied that the consultation had recently taken place as part of the process, which was ongoing.  Jeremy Rawlings reported that after 24 years of loyal service Cheryl Wilson's position at the Youth Club had been 'outsourced' by MKC. The promised administrator was yet to appear though.  Steve Clark reported that as of that day Ousedale School had become an academy. Mercury assumes that The Phonebox's invitation to the celebrations got lost in the post.  Tony Evan said that the grass banks on Driftway were a mess and asked that they be strimmed. In fact, all local landscaped areas that are the responsibility of MKC are in a similar state, he said.  Steve Clark said that the inaugural concert by the Olney Community Choir at the Parish Church had been incredibly well attended. Also, the inaugural concert of Olney Brass at the Carlton House Club had been a great success, with a specially commissioned piece of music 'The One and Olney' being played for the first time. In recognition of their support OTC had been presented with a framed copy of the music, which would be hung in the Olney Centre.  Next Meeting - Monday 5th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    Olney Council report for September 2012
    Public Participation
    Simon Barker First up was Simon Barker of Olney Baptist Church, speaking on behalf of all the Churches of Olney. He thanked Olney Town Council (OTC) for its support for the recent Olympics event In the town - the Council had agreed to underwrite the £2,700 cost of the marquee and toilets. He stated that the event had been by the people and for the people of the town, and also thanked the Sports Clubs, The Olney Group, Best Seat In The House, Mike Hughes and others for their contributions towards the day. The event had enjoyed good weather and was well attended, with perhaps 2·3,000 attending through the day. Although its accounts are still provisional, the organisers expect to be able to pay around £1,200 back to OTC, meaning the Council will effectively pay only around £1,500 of the underwriting costs. Leonard Lean Next to speak was Leonard Lean, complete with his own stopwatch to lime the three minutes for which participants in this slot are allowed to speak. As interim coordinator of the Bedford-Olney-Northampton Rail Link Forum, he spoke about its alm to get the track bed of this long closed route restored to full commercial use for both passengers and freight The Forum has been performing a survey of the track bed and believes restoration would be possible. The passenger service would essentially contribute towards a link between Birmingham, Coventry, Luton and Gatwick airports and he envisaged two trains per hour for daytime services.  Sue Warren Last up was Sue Warren, on the familiar topic or parking in Oakdown Crescent. A few weeks before, she'd been advised by Richard Duffill, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Traffic and Parking Team Leader, that he'd appointed a person to carry out a feasibility study on two sites which had the potential to help with the parking issue: 102 Weston Road and the unused garages at the bottom of the Crescent. She felt this represented progress, a feeling reinforced by her receiving an email saying that a parking scheme had been agreed, but then couldn't understand why an auction sign had been erected on the Weston Road site. She concluded by thanking Deirdre Bethune for her previous comments on the Issue,  As background, note that last month's Mercury reported that 102 Weston Road was due to be sold, and that one of the by-products of the sale might be a partial solution to the parking problems in Oakdown Crescent since the property has a large front garden, some of which could be retained and used for parking.  Debbie Brock Debbie Brock responded briefly to Sue, noting that there was a draft plan containing several options but that it had not yet been approved. She explained that all aspects of any scheme had to be considered - Oakdown Crescent did not exist in isolation - and that, while matters were progressing, a scheme had not yet been confirmed. She also noted that, should Jack's land be sold, the Council would retain part of its garden. 
    High Street Bench
    Following on from a topic aired in last month's Public Participation, the Recreations and Services Committee has recommended that a two-seat bench be placed on the pavement outside the United Reform Church, mainly for the benefit ol the elderly. Councillors discussed this, and decided by a majority that the bench would be installed on a trial basis, with reviews after six and 12 months, to which Its two main opponents - the United Reform Church and the Carlton House Club - would be invited to contribute their views.
    East Street Car Park 
    As reported before, OTC has applied for funding to improve the East Street car park. The applications for both phases of this 50% match funding - £32,500 and £25,000 - have been successful.  There was some discussion over whether the dimensions of the proposed additional parking area were adequate, and a small group of Councillors look an action to confirm this. OTC will arrange and advertise a public meeting, likely in October, to explain the proposals.
    Rights of Way
    Back In 2004, OTC submitted an application to MKC to add a lootpath around the Northern and Eastern edges of Doff's Field, plus one from around the centre of its Northern edge running ,diagonally to Its South Eastern corner. Much later, OTC advised MKC that it wished to remove the diagonal path from the application.  The whole matter seems to have progressed slowly, with OTC having just rnceived an email indicating that MKC would shortly be considering the application, and asking OTC to confirm whether it did Indeed wish to remove the diagonal path. After a brief discussion, Councillors agreed that this path should be removed, leaving just that round the two edges.
    Bits 'n' bobs 
    As discussed in June's meeting, funds arising from the Petsoe End Wind Farm would soon become available. Olney now has £7,000 which will be used to install low energy lighting in the Olney Centre and the Market Place toilets.  Tony Evans reported that, having had to postpone their residents' Jubilee Lunch in June, the Ann Hopkins Smith trustees held the lunch late in August and it was a great success.  Jeremy Rawlings reported that the new Youth Leader is Terry Isles, filling the post vacated by Darren Smith.  Ron Bull raised the issue that parking in Spring Lane was sometimes preventing buses from travelling along it as, in one section, pari 
    Public Participation
    Sue Warren First to speak was Sue Warren, on the regular topic of parking in Oakdown Crescent. Sue said she was pleased that Richard Duffill was present but disappointed that over a year had passed since she flrst made the council aware of the situation and it was still not resolved. She said the wheels of local government obviously turned very slowly but this was of no consolation to the elderly residents who wanted a nice place in which to live, not a car park. She also thanked Deidre Bethune for her efforts in seeking a resolution.  Kim Cupper Olney resident Kim Cupper said that he rented two of the garages at the bottom of the crescent and frequently had problems gaining access to them, the problem having worsened in the last few weeks. He pointed out that he pays over £100 per month for the privilege of parking, whereas everyone else parks for free.  Phil Gilbert Next to speak was Phil Gilbert of Beans Cale, responding to recent complaints about tables and chairs encroaching on the footway and blocking mobility scooters. The chairs are 0.6m wide and the pavement is 2.5m wide at that point so there should be plenty of room to pass, he said. However, he recognised that customers sometimes moved the furniture and apologised for the Inconvenience this causes. He also spoke on the issue of the application by Real Estate Advisors Savills, on behalf or Caffe Nero, to open a branch in the building previously occupied by Derby House Saddlery. He said he runs six businesses around the country and loved Olney because it is full of smaller, bespoke shops. He felt that people travel from elsewhere in Milton Keynes because Olney is so different. He contrasted Olney with Stamford which is a town of similar size that has allowed the 'mulltiples' to move in.  Mayor Steve Clark responded saying that the application for conversion or the top floor into flats had been passed and Peter Geary noted that the request for the change of use for the ground floor was still on-going but he remained hopeful of a satisfactory outcome. 
    Update from Richard Dufflll on highways Issues
    Richard started by apologising to Sue Warren for appearing to be so elusive but explained that his was a small but highly stretched team. He said he had been made aware of the Oakdown Crescent situation a year ago and ward councillors Debbie Brock and Peter Geary had been constantly on his back for a resolution! He had also consulted colleagues in the Housing Department, as the problem stemmed from a lack or parking spaces on Weston Road. He was looking at how the land retained from the sale by MKC of 102 Weston Road might be used, as well as a number of other possibihlles. One option would be to make a few additional spaces available in Oakdown Crescent, itself, and he is considering three different schemes to generate up to eight additional spaces although there is a BT pole which would need moving. Most of the land is not adopted and the garages are In private ownership, he explained.  However, none would work without some form of restrictions, i.e. residents' parking permits. since most of the cars currently parked there belong to residents of Weston Road. With regard to the possibility of using the retained land from 102 Weston Road, he said there were issues with the level or the land but none of them are insurmountable. He thought that marked bays could provide parking for eight vehicles but if unmarked could possibly result In a couple more, due to the often discussed 'imaginative parking' techniques adopted elsewhere in the town.  The next steps would be lor all of the schemes to start the consultation process, the result of which could see the approved option being completed this rlnancial year. The use of 102 Weston Road might take a little longer, though, depending on opposition from nearby residents. Jeremy Rawlings didn't think just creating a car park would solve the problem which prompted Richard to ask what problem he was being asked to address, as his understanding was that issue is around access for emergency vehicles and parking for residents. John Sharpe asked ii the proceeds from the sale of 102 Weston Road could be used to fund the scheme but Peter Geary said this was not possible as it had to be used for housing.  Debbie Brock asked Richard for an update on the remodelling of the junction of Weston Road with High Street South (Halleluiah lamppost). Richard said that the original proposals were being revised to include improvements to the Co-op entrance and to make rt more pedestrian friendly. The revised plans will go to full consultatlon before the end of the year with work starling in the next financial year. Likewise, the original Yardley Road plans are being reVlsed to include well laid out parking spaces and Richard said he would return with the plans within the next two months, prior to consultation. 
    Crossing point at Bridge Street/High Street South 
    An email had been received rrom a member of the public pointing out the difficulties of crossing the street with a buggy to get to Emberton Park. Crossing Weston Road by the Co-op means having to negotiate traffic coming from three directions, she said, and the Island near Church Street is not large enough for pedestrians plus buggy so is not sale. An elderly relative had been killed on this stretch of road, she said, and did not want ii to happening again. Richard Dufflll said that the revised scheme would look to address this issue. 
    East Street parking proposals 
    Richard Duffill stayed on for this item, saying that anything that lakes place on East Street has an impact on his department. As reported before, OTC has applied for funding to improve the East Street car park. The applications for both phases of this 50% match funding-1:32,500 and 1:25,000 -have been succ,essful. One scheme is to reconfigure the layout of the existing car park at the front of the Rugby Club to create add11lonal spaces. There are currently 121 marked spaces which would increase 132 or 129 plus 2 disabled spaces, depending on the scheme adopted. Ron Bull quest10ned the need for any changes saying that an additional 46 cars had managed to park for a recent sporting event {presumably using the lore mentioned 'imaginative parking' techniques!). Tony Evans said that was precisely why changes were needed, since that had resulted in a number of correctly parked cars being blocked in.  The second and more controversial plan is to provide 36 spaces on a new parking area on East Street behind the goal posts of the lootball pitch. There then followed a discussion on whether this was the best location for the new area. It was suggested that perhaps the current grassed area to the north of the Football Club might be better. {Mercury was seen to reooil In horror at this suggesllon, since this is the site for 'Booze on the Ouse', highlight of Olney's social and musical calendar).  Fortunately, Tony Evans said that this would not be appropriate since this area ,s used for training and would also present problems for access. Mercury wondered if the perfectly flat grassed area behind the nearby hedge might prove a better location but since at least one member or the Bowls Club was present, decided to keep his own counsel.  Tony Evans was keen to emphasise that both schemes were not just for the benefit of the sports clubs but would alleviate some of the parking problems in the town. Jeremy Rawlings disagreed, saying that the sports clubs would be the main benefactors. The proor of this is that the East Street car park is empty for most of the week. Tony replied saying that the council need to educate the public that the car park Is there and available. People do not like to park 'round the back' and walk to the shops but at least having the additional spaces directly on East Street would make them more visible. 
    Odds 'n' sods
    Rosemary Osbourne reported back from the NAG (Neighbourhood Action Group) on the Dog Control Order proposals which had prompted some correspondence to The Phonebox, emphasising that the intention was not to stop people walking dogs but to do It more responsibly. MKC have suggested that OTC might like to take over the running of the Youth Club as part of the Community Asset Transfer Scheme.  John Sharpe noted that a number of pathways are becoming overgrown by hedges, particularly by Emberton Park. Peter Geary replied that most of the overgrowing hedges are not owned by MKC and cutting them could set an expectation that MKC would continue to do so, although he admitted that the one by the park is under their ownership.  Deidre Bethune said that comments had been made to her about the purple colour scheme adopted by the shop that has replaced 'Aubergine'.  Mercury - what do you think? Just because the High Street is a conservation area should MKC planners be able to dictate the colours that owners can paint their properties, or does a splash of colour make it more interesting?  Your thoughts are welcome through The Phonebox. 
    Olney Council report for November 2012
    Public Participation
    Mark Luckin First to speak was Mark Luckin of The Olney Group (TOG). He explained that Fireworks Night was due to be held on Sunday 4th November but, due to heavy rain and the resulting very poor ground conditions, TOG had decided to postpone it until Saturday 10th November - felt to be the best date available while avoiding Remembrance Day. Mark ended with a call for more helpers on the night, as the postponement meant it was proving hard to get marshals and gate people at such short notice. Elaine Herniman  Second up was Elaine Herniman from the Olney Allotment Holders Association. She was disappointed that the Council's Recreations and Services Committee had recommended, without consultation, that on­site bonfires be banned. She explained that Royal Horticultural Society guidelines recommended that burning was the best way to dispose of plants affected by blight, club root, etc. Elaine concluded by saying that this had the potential to undermine the relationship between the allotment holders and the Council.  Steve Clark Steve Clark spoke briefly at this point to say that, while the issue had indeed been discussed by the Recreations and Services Committee, its decision was to consult first with allotment holders. It hadn't done so yet and so had not recommended anything to full Council. 
    East Street parking proposals 
    Tony Evans reported that, as a result of the recent Public Meeting, the Recreations and Services Committee was recommending to full Council that the planned alterations to the existing East Street Car Park should go ahead. Although the total was not yet costed, 50% of it would be paid for by Milton Keynes Council (MKC).  However, Tony explained that the Public Meeting found the additional car park area at the top of the Nursery Field adjacent to East Street to be much more controversial, with around half the those attending being in favour and half against. In any case, it would likely need planning permission, so the Committee recommended that Olney Town Council (OTC) seek pre-planning advice from MKC, at a cost of around £200.  Councillors all voted in favour the alterations to the existing East Street Car Park bar one against - Ron Bull, who noted that the resulting number of spaces, while greater than that currently marked, was less than that currently achieved in practice. Councillors also voted in favour of seeking pre-planning advice about the additional parking area.
    Allotment bonfires 
    Tony Evans introduced this topic, saying that the Recreations and Services Committee would consult with the allotment holders, as was said in its last meeting. There followed a somewhat arcane discussion on how this information had been passed to the allotment holders. The main point is that they will be consulted.
    Hedge laylng
    OTC had received a quote for £2,300 to hedge the boundary between the Allotments Field and the newly purchased Crouch's Field. Tony Evans noted that the right time of year to do the job would be between now and the end of February. 
    Rights of way 
    As reported in an earlier Mercury, back in January 2004 OTC submitted an application to MKC to add a footpath around the Northern and Eastern edges of Doff's Field, plus one from around the centre of its Northern edge running diagonally to its South Eastern corner. Later, OTC advised MKC that it wished to remove the diagonal path from the application.  Continuing apace, it has now been resolved that there is no evidence that the diagonal path across Doff's Field should become a public right of way. The decision on the status of the path around the Northern and Eastern edges of Doffs Field and continuing South along the riverbank to the bridge to Clifton Reynes has been deferred until January 2013, to allow any further evidence to be collected.
    Youth Centre 
    Steve Clark explained that MKC owns the Olney Youth Centre building, and provides a yearly grant towards its running costs. Councillors discussed whether OTC should express an interest in obtaining the building and, it was assumed, the land behind it under the Community Asset Transfer scheme. Peter Geary stated that this could move quite quickly, perhaps being concluded in around six months. A small group of Councillors will be set up to progress this issue. 
    Traffic Issues 
    Debbie Brock introduced this item. She'd corresponded with a local resident about traffic issues in the West Street area and noted that, if the Council was minded, it could redirect MKC officers to consider the traffic issues there. At the same time, she acknowledged that it was far from being the only awkward traffic area in the town. This started a wide ranging discussion and, summarising, there were two outcomes. First, the Council would re-assess the Yardley road junction plans, due from MKC shortly. Second, it would consider producing a Neighbourhood Plan, as this would give local people more say over the town's development. 
    Berrells Court 
    The extremely poor condition of Berrells Court, off East Street, is causing concern. Councillors passed around pictures of the road and it was clear that things were far from satisfactory, with huge areas of standing water covering much of the surface.  Dedire Bethune felt passionately that it was dangerous and a "disgusting tip". She felt the situation had to be sorted out, in spite of difficulties about who owned the land. Other Councillors backed up Deidre in her view. She noted that uncertainty over who owned the land was a problem, and that there was some dependency on a Planning Permission granted nine months ago, and which remained valid for another two years and three months.  Peter Geary noted that a condition of this Permission was that the road surface should be brought up to standard, with tarmac and drainage, before construction could start. Liam Costello believed that this condition was effectively stopping the development -presumably due to the expense of improving the road. John Boardman concluded the discussion by suggesting that OTC initiate a meeting of all the interested parties. Councillors agreed with this. 
    Market Place toilets 
    Liam Costello Liam Costello reported that work on the toilets was progressing well, and that delivery of the stainless steel furniture was awaited. Tony said it appeared that the hot and cold water sink for the Market traders had been removed from the store room and, as the specification didn't say it should be removed, it needed to be returned. 
    Traka 
    Steve Clark had been invited to Traka, www.traka.com, a local business, in celebration of it being awarded its third Queen's Award for Enterprise. He'd most enjoyed the day, feeling the tour was "stunning". As background, he explained that the company had been founded in 1995 with four people, and had now grown to around 100. 
    Odds and sods
    Next Meeting - Monday 3rd December The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 3rd December In the Council Chamber In the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    Olney Council report for December 2012
    Public Participation
    Peter Gage First to speak was Peter Gage on the subject of dog fouling. Peter said he attended a recent Neighbourhood Action Group (NAG) meeting in order to dispel some of the myths around the issue. The NAG was claiming that a recent survey had shown this to be the biggest concern in the minds of the people of Olney, but this was ʻnonsenseʼ, he said. The survey had only interviewed 80 people, which is around 1.6% of the population. An inspection of the recreation ground by enforcement officers from Milton Keynes Council (MKC) had concluded that it was as clean as anywhere in Milton Keynes. Peter said that he regularly refereed football matches for Olney Town Colts and had personally only experienced one occurrence of dog fouling on the pitch, but he did concede that it was more of a problem on the main pitch in front of the Football Club. He did not think that a Dog Control Order (DCO) forcing owners to keep their dogs on a lead would make any difference. This subject was a later item on the meeting agenda. Carol Barrett Next to speak was Berrells Court resident Carol Barrett on the subject of the poor state of the road surface in that area, following the discussion at last monthʼs meeting. She said she had raised the issue a year ago but nothing had happened, apart from the fact that it had actually got worse and one resident had had a fall due to the problem. She reminded the council that planning permission for building had been granted, subject to renovation of the surface, but that could be a long time coming, she felt.
    Berrells Court
    Although this did not appear to be a formal agenda item this month, it was discussed at last monthʼs meeting so the discussion continued under Matters Arising. Deidre Bethune said the situation was a ʻcrying shameʼ and she fully supported Carol Barrettʼs efforts. John Sharp said that the Land Registry show that Berrells Court has not been adopted as part of the public highway. He had spoken to a number of property owners, some of whom had indicated a willingness to pay for the repairs but, equally, there were those who would not. No formal estimate appears to exist to indicate how much the remedial work would cost but MKC Ward Councillor Peter Geary said that in his opinion one should be obtained in order to ʻmop upʼ any unclaimed grants from MKC. If a simple covering of tarmac was laid it would probably need doing again in two to three years, he said, and thought the best option would be to lay proper drainage and seek adoption by MKC. Deidre Bethune pointed out that the required standards for adoption are very high but agreed that it should be the preferred option. Carol Barrett spoke again, saying that adoption and repair would mainly benefit the developer who would be building and then selling the proposed new property and she, personally, would be happy for remedial work short of adoption.
    Dog fouling on recreation ground
    Following the recent inspection and report by MKC about the issue, Tony Evans said it was news to him that there is NOT a problem! He thought that getting the MKC enforcement officers involved would identify persistent offenders, with possible prosecutions. Jeremy Rawlings wondered that if the ʻprofessionalsʼ said there was no problem and Peter Gage was of the same opinion then perhaps it was not an issue. Deidre Bethune disagreed, saying that even if responsible dog owners picked up their dogsʼ mess it often got ʻsmeared aroundʼ leaving some behind. Jeremy wondered if dog faeces is actually more dangerous than that of the wild animals that would naturally use the field. Mayor Steve Clark said that the problem is Toxocara Canis and Toxocara Cati that is present in dog and cat faeces, respectively. John Sharp suggested that the solution might be to ban dogs altogether from marked out pitches and fines could be imposed for offenders. Peter Geary observed that the enforcement officers cannot be there all of the time and it was no surprise that owners cleared up while they were there observing. He suggested that there could be three distinct areas:
    • Dogs not allowed
    • Where dogs are allowed on a lead
    • Where dogs are allowed to run free
    Peter Gage interjected, saying that a DCO was not appropriate, considering that most pitches were only used for two to three hours a week during three or four months of the year. Tony Evans pointed out that the recreation ground is used for other events, such as the highly successful Olympic Opening celebration, when two to three thousand people had sat down on the grass. He described dog fouling as an ʻevil thingʼ. Peter Geary said there would be no point in imposing a DCO if it was not enforced. Deidre Bethune said that unless something is illegal the police would not be interested in enforcing it and Jeremy Rawlings was of the opinion that dog fouling is not actually illegal unless it is on the public highway. John Sharp suggested using the Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) but Peter Geary said that would only be possible if Thames Valley Police agree and the Chief Constableʼs view would no doubt be that PCSOs should concentrate on crime prevention. He recommended that the council press ahead with seeking a DCO otherwise the issue would continue to go ʻround and roundʼ with no resolution. Steve Clark closed the subject by saying that Rob Ward from MKC Environmental Services would be invited to the next meeting of the Recs and Services Committee.
    Market Place parking
    This issue is frequently discussed at meetings of OTC. The council have always resisted the idea of formally marked out parking spaces because it would reduce the theoretical number of spaces that are available due to ʻimaginativeʼ parking. However, this relies on the first cars that park each day doing so in a manner that allows two rows down the middle. If this does not happen then the number of spaces is considerably reduced for the rest of that day. John Sharp said that the council had previously suggested the marking of a single white line down the centre of the car park to show where cars should park nose to tail. Ron Bull suggested that this should be done on a temporary basis to see if it is adhered to. It was agreed that a small group of councillors will investigate this option.
    Farmersʼ Market hot food
    As reported previously, the council have agreed to overturn the ban on hot takeaway food being sold at the market and as a result have had a request from a start-up Olney company wishing to sell Paella. Tony Evans suggested that before giving them the go-ahead on a permanent basis they should be invited to have a ʻguest spotʼ so that they can be audited to ensure that they use locally sourced ingredients, where possible. Mercury understands that they use poultry from a local farm, so presumably this wonʼt be an issue.
    Model T Ford Rally
    A letter had been received from the organisers of this event on Friday June 7th 2013, requesting reserved parking spaces for about 45 cars. Councillors agreed that the obvious place for this would be the Market Place but recognised that closing the Market Place for any length of time could impact trade. The upside could be that it might attract visitors and the exhibitors would possibly eat in the town. John Boardman said that it would only attract visitors if the event was sufficiently well advertised and hoped that the organisers would do so. It was suggested that the market would be closed until 3.00pm and Deidre Bethune would consult the Chamber of Trade. 
    Booze on the Ouse
    A letter had been received from Olney Town Colts informing the council that this popular event would be taking place on Saturday June 29th 2013. This was noted and agreed, but also pointed out that this should have come in as a request because it is held on OTC land. Tony Evans said that he really did not like the title of the event as it sends out completely the wrong message.
    Odds and sods
    Steve Clark reported that the refurbished toilets on the Market Place were now open, but did not say if he had performed an official opening ceremony. Andrew Dooley has resigned from the council due to work commitments, so a vacancy now exists. The period during which residents can demand a by-election was due to expire at midnight on the day of the meeting so it is assumed that the vacancy will be filled by co-option. Any resident wishing to stand should get in touch with the Town Clerk at the Olney Centre. Rosemary Osbourne asked when the issue of extending the yellow lines at the entrance to Chantry Rise would be resolved and Peter Geary said that the process of consultation is on-going, but he had received a letter asking that the existing lines are NOT extended.  John Sharp noted that the overhanging hedges by Emberton Park had still not been cut back by MKC and Peter Geary replied that it was on the list of work to be done but the recent bad weather had caused a back-log.
    Next Meeting - Monday 7th January The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th January in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.

    Mercury's reports for 2011
    ·       January 2011
    Olney Council report for January 2011
    Public participation
    Tim Regan Coneygere resident Tim Regan spoke at the start of this month's meeting. Tim explained that he was there to present a 'human face' on an issue which has been the subject of some discussion at council meetings over the last few months. This matter was an item later on the agenda but for information, Tim has a large tree growing outside his house, number 6, which is threatening lo undermine the foundations and he wants to have It removed. Olney Town Council's (OTC) position has been that this is a matter between him and the builder, since the tree was there when the house was built and the builder should have provide the house with suitable footings.  Tim was at pains to point out that he is not 'anti-tree' and if it were possible to put the offending tree on wheels and move it elsewhere he would be delighted, but the fact is that it is knocking down his house. Due to the age of the house (some 20 years, believes Mercury) Tim said he did not think it practical to go back to the builders and, although he would be sad to see it go, removal is the only option.
    Drlftway 
    It is possible that an end to the long running saga of the Drittway landscaping may be in sight. Attending the meeting was John Price Millon Keynes Council (MKC) Neighbourhood Manager for Environmental Services for Rural Areas and his assistant, Rob Ward. John said that there were a number of options available to resolve the problem: 1. Do nothing and continue with efforts to establish wild flowers on the existing banks. Cost to be met by developer. 2. Keep the exlstlng profile, remove the wild flowers, and establish topsoil and amenity grass. Cost approx £10,000 to be met by MKC. 3. Reshape the Mound and establish amenity grass. Full cost in region of £120,000 to be met by MKC. John explained that the original problem with option 2 had been that the banks were too steep to be maintained by traditional mowing equipment, but as a result of an accident elsewhere MKC had been obliged to purchase equipment which could mow the banks. He said some preliminary investigations had been done into option 3 and presented the plans to the council. The reshaping would have the effect of reducing the overall height of the bank by 1.5m and the soil removed would be used to fill the existing gap. The downside was that some residents would now have a view across to the industrial estate opposite, which the mound currently blocks. Dave Price was concerned that OTC should consult the affected residents, but Steve Clark said any reshaping would require planning permission which would necessitate notification to the residents who could then express their opinion. Tony Evans said that the options presented were no different to those offered by MKC six months ago. The situation had now changed in that it would be possible to leave the profile of the banks as they are and sow with grass which could now be mown, although he thought that £10,000 to 'sow grass on a heap of soil was very expensive!'. He thought it a waste of lime to even consider the more expensive plan which had no chance of getllng approved. If a decent sward could be grown on the existing banks without invasion by weeds and thistles then that was the obvious choice, he said. Jeremy Rawlings felt that to spend £120,000 of MKC's ratepayers' money on what was essentially cosmetic work was "obscene" in the present financial climate. At this stage Mayor Mike Hughes reminded the meeting that it was not OTC that had bought the proposals to the table, but MKC. Rob Ward said that the costs quoted were worst case scenarios and agreed tha1 they appeared very expensive but warnted to ensure that all options were put before OTC so that they could make an informed decision. Dave Price once again suggested that local residents should be consulted but Mike Hughes believed that this would not be necessary for the preferred option 2, since there was now no intention to reshape the mound which had been constructed in line with the original planning permission. Steve Clark proposed that the council progress with option 2 and the vote was passed unanimously. 
    Planning Items 
    Steve Clark reported that a notification had been received from MKC concerning development of land to the rear of 57 and 59 Moores Hill. At this point Tony Evans declared an interest, having relatives living nearby. One of these houses is privately owned and the other is owned by MKC. The property owned by MKC has a covenant preventing further building taking place on the plot, which it will be seeking to relax. The intention then would be to apply for planning permission to build three new houses on the combined plot, with access from Dinglederry, although that would be subject of a separate request for Planning Permission. Steve reminded the council that such infill requests had been rejected in the past and said they would need to decide whether or not to object to this one in principle. Deidre Bethune said that this appeared to go against government policy ol not splitting up gardens for development. She also noted that intention appeared to be to limit the number of houses to three and wondered if that would be fair on other residents in the area who might then wish to sell ol land in a similar lashion. Ron Bull asked if the scheme would help towards MKC's quota of new houses but Deidre said that infill does not count towards the quota Mike Hughes, possibly playing devil's advocate, asked if OTC should not be supporting what appeared to be a workable plan which would raise money for cash-strapped MKC and was likely to go ahead in any case. Tony Evans emphasised the need to consult the nearby residents, since 15-20 houses in total could be seriOusly impacted. He felt that it was important that the matter should be dealt with correcuy by MKC, since they own part of the land, will sell it to a developer and will be responsible for granting planning permission. Mike Hughes reminded the members that the plans before them only related lo the disposal of the land and not any subsequent building and that residents would get the chance to comment when planning permission was requested. He proposed the motion that the council should thank MKC for the consultation and reserve comment for any subsequent planning request, which was passed on a vote.  The matter of the tree outside number 6 Coneygere was discussed under this agenda item. Tony Evans said it was clear that the tree had been there when the house was built but if the owner asked for permission to remove It and replace with two trees in the cemetery that would be acceptable. Mike Hughes said that OTC would not wish to be seen as intransigent on the matter and suggested that the council should allow the tree to be removed, so long as It was not at a cost to MKC. Della Cheal wondered if the owner's insurance would cover the cost of removing the tree. At this point Standing Orders were suspended and Tim Regan was invited to speak. Tim confirmed that he had building insurance and hoped that ii would cover such costs. Standing Orders were then reintroduced and a vote taken recommending that MKC be requested to remove the offending tree, which was passed unanimously. 
    Councillors' email addresses
    Jeremy Rawlings explained that OTC has use of the domain 'olneytowncouncil.gov.uk' which can be used as a suffix for members' personalised email addresses, e.g. JeremyRawlings@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk This provides a standard format which would make it easier for members of the public to contact their councillors, rather than the current collection of individual email addresses, he said. If they did not want a personal email published then members could opt for admin@olneytowncouncil.gov.uk, which would go the Town Clerk for onward distribution. The proposal, whilst apparently acceptable to most members generated a surprising amount of anger and hostility from some, who appeared not to like having such a 'label' imposed upon them. John Sharp felt that councillors should be free to decide if they wanted to publish their existing personal email addresses and Deidre Bethune felt they were being treated like naughty school children and being told what to do. In any case, she never gets any emails from members of the public so what does it matter, she said. Eventually it was decided to allow members to publish their existing personal addresses If they really want to. 
    Bits 'n' Bobs
    A letter had been received from Mark Luckin of The Olney Group (TOG) who organise the annual Fireworks Night. TOG has donated £500 to OTC in recognition of the fact that OTC underwrites the event every year in case of financial loss. The underwriting has only had to be called upon once in the entire history of this popular event.  Tony Evans reported that a vacancy had arisen at the Ann Hopkins Smith Almshouses and any elderly female resident of the town wishing to take it up should contact him.  Steve Clark reported that the Whirly Pit had frozen over in the recent cold spell, resulting in the loss or many, if not all of the fish. The pit is under the ownership of MKC, who had apparently made no effort to prevent it from freezing over or to remove the dead fish, resulting in something of a bad smell. Mike Hughes suggested an agenda item for a future meeting lo propose that OTC take ownership, enabling the council's own workers to maintain it.  Deidre Bethune said that there had been much confusion about refuse collection over the Christmas period, resulting in refuse bags lying around for over two weeks. The MKC website slated that there would be a collection between Christmas and the New Year but it was not until Christmas Eve that an email had been sent to the Town Clerk confirming that the next scheduled collection would be Tuesday January 4th, which was then too late lo advertise. Jeremy Rawlings reminded the council that only last month they had decided not to progress with training for the Clerk on the use of Social Media (e.g. Facebook, Twitter etc.) which would have been an Ideal method of distributing such news.  Next Meeting - Monday 7th February The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th February in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    ·       February 2011
    Olney Council report for February 2011
    A Full but Brief Meeting
    Despite there being a very full agenda for this month's meeting. Deputy Mayor Steve Clark managed to keep the meeting moving at a brisk pace. This was In no small part due to locally produced ale 'Hopping Mad' being on sale at The Swan for £1 a pint on this particular evening!* 
    Public Participation
    Although the council chamber was packed with members of the public, none of them were there to speak at the beginning of the meeting. II transpired that most ol them were there for the meeting referred to in the first agenda item and left as soon as it had been discussed. 
    Future of Healthcare in Milton Keynes
    Present at the meeting was Gill Prager, Director of Quality and Governance for Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust Gill was there to present to the council the proposals set out in the consultation document 'Shaping the Future of Healthcare in Milton Keynes' and afterwards to hold one of a series of 'Tell Us' meetings at which the public would have an opportunity to speak to NHS staff about the specific proposals. Gill explained that the NHS is facing Its toughest financial challenge and most radical reorganisation since it was created in 1948. NHS Milton Keynes is responslble for providing healthcare service for all people registered with General Practitioner (GP) surgeries In Milton Keynes. as well as dentists, hospitals and community services. It has an annual budget of £360 million which rise by less than 0.5% per year over the next few years, despite the fact that the populalion Is rising and becoming increasingly elderly. It has been overspending for some time and as a result the hospital, alone, is £5 million in the red. II will not be possible to continue to provide the same level of services, so ways must be found or providing better services for more people with less money and to claw back some of the deficit. The reorganisation will see the end of Primary Healthcare trusts. she said, and in preparation for that NHS MK had already reduced its managers and administration statr by 40"/4. The consultation document refers to 'thresholds' which are guidelines for GPs to follow to when assessing patients· needs for treatment. Deidre Bethune asked Gill how sticking to these thresholds would save money? GIii said that GPs do not currenUy stick to the current guidelines and will refer patients for treatment according to their professional opinions, regardless of the guideflnes and cost. For many types of treatment new thresholds will be introduced which GPs will be obliged to comply with. This will reduce the number of patients undergoing those treatments, thus saving money, she said. Jeremy Rawlings said that this would lead to people suffering and singled out the new threshold for hip replacement patients lo be unable to walk more than 250 metres as rediculous. Gill acknowledged that in some cases it may mean more people having to suffer pain for longer. The consultation period runs untll Friday 25th February, so may well be over by the time you read this report, but the document can be downloaded from www.mlltonkeynes.nhs.uk/discussion2011.htm 
    Driftway
    Tony Evans reported that he had had a meeting with John Prloe, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Neighbourhood Manager for Environmental Services for Rural Areas, and his assistant Rob Ward. It had been agreed that the mound would be left with the existing profile, although there were concerns about the quality of the existing topsoil. MKC are looking to see if they can come to a financial agreement with Wimpey's, the developers. Tony emphasised that !the work must be done this spring and said that John and Rob were keen to resolve the Issue. 
    Infants School
    Jeremy Rawlings reported that as of February 1 st the school had obtained Foundation status, which Is the first stage to becoming an Academy. The Governors now own the land and buildings so the switch over to full academy status can happen any lime. with June 1st being the probable date. 
    Olney Brass Band
    Tony Moroney, Chairman of Stantonbury Brass, presented a proposal to change their name to 'Olney Brass'. Tony explained that the band would shortly lose its main source of funding and would have to fold on April 1st unless an alternative source of funding could be found. The proposal was to change the name and form a closer allegiance to the town and request some funding from OTC. As a working band, they would look to be as self supportive as possible and raise money through member subscriptions, engagements and concerts. They would also apply for charitable status. which would also bring financial benefit through the gift aid scheme, he said. The band has 12 residents of Olney and Emberton amongst its strength of 25, 4 of whom are founder members. Throughout its 30 - 40 year existence Olney has featured more than anywhere else in !their regular performances, whether through its annual Christmas concert, Dickens of a Christmas, various fates and carolling. Over the years it would be lair to say that the band enjoyed a stronger affiliation with Olney, than with either Stantonbury or Milton Keynes, he said. Younger members of the band progress. both as Individuals and as musicians and often go on to study music at university. The band were particularly proud of two of their current young players, one of whom has been offered a place at The Royal Northern College, whilst his own 15 year old son has been accepted Into The National Youth Brass Band. As part of their commitment to Olney and the surrounding area it is also the intention to form an Olney Brass Development band, which would be available to all brass players who have attained at least grade 3 and it is hoped that they would be able to offer this opportunity free to members less than 18 years of age. The council members seemed generally happy to endorse the name change and the issue or funding was referred to the Finance Committee. 
    Cobbs Garden Surgery - Specialist Nurse for the Elderly
    Carol Russell of Cobbs Garden Patient Participation Group was present to request OTC funding of a Specialist Nurse for the Elderly. Carol explained that that the surgery had employed an ex•Dlstrict Nurse for the past two years, funded by Milton Keynes PCT. This funding had now been withdrawn so the present incumbent would be made redundant. She said that a letter in The Phonebox requesting local businesses, charities and MKC to provide sponsorship had met with only a limited response, so It was vital that funding be found from elsewhere. The intention would be to separate the post from the surgery so that it belonged to the community rather than the surgery, but the surgery would continue lo provide racllities such as a desk, computer and phone. The current post holder was employed for 15 hours a week working with people who were soclally isolated, lonely and anxious. Many of these people need time to be listened to, and practical help In many ways, such as filling out forms to claim attendanoe allowance etc. Carol said that in order to keep the nurse employed for a year they would need £13,500. Deidre Bethune, as Chair of the Finance Committee, was concerned that It would need to be an ongoing grant and wondered if OTC could be liable for redundancy payments if the post could not be maintained. Carol said she was optimistic that funding might be forthcoming from elsewhere for future years. Deidre said that. Deidre said that the Finance Committee were minded to fund the post for a year at a cost of £13,500 and proposed that the full council approve the recommendation, which they did unanimously on a vote. 
    Bits n Bobs
    The Parish Precept {the amount of Olney residents' Council Tax which goes directly to OTC) will once again be retained at the existing rate.  The council agreed to purchase laptop for the Town Clerk and Deputy at a cost of £498+VAT to include relevant Microsoft software.  A vacancy exists for the Chair of the Personnel Committee. New member Colin Rodden was nominated and selected but then deselected on a pint of order, possibly the shortest tenure of any committee chairman on the council!  Next Meeting - Monday 7th March The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 7th March in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members ol the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.  *It had sold out by the lime Mercury arrived.
    ·       March 2011
    Olney Council report for March 2012
    Public Participation
    Chris Talbot Chris Talbot, Treasurer of Olney Rugby Club, opened this month's meeting. He explained that Olney has enjoyed splendid sports facilities due to Olney Town Council (OTC) and the Sports Clubs. Olney Rugby Club now owns ten acres of land freehold and the Club's Management Committee has decided to proceed down a limited liability company route, splitting the Club into two parts: one to hold the assets and the other to run the activities and provide the facilities while maintaining the status required for gift aid, etc.  He asked if OTC would let the Club acquire the freehold of the land on which the clubhouse stands in exchange for a suitable sum, thus giving it the freehold of both the clubhouse and the adjacent field. If this was approved, he noted that the Club would be happy for there to be a covenant restricting the land's use to being for a clubhouse. 
    Census for England and Wales
    Richard Izzard. responsible for coordinating the Census for Olney, Newport Pagnell, Astwood and Stoke Goldington, gave a detailed talk about it. The main point is that, if you've not submitted yours by the time you read this - get a move on!
    Olney Rugby Club 
    The first item to be considered in the meeting proper was Chris Talbot's request for the Club to acquire the freehold of the land on which the clubhouse stands. Two Councillors. Tony Evans and John Smail, had declared a personal interest in this item, meaning they could discuss but not vote on it.  Mike Hughes introduced the topic, explaining that the Bowls Club owns its own clubhouse while the Tennis, Crick.et, Rugby and Football Clubs do not. He invited Councillors' views. Tony spoke in favour of granting the request, seeing nothing wrong with it. John Sharp spoke against ii. feeling that the Council should try to benefit the whole town and not Just the Rugby Club. Dave Price spoke in favour, noting that the Club does benefit the whole town - through sport and other community activities such as quiz and charity nights. Finally, Ron Bull asked how the Council would come to a decision as to what the freehold was worth, Gill Edmonson noting that, as achieving best value is a Council requirement, this would indeed have to be done properly. Ron believed it would have a high value, while Mike Hughes disagreed, due to the covenant which would be associated with the land.  Councillors voted by majority of seven to one, with two abstentions, in favour of obtaining legal advice and furthering the discussion with the Rugby Club. 
    Environmental Services 
    Rob Ward, Milton Keynes Council Neighbourhood Manager for Environmental Services, gave a presentation. Note that Rob's title is as stated here and not, as stated previously, the assistant to that post.  In the first part of his presentation, Rob explained that he manages the delivery of Environmental Services in the rural parts of Milton Keynes (MK) Borough, covering waste collection, landscape, highway maintenance, play area maintenance and neighbourhood enforcement. Savings of around 30% would have to be made in the next lour years, which would require choices of what could and could not be achieved, alongside ensuring the best use of resources. Readers who wish to report a problem with any of the services Rob manages should call 01908 252570. 
    Driftway
    The second part of Rob's presentation concerned the Drlftway banks. As background, note that in the previous meeting, John Price and Rob Ward had presented three options to resolve the problem ...  1. Do nothing and continue with efforts to establish wild flowers on the existing banks. Cost to be met by the developer. 2. Keep the existing profile, remove the wild flowers, and establish topsoil and amenity grass. Cost approx £10,000 to be met by MKC. 3. Reshape the mound and establish amenity grass. Full cost in region of  £120,000 to be met by MKC. ... and the Council had voted unanimously in favour of option 2. At the time, the Driltway banks were believed not to have been adopted by MKC.  Since then, Rob had discovered that MKC's Highways department had in fact adopted the Driftway banks, although the Section 106 element relating to completion of the landscaping had not been signed off. The results of this were that MKC may not have as much negotiating power with the developer, Taylor Wimpey, as previously thought. However, independent of that. Rob stressed that MKC remained committed to completing the works on Driftway.  Rob proposed two new options:  A. Plant grass and shrubs in six inches of topsoil then cut approximately six times per year. Costs: £8,500 to Implement, £900 per year to cut. Summary: high potential for success, attractive, higher ongoing cost. B. Plant further mixed species and wild flowers In a thin layer of topsoil, providing new growth and encouraging what's there to develop, then cut twice a year. Costs: £3,200 to implement, £300 per year to cut. Summary: Higher biodiversity, fairly attractive, lower maintenance cost. Mike Hughes stated that option A was basically that agreed by OTC in its previous meeting, that this was what should be done and that suggesting a cheaper alternative was merely MKC trying to ease its way into doing less and less work.  This was debated at length and the following is a just brief summary. Tony Evans felt that only option A was likely to be successful. Deidre Bethune suggested a compromise, planting mixed species and wild flowers in six inches of topsoil. Both Tony Evans and Mike Hughes wanted MKC to stick to the original agreement, option A, and commit to an ear1y planting date in order to increase the chance of a successful outcome.  Rob Ward agreed to follow option A, with the work to be done 'in weeks' and certainly before the end of April. 
    Market costs 
    For each Thursday Market, the Council hires a skip and cleaning service to complete tidying up after the stallholders have left. This costs £322 per week which, put another way, represents 44% of each stall's weekly rent. As the skip doesn't get particularly full, the Council discussed whether it and the cleaning service provided were worth continuing with. No decision was made, though the issue will be explored further. 
    More doggy do
    There'd been an incident during a Rugby match on Doffs Field where a player had fallen into some dog poo, which caused his eye to swell up. This raised the issue of dog fouling in general, which continues to be a problem on the Sports Fields. Although no decision was made, it's likely that around ten additional signs will be placed around the Fields to ensure there's no doubt that the practice is illegal.
    Personnel Committee Chair
    In February, Della Cheal stepped down from being Chair of the Personnel Committee. She was generally acknowledged to have been very good at this role, and Councillors were keen to fill the vacant position. As reported in last month's Mercury, Colin Rodden had been selected for the post and then immediately deselected on a point of order. The issue was that he wasn't a Committee Chair, Standing Order 16 stating that the 'Personnel Committee (is) to be formed from Chairpersons of Committees but to include one female Councillor if possible'.  Councillors now considered whether the wording should be changed to 'Personnel Committee to be formed from Chairpersons of Committees or suitably qualified Personnel Officer and to include one female Councillor if possible'. John Sharp did not like this at all, standing up and stating that, if this happened, "I'll resign as of now. You are altering things to suit the Council. It's corrupt." Mike Hughes explained that the issue was being brought before Council for a decision, as per usual procedure. Deidre Bethune and Gill Edmonson also attempted to pour oil on troubled waters. However, all this seemed to make little difference and John left the Council Chamber.  Ron Bull felt some sympathy with John, believing that Councillors setting the rules for the year then changing them arbitrarily part way through ii was starting down a slippery slope. Mike Hughes declared himself "staggered" by John's reaction. After further discussion, the Standing Order was not changed, the issue instead being deferred to the next annual meeting. 
    Blooming competitions 
    Councillors decided to enter Olney for the Tindal Cup, the only category in the Best Kept Village competition it can enter this time round, having won the Best Kept Town award last year. Then they decided, as last year, not to enter Olney for Britain in Bloom. 
    Conygere tree
    As reported in last month's Mercury, 6 Conygere was built close to a large tree which is now threatening to undermine the building's foundations. The tree is on OTC's land and, as the Council has now received a solicitor's letter on the subject, it passed the issue to its own solicitors.  Next Meeting - Monday 4th April The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 4th April in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    ·       April 2011
    Olney Council report for April 2012
    Public Participation
    No member of the public present wished to speak at this month's meeting. 
    Land Purchase 
    Mayor Mike Hughes announced that the council had completed the purchase of a piece of land although no details of the land or the purchase price were provided. Subsequent enquiries by Mercury revealed that ii comprises seven acres of land to the south of the Charity Field used by the Football and Rugby Clubs and the aim is to use this for casual recreational use with no formal pitch markings. It is not known when it will be available for public use or what preparation needs to be done, apart from providing an entrance via the Charity Field.
    Conygere tree
    Mike Hughes reported that following the solicitor's letter received on the subject of the tree adjacent to 6 Conygere, the council's solicitor has responding pointing out "the error of their ways". No response had been received as of yet, he said. 
    Fly the flag
    The existing flagpole on the front of the Olney Centre is no longer serviceable and needs to be repaired or replaced. One of the options being considered is to replace it with a new lightweight freestanding pole concreted Into the centre of the garden circular planting area, at a cost of approximately £600. Jeremy Rawlings asked why ii was necessary to have a flagpole at the Olney Centre when there are already two on the Markel Place, but Tony Evans pointed out that they are managed by the British Legion. Tony said that in his opinion ii the centre was to have a flagpole then it was important for the council to 'fly the flag'. Mike Hughes said he would like to see the flag flown on special occasions, such as Veteran's Day and the forthcoming royal wedding. One member suggested that perhaps it should be flown when the Clerk, Gill Edmondson was 'in residence'! 
    Planning Applications
    Olney Town Council is not a planning authority but is consulted about any applications in the parish by Milton Keynes Council. An application has been made for the erection of two 2 bedroom premises at 8 Berrells Court. Steve Clark said that he saw no reason to object to the plans but that there were already issues with the access to Berrells Court from East Street and the council should ask for that to be taken into consideration when MKC consider the application. Deidre Bethune thought It sad that in his pre-application advice the MKC planning officer had found it necessary to comment on the standard of the existing buildings, since the planning authority had passed the plans for their erection in the first place. For information, the officer's actual comment was: "Given a situation where so much has already been given away to developers there is now little left that would amount to a sound basis for discouraging the proposals in this location on conservation grounds. One might argue that the general design or the proposed pair of houses has no discernible regard for context other than aping the general appearance of the existing poorly scaled and detailed terraced dwellings and hence further exacerbating the disintegration of local character, I suppose. As for context, the wider burgage plot form is still respected and some cluttering remnants of ramshackle sheds / garages that are of no discernible interest would be losl • For information, full details of this and all other planning applicaUons can be found at http://publicaccess.millon-keynes.gov. uk/def ault .aspx 
    Driftway
    Last month Rob Ward, Milton Keynes Council Neighbourhood Manager for Environmental Services, attended the council meeting to give an update on the landscaping plans for the banks of Driftway. This ended with Rob saying that the work was to be done 'in weeks' and certainly before the end of April. Tony Evans said he was pleased to report that within days of that meeting the bank surfaces had been scraped and topsoil and seed applied. Tony suggested that the council write to Rob and thank him for his prompt action. However, pressure would need to be maintained to ensure the success of the scheme he said. 
    Market costs (continued) 
    As reported last montln, the council hires a skip and cleaning service to complete tidying up after the Thursday Market stallholders have left. This costs £322 per week which represents 44% of each stall's weekly rent. As the skip doesn't get particularly full, the Council discussed whether ii and the cleaning service provided were worth continuing with. The discussion resumed this month with Tony Evans explaining that the skip would never be filled to more than half capacity, since it was deUvered containing the sweeping machine which drove out at the end of the day to clear up the rubbish. As a result, the Market Place was always left clean and tidy and without this service the obligation would then rest with the stallholders to sweep up. Jeremy Rawlings asked if the stallholders had been asked if they would prefer to keep the skip and cleaner or have a rent reduction. although many felt that they would always opt for a rent reduction regardless of the consequences. Della Chea! asked If the rate charged by the skip supplier was competitive and Mike Hughes said he believed that it was. Tony Evans said he would like representative of the stallholders to attend a meeting with the council, since the council were currently getting very little direct feedback and the proposed stallholders committee had yet to materialise, he said. Eventually it was decided to keep the existing arrangement but review in the event of a price increase by the skip supplier. 
    Market Place parking 
    Napier Parking, the company that manages the parking restrictions on the Market Place, had informed the council that changes in legislation meant that the wording of the signage would need to be amended and quoted £1300 for the new signs. Tony Evans said that such legislative changes do not occur overnight and Napier should have known about them when they provided the original signs. He did not see why OTC should have to pay for Napier's mistake. Dave Price said he found it offensive that the new wording specifically stated that the parking restriction also applied to disabled drivers, although others though that it was necessary to provide clarification. There was concern from some members that the council are not gelling value for money from Napier and Mike Hughes wondered If they should investigate other contractors, but pointed out rather tongue in cheek that he was not connected with any such companies (presumably In response to a recent letter In The Phoneboxl) 
    Dave Price 
    Dave Price announced that he was standing down and handed his formal letter of resignation to the Clerk. For Information, Dave has served on the council for the last 15 years, including four years as Mayor from 1998 to 2002. Mike Hughes thanked Dave for his service to the council and noted that he would be sorely missed, prompting a round of applause from the rest of the members. Dave then donned a leather flying helmet and goggles (he really did! - Mercury) and walked out quietly into the night to begin a new life as an ordinary citizen of Olney, or possibly a poet ...... 
    Next Meeting - Monday 9th May
    The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 9th May in the Council Chamber In the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. Olney Town Council Annual Town Meeting will take place on Thursday 28th April 2011 at 7.30pm In the Olney Centre. 
    ·       April 28th 2011 - Olney Town Meeting
    Olney Town Meeting report for May 2012
    The Meeting
    The Town Meeting is held yearly and is a chance for the public to learn what the local Police. Olney Town Council and local groups and charities have been doing. Members of the public are welcome to attend and free to ask questions. 
    Chairman's report
    Mike Hughes started the meeting with his report. He praised the various events and organisations in the Town mentioning, amongst many, the Cherry Fair, Raft Race, Motorama, the Scouts and the Sports Clubs. He felt that the organisations and the volunteers behind them added greaUy to Olney's sense of community.  Noting that Olney had won the Best Kept Town award, he thanked both the ground staff and those tending their private gardens. He also explained that Olney Town Council (OTC) had purchased seven acres of land, adjacent to the current sports fields and the allotments, with the aim of using it for recreational and sports use. This would take a few years to achieve due to the surface preparation required. In future years, he said, it also raises the possible return of the Fireworks Night bonfire. 
    Environmental Services
    Rob Ward, Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Neighbourhood Manager for Environmental Services. gave a brief summary of the Rural Neighbourhood Management team's work. It covers the entire rural area of Milton Keynes Borough, two thirds or its geographical area but with a minority of its population. It's the first point of contact for issues such as potholes, bins not being emptied and landscaping issues. When reporting a problem, ring the Environmental Services Helpline on 01908 252570 or surf to  www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/street-care 
    Police report
    Chris Ward gave the Police report. He explained that antisocial behaviour in Olney had declined generally, there'd been increasing numbers attending the Youth Centre and Offic.ers had given talks both there and at local Schools.  The 'highlights' of the crime figures for Olney between Aprll last year and February this year were: 38 violent offences, 2 sexual offences, 8 burglaries, 11 crimes related to vehicles, 5 thefts of pedal cycles, 22 shoplifling offences, 59 theft offences, 57 incidents or criminal damage and 6 drug offences. Overall there were 203 offences, a 28.5% reduction over the same period the year before. 
    Recreations and Services Committee 
    Committee Chair Tony Evans gave this report. He started by noting that, although the changes made each year by OTC may seem small, the difference made over the approximately 25 years he's been Chair of this committee had been astonishing. This year, changes had included the new play equipment on the Recreation Ground and the new Tennis Court.  Dog fouling continues to be a major issue, and Tony stressed the need to persuade dog owners to pick up their mess. He also gave a little more detail on the planned use of the newly purchased land adjacent to the current sports fields and the allotments. Over the next two to three years, it would be prepared as an area suitable for recreation - not necessarily a formal pitch area. He felt it might be used by Junior sides at the weekends and for kick-abouts, but hoped not to see permanent posts erected there. Take-up of the allotments continues to be very high and, due to vandalism, new gates and fences have been erected near their entrance.  Tony thanked Rob Ward for picking up the issue of the Driftway verges and sorting it out. Six inches of topsoil have since been laid and seeded with grass although, unluckily, there'd been hardly any rain since. The Market Place had seen the addition of two new noticeboards and lour new bins, and Tony felt the parking scheme there continued to work very well.  He concluded by thanking the groundsmen Ian and Richard, Reg Webster for his work on the Cemetery grounds, and Gill and Sandra, the Town and Deputy Town Clerks, for their hard work over the year.
    Planning Liaison Committee 
    Steve Clark started by explaining that Olney Town Council can only advise on planning applications, this advice being passed to Milton Keynes Council which then makes the decisions. It had been a quiet year due to current economic conditions and the remaining parcels of land suitable for development running out.  He noted that the landlocked area between the end of Moores Hill and Dinglederry had attracted various planning applications over the years. OTC had consistently opposed them, but ii now seemed likely that MKC may leave the way open for development by selling off some land and releasing a restrictive covenant. The details are beyond the scope of this report but are well worth a read so, for a comprehensive description, surf to stephenclark.mycouncillor.org.uk/2011/01/13/moores-hill-development. Either way, Steve concluded by saying that, until a new planning application had been received, there was nothing concrete for OTC to discuss. 
    Finance Committee
    Deidre Bethune presented a very brief report noting that, again, there'd been no precept raise this year and that the 'Sydney Dix' fund would shortly be renamed the 'Olney Town Council Community Fund'. Its purpose, described by the new name. remains unchanged.  From the handout, the following figures are for the year ended 31st March 2011, with the bracketed figures being for the year before. Total income was £272,000 (£.277,000) and total expenditure £442,000 (£300,000), resulting in an excess of expenditure over income of £169,000 (£23,000). Cash reserves are £363,000 (£526,000). The main difference between this year and last ls the expenditure on land capital of £125,000 (£0), this presumably being related to the purchase of land adjacent to the sports fields. 
    Olney Centre Management Committee 
    Alan Richardson gave this report, saying that the Centre was vibrant and well used. He explained wryly that, in line with the latest safety regulations, door furniture such as handles and crash bars had been replaced, finally making the doors safe after 137 years of continuous usel New presentation boards, projection screens and a flagpole had been purchased. He concluded by thanking Peter the caretaker, Rob the early morning cleaner and Gill and Sandra. 
    Local Groups 
    The Cowper and Museum report was very brief, noting that attendance had been higher than last year and thanking OTC for its support. From the handout, admission income was up 2.7% on last year and a surplus of income over expenditure of £800 was made, compared with a deficit of £3200 last year.  The Ann Hopkins Smith Almshouse Charity had seen two properties become vacant, both now taken by new residents. All houses are occupied but a waiting list is maintained. Any elderly Lady with strong Olney connections can apply for an Almshouse by writing to Tony Evans at Olney Park Farm, Yardley Road, Olney.  The British School Charity awards grants to people in Olney aged under 25 engaging in further education beyond A Level or in occupational training. The ongoing very low interest rates mean that, while It used to rely on an annual income in excess of £3,000, current income is less than £400. This makes the Charity effectively dormant.  John Ferris gave a report on the Newport Pagnell and Olney Uons Club. The Club has around 16 members and has raised just over £14,000 and donated £10,000 during the year, the remaining £4,000 being in reserves. All money donated goes to good causes, administration costs being borne instead by club members. Just over half the donations were local, and included ones to the Brooklands Centre in Newport Pagnell and Willen Hospice.  Neill Elliot reported on The Olney Group (TOG). It had been a successful year, with the Duck and Raft Races being well attended (bar the World Cup) and Fireworks Night going exceptionally well. Mainly as a result of the latter, the total income was £9,000 and there was a surplus of income over expenditure of £2,400. TOG also donated £500 to OTC in part recompense for the loss Incurred three years ago when Fireworks Night was hit by exceptionally wet weather. This year's Raft Race will include entertainment from Olney's Got Balls and the MK Friends of the Caribbean. 
    ·       May 2011
    Olney Council report for July 2012
    More Public than Members
    There were more members of the public than councillors present at the start of this month's meeting, so Mercury was looking forward to an evening of lively debate. 
    Public Participation
    Jim Middleton Five members of the public spoke at this month's meeting. First to speak was Jim Middleton on the subject or the Olney bypass. Jim read from a statement he had submitted to the Milton Keynes Core Strategy examination hearing. Jim said as a resident of Olney he attended the MK South Midlands Panel but was not allowed to say anything at the examination. The point he had made in the written submission was that all the development of urban areas north, south, east and west of Olney was having a hugely detrimental effect on Olney with traffic getting ever worse. Jim said he was ignored, and the panel in fact allowed no transport schemes, other than those in the then government's short term plans. This was a pathetic response from so called professionals to a long term planning exercise, he said, and in his opinion there can be no stronger case for a bypass anywhere in the country than Olney. Jim's full submission can be downloaded from http://www.milton­ keynes.gov.uk/planning-policy/documents/REP-269971- 3_MiddletonMKlnqdoc1 OlneyBP.pdf  Karen Gilbert Next to speak was Karen Gilbert, owner of Beans Cate in the Market Place, on a subject that was obviously of concern to a number of members of the public present, namely the application by Real Estate Advisors Savills, on behalf of Calle Nero, to open a branch in the building previously occupied by Derby House Saddtery. Karen said hers is a small, independent business which would struggle to compete against a large, national chain. The rates in Olney were the highest of the lour locations where she had branches and while Caffe Nero could absorb high business rates, she could not.  Elaine Baxendale Elaine Baxendale also spoke against the application. She has been an Olney resident for nine years, she said, and one of the attractions of the town is Its small 'quirky' establishments. Local businesses would be certain to suffer, she feat. and questioned whether Olney needed another big concern. There was a need to consider the environment, she said. The planning application was discussed as an agenda item later in the meeting.  Brian Rice Next to speak was Bryan Rice on the continued problems of parking In Oakdown Crescent.  Richard Stone Richard Stone, Bar Manager of The Carlton House Club (formerly Olney Working Men's Club) spoke about the proposal to position a bench outside of the club. For Information, this has been the subject of discussions by the council for many years. Many elderly people have complained that there is no where to sit and rest whist making the long walk along the High Street and the council have been looking to find a suitable location for a bench. Richard said that one of the license conditions of the club was that members should leave the club in a quiet and orderly manner. Although the club has a smoking area within the grounds he was concerned that a bench at the front would encourage members who wished to smoke to sit on the bench and also take drinks with them, which would be against the terms of the license. As a previous licensee of The Bull he knew what problems a bench outside would attract, he said. Added to that he and his family lived above the club with bedrooms facing out on to the High Street and they would be bound to suffer disturbed nights, he said.  George Horncasltle George Horncastle, Secretary of the club spoke next and said whist he accepted that the bench was for the benefit of elderly members of the community it would be bound to attract other people and the club would be blamed for disorderly behaviour of customers leaving adjacent licensed premises.
    ·       June 2011
    Olney Council report for August 2011
    Public participation 
    No members of the public present (Mercury plus one!) wished to speak at this month's meeting. 
    Co-option of members
    A vacancy had arisen following the recent resignation of Nigel Birrell and there being no request for an election from the requisite number of the electorate, it fell to the council members present to fill the vacancy by co-option. The two candidates were invited to give a short address to the council to summarise their CVs.  First to speak was David Rumens, who was standing again following his failure to be co­opted to fill one of two vacancies at last month's meeting. David was first elected to OTC in 2008 and served for two years before having to resign due to ill health. Now that his health issues had been resolved David said he would welcome the opportunity of serving the town again as a member of the council. His experience in local government dates back to 1979 when he was elected to South Beds District Council and he has held many positions since. During his last stint on OTC he represented the council at many meetings with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) as he has a keen interest in resolving the enduring problem of high traffic volumes through Olney. He was also instrumental in the battle to keep Olney as a single ward, against the wishes of MKC who wanted to split it into three. He is currently a member of the Neighbourhood Action Group and is proud of his reputation as a 'campaigning councillor', he said.  The second candidate to speak was Tony Summerscales, a civil engineer in the water industry. Although he admitted he had no experience in local govennment he said that he had a young son and wanted him to grow up in a safe community and he was putting himself forward so that he could get involved in maintaining the town and its community for the enjoyment of the next generation.  A secret ballot then took place with Tony Summerscales receiving the most votes and he was duly elected. Steve Clark thanked David Rumens for his interest. David left the meeting at this point. 
    Flood Risk Management 
    Bruce Stewart, Senior Planning Officer - Strategic Flood Risk Management for Milton  Keynes Council was present to explain his role, which he has been in since March 2011, and the implications of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 which is gradually being implemented nationally. The current framework was largely established in the 1930s and 40s, he said and, although some updating had taken place, it did not comply with EU legislation and guidance. The new act meant that MKC as the Local Authority were obliged to take over certain flood responsibilities from the Environment Agency (EA) and Dept. for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). MKC has set up a parent Cabinet-led management group and three officer lead working subgroups comprising Strategic Flood Planning, Flood Prevention and Flooding Emergency Response. The principle shortcomings identified thus far are a lack of in-house water, drainage and flood expertise and a shortage of available funding to address problems in those areas. It isMKC's intention to form closer relationships with Parish and Town Councils who may be able to assist in providing information on local water and flood risk management issues, said Bruce. Mayor Steve Clark said that councils were frustrated that developers were allowed to put in planning applications for floodplains and Bruce replied that any applications with flood implications would now be submitted to him.
    Localism Bill 
    The Localism was introduced to Parliament in December 2010 and seeks to shift much of the decision making of central government to local authorities. Part of the bill deals with the right of communities to submit an 'expression of interest' to the local authority to provide or assist in providing a relevant service on behalf of that authority and that could lead to a transfer of assets from the authority. Steve Clark said that OTC already manages many of its own assets but the bill would widen the scope when it became law. MKC might come under pressure to dispose of some of its local assets such as car parks, the Olney Centre and Emberton Park, he said. In the event of the latter it was unlikely that Emberton Parish Council would be able to afford to manage the park but OTC could consider a joint venture, he suggested. MKC will be running a series of workshops during August and OTC will send representatives with a view to forming a sub-committee. This will doubtless be the subject of discussion at future meeting since in Steve's view it is a massive subject at which OTC should "nibble gently". 
    Recreation ground sewage pipe (continued)
    As reported last month the sewage pipe connecting the four sports club houses to the main in East Street has collapsed, which is why there is regularly an overflow when functions take place at the clubs, necessitating rodding by the council staff. Alan Richardson said that since the last council meeting he had had two meetings with Anglian Water and they had confirmed that from October 1 st 2011 the section of pipe which had collapsed would become the responsibility of Anglian Water under the new proposal to adopt private sewers and lateral drains. Although any work that Anglian Water deemed necessary would be done free of charge the replacement would not happen immediately, he said. The first time a blockage was reported Anglian Water would attend and rod the drain to unblock it. If it then became a regular occurrence then the gang would report it with a recommendation to consider replacement work. Eventually it would get replaced, he said. Deidre Bethune asked if the council would now reconsider the refurbishment of the Market Place toilets now that this particular problem would be resolved at nil cost to the council. 
    Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) 
    Deidre Bethune reported that this hugely popular event would take place for the third year running on Saturday September 12th. Last year's event had made a slight loss, she said, and since then the membership of the Chamber of Trade had reduced. In view of these facts she asked if the council would consider underwriting the event in case of financial loss, as they do for the Firework Night run by TOG (The Olney Group). A figure of £1200 was suggested. Ron Bull said that the Fireworks organisers had only found ii necessary to call on the underwriting once in the 20 year history and he was concerned that BOFF might regularly make a loss. Deidre said that BOFF does not have the funds to absorb the loss themselves. Tony Evans said that he had been a member of the BOFF organising committee for its first two years but felt that there was a big difference between BOFF and the Firework Night, which was organised for the Town. BOFF is a commercial event and stall holders make a profit. Although he agreed that it is a fantastic event he said he felt uncomfortable with the request for underwriting. Should the organisers not be looking to the stallholders themselves to make up any loss, he wondered. Mike Hughes said he felt OTC's role should be to encourage trade and visitors to the town and BOFF should be encouraged so he would not want to be part of any refusal. Eventually the requested for underwriting was agreed by a majority vote. 
    Stoke Goldington wind turbines application
    As reported last month, an application has been received to build 15 wind turbines at Stoke Lodge Farm, Stoke Goldington. Deidre Bethune said in her opinion MKC was in no position to consider this application at present because it does not have a current or adequate policy. Last month Jeremy Rawlings reported that the existing policy had not been updated for some time and MKC had been asked to update it to bring in line with national guidelines. In particular, there was no reference to consideration being given to the proximity of existing installations. There then followed a general discussion about the merits of wind power, in general. Colin Rodden said that he believed sustainable energy is required but wondered if data was available to support it. Deidre said the operating companies refused to publish data about the output of such installations, claiming that it was 'commercially sensitive', so it was impossible to know if they were efficient or not. Jeremy Rawlings said that when there is too much power in the grid it is easier to switch off wind turbines than coal fired power stations so the operators are paid to keep them stationary. Tony Evans said that the incentives to farmers to allow wind farms to be sited on their land were enormous so OTC needed to act quickly if they wanted to stop every farmer around having them. Alan Richardson said that if past experience was anything to go by, once an application was submitted there was nothing that OTC or anyone else could do to stop it. Steve Clark disagreed, saying that the Wind Farm at Petsoe End had been the first application submitted to MKC and that had only been passed by a narrow margin, so it was not a foregone conclusion. Although no formal vote was taken, an informal vote showed that the members were overwhelmingly against the proposal. Full details of the planning application, ref 11/01193/FULEIS can be found at http://publicaccess.milton-keynes.gov.uk/ 
    Odds and sods 
    The newly acquired field next to the Charity Field has been sprayed and ploughed and needs to be seeded as soon as possible after the end of August. A number of quotes for seeding have been received and the council agreed to a local quote of £1800. At the moment it is just known as 'the new field', so if anyone has a suggestion for a better name please contact the Town Clerk, or send your suggestion to The Phonebox.  Mike Hughes said that a resident had reported human excrement at the top of the children's slide on Johnson's Field the previous Friday. He had personally attended with cleaning equipment and removed it, but the incident had been repeated the next day. Rosemary Osbourne asked Debbie Brock what was happening about the provision of double yellow lines at the entrance to Chantry Rise, as turning right on to Weston Road was extremely dangerous. Debbie replied that the consultation had recently taken place as part of the process, which was ongoing.  Jeremy Rawlings reported that after 24 years of loyal service Cheryl Wilson's position at the Youth Club had been 'outsourced' by MKC. The promised administrator was yet to appear though.  Steve Clark reported that as of that day Ousedale School had become an academy. Mercury assumes that The Phonebox's invitation to the celebrations got lost in the post.  Tony Evan said that the grass banks on Driftway were a mess and asked that they be strimmed. In fact, all local landscaped areas that are the responsibility of MKC are in a similar state, he said.  Steve Clark said that the inaugural concert by the Olney Community Choir at the Parish Church had been incredibly well attended. Also, the inaugural concert of Olney Brass at the Carlton House Club had been a great success, with a specially commissioned piece of music 'The One and Olney' being played for the first time. In recognition of their support OTC had been presented with a framed copy of the music, which would be hung in the Olney Centre.  Next Meeting - Monday 5th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    ·       July 2011
    Olney Council report for August 2011
    Public participation 
    No members of the public present (Mercury plus one!) wished to speak at this month's meeting. 
    Co-option of members
    A vacancy had arisen following the recent resignation of Nigel Birrell and there being no request for an election from the requisite number of the electorate, it fell to the council members present to fill the vacancy by co-option. The two candidates were invited to give a short address to the council to summarise their CVs.  First to speak was David Rumens, who was standing again following his failure to be co­opted to fill one of two vacancies at last month's meeting. David was first elected to OTC in 2008 and served for two years before having to resign due to ill health. Now that his health issues had been resolved David said he would welcome the opportunity of serving the town again as a member of the council. His experience in local government dates back to 1979 when he was elected to South Beds District Council and he has held many positions since. During his last stint on OTC he represented the council at many meetings with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) as he has a keen interest in resolving the enduring problem of high traffic volumes through Olney. He was also instrumental in the battle to keep Olney as a single ward, against the wishes of MKC who wanted to split it into three. He is currently a member of the Neighbourhood Action Group and is proud of his reputation as a 'campaigning councillor', he said.  The second candidate to speak was Tony Summerscales, a civil engineer in the water industry. Although he admitted he had no experience in local govennment he said that he had a young son and wanted him to grow up in a safe community and he was putting himself forward so that he could get involved in maintaining the town and its community for the enjoyment of the next generation.  A secret ballot then took place with Tony Summerscales receiving the most votes and he was duly elected. Steve Clark thanked David Rumens for his interest. David left the meeting at this point. 
    Flood Risk Management 
    Bruce Stewart, Senior Planning Officer - Strategic Flood Risk Management for Milton  Keynes Council was present to explain his role, which he has been in since March 2011, and the implications of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 which is gradually being implemented nationally. The current framework was largely established in the 1930s and 40s, he said and, although some updating had taken place, it did not comply with EU legislation and guidance. The new act meant that MKC as the Local Authority were obliged to take over certain flood responsibilities from the Environment Agency (EA) and Dept. for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). MKC has set up a parent Cabinet-led management group and three officer lead working subgroups comprising Strategic Flood Planning, Flood Prevention and Flooding Emergency Response. The principle shortcomings identified thus far are a lack of in-house water, drainage and flood expertise and a shortage of available funding to address problems in those areas. It isMKC's intention to form closer relationships with Parish and Town Councils who may be able to assist in providing information on local water and flood risk management issues, said Bruce. Mayor Steve Clark said that councils were frustrated that developers were allowed to put in planning applications for floodplains and Bruce replied that any applications with flood implications would now be submitted to him.
    Localism Bill 
    The Localism was introduced to Parliament in December 2010 and seeks to shift much of the decision making of central government to local authorities. Part of the bill deals with the right of communities to submit an 'expression of interest' to the local authority to provide or assist in providing a relevant service on behalf of that authority and that could lead to a transfer of assets from the authority. Steve Clark said that OTC already manages many of its own assets but the bill would widen the scope when it became law. MKC might come under pressure to dispose of some of its local assets such as car parks, the Olney Centre and Emberton Park, he said. In the event of the latter it was unlikely that Emberton Parish Council would be able to afford to manage the park but OTC could consider a joint venture, he suggested. MKC will be running a series of workshops during August and OTC will send representatives with a view to forming a sub-committee. This will doubtless be the subject of discussion at future meeting since in Steve's view it is a massive subject at which OTC should "nibble gently". 
    Recreation ground sewage pipe (continued)
    As reported last month the sewage pipe connecting the four sports club houses to the main in East Street has collapsed, which is why there is regularly an overflow when functions take place at the clubs, necessitating rodding by the council staff. Alan Richardson said that since the last council meeting he had had two meetings with Anglian Water and they had confirmed that from October 1 st 2011 the section of pipe which had collapsed would become the responsibility of Anglian Water under the new proposal to adopt private sewers and lateral drains. Although any work that Anglian Water deemed necessary would be done free of charge the replacement would not happen immediately, he said. The first time a blockage was reported Anglian Water would attend and rod the drain to unblock it. If it then became a regular occurrence then the gang would report it with a recommendation to consider replacement work. Eventually it would get replaced, he said. Deidre Bethune asked if the council would now reconsider the refurbishment of the Market Place toilets now that this particular problem would be resolved at nil cost to the council. 
    Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) 
    Deidre Bethune reported that this hugely popular event would take place for the third year running on Saturday September 12th. Last year's event had made a slight loss, she said, and since then the membership of the Chamber of Trade had reduced. In view of these facts she asked if the council would consider underwriting the event in case of financial loss, as they do for the Firework Night run by TOG (The Olney Group). A figure of £1200 was suggested. Ron Bull said that the Fireworks organisers had only found ii necessary to call on the underwriting once in the 20 year history and he was concerned that BOFF might regularly make a loss. Deidre said that BOFF does not have the funds to absorb the loss themselves. Tony Evans said that he had been a member of the BOFF organising committee for its first two years but felt that there was a big difference between BOFF and the Firework Night, which was organised for the Town. BOFF is a commercial event and stall holders make a profit. Although he agreed that it is a fantastic event he said he felt uncomfortable with the request for underwriting. Should the organisers not be looking to the stallholders themselves to make up any loss, he wondered. Mike Hughes said he felt OTC's role should be to encourage trade and visitors to the town and BOFF should be encouraged so he would not want to be part of any refusal. Eventually the requested for underwriting was agreed by a majority vote. 
    Stoke Goldington wind turbines application
    As reported last month, an application has been received to build 15 wind turbines at Stoke Lodge Farm, Stoke Goldington. Deidre Bethune said in her opinion MKC was in no position to consider this application at present because it does not have a current or adequate policy. Last month Jeremy Rawlings reported that the existing policy had not been updated for some time and MKC had been asked to update it to bring in line with national guidelines. In particular, there was no reference to consideration being given to the proximity of existing installations. There then followed a general discussion about the merits of wind power, in general. Colin Rodden said that he believed sustainable energy is required but wondered if data was available to support it. Deidre said the operating companies refused to publish data about the output of such installations, claiming that it was 'commercially sensitive', so it was impossible to know if they were efficient or not. Jeremy Rawlings said that when there is too much power in the grid it is easier to switch off wind turbines than coal fired power stations so the operators are paid to keep them stationary. Tony Evans said that the incentives to farmers to allow wind farms to be sited on their land were enormous so OTC needed to act quickly if they wanted to stop every farmer around having them. Alan Richardson said that if past experience was anything to go by, once an application was submitted there was nothing that OTC or anyone else could do to stop it. Steve Clark disagreed, saying that the Wind Farm at Petsoe End had been the first application submitted to MKC and that had only been passed by a narrow margin, so it was not a foregone conclusion. Although no formal vote was taken, an informal vote showed that the members were overwhelmingly against the proposal. Full details of the planning application, ref 11/01193/FULEIS can be found at http://publicaccess.milton-keynes.gov.uk/ 
    Odds and sods 
    The newly acquired field next to the Charity Field has been sprayed and ploughed and needs to be seeded as soon as possible after the end of August. A number of quotes for seeding have been received and the council agreed to a local quote of £1800. At the moment it is just known as 'the new field', so if anyone has a suggestion for a better name please contact the Town Clerk, or send your suggestion to The Phonebox.  Mike Hughes said that a resident had reported human excrement at the top of the children's slide on Johnson's Field the previous Friday. He had personally attended with cleaning equipment and removed it, but the incident had been repeated the next day. Rosemary Osbourne asked Debbie Brock what was happening about the provision of double yellow lines at the entrance to Chantry Rise, as turning right on to Weston Road was extremely dangerous. Debbie replied that the consultation had recently taken place as part of the process, which was ongoing.  Jeremy Rawlings reported that after 24 years of loyal service Cheryl Wilson's position at the Youth Club had been 'outsourced' by MKC. The promised administrator was yet to appear though.  Steve Clark reported that as of that day Ousedale School had become an academy. Mercury assumes that The Phonebox's invitation to the celebrations got lost in the post.  Tony Evan said that the grass banks on Driftway were a mess and asked that they be strimmed. In fact, all local landscaped areas that are the responsibility of MKC are in a similar state, he said.  Steve Clark said that the inaugural concert by the Olney Community Choir at the Parish Church had been incredibly well attended. Also, the inaugural concert of Olney Brass at the Carlton House Club had been a great success, with a specially commissioned piece of music 'The One and Olney' being played for the first time. In recognition of their support OTC had been presented with a framed copy of the music, which would be hung in the Olney Centre.  Next Meeting - Monday 5th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate. 
    ·       August 2011
    Olney Council report for August.... 2011
    Public participation 
    No members of the public present (Mercury plus one!) wished to speak at this month's meeting. 
    Co-option of members
    A vacancy had arisen following the recent resignation of Nigel Birrell and there being no request for an election from the requisite number of the electorate, it fell to the council members present to fill the vacancy by co-option. The two candidates were invited to give a short address to the council to summarise their CVs.  First to speak was David Rumens, who was standing again following his failure to be co­opted to fill one of two vacancies at last month's meeting. David was first elected to OTC in 2008 and served for two years before having to resign due to ill health. Now that his health issues had been resolved David said he would welcome the opportunity of serving the town again as a member of the council. His experience in local government dates back to 1979 when he was elected to South Beds District Council and he has held many positions since. During his last stint on OTC he represented the council at many meetings with Milton Keynes Council (MKC) as he has a keen interest in resolving the enduring problem of high traffic volumes through Olney. He was also instrumental in the battle to keep Olney as a single ward, against the wishes of MKC who wanted to split it into three. He is currently a member of the Neighbourhood Action Group and is proud of his reputation as a 'campaigning councillor', he said.  The second candidate to speak was Tony Summerscales, a civil engineer in the water industry. Although he admitted he had no experience in local govennment he said that he had a young son and wanted him to grow up in a safe community and he was putting himself forward so that he could get involved in maintaining the town and its community for the enjoyment of the next generation.  A secret ballot then took place with Tony Summerscales receiving the most votes and he was duly elected. Steve Clark thanked David Rumens for his interest. David left the meeting at this point. 
    Flood Risk Management 
    Bruce Stewart, Senior Planning Officer - Strategic Flood Risk Management for Milton  Keynes Council was present to explain his role, which he has been in since March 2011, and the implications of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 which is gradually being implemented nationally. The current framework was largely established in the 1930s and 40s, he said and, although some updating had taken place, it did not comply with EU legislation and guidance. The new act meant that MKC as the Local Authority were obliged to take over certain flood responsibilities from the Environment Agency (EA) and Dept. for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). MKC has set up a parent Cabinet-led management group and three officer lead working subgroups comprising Strategic Flood Planning, Flood Prevention and Flooding Emergency Response. The principle shortcomings identified thus far are a lack of in-house water, drainage and flood expertise and a shortage of available funding to address problems in those areas. It isMKC's intention to form closer relationships with Parish and Town Councils who may be able to assist in providing information on local water and flood risk management issues, said Bruce. Mayor Steve Clark said that councils were frustrated that developers were allowed to put in planning applications for floodplains and Bruce replied that any applications with flood implications would now be submitted to him.
    Localism Bill 
    The Localism was introduced to Parliament in December 2010 and seeks to shift much of the decision making of central government to local authorities. Part of the bill deals with the right of communities to submit an 'expression of interest' to the local authority to provide or assist in providing a relevant service on behalf of that authority and that could lead to a transfer of assets from the authority. Steve Clark said that OTC already manages many of its own assets but the bill would widen the scope when it became law. MKC might come under pressure to dispose of some of its local assets such as car parks, the Olney Centre and Emberton Park, he said. In the event of the latter it was unlikely that Emberton Parish Council would be able to afford to manage the park but OTC could consider a joint venture, he suggested. MKC will be running a series of workshops during August and OTC will send representatives with a view to forming a sub-committee. This will doubtless be the subject of discussion at future meeting since in Steve's view it is a massive subject at which OTC should "nibble gently". 
    Recreation ground sewage pipe (continued)
    As reported last month the sewage pipe connecting the four sports club houses to the main in East Street has collapsed, which is why there is regularly an overflow when functions take place at the clubs, necessitating rodding by the council staff. Alan Richardson said that since the last council meeting he had had two meetings with Anglian Water and they had confirmed that from October 1 st 2011 the section of pipe which had collapsed would become the responsibility of Anglian Water under the new proposal to adopt private sewers and lateral drains. Although any work that Anglian Water deemed necessary would be done free of charge the replacement would not happen immediately, he said. The first time a blockage was reported Anglian Water would attend and rod the drain to unblock it. If it then became a regular occurrence then the gang would report it with a recommendation to consider replacement work. Eventually it would get replaced, he said. Deidre Bethune asked if the council would now reconsider the refurbishment of the Market Place toilets now that this particular problem would be resolved at nil cost to the council. 
    Big Olney Food Festival (BOFF) 
    Deidre Bethune reported that this hugely popular event would take place for the third year running on Saturday September 12th. Last year's event had made a slight loss, she said, and since then the membership of the Chamber of Trade had reduced. In view of these facts she asked if the council would consider underwriting the event in case of financial loss, as they do for the Firework Night run by TOG (The Olney Group). A figure of £1200 was suggested. Ron Bull said that the Fireworks organisers had only found ii necessary to call on the underwriting once in the 20 year history and he was concerned that BOFF might regularly make a loss. Deidre said that BOFF does not have the funds to absorb the loss themselves. Tony Evans said that he had been a member of the BOFF organising committee for its first two years but felt that there was a big difference between BOFF and the Firework Night, which was organised for the Town. BOFF is a commercial event and stall holders make a profit. Although he agreed that it is a fantastic event he said he felt uncomfortable with the request for underwriting. Should the organisers not be looking to the stallholders themselves to make up any loss, he wondered. Mike Hughes said he felt OTC's role should be to encourage trade and visitors to the town and BOFF should be encouraged so he would not want to be part of any refusal. Eventually the requested for underwriting was agreed by a majority vote. 
    Stoke Goldington wind turbines application
    As reported last month, an application has been received to build 15 wind turbines at Stoke Lodge Farm, Stoke Goldington. Deidre Bethune said in her opinion MKC was in no position to consider this application at present because it does not have a current or adequate policy. Last month Jeremy Rawlings reported that the existing policy had not been updated for some time and MKC had been asked to update it to bring in line with national guidelines. In particular, there was no reference to consideration being given to the proximity of existing installations. There then followed a general discussion about the merits of wind power, in general. Colin Rodden said that he believed sustainable energy is required but wondered if data was available to support it. Deidre said the operating companies refused to publish data about the output of such installations, claiming that it was 'commercially sensitive', so it was impossible to know if they were efficient or not. Jeremy Rawlings said that when there is too much power in the grid it is easier to switch off wind turbines than coal fired power stations so the operators are paid to keep them stationary. Tony Evans said that the incentives to farmers to allow wind farms to be sited on their land were enormous so OTC needed to act quickly if they wanted to stop every farmer around having them. Alan Richardson said that if past experience was anything to go by, once an application was submitted there was nothing that OTC or anyone else could do to stop it. Steve Clark disagreed, saying that the Wind Farm at Petsoe End had been the first application submitted to MKC and that had only been passed by a narrow margin, so it was not a foregone conclusion. Although no formal vote was taken, an informal vote showed that the members were overwhelmingly against the proposal. Full details of the planning application, ref 11/01193/FULEIS can be found at http://publicaccess.milton-keynes.gov.uk/ 
    Odds and sods 
    The newly acquired field next to the Charity Field has been sprayed and ploughed and needs to be seeded as soon as possible after the end of August. A number of quotes for seeding have been received and the council agreed to a local quote of £1800. At the moment it is just known as 'the new field', so if anyone has a suggestion for a better name please contact the Town Clerk, or send your suggestion to The Phonebox.  Mike Hughes said that a resident had reported human excrement at the top of the children's slide on Johnson's Field the previous Friday. He had personally attended with cleaning equipment and removed it, but the incident had been repeated the next day. Rosemary Osbourne asked Debbie Brock what was happening about the provision of double yellow lines at the entrance to Chantry Rise, as turning right on to Weston Road was extremely dangerous. Debbie replied that the consultation had recently taken place as part of the process, which was ongoing.  Jeremy Rawlings reported that after 24 years of loyal service Cheryl Wilson's position at the Youth Club had been 'outsourced' by MKC. The promised administrator was yet to appear though.  Steve Clark reported that as of that day Ousedale School had become an academy. Mercury assumes that The Phonebox's invitation to the celebrations got lost in the post.  Tony Evan said that the grass banks on Driftway were a mess and asked that they be strimmed. In fact, all local landscaped areas that are the responsibility of MKC are in a similar state, he said.  Steve Clark said that the inaugural concert by the Olney Community Choir at the Parish Church had been incredibly well attended. Also, the inaugural concert of Olney Brass at the Carlton House Club had been a great success, with a specially commissioned piece of music 'The One and Olney' being played for the first time. In recognition of their support OTC had been presented with a framed copy of the music, which would be hung in the Olney Centre.  Next Meeting - Monday 5th September The next meeting will be held at 7.30pm on Monday 5th September in the Council Chamber in the Olney Centre. Members of the public are always welcome to attend and, if they wish, speak at the start of the meeting, or at any point that the mayor decides is appropriate.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    Please use our contact form to ask about advertising or for more information

    Thank you! Your submission was successfully sent :-)×
    Opps! Some went wrong... Your submission did not go through :-(×
    Prickly Pear Icon

    Made by Prickly Pear